Slashdot Mirror


NTT's Cool - Human Area Networking Technology

kvsnut writes "I4U is reporting about NTT's research project called RedTacton - It 'safely turns the surface of the human body into a data transmission path at speeds up to 10 Mbps between any two points on the body.' There is a pretty interesting site (uses flash) setup to showcase the technology. If you want to jump to a non-flash overview, try here. It be cool if I could sync my Treo (I'm saving for) by just touching a cradle (or heck the PC)."

248 comments

  1. This sounds awesome... by rekenner · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damn. I've always wanted to copy and paste between computers. This could be a dream come true for people that have to work on a large number of computers for a short amount of time...

    1. Re:This sounds awesome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://synergy2.sourceforge.net/index.html

      Synergy is a kind of software KVM that lets you link your mouse, keyboard, and even the clipboard across multiple machines and OSes over any network including the internet.

    2. Re:This sounds awesome... by rekenner · · Score: 1

      Seen it. In the sitation I'm thinking of, it couldn't be done. I REALLY flipping wish, though.

    3. Re:This sounds awesome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Better still, it allows me to copy & paste my girlfriend !?

    4. Re:This sounds awesome... by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Have you tried x2vnc? It lets you tie together multiple X11 displays. Pretty cool really.

    5. Re:This sounds awesome... by prichardson · · Score: 1

      http://www.lagercrantz.ath.cx/software/clipboardsh aring/

      You can set it up to auto-sync and then it's completely transparent. I haven't tried it across more than two computers, but I imagine it works fine.

      It also will save any number of previous clipboards for you.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    6. Re:This sounds awesome... by querencia · · Score: 1

      Damn. I've always wanted to copy and paste between computers. This could be a dream come true for people that have to work on a large number of computers for a short amount of time...

      Unfortunately, it wouldn't work if you couldn't reach both computers so you could touch them both at the same time. Luckily, you also have the RedNard data storage and transfer solution: up to 4 GB of storage! (Assuming you have two....)

    7. Re:This sounds awesome... by mboverload · · Score: 5, Funny

      "But baby I was only grabbing your ass to see if you had some D12 MP3s!"

    8. Re:This sounds awesome... by mesach · · Score: 1

      Hey honey, it's time to sync up my iPod! i've got a lot of new music!

      --
      moo.
  2. Hands Across America by Kip+Winger · · Score: 5, Funny

    I see immediate applications for this technology -- we need to bring back Hands Across America to create the information superhighway of the 21st century!

    --
    - - - - - Fear not the reaper, but my shiny white teeth.
    1. Re:Hands Across America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The RIAA would probably try to bust everyone for illegal P2P (person to person) file sharing.

    2. Re:Hands Across America by mmu_man · · Score: 1

      "you have been convinced of illegal file sharing and sentensed to having hands chopped !"

    3. Re:Hands Across America by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      you have been convinced of illegal file sharing and sentensed to having hands chopped !

      Hm... Was that a "drunk on rum" or "drunk on vodka" post?

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    4. Re:Hands Across America by sbassett · · Score: 1

      YES, FLESHNET

      --
      OOOOH, the internet.
  3. Ack! by MistabewM · · Score: 1, Funny

    You would never be able to use the excuse that you lost her phone number after a one night stand.

    I say boo! to this on behalf of my fellow man...

    seeing this is slashdot though and the chance of a one night stand is * 0 bring it on!

    --
    "A learning experience is one of those things that says, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.'" - DNA
    1. Re:Ack! by cybertears · · Score: 2, Insightful

      with a simple disposable firewall none of her information will be able to access your network and vice versa. These firewalls are already available at just about every place imaginable and come in packages of one, three and twelve. Larger packages can be found as well.

    2. Re:Ack! by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      Larger packages can be found as well.

      Funny you should mention that. A couple years back I was coming out of my first long term relationship, and our primary contraceptive was the pill, backed up with VCF. Well, being on the open market again for the first time in six years I didn't have any condoms, talking to a friend (who had just knocked up his wife) I complained about a few nights before when I needed to stop and pick up condoms on the way over to my "new friend"'s house (to complain about the clerk, actually) Not needing them any more he proceeds to pull out a huge box of trojans -- 100 count or something.

      Which was great of him. Until to underscore the quantity I messed up and called it a "family pack" ;)

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  4. More trouble than it's worth? by koreaman · · Score: 1

    Isn't this a bit more trouble than it's worth? After all, how hard is it to plug something in to a USB slot?

    1. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It might seem that way, but you'd be surprised what a differnce it would make in practice. As an example: an 8-pound laptop is perfectly portable. Nothing really stopping you from taking it everywhere with you. But you will not, in fact, take it many places. A 3-pound laptop, on the other hand, you will take all over the place. So while there is nothing "hard" about plugging in a cable there is still a reason to avoid it if possible.

    2. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by QuantumG · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Uhhh hard. Every single time I have to plug a USB thumb drive into a PC it takes at least 5 minutes. Usually because I have to pull something else out to find a slot. You might be wondering what this technology would have over bluetooth. Well have you ever used bluetooth? You inevitably have to fiddle with it for minutes to find the menu option that lists the devices that you have already registered with and then fiddle more to map the name that is on the menu with the device that you can see, point at, and touch in the real would (but has no clear identifier on it that matches it with the menu option). All this technology is the reason why people don't like technology. The user interfaces are really unintuitive. Ultimately, loading a file from my portable data storage device onto a computer should be as simple as sitting down at the computer, selecting File -> Open and clicking the little icon of a happy user called "QuantumG's files". If someone else has the file it should be as easy as asking them to touch the computer and selecting "John's files". Transfering a file from my device to Johns should be as simple as the both of us touching a computer and dragging the files from my device to his.

      And should someone at an lcd factory ever get off their ass and make a transparent lcd that fits into a contact lens or better yet, the membrane of your eye you'll be able to use your personal network to communicate with your mobile computer, storage and interface.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    3. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by LnxAddct · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If I have a phone with a contact you want on it, I'll just let you hold my phone while you hold yours and then you give it right back. It'd take less then a second for us to sync contacts without plugging in a single thing. This could be done while walking down the street, and another aspect of it is that its more secure then using blue tooth or other wireless transmission that tends to not be encrypted. The potential for this is pretty amazing. Another one I can think of off the top of my head is if you wear something like a watch or chain that sends a constantly shifting key through your body (similar to the rsa little devices), then simply by touching something you could verify you were the holder of a credit card or other miscellaneous forms of authorization. It'd be like a digital fingerprint. If your groceries are tagged with rfid, have a scanner find the cost of everything in your cart, then you simply touch a little piece of metal or something to pay for it. The whole process could take less then a second. Another possible use is to place sensors on steering wheels... This could reshape how we interact with the world. Now if only they can find a way for the body to retain that information for short (or long) periods of time. We'd be walking harddrives, so much for a 40 gb ipod...just touch the headphones to your skin somewhere.
      Regards,
      Steve

    4. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      You inevitably have to fiddle with it for minutes to find the menu option that lists the devices that you have already registered with

      I would do this by clicking the KDE Bluetooth icon, and then clicking the device name... or simply right-clicking and choosing the device from the recent list, if I used it recently.

      I take it you are used to Microsoft's so-called user-friendly approach.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    5. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every single time I have to plug a USB thumb drive into a PC it takes at least 5 minutes. Usually because I have to pull something else out to find a slot.

      Uhhh, buy a hub. They're pretty cheap.

    6. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      what? and carry it with me?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    7. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Funny

      How many people take 5 minutes to swap out one usb cable for another? I mean, what's the breakdown here?

      1 Minute - Do I really need to unplug my USB flashlight to download my digital camera pix?
      1 Minute - Where the **** is my digital camera?
      1 Minute - Where the **** is my laptop?
      .25 Minutes - Where the **** am I?
      .75 Minutes - Oh yeah right, Earth.
      .25 Minutes - Pull out USB cable.
      .25 Minutes - Plug in digital camera into USB port.
      .25 Minutes - Continue plugging and unplugging because the icon didn't appear right away.
      .25 Minutes - Phone ringing, give up, buddy needs assistance setting up his new WinXP box. Lucky he has an expert like me around.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tsk tsk. Poor Windows user.

      I just click on the bluetooth icon and there are my devices.

    9. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. There are small enough hubs to go with even the smallest of computers. See http://www.mittoni.com.au/catalog/popup_image.php/ pID/1826

    10. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And should someone at an lcd factory ever get off their ass and make a transparent lcd that fits into a contact lens or better yet, the membrane of your eye you'll be able to use your personal network to communicate with your mobile computer, storage and interface.

      As soon as someone does this there will be spam for retinal implants. Imagine seeing porn and viagra ads 24/7. There was a guy in Neal Stephenson's Cryptonomicon that had a similar problem; he saw ads for a roach motel in the corner of his eye all the time, closing his eyes did nothing. He killed himself.

    11. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Mistlefoot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But imagine my iPod with headphones using my body as the 'wire'.......

    12. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You might be wondering what this technology would have over bluetooth. Well have you ever used bluetooth? You inevitably have to fiddle with it for minutes to find the menu option that lists the devices that you have already registered with and then fiddle more to map the name that is on the menu with the device

      Sounds like you are just complaining about some flaws in the implementation of bluetooth rather than actually suggesting an advantage of the HAN approach. How does HAN really solve these problems? You still have to deal with the problem of disambiguation. You still have to have some kind of authorization mechanism so that every device you touch doesn't have instant access to every other device you touch. (Can you imagine a computer virus that literally spreads by touch?)

      There are ways that the UI for bluetooth can be improved - to an extent. Security is always inconvenient. That's how Microsoft can stay ahead. Just ignore security and make your UIs better.

      -a

    13. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by okayplayer · · Score: 1

      And what if someone steals your watch... Have they stolen your now truly electronic identity? Are we really going to trust some company or heaven's forbid the big "G" to safeguard the keyrings?

      Knowing slashdot.... I somehow doubt it.

      --
      What a horrible thing the ESRB just did to the game industry.
    14. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by megajini · · Score: 1

      Finally. This was the first thing I was thinking of. I hate those cables...

      But the greatest thing would be:
      Imagine an override by your cellular. You can listen to your iPod as long as you want, and then -- magically your cellular delivers another audio-stream (phone call) and boom. No need to take out any device and control anything...

      By the way: There is no solution to the multidevice - one audio output out there... at least no portable. Some kind of network would be a natural choice. Bluetooth currently always uses Point-to-Point connection between your cellular and headset. Thus there is no way to get in... Except when you build a super-geek-headset that features simultanious connection to two devices.

    15. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by glib909 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can you imagine a computer virus that literally spreads by touch?

      Imagine ... virtual crab lice.
      --
      Suudsu, that stuff is G-E-W-D.
    16. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Shambhu · · Score: 1

      This thing is essentially a new way of networking. There's no particular reason to expect the interface to be better than Bluetooth's, unless you think that Bluetooth's is below average.

      --
      Rome wasn't bilked in a day.
    17. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by doubtless · · Score: 1

      just touch the headphones to your skin somewhere

      don't your ears have skin? =/

      --
      geek page at KY speaks
    18. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Columcille · · Score: 1

      Think perhaps a combination of methods. A watch that contains personal identity information and somehow monitors your bodies electrochemical status while you wear it. It verifies you are you because it has in a sense monitored your vitals and knows what your stats have been. A drastic change could show that a new user is wearing the watch and therefore the watch would fail to transmit data, instead going into some sort of lockdown mode.

      I don't know biology, chemistry, or human anatomy all that well so this is pure speculation. :) Still, something like this doesn't seem too farfetched, while perhaps not quite yet available with today's technology.

      --
      I love my sig.
    19. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still have to have some kind of authorization mechanism...

      Not on Windows!

      (Can you imagine a computer virus that literally spreads by touch?)

      Yes. And Microsoft will aide it, if HAN becomes popular. Mark my words...

    20. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A HAN deals nicely with the problem of disambiguation. It provides a physical incarnation of the connection, instead of an abstract one based on names like you have to use with wireless. Much like wires, but without the hassle. In fact, a combination of this with wireless would be ideal. Touch the devices you want to connect. They handshake (almost literally...) and exchange encryption keys privately through your body, then you've established the connection. Afterwards they can broadcast real information through the air using encryption that is pretty much impossible to break unless the attacker has a bug on your body (but in this case it would be just as secure as regular wireless encryption, or that is to say as secure as regular wireless encryption would be if it were properly implemented). It provides an extra layer of security *and* convenient disambiguation, and you don't have to sit there holding the devices while they transfer data.

    21. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Not to mention what happened to my computer when I put a defective usb flash drive in.

      Drive got real hot and now my computer thinks I have 4 usb hard drives installed permanently. (One for each slot) It seems the id number for that drive was burned onto my usb ports.

    22. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly, that is why low power 802.11b is better.

      the devices simply show up on the network.

    23. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was going to say that myself. All I have do is walk into the room and KDE Bluetooth automatically notices the phone.

      Evolution with multisync will also automatically notice the phone and synchronize my contacts and appointments.

      No hassles at all.

    24. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I've done this with palm pilots for almost a decade now.

      you can "beam" most anything in the palmpilot to another pilot.

      and the insanely funny part?? even now, most people do not know that if you simply hold down the personal contacts button it will select your info and beam it right now.

      this "new" technology is no better or easier than the palm beaming, because you will still haveto sctivate the xfer and accept the xfer.

      if not, then nobody sane will want this.

      Imagine that if you do not have to initiate and accept that I can steal all your data by simply touching you in a crowded place.

      Yes, IR data transfers can be sped up to the 10mbps.. Newer machines like my NX80V clie have a processor that can handle speeds like that.

      The biggest holdback is Copyright paranoia.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    25. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Bigman · · Score: 1

      don't your ears have skin? =/ .. Not since I started listening to KMFDM..... ;o)

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
    26. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by dajak · · Score: 1

      I am not the only one who can spend minutes finding out:

      a) which 'removable disk' corresponds to the device I want to unplug,
      b) which application it is that still has a lock on a file on that disk,
      c) into which port in which hub the black cable attached to the device I want to unplug goes,
      d) where on my desk the black cable with the special connector for my digital camera is, and where the other end of that black cable is?

      Surely there are other disorganized people with 6 usb memory sticks, a usb CD burner, a usb HD as well as some other devices like the usb bluetooth dongle, PDA, and 3 usb cameras like me.

    27. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by nat5an · · Score: 1

      Not to nitpick, but I think that was actually in The Diamond Age. Cryptonomicon took place in the present (more or less), so I don't think this was in there.

      --
      Head down, go to sleep to the rhythm of the war drums...
    28. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      >Well have you ever used bluetooth?

      Why yes, yes I have. All I have to do is double-click a shortcut and my PDA is connected to my PC in a second.

      Have YOU ever used bluetooth?

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    29. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by koreaman · · Score: 1

      As other posters have suggested, buy a hub. They're really nice.

    30. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then != than

    31. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Name the memory sticks. This will make finding "What letter is associated with what disk/stick" much easier. Usually works for cameras too, since they usually just act as interfaces for the stick.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    32. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      (Can you imagine a computer virus that literally spreads by touch?)

      Can you imagine having to hook up passcards system to the virus scaning service to literally scan every employee as they come in the morning just incase that don't pick anything up at home? How about having to quarantee employees that are infected until IT staff can dis infect them? Gosh, I don't even want to think about data plagues. The good news is that really important information should be backed up on the server and tape.

    33. Re:More trouble than it's worth? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Umm no, you may be able to do this now but it took you hours to get all that set up, including figuring how to "mate" the PDA to the PC so they trust each other. The scenario is: walk into an office you've never been to before, transfer data using bluetooth to a computer which you have never used before. Now observe how long this takes. It's a hell of a lot longer than it takes to plug in a usb stick, and that's a hell of a lot longer than it should take.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
  5. Use Bluetooth by SiMac · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's the point beyond the coolness factor? Palm devices can already sync via 802.11b or Bluetooth. Wireless technologies can already go faster than 10 mbps, and are cheap and well-tested. If we can transmit data through the air, why do we need to transmit it through our bodies?

    1. Re:Use Bluetooth by ingo23 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It may be more secure than bluetooth - you need a physical contact. So for something like a digital keychain it would be quite convenient. It could be more practical than fingerprints (less errors) and let you authenticate just by touching the sensor.

      On the other side, I will need another firewall for this!!!

    2. Re:Use Bluetooth by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be awfully handy for implanted computers, like pacemakers. Wireless should be used only in situations where it is necessary. If contact is convenient it is a better idea. Air gaps are good. For instance when we finally get around to implanting systems to improve our senses we are going to want ways to pipe data in and out of them. Would you like your senses to be on tap (or for rent) wirelessly? I didn't think so. On the other hand, you could have optical and audio interfaces implanted, and have a computer device in a watch for example, which I obviously mention because it commonly touches the skin. You still want to use encryption so you can't just lean up against something and have all your devices' interfaces exposed to dirty, dirty networks, but raising the bar to involve touch is generally a good thing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Use Bluetooth by LionKimbro · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, here's one thing: Security.

      One thing we lost when we went from wired to unwired is security.

      That is: A physical cable is a physical incarnation of authorization. Without that cable, we now have to put password mechanisms and other authorization stuff into previously simple connection.

      This body network is another, easier, mechanism for authorization. If the two components are connected by your body, they are authorized to talk with one another.

      Now we just have to worry about people running past to touch you, in order to steal the photographs off your camera, or whatever.

    4. Re:Use Bluetooth by DJ_Tricks · · Score: 1

      can you say security ? using something that is directly connected protects you from the evils of packet sniffing the air for Classified contacts/ information. If i touch my computer and it then see the connection of the phone in my hand i can then touch my other devices and transfer the files to everything with no packets flying in the air. This technology would work greatly for say military applications or for top secret information or even for people who want to protect contact lists and data they dont want anyway of getting in the public

      --
      "to be like god we make our own dolls to play with, but what does that make us, but dolls for god to play with?" Ikari,
    5. Re:Use Bluetooth by ricka0 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are already using it.

    6. Re:Use Bluetooth by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      You used to have to worry about someone 'accidentally' bumping into you on the subway...and then your wallet is gone.

      Now someone would 'accidentally' bump into you on the subway and they would have the blueprints for NORAD or the codes for the nuclear football. Even worse, you could find your personal porn collection replaced with pictures of the goatse guy.

      Yeah--on the whole 'good bad' scale, that would be 'bad'.

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    7. Re:Use Bluetooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ersonal porn collection replaced with pictures of the goatse guy.

      thats my hobby, look at colleges shares, and replace porn
    8. Re:Use Bluetooth by ChatHuant · · Score: 1

      What's the point beyond the coolness factor?

      That would be pretty useful for wearable devices; for example, a smart watch (a la Microsoft's SPOT) could interface with a display device in a pair of sunglasses or with a pair of earrings doubling as speakers. Since it's not wireless, hacking into your "personal" network would require direct contact (much less stealthy).

    9. Re:Use Bluetooth by nigham · · Score: 1

      i think it'll become easier for hackers - just find a way to have skin contact and immediately get all sorts of information! girls are going to have a NICE time...

      --
      I don't want to read /. I want to go home and re-think my life.
    10. Re:Use Bluetooth by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Everything electronic radiates, it's just a matter of how sensitive your receiver and antenna combination are.

      Network leads are 'leaky' at best.

      This isn't my area of expertise, though I've seen them sweeping the building often enough to get an idea of how it works. Different methods, some are active (meaning they will transmit lots of output power and look for any response in nearby electrical components, inductive or some such, get a fingerprint and compare against a database of knowns.

      Others are simply passive with usually a discone antenna plugged in to a big grey box with lots of funky lights and switches. oooohhh shiny.

      In Canberra (Australia) HQ is tempested, the entire building that is. Imagine flyscreen embedded in windows, walls have weird mixtures of concrete, silver stuff, steel, concrete, more silver stuff, dead alien remains, then the final outer layers of concrete.
      (Ok, I'm joking about that second layer of silver stuff, it's not really there)

    11. Re:Use Bluetooth by dim5 · · Score: 0
      From the article:
      RedTacton works through shoes and clothing as well.

      Not only is access to any RedTacton device (in the pictures, a palm pilot) now accessable just by touching me, you don't even have to touch my skin. Imagine a RedTacton receiver on the floor spanning the doorway of a main entrance to a building (like the automatic door pressure plates in drug stores). Oh, the privacy issues.

      Maybe my tin-foil hat will protect me...

      --

      Is something burning?
      Oh, it's my karma.

  6. Premature Communicator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damm... just one more thing I have to worry about.

  7. Touching.....ew by savage1r · · Score: 0

    So basically if you were holding something in your hand that was using this technology, simply be touching a receptor you can transfer data to it? You know some sick bastard is going to go around using his wing wong as a contact point.

  8. Yes... it's perfectly safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Incidentally NTT requests that the press refer to the technology's dermatological side effects as "a healthy tan!" rather than "cooking"

    1. Re:Yes... it's perfectly safe by cooleyb1 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I was wondering if anyone else had a problem with transmitting information across the body. Ok, fundamental rules for using technology, leave the transfer of electricity to wires. Bodies, while excellent conductors, are not the safest method of transfer. Count me out, i dont like wires, but i dont like being a conduit either!

  9. I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No where in the article does it claim to "cool"

    1. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what's up with the "cool - human" Shit?

    2. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he means NTT's Cool.

  10. Re:MySQL not ACID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's interesting, but what the hell does it have to do with Human Area Networking?

  11. Get ready to say ... by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 5, Funny

    "No honey, you're not fat, you just have lots of bandwidth!"

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    1. Re:Get ready to say ... by Drantin · · Score: 4, Funny

      She's just her own WAN...

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    2. Re:Get ready to say ... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      When my wife sits around the WAN, she sits AROUND the WAN.

      Baby got net

      I like gig ethernet and I cannot lie!

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:Get ready to say ... by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      "Are you happy to see me or is that an OC-48?"

    4. Re:Get ready to say ... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, imagine; broadband using REAL BROADS!

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    5. Re:Get ready to say ... by adeydas · · Score: 1

      or rather, she is just her own man ;)

    6. Re:Get ready to say ... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, imagine; broadband using REAL BROADS!

      Nah, I'd like to see the conferences where they pick the most attractive women to model the tech though.

    7. Re:Get ready to say ... by Stradenko · · Score: 1

      I don't know how many times I've told those boys...never call chicks broads.

  12. Very nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    skan, skin area network:)

    Very Sci-fi.

  13. Let's see... by inertia187 · · Score: 5, Funny

    What do you call a Human Area Network that's by itself? HAN SOLO!

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Let's see... by simcop2387 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      thats got to be the worst pun i've ever seen on slashdot

    2. Re:Let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe, yeah, and when you are going solo, you always shoot first.

      wait, what are we talking about?

    3. Re:Let's see... by paul248 · · Score: 1

      Heh, I was about to post the same thing, but luckily I decided to search the comments first...

  14. We're not having sex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... we're putting together a local area network!

    1. Re:We're not having sex... by emag · · Score: 3, Funny

      This isn't an orgy, we're the infrastructure for a beowulf cluster...

      --
      "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
    2. Re:We're not having sex... by mauthbaux · · Score: 1

      Tough me just right and I'll send you a "file".
      Don't worry, norton should have gotten rid of the whole herpes thing.

      --
      "Operating systems suck: you're better off using only the BIOS" --trainsaw.com
  15. Porn,...... by m93 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Think of what we can now do with Electronic porn...

    1. Re:Porn,...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of a room full of people exchanging pr0n files by body contact is just disturbing.

    2. Re:Porn,...... by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Think of what we can now do with Electronic porn...

      Finally a way to combine the destructive power of computer viruses and biological viruses!

  16. Who would want this? by t-packages · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Who would want this? -t http://www.scrapbookingdirect.com/

  17. So not new tech by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Insightful
    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:So not new tech by bscott · · Score: 2, Informative

      And here - IBM Research - PAN
      And I'm pretty sure I read about it on Slashdot at the time, too, but darned if I can find it in a search now.

      Is NTT just sooo big that they can take on IBM in a patent fight; or is it a cross-licensing deal?

      I can think of a lot of applications for this if they can get it to fit into a Java Ring...

      --
      Perfectly Normal Industries
    2. Re:So not new tech by rchf · · Score: 1

      Slashdot reported on a MS patenting the "Body Bus" back on Jun 23, 2004. Looks like the big boys are dividing up the "body bus" standard amongst themselves.

      -Richard

  18. How many bytes can you get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in a static spark?

  19. Warning: by spankey51 · · Score: 5, Funny

    -Use 220V power sources only!
    -System WILL NOT function properly if flyback transformer output is BELOW 500 KV.
    -If bleeding from the ears or urinary tract occurs during use, consult medical assistance immediately.
    -DO NOT use in bathtub, shower, or rain.
    -Conditions of high humidity should be avoided as electrical arcing may occur between peripheral devices on user.
    -People with braces or a pacemaker should refrain from use of this product.

    --
    -ubuntu others as you would have others ubuntu you.
    1. Re:Warning: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      500KV could be safe, just needs really low amperage, you have had a static shock before right? the ones you feel are usually in the range of 5KV, so two orders of magnitude should be fine :)

    2. Re:Warning: by Biogenesis · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be "Conditions of low humidity"?

  20. Someday this won't be so cool.... by Foo-Barz · · Score: 0

    All this stuff going through your body can't be good. Got milk? Nope. But I got cancer! Yay!

  21. Mobile Phone data transfer by davejenkins · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The real drive behind this is the usage for mobile phones. Here in Japan, mobile phones have become the dominant data handling device. Phones here have the full rolodex, appointment calendar, mp3 player, as well as Final Fantasy/Tetris/CowboyNeal game-of-choice. There are adapters coming online now that will let people browse MSWord and Excel files via their mobile.

    But the drive here is a great social need: when groups go out to dinner, friends, co-workers, business partners, etc. there is always this 10-minute ritual where everyone has to call everyone else in the group, in order to capture their phone number and contact information. If NTT can issue phones where everyone trades this information by touching hands, then they have an edge over the others.

    Japanese protect their privacy vehemently, but are also information hoarders much greater than their US or EU equivalents. Phone rolodexes are huge-- people have every contact they met in the last 4 years (which is in the thousands if you work in Tokyo).

    1. Re:Mobile Phone data transfer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Where can I get this CowboyNeal's Game-of-Choice?

    2. Re:Mobile Phone data transfer by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not use bluetooth? You can send your contact info to everyone else fairly easy (I have my contact info in my phonebook on my Series60 phone and just have to select it and then option->send->via bluetooth).

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    3. Re:Mobile Phone data transfer by Kusunose · · Score: 1

      One word: Security.
      I don't want any bystander to receive my contact info.

    4. Re:Mobile Phone data transfer by m50d · · Score: 1

      Aren't the Japanese all uptight about physical contact? Or am I stuck in 1980?

      --
      I am trolling
    5. Re:Mobile Phone data transfer by Kanasta · · Score: 1

      actually, how this could be any faster than transferring via IR I don't know.

    6. Re:Mobile Phone data transfer by Threni · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about ALL Japanese people then you're certainly stuck somewhere.

    7. Re:Mobile Phone data transfer by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 1

      When someone tries to connect to your phone you have to enter a passcode and tell them the passcode and then authorize them to connect after they get the passcode correct. Bluetooth is encrypted on the transport layer so I don't see the issue.

      The range is limited to a few meters anyway. I walked 3 meters away from my cell phone with a bluetooth headset on and it lost the connection. If you are at a large table with friends only they should be in range. Plus you only have to turn bluetooth on for a few minutes while you are exchanging info and then you can turn it back off. No one can pull info from your phone either; you have to send it.

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    8. Re:Mobile Phone data transfer by m50d · · Score: 1

      Of course not all Japanese, but generally. I thought that physical contact was viewed as something probably equivalent to kissing or more in the west.

      --
      I am trolling
  22. The early adopters of every new tech.... by valdis · · Score: 4, Funny

    pr0n. After 10,000 years of leading technological innovation, they finally have a way to deliver it directly where it matters....

    1. Re:The early adopters of every new tech.... by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...if only there were some way to use physical congress as a means of conveying the actual sensations...

    2. Re:The early adopters of every new tech.... by metlin · · Score: 1


      Well, that's what real women are for, mate =)

    3. Re:The early adopters of every new tech.... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      who modded this insightful? only on slashdot would someone not realize that this was meant as a joke...

  23. Handshaking by xee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Could our PDAs swap business cards via a handshake? What will come next? VIRUSES?

    --
    Oh shit! I forgot to click "Post Anonymously"...
    1. Re:Handshaking by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I bet sex would result in better conductivity than handshakes, too. If that's the case, then having sex would put you at a greater risk of infection.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    2. Re:Handshaking by Skunkhead · · Score: 1

      This could really be a thing to change the meaning of a handshake. Say its good manners to let your PDA transmit your vcard as soon as it sees another one. When you dont want to give your address to someone, you dont shake your hands with them. Or you wear gloves all the time, and only take them off if you want to give out your data.

  24. Testacles?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell me they don't attach the contacts to the testacles?

    1. Re:Testacles?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its spelt testicles. Just call them balls, OK?

    2. Re:Testacles?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What goes in, must come out - testicles deviant to Fud's Law"

      Hmmm... Testacle. Ramshackle testacle? Certainly deviant.

  25. Re:MySQL not ACID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In their situation it would hardly hurt anything to go to an hour-old backup. Sounds like a poor backup strategy rather than some kind of database error.

    Btw, all of us idiots out here that have been using MySQL happily for years still aren't falling for the chicken little routine. The only time ACID is more than a luxury is when you can't afford to lose and hour or so of updates. In the real world (i.e., where screw ups happen all the time and the solutions are messy) not many applications need that kind of setup. Talk finance and stock markets all you want, but you're still talking the upper 10%. Who are using Oracle and whatnot anyway.

  26. Possibly... by esteric · · Score: 1

    Possibly for security. Anyone in range can recieve your wireless transmissions. With this, someone or something would have to be touching you to get any of that data. See their site for a couple of suggestions.

  27. MS already patented this, right? by MaskedKumquat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have to wonder if these patents will have a chilling effect on their ability to compete in the marketplace.

  28. Dammit. by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is so unfair. Cool-humans get everything. I knew I should have played football in highschool. And showered.

  29. after they plant chips in our heads by fishyfool · · Score: 1

    for "Liberty" and "Patriotic duty" all you have to do it touch the programmer. every morning...

    --
    Enjoy Every Sandwich
  30. Questions never to answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Does this network make my area look wide?"

  31. Good thing by aprosumer.slashdot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think this would be a good thing, since this technique would make it feasible to interface your 'preferences' (stored on a wearable computer) to various electronic or smart gadgets (a smart car/house/etc) so that as soon as you touch it, then the smart gadget is customized to you.

    I suppose a simple application, would be if all cars supported this, then as soon as you touched the door latch then: 1) The car door would open, since the car verified who you were. 2) The seat would adjust to your body height 3) The radio would automatically tune itself to your preferences 4) Your playlists would be imported into the radio.

    Your preferences can be stored in something relatively small. For example your watch can have this technology and it transmit your preferences to whatever smart gadget you touched.

    What would really be neat, is if there were some method of biofeedback so that you could configure your preferences by 'thinking about it'. At that point, we would have something similar to the "Ancient's 'Automated' Technology" as shown on StarGate: Atlantis tv show.

    1. Re:Good thing by Matt_Joyce · · Score: 1


      Ring, watch, braclet, earing, etc
      All achievable now.

      Affecting change in data, via thought, is a long way off.

  32. "safely"... by ABeowulfCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Once, smoking cigarettes was considered 'safe'. Putting radio waves thru the human body is never a great idea.

    1. Re:"safely"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once, drinking water was considered 'safe'. Typing out asinine analogies is never a great idea.

    2. Re:"safely"... by RabidChicken · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hate to break it to you, but you have thousands of "radio waves" (actually consisting of many different frequencies, there's nothing magic about radio) going through your body like it or not. If you can prove there's something wrong, then by all means, tell us, with a link, to a peer-reviewed source.

    3. Re:"safely"... by trs9000 · · Score: 1

      Yes, that reminds me of something my friend relayed to me. While he was speaking with an acquaintance, she said to him:
      "I don't like microwaves. I don't feel good about being near all those waves."
      And he replied: "What are you talking about? You're living in a microwave!"
      It's all around us, and indeed, in us, as you say. At all kinds of frequencies.
      Which is not to say its harmless or not. I just thought it was a perspective you don't hear as often.

    4. Re:"safely"... by bcmm · · Score: 1

      There is a space half way through your sig. Furthermore, Slashdot doesn't put it on a line on its own in the page source.
      Either of those will stop it from triggering any AV scanners.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  33. Does this mean... by emag · · Score: 1

    HAN synced first?

    --
    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
  34. Obligatory Beowulf comment by cybermancer · · Score: 1

    Just imagine a beowulf cluster of people!

    True all we have is bandwidth, but this is starting to cross the line between people and computers. If we learn a way to interface with the human brain through this system then the skys the limit!

    --
    "Anything is possible with enough programmers, time and pizza." (Substitute caffeine for time as needed.)
    1. Re:Obligatory Beowulf comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A whole new purpose for flash crowds!

  35. News Article on RedTacton by Sundroid · · Score: 2, Informative

    TechWorld.com has a fairly detailed article on RedTacton, in which it says this about the concern of electric shocks: "The transceivers, which require a PCMCIA card to connect with an electronic device, use several hundred milliwatts of power and are insulated to avoid electric shocks. As with many items of household electrical equipment, like TVs and kettles, the transceivers do emit very weak electromagnetic fields, but the levels are in compliance with guidelines issued by Japan's Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, NTT said." Interesting Read. I have the link to the article on my blog at: http://sundroid.blogspot.com/.

    1. Re:News Article on RedTacton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  36. Nice, but diseased by tomsuchy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This would probably be great for one's own devices (cell, palm) but using it for auths exposes the toucher to a variety of diseases, especially from public interfaces. People would probably be loathe to use this to pay for something, if they have to touch a contact point that's been touched by everyone before them.

    Also, there's the possibility that someone could pick up your auth sig from a handrail or doorknob or something... unless you have to enable the auth for something like the next transaction, or the next x seconds, or key in some kind of id that indicates which touch is authorized. That adds a level of complexity that defeats the whole point of the touch interface.

    --
    this isn't a sig. i type this (including the two dashes), every time i post, just to make it look like a sig.
    1. Re:Nice, but diseased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would probably be great for one's own devices (cell, palm) but using it for auths exposes the toucher to a variety of diseases, especially from public interfaces. People would probably be loathe to use this to pay for something, if they have to touch a contact point that's been touched by everyone before them.

      Doesn't this already constantly happen in real life? Doorknobs, taps, even the buttons you'd press to operate something like an ATM. It doesn't sound like anything new to have a public object that'll be touched by many people.

    2. Re:Nice, but diseased by Agret · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And the handle on your shopping cart hasn't been touched by everyone before you?

      --
      Have you metaroderated recently?
    3. Re:Nice, but diseased by Terrasque · · Score: 0

      "People would probably be loathe to use this to pay for something, if they have to touch a contact point that's been touched by everyone before them."

      You mean like doorknobs, handrails, shopping carts and similar?

      "Also, there's the possibility that someone could pick up your auth sig from a handrail or doorknob or something..."

      Challenge/response. No replay attacks. Pretty basic security stuff, really.

      --
      It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
    4. Re:Nice, but diseased by Matt_Joyce · · Score: 1


      I was going to say that.

      Door handles, public transport, money, taps, etc.

    5. Re:Nice, but diseased by Matt_Joyce · · Score: 1


      It would add a level of complexity, but that does not mean it can't be simple.

      As you suggested a 5 second windows of auth would be ample.
      That could be a ring, a button on your phone, in your clothing, a badge, a piece of jewelry etc.

      The point of the touch interface is not defeated by having to prime an auth.

      In a similar same way that passwords don't defeat the point of networks.

  37. Silly game technology=reality? (badly paraphrased) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "That's a PAN card."
    "Personal Area Network, huh..."
    "It's powered by the body's own electrical field. It transmits data using the salts in the body as a transmission medium..."

  38. Better than Biological Authentication. by stephenisu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The biggest market I see for this (other than the obvious marketing/spy novel stuff) is user authentication. People like myself fear bioauthentication because, well if someone steals your identity, you are pretty much boned.

    With this system, you can have a separate heavily encrypted key for each device you touch, and it can be changed if the need arises.
    Death to all passwords!

    You could know who entered each and every keystroke!

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
  39. oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now everytime my dog humps my leg, I have to do a full system check to make sure he didn't copy a DRM file from me...

  40. Take my HAND baby! by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 4, Funny

    So how long until I can purchase a Human Area Networking Device?

    Bring on the sex jokes now...

    1. Re:Take my HAND baby! by Eric604 · · Score: 1

      The question is: do you want to function as a hub or as a fileserver plugged into the hub together with many other Human Network Devices?

  41. Re:Paris Hilton Sidekick Hacked Photos and Phone N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Get birth control kill pill"

    She's not a virgin?

  42. Microsoft Patent? by Tellalian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Didn't Microsoft already patent something similar?

    Microsoft Patents The Human Body As A Network Bus

    1. Re:Microsoft Patent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might take care to notice that NTT is a Japanese company.

    2. Re:Microsoft Patent? by winterdrake · · Score: 1
      Bugger. There goes my post...ah well, might as well whore myself out by posting a link to the patent.

      Method and apparatus for transmitting power and data using the human body

  43. Tech Support by Rie+Beam · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can already hear the Tech Support calls...

    Support: "Hello?"
    Customer: "I'm having some trouble with my HAN. It's constantly dropping packets!"
    Support: "Well, what are you downloading?"
    Customer: "Would you believe me if I said 15GB of Lesbian videos?"
    Support: "Please hold."

  44. I am so gonna transfer using by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my penis.

  45. RedTacton enabled mouse by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seems to me that the obvious entry point is a new wireless optical mouse with this built in. Then you could buy (or it ships with) a memory unit that the user wears. Poof, instant computer usage...secure password storage, configuration data, small files of any kind.

    My two questions are:

    1) can I do a multidrop connection. There is precious little detail about whether my cell phone, pda, mp3 player, watch, HUD (hey I can dream) all play together seamlessly. If so this will kick so much ass.

    2) IIRC the field surrounding the human body is fairly unique to each person...can it be used as part of a biometric system through such a device. This seems kind of unlikely, but would be an interesting low security id system.

  46. Brings new meaning to the term... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    ..."flesh light". [shivers at the thought of what people will use to network with]

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Brings new meaning to the term... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was an old meaning?

    2. Re:Brings new meaning to the term... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yeah... It just used to be a troll "'euphemism" for a penis. How many times have we all seen this classic nugget: "Do me a favor and grab onto my flesh light"? But now, since the human body can be used for networking, that "flesh light" could be used as a trunk line in the truest sense of the word. Imagine carrying data and semen with the same pipe! The mind boggles.

  47. Pr0n-o-matic by gtoomey · · Score: 1

    As an added feature, it delivers 500 volts to the approprive area when watching "Paris Hilton Live!"

    1. Re:Pr0n-o-matic by lexiconographolologi · · Score: 0

      Speaking of that, there used to be an automated pr0n bot at phatmax.net: http://www.google.com/search?q=Pr0n-o-matic&start= 0&start=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

    2. Re:Pr0n-o-matic by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Yes ... something that sent me into a coma if I were forced to watch an episode of the "Simple Life" would be very beneficial!

      Think of it as a anti-interegation device ;)

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  48. Perfectly safe? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And we wonder way cancer is so rampant.

    1. Re:Perfectly safe? by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Because it used to be that something else would kill you first, but that's not so common these days?

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  49. Is this where I brag... by PornMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    about my fat pipe?

    1. Re:Is this where I brag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I said to yo mamma when I gave her that slashdotting last night.

    2. Re:Is this where I brag... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my momma is an ugly crack 'ho you sad fuker

  50. ...and for the paranoid... by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, when you put on your tinfoil hat, it will spark a little. This is normal operation.

  51. Not new by lma · · Score: 3, Informative
    Using human skin as the medium to conduct signals for communications is a concept that has been around for years. See for example this computer.org article (PDF).

    Someone else mentioned the Microsoft patent.

    The interesting thing about Microsft's patent is that it includes power, not just data.

    Larry

  52. Tapping? by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    I wonder if something like this could be tapped through clothing, by standing next to someone or simply shaking hands with someone. I would be very nervous using this to transmit vital information.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  53. Stay away from me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you may have a virus or worm?

    I wear gloves, because safe networking is the only way to go.

  54. Well... by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    I would not be surprised if this requires significantly less power than a wireless solution for its given amount of bandwidth.

    Also, this technology would give new meaning to the term "handshake."

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:Well... by Entropius · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not for its given bandwidth at its given range, however.

      Contact across the skin implies a range of ~1 meter; at that range the required emitted power for a clear wifi signal is on the order of microwatts.

  55. Uses what? by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was I the only one who misread that as:

    There is a pretty interesting site (uses flesh)

  56. Watch out for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    the testicular cross-talk! Ouch!

  57. hhmmmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty cool, until all users mysteriously die from some new form of cancer .... :)

  58. Is it wrong that... by TechnoPops · · Score: 1

    This made me think me and a few friends could possibly slashdot a server just by touching it, and that made me laugh evilly?

    --
    "Each time you smile, it'll only last awhile. Life may be scary, but it's only temporary."
  59. Bluetooth is fast but I could be linked in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.2 km with Antenna. So someone around you in 1.2 km zone could be getting the data.

    Most people don't know this. 100 metres in any direction someone can be linked in with out being targeted.

    Heck you can have a lot of fun Bluetooth jamming.

    At least this new tech reduces range.

  60. Man in the middle by _Laban_ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow, this gives the Man In The Middle attack a whole new meaning!

  61. You can't own information, dude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we just have to worry about people running past to touch you, in order to steal the photographs off your camera, or whatever.

    infringe the photos off your camera

  62. Shoes as a firewall? by chendo · · Score: 1

    Ever played with one of those toys that activate when you put them on the palm of your hand? This is the same concept. I was able to get twenty people to link up by holding hands, then activate said toy through twenty people. That said, it also works if you're barefoot on tiles. Yes, the current travels through the ground.

    So, do we have to wear shoes to make sure we leak any data?

    --
    Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
  63. hmmm.... by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

    and carry it with me?

    like my daddy did?

    if you dont get it, listen to some jim croche and come back :-)

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    1. Re:hmmm.... by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      You go to hell. You go to hell and you die.

      I've got "Operator", "Bad, Bad Leroy Brown", and "A long time ago" all going through my head AT THE SAME TIME!

      and I still don't know what you're talking about.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    2. Re:hmmm.... by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      ::chuckles::

      "I've got a name".... :-P

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  64. an exciting new way... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... to have cyber sex.
    Hey baby, howabout you get a few of your friends and we go make ourselves a beowulf cluster in my room.

    Better get some viagra. It looks like your network is down.

    I'm hot swappable!

    I can see the transcript from divorce court now;

    According to your server logs, at 1:15-1:48 AM you were connected and then not connected and then connected and then not connected and then connected and then not connected and then connected and then not connected and then connected and then not connected and then connected and then not connected and then connected... 245 times... Playing patty cake, were we?

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  65. The ongoing discussion reminds me of a movie by Moonelf · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen the movie Fallen?

    1. Re:The ongoing discussion reminds me of a movie by KiroDude · · Score: 1

      I was thinking exactly the same thing.... And, what if someone invited a device that could extract your memory (not erase it, just extract) and all your personal info... hmmm....

    2. Re:The ongoing discussion reminds me of a movie by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      Tiiiiime... is on my side.

      yes it is.

  66. just imagine by jessecurry · · Score: 1

    picking up a phone at your neighbor's house and having your entire address book available, or previous CID info.

    --
    Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
  67. Use your feet!!! by DigiMan · · Score: 1

    So, I don't get it... most humans I know only have 2 hands (that is, unless you come from New Jersey and played in the waste dumps as a kid)... So, if you're using your body to transmit a network signal, then HOW are you going to type, use the mouse, and operate your computer? Unless THIS is the reason they've been pushing all those VIAGRA spams recently :P) ( ...or we all take off our shoes and use our feet for networking so we can have our hands free for typing... Am I the only one who sees this problem???

    1. Re:Use your feet!!! by m50d · · Score: 1

      Type and use the mouse with two hands like normal. Have your ipod/camera/etc on the inside of your belt or a pendant round your neck so it's in contact with your skin.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Use your feet!!! by DigiMan · · Score: 1

      Ahhh... That makes a lot of sense... I guess I was just missing the application...

  68. better safe than sorry by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How do they know it's safe? Because they haven't done any tests to show it isn't safe? Because it doesn't fry their armhairs? Maybe it is safe, but why should we trust the vendors of the tech, who have no accountability, to say it is safe? We're just finding out about cellphones now, we've just started to find out about electrical fields and bone/cytoplasm growth, because all the vendors through history have said "it's safe", without testing.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:better safe than sorry by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation 0
      50% Insightful
      50% Troll

      Some people already know about this situation. And there are some people who don't want to know, don't want anyone to talk about it.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  69. Start of bionic combat man? by Gorimek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One fairly serious human limitation is the speed of nerve signals. There's about a 100 ms lag between the brain and the hand, longer for the feet.

    Not that that's not adequate for everyday life, but if the nerves could somehow be rewired to use this channel instead, reaction times could be seriously lowered with very interesting consequences in several different fields, such as sport, combat, driving or any other physical activity where speed matters.

    I realize this will not happen tomorrow, but OTOH I can't think of any fundamental reason that it's impossible.

    1. Re:Start of bionic combat man? by Fwonkas · · Score: 1

      Not only that -- you could grab a person's arm and make them tap dance.

      --
      COMPUTER! Whatever happened to Blueberry Muffin?
  70. Aside the sexual innuendo.. by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    This is a great way to pass data very secretly. All you'd need to do is touch someone and you transfer 10Mb/s.

    10Kb/s is plenty for secret messages.. and you have 2^10 times more than that to play with.

    Perfect for secret corporate data transfers (trading secret info), spy data, insider stock tips, trading public keys (or even one-time pads), or many other interesting "walk near me" data transfers.

    --
  71. multi-tasking by Nineteen.Eleven · · Score: 1

    So does this mean you can now download files while touching the hairless breasts?

  72. Excuse me... by rhythmx · · Score: 1

    while I whip my dongle out.

  73. hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sex could be fun, procreative, and a social networking device! wait.... it already is... well at least you could play a game of counterstrike mid-coitus... a network cable is unplugged local area connection established a network cable is unplugged local area connection established a network cable is unplugged local area connection established a network cable is unplugged local area connection established

  74. Personal Profit by cwt137 · · Score: 1

    I see court cases soon where people were unknowingly used for their bandwidth. Brings new meaning to the phrase "network backbone".

  75. New wave in product marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definite candidate for most exciting new product photo:

    http://www.redtacton.com/en/prototype/images/pic1- 3.jpg

  76. Someone has to say it by bonch · · Score: 1

    Brings new meaning to the term "meatport," doesn't it?

    1. Re:Someone has to say it by SeanJones · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that a datapipe in your pocket or are you just pleased to see me?

    2. Re:Someone has to say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha! Shame I have no mod points.

  77. mod up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    insightful.

  78. From 1995 at MIT by XNormal · · Score: 1

    See Intrabody Signalling from the MIT media lab.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    1. Re:From 1995 at MIT by OldeClegg · · Score: 1

      Yep, data exhange by touch was looked into quite some time ago at the Media Lab, and with not a small amount of media mention.

      Seems strange if folks don't remember this.

    2. Re:From 1995 at MIT by XNormal · · Score: 1


      Seems strange if folks don't remember this.


      Slashdotters? Most of them were probably too young to rememeber...

      --
      Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  79. kick-ass application by chazmims · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm just waiting till I can buy my new HAN watch with all my environmental preferences and ssh key hash. I'm imagining sitting at any computer and as soon as my hands touch the keyboard, it configures it the way I like it. Heck, at 10mbps, given sufficiently small storage, My hands could touch the keyboard and it could connect to the PC on my wrist for all the data and programs I take with me all the time. PC terminals will replace desktop PCs and even laptops. The PC becomes truely personal, something you don't even notice you're wearing until you need it. Daddy likes.

    --
    Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies.
    1. Re:kick-ass application by Berner · · Score: 1

      Yep, and as soon as you reach up to scratch your nose the screen goes blank and your watch beeps out a connection lost message.

  80. Antenna by T-Kir · · Score: 1

    My is that a big antenna, or are you just pleased to see me?

    ;-), not checked to see if someone else posted, but hey ho.

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
  81. interconnected body parts by arron_nz · · Score: 1

    Well, this could also be used (with a set of good protocols) as a method of communication between your headset and phone. Or from your monkey-chip-emplanted brain to your limbs. Maybe this could be the ultimate coming-of-age for wearable computing communication.

    --
    garble
  82. And it is since long known ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that you can get a virus by just shaking hands!

  83. The idea has been taken by JPriest · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry, I can remember reading about a patent filed years ago that did this exact thing. One of the ideas behind it was that if you had a PDA type device, you could exchange phone numbers/buisness cards etc. just by shaking hands. I am not sure of my exact source, but a quick google search turned up this published Oct. 1996.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:The idea has been taken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up, and see also this link. This idea was taken and patented already.

  84. I see by nahnkari · · Score: 0

    So what are we trying to achieve here? As soon as I touch my GF---the webcam starts up automatically ?

  85. Welcome back token-ring! by mmu_man · · Score: 1

    I knew it wasn't old technology :)

  86. Hackable Humans by El+Batemano · · Score: 1

    In time with development the human brain could be used as a massive data storage device for PC information. You could have fingerprint recognition on the PC itself and then download/upload vast amounts of information. All someone would have to do is touch you (easilydone in a crowded place) and give you a virus, take private inforamtion, or assimilate you like the borg... Resistance is futile... Here is an old link about Microsoft who already patented this technology... http://www.betanews.com/article/1088039192 Sorry, you'll have to copy and paste...

  87. /me playing "Dido - Take My Hand" by mmu_man · · Score: 1

    has a whole ne sense now :)

  88. Sci-Fi plot by Benoa · · Score: 1

    Funny, it looks like the "Fall of Hyperion" plot, in which humans are nothing but network relays. What are the odds that NTT guys have read the book ?

  89. A new use for tech support by SeanJones · · Score: 1

    Excellent, a new way for us suits to make tech support's life a misery. Suit: Er ... is that the computer thingy department Underpaid Tech: Yes ... what now? Suit: My LAN is down could you lot come up to my office, strip naked and lie on the ground holding each others' ankles so I can sync my PDA with Outlook. MWAHAHAHAHAHA

  90. Here's some links by SirSnapperHead · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    It's the year of Linux! To celebrate I have x free hotmail accounts to give away
  91. The return of sneaker net. by conteXXt · · Score: 1

    now if we all join hands will we have INTERNET2?

    --
    The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
  92. Doesn't MS have a patent on this? by Blitzenn · · Score: 1

    I thought there was an article several months ago that stated that Microsoft had been awarded a patent for transmitting data signals through the body? Am I wrong?

  93. Hate to intrude reality into the picture.... by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm, next time you're near an oscilloscope, try touching your finger to the input. Inspect the signal. Should be about 2 volts of 60 cycle hum, with maybe 10% ragged noise superimposed. Raise your other hand toward the ceiling lights-- the voltage should go up to maybe five volts of raggedy hash. Now touch something grounded-- the voltage should go down to maybe a tenth of a volt, now mostly high-frequency hash. It's unlikely your body is going to make a good data path. Ungrounded, it's a walking antenna for all kind of noise. Grounded, it's a pretty good short to ground. These folks are trying to make filet-mignon out of road-kill-- not very likely to succeed.

  94. great keys by fikx · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a good way to implement electronic keys for everything. Think of putting some small device on a neck lanyard or anywhere out of the way (as long as it touches skin) and using that for a key. Touch your car, it unlocks. Touch your PC and it logs in. No more dropping security badges or car keys when trying to get in!

    --
    AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
  95. Nuevo Age Hackers.. by digital.prion · · Score: 0

    And you thought that guy was just trying to feel you up.


    Hmph..

    --
    Smile.
  96. Biometrics and synchronization by BiDi · · Score: 1

    How about some worker that comes in the office to drop-off some sensitive data that he collected on the field, and just takes his Handheld in his hand, puts his finger on fingerprint reader and after authorization transfers his data into the system and get new data on Handheld from mainframe with one simple "touch of a fingerprint-reader button".

    No cards, no IDs, no security holes, just connect and transfer. Fingerprint is your password and body is your medium. Now this is what I call the future.

  97. Not to sound paranoid... by Antyrael · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... but if you read through the site, alot of the "suggested applications" seem to assume that the little "mobile device" you have on you stores an awful lot of personal information. Sitting down on a plane and it knows whether or not you're in the right seat? Reaching for medecine and an alarm going off because you grabbed the wrong one?

    It better be damned well encrypted, because I don't want to sit down on a park bench and suddenly the guy beside me knows exactly who I am and has access boatload of my personal information.

    Now, this is less of an issue if, say, my medicine bottles know that "Antyrael" not supposed to be using them, and my "portable device" just says "Hi, I'm Antyrael, what's up?", but that really doesn't sound feasable.

    So, I guess what I'm (long-windedly) saying here, is yes; these devices could certainly, shall we say, usher in a new "era" of secure authentication, since only your personal device activates your stuff. But, done wrong (and there are many ways this could be done horribly wrong), this could also spawn greater security risks than ever before.

    And what if someone STEALS your personal unit? Suddenly they can authorize themselves as you just by touching a doorknob/mouse/whatever? I shudder at the thought.

    </paranoia>
    --
    Expectations are for the unprepared.
  98. I don't think by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    there are any products out there that actually make use of "micro" 802.11 though, are there?

    The idea of this system seems to me to be like a "fast Bluetooth." 802.11 doesn't really lend itself to that kind of usage.

    --

    +++ATH0
  99. How about that : by dousk · · Score: 1

    Combine this with an expensive flash memory implant hidden somewhere cosy inside you : got yourself a nice courrier. Johnny Mnemonic style, woohoo! And they said it couldn't be done .....

  100. Now the government can put data on you.... by UlfGabe · · Score: 1

    without your knowledge. You could be a walking Tag with the details of your entire day, just picked up from the different door handles(as show on the site).

    walking home you touch the subway and BAM the information is sent to the secret government labs

    --
    Check journal for info on Anti-TextBook, an idea by me.
  101. bad images by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    She is her own MAN.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  102. TCP/IP/STD by cosinezero · · Score: 0

    Just think, you may not catch AIDS from shaking hands, but now you can catch SOBIG from it!

  103. Flood Ping? by JonnyBe · · Score: 1

    hmmmm...i wonder if it could be used for mood
    disorders.

  104. Try it with a spectrum analyzer by WillWare · · Score: 1
    What you're talking about is the very first experience anybody ever has with an oscilloscope. You're pretty much saying that a research team at a large Japanese electronics corporation has never been in an electronics lab in their lives, and yet said large corporation is ready to issue a press release about their work. I'm doubtful that's the case.

    With a little filtering, you can pretty easily find a frequency band where the noise floor is adequately low. And if noise is still a problem, use code modulation (ala CDMA). For long enough codes, it give very good noise immunity and you can slap an error-correcting code on top of that. Then there's all that stuff in the TCP protocol. Noticing and fixing flipped bits is a pretty thoroughly studied problem.

    --
    WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
    1. Re:Try it with a spectrum analyzer by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
      Issue press releases and lobby the govt for bandwith is exactly what the IP over power lines folks tried to do. And the noise issues there are much worse.

      Maybe it's just me, but my attitude has evolved to: "if it has to be advertised, it's probably not very good".

      Yes, one would want to use plenty of filters, error-detecting and correcting codes, a good modulation scheme, plus TCP/IP checksums and retries over that. The question is: how much thruput is left after all that redundancy; and how many volts do you have to pump through Joe Blow to get the signal up to a decent level above the noise; how well does it work in noisy environments, like when you turn on a vacuum cleaner, or your neighbor starts arc welding in her garage? They never seem to mention little details like that in press releases.

      Regards,

      A_H

  105. A whole new meaning for "virus" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yikes!

    Is there a static storage capacity?

  106. Legalities by gjbivin · · Score: 1

    So now would hacking into your network be considered assault?

  107. May I ... by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

    May I dock my Treo in your cradle?

    Do you mind if I put my mouse on your palm?

    Can I plug my peripheral into your box?

    etc. etc.

  108. I Already Have This... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    "a data transmission path at speeds up to 10 Mbps between any two points on the body"

    Just show me Paris Hilton's picture...

    Or Angelina Jolie...

    Or Sharon Corr...

    Or...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  109. worms by gotem · · Score: 1

    if you get infected by a worm you can actually feel your skin crawl

  110. Your Next Entry-level Job by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    The next entry-level job you'll see listed on monster: Be our file server. Job Requirements: All you have to do is hold a hard drive and touch the switch.

  111. I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    James Bond style hacking of the mainframe through the security guard.. I can see the headlines now "Defcon gets raised during Senate hearing".. Ok ok, bad joke. 8-|