It seems to me that people who really do the research end up publishing material that is recognized as conspiratorial, very right wing or very left wing.
Politically reporting reporting and discovery is such that doesn't 'rock the boat' or forms conclusions too 'off the wall'
Meaning: Is it more difficult to be scientifically convincing, or to create futuristic scenarios that are plausible?
You make a statement like that but don't post your conclusions after 'picking it apart'?
This article sounds more like a troll posting on a bbs somewhere.
It seems to me that people who really do the research end up publishing material that is recognized as conspiratorial, very right wing or very left wing.
Politically reporting reporting and discovery is such that doesn't 'rock the boat' or forms conclusions too 'off the wall'
I use mine all the time.... to read eBooks /:)
Again, the NYTimes only really cares about NYC. Since when did NYC reflect the United States?
Manhattan having some part of their infrastructure overloaded? Why should that be a surprise?
As for the rest of the country (except other major cities), we're doing just fine.