you're confused, this fights bloat on disk by letting kernel image be half the size and loading twice as fast (uncompression time is negligible, less than tenth of a second on a typical desktop)
it of course has many other uses but you can read the article to find out
invalid assumption that same thermometer even used at a station over the decades (with the huge gaps of years), and the time of measurement not known "morning" "noon" "evening"
building a house of cards on rubbish is what has been done
we don't even know if the same thermometer was used for the decades at each station (and there are gaps of years and decades), we don't know the time of measurement in half the cases ("morning", "evening")
you are the one who has failed stats 101 with your assumptions . look at the real data from say the US stations for 19th century the same thermometer wasn't used at a station, and there are gaps of years and sometime decades in records. Time of measurement wasn't even precise ("morning", "noon", "evening")
statistics become meaninlessl, but you show what the problem is
most of the thousands upon thousands of climate models are discarded. trivial to cherry pick one that matches past events, that's called "cooking the books". Note the models and approved from ten years ago have been proven to be complete rubbish. we can't model climate, we've proven that. And the IPCC has been backpedalling on its dire predictions with every report to the UN in the last 15 years
you are very funny, you imagine people are going to stand in place for over a century while the ocean rises few millimeters a year? what is the lifetime of typical house or office building?
sure, but that's hardly a decent grid. Have you seen the records from that time for USA and UK, they are online. Time of temperature taking sometimes just "morning, noon, evening", gaps of years or even decade at station....most the data is thrown own, small percentage used
no, those spirit and mercury filled thermometers not accurate at all, even if you spent hundreds of dollars on one now it would come with "calibration sheet" graph that would tell you the amount to subtract or add for each reading. those go to tenths of a degree plus or minus.
Slashdot Mirror
what he writes is impossible to do (run intel code on ARM), so we gave him the possible and easy
you're confused, this fights bloat on disk by letting kernel image be half the size and loading twice as fast (uncompression time is negligible, less than tenth of a second on a typical desktop)
it of course has many other uses but you can read the article to find out
talk about hobby with archaic systems, honey bees are found in fossil record 30+ million years ago
he was asking us for the plan
of course on ebay old stuff can be had where the shipping cost is more than the item
plenty of useful languages in acadamia and the world don't have nor need a BNF grammar
eh? beagleboard and raspberry pi can't run x86 software, those are different ARM based systems
there are sound blaster 16 emulating drivers for windows, and various VM technologies have them
plenty of virtual machine tech can emulate old video, old hard drives, etc.
plenty of machines can be put into legacy device mode in BIOS, I've run os/2 warp on modern machines for business reasons
invalid assumption that same thermometer even used at a station over the decades (with the huge gaps of years), and the time of measurement not known "morning" "noon" "evening"
building a house of cards on rubbish is what has been done
bad assumption the same thermometer used for decades at a station, there are gaps of years and sometimes more than decade per station
you are silly thinking "statistics and physics" can overcome that
we don't even know if the same thermometer was used for the decades at each station (and there are gaps of years and decades), we don't know the time of measurement in half the cases ("morning", "evening")
wrong, for periods of millions of years it is known that co2 rises AFTER warming
you are the one who has failed stats 101 with your assumptions
. look at the real data from say the US stations for 19th century the same thermometer wasn't used at a station, and there are gaps of years and sometime decades in records. Time of measurement wasn't even precise ("morning", "noon", "evening")
statistics become meaninlessl, but you show what the problem is
most of the thousands upon thousands of climate models are discarded. trivial to cherry pick one that matches past events, that's called "cooking the books". Note the models and approved from ten years ago have been proven to be complete rubbish. we can't model climate, we've proven that. And the IPCC has been backpedalling on its dire predictions with every report to the UN in the last 15 years
you are very funny, you imagine people are going to stand in place for over a century while the ocean rises few millimeters a year? what is the lifetime of typical house or office building?
right, anyone on the unemployment line can do job that require years of systems admin and software development experience
your thinking is just part of the simulation, therefore you aren't really
"I'm not overweight, that's Higgs crushing you feel!", she said
sure, but that's hardly a decent grid. Have you seen the records from that time for USA and UK, they are online. Time of temperature taking sometimes just "morning, noon, evening", gaps of years or even decade at station....most the data is thrown own, small percentage used
because they owned the western hemisphere at the time including north and south america? oh wait, they did not.
wrong, they are not filtered out, instead a correction factor is applied
alarmist nonsense is not to be taken seriously, nor money wasted on generating more of same
more like, there just weren't enough of them with recorded measurements to say anything about the globe
also they weren't located in heat islands as more than half of today's are, that's for sure
no, those spirit and mercury filled thermometers not accurate at all, even if you spent hundreds of dollars on one now it would come with "calibration sheet" graph that would tell you the amount to subtract or add for each reading. those go to tenths of a degree plus or minus.