Slashdot Mirror


User: rubycodez

rubycodez's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10,921
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10,921

  1. Re:Emoji? on Unicode 7.0 Released, Supporting 23 New Scripts · · Score: 1

    your assertion the characters don't exist is provably false. chat software produces them, hundreds of millions of people use them

  2. Re:Middle finger on Unicode 7.0 Released, Supporting 23 New Scripts · · Score: 1

    ok, so we have a character for fuck you, but none for fucking? most of us wouldn't be here but for the fucking.

  3. Re:Strike out on Unicode 7.0 Released, Supporting 23 New Scripts · · Score: 1

    you've obviously never typed in "bananamobile" in google image search

  4. Re:Klingon in more useful on Unicode 7.0 Released, Supporting 23 New Scripts · · Score: 1

    the problem is there is no klingon alphabet to add, just several fan made lists claiming to be that

    so your advocating adding an act of fanservice to a fictional language by adding something to unicode for which the authors of the fiction themselves haven't even been arsed to make. that's beyond silly, that's like saying the next space shuttle should be shaped like the starship enterprise.

  5. Re:Deep sleep ... a few watts ... on Cable Boxes Are the 2nd Biggest Energy Users In Many Homes · · Score: 1

    so 35W cable box draw (if you had one) for the 2 or three people in your 500W / person house seems to be negligible, which was my point

  6. Re:Urban Dictionary on The FBI's Jargon List: Internet Acronyms Galore · · Score: 5, Informative

    the Urban Dictionary says FBI can mean "Fucking Bunch of Idiots"

  7. Re:pure rubbish on Cable Boxes Are the 2nd Biggest Energy Users In Many Homes · · Score: 1

    not at all, the point was the article contained meaningless sensationalist rubbish that was aped by the submitter of the article to slashdot. Tell me what purpose does the sentence about a non-existent 500W power consumption and comparison to washing machines perform?

  8. Re:I've been saying this for years. on Are US Hybrid Sales Peaking Already? · · Score: 1
  9. Re:Deep sleep ... a few watts ... on Cable Boxes Are the 2nd Biggest Energy Users In Many Homes · · Score: 1

    it is rounding error, you are not an engineer. Average continuous power draw per citizen in the USA is over 1.4 KW, and your 35 watts gets divided by 2.6 for per capita consumption

  10. Re:Here's an idea... on Cable Boxes Are the 2nd Biggest Energy Users In Many Homes · · Score: 2

    there is no 500 W draw, that's a lie

  11. Re:pure rubbish on Cable Boxes Are the 2nd Biggest Energy Users In Many Homes · · Score: 1

    good idea, they would make excellent machine gun fodder for Columbia's armed forces

  12. Re:pure rubbish on Cable Boxes Are the 2nd Biggest Energy Users In Many Homes · · Score: 1

    you are funny, the utter BS right before that was:

    "Cheryl Williamsen, a Los Alamitos architect, has three of the boxes leased from her cable provider in her home, but she had no idea how much power they consumed until recently, when she saw a rating on the back for as much as 500 watts — about the same as a washing machine."

  13. Re:Yup-article is BS on Cable Boxes Are the 2nd Biggest Energy Users In Many Homes · · Score: 1

    I did read the article, here is what we're complaining about:

    Cheryl Williamsen, a Los Alamitos architect, has three of the boxes leased from her cable provider in her home, but she had no idea how much power they consumed until recently, when she saw a rating on the back for as much as 500 watts — about the same as a washing machine.

    which is irrelevant rubbish, that box does not consume 500 watts

  14. Re:pure rubbish on Cable Boxes Are the 2nd Biggest Energy Users In Many Homes · · Score: 0

    most people live with others, average is 2.6 per household, so your single life power draw doesn't mean much.

    I wonder, do you waste all that saved energy from efficient lighting running your computer and monitor all night jacking to porn?

  15. Re:Deep sleep ... a few watts ... on Cable Boxes Are the 2nd Biggest Energy Users In Many Homes · · Score: 1

    sure it is, doesn't matter if one or fifteen watts, won't matter at all compared to all else american household is using, it's a rounding error

    and as I've stated elsewhere, the boxes don't pull 500 watts running, not even a third of that

  16. Re:huh on Cable Boxes Are the 2nd Biggest Energy Users In Many Homes · · Score: 2

    don't worry, the article is false and architect is an idiot who knows nothing about electronics

  17. pure rubbish on Cable Boxes Are the 2nd Biggest Energy Users In Many Homes · · Score: 1

    rating on back is not power draw, you might get close to that during startup. normal draw is less than 140 watts, put it in standby and get 15 watts

    I once worked in engineering group that also had couple of architects, we called them "farcitechs" and now you all know why

  18. Re:Networking 101 on The Nightmare On Connected Home Street · · Score: 1

    wrong, they are indeed lazy and stupid because at prior places I've worked the workforce was not full of such

  19. Re:they'd better pay on Hackers Ransom European Domino's Customer Data (including Favourite Toppings) · · Score: 1

    only if its with pepperoni. *drool* I mean, they'd better pay or weirdos will be exposed!

  20. Re:Water is wet on Bill Gates To Stanford Grads: Don't (Only) Focus On Profit · · Score: 1

    you are funny, most scientists work for corporations. most the rest are funded by those big businesses known as schools.

  21. Re:Water is wet on Bill Gates To Stanford Grads: Don't (Only) Focus On Profit · · Score: 1

    nonsense, profit being the primary goal is what has driven civilization and progress

  22. Re:Water is wet on Bill Gates To Stanford Grads: Don't (Only) Focus On Profit · · Score: 1

    you are funny, the lives saved and years added far outweigh the sum of all wars

  23. Re:Water is wet on Bill Gates To Stanford Grads: Don't (Only) Focus On Profit · · Score: 1

    not relevant, you ISP seeks profit. so did the makers of your computers and so did your phone or cable company

  24. Re:Water is wet on Bill Gates To Stanford Grads: Don't (Only) Focus On Profit · · Score: 0

    because the sale and use of medical imaging equipment isn't profitable at all. nor is your educational institution.

    grow up

  25. they'd better pay on Hackers Ransom European Domino's Customer Data (including Favourite Toppings) · · Score: 5, Funny

    or the names of those sick and twisted anchovy lovers will be revealed to the world, and where will they hide their faces then?