but it only depends on how HP views the market, 80-90 percent of HP Itanium do so to run Oracle on "big unix" . Your power and mining companies that are bound to it may not be enough of a chunk to influence HP. The big "energy" company I used to contract for used IBM Mainframe software for their fleet of power and natural gas production plants.
eh, the speed of a vehicle at a given horsepower is going to depend on drive train gear ratios, air resistance, hydraulic losses (if such in drivetrain and not lockup version) and friction losses to a first approximation.
the additions of hadron collider and zombies is more interesting, and I'm making a slashdot version with Natalie Portman thrown into the mix. Spock and the zombie and the lizard are going to be so pleased......
so what is the maxtrix of which trump which? is it perfectly balanced win/lose so there is no advantage to any one shape, otherwise the lizard and spock additions can't be allowed.
not true, there are some unions comprised of very nice people out there who value workmanship and professionalism. IAHFIAW and IBEW were wonderful people to work with, for example
Moreover, also in that article, DT fusion produces alpha particle and neutrons. Only the alpha would be blocked by tinfoil you imagine would shield. the neutron field is quite dangerous. All working fusor types make neutrons, the aneutronic boron-hydrogen or lithium reactor is quite out of reach of current technology
nonsense, you are confused, those committees you name are part of the problem, they are building the police state and are corporate fascists in the pockets of large corporations
Slashdot Mirror
it is needed for users of proprietary apps that have hp-ux-isms in them. these will be apps that move money and have man-decades of code in them
not an issue, HP has already said OpenVMS is dead, support only from now on
Meg said in June 2012 HP/UX will be ported to x86
seems obvious HP is planning on killing Itanium totally, soon
big problems with that, there are 3rd party proprietary wares in there, it can never be fully open sourced
Alphas for VMS were sold until 2007, so plenty of big companies will be using non-Itanium OpenVMS for about 10 more years
no, the Itanium did have impressive specs for certain kinds of computations, database and vector numeric. but that's five+ years ago
sure it is Linux. Linux is just a kernel, what is this talk of what OS it is?
no, that emulation project was a failure, needed software modules because the hardware in the itanic had issues, could do pentium II speeds
Linux on Itanium doesn't use x86 mode
oh it's already ported in HP's labs, Meg Whitman said it would happen last June 2012
pfft, you haven't been around. SCO Open Desktop was the very worst.
but it only depends on how HP views the market, 80-90 percent of HP Itanium do so to run Oracle on "big unix" . Your power and mining companies that are bound to it may not be enough of a chunk to influence HP. The big "energy" company I used to contract for used IBM Mainframe software for their fleet of power and natural gas production plants.
what!!??? The mainstream COBOL compilers have been available on Linux for over a decade: MicroFocus COBOL and Fujitsu NetCOBOL,
where I live country, state and county take in way, way more taxes than the roads require
when HP/UX x86-64 port is out, then Itanium2 will be dead
of course, once a good number of people plug in instead of paying the petro tax, guess what the government will do then?
it is super duper, if you have a front tire failure.
eh, the speed of a vehicle at a given horsepower is going to depend on drive train gear ratios, air resistance, hydraulic losses (if such in drivetrain and not lockup version) and friction losses to a first approximation.
uh huh, gas stations around me sell 100+ octane stuff, sticker on pump says "off-road use only"....hah!
the additions of hadron collider and zombies is more interesting, and I'm making a slashdot version with Natalie Portman thrown into the mix. Spock and the zombie and the lizard are going to be so pleased......
yes, a continuously powered non-ballistic trajectory. possible with alternative technologies to chemical fuel rockets
so what is the maxtrix of which trump which? is it perfectly balanced win/lose so there is no advantage to any one shape, otherwise the lizard and spock additions can't be allowed.
not true, there are some unions comprised of very nice people out there who value workmanship and professionalism. IAHFIAW and IBEW were wonderful people to work with, for example
good, justice served. usually I'm on the employee's side of things, but perp committed a crime, it's stealing, sabotage and extortion to do that
No, you are ignorantly believing headline hype. That "breakeven" event actually was 1.8 MegaJoules of energy causing 1.4 kilojoles of energy to be released. in other words, 0.0077 the energy of input. look it up -> http://news.sciencemag.org/physics/2013/10/fusion-breakthrough-nif-uh-not-really-%E2%80%A6
Moreover, also in that article, DT fusion produces alpha particle and neutrons. Only the alpha would be blocked by tinfoil you imagine would shield. the neutron field is quite dangerous. All working fusor types make neutrons, the aneutronic boron-hydrogen or lithium reactor is quite out of reach of current technology
nonsense, you are confused, those committees you name are part of the problem, they are building the police state and are corporate fascists in the pockets of large corporations
you are ignorant, those other "democracies" don't have a Bill of RIghts such as the USA has