Slashdot Mirror


User: rubycodez

rubycodez's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10,921
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10,921

  1. Re:Instead of killing the world five times on Nuclear Arms Cuts, Supported By 56% of Americans, Would Make the World Safer · · Score: 1

    tsunamis? no. earthquakes would be from an underground burst, a R 7.2 is about a megaton of energy. but a BIG quake like an 8.5 would be out of reach of deployable weapons (85 megatons).

    my ignorance? you're the one with hollywood script ideas, you're scaring yourself.

  2. Re:Instead of killing the world five times on Nuclear Arms Cuts, Supported By 56% of Americans, Would Make the World Safer · · Score: 1

    no, the typical weapon doesn't have the yield to take out a large city. there are exceptional weapons that have been tested that can do that (e.g. castle bravo, tsar bomb) but they aren't deployable on missiles

  3. my perspective? I post such things to get people to think about the mentality behind nuclear arsenals, and the reality that a nuclear war IS a thinkable thing to the military.

    My own opinion is that any kind of bomb is a cowardly weapon; nuclear ones especially.

  4. yes, much more can be destroyed with ten 100kt bombs spaced appropriately, less energy wasted.

  5. if air burst there is no fallout. long term problem solved.

            if ground burst, one megaton of yield will make about 90,000 curies of strontium 90, or about 100,000 curies of long lived stuff. Chernobyl released about 220,000 curies of strontium 90....note things grow there and animals live. so a thousand weapons can mess up a large country, but not kill everyone, too many square miles and too few bombs

  6. Re:Safer? on Nuclear Arms Cuts, Supported By 56% of Americans, Would Make the World Safer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    make the number too small and the odds of "winning" (elite survive) become attractive despite downsides.

  7. Re:Safer? on Nuclear Arms Cuts, Supported By 56% of Americans, Would Make the World Safer · · Score: 3, Informative

    that is absolutely a false statement, the USA does not possess enough warheads to kill every human on the planet, let alone every living thing. a thousand weapons could not even kill 80% of the people in a large country like Russia or China or India; too many cities, not enough bombs.

    you watch too much Hollywood and have an exaggerated notion of what nuclear weapons can do

  8. Re:Unique names for nearby stars on Astronomers Discover Third-Closest Star System To Earth · · Score: 1

    many of the visible ones already each have multiple names. make all the names you like, it doesn't matter.

    Polaris, UMi, Ursae Minoris, Alpha Ursae Minoris, North Star, Northern Star, Pole Star, Lodestar, Guiding star

    Barnard's star, Barnard's Runaway Star, Greyhound of the Skies, Proxima Ophiuchi, Velox Barnardi

    Alpha Centauri, Rigel Kentm, Rigil Ken, Toliman, Bermbermgle

    Betelguese, Alpha Orionis, Alpha Ori

    Vega, Wega, Lucida Lyrae, Alpha Lyrae

    Tau Ceti, Durre Menthor, Tertia Struthionum

    Spica, Azimech, Spica Virginis, Alaraph, Dana, Virgini

  9. Re:Andromeda "collision" is more scary on Astronomers Discover Third-Closest Star System To Earth · · Score: 1

    The current estimate is about 4 billion years. see wikipedia article on the subject. according to latest simulations, there is 50% chance the sun and its planets would be thrown three times the current distance from the galactic core, and a 12% chance the solar system would be ejected altogether. but this would have no effect on the planet's orbit around the Sun, the solar system would probably be undisturbed. long before then, expansion of the sun will cause the earth to be too hot for liquid water, in about 1.4 billion years. likely too hot for creatures like us and most animals/plants in 400 million years assuming we don't change into something else. amazing we can even study and analyze such concepts!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andromeda%E2%80%93Milky_Way_collision

  10. you are thinking war with Russia is impossible now? 1,000 is not enough against them.

  11. Re:Instead of killing the world five times on Nuclear Arms Cuts, Supported By 56% of Americans, Would Make the World Safer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    where do you get the absurd idea that nuclear weapons could even kill all the population once? Hollywood?

  12. Re:Let me fix that for you... on Why All the Higgs Hate? It's a 'Vanilla' Boson · · Score: 1

    shouldn't have left grand unified field theory out of that list: how does gravitation fit in with strong/electroweak force?

    in a perhaps related question, how are the values of dimensionless physical constants realized in the universe?

  13. Re:Let me fix that for you... on Why All the Higgs Hate? It's a 'Vanilla' Boson · · Score: 1

    "with not much on the horizon in terms of applications or fundamental discoveries"

    what nonsense, the Standard Model does not address:
    natural of dark matter and other exotic matter
    reason for abundance of matter over antimatter
    nature of cosmic inflation, dark energy
    nature of gravitation, relationship to general relativity if quantized
    source of dark flow
    quantum vacuum effect on expansion of universe
    CMB obversed properties not in agreement with theory
    are there magnetic monopoles?
    neutrino rest mass
    source of ultra-high energy cosmic rays

  14. Re:Let me fix that for you... on Why All the Higgs Hate? It's a 'Vanilla' Boson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    nonsense, the list of what is unanswered is long

      there are HUGE things on the horizon for fundamental discoveries in physics.

    nature and composition of dark matter
    is there a relationsip between gravity and strong / electroweak forces?
    can general relativety be combined with quantum theory?
    nature and source of cosmic inflation
    source of baryon asymmetry, more matter than antimatter

    and about a dozen more...

  15. Re:Already Wrong and it's only 2013 on Why All the Higgs Hate? It's a 'Vanilla' Boson · · Score: 0

    The rules of the English language are inconsistent, complex, and in many cases only recently standardised in the last 200 years. Your abilities as a scientist must be sub-par if you hadn't noticed.

  16. Re:Memory on Scientists Have Re-Cloned Mice To the 25th Generation · · Score: 1

    what a silly misconception you have. a clone is merely a sibling, like a twin. a clone has no memories whatsoever of the donor

  17. Re:Rabbit eggs on Scientists Have Re-Cloned Mice To the 25th Generation · · Score: 1

    you have a misconception, women do not "produce one egg a month". A women is born with all the eggs she'll ever have in her ovaries. Normally one of them is released a month after puberty, but there are ways of stimulating the release of more or of getting more

  18. Re:Summary seems to imply Dolly's cloning was flaw on Scientists Have Re-Cloned Mice To the 25th Generation · · Score: 1

    that's where Mary went; Dolly was sure to go

  19. Re:CS is not IT / desktop / severs / networking on US CompSci Enrollment Leaps For 5th Straight Year · · Score: 1

    true, but guess what type of jobs the graduates apply?

  20. Re:Who? on Lucas Says Ford, Fisher and Hamill May Return For Next Star Wars · · Score: 1

    you're confused, that was just the Romanized spelling of Galactic Basic name in the credits.

            Corran: "Do any of you speak Basic?"
            Zun-qin: "I speak your infidel tongue. It tastes like the waste excretions of an ill vhlor on my tongue, but I can speak it. Please, ask me something so I may deny it to you."

  21. Re:Who? on Lucas Says Ford, Fisher and Hamill May Return For Next Star Wars · · Score: 1

    she had a nice pair of cannons back in the day

  22. Re:As an Arizona resident on Is Daylight Saving Time Worth Saving? · · Score: 1

    nonsense, I live in the north and find Daylight Saving to be a waste of resources and time with no purpose.

    everyone with a brain, sign the new whitehouse petition to get rid of this nonsense once and forever: http://wh.gov/fh4k

  23. Re:Who? on Lucas Says Ford, Fisher and Hamill May Return For Next Star Wars · · Score: 1

    funny you'd think there would be a correct spelling in roman letters, for the english tongue, of a name from millions of years ago in a galaxy millions of light-years away. We could mispell it in Aurebesh....

  24. Re:Ford? on Lucas Says Ford, Fisher and Hamill May Return For Next Star Wars · · Score: 1

    well of course, the thing ended in 1983 why would Ford wait around for 16 years.....and then it started up again with horrific sequels

  25. Re:It's a trap! on Lucas Says Ford, Fisher and Hamill May Return For Next Star Wars · · Score: 1

    drinking? she likes cocaine, even in the days of acting for Star Wars.