Slashdot Mirror


Lucas Says Ford, Fisher and Hamill May Return For Next Star Wars

93,000 writes "According to Yahoo, George Lucas has let slip that Han, Leia and Luke will return for the next Star Wars installment. From the article: 'Lucas backtracked, saying, "Maybe I’m not supposed to say that. I think they want to announce that with some big whoop-de-do, but we were negotiating with them." Then he tried to cover his tracks: "I won’t say whether the negotiations were successful or not."'"

253 comments

  1. Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Massacrifice · · Score: 5, Funny

    Luke, Han, Lea, Gweedo, hell, they can bring back the goddamn Ewoks if they want, as long they keep George Lucas himself out of the crew, they'll be fine.

    I haven't healed from Howard the Duck yet.

    --
    -- Home is where you eat your heart out.
    1. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by p0p0 · · Score: 0

      DuckTits (oooh ooooh)

    2. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by smash · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      +1 informative

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    3. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by physburn · · Score: 0

      Would fail the meta moderation.

    4. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Jerslan · · Score: 1

      Are you new here?

    5. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Are you?

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    6. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Arancaytar · · Score: 4, Funny

      George Lucas promised that this time Jar Jar Binks would shoot first.

    7. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jenna Fisher is young enough, but Dorothy Hamill and Faith Ford would be too old.

    8. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      It's Henry Ford

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    9. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1, Funny

      Are you?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    10. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Actually, they'll have one of the roles being played by a Ford car.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    11. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      It's Henry Ford

      Clever. :)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    12. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by RLiegh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why yes, sir, I am.

    13. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by SeaFox · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hooray!
      Jar Jar Bink will be shot first!

      * rereads sentence *

      oh... wait. :-(

    14. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aww that was georgie-boy's best movie ever!

    15. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Noughmad · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't mind seeing Ford Prefect in this movie.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    16. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by mcneely.mike · · Score: 0

      Except Lucas would have him towel-less.

      --
      soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
    17. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any chance some hungry ewoks could just eat Jar Jar and get it over with?

    18. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by MatrixCubed · · Score: 2

      Greedo. He wasn't Italian, he was a Rodian.

    19. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DuckTits (oooh ooooh)

      He remembered those so you didn't have to....

    20. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by highUSERIDnewguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why yes, sir, I am.

      Hey guys what's going on in this thread?

    21. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by feandil · · Score: 1

      Score:5, Insightful
      ???
      seriously guys?

    22. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by jamiesan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they named the dog Harrison.

    23. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by mister_playboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      We're showing off our liver spots.

      Looks like I'll be in the "old half" of /. users soon enough... :)

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    24. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I haven't healed from Howard the Duck yet.

      Yeah, seeing Lea Thompson in her underwear made me feel a bit ... funny ... as a kid too.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    25. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Aren't Rodians all gangsters though? There's some Unfortunate Implications there.

      http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/PlanetOfCopyhats

      The Star Wars Expanded Universe uses this aggressively. With only three movies worth of content to start off with, writers had to create entire races based on minor extras that happened to have unique make-up.

      The most Egregious example? The Bothans. Their only appearance in the movies is Mon Mothma's line in Return of the Jedi: "Many Bothans died to bring us this information." From that single, offhand mention, EU writers whipped up an entire species whose entire society is based around spying and espionage.

      Star Wars has another Egregious example in Corellians, which is Han Solo's home culture. During the scene in the asteroid field in The Empire Strikes Back, Han says "Never Tell Me The Odds", and from this some EU writer extrapolated that all Corellians hate statistics with a passion.

      It's the same in Star Trek. All Ferengi are greedy and unprincipled, all Klingons are violent, all Vulcans are clever but a bit machine like and brittle and so on. Importantly all the non human races are inferior politically and morally to humans in the long run - even the Vulcans start of running things but end up as science officers in a human run and founded Starfleet.

      David Irving - who someone once called 'not just a historian of Nazis but a Nazi historian'- said sarcastically he liked Lord of the Rings because it teaches children about race.

      Of course like always he's trolling. He knows the people who wrote Star Trek and Star Wars weren't racists or Nazis and that JRR Tolkien loathed the Nazis. Rather he's using the prevalence of lazy "planet of the hats" writing in sci fi and fantasy to make a subversive and rather nasty ideological point that those writers didn't intend to make.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    26. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Star Wars/Transformers crossover fiction. Abrams and Bay together at last. Gratuitous lens flares that EXPLODE IN YOUR FACE!!!!

      --
      +1 Disagree
    27. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Whippersnapper!

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    28. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Amazing+Proton+Boy · · Score: 1

      I want to play too!

    29. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by xevioso · · Score: 1

      Frosty? If it's frosty you need to get that checked out.

    30. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Dareth · · Score: 1

      you win ;) yours is smaller

      --

      I only look human.
      My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    31. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by helix2301 · · Score: 1

      They should make the vector prime book into a movie if they can get all the cast back. They can add Maria (Luke's Wife) and Han and Lea kids into the mix would be a great movie one I would go see. I would like to see maybe a jedi academy movie as well.

    32. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by derfy · · Score: 1

      you win ;) yours is smaller

      Said no woman anywhere.

    33. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Henry Ford

      But will older brother Harrison be back?

    34. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Just wait for the remastered version.

    35. Re:Keep Granpa Lucas Out by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      (You folks have no idea what a pain it was to get round the filter to post that...)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  2. oh awesome by smash · · Score: 3, Funny

    I await the space equivalent of whatever the title of that travesty of an imitation Indiana jones movie was that I wasted $15 on to see in the cinema.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    1. Re:oh awesome by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      I await the space equivalent of whatever the title of that travesty of an imitation Indiana jones movie was that I wasted $15 on to see in the cinema.

      The sad part is that they delayed it all those years because they were waiting for the right script to come along.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:oh awesome by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      Well, it was delayed all those years because Lucas kept insisting on putting aliens in the movie, while Spielberg and everyone else refused because aliens in a Indiana Jones movie would be stupid beyond belief.

      I guess Lucas can say they were "waiting for the right script to come along" with a straight face, since that can be loosely translated as "I wanted aliens in the script, Steven didn't, so we had to wait for the right script that made both of us happy"

    3. Re:oh awesome by jadv · · Score: 0

      Trying to make everyone happy is an exercise in futility. Steven Spielberg, George Lucas, the audience. Pick two.

    4. Re:oh awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that Steven Spielberg directed *Close Encounters of the Third Kind* and *E. T. The Extra-Terrestrial*, right? I don't think George Lucas was the only one who wanted aliens there.

    5. Re:oh awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Spielberg was quoted to say that he already did his alien moves, and wasn't interested in making more.

    6. Re:oh awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankfully, I never did spend that kind of money to see it in the cinema. But I did spend money on cable and have tried to watch it a total of 3 times now. I've fallen asleep before seeing the ending every time (for some reason it was always on TV late). So, I've probably wasted close to $15 trying to watch it. Even though I understand the concept of a "sunk cost", I still feel robbed.

    7. Re:oh awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      James Cameron directed Aliens and Avatar, but that doesn't mean we should assume he wanted to put aliens in Titanic.

  3. reboot? by hguorbray · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hopefully this will allow for an Abrams style reboot of the franchise as has been done with Star Trek and pass the torch to new young actors who can hopefully age gracefully for the next 10-15 years...

    now all they need is enough story and character to cover about 7 hours of movie for parts 7-9

    I heard that some of the clone war writers were pretty good -or maybe alan Dean Foster???

    -I'm just sayin'

    1. Re:reboot? by trout007 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Thrawn Trilogy was pretty good.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    2. Re:reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      zahn trilogy or gtfo

    3. Re:reboot? by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      I did quite enjoy that one as well.

    4. Re:reboot? by isorox · · Score: 2

      now all they need is enough story and character to cover about 7 hours of movie for parts 7-9

      Why start now?

    5. Re:reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... it was so artistically done.

    6. Re:reboot? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Hopefully this will allow for an Abrams style reboot of the franchise as has been done with Star Trek

      Not possible. The prequels already trashed the franchise. The only advantage Abrams would have is that it would be hard to make it worse.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    7. Re:reboot? by a_hanso · · Score: 1

      No no no... have you any idea what happens when you mix light sabers and lens flares?

    8. Re:reboot? by dbIII · · Score: 2

      Bring on Abrams, he'll deliver the Jedi Mind Meld.

    9. Re:reboot? by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 2

      No no no... have you any idea what happens when you mix light sabers and lens flares?

      Well, my theory is that's how Rainbow Brite came about in the 80s...or was that the result of light sabers and LSD?

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    10. Re:reboot? by click2005 · · Score: 1

      Remake it seriously? Has the story not already been told and retold with how many versions on even more formats?
      Everyone will be disappointed with some parts that failed to live up to whatever fanboy expectation they happen to have.

      Instead of pissing away an obscene amount of money on one film that has already been told to death they could make 100 smaller films employing a whole load of writers, actors and crew. Thats a hundred new films that could become the next Star Wars.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    11. Re:reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully this will allow for an Abrams style reboot

      A reboot would be nice. Get rid of those darn midichlorians and make it all spiritual again.

    12. Re:reboot? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 5, Funny

      Following a galaxy-wide financial crisis, Jar Jar Binks goes rogue, demanding the government honour his pension, holding Queen Leia and her consort Han Solo hostage on board a cargo ship. An ageing Luke Skywalker is recalled from Tattoine in pursuit of Binks, piloting a vintage last-millenium Falcon. This rust-bucket hasn't seen a mechanic in 30 years. A malfunction in the hyperdrive creates a temporal vortex. sending the ships of Binks and Skywalker back 60 years to when Obi Wan was still a young man.

      The vortex dumps them in orbit of planet Naboo, where out of the cockpit Luke glimpses his parents Padme and Anakin undergoing a secret wedding. He fires on Jar Jar's ship, which bursts into flame and crashes into the lake retreat, thus killing Jar Jar, Padme and Anakin. Han and Leia are ejected into the lake shortly before impact.

      C3PO and R2D2 are unscathed. Realising the paradox of accidentally killing his parents before conception, Luke exclaims "Nooooooooooooooooo!" immediately before he and Leia's existence is erased from history. Solo emerges from the lake alone.

      And so any recollection of episodes 1-3 are instantaneously erased from the audience's memories thus creating a parallel timeline.

    13. Re:reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd pay $15 bucks for that.

    14. Re:reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no... have you any idea what happens when you mix light sabers and lens flares?

      That made me 'lol', thanks. :-)

    15. Re:reboot? by unitron · · Score: 4, Funny

      "The only advantage Abrams would have is that it would be hard to make it worse."

      Do not underestimate the power of lens flares.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    16. Re:reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you really should get an agent and properly option this. I'm sure Hollywood would give it serious consideration.

    17. Re:reboot? by redwraith94 · · Score: 2

      Scarlett Johansson as Mara Jade...diessss happpppy...

      --
      I art more snarky, and terse than thou. I art Slashdot!
    18. Re:reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jar Jar won't be moving around very quickly with his artificial hips. Watch out for his bionic tongue's long distance slobbering though.

    19. Re:reboot? by rgbscan · · Score: 1

      ^^ This. Please dear lord this!!!!

    20. Re:reboot? by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

      Han Solo has been on the run for years from Greedo's family, who are furious that he gunned down Greedo in cold blood.

      Han weakly claims, "Greedo shot first," in one scene to try to get the relentless Greedo Family off of his trail, but nobody believes his story, as it sounds far-fetched.

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    21. Re:reboot? by rgbscan · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I couldn't watch the new Star Trek due to all the artificially inserted lens flares. And after I pointed them out to my roommate, they insisted we shut off the movie. It's like the first time someone points out blocky compression artifacts in dark colors to you on your new big screen pumping out "HD" cable. It's all you can see after that.

    22. Re:reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jj style, fuck

      thats funny,,

      so i wonder, has anyone spoke with Chewbacca yet? I wonder how wookies age.

    23. Re:reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Thrawn Trilogy was pretty good.

      For me to poop on.

    24. Re:reboot? by mitzoe · · Score: 1

      Well, you don't want to cross them. Very bad things will happen.

    25. Re:reboot? by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Exactly. I couldn't watch the new Star Trek due to all the artificially inserted lens flares. And after I pointed them out to my roommate, they insisted we shut off the movie. It's like the first time someone points out blocky compression artifacts in dark colors to you on your new big screen pumping out "HD" cable. It's all you can see after that.

      Really? It's the lens flares that made it bad for you? Not the plot? Not the gaping deviations from canon? Not the ridiculous way that the captaincy is handed around based on who's in the turbolift, rather than who has the rank/seniority? It was the lens flares? Seriously?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    26. Re:reboot? by unitron · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I couldn't watch the new Star Trek due to all the artificially inserted lens flares. And after I pointed them out to my roommate, they insisted we shut off the movie. It's like the first time someone points out blocky compression artifacts in dark colors to you on your new big screen pumping out "HD" cable. It's all you can see after that.

      Really? It's the lens flares that made it bad for you? Not the plot? Not the gaping deviations from canon? Not the ridiculous way that the captaincy is handed around based on who's in the turbolift, rather than who has the rank/seniority? It was the lens flares? Seriously?

      Just think of them as the icing on the urinal cake that was Star Trek 90210.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    27. Re:reboot? by trout007 · · Score: 1

      Are you Mark Hamill?

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    28. Re:reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it wasn't. It was awful. It was derivative, puerile, the plot was boring, it was repetitive, and it kept saying "Hey, you remember those stories where we did that heroic shit?"

      I read it twice. I want rid of my books, unfortunately I have an OCD objection to throwing them out.

    29. Re:reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not as good as you think it is. It's shit. it'd end up being like episodes 1 and 2, only worse. It'd be like it was written by a child.

    30. Re:reboot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo, we heard you like lens flares so we put lens flares on your lens flares.

  4. He was misunderstood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    What he said was that they may APPEAR in the next film, but what he means is that he's using footage from the first three movies, and digitally recreating them. The human actors will not be involved.

    1. Re:He was misunderstood by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 2

      So they'd take the footage from the original films and rearrange it to make new stories? Beats using them as is - the pictures of the actors in TFA are a bit alarming. Hamill looks like a long haul trucker who's in great pain from attempting to digest a short stack of pancakes.

      Definitely tag this "NOOOOOOOOO!" Or is it "NOOOOO!"?

    2. Re:He was misunderstood by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1
      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    3. Re:He was misunderstood by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      god-damn, I just googled up a picture of him and only stopped laughing to wipe away the tears. Face like a welder's bench.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    4. Re:He was misunderstood by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      Definitely tag this "NOOOOOOOOO!" Or is it "NOOOOO!"?

      do not want!

    5. Re:He was misunderstood by ciurana · · Score: 1

      The correct tag:

      "DO NOT WANT!!!"

      Cheers!

      --
      http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
    6. Re:He was misunderstood by Dabido · · Score: 1

      Chewbacca is replaced by a giant walkie talkie as he was deemed too violent.

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  5. Uh, oh... by mrsam · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... I have a bad feeling about this.

    1. Re:Uh, oh... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sir, the possibility of successfully creating a good new star wars movie is approximately 3,720 to 1!

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    2. Re:Uh, oh... by Abreu · · Score: 5, Funny

      Never tell me the odds!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    3. Re:Uh, oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the wookiee write the script R2.

    4. Re:Uh, oh... by makubesu · · Score: 3, Funny

      These are not the actors you're looking for.

    5. Re:Uh, oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha, so fucking funny. The mods on this site have gone to shit.

    6. Re:Uh, oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to do this to impress me!

  6. I don't think Greedo's coming back. by Chas · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think he probably ended up as part of the next daily special at the cantina...

    "Why's this chili green?"
    "Green peppers man!"
    "Oh."

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:I don't think Greedo's coming back. by meerling · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe he became a Saint. After all, he was dead and holy by that time.

  7. Ford? by fermion · · Score: 1

    While Fisher seems to have confirmed it. Can't see Hamill has anything else to do. But how much are they going to pay Ford to do the work?

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Ford? by PNutts · · Score: 1

      It had better be at least 12 parsecs because the last I read Harrison Ford for whatever reason was DONE with Star Wars and Han Solo.

    2. Re:Ford? by Miseph · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you really think they wouldn't be able to afford him? This is a new Star Wars movie being made by Disney, they can and will spend whatever amount of money they need to get whatever it is they want, and they'll still turn a profit even if it sucks.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    3. Re:Ford? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Do you really think they wouldn't be able to afford him? This is a new Star Wars movie being made by Disney, they can and will spend whatever amount of money they need to get whatever it is they want, and they'll still turn a profit even if it sucks.

      He certainly doesn't need the money like some of the others but if he's expecting a 10 million dollar payday, he must be going senile. Sean Connery can still command top dollar, but Ford? That's just not going to happen?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:Ford? by westlake · · Score: 4, Informative

      While Fisher seems to have confirmed it. Can't see Hamill has anything else to do.

      Mark Hamill has become one of the most successful and sought after vocal talents in the business.

      Film and television animation, video games, audio books and so on. The definitive voice of The Joker.

    5. Re:Ford? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Informative

      yea, sure looks like Mark has been sitting on his but for the last 25+ years

      http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000434/

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    6. Re:Ford? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      well of course, the thing ended in 1983 why would Ford wait around for 16 years.....and then it started up again with horrific sequels

    7. Re:Ford? by jbeaupre · · Score: 2, Funny

      So Han Solo didn't sign first?

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    8. Re:Ford? by Adult+film+producer · · Score: 1

      there was a short news blip about this recently on NPR and Ford said he would be willing to have a role in the new movies with the condition that his character dies. whether or not that means being in all three movies is up in the air.. I thinks its a bad idea to bring any of them back.. let jj do what he has to do to reboot the franchise without hamstringing his creativity with old characters and old ideas. if jj wants them.. cool, but don't force him, please!

    9. Re:Ford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much, this. Disney was willing to dump 4 billion dollars to buy the franchise. Somehow, I doubt a few tens of millions of dollars would perturb them from hiring one of the most notable actors from the original trilogy.

    10. Re:Ford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harrison Ford got $65 Million for the Abomination of the Crystal Skulls.

      If you don't think he can get at least a small fraction of that ($10M) for another Star Wars ...

      Let's just agree to differ.

    11. Re:Ford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If only they could have casted him in the live action batman.

    12. Re:Ford? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Do you really think they wouldn't be able to afford him? This is a new Star Wars movie being made by Disney, they can and will spend whatever amount of money they need to get whatever it is they want, and they'll still turn a profit even if it sucks.

      He certainly doesn't need the money like some of the others but if he's expecting a 10 million dollar payday, he must be going senile. Sean Connery can still command top dollar, but Ford? That's just not going to happen?

      LK

      Like the OP said, this is Disney.

      If they want to cast Chairman Mao for the part, they can afford to pay to have him dug him up, fixed up to look good, and reanimated with robotics and a vocoder.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    13. Re:Ford? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      there was a short news blip about this recently on NPR and Ford said he would be willing to have a role in the new movies with the condition that his character dies.

      I thought this already happened in the original trilogy with the corbomite business and all...?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    14. Re:Ford? by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1


      Don't worry, a little movie magic will CGI him back to youth.

      Count Dooku was doing some pretty impressive somersaults. That was a 2005 movie using technology from 2000. Imagine what 13 years of improvements can do.

      --
      A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    15. Re:Ford? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Voice work and cameos. Anything where his face was on the silver screen?

    16. Re:Ford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What have YOU done with your life? Hamill is more successful than you'll ever be.

    17. Re:Ford? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still can't get past Corvette Summer.

    18. Re:Ford? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Dude, where have you been for the last decade or so? Look up Mark Hamill on IMDB - he's had tons of projects going on for years.

      / he's the voice of the Joker, for one thing

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    19. Re:Ford? by Wolfrider · · Score: 2

      --Not sure if trolling...

      Corbomite Maneuver = Star Trek
      Carbonite = Han Solo

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    20. Re:Ford? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      If they want to cast Chairman Mao for the part, they can afford to pay to have him dug him up, fixed up to look good, and reanimated with robotics and a vocoder.

      I read that as robotics and a voodooer. So naturally I would definately watch that.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    21. Re:Ford? by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? We all know movies never make any profit.

    22. Re:Ford? by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 1

      Chairman Mao isn't actually buried. He's entombed in glass on display in Tienanmen Square. Creepy ._.

    23. Re:Ford? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      True, I was using "dig up" figuratively.

      (/me wishes now that he'd used Hugo Chávez instead, could have looked prescient and all that, ah well...)

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    24. Re:Ford? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Putting your face through a windshield at the start of an acting career before plastic surgery was a major option can really limit your screen time. He made the best of what he could.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  8. It's a trap! by mcgrew · · Score: 2

    I saw this on TV this morning... damn but Carrie Fisher looks older than me. You guys who thought the prequels ruined your childhood...

    1. Re:It's a trap! by CncRobot · · Score: 5, Interesting

      She recently did a special called "Wishful Drinking", which is about her life, where she complained that someone on the internet say she looked like Elton John. She said it wasn't so much that they said it as much as she understood what they meant.

      She is actually pretty funny and it was a pretty good show.

    2. Re:It's a trap! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I understood her frustration. As an actress, people expected her to be 23 forever. On top of that, the years of hard drinking took a toll on her body and face so she aged TERRIBLY. I was hurt, personally hurt when I saw what all those years of drinking did to what I once regarded as one of the most beautiful women ever.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    3. Re:It's a trap! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      drinking? she likes cocaine, even in the days of acting for Star Wars.

    4. Re:It's a trap! by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      live rough, look rough. c.f. lindsay lohan, alice cooper

    5. Re:It's a trap! by Abreu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Considering how Carrie Fisher and Mark Hammil look nowadays, the movies should be set 100 years after the Battle of Yavin!

      But seriously, watching them as secondary characters and possibly mentors to a new set of young heroes would be awesome.

      I'd like to see Leia as a tough-as-nails politician in Coruscant, Luke as head of a new Jedi order and Han still flying the galaxy with Chewbacca.

      (yes, I am ignoring the novels and comic canon)

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    6. Re:It's a trap! by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

      Who would so cruelly insult Elton John?

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    7. Re:It's a trap! by AK+Marc · · Score: 4, Funny

      When 900 years old you are, look as good you will not. It should be 900 years after Yavin. Because look as good, he does not.

    8. Re:It's a trap! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny

      I understood her frustration. As an actress, people expected her to be 23 forever. On top of that, the years of hard drinking took a toll on her body and face so she aged TERRIBLY. I was hurt, personally hurt when I saw what all those years of drinking did to what I once regarded as one of the most beautiful women ever.

      LK

      So we shouldn't expect any chain bikinis this time around?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    9. Re:It's a trap! by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Hopefully not!

    10. Re:It's a trap! by bickerdyke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think Alice Cooper never ever had a career based on his good looks....

      --
      bickerdyke
    11. Re:It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As rubycodez says, "drinking" isn't the primary recreational drug involved, but yeah. 'S a shame.

      But counter to stereotypes of the aging ex-starlet, she does seem to be a truly nice person, and is taking/has taken the let-down a lot better than I would ever have.

    12. Re:It's a trap! by SternisheFan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As rubycodez says, "drinking" isn't the primary recreational drug involved, but yeah. 'S a shame.

      But counter to stereotypes of the aging ex-starlet, she does seem to be a truly nice person, and is taking/has taken the let-down a lot better than I would ever have.

      And she has survived her drinking/drug days, and has grown into a better person, that's more than you can say about a lot of celebrities. I give her props just for that. Not a quitter, Princess Leia is.

      - - -

      "Do or do not, there is no try." - Yoda

    13. Re:It's a trap! by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you but Chewy died shortly after Return of the Jedi - there are 3 wookie years to one human year you see..

      Sorry for your loss...

    14. Re:It's a trap! by Geeky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He does, just in a different way.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    15. Re:It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The audience is always cruel and insufferably ignorant. Most don't realize that there really are no terrible actors... every actor that has ever worked professionally actually does have the skill and drive to work their craft as good as any other professional. As an actor gains experience, their skill increases. Fame is no indication of talent. That said, when Fisher took a supporting role in When Harry Met Sally, I noted that she was all Pro— even if she wasn't the star, she carried the scenes she was in as much as the part would allow.

    16. Re:It's a trap! by Evtim · · Score: 1

      And neither you or the once above mentioned that Carry is manic depressive. She was one of the stars in Stephen Fry's documentary aboout manic depressives. Perhaps the drugs and the drinks are consequience? She is at the moment on tons of medication and barely behaves normally. I am so sorry that he life turned that way...

    17. Re:It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I just threw up a little bit in my mouth after reading that. :x

    18. Re:It's a trap! by SternisheFan · · Score: 1
      I wasn't aware of Ms. Fisher's manic-depressive disorder. That could explain why she fell into drugs, as a lot of drug/alcohol abusers are really attempting to "self-medicate", or so it's believed today. Though sometimes the treatment of mothem with modern meds is a lot of guesswork by doctors. Bad reaction to the prescribed drugs? The dose is altered up or down, changed to a different medication, or add another drug and see how the patient reacts in a few weeks.

      We are still in the learning stages of diseases of the brain (compund word from the greek: Dis - ease. 'Dis' meaning "not", so the term "disease" means "not at ease"). We've come a long way in our understanding of how the brain works in the last 30 years or so. Still, a large number of misdiagnosing goes on today, resulting in patient suffering needlessly because of improper medication.

    19. Re:It's a trap! by spoilsportmotors · · Score: 1

      See: LICD for further explanation.

    20. Re:It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolute crap.

      See the wookiepedia for clarification, but Chewie was there with Yoda at the end of the clone wars. Wookies live far longer than humans.

      Wait... I'm arguing about FICTIONAL characters! *sigh* I knew it would happen eventually...

      -Jar.
      (Posted as A/C coz I've modded a few posts on this thread.)

    21. Re:It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now there's a bikini I haven't fit into in a long, long time

    22. Re:It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a quitter, Princess Leia is.

      Yoda FAIL! He would say it more like:

      A quitter, Princess Leia is not.

    23. Re:It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On top of that, the years of hard drinking took a toll on her body and face so she aged TERRIBLY.

      Drinking? Hahahaha the booze was the least of her problems. Cocaine is a Helluva Drug, and all those pills didn't help either. But most of what aged her face was the sudden explosion of Fat she got when she finally got off the drugs and replaced them with food... she finally got rid of most of that but your skin can only take so much abuse of that sort.

      what I once regarded as one of the most beautiful women ever.

      Eh, she was cute enough and made for a decent teenage masturbatory fantasy, but she was never that hot.

      Watch some of her more recent interviews where she talks about her life. She's got a great sense of humor and is a pretty sharp tack. It wouldn't hurt my feelings at all to see her back for another movie... but then again I'm interested in her abilities as an actress and not just hoping for some jerk-off material like you are.

    24. Re:It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you but Chewy died shortly after Return of the Jedi - there are 3 wookie years to one human year you see..

      Sorry for your loss...

      Lucas never hesitated to completely throw his established mechanics out the window and re-write "history" in order to shoehorn in something he thinks will get a few more eyes on the cinema screen. If he thinks people want Chewy, we'll suddenly find out that Wookies live ten times longer than a normal human, or age backwards, or some half-assed explanation that completely invalidates the established "canon" of the SW universe.

      Shit, regardless of whether or not you think Han Shot First, and despite anything Lucas intended to happen, the story with Han shooting First was the better tale. But that didn't stop Lucas from jacking around with the footage just to show everyone that He Was Boss.

    25. Re:It's a trap! by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      (looks up a recent picture) ...wow. I err...yeah. That's sad. How did...man, I should stop drinking...

    26. Re:It's a trap! by dragon-file · · Score: 1

      But they can't ignore canon! It would make the movies really hard to watch for those who have taken the time to read the books.

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    27. Re:It's a trap! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      What's worse, I know women younger than her that look like they could be my mother. They're all alcoholics and former cocaine addicts. Oddly, I'm sure I drink too much but most folks peg me at at least ten years younger than I am. Must be all the reefer I smoke that keeps me young (that, and my DNA).

      You can thank reefer for Nobots.

    28. Re:It's a trap! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Heh, the book I'm writing now is even worse (so far). It contradicts itself! (see my journal)

    29. Re:It's a trap! by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      As an actress, people expected her to be 23 forever.

      Well, the trouble isn't that she doesn't look 23, the trouble is she looks fifteen years older than I do, and I'm 4 years older than her. Coke and booze will do that to a person.

    30. Re:It's a trap! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      And neither you or the once above mentioned that Carry is manic depressive.

      That term is outdated, it's now called "bipolar disorder" and does lead to substance abuse, as many mental illnesses do.

    31. Re:It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right, his whole career is based on his bad looks.

    32. Re:It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see Leia as a tough-as-nails politician in Coruscant...

      She could be called Nanci-Wan Pelosi.

    33. Re:It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe she was struck by force-lightning?

    34. Re:It's a trap! by GloomE · · Score: 1

      Let's just hope that this time there IS underwear in space.

    35. Re:It's a trap! by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      You don't really get how movie magic works, Chewy will be back, either as a reanimated Chewy, a clone of Chewy, or one of Chewy's offspring who looks and acts exactly the same and even has the same name.

    36. Re:It's a trap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A loony by any other name is still as mad.

  9. Given the condition of the former stars.... by Grayhand · · Score: 0

    The next three installments will be sponsored by Slim Fast after negoiations with Jenny Craig fell through.

  10. But by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did Han sign first?

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
    1. Re:But by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In the book, everyone else in the cantina starts backing away because they knew how foolish it was to let Han get his hands under the table.

      Everyone else in the story knew that Han was going to shoot Greedo except Greedo. That made his death hilarious. He went after a guy with a bounty without even doing his homework.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course he did, do you see Harrison Ford getting work another way?

    3. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Han sign first?

      Amazing!

  11. George Lucas says: by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    "I don't own Star Wars any more what are you bothering me for?"

  12. Publicity stunt by jgotts · · Score: 1

    There is no such thing as bad publicity. It's a fake leak.

  13. Why so serious? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Try different characters: Ford as Bob Falfa, Fisher as Jake's ex-fiancée, and Hamill as the Joker

    1. Re:Why so serious? by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see Hamill as the Joker. He's great as the voice.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    2. Re:Why so serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why do they call you cockknocker?

      Actually, its a funny story....

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_7HVcYjM3Y

    3. Re:Why so serious? by archer,+the · · Score: 1

      If only I had mod points... laughed my butt off when I saw that in the theaters. (No, not literally!)

  14. At Least He's Generous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I learned recently that George used the money from the sale to Disney for charitable donations (mostly education), saying that he had enough money already. I think that is rather impressive.

    1. Re:At Least He's Generous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, always impressive to give your money to the charity that you're the director of and in complete control of.

  15. Casting... by meta-monkey · · Score: 0

    So, is Fisher playing a Hutt..?

    Oooooooooooo........

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    1. Re:Casting... by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Well she already did the nasty with Jabba in return of the jedi!

      She could play Leia's half-Hutt daughter...

    2. Re:Casting... by jamiesan · · Score: 1

      The Force of gravity is with her.

  16. Make Good Use of Them by Mandrel · · Score: 1

    I hope the old characters are integral to the plot and don't just appear in a token torch-passing at the start. I'm hoping more like Obi-Wan in the original movie.

    1. Re:Make Good Use of Them by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I hope the old characters are integral to the plot and don't just appear in a token torch-passing at the start. I'm hoping more like Obi-Wan in the original movie.

      With a little trick photography to deal with the height problem, all three of them will get to take turns playing Yoda.

    2. Re:Make Good Use of Them by Rary · · Score: 1

      Rumour has it that Ford's deal is a fairly significant part. I'm not sure that he'd be interested in just a cameo, to be honest. He doesn't owe Lucas squat, and has done so much since then that he barely remembers those movies, so if he's on board, it's because it's worth it for him to be on board. Sure, his role won't be as significant as in Crystal Skull, obviously, but he'll get a few action scenes and lots of dialogue, I'm sure.

      I just hope he's still flying the Falcon. It's not a Star Wars movie without the Falcon breaking down (again).

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    3. Re:Make Good Use of Them by F1re · · Score: 1

      The Falcon only breaks down in one movie.

      --
      ...there is no sig...
  17. Sigh... by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

    Please, oh, please let them be in some cameo, secondary or supportive-only roles. The last thing Episode VII needs to be is Return of the Geriatrics.

    1. Re:Sigh... by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

      It worked for the old Star Trek movies :P They were looking positively ancient by the time VI came around.

  18. Who? by Kozz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, who the fuck is "Lea"?

    I know it's too much to ask the Slashdot editors to check their work, but how did THAT misspelling make it past how many geeks' eyeballs?

    --
    I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    1. Re:Who? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      funny you'd think there would be a correct spelling in roman letters, for the english tongue, of a name from millions of years ago in a galaxy millions of light-years away. We could mispell it in Aurebesh....

    2. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're talking about Lea Thompson. It's the new "Caroline in the City" trilogy of Star Wars.

    3. Re:Who? by The+Evil+Atheist · · Score: 1

      My experience is that many geeks are poor spellers, regardless of how ingrained certain words are in geek culture.

      --
      Those who do not learn from commit history are doomed to regress it.
    4. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The spelling of Leia is Cannon, and has been known for 35+ years.

    5. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean canon?

      Or um, you actually spell "Leia" as "Cannon"?

      That seems confusing.

    6. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My experience is that misspelling Leia is sacrilegious and requires the perpetrator to bring those nachos his mom makes the next time we get together and play Magic: The Gathering, Bob. So you think he'd learn. But hey, free nachos.

    7. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd Leia.

    8. Re:Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      But you'll end up doing it with your Hans Solo ...

    9. Re:Who? by unitron · · Score: 1

      They're talking about Lea Thompson...

      Well, she does have experience in George Lucas films already.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    10. Re:Who? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      she had a nice pair of cannons back in the day

    11. Re:Who? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      you're confused, that was just the Romanized spelling of Galactic Basic name in the credits.

              Corran: "Do any of you speak Basic?"
              Zun-qin: "I speak your infidel tongue. It tastes like the waste excretions of an ill vhlor on my tongue, but I can speak it. Please, ask me something so I may deny it to you."

    12. Re:Who? by hawk · · Score: 1

      Alice's sister, perhaps? :)

      hawk

  19. Let the Cockney flow through you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and your journey towards the Brit Side will be complete!

    Seriously, thanks for the IMDB link - I would have never known that Hamill and McDiarmid got along on set because they both liked British Comedies otherwise.

    I'm now picturing a weird seen where the Emperor is cackling over an episode of Are You Being Served?

  20. LUCAS was negotiating their deals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is Lucas part of this? Dear god, Jar Jar will show up for sure.

    Damn you Disney, you had ONE chance to get rid of him!

    1. Re:LUCAS was negotiating their deals? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I think he's now a sort of Roddenberry for the Star Wars franchise. They'll use him as a consultant.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:LUCAS was negotiating their deals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meesa think thisa scene needsa more Gungans.

    3. Re:LUCAS was negotiating their deals? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Is Lucas part of this? Dear god, Jar Jar will show up for sure.

      Actually he's the director this time.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:LUCAS was negotiating their deals? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Who, Jar Jar?

      Can only be better than Lucas.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. WIlliam Shatner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now that JJ Abrams is directing both Star Wars and Star Trek, can we get William Shatner to play a villain in the new Star Wars movie just for the entertainment value of the fan bases exploding at each other?

    1. Re:WIlliam Shatner by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 1

      How about having the Shatmaster play a good guy? "NOOO...OOOO...OOOO...!!!!!"

    2. Re:WIlliam Shatner by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      Either way, it would have to become a 4 movie set. Shat will take .... So .... Long .... To .... Say .... His .... Lines ..................... That .... The .... Picture .... Will .... Be .... Motionless ..............

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
    3. Re:WIlliam Shatner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JJ is going to kill two birds with one stone. Star Wars Ep. 7 and Star Trek 3 will be that same movie. Crossover, baby!

    4. Re:WIlliam Shatner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My vote is to bring Jar Jar Binks back but have him played by Wil Wheaton. MUAHAHAHAHAHA!

    5. Re:WIlliam Shatner by kat_skan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ooh now there's a thought. We could finally settle that Enterprise vs. Star Destroyer argument. Vader could become the Borg queen. Find a way to shoehorn Picard in as well so he can have a pod racing scene. All the people in this thread saying Abrams couldn't do any worse than Lucas already has are gonna feel pretty silly.

    6. Re:WIlliam Shatner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now that JJ Abrams is directing both Star Wars and Star Trek, can we get William Shatner to play a villain in the new Star Wars movie just for the entertainment value of the fan bases exploding at each other?

      That would be pure Awesome.
      Bonus points if they get Elijah Wood and Daniel Radcliff on board.

    7. Re:WIlliam Shatner by Dusty101 · · Score: 1

      Now that JJ Abrams is directing both Star Wars and Star Trek, can we get William Shatner to play a villain in the new Star Wars movie just for the entertainment value of the fan bases exploding at each other?

      Star Wars Episode 7: Sith My Dad Says

    8. Re:WIlliam Shatner by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could have him do the Jedi Mind Meld.

  22. JJ Abrams is a hack by globaljustin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Curse your filthy mouth for saying this:

    "Hopefully this will allow for an Abrams style reboot..."

    JJ Abrams is all hype and money. His concepts are all a tease with no substance. Substance comes of course, but in his projects what we usually call 'plot', 'writing', etc are slapdash afterthoughts. He benefits from the fact that ~60% of the population will watch whatever is playing in theaters that week due to artificial scarcity of film choices.

    I'm not even a Star Wars fanboi...if anything I'll claim to be a Trekkie. If you have any notion of Star Trek as a franchise and why fans like it, the 10 Minute Star Trek 2 trailer that played before The Hobbit should be all you need to see: http://www.ign.com/videos/2012/12/19/star-trek-into-darkness-first-trailer-rewind-theater

    JJ Abrams is shit. That doesn't mean his projects are doomed. In the big-budget studio world, franchises like this become so monolithic it usually prevents stupid shit like Abrams' ridiculous lens flare fetish. Put any random 30-something film buff in his chair and let him bark orders and bullshit concepts for action scenes and you'd get the same result.

    IMHO, Abrams' shit tendencies will *not* ruin Star Wars like they ruined Star Trek. Too many people with money on this understand how shitty Abrams is...

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:JJ Abrams is a hack by TheSeatOfMyPants · · Score: 1

      IMHO, Abrams' shit tendencies will *not* ruin Star Wars like they ruined Star Trek.

      Of course not, the people responsible for Jar Jar Binks/Episode 1 did.

      --
      Now mostly at Usenet:comp.misc & SoylentNews.org (it's made of people!)
    2. Re:JJ Abrams is a hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerd RAGE!!!!!!!!!!11

      Seriously, its a movie. Nobody kicked your dog.

    3. Re:JJ Abrams is a hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And on top of all that, let's pray that John Williams writes the score instead of Abrams' buddy Michael Giacchino. Giacchino simply doesn't have the chops to pull off that kind of work, and IMO he's a talentless hack compared to Williams.

    4. Re:JJ Abrams is a hack by globaljustin · · Score: 0

      "the people responsible for Jar Jar Binks/Episode 1 did."

      Right, so that'd be George Lucas. A decision made by fiat in his role as independent filmaker emperor. That's all gone now -> Disney.

      The new Star Wars trilogy will *not* have a "Jar-Jar"

      According to my theory, now that big industry studios are projecting 50-year profit margins on rights, a "Jar-Jar" has too much 'bad press' to make it past marketing.

      Yes, big industry studios make "Jar-Jar's" but it's a different process, one that is market-tested, social media'd, and focus-grouped to death. Something so blatant as "another Jar-Jar" would raise red flags for a studio **now** given all the reviews/blog posts/word of mouth on how much Jar-Jar was hated by fans.

      Also, JJ Abrams is a hack (obv) but he's more 'hip' because the women he bangs are younger (my guess). He'd veto a "Jar-Jar" even though overall he's shit.

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    5. Re:JJ Abrams is a hack by globaljustin · · Score: 1

      I love that I elicited such an emotional response from you using complex ideas and with sources cited.

      What your comment tells me is, from a 2nd order Cybernetics perspective, my excoriation of JJ Abrams had the punch of a flamebait text art comment but the complexity and intellectual gravitas of an essay.

      Thanks ;)

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    6. Re:JJ Abrams is a hack by dywolf · · Score: 1

      i take heart from the fact that while Abrams and Bay are popular to bash around here, they make tons and tons of money, which can be logically extended to mean these voices are in the minority, because lots and lots of people still go see the movies. so whine all you want of JJ "Lens Flare" Abrams and Michael "Explosions" Bay ruining your childhood memories. They aint all that bad, and if you truly remember the originals....they weren't all that good either, compared to our memories of them.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    7. Re:JJ Abrams is a hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he is a perfect fit for star wars then. The plot in most SW movies is razor thin. They were usually always about the special effects. In 1976 SW blew away anything around it. The first SW movies the people looked like they were on another planet and not on some set. They looked like they were in a lived in universe where things broke and were dirty. We take for granted now what ILM did (as they do it for everyone now, for a fee). Lucas basically created the special effects blockbuster movie that is with us to this day.

      The story on the other hand was about a whiny farm boy who makes his way into a rebel faction who are so desperate they hand him a top end snub fighter. Of course being the 'heros quest' story he saves the day. Roll credits.

      Empire, and Episode 3 were the only 2 that had a somewhat interesting plot. The rest were about how many space ships can we put on the screen. Or people, or asteroids, or lightsabers...

    8. Re:JJ Abrams is a hack by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      John Williams? You mean Gustav Holst & John Barry?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  23. This has possibilities by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

    Star Trek, Episode 7 - Depends of the Sith

    1. Re:This has possibilities by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      That better as "Depends on Sith" work would, think I.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    2. Re:This has possibilities by DKlineburg · · Score: 1

      Wait, are they throwing used depends at each other? What happened to lightsabors?

      --
      Memory is deceptive because it is colored by today's events. - Albert Einstein
  24. It's like having... by MindPrison · · Score: 0

    ...Michael J Fox back in the Future with BTTF-4 , Every diehard fan wanted it, me too in the last 5 years after the third movie. Now he's an old man, heavily into political satire and parkinsons.

    My point is, as much as I'd LOVE to see another Star-Wars with the original cast, I can't imagine Carrie Fisher and Mark Hamill as they were back in the days in a new Star-Wars movie. The biggest problems with returning actors and sequels is usually the actors own ego, they always want to appear 10-20 years younger than they really are, and it always flops big-time, the only one believing that this actually works out...is themselves in their dreams.

    Now...the BIGGEST hope, if you REALLY want the original cast in ANY movie, will be 3D models and animation, we've got the gear, we've got the motion capture stuff needed, now all we need - is the biggest badass renderfarm in history...and it just might work.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:It's like having... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      industrial light and magic...your our only hope

    2. Re:It's like having... by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Michael J. Fox actually looks pretty good. Better than he looked at "47" in BTTF2. Christopher Lloyd said he'd do the Doc Brown part again if asked too.

    3. Re:It's like having... by MindPrison · · Score: 1

      I agree, he does, but he still struggles with Parkinsons even though he has gotten better.

      But yeah, I'd love another BTTF, they're truly legendary, and I must have seen them 100's of times by now :)

      --
      What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  25. cryo sleep by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    They are found tumbling in space in lead line fridge.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  26. in an ominous voice of command... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "these are not the old farts that you are looking for"

    1. Re:in an ominous voice of command... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      +1, Best Post

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  27. Geriatric Wars? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    What gives? They want to recycle the old quote "When nine hundred years old you reach, look as good, you will not" and put it in the mouth of Solo? For crying out loud, Ford is 70 years old! Hamill is 60 and Fisher 55, in most countries they qualify for retirement. And they should play action heroes?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Geriatric Wars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes Obiwan. It will be truly awful.

    2. Re:Geriatric Wars? by Pranadevil2k · · Score: 1

      If they went with any of the later stories from the expanded universe books, Han Solo ends up as a retired New Republic Admiral, Leia is still a diplomat (and mother of 3 with Han), and Luke becomes a mentor for a new Jedi Academy. In those roles, they don't have to be a significant part of the action in order to be integral to the plot.

  28. I find your lack of faith by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

    Disturbing, of course. Have an equally compelling story/lesson. A mother's fear when she loses her child. A warrior's trepidation when he murders his first opponent.

    --
    Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
  29. I say the audience won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The silly stupidity of the prequel Episodes has sunk star wars completely.

  30. Original trilogy by Trogre · · Score: 1

    For anyone still interested in Star Wars, Adywan's ESB:Revisited is due out in a couple of months. A preview with comparison to the crappy Blu Ray is here (switch on HD).

    One rather impressive changelog so far.

    These aren't original preservation attempts, rather new Special Editions or, more accurately, what the Special Editions should have been.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  31. ILM by kiriath · · Score: 2

    Has its work cut out for it if Fisher is going to be in it...

    "Guys we need a filter to make some look like not a fat coke head"

    "We better double the budget"

  32. This time we get.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Jabba the Slut?

  33. Animation / Voice Actors by cstacy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The last Star Wars movie was entirely a CGI animated feature-length cartoon. Is there some reason to believe that the sequel movies will be live action, and not CGI? Obviously, if it's animation then the appearance of the original actors is not a factor; they will be voice actors. This is Disney we're talking about, after all.

    1. Re:Animation / Voice Actors by kiriath · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I just died a little inside...

    2. Re:Animation / Voice Actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, so just like the last what, half-dozen Marvel movies then?

    3. Re:Animation / Voice Actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Clone Wars "film" wasn't really a movie, as much as a pilot episode for the TV series that some executives somewhere decided could make more money if they released it theatrically.

      The sequels are going to be full-scale films, and I think we are meant to assume they will be live action (although... in theory the prequels were live action, despite huge chunks being CG).

  34. Will not have Jar-Jar? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    So Abrams is not directing anymore?

    He wasn't by any chance killed along with Lilliput and Orcish when a burning piano dropped on their heads?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  35. So he looks older. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the musings of some of you, I had the impression he would be looking like a humanoid Jabba.

    I think their features would be suitable for a series set AFTER the Jedi Twins had kids and their characters are grandparents. Especially since, to keep some tension plot going, they've been in universe-destroying war almost constantly for 40 years.

    The downer would be trying to keep them as the same action figures they were in the Original Trilogy. They should be working more like The OT Yoda. They can't beat people up like they used to, but they learned how to use what they can still do to win. They've learned and grown. To be honest, I think that's one reason I didn't watch the last Indiana Jones movie: it was an old man pretending he was the same action actor he was a generation ago. Look at Sean Connery's role in the third movie: he wasn't an action figure, but he still was competent.

  36. my only hope by Paolone · · Score: 1

    I hope that Lucas keeps the heck away from the new movies.

  37. Stan our friend was raped, and we just stood there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYlLY5UJfKI

  38. oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of fans suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced. I fear something terrible has happened.

  39. What about the best character? by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

    No Billie Dee Williams? But he's got no work all the time.

    --
    Sig. Sig. Sputnik
  40. Headline grabbing! by r33per · · Score: 1

    It's a trap!

  41. I thought he was done?! by chemdream78 · · Score: 1

    Why is George even talking about this? It scares me that he's involved at all...

    1. Re:I thought he was done?! by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      George Lucas is indeed a walking advertisiment for lowering the amount of time before copyrights expire.

      Help me Public Domain. You're my only hope!

  42. R2D2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares if these old actors return, R2D2 is all I want to see (and hear) back! Give him some shiny new Li-ion batteries and he should be bleeping with delight!

  43. I'd look forward to more Star Wars... by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    ...if only they could try to not break the extended universe. If they would maintain the extended universe then, aside from being respectful to fans and authors (who have painstakingly ensured continuity), some of those stories would make good movies.

    But, alas, no. And that irritates me.

  44. Too much time has gone by by mark-t · · Score: 1

    I like the actors, and while I do think it's a great continuity nod to get them involved, I can't help but feel like the fact that they are so much older than how they appeared in 1983 is going to introduce a disconnect where people who knew the characters are not going to be able to connect with those characters in any kind of meaningful way, because there haven't been any movies with those characters for 30 years. It feels like a continuity nod for its own sake rather than for the sake of making it a better story, because so much time has gone by that I see no real way that people are likely to feel like these are the characters that they were once familiar with.

    I mean, maybe it'd be easier for people who were already well into their adulthood when those movies came out, but I know from personal experience that just meeting up with a friend you had as a teenager and you haven't seen in 20 years feels strange, because you feel like you should be able to reform a connection to that person, but the sheer quantity of time that has gone by without any contact has created such a large disconnect that simply seeing them again after so long has no real hope of re-establishing any sort of feeling of familiarity.

    Seriously, I think that if they are using the original actors like this to involve those characters, they would be better off doing it it as an animated feature... perhaps with realistic computer graphics, than hoping that viewers will ever somehow have any sort of connection to these characters.

  45. You Know You Want It... by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

    Star Wars vs. Star Trek

    JJ will make it so.

  46. Remember Tron: Legacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has everyone forgotten Tron: Legacy already, specifically the 'rejuvenating trick' Disney pulled on Jeff Bridges? They already have the technology, they can make these characters look any age they want.

  47. Dancing with the stars by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Forget the movie, put them all on Dancing with the Stars (Wars). R2 would win.

  48. "artificial scarcity of movie choices" by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    you missed/ignored/didn't read that part of my post did you?

    go ahead and re-read my **entire** post, think about it, and come back....**waits a few minutes**

    just because something 'makes money' doesn't mean it isn't total and complete shit...you have to look at WHY...you do realize people do something called 'game the system' right?

    ex: a shitty restaurant can last for decades in the right location, but a restaurant could have the *best* concept ever and give the best service, cheapest prices, etc. and not succeed.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  49. Sequel by LienRag · · Score: 1

    What would be a VERY interesting seventh SW movie is one exploring the power wacuum created after the death of Emperor Palpatine, with high-level ex-Empire generals trying to seize power for themselves (remember, there's no more Senate) and the Rebel Alliance exploding from political rivalries now that the spoils of wars are to be shared.
    With the Jedi Knights eradicated and reduced to a very young man with a short training, there is no more centralized force bearing any legitimity to use coercition to keep things together...
    While Luke would certainly take rebuilding the Jedi Order as his main duty, there would be much disagreement over who should "help" him to do that and to how to do it.