Slashdot Mirror


User: rubycodez

rubycodez's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10,921
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10,921

  1. Re:Interesting, but.. on Watch Out Linux, GNU Hurd Coming · · Score: 1

    HURD is nowhere near anything that could be used in a production system, it is not stable and has very poor performance. just a toy for those that like to play with kernel ideas. that's not bad, but saying "watch out Linux or Watch out BSD" is just silly. HURD would need another five years of work if enough mind share could be gathered.

  2. Re:Awesome. on Scientists Breeding Super Bees · · Score: 1

    no one died, but it was the raw agility that promoted me to queen

  3. Re:Which original rights cost others? on The Cost Of Broadband In Every Rural Home · · Score: 1

    You are full of hot air, and prattle and blather on while utterly ignoring the truth that a jury trial costs the jurors and is a right that comes at their expense. Volumes of wrong words do not contradict the truth.

  4. Re:What about the Chinese? on James Webb Space Telescope Closer To the Axe · · Score: 1

    the Chinese have their own space program with various observatories on earth and launched, with more planned

  5. Re:Anecdotes from rural Oregon on The Cost Of Broadband In Every Rural Home · · Score: 1

    what kind of geek are you? go realign their damn dish for them, you lazy git.

  6. Re:Which original rights cost others? on The Cost Of Broadband In Every Rural Home · · Score: 1

    trial by jury

  7. Re:Awesome. on Scientists Breeding Super Bees · · Score: 1

    mind your drone beeswax

  8. Re:Awesome. on Scientists Breeding Super Bees · · Score: 1

    that's a-pollen to hear

  9. Re:Stung? Sue Monsanto .... on Scientists Breeding Super Bees · · Score: 2

    That's not how the New World Order works, citizen 1327877: get stung by engineered bee and Monsanto sues your ass for having their patented bee DNA stuck in your skin

  10. Re:Awesome. on Scientists Breeding Super Bees · · Score: 1

    Comb on, let's swarm up our pun generators

  11. Re:software does not suffer physical decay on Microsoft Pulling the Plug On Windows XP In Three Years · · Score: 1

    in the pc world it can, y2k issues plague a lot of wares from 1980s and early 90s, some unique to older BIOS. Old wares were often tied to specific devices and specific disk layouts. A couple years ago for my employer I had to scavenge a 80486 with huge card cage together to run apps, proprietary POTS cards and a dongle under OS/2, hit all those issues and more, what fun and what a rush when it was finally running just like it was 1990.

  12. Re:Not a moment too soon! on Microsoft Pulling the Plug On Windows XP In Three Years · · Score: 1

    naw, you are thinking of support for the old 6.2 and 7.3-2 on Alpha only, which HP say supported at least through end of 2012 (may go longer)

    The current version 8.4 for both alpha and integrity just came out middle of last year, and though no end dates even announced yet, typical is 5 years support plus 5 more extended engineering support available.

    http://h71000.www7.hp.com/openvms/pdf/openvms_roadmaps.pdf

    (among other things, my employer requires me to be an Hp certified Integrity Application Integration Specialist (AIS), so we can sell the damn things)

  13. Re:This is not news on Microsoft Pulling the Plug On Windows XP In Three Years · · Score: 1

    My employer, a VAR, is still selling win 7 systems with Xp downgrade, to government (city, state, county) accounts. And they will do so for years, by contract.

  14. Re:Not a moment too soon! on Microsoft Pulling the Plug On Windows XP In Three Years · · Score: 1

    2.4 had a nice long run though, I just looked at the change logs starting with 2.4.1 in Jan 31, 2001 until the last one in Dec 18 2010, 2.4.37.11

  15. Re:Not a moment too soon! on Microsoft Pulling the Plug On Windows XP In Three Years · · Score: 1

    those are actually short time intervals compared to the big iron, where you can run 30-40 year old OS and its apps under the current descendant system. Like 1974 MVS and its apps can run under Z/OS today. or run a late 60s DOS and apps under your Z/VSE. Or run your Burroughs MCP stuff from 1969 on a ClearPath mainframe today. You don't tell fortune 1000 companies or the banking system they have to throw away a twenty year old mission critical app, they'll bitch slap your face onto the nearest wall.

  16. Re:Not a moment too soon! on Microsoft Pulling the Plug On Windows XP In Three Years · · Score: 1

    sounds nice in theory, but new machines won't have the ports and accept the IO cards old ones will. Some wares can't function with a clock rate that is too fast, or they require old type of hard drive.

  17. Re:Not a moment too soon! on Microsoft Pulling the Plug On Windows XP In Three Years · · Score: 1

    Hohoho. Your 1980s PC software will generally puke with Y2K issues now.

  18. Re:Nor does Canonical charge for upgrades on Microsoft Pulling the Plug On Windows XP In Three Years · · Score: 1

    Xubuntu 11.04 is ok, it's Ubuntu without the Unity suck. That should hold you for now while you plan your Ubuntu Great Escape. For me that's the extra hard drive I'm building up with a Debian xfce 6.01

  19. Re:Good Riddens on Congress Voting To Repeal Incandescent Bulb Ban · · Score: 1

    because lawmakers can write down any meaningless standard they want, without regard to reality. because lawmakers obey those they fill their pockets (mega-corporate interests)

    "Whim" is what constitutes the bulk of our economy and power usage. You don't *need* lighting, air conditioning, home computer, books, comfortable bed, etc. in the absolute sense. We're talking about the bulk of money being spent to make life "nice", including most consumer energy consumption (and at least a third of industrial). Don't need some goody-goody enamored with symbolism over substance to come along and tell me I *must* spend money for a light source that 25% of the time fails before it can pay for itself (perhaps negating any energy savings), has horrid colors, contains poisonous heavy metal, etc.

    Let me buy what I *want*, and when the price of a good light source is *cheap*, and saves me money, I'll buy it all by myself without a bunch of corrupt evil ignorant dolts in the pocket of mega-corporations (our lawmakers) telling me what to do.

  20. Re:Classic! on Congress Voting To Repeal Incandescent Bulb Ban · · Score: 1

    nope, you missed the point of the thermodynamics class, heat engines have efficiency determined by temperature differences. Air to air heat pump a waste of money below 30 degrees F (-1 C)

  21. Re:Classic! on Congress Voting To Repeal Incandescent Bulb Ban · · Score: 1

    sorry, efficiency plummets as temperature drops, you'll *waste* money using those at below 30 degrees F (-1 degrees C)

  22. Re:CFL are no savings on Congress Voting To Repeal Incandescent Bulb Ban · · Score: 1

    and they (EPA) have a web site for such things, you know

    (monty python mumble to camera, "lazy git.....") 8D

  23. Re:CFL are no savings on Congress Voting To Repeal Incandescent Bulb Ban · · Score: 1

    that's a lot of hot air. we're simply talking about what would contaminate a lot of water beyond limit set by EPA. Break a CFL in a tank of water and drink it all, let us know how that works out for you.

  24. Re:CFL are no savings on Congress Voting To Repeal Incandescent Bulb Ban · · Score: 1

    Elemental, EPA limit is 0.002 milligrams per liter

  25. Re:Why not? on Windows 8 Will Run On All Current PC Hardware · · Score: 1

    the high end expensive CPUs are still increasing in power per core, Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition 990x is 27,000 Dhrystone MIPS per core.