Kerry lost the election. Get over it. Have a cookie.
Maybe if you actually got involved and tried to get more of your little hippie friends to vote it might have turned out differently.
Or maybe if the two main political parties put forward canidates other than Mr Stupid and Mr Ignorant (or even the almost canidate Mr Nutjob)we might live in a better country.
I only view this site from a fully concecrated Fedora Core box using the holy Firefox webbrowser.
[/sarcasm]
Actually, old boy, I got the first bit from the Gospel of Tux, one of the better Linux jokes/humor out there. The Mammon reference is obvious to anyone who knows the famous about:mozilla easteregg. And this is the first time I have posted it.
Have a good day, remember to stay off the cough syrup.
Because we all know how much everyone pays attention to politics.
Now you want people who stay at home all the time surfing the net and watching daytime TV to make all the decisions.
Listen to your average talk radio caller (from BOTH sides), that would be the person sitting 24/7 infront of there computer pressing the [VOTE] button for every mundane issue that came through.
If you don't belive me, take a look at some of the fscking idiotic, or even cruel, decisions the ancient Athenian assembly (whose members were decided by lot) made.
If all the effort everyone is putting into Kyoto was instead directed into deploying current Feul Cell technology a good portion of the problem would go away.
Instead we have whiney Euro politicians who want to appease their Green parties and stick it to the Americans, while avoiding fulfiling their obligations as much as humanly possible.
International Treaties aren't worth the paper they are written on.
I've always had the same hesitating suggestion: branch the wikipedia so that there's something like a "stable branch".
Of course, such a thing would be a logistical nightmare, and it's damn near impossible. However, I think it would be appreciated by a lot of people if some editorial process could be worked in somehow.
This is actually a very good idea.
A stub could start out as a beta, where it gets many edits. After a certain ammount of time/edits the entry could be forked into a RC and dev page. The RC could be locked and the dev maintained on a seperate tab (like the discussion or talk links are now). You could then put up a voting system where you can give a thumbs up or down.
If it gets a number of yes votes it could then be called a stable page (1.0) More edits would still be made on the dev page until it reaches the limit where it goes up for a up/down vote again, and a snapshot of the dev would go up for review. If it passes you could then have a 1.1 version of the page and continue adnausium.
This would provide a signifigant ammount of quality control on the page.
Slashdot Mirror
If someone with ill itent has access to desks and workstations, guessing passwords is the least of your concerns.
There is a difference between knowing PHP and knowing php.
Not everyone wears a tinfoil hat like you?
Kerry lost the election. Get over it. Have a cookie.
Maybe if you actually got involved and tried to get more of your little hippie friends to vote it might have turned out differently.
Or maybe if the two main political parties put forward canidates other than Mr Stupid and Mr Ignorant (or even the almost canidate Mr Nutjob)we might live in a better country.
Blasphemer! Burn him at the stake!
I only view this site from a fully concecrated Fedora Core box using the holy Firefox webbrowser.
[/sarcasm]
Actually, old boy, I got the first bit from the Gospel of Tux, one of the better Linux jokes/humor out there. The Mammon reference is obvious to anyone who knows the famous about:mozilla easteregg. And this is the first time I have posted it.
Have a good day, remember to stay off the cough syrup.
They are aiding Microsoft, the Great Darkness which is called Abomination, Destroyer of the Earth, the Gates of Hell.
Collaboration with the followers of Mammon results in eternal damnation!
Because we all know how much everyone pays attention to politics.
Now you want people who stay at home all the time surfing the net and watching daytime TV to make all the decisions.
Listen to your average talk radio caller (from BOTH sides), that would be the person sitting 24/7 infront of there computer pressing the [VOTE] button for every mundane issue that came through.
If you don't belive me, take a look at some of the fscking idiotic, or even cruel, decisions the ancient Athenian assembly (whose members were decided by lot) made.
http://www.fuelcellsworks.com/Supppage3616.html
I voted for Michael Badnarik, so piss off with the Bush accusations.
If all the effort everyone is putting into Kyoto was instead directed into deploying current Feul Cell technology a good portion of the problem would go away.
Instead we have whiney Euro politicians who want to appease their Green parties and stick it to the Americans, while avoiding fulfiling their obligations as much as humanly possible.
International Treaties aren't worth the paper they are written on.
... I break my leg and can't walk? Or when I do again its slightly different? Am I now unable to use my phone?
I'm too busy entertaining your mother. Apparently she wasn't too happy with the goat she fucked before you were born.
... Anonymous Coward's like you get sent to the layer of hell God specially reserved for fuckwits and child molesters.
We can make a special exception for the technically challanged.
Now all they need to do is make it so it can find more than 80% of the streets I am looking for.
... isn't a carte blanche for slander and libel.
It's a sad state of things when comments like this aren't rated higher.
I've always had the same hesitating suggestion: branch the wikipedia so that there's something like a "stable branch".
Of course, such a thing would be a logistical nightmare, and it's damn near impossible. However, I think it would be appreciated by a lot of people if some editorial process could be worked in somehow.
This is actually a very good idea.
A stub could start out as a beta, where it gets many edits. After a certain ammount of time/edits the entry could be forked into a RC and dev page. The RC could be locked and the dev maintained on a seperate tab (like the discussion or talk links are now). You could then put up a voting system where you can give a thumbs up or down.
If it gets a number of yes votes it could then be called a stable page (1.0) More edits would still be made on the dev page until it reaches the limit where it goes up for a up/down vote again, and a snapshot of the dev would go up for review. If it passes you could then have a 1.1 version of the page and continue adnausium.
This would provide a signifigant ammount of quality control on the page.
Someone please tell me how the hell this is redundant.
First open source certificate in the US?
Then what have I been doing for the past year at my colleges Redhat Academy? Training for a nonexistant RHCT?
Notebooks are rather hard to build on your own.
... move to Soviet Russia, you Tree Hugging Commie Pinko Terrorist.
Maybe you can form some kind of Beowulf Cluster Hippie Commune.
Some mods have no sense of humor, I swear.
Sarcasm, man, sarcasm.
Maybe you can form some kind of Beowulf Cluster Hippie Commune.
Horseshit.
t m
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/s/spacepen.h