Bad fashion, I know, but it is called the Emerson Effect. I am not sure if it applies to the blue/UV wavelengths, but I'm conducting horticultural research on that right now. We've already observed this in the red/IR spectrum, and on top of that we've seen that even exposing one leaf to such irradiation, even a lower leaf, causes the entire plant to react almost immediately.
The problem I see with this is the fact that certain wavelengths have certain interfering effects with other wavelengths. For example, 660-670nm radiation coupled with 720-740nm IR radiation causes some odd effects, which plants happen to utilize in photosynthesis, but I don't think we've ever tested such effects against the communication of data.
What are the wavelengths we're talking about here? Are we working in purely visible range, or are we expanding out to low-range IR and UV? Are we going deeper than that over fiber optic? Can we even potentially push microwaves over fiber optic lines since it is just EM and we're using glass as a conduit? Would the conduit need to be bigger than pencil-sized to accommodate wavelengths of such size?
I could ask questions about this for days. Please give me some information that could cut that time down to a week or so.
I do it for the morons that have to search the torrents for it as a separate set of words. I have the actual DVD collection, and while I know I paid for it, most likely won't and so they'll need a decent rip, so giving it out by name works better than having them hunt it down. I don't provide anything but words.
I've had issues even acquiring images under a 100x magnification lens with 200x the amount of photon flux. I'm talking about having replaced the crap incandescent filament bulb with LED and we still have problems even with the diodes being configured to output maximum luminous flux.
It's just a problem involving optical physics. Maybe when we get the lenses lined with a silver compound, we can get better resolution images.
"I wonder how many of you mouthpieces have done anything about your oil consumption?"
Quite a bit, on my end, anyways. I've cut my lighting power by 70%. I design energy-efficient hydroponics systems. I'm working on low-energy solutions that make it possible for man to live in space.
First, this is across state lines. Federal. This is also Unauthorized Access/Use of a Computer. Again, I think there's a federal statue against that.
You call the LOCAL (to the IP address) Federal authorities. If they say they won't help you after you've given them all the relevant information, you ask for their name, full. Then you tell them they've become an accomplice in this by refusing to comply with the law, and that you're going to get them arrested for accessory after the fact.
Then you call a lawyer and proceed to file a civil lawsuit against that agent.
You will have your laptop recovered. If you're not ballsy enough to badger the feds, then just give up and buy a new laptop.
The disease of chickenpox and the disease of smallpox and the disease of cowpox use the same attack vector and binding site, IIRC. Getting chickenpox and forming antibodies for that causes immunity to the other two.
I've been around many people with cowpox, I've worked on ranches. I've only had chickenpox and I've never contracted cowpox.
Slashdot Mirror
Neither. I grow landrace strains for genetic preservation for the Dutch.
"It's well understood."
Not in the horticultural world, it most certainly is not. You are aware there are more scientific industries than computer science, yes?
Bad fashion, I know, but it is called the Emerson Effect. I am not sure if it applies to the blue/UV wavelengths, but I'm conducting horticultural research on that right now. We've already observed this in the red/IR spectrum, and on top of that we've seen that even exposing one leaf to such irradiation, even a lower leaf, causes the entire plant to react almost immediately.
The problem I see with this is the fact that certain wavelengths have certain interfering effects with other wavelengths. For example, 660-670nm radiation coupled with 720-740nm IR radiation causes some odd effects, which plants happen to utilize in photosynthesis, but I don't think we've ever tested such effects against the communication of data.
What are the wavelengths we're talking about here? Are we working in purely visible range, or are we expanding out to low-range IR and UV? Are we going deeper than that over fiber optic? Can we even potentially push microwaves over fiber optic lines since it is just EM and we're using glass as a conduit? Would the conduit need to be bigger than pencil-sized to accommodate wavelengths of such size?
I could ask questions about this for days. Please give me some information that could cut that time down to a week or so.
I do it for the morons that have to search the torrents for it as a separate set of words. I have the actual DVD collection, and while I know I paid for it, most likely won't and so they'll need a decent rip, so giving it out by name works better than having them hunt it down. I don't provide anything but words.
I've got more of a clue than you when I've got a NASA contract for supplies and research.
Come back when you've got a clue about how much energy went into producing the fuel to put our asses in space.
Then bear in mind my panels cost less to put into space, purely by virtue of weight alone.
I think you're the one without a clue. Maybe when you actually talk to NASA, you can make a worth-while statement.
It honestly gets even more complex than that.
I've had issues even acquiring images under a 100x magnification lens with 200x the amount of photon flux. I'm talking about having replaced the crap incandescent filament bulb with LED and we still have problems even with the diodes being configured to output maximum luminous flux.
It's just a problem involving optical physics. Maybe when we get the lenses lined with a silver compound, we can get better resolution images.
I could give several reasons why not to convert your iPhone into a DSLR.
First reason - the iPhone camera has always sucked. I've had better quality from a parallel-port Logitech from the early 90s.
Second - no lens mount.
Third - no flash or ring-mounted flash? NO FLASH PERIOD BY ANY NAME?
Fuck you.
Sounds like a Planet ES story to me.
in which case, by all means, put an end to space junk before we need to go out there to collect it ourselves at those speeds.
"I wonder how many of you mouthpieces have done anything about your oil consumption?"
Quite a bit, on my end, anyways. I've cut my lighting power by 70%. I design energy-efficient hydroponics systems. I'm working on low-energy solutions that make it possible for man to live in space.
WHAT ARE YOU DOING?
"See now I know that's bullshit because LCDs dont have a refresh flicker like CRTs"
Hah, try playing a Wii game on an LCD using non-component cables. Specifically, try Dragon Ball Z: Budokai Tenkaichi 3.
If you can't see the LCD-emulated scanline flicker, something is wrong with your eyes.
No matter the claimed response time, yes, all LCDs give me some ghosting that I can easily perceive.
It is annoying, to say the least.
We've already had external GPUs for laptops. They failed horribly. That is why you don't see them.
As if it were not already embarassingly simple to obtain.
Just a couple days ago I read about people getting FECAL TRANSPLANTS to cure intestinal problems, now this.
Looks like the solutions to many of life's problems lies in the asshole.
"24Hz movie theaters must be unwatchable to you then. "
Absolutely unacceptable, in fact, and has been since I was a child.
And I can still see electron beam scanning refresh even on a 72hZ refresh on a CRT.
"Barring hardware problems you will see no flicker. Hate to break it to you but you do not have super vision. "
Too bad you failed to realize human vision is around 72Hz and not 60Hz, so your entire above statement is pure bullshit, or you're the defective one.
"Your PC must have had drivers installed with the glasses etc."
No, this capability was built into the TNT2 generation of cards made by ASUS. No drivers required, only the game had to support it.
DescentII in 3D was the shit.
Can we not form a lawsuit, the People versus the RIAA, for this absurdity? A full-on class action lawsuit to put a final end to this TERRORISM?
Fring is bullshit ripoff tech and Skype is piloted by a bunch of blind fag hags.
They're both useless wastes and to make it worse, when you buy any Skype service, THEY STILL SHOVE ADS DOWN YOUR THROAT.
It's really funny, no skype on iphone but Camfrog's working on a client.
I wonder how they're going to fit pro functionality on that?
That doesn't do jack if I take your gear while it's still on and unlocked and turn off the encryption and wipe the passwords before a reboot.
There is much opportunity here.
First, this is across state lines. Federal. This is also Unauthorized Access/Use of a Computer. Again, I think there's a federal statue against that.
You call the LOCAL (to the IP address) Federal authorities. If they say they won't help you after you've given them all the relevant information, you ask for their name, full. Then you tell them they've become an accomplice in this by refusing to comply with the law, and that you're going to get them arrested for accessory after the fact.
Then you call a lawyer and proceed to file a civil lawsuit against that agent.
You will have your laptop recovered. If you're not ballsy enough to badger the feds, then just give up and buy a new laptop.
The disease of chickenpox and the disease of smallpox and the disease of cowpox use the same attack vector and binding site, IIRC. Getting chickenpox and forming antibodies for that causes immunity to the other two.
I've been around many people with cowpox, I've worked on ranches. I've only had chickenpox and I've never contracted cowpox.