That's funny but it made me wonder how many things written by users to make their life easier/better that were then open sourced, ended up as projects, and are now used by a lot of people. The Linux kernel is one.
I downloaded it and liked it. I'd like to buy a copy next time I'm at fry's but will probably download the full version when they have it up. It kind of made me miss the good days of shareware and demo's. Game makers stopped doing it because people would try out the game and not buy it because it didn't live up to the hype. Or the game just flat out sucked. This games lives up to the hype and I will buy it. For some it might not have lived up to the hype so they will not buy it. So the download numbers are not a good sample to prove that people that downloaded it liked it and should therefore buy it.
That is only true with 2 stroke engines. I ran a KZ-400 (1974) and KZ-650 (1976) on a alcohol paint thinner mix for many years (aka poor man CAM2). I owned both motorcycles until 1988. I never rebuilt either engine and definitely never had a problem with water contamination. I did, however, replace the rubber tubing once but that would have been necessary anyway.
I put all of my passwords in a file on a USB drive locked with a password of the cto's choice. They are in an odf spreadsheet file encrypted with the same password. All cables, switches, wall, and punch ports are labeled. If someone takes over my position and can't figure it out from there then the cto got what he paid for.
I'm ready for the home inventor plastic making machines. Stuff your grass, shrub, and tree cuttings in one end and pull your invention out of the other. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_printing
I don't see a way to do it with the G1 but I would think you could.
Of course if your storing data from camera's etc... then you will need a small NAS or USB/eSATA storage system. You can make your own or buy something about anywhere these days.
I'm the same way when I'm researching something. The difference with me is when I drift off to something completely different I open a new window, move it to a different desktop, and then open tabs for where ever that topic leads me.
IMHO, if they could separate out the browsers functionality so it isn't used unless needed would be the best "addition". If I could, I would use applications specific to content I'm accessing by clicking on the non-html content to open it up with the dedicated application. ie. flash in a media player application, java in a java console/window, js+xul in xulrunner... In fact, I love tabs so much I would prefer those too were tabbed.
So what? The guys with little brains eat the guys with big brains. What is new about that? A quick google search of "RIAA vs." returns sufficient results to prove that case.
Unless they upload a replacement, the book would have to have all the possible tags attached. I'm assuming the books are on the device itself. Obviously, I don't know enough about the Kindle2.
To add to seqedunum's post. I use OpenVPN too. You don't HAVE to push anything through DNS but can and is probably the easiest. OpenVPN GUI for windows makes it easy for even the dumbest (marketing/sales department) people in the office to use. You can hard code the ip address as the destination in the config. All the user has to do is double click on an icon on their toolbar, login (or use a shared key), and p00f they are connected.
TFA goes as far as saying networking sockets are a proven technology. "is quite impressive for an API to have remained in use and largely unchanged for 27 years." Then wanders off with nothing more than an example of how something works better in a small area of networking. It is as if the writer is suggesting we should switch everything over to stateless protocols and blast servers with simultaneous connection requests or send back 8-16 packets at the same time to a client. That would be insane. And, I hope not what he was intending. Not that the bandwidth could/should be there but if you think about what can be done by a bad guy under the cover of 8-16 packets being sent at one time from 8-16 different ports. As far as other protocols go (TCP) some of us prefer all of the checks involved using sockets. FTFA"The typical processing loop of a sockets-based program isnâ(TM)t simply read(), process(), read(), but instead select(), read(), process(), select()." I would rather have a lock than a buffer overflow. The faster the machine the less important that lock gets. The importance of security doesn't shrink. Applications that are currently using UDP (with the exception of applications that transfer very little information DNS/NTP) would be much better off using SCTP. Multihomed transfers of data would be useful to simplify bandwidth sharing designs. ie. one home for each isp without a separate load balancing software is possible with applications designed around SCTP. So SCTP, and other stateless transaction protocols, do work better without having to have a single socket open to send packets through when multiple packets can be sent to multiple destinations simultaneously. Statefull applications, however, are best left to reliable old sockets.
I don't agree. I planted a lot of stuff this spring and a lot of it disappeared. The funny thing is, they were replaced with weird crispy brown look-a-likes.
Slashdot Mirror
That's funny but it made me wonder how many things written by users to make their life easier/better that were then open sourced, ended up as projects, and are now used by a lot of people. The Linux kernel is one.
We don't care.
Not true. If timothy starts wearing ties, or worse, where does that leave the rest of us?
I never heard of them. It looks like they are basically the same thing as freshmeat.net but with statistics tools for projects.
I downloaded it and liked it. I'd like to buy a copy next time I'm at fry's but will probably download the full version when they have it up. It kind of made me miss the good days of shareware and demo's. Game makers stopped doing it because people would try out the game and not buy it because it didn't live up to the hype. Or the game just flat out sucked. This games lives up to the hype and I will buy it. For some it might not have lived up to the hype so they will not buy it. So the download numbers are not a good sample to prove that people that downloaded it liked it and should therefore buy it.
Canoogle?
Wow. It looks like there is a reason for a windows vm on my dev machine after all. Thanks!
That is only true with 2 stroke engines. I ran a KZ-400 (1974) and KZ-650 (1976) on a alcohol paint thinner mix for many years (aka poor man CAM2). I owned both motorcycles until 1988. I never rebuilt either engine and definitely never had a problem with water contamination. I did, however, replace the rubber tubing once but that would have been necessary anyway.
...allows them to easily steal that property and sell...
If "them" can sell it then the internet hasn't decreased its value. His argument proves the opponent's case.
I put all of my passwords in a file on a USB drive locked with a password of the cto's choice. They are in an odf spreadsheet file encrypted with the same password. All cables, switches, wall, and punch ports are labeled. If someone takes over my position and can't figure it out from there then the cto got what he paid for.
That is total bullshit! If a guy brings a gun to a knife fight he is smart not evil. :p
I'm ready for the home inventor plastic making machines. Stuff your grass, shrub, and tree cuttings in one end and pull your invention out of the other. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3D_printing
If your applications are google centric and your not doing anything intensive (video editing) then you should be good with an iPhone and keyboard.
http://hackaday.com/2009/03/24/external-keyboard-with-an-iphone/
I don't see a way to do it with the G1 but I would think you could.
Of course if your storing data from camera's etc... then you will need a small NAS or USB/eSATA storage system. You can make your own or buy something about anywhere these days.
No. He meant crippling the software using the software not crippling the hardware by installing the software. Close though.
I'm the same way when I'm researching something. The difference with me is when I drift off to something completely different I open a new window, move it to a different desktop, and then open tabs for where ever that topic leads me.
IMHO, if they could separate out the browsers functionality so it isn't used unless needed would be the best "addition". If I could, I would use applications specific to content I'm accessing by clicking on the non-html content to open it up with the dedicated application. ie. flash in a media player application, java in a java console/window, js+xul in xulrunner... In fact, I love tabs so much I would prefer those too were tabbed.
But what if stupid women are the only ones that say yes? Ummm... was that too much information?
So what? The guys with little brains eat the guys with big brains. What is new about that? A quick google search of "RIAA vs." returns sufficient results to prove that case.
And, FRED isn't dead. Sadly, it isn't open source either which, IMHO, would allow it to replace OO.
http://www.framework.com/
mexico = "don't drink the water".
spain = "don't breath the air".
got it. brb
How ironic. I was going to suggest testing on birds to see if it kills off bird biting mosquitoes.
http://www.dem.ri.gov/news/2000/pr/1002002.htm
If we could merge mosquito DNA with firefly DNA there would be a mechanism. Blink+Splat=Human
Unless they upload a replacement, the book would have to have all the possible tags attached. I'm assuming the books are on the device itself. Obviously, I don't know enough about the Kindle2.
To add to seqedunum's post. I use OpenVPN too. You don't HAVE to push anything through DNS but can and is probably the easiest. OpenVPN GUI for windows makes it easy for even the dumbest (marketing/sales department) people in the office to use. You can hard code the ip address as the destination in the config. All the user has to do is double click on an icon on their toolbar, login (or use a shared key), and p00f they are connected.
TFA goes as far as saying networking sockets are a proven technology. "is quite impressive for an API to have remained in use and largely unchanged for 27 years." Then wanders off with nothing more than an example of how something works better in a small area of networking. It is as if the writer is suggesting we should switch everything over to stateless protocols and blast servers with simultaneous connection requests or send back 8-16 packets at the same time to a client. That would be insane. And, I hope not what he was intending. Not that the bandwidth could/should be there but if you think about what can be done by a bad guy under the cover of 8-16 packets being sent at one time from 8-16 different ports. As far as other protocols go (TCP) some of us prefer all of the checks involved using sockets. FTFA"The typical processing loop of a sockets-based program isnâ(TM)t simply read(), process(), read(), but instead select(), read(), process(), select()." I would rather have a lock than a buffer overflow. The faster the machine the less important that lock gets. The importance of security doesn't shrink. Applications that are currently using UDP (with the exception of applications that transfer very little information DNS/NTP) would be much better off using SCTP. Multihomed transfers of data would be useful to simplify bandwidth sharing designs. ie. one home for each isp without a separate load balancing software is possible with applications designed around SCTP. So SCTP, and other stateless transaction protocols, do work better without having to have a single socket open to send packets through when multiple packets can be sent to multiple destinations simultaneously. Statefull applications, however, are best left to reliable old sockets.
I don't agree. I planted a lot of stuff this spring and a lot of it disappeared. The funny thing is, they were replaced with weird crispy brown look-a-likes.
Wow! It is amazing how those numbers look like the minimal and maximum iso install downloads for a Linux distro.