Go to the pet store and puchase three healthy mice for a buck fifty and feed each feed them a diet devoid of vitamin A and keep them away from sunlight.
Bingo three blind mice for 4.50 plus tax.
Savings $245.50.
You can create your own, large varity of custom mice through changes in diet environment and selective inbreeding.
The newspaper has no business blogging. Let the author do it on his/ger own and take the glory and the heat for it- it's not what a newspaper is about.
Shame on them for pretending to blog and shame on them for cowarding out.
What's unimpressive is that the stardust mission is actually the first of the two missions and genisis is the second.
NASA 'trimming' of standards and budgets for lean cost savings doomed the launched in 2001 genesis mission and the older 1999 launched more expensive stardust succeeded.
I'm sure I'm not the only one that sees the torpedo being loaded by Microsoft.
But there are lots of folks that are too trusting of lawyers and eager for M$ money.
My mothers is on what you apparently describe as total life support and somehow my concern is proprietary software vs. opensource software and the percentage mix of the two.
What kind of monster thinks that way.
Actually I'm probably haranguing the attending physician about not keep his blog up to date and he's making an excuse that his proprietary pocket computer is not talking to his proprietary desktop and as soon as the proprietary software company issues service pack 12 it should all be cleared up.
That of cource provided the Presidents Council on Morality and Medicine makes an exception to the 'No Sunday left Behind' bill that prevents ALL work on the official sabbath.
$25 a month unlimited domestic long distance, no restrictions on calling within network, no watching the clock for weekend or after 9pm.
I dunno, it's cheaper than voip and in the state I am in I can't have DSL without being subscribed to Smell South for residential wireline.
Cable is provided by a very unreliable unaccountable monopoly municipality.
That's why.
No doubt Davie Dorfman is the -most clueless- CEO AT&T has ever had, but the guy really calling the shots is Hossain Eslambolchi and his failure record is legendary, only exceeded by his boundless Iranian Refugee ego.
Got to correct you.
Qwest was never part of AT&T, U.S. West was and Qwest merged with US West and the new company is called QWEST.
This whole debacle goes back to 1982 and the setlement AT&T offered.
All the govermnment was looking for was the removal of AT&T's exclusive manufacture or control of equipment and allowing resale.
What AT&T offered instead was a breakup, spinning off the Local Exchange Loops (percieved as more expensive to operate and less lucerative in profits).
So far it looks like everything has gone according to plan with the exception of the 1996 Telecommunications act which allowed Local Exchange Carriers into the Long Distance game and didn't provide proper provisions for allowing access to the local Exchange by the LD carriers.
In the end it really doesn't matter because if you look at the boards of all these companies you will see that all the players are interchangable and are really playing the same game.
I read someone earlier that said that all the innovation we have had would not have happened without the breakup. False.
These changes were coming with or without a breakup. It was all a matter of regulation, Tymnet, CompuServe, Delphi, Fidonet, and The Source were fledgeling precursors indicating a commercial evolution of something approximating an internet.
FCC regulation was opening bandwidth to mobile phone technology.
And hardware innovation only required the removal of WECO exclusivity, which the government was going to impliment with or without a breakup.
The innovation could have actually been greater if the network itself had remained intact.
I have not seen an article with enough detail as yet to draw -any- conclusions about this macaque.
Your statement 'the absence of any substantial population of bipedal primates today dillutes (but doesn't necessarily refute) Darwin's arguments for change over time' is about as misleading as one could ask for.
There have been a variety of bipedal primates documented, with a high probability that the last remaining biped(homo sapiens) having killed off the Neandertal who had existed at the same time.
Also you neglect an unavoidable part of selection, the unfit will not survive and at times being of the survior type is a best a roll of the dice, the survivor for one environment is the failure of another.
The change over time would seem dramatic to any of the failing individuals directly envolved.
'I hope that you are really going to go back to the moon even though the congress apparently cut the funding? Anyway, next year the new budget plan for ESA's Aurora will be outlined, apparently. This program's goal is to land people on the moon and Mars within 30 years. Hopefully they will do it, especially if noone else will. Personally I hope both NASA and ESA will go for it.'
Considering that the United States put a man on the moon in 8 years, and had they continued could have put a man on mars in 14 years, I suppose the ESA should be able to pull it off 30 years.
Even if they manage to hold(pull) the European Union togeter, they're going to be way late because the Chinese are going to beat the ESA by at least 15 years.
A good release will often contain the phrase: 'For valuable consideration, I hereby give the above photographer permission to use...'
In some locales, and some rulings this has been enforced and the photographs you thought you could use without consideration may not be 'all yours' without some form of payment. Some judges require REAL VALUE to be exchanged for the contract to be binding.
Your contract could show that you subtracted $1 (the typical amount accepted) from the total charges for the job, or if it's just a single model shoot then you could make it a pics for trade and assign the value of the pics as $1.
It's not universal but if you want to be safe there's never any doubt if there's a signature, copy of id and valuable consideration.
Who knows what future celebrity might be in your files.
I said a release is required for it to be used as such, but please be aware that your release and contract may be worthless unless you also pay your customer in some form.
Sorry but as hard as it is to be a professional photographer, in some ways we've been getting away with some things we shouldn't have for a long time.
In other ways as you know, it's far too easy for us to also get screwed.
The photographs taken of you are of no use to the photographer without a release, I've done this with customers in exchange for a lower rate for the job.
The only thing the photographer can ever do with the pictures from your wedding legally without a release is to put them in his book. He cannot really even sell them to your relatives, although it is accepted practice.
Look for a photographer that will do the job as 'work for hire', he provides the equipment, skill and time to take the photographs, you provide the film or payment for film and you process the film and have pictures made.
With a traditional wedding photographer your paying for a lot more than simply someone who 'takes pictures', your paying for a variety of professional services (overhead, knowledge, poses, processing, album, packaging, and a lot more time than you realise).
Put an advert in the paper asking for a work for hire photographer and require samples.
Everybody (on the right) wants to call Moore a communist so..... give'm a reason.
But seriously this seems to me really to be more like a Grateful Dead way of doing things. Moore has made all he is going to so get the message as far and wide as you can.
And then if the stormtroopers get the theaters shut down and block/edit the DVD release the movie is still out there.
ZD Publications sent me an email offering me a complimentary issue of the new Sync 'Lifestyle' magazine.
I went against my better judgement and signed up for nostalgia reasons* figuring on getting the one issue and canceling.
Now I'm getting invoices for a full year via email and postal mail with no option to cancel, and I've yet to recieve the 'complimentary issue'.
They'll get squat from me and I resent having to spend the postage to contact them to cancel something I did not order Ziff Davis is dead to me, I'll never buy another publication with thier name on it.
* Ages ago Sync was a magazine covering the Sinclair and Timex/Sinclair computers.
I am curious how long this problem has been around.
I checked and duplicated the problem on Netscape 7.1 and Firefox.8
However the problem does not exist with Netscape Communicator 4.8 and probably never has since I recall the original Netscape documentation containing information on security that frames could only be changed by frames from the same domain.
Anyone running IE with the current help file keylogger problem is asking for worse than spoofing.
Somebody broke something, after the version 4 browsers and the fix is not to get rid of frames, but repair the dom model in the browsers.
Quit using your ISP's antispam features, if you cannot turn them off yourself, demand that your ISP turn them off for you.
Then install POPFile and take ownership of your own email.
Have your customers/others do the same.
It's the job of ICANN & IANA to get a grip on the SPAM issue, they are issuing numbers and access to authorities that do not deserve it, and have not fulfilled thier roles as governing bodies.
Slashdot Mirror
Go to the pet store and puchase three healthy mice for a buck fifty and feed each feed them a diet devoid of vitamin A and keep them away from sunlight. Bingo three blind mice for 4.50 plus tax. Savings $245.50. You can create your own, large varity of custom mice through changes in diet environment and selective inbreeding.
They should blog using slashcode and moderation.
The newspaper has no business blogging.
Let the author do it on his/ger own and take the glory and the heat for it- it's not what a newspaper is about.
Shame on them for pretending to blog and shame on them for cowarding out.
What's unimpressive is that the stardust mission is actually the first of the two missions and genisis is the second.
NASA 'trimming' of standards and budgets for lean cost savings doomed the launched in 2001 genesis mission and the older 1999 launched more expensive stardust succeeded.
The article is NOT pretty good, and I have to wonder who the anonymous coward was that submitted it.
Mambo management sought to highjack the entire project and the work of the developers and retake it private.
They were called on it and are now in a situation where they continue to behave badly. (As this article shows)
I'm sure I'm not the only one that sees the torpedo being loaded by Microsoft. But there are lots of folks that are too trusting of lawyers and eager for M$ money.
Right like chemistry, optics, programming and mathmatics have nothing in common? Kodak has a mathmatics IP portfolio to die for.
Quite right and you ahven't added in the value of Eastman Chemical and other spin offs.
Based on this photograph .
I would have thought -all- members of the finnish army were internet addicts.
Like I was in a twilight zone episode.
My mothers is on what you apparently describe as total life support and somehow my concern is proprietary software vs. opensource software and the percentage mix of the two.
What kind of monster thinks that way.
Actually I'm probably haranguing the attending physician about not keep his blog up to date and he's making an excuse that his proprietary pocket computer is not talking to his proprietary desktop and as soon as the proprietary software company issues service pack 12 it should all be cleared up.
That of cource provided the Presidents Council on Morality and Medicine makes an exception to the 'No Sunday left Behind' bill that prevents ALL work on the official sabbath.
... why would you even want to use AT&T?
$25 a month unlimited domestic long distance, no restrictions on calling within network, no watching the clock for weekend or after 9pm.
I dunno, it's cheaper than voip and in the state I am in I can't have DSL without being subscribed to Smell South for residential wireline.
Cable is provided by a very unreliable unaccountable monopoly municipality.
That's why.
No doubt Davie Dorfman is the -most clueless- CEO AT&T has ever had, but the guy really calling the shots is Hossain Eslambolchi and his failure record is legendary, only exceeded by his boundless Iranian Refugee ego.
Got to correct you.
Qwest was never part of AT&T, U.S. West was and Qwest merged with US West and the new company is called QWEST.
This whole debacle goes back to 1982 and the setlement AT&T offered.
All the govermnment was looking for was the removal of AT&T's exclusive manufacture or control of equipment and allowing resale.
What AT&T offered instead was a breakup, spinning off the Local Exchange Loops (percieved as more expensive to operate and less lucerative in profits).
So far it looks like everything has gone according to plan with the exception of the 1996 Telecommunications act which allowed Local Exchange Carriers into the Long Distance game and didn't provide proper provisions for allowing access to the local Exchange by the LD carriers.
In the end it really doesn't matter because if you look at the boards of all these companies you will see that all the players are interchangable and are really playing the same game.
I read someone earlier that said that all the innovation we have had would not have happened without the breakup. False.
These changes were coming with or without a breakup.
It was all a matter of regulation, Tymnet, CompuServe, Delphi, Fidonet, and The Source were fledgeling precursors indicating a commercial evolution of something approximating an internet.
FCC regulation was opening bandwidth to mobile phone technology.
And hardware innovation only required the removal of WECO exclusivity, which the government was going to impliment with or without a breakup.
The innovation could have actually been greater if the network itself had remained intact.
Yeah I've heard that, but DNA says they are probably not relatives of ours.
At least one wasn't.
I have not seen an article with enough detail as yet to draw -any- conclusions about this macaque.
Your statement 'the absence of any substantial population of bipedal primates today dillutes (but doesn't necessarily refute) Darwin's arguments for change over time' is about as misleading as one could ask for.
There have been a variety of bipedal primates documented, with a high probability that the last remaining biped(homo sapiens) having killed off the Neandertal who had existed at the same time.
Also you neglect an unavoidable part of selection, the unfit will not survive and at times being of the survior type is a best a roll of the dice, the survivor for one environment is the failure of another.
The change over time would seem dramatic to any of the failing individuals directly envolved.
'I hope that you are really going to go back to the moon even though the congress apparently cut the funding? Anyway, next year the new budget plan for ESA's Aurora will be outlined, apparently. This program's goal is to land people on the moon and Mars within 30 years. Hopefully they will do it, especially if noone else will. Personally I hope both NASA and ESA will go for it.'
Considering that the United States put a man on the moon in 8 years, and had they continued could have put a man on mars in 14 years, I suppose the ESA should be able to pull it off 30 years.
Even if they manage to hold(pull) the European Union togeter, they're going to be way late because the Chinese are going to beat the ESA by at least 15 years.
A good release will often contain the phrase:
'For valuable consideration, I hereby give the above photographer permission to use...'
In some locales, and some rulings this has been enforced and the photographs you thought you could use without consideration may not be 'all yours' without some form of payment.
Some judges require REAL VALUE to be exchanged for the contract to be binding.
Your contract could show that you subtracted $1 (the typical amount accepted) from the total charges for the job, or if it's just a single model shoot then you could make it a pics for trade and assign the value of the pics as $1.
It's not universal but if you want to be safe there's never any doubt if there's a signature, copy of id and valuable consideration.
Who knows what future celebrity might be in your files.
your paying for "you're". Golly goshunks thankyee fur kurrektin my inglish. twit
Did I say any different?
I said a release is required for it to be used as such, but please be aware that your release and contract may be worthless unless you also pay your customer in some form.
Sorry but as hard as it is to be a professional photographer, in some ways we've been getting away with some things we shouldn't have for a long time.
In other ways as you know, it's far too easy for us to also get screwed.
The photographs taken of you are of no use to the photographer without a release, I've done this with customers in exchange for a lower rate for the job.
The only thing the photographer can ever do with the pictures from your wedding legally without a release is to put them in his book. He cannot really even sell them to your relatives, although it is accepted practice.
Look for a photographer that will do the job as 'work for hire', he provides the equipment, skill and time to take the photographs, you provide the film or payment for film and you process the film and have pictures made.
With a traditional wedding photographer your paying for a lot more than simply someone who 'takes pictures', your paying for a variety of professional services (overhead, knowledge, poses, processing, album, packaging, and a lot more time than you realise).
Put an advert in the paper asking for a work for hire photographer and require samples.
Smart!
Everybody (on the right) wants to call Moore a communist so..... give'm a reason.
But seriously this seems to me really to be more like a Grateful Dead way of doing things. Moore has made all he is going to so get the message as far and wide as you can.
And then if the stormtroopers get the theaters shut down and block/edit the DVD release the movie is still out there.
ZD Publications sent me an email offering me a complimentary issue of the new Sync 'Lifestyle' magazine.
I went against my better judgement and signed up for nostalgia reasons* figuring on getting the one issue and canceling.
Now I'm getting invoices for a full year via email and postal mail with no option to cancel, and I've yet to recieve the 'complimentary issue'.
They'll get squat from me and I resent having to spend the postage to contact them to cancel something I did not order Ziff Davis is dead to me, I'll never buy another publication with thier name on it.
* Ages ago Sync was a magazine covering the Sinclair and Timex/Sinclair computers.
I am curious how long this problem has been around.
I checked and duplicated the problem on Netscape 7.1 and Firefox
However the problem does not exist with Netscape Communicator 4.8 and probably never has since I recall the original Netscape documentation containing information on security that frames could only be changed by frames from the same domain.
Anyone running IE with the current help file keylogger problem is asking for worse than spoofing.
Somebody broke something, after the version 4 browsers and the fix is not to get rid of frames, but repair the dom model in the browsers.
Quit using your ISP's antispam features, if you cannot turn them off yourself, demand that your ISP turn them off for you.
Then install POPFile and take ownership of your own email.
Have your customers/others do the same.
It's the job of ICANN & IANA to get a grip on the SPAM issue,
they are issuing numbers and access to authorities that do not deserve it,
and have not fulfilled thier roles as governing bodies.
Anonymously wishing another person dead, rather than wishing or praying for a change of heart, enlightenment or resolve.
You know what?
FUCK You
Thank you Mr. Unelected Vice President for re-empowering the most memorable word of protest from the Vietnam era.
STFU, I thought the Republican Party had that one copyrighted.