Slashdot Mirror


Net Addiction Gets Finnish Soldiers Out Of Army

nerdb0t writes "Reuters is reporting that the Finnish Defense Forces have allowed some men to be excused from military service because of 'Internet Addiction.' The service period is 6 months - but that's too long away from the internet for these guys. Is this a joke? Is this a legitimate illness? Hm..where can I apply for disability..."

612 comments

  1. i have this illness by SnprBoB86 · · Score: 5, Funny

    apparent b/c i got first post.. i must be addicted to the net or at least slash dot

    --
    http://brandonbloom.name
    1. Re:i have this illness by Sibshops · · Score: 1

      First there is poor eyesight and now internet addiction? Are there any slashdotters reading this that are fit-to-serve?

    2. Re:i have this illness by phre4k · · Score: 1

      Sure. I am fit to serve, but didn't because I was lucky and took the right number from the pile. Don't know if you draw numbers in the US too.

      --
      "Nobody really checks their email any more. They just delete their spam"
    3. Re:i have this illness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US didn't have a draft since Vietnam.

    4. Re:i have this illness by luqmanz · · Score: 1

      in my homecountry (malaysia) this service is compulsory to all 18 year-olds ... never heard or anyone being excused because of net-addiction. That kind of addiction need medical attention.

    5. Re:i have this illness by WebCrapper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is another odd rule in Europe as well - Stress Leave. Its a treatable illness here and you can take paid time off from work for it. Unfortunately, the US Military or GS's stationed here can't take advantage of such a rule...

      When I was younger, a bus load of American kids put on of their Dutch bus drivers on stress leave for 6 months... Unfortunately, I wasn't riding the bus the day it happened, but heard it was a blast.

    6. Re:i have this illness by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 1

      Which country again? I'm from Malaysia, and AFAIK the service is only compulsory to about 18% of 18 year-olds selected by lottery, and that the 'service' is non-strenuous and more of a fun-and-games camping trip to promote racial integration rather than for national defence.

    7. Re:i have this illness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      From the article " "...compulsory six months in the forces.

      We are very proud of our Finnish men. Eight-two percent of all Finnish men manage their whole military service," Kivela said."

      Wow, impressive. 82% of their men are able to handle an entire 6 months of military service. That's barely basic training and AIT, why bother?

    8. Re:i have this illness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basic training can be done in 3 months. If it takes longer for you to do you are the one that should be mocked;)

    9. Re:i have this illness by Dan93 · · Score: 1

      Basic Training, and AIT. That's generaly 3 months for basic, and the same for AIT(Advanced Individual Training, which is what you specialize in when your in the U.S. military).

    10. Re:i have this illness by phizzits · · Score: 1

      I haven't even started high school, and I go to bed at around 2 am and wake up at 1 every night. I would have to agree that this is not an illness but a summer lifestyle. But I think not challenging it and giving men 6 months to change their ways is the absolute worst way to solve it. Give them responsibilities for a change, and they'll know to stop.

  2. Slashdot is why by BillLeeLee · · Score: 5, Funny

    "If I can't get my daily dose of slashdot, I'll go crazy and kill some endangered animals" - Finnish soldier

    --
    www.google.com
    1. Re:Slashdot is why by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oooh boy! Someone fix these 503's!!!

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    2. Re:Slashdot is why by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

      I finally got through the 503s. . .to a 500.

      KFG

    3. Re:Slashdot is why by rofa · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, You're improving. Soon you'll be down to 404 :-)

      --
      No sig. Go away.
    4. Re:Slashdot is why by schiefaw · · Score: 1

      After some experimentation I had determined that the 503 errors have something to do with loading your personal profile. When I can't load the page through slashdot.org, I can still load it with 66.35.250.150. This will not present your custom page, however.

      --
      Angleyne: You can't bend that girder - it's unbendable! Bender: Well I don't know anything about lifting, so that ju
  3. Oh Crap!! by Spua7 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Now I am am going to get locked up and forced to take medications. Please don't tell anyone.

    1. Re:Oh Crap!! by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Now I am am going to get locked up and forced to take medications. Please don't tell anyone.

      Take two BFG an hour.

    2. Re:Oh Crap!! by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Rectally.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  4. oww by JoeShmoe950 · · Score: 0

    I know that computers can be addictive. Its hurt my own life a good bit. Half the things I should do, I never get around to doing because I just want to get back to the computer. Still, if your joining the army, you can afford to get off the net. Its not that bad. I once went on a 6 week vacation, and stayed of the internet for all of it, except for those internet cafes. oh, nevermind, I give up!
    http://www.givedanmoney.com/

    1. Re:oww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Did you think we couldn't read your sig because it just wasn't bold enough? I cannot fathom why you would bother to put your URL in the message text when you already had it in your signature. Trying to invite negative metamods?

    2. Re:oww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Still, if your joining the army, you can afford to get off the net"

      In finland the army service is mandatorial.

    3. Re:oww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Military service is mandatory in Finland, and min. service time is 180 days, max. 362 days. You can also carry out the service as civil service (395 days) and in some cases as unarmed military service (330 days if I remember correctly).

      www.mil.fi

      Those that refuse to enter even civil service can be sentenced to (usually a minimum security) prison for 197 days (max.).

    4. Re:oww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      -In finland the army service is mandatorial.

      No no no, in Finland the army is _Mandalorian_

      RsG :)

    5. Re:oww by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      >max. 362 days.

      Do they have to import experienced officers?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    6. Re:oww by klmth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Umm, the conscripts serve 362 days at most. If you want to become an officer, you have several routes to choose from.

      1. Go to the military academy (Officers)
      2. School yourself in some civlian field and join later with your crendentials (i.e. electric engineers and the like) (Warrant officers)
      3. Sign up after the army (NCOs).

      It's entirely possible to make a career out of the army. Just because the conscription term is max. 362 days doesn't exclude anyone from staying longer as long as they work for the military.

    7. Re:oww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent down -1, Star Wars Nerd

    8. Re:oww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      383 days max, when going to Reserve Officer School in the latter half of your service.

    9. Re:oww by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Something tells me he wanted his sig to be seen by ACs, and he forgot to turn it off. This is why SCO-bombing in your sig doesn't work, as Google is an AC.

    10. Re:oww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wouldn't call it a prison of any kind
      all "prisoners" are free to come and go as they please and have friends over etc
      you only have to come back to your "cell" for the night

    11. Re:oww by mojine · · Score: 1

      "Mandatorial!?" You sure your name's not Bush?

      --
      "It's not how many people I've killed - it's how I get along with the ones that are still alive."
  5. Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, they were not excused from military service, they were sent home and told to grow up and return in a few years for another try.

    1. Re:Not quite by sopuli · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yep, this is standard practice in the Finnish army. If you break down and say you can't take it anymore, for whatever reason, you can get out. But you'll have to come back after a few years (the assumption being that you have grown up a bit).

    2. Re:Not quite by Basehart · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "standard practice in the Finnish army "

      That reminds me, how come a country as small Finland is capable of producing two world class Formula One drivers (Mika Häkkinen and Kimi Raikkonen) and a world class rally car driver (Tommi Makkinen) among others?

      This is all the more amazing when a country the size of the USA produces, erm, none!

      What's that all about;-)

    3. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well the problem is most of the yankee imperialist bastards don't even know what Formula One is... If they did the "greatest nation in the world"[sic] would obviously produce the greatest F1 drivers in the world.

    4. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how the "yankee imperialist bastards's" Imperialist Basketball Team got their asses kicked by some loosers from Italy yesterday!

    5. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is all the more amazing when a country the size of the USA produces, erm, none!

      Not at all amazing since Formula One has little to no popularity in the USA. Don't you see that? you guys wank over your sports, we have ours.

    6. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Italy is also now in the "with the terrorists" column. Italy will be shocked and awed with the Operation Pizza Hut!

    7. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how the "yankee imperialist bastards's" Imperialist Basketball Team got their asses kicked by some loosers from Italy yesterday!

      Wank over that fuckwad!

    8. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Haha. So you need to be grown up to join the military? The biggest kindergarden in the world. Look at how some Americans acted in Iraq. Is that grown up?

      Some of you Americans should get out in the world to see the big picture. Get intouch with reality.

      Peace

    9. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you insensitive clod - I'm not an American!

    10. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, then you shouldn't take offense for the remark about the Americans. :)

    11. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you hate America? We have never wronged anyone? We are only hated for our freedom. That is why Denmark is under constant terrorist attacks. Because they have freedom like we do!

    12. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think America is hated becuase of the freedom. I think the reason of hate now is because of Bush.

    13. Re:Not quite by drooling-dog · · Score: 4, Funny
      Actually, they were not excused from military service, they were sent home and told to grow up and return in a few years for another try.

      If my experience is any guide, the affliction doesn't get any better with age.

    14. Re:Not quite by TV-SET · · Score: 1

      Driving on the wrong side? :)
      Sorry, just couldn't resist.

      --
      Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
    15. Re:Not quite by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      **Not at all amazing since Formula One has little to no popularity in the USA. Don't you see that? you guys wank over your sports, we have ours.**

      not really, you see USA _has_ a GP.. Finland doesn't.

      and another thing. these net addicts would just need to learn how to 'play' the army game and get into some post where they can use a computer all week long..

      (and fewer and fewer people are getting out in 6 months, also an issue of knowing how to play the army game if you don't want to be in for 9 or 12.. some do however)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    16. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, what terrorist attacks in Denmark are you talking about?? The last "terrorist attack" was during WW2, when the freedom fighters bombed railways in german occupied Denmark.

      And by the way... Denmark has freedom, but the difference is that we don't try to make other countries free by bombing them and then force democracy. All danish military units abroad are strictly peace keeping forces, logistics or intelligence.

      Get your facts straight!

    17. Re:Not quite by Basehart · · Score: 1

      Do F1 racers truly drive against the earth's flow? As opposed to Nascar drivers who merely drive to and fro, over and over again.

    18. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am pretty sure that the poster was being facetious.

    19. Re:Not quite by value_added · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yep, this is standard practice in the Finnish army. If you break down and say you can't take it anymore, for whatever reason, you can get out.

      So, if George Bush had been born elsewhere ...

    20. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... he'd still be an idiot who claims he has never made a mistake!?

    21. Re:Not quite by ma++i+ude · · Score: 4, Informative
      That reminds me, how come a country as small Finland is capable of producing two world class Formula One drivers (Mika Häkkinen and Kimi Raikkonen) and a world class rally car driver (Tommi Makkinen) among others?

      I think the rally driver bit can be explained by the fact that the countryside is full of small gravel roads which, in addition, are covered in snow and ice half of the year. The kids who are unfortunate enough to live there have nothing else to do so they end up driving around in old non-licensed cars. There even exists a term for these cards: peltoauto (field card). I never heard the word before I went to the army and actually met people from the Finnish periphery (kind of a tautology...)

      F1 is more of a mystery. The drivers seem to be coming from places with paved roads. Go-karting? Anyway, we have produced more than those two F1 drivers (I'd argue any F1 driver is by definition a world class driver): Keke Rosberg (1982 world champion), Mika Hakkinen, J.J. Lehto, Mika Salo, and Kimi Raikkonen.

      --
      You can't shut us down! The Internet is about the free exchange and sale of other people's ideas!
    22. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, do you really want a person with a mental health problem handling a Gun.

    23. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehrm, so the danish force in iraq are peace keepers? Even the torture accused danish officer?

    24. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only people with mental health problems want to handle guns.

    25. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go through it a few times. They usually get the message after you have kept coming and going for long enough.

    26. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, OK, the *purpose* of the danish force is to be peace keepers. That doesn't change just because some stupid officer(s) don't know how to behave. Anyway, what happened is still unclear, but the latest news is that the accusations about torture was made by an interpretor, who wanted revenge because he was fired.

    27. Re:Not quite by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes I totally agree. But where most foreigners fail to make the connection is that Bush != America. At least 50% of America doesn't like him and wants him out of office. He got into office through a lawsuit (which is a whole other topic) and alot of those who even do like him don't want to be at war. I personally think we need to focus more on our economy, etc... rather then going out trying to be some gun slinging hero. Bush is not the typical American, he's got millions, and I think the money and power just got to his head. Personally, some arguments make sense as far as freeing Iraq, but I mean we should of at least had NATO or several other large countries backing us up.
      Regards,
      Steve

    28. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you do realize that it was a tiny percentage of the 300,000 soldiers involved in Iraq.

      i wont ever defend those few that did horrible things (and i hope they pay for them)

      but give me a break.

    29. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When they have grown up"... Somehow i feel it is the opposite! ;)

      My feeling is that if i had waited a few years the army would have been too much to bear. When you are 19 years old you can adjust to a system like that, i think that if i had been something like 23 years old the army would have just seemed too oppressive and pointless to me.

      Though it seems like the Finnish army has become a lot softer in the 10 years that have passed since my military service.

      Anyhow, i wasn't aware of the internet back then. In the signal corps we however had some very interesting communications technology... Maybe those geeks should just be sent to the signal corps, where they have similar toys to play with?

    30. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the US team pussed out due to security concerns...so that's our B team.

    31. Re:Not quite by magefile · · Score: 1

      ... then I wouldn't care, because the Constitution would prevent him from being POTUS anyway!

    32. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And only people with mental health problems want to never handle a gun.
      So everyone has mental health problems.

    33. Re:Not quite by Cromac · · Score: 1

      How many Nascar winners are from Europe again? None?

    34. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      At least 50% of America doesn't like him and wants him out of office.

      Not according to the latest CNN poll which has Bush at over 50%. In other words MOST of America DOES like him and wants to KEEP him in office.

    35. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ABC has 47% giving the Shrub a favorable rating, and CBS has 40%. Both are more recent than the CNN poll (by one day). Also the question was whether the respondent had a favorable or unfavorable opinion of the man, not whether the respondent wanted to keeep him in office (quite a different question).

    36. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At best that still means 40% of the people polled are fucking morons who support a terrorist monkey-man. I weep for the future of America and fear for the safty of everyone else in the world.

    37. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you have an excuse like "my mum dropped me when i was 2" for being so absolutely blatantly stupid=)

    38. Re:Not quite by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      Thank you for thinking of us in our time of need.

  6. Re:firsty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a legitimate illness?

    No!! But I bet John Edwards could get em' a couple million by suing the right people.

  7. Cure? by macpell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems to me six months on duty, away from the Internet, just might be the cure for this terrible illness.

    1. Re:Cure? by Spua7 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sorry I have to fullfill my addiction: You said "Duty"

    2. Re:Cure? by Ziller · · Score: 1

      If it only were so: after the initial month or so, they're usually on leave almost every weekend... unless of course they're FRDF or Special Forces..

      --
      One skilled in battle take a stand in the ground of no defeat, and so does not lose the enemy's defeat.
    3. Re:Cure? by Penguuu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can honestly say it is. I was (and still am, in some way) net-nerd.

      But 6 months in coastal infantry was very good change in life, and in my opinion helped me to gain some experiences i wouldn't otherwise had. And there was those leaves, when we went to city with our friends and got drunk. Helped me to get life of my own, outside of computers.

      So, if there is any young finnish people reading this, i would encourage you to stay in the army, and try to enjoy experiences you can't have, when you are playing counter-strike or hanging in irc.

      --
      The problem in the world today is communication. Too much communication - Homer Simpson
    4. Re:Cure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "when we went to city with our friends and got drunk. Helped me to get life of my own" I realy don't see the connection.

    5. Re:Cure? by festers · · Score: 1

      And there was those leaves, when we went to city with our friends and got drunk. Helped me to get life of my own, outside of computers.

      Nothing like trading a life filled with IRC and Quake for a life filled with bottles of alcohol!

      --


      -------
      "Every artist is a cannibal, every poet is a thief."
    6. Re:Cure? by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking that they don't want their Hotmail accounts (source of porn, perhaps?) to close after that 30 days...

      Or better yet, they just got gmail - and are too busy signing up to have Swedish 16 year olds sent to their emailbox in some vain attempt to use all 1000mb of storage...

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
  8. apply... by dmitrygr · · Score: 2, Funny

    does constantly hitting F5 on slashdot, 24/7 count?

    --
    -------
    1. Enjoy your job
    2. Make lots of money
    3. Work within the law

    Choose any two.
    1. Re:apply... by wizzardme2000 · · Score: 0

      That probably means that you are crazy. If you wanted to do that properly, you'de run Linux (Or BSD or OSX or Cgywin or...) and set up a script to do it for you and then page you the stories. If you are like me, you'de modify the script to automatically make a FP, but it makes your karma go "Bad".

      --

      Toast lands jelly down. If you jelly both sides of a piece of toast, it will hover in a state of quantum indecision.
    2. Re:apply... by daft_one · · Score: 1

      You know... There's a context menu option in Opera that does this for you (timed auto-reload). You should try it, may save wear on the keyboard ;-)

    3. Re:apply... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      does constantly hitting F5 on slashdot,

      F5 doesn't do anything under Mozilla; it only works under.... IE.

      Please return your geek license, cut in two through the magnetic strip, and leave immediately.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:apply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F5 refresh the page just fine in Firefox.

    5. Re:apply... by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      I believe it is you who needs to return your geek license. It works perfectly fine in Moz.

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    6. Re:apply... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      F5 refresh the page just fine in Firefox.

      Mmmm... does that count?- Firefox is still in beta, after all.

      Did I get away with that one, or does F5 work in all the newer versions of Mozilla? The version I'm running (1.0.1) is pretty old now.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:apply... by magefile · · Score: 1

      Firefox isn't beta - it's just pre 1.0. There's a difference. Even if it were beta, it'd be beta the way GoogleNews is beta - in name only.

    8. Re:apply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You demand someone turn cut up and return their geek license when you are running a hideously out of date version of Mozilla? YOU SHOULD TURN IN YOUR GEEK LICENSE!!! GET WITH THE PROGRAM! Get a recent version of Mozilla or Firefox and stop being an asstard.

    9. Re:apply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ctrl+R and F5 both reload/refresh the page..

      Please stop imagining you have a geek license, you are nothing but a stupid wanna-be. Leave immediately.

    10. Re:apply... by Zetra · · Score: 1

      Scary thing is you sound like you have quite alot of experience with that kind of thing =)

    11. Re:apply... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Please stop imagining you have a geek license,

      For all the humor tossed around about geeks, geek does *not* imply talent. Thus, I can be a geek without having any skill.

      you are nothing but a stupid wanna-be.

      You could be right. I couldn't give a flying fuck about Doom 3; I'm running an almost 2-year old PC with the original Intel-845 integrated graphics. Frankly, I don't think I deserve the tag "geek".

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    12. Re:apply... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      YOU SHOULD TURN IN YOUR GEEK LICENSE!!!

      Actually, I forged my geek license. :-P

      Get a recent version of Mozilla or Firefox and stop being an asstard.

      Thanks, having to remember to hit C-r instead of F5 was placing a real strain on my mental skills; I'll definitely upgrade now.

      BTW, re:asstard; I love those insults from the cut-n'-paste school- kind of lame and creative at the same time.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    13. Re:apply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey douche nozzle,

      You rag on someone else and then when everyone points out how fucking wrong and stupid you are, you turn it all around and try and brush off your fucktardness and asstardation!? Man you are a stupid dickless wonder.

      Please go abu graib yourself you stupid sack of shit.

    14. Re:apply... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Lighten up. If you read the original, you'd see I wasn't exactly flame-grilling the person; and generally, in the replies I wasn't trying to make myself out to be King Geek either. Yeah, I was wrong, yeah, I forged my geek license, no, I'm not desparate to upgrade Mozilla (though I'll probably give Firefox a go soon).

      OTOH, your pick-n'-mix obscenities posted as an AC (why was that, anyway?) don't exactly reflect well on you.

      Yeah, I was wrong and I'm a dick. However, you managed to be a dick without even trying; and next time, let's see you leave the 'Post Anonymously' box unchecked, okay?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    15. Re:apply... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Little hint: Don't make snarky comments claiming someone is wrong (whey they are, in fact, right) and people won't get pissed at you.

  9. Net Addiction Gets finnish soldiers out of army by Lobo1 · · Score: 1

    Im not sure if this is real but yea 6 months away would put me into a deep place of almost going insane

    1. Re:Net Addiction Gets Finnish Soldiers Out Of Army by MarkoP · · Score: 1

      Almost true... but... They usually get the classification E, meaning that they'll have to come back to army after two years. To spend some time in the army is mandatory for all finnish males (few exceptions). Time can be something between 6 months and a year, depending on the soldier's rank and education. George W Bush's brave army is based on voluntary. We don't have this kind of "soldier of fortune" -concept based military forces. So, when almost everyone must serve some time in army, you can see unbelieveble losers and retards in Finnish army. :) Usually these people will get the classification E or C. (C means that military duty is over for good). Few links included: Couple of guys serving time: http://www.lmmz.net/files/randompics/sotavaki.jpg Original article in finnish (requires user account): http://www.helsinginsanomat.fi/uutiset/artikkeli/1 076153403162 / Marko P from Finland

    2. Re:Net Addiction Gets Finnish Soldiers Out Of Army by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Apparently you've never met any US military people. There is a pretty high population of losers and retards in our military, too.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    3. Re:Net Addiction Gets Finnish Soldiers Out Of Army by MarkoP · · Score: 1

      You are probably right.

      I have always wondered, what's inside those people's head, when they choose army for their career.

      / Marko P

    4. Re:Net Addiction Gets Finnish Soldiers Out Of Army by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Absolutely nothing is in their head. That's why they decided on a career of killing people instead of college or trade school.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  10. eh.. by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About two years ago I spent 2 months as a counselor at a summer camp, most of which time I had no internet access, and when I did have access it was minimal. I know this is a little pathetic, but I really felt like I was being deprived. I mean, I wasn't sick over it or anything, but it was something I genuinely missed and I was really bothered that I couldn't use it the way I was used to. That said, I don't really think that this is a legitimate sickness worthy of being discharged because of, it's really quite managable. The main way I dealt with it was reading a lot. Generally I don't read that often, but that summer I went through a few tens of books.

    1. Re:eh.. by avij · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A few years ago I was also on a summer camp, I was one of the people looking after the kids that were on that camp. I was perfectly happy for spending some time without internet access, but some of those kids (about age 12) genuinely missed their home PC. I'm used to kids feeling homesick, but back then it was the first time I heard someone miss their computer at home. Oh yes, this happened in Finland. Perhaps some of those children are now those net addicted persons.

      --

      Follow your Euro bills at EBT
    2. Re:eh.. by Jarnis · · Score: 1

      Same thing when I was in a hospital for 2 weeks. Only way I could somehow survive was to read. A LOT. like 7 books in two weeks, which is impressive considering the pain medication I was on early on (pancreatitis. Very very painful stuff...)

    3. Re:eh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Light weight... 7 books should take you 3.5 days.

    4. Re:eh.. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I myself experienced similar feelings of deprivation while traveling in Europe. Of course I had net cafes, but those were few and far between.

      I think the bulk of the anxiety I experienced from this deprivation was due to the fact that when online, I check my news everyday, use up any turns I have in games, check for new anime releases etc. While I'm away, there is a LOT of important news I might be missing, I'm giving up all those turns and falling behind, and I may miss out on anime episodes because it may get licensed or people may stop seeding it. So, I think the anxiety caused by this is pretty valid.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  11. They didnt get out so easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    They don't get pardoned forever. It seems they got 'E' which means 'go home and grow a little'. So they need to come back and do their service 2-3 years later.

    For record you can get 'E' just by requesting it, these guys were forced to 'E' due to addiction =)

    (status of different letters in Finnish Defence Forces:

    A - primary letter given to everyone, capable of active service
    B - Some problem, maybe bad allergy or old injury
    C - No service during peace time
    D - No service (even if it's war time)
    E - Service postponed )

    1. Re:They didnt get out so easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly the reason why those net addicts are send back to home for 2 years is that they are not get used to wake up at 6 AM. Or at least that is what some local papers say...

  12. Re:Viagra Virgo Varoom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm addicted to sex

    How can you tell?

  13. Yep, Finland is an interesting place by TiggertheMad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Recall that about half the country is above the arctic circle, so cell phnes and computers are great when you can hop a reindeer to visit the next village over. They probably have more net addicts than Korea, since the Internet is an easy to stay in contact with people when it's -20 out.

    They also have one of the highest rates of alchoholisim in Europe, and I wonder how many people get waivers for that each year.

    But really, what self-respecting Army would pass on a soldier because he spent too much time practicing his BFG9000 skills...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's +26 out there and I'm reading slashdot in Finland before the USA Today has been printed out.. ;-) It was good to do the 11 months in the army before slashdot was invented..

      Best regards,
      NCO Anonymous Coward, Finnish Reserves

    2. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by ravenlock · · Score: 5, Informative

      We use cell phones more than the internet, at least for now, so keeping in touch really isn't the thing internet is used for (cheap broadband is available in the south, the rest will have to pay their asses off on dialup or expensive broadband.)

      The alcoholism isn't a problem for the military, since the drinking occurs on the soldiers' free time.

      The thing about finnish military service is it's mandatory. If you don't want to do the punishment of 13 months of civil service, it's at least 6 months in the army. If you refuse both, you go to jail. Amnesty considers Finland one of the few countries that take prisoners because of their ideology.

      The way to avoid service is to come up with a reason for them not to want you. The most common would probably be mental illness of sorts. There are countless stories about people doing the weirders stuff to convince their superiors they should be dismissed.

      I think that would explain the net addiction. Somebody came up with a new way to avoid doing their time for another two years.

    3. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by 10Ghz · · Score: 4, Interesting
      But really, what self-respecting Army would pass on a soldier because he spent too much time practicing his BFG9000 skills...


      They did't. Basically, they sent the rookies back home to their mommies in order to grow up. In few years, they will find themselves back in the army. So, being addicted to the net is not a valid excuse to get them out of the service.

      I was excused from the service back in my day, but that was because I got a severe allergic reaction the moment I reported for duty. It was propably the washing-powder (industrial strength) they use to wash the uniforms. Three days in the service, 30 days in the hospital and I was sent back home.

      Speaking as a Finn.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    4. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sorry, I should have been more specific. It's +26 degrees *celcius*, which is approx. +79 degrees in fahrenheit... ;-)

      NCO AC

    5. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Don't give the yankees the conversion into Fahrenheit. How will they ever join the civilised world if they can keep using all of their outdated methods and systems. If you just give Celsius, the yanks might actually be forced learn something for a change.

    6. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the high rates of alcoholism in certain European countries are actually because of genetics. There are certain genetic characteristics which are more or less required in a person for them to easily become an alcoholic. In most European countries, only 5% to 15% of people possess these characteristics. In places with less very-long-term historical contact with alcohol (think Ireland, Russia, Poland and Finland, incidently the countries with reputations for being hard drinkers), that rate goes up to as high as nearly half the population.

      In certain populations (such as native peoples of Canada) with no historical contact with alcohol, the rate of genetic subseptibility goes up to 85%, hence the massive problems they have with boozing.

      And yes, evolutionally, alcoholics wipe themselves out and their genetic characteristics.

    7. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      The way to avoid service is to come up with a reason for them not to want you.

      All this to avoid 6 months of mandatory military service? I can understand if you're a conscientious objector, or if you stand a good chance of being assigned to demining mine fields by hand, but what are they going to do to you in 6 months, aside from spending a chunk of it putting you through basic?

    8. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way to avoid service is to come up with a reason for them not to want you. The most common would probably be mental illness of sorts. There are countless stories about people doing the weirders stuff to convince their superiors they should be dismissed.

      Great, now I have the mental image of a bunch of Finnish "Corporal Klingers!"

    9. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by tmg76 · · Score: 1

      Civilised world? Where's that now when people can move across the borders...?? Just wanted to make sure no smart-ass comes hee-hoing that +26 is below the freezing point or something really funny and interesting. :-)

    10. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by mz2 · · Score: 1

      Lol, your characterization of Finnish transportation system is a bit offending. :) And, as somebody actually already pointed out on this thread, they don't get "passed on", but instead their service is postponed.

      Seriously, though, as funny as this piece of news sounds, it's still quite important in my opinion, as it's showing both that Internet addiction is considered a medical condition, and also that it's considered quite a harsh one.


      mz2
    11. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Dwonis · · Score: 1
      Don't give the yankees the conversion into Fahrenheit. How will they ever join the civilised world if they can keep using all of their outdated methods and systems. If you just give Celsius, the yanks might actually be forced learn something for a change.

      Or, more likely, they'll try to impose their collective will on the rest of us, citing ridiculous statements by their leaders, like, "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."

    12. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!

    13. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by ravenlock · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but to me, at the gentle age of eighteen, it was a big deal that somebody wanted half a year of my life, especially when I believe there's no real need for an army of conscripts in Finland anymore.

      In addition to that, the problem I have with the finnish military is that if you choose civil service, you serve for 13 months, period. It's like a punishment for not being a good boy and doing as was told.

    14. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by klmth · · Score: 1

      It's an attidude thing. Many kids today are just spoiled - they have never had anyone tell them "no" before. The army is their first time they are expected to do something they don't want to.

    15. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Facekhan · · Score: 1

      Americans use the metric system all the time. Its just that we only use it when we are buying and selling drugs. We pretend not to know it mostly because it annoys the French so much. And that is a cause just about everyone can get behind.

      Would you Europeans stop whispering to each other, "maybe next time they will vote for someone else," because at this point I think I can repeat it in about 5 languages.

      We are waiting for you to liberate us. And yes we have weapons of mass destruction.

    16. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > The alcoholism isn't a problem for the military,
      > since the drinking occurs on the soldiers' free
      > time.

      That's pretty funny. You might think so, but the truth is quite different.

      When I was in the Finnish army, conscripts dealing drugs in the garrisons wasn't uncommon in some units. Drunken conscripts on, for example, night guarding duty, were very common. Drunken staff was pretty common too. Drinking & driving through gates with trucks "for fun" and other incidents very not uncommon.

      Alcoholism was a real problem -- among the staff as well as the conscipts.

    17. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by ravenlock · · Score: 1

      I meant for the army, not in the army. Believe me, I'm well acquainted with the finnish drinking habits :P

      What I was aiming at was that the military doesn't really do anything to prevent alcoholism, whereas I believe they enforce a steady zero-tolerance policy for people who do drugs.

    18. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry we, the world community, have decided to take after the Imperial States of America and only bomb the shit out of, er, liberate poor defenceless brown people who are living under a brutal leader that for a long time was supported by an evil corrupt external power.

      Thank you and FUGW.

    19. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well.. in military you are in service _24h_ a day. In civil service you are not, you may even be able to go _home_ after the day's work.

      So, to serve the same total time in hours the civil service will naturally spread over a longer period.

    20. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just wondering, can you keep being sent back home every 3 years when you're required to relist because you never grew up? Or is that a 1 time thing?

    21. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call 13 months in civil service a punishment, let alone crime against humanity. Most of the time it's a 9-17 office job with no danger of someone yelling you to gear up in the middle of night. There's no need to stay in the office building after work - you can just go home without the need of a special permission.

      Besides, no recruit can choose to serve only 6 months, it's up to their superiors to decide.

    22. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I was in jail for 197 days in '02 because I didn't go to the army, but that 6,5 months was like a vacation for me. Evenings and weekends without computers and internet, what a bliss! Of course I could've thought things differently if I hadn't been able to work during the day at my normal job (an IT company) where I could get my daily fix.
      After being an internet user for 15 years it's hard to know if one is really addicted or just used to the easy and convenient way to access information and contact friends and family. Also, having owned a cell phone for 10 years (and now using two) I have no problem using the silent profile and answer the calls on my own sweet time.
      So, do I have a point here? Not really, but I think that those who drop out because of "internet addiction" are wusses who should've chosen another route in the first place. The problem is, that doing the military thing is viewed as a sacred obligation to the WW II veterans and to the country, and the unwashed masses have problems noticing that the times have changed and are constantly changing.

    23. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by BillGodfrey · · Score: 1

      So, being addicted to the net is not a valid excuse to get them out of the service.

      Here's a valid excuse....

      "I don't want to join the army."

    24. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free bullets. Free food. Free lodging. If you get to draw pay, it's even better. After which, you get to go to college, work, etc. You're going to spend 3 months between high school and college doing nothing anyways...

    25. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mandatory service has to be completed by the age of 30. Up to about 25 or so, getting postponement is easy, but after that it gets harder and harder, and postponement is awarded only for an extremely good reason (like health). If you are nearing 30 and haven't served your conscription yet, they won't even issue you with a passport.

    26. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      you have an option of serving unarmed or going to the civil-service. Overwhelming majority choose regural service, though.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    27. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by pasil · · Score: 1

      Amnesty considers Finland one of the few countries that take prisoners because of their ideology.

      Somehow i can't think those "Shitty place"/"Not for me"/"I'm adult, I don't wanna play wargames", opinions as an ideology.

    28. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by ravenlock · · Score: 1

      How about a strong moral conviction that you don't wish to learn how to kill, and as the civil service is twice as long, you feel like you shouldn't have to endure a punishment for said conviction? this is what they are referring to.

    29. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Funny

      I work for a Swedish company, in which I've heard the following joke:

      Q: How do you spot an extroverted Finn?

      A: He looks at your shoes...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    30. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by mehfu · · Score: 1

      Yep!

      Here's my friend's recipe for getting thrown out:

      When in the psychiatrist's office, lie down on the carpet and wrap it around you. Then shout "I AM a spring roll, I AM a spring roll, ..." until your dismissal papers are signed.

      A nice little urban legend, ay?

    31. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're going to bomb Detroit?

    32. Re:Yep, Finland is an interesting place by McCrapDeluxe · · Score: 1

      Is your name derived from the remarkable overclocking opportunities presented by your nation's climate?

  14. The finnish army is obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    It's not a matter of one's choice to "join the army", all the men have to go there.

    The alternatives to that are:
    - 13 months of civil service
    - getting the conscription delayed long enough that you're too old for the army
    - getting a certificate from the doctor that you have a disability that prevents you from going to the army

    1. Re:The finnish army is obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or go to prison for about 6 months. Not that bad of an alternative.

    2. Re:The finnish army is obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or You can do like Jussi Hermaja and flee out of country and seek asylum from belgium. http://www.motherearth.org/hermaja/en/index.php

  15. Not excused by saunabad · · Score: 3, Informative

    But delayed and told to come back later after couple of years. At least according to the local Finnish media.

    (Totally crazy anyway. This is Finland for heavens sake, not some pansy-ass Sweden ;)

  16. why don't they just come out and say it by ElliotLee · · Score: 1

    it's *slashdot* addiction - no way around it

  17. WTF? by saden1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Put them in a treatment program. Don't just let them go back and their computer.

    --

    -----
    One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    1. Re:WTF? by Aviancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some might argue that military service IS a treatment program of sorts...

    2. Re:WTF? by Zone-MR · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The question is, should this 'addiction' be treated in the first place?

      On one hand I think claiming to be 'internet addicted' to the extent that you cannot cope without the internet is a joke.

      On the other I would consider myself to have a dependancy on the internet which could be classed as a mild addiction - I begin to feel like a part of me is missing when I need to spend a prolonged time away from the Internet.

      I imagine the main reason I am so dependant on the Internet is convenient access to informaion. If I stumble accross anything I don't understand, or something I would like to know more about, I can obtain a wealth of information and endless user opinions after a few google queries.

      When I am at a computer, I almost consider it to be an extension of my brain. Whilst my own brain keeps a record of personal memories and knowledge, the Internet lets me augment my own experiences and knowledge with that of other people.

      Spending most of my life with access to the internet at my fingertips, I have got used to (and to a certain extend dependant on) the ability to instantly recall any phone number someone gave me 12 years ago. Or the ability to consult thousands of experts in any specialised field and receive a response within a few seconds. Or the ability to instantly share my experiences and discoveries with others who may find it interesting/useful. When that access isn't possible, is it that surprising that I feel as if something is missing?

      Is thirst for knowledge really an addiction that should be treated like a mental illness and cured?

    3. Re:WTF? by arose · · Score: 1

      Yes, the "free internet accsess" treatment...

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    4. Re:WTF? by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      Anyone remember the old SF stories where people were wired into a net (exact details not specified, but usually something wired directly to the brain), with instant info retrieval wherever they happened to be?

      The internet is the closest thing we have to that futuristic setup. With a 'net connection, a mouse and a keyboard I can find out literally anything, within seconds. Although I occasionally use the net for entertainment, most of the time I'm soaking up news, opinion, facts, etc. (Ok, so that IS a form of entertainment...)

      Strip that away for a couple of days and it's no wonder people feel cut off. Suddenly you have to rely on memory for everything, and it's possible (gasp) that you can't immediately satisfy your curiousity on something by visiting Google.

      Anyway, apart from that I run a software web site with my own apps. One of the apps is for sale, all the others are freeware. Orders come in by email and customer queries have to be answered - basically tying me to the PC most days. Yes, I would suffer badly if I had to spend more than half a day offline without a LOT of advance warning.

    5. Re:WTF? by rofa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In one of the local neswpapers is a story about this, it say that the biggest reason is the very different life-rhytm. It's about a marginal group of yong men who havn't had anyone controlling their habits, they haven't been woken up at 6:00 and nobody has ordered them to do anything, they have been living without any limitations. When suddenly all this is true, they can't handle it. Net addiction is not a disease as such, but the other symptoms are, and they vary; panic disturbances, pressure handling problems and other psychological factors. These guys only have online friends and suddenly living in the same room with 10 other farting people is too much for them.

      They go on to say that these people are examined later (1-3 years), and that most of them are rid of the addicion at that point and then they can continue their service. About 80% finish their military service.

      -- [Partly (shamelessly) quoted and freely translated from "Iltalehti" http://www.iltalehti.fi ]

      --
      No sig. Go away.
    6. Re:WTF? by be951 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Is thirst for knowledge really an addiction that should be treated like a mental illness and cured?
      Do you really think people claiming "internet addiction" are doing research and trying to learn useful knowledge? I would wager that nearly all "internet addicts" spend virtually all their online time in a small set of activities such as: chat, "adult" content, and gambling. There are probably also subsets that are "addicted" to ebay, games (the term "EverCrack" comes to mind), and a few other areas.

      A sibling post describing the issue in more detail makes it sound like "internet addiction" is mainly a euphemism for "lazy, undisciplined and poorly socialized".

    7. Re:WTF? by Fishstick · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, really. At one point in my life I was 'addicted' to sleeping past noon and staying out all night having fun. Then I graduated and got a job. I had to go cold turkey -- man that was a bitch.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    8. Re:WTF? by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1
      The military has long been a treatment programs for such disorders as:
      • having knocked a girl up,
      • got caught stealing a car,
      • can't find a job,
      • belong to wrong demographic and there's a draft going on,
      And various other disorders whose best cure is to very quickly leave town or, for preference, the whole country.

      I'll admit that Internet addiction is a new one on me---it won't get me out of doing the dishes, let alone fighting for my country, and my country's being pretty militarily, ehrm, "enthusiastic" these days.

      But treatment programs along the lines of "If you keep fucking up we'll have you shot with this gun right here" often have remarkable results.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    9. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most (european?) countries, you can't force someone into a treatment program, unless they did something illegal. And an addiction in itself is not illegal (although the substance may be, but I don't even think heroin addicts can be forced into treatment unless they did a violent crime).

    10. Re:WTF? by nadadogg · · Score: 1

      I hear ya dude, that shit sucked. I went from staying up all night playing everquest and picking up local sluts on MSN/yahoo/AIM to having a damn real job where I wasn't the night shift front desk guy.

      --
      i use linux and windows oh god how can i have an opinion
    11. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One the one hand I agree with you. On the other hand, wait, I only can use one hand when on the net surfing pr0n!

    12. Re:WTF? by Nutria · · Score: 1

      It's about a marginal group of yong men who havn't had anyone controlling their habits, they haven't been woken up at 6:00 and nobody has ordered them to do anything, they have been living without any limitations.

      It's called "bad parents".

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    13. Re:WTF? by ExistentialFeline · · Score: 1

      People can form an addiction to probably pretty much bloody anything that has some sort of short-term gratification. I've seen ebay addiction and it isn't pretty. I can attest to people accumulating thousands of dollars of debt.

    14. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hay guys, it hasn't happened to me so it can't happen at all, am i rite?

    15. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And do you think that excuses them from their civic duties?

    16. Re:WTF? by Daneurysm · · Score: 1

      Moderation be damned...and my keyboard is broken, so pardon some repacements.

      I am no\/\/ 25 years old, I have been 'online' since the age eleven, and on the internet (via a shell account I 'discovered' from a then local university...and then the first-run commercial nets of the time...delphi, bi\net, later compuserv and then aol even for a time).

      I have gro\/\/n highly dependant on instant access to the ans\/\/ers to \/\/hatever absurd question happens to captivate my mind at the moment.

      Every day I do a fair amount of reseach on many fields. My mind, no\/\/ very much a reflection of the internet, has varied and random islands of information...over time all of \/\/hich slo\/\/ly become integrated, linked and/or conte\tually relevant. sometimes it's absolutely esoteric information the likes of \/\/hich \/\/ould probably never be useful to me...other times it's related to either of my chosen trades. (no\/\ Audio Production and screen printing...used to have computers/net\/\/orking too for almost 10 years).

      Granted, I don't kno\/\/ ho\/\/ entirely addicted I am so much as "practically dependant". \/\/hen I do go for unplanned stretches \/\/ith no internet, I dunno, I usually feel just fine...though, \/\/hen I do get back to it I feel much better--especially after i check my email.

      Internet Addiction? I dunno I don't care. For me? For them? I don't care. I've gotten a far many more vices of considerably less value.

      But, please don't claim the the vast majority must obviously be spending all of their time consumed by frivolity, triviality and minutae.

    17. Re:WTF? by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      I think your keyboard is causing your addiction - it must take you ages to type the 'www' part whenever you want to visit a website :-)

    18. Re:WTF? by be951 · · Score: 1
      [w]ith no internet, I dunno, I usually feel just fine...

      Doesn't sound like someone claiming to be addicted. Keep in mind addict != heavy user. I don't claim to have done extensive research on "internet addiction", but I've heard about a fair number of cases and all have been centered around one or more of the "frivolities" I mentioned, thus my assessment. YMMV.

    19. Re:WTF? by syukton · · Score: 1

      Who defines "useful knowledge" ... you? god? the president? I can't believe you got modded insightful after saying something like that. I might read about gardening online and you might read about cars, and we both might believe that the other is wasting the resources of the internet, but that doesn't make either of us right.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    20. Re:WTF? by be951 · · Score: 1
      Who defines "useful knowledge" ... you? god? the president?

      "Useful", though somewhat subjective, is a well defined term. Since you seem rather confused about my meaning, despite adequate context, I'll reiterate a few of the major time wasters on the internet that fall outside "pursuit of useful knowledge". Keep in mind this is not an exhaustive list and there may be exceptions that do involve seeking "useful knowledge": chat, p0rn, gambling, games, some shopping/ebay.

      I might read about gardening online and you might read about cars, and we both might believe that the other is wasting the resources of the internet....

      You appear to be confusing "useful" and "interesting"; or perhaps useful to an individual vs. useful in a general sense.

  18. Ill take that as a no... by Sibshops · · Score: 0

    casue there were no replies.

    1. Re:Ill take that as a no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll? But it's true.

      5. PzBtl 403 to be precise.

    2. Re:Ill take that as a no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same as my great grandad (died in russia front) and my grandad who only lost an arm, plus his brother who was in an american deathcamp (something the history books dont tell you about ;) )

  19. Oh hush by sim000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is ridiculous. Unfortunately, the story is true. What's ridiculous is that the service doesn't mean 6 months of no net -- it just means you can't get on the net _as much as you might want to_. First, the Finnish army gives you three out of four weekends off, which means you get to go home (=on the net if you just have to get your fix) for the weekend and report back on Sunday evening. Second, most if not all garrisons have computers with Internet-connections that the conscripts can freely use during the evenings. And if you still can't handle it? Growing up is exactly what you need.

    1. Re:Oh hush by klmth · · Score: 5, Informative

      People drop out of the military for many reasons. Most people can't cope with the sense of authority that the army instills. All of these are sent home to grow up for a couple of years - net addiction is not an excuse, it just means that you're psychologically unfit at the moment.

    2. Re:Oh hush by sim000 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's certainly true. I didn't mean to be "pro-army" in any way -- the army, IMO, it's one of the most useless money-sucking institutions ever invented.

      Modern medicine is so advanced that there are no healthy people anymore

    3. Re:Oh hush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll give you the money-sucking... but _useless_?

    4. Re:Oh hush by Teun · · Score: 1
      Rediculous or not, fact is that with 2 generations of peace in the area and the big bad Soviet Bear dead Finland is not in need of a large standing army.
      This is no different than in other Western European countries except many of them have scrapped conscription for this reason.
      To have soldiers trained for less than 12-18 months does not give you a very good army to begin with.
      When I was drafted (in The Netherlands) in the early 70's and with the cold war still going on only 3 out of 10 drafted were actually signed up. Al kinds of excuses were given to send someone home, only the most suited (No, not the best :)) were kept to be trained as solder.

      Presently even less conscripts are needed so the Finns have gone the way (like for example the Germans) of decreasing the service period below what is actually usefull from a military standpoint and they are still looking for excuses to send people home!

      Yet the infliction is real, we all know of companies end institutions blocking port 80 and of people having been fired for internet abuse in the boss's time.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    5. Re:Oh hush by sim000 · · Score: 1
      That was more of an ideological comment on the lines of wishing-it-was-a-perfect-world..

      In the current not-so-perfect world, however, I grant that most armies have a sort of an evil kind of balancing effect on the state of the world. Of course, some go fight rampantly around the planet in a vain attempt to accomplish some obscure goals, but that's different story :)

      In the interests of sticking to the topic, let's drop this subject here.

    6. Re:Oh hush by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It does seem to have less of a point what with NATO and all, but then again, the security of your nation isn't something you want to solely trust to others. Espically if all of Europe took that view and the US became the only NATO member with any military power to speak of. Would you REALLY want to rely on America as the sole source of your secrity if, say, the Norwegians got mad about one too many Viking jokes and decided to invade?

      Ok, ok, I know it's not real likely to happen, but do recall that there was a mand only around 50 years ago that was hell bent on conquering the entirety of Europe, and I seem to recall in 1939 Russia invaded Finland, and Finland won much to the supprise of most of the world. I'm just saying it's not an all bad idea to have your own army.

    7. Re:Oh hush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      in 1939 Russia invaded Finland, and Finland won much to the supprise of most of the world.


      Yes, I'd be surprised, as Finland actually lost and gave up the areas Stalin had demanded. They fought surprisingly well but I wouldn't consider it a victory. And neither did the fins, which is why they joined Hitler in attacking the Soviet Union in '41. And lost again. /short history lesson concluded

    8. Re:Oh hush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you compare Finland to any of the Eastern Bloc countries, I'd say it was no bad defeat either...

    9. Re:Oh hush by zambotsu · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'd be surprised, as Finland actually lost and gave up the areas Stalin had demanded.

      Take a look what Stalin did to the Baltic countries. I would say Finns lost the battle but won the war since it was a fight for survival. Some land was lost but Finland as we know it survived, that sounds like a victory to me.

      But in strict military terms, Finland did indeed surrender to the Soviet Union.

    10. Re:Oh hush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kinda disagree with the term "surrender".

      If Finland had surrendered, the fate of Finland would have been similar to the east block countries.

      One month before cease fire Soviet Union demanded surrender, but after soviet advance was halted a compromise deal was negotiated.

      All countries that surrendered to soviets were occupied, Finland was not.

    11. Re:Oh hush by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Sense of authority? Over who? Civilians? Don't soldiers know they're public servants, not overlords? :) I know if you give a gun to an American they think they're John Wayne/Rambo/Whoever, but not Finns, surely? :) Can I phrase this entire post in questions? No.

    12. Re:Oh hush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is ridiculous. Unfortunately, the story is true. What's ridiculous is that the service doesn't mean 6 months of no net -- it just means you can't get on the net _as much as you might want to_. First, the Finnish army gives you three out of four weekends off, which means you get to go home (=on the net if you just have to get your fix) for the weekend and report back on Sunday evening.

      Not really. It depends on your service time and the place you are sent to. During the first couple weeks you get NO time off, and in some cases are not allowed even to leave barracks. Why? To weed out all the people who couldn't make it in the army anyway. After that you get more holidays, sure, but for an 'addict' the first two weeks can be a real bitch.

      And you don't have spare time, if you're camping in the middle of nowhere and 20 km to the nearest town. You are glad, if you can get your cell phone to work. And you don't play CS or War3 with your cell phone.

      Second, most if not all garrisons have computers with Internet-connections that the conscripts can freely use during the evenings. And if you still can't handle it? Growing up is exactly what you need.

      What? Are you really Finnish? First of all, Finnish military code prohibits any computer in the barracks that is in military use to be connected to the internet. When I did my military service in 2000, there was only one machine connected to the internet, and it was at the HQ, and there is no way you could use it.

      There is, however , free Christian organization selling cheap jelly doughnuts and soda for soldiers. They have a place called sotilaskoti in just about every garrison. They do have a "surf the internet" in their pages, so I guess there are some web-connected machines there now, but they are based on voluntary work, nothing to do with actual army stuff.

    13. Re:Oh hush by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      the army, IMO, it's one of the most useless money-sucking institutions ever invented.

      Everybody says that until they need soldiers to die for them.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    14. Re:Oh hush by ratamacue · · Score: 1

      Funny you refer to those who refuse this form of slavery (conscription) as "phychologically unfit" and needing to "grow up". The way I see it, the people that need to grow up are those who readily accept the idea that government owns your body and the fruits of your labor, and has the "right" to force people into labor against their will.

      Human beings are unique, thinking individuals. We are not cows waiting to be milked and herded into conformity. We are not the borg.

    15. Re:Oh hush by Merk · · Score: 1

      Everybody says that until they need soldiers to die for them.

      Soldiers always say that, not realizing that most people don't want them to die, especially not for the cause their government has chosen.

    16. Re:Oh hush by klmth · · Score: 1

      In Finland, you can civil service over the military. I wasn't referring to those that quit due to net addiction as loonies. They are psychologically unfit *to serve* at that very moment due to their addiction.

    17. Re:Oh hush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (WWII) "as Finland actually lost and gave up the areas Stalin had demanded"

      This is typical misunderstanding, Finland gave up areas and the terms of the peace treaty were harsh. However, Stalin wanted to invade the country. He was not successfull. So, his goal was not met and ours (to remain an independent country) was met.

      Of all the countries that were involved in WWII action, Helsinki and London are the only capitals that were not invaded by foreign troups at any stage of the war. Other 'winners', like France, can not say that.

    18. Re:Oh hush by ratamacue · · Score: 1
      you can civil service over the military

      Yes, but what's the difference? Either you work at the threat of violence or you work at your own will. (There are exactly two possible modes of human interaction: voluntary association, and force.) Government operates on the principle of force, not voluntary association.

    19. Re:Oh hush by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Of all the countries that were involved in WWII action, Helsinki and London are the only capitals that were not invaded by foreign troups at any stage of the war

      You missed Canberra and Washington, D.C.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    20. Re:Oh hush by Zak3056 · · Score: 1

      Soldiers always say that, not realizing that most people don't want them to die, especially not for the cause their government has chosen.

      I'm not a soldier, though I have quite a few friends who are or were. I also did not suggest that people WANTED soldiers to die, nor that all wars had the support of the populace.

      But in regards to the grandparent's assertation (that armies were a useless waste of money) I would note that when an unfriendly power knocks on the door, the only thing standing between freedom and being conquered is that useless waste of money. At that point, the screaming begins about how $POLITICAL_PARTY wasn't spending enough on the army.

      I stand by my assertation.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    21. Re:Oh hush by Tonytheloony · · Score: 1

      You just forgot to mention that Finland actually joined with the nazis until 1944. And like someone else replied, you forgot Washington and Canberra.

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    22. Re:Oh hush by CyborgT · · Score: 1

      He meant "only capitals in Europe", as the legend officially goes. There were so many countries in WWII action, that if you would really count all, you would get also more other capitals than just Canberra and Washington D.C. in addition to Helsinki and London.

  20. Good news! I have a disability! by syousef · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sure this does mean I get to sue the arse off my boss if I'm fired for inappropriate use of company resources when I'm caught surfing pr0n at work, right? I mean he's discriminating against my disability! Shame on him!

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Good news! I have a disability! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, an addiction to pr0n and to the internet... I wonder if those go hand in hand.

    2. Re:Good news! I have a disability! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      naw, if you're addicted to pr0n then you only have one free hand

    3. Re:Good news! I have a disability! by sigh71 · · Score: 1
  21. I sure know Internet chess is addictive. by Wargames · · Score: 1

    http://www.geocities.com/icaddict.geo/ (The Internet Chess Addict's Home).

    --
    -- Each tock of the Planck clock is a new world and here we are still life. --
  22. Addiction problems by The_Mystic_For_Real · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can identify with these soldiers. I once spent a month at a house with no internet access whatsoever. I had no idea what to do with myself in my spare time. I had my laptop with me and spent hours playing solitaire. I couldn't get my mind off the internet, and what must be happenning in my absence. I tried watching tv but I usually watch tv while browsing /., so it was no help. News papers weren't much better because I couldn't adjust the font size or get the perfect lighting of the computer monitor. I even went through pages I had available offline. I ended up just signing up for a month of dial-up connection, but it possibly made it worse because I had an old modem and was used to broadband. I had exactly the same sensations that I had while trying to give up cocaine (a habit from my young and stupid days), except there was no real physical sensations except those produced from nervousness.

    --

    _____

    Thank you.

    1. Re:Addiction problems by used_rugs · · Score: 1
      I agree completely.

      This is a serious issue. The difference between an alcoholic and a regular drinker is that the alcoholic MUST have a drink when they wake up.

      Now lets have a show of hands for how many resident dotters check their internet before taking a piss?

      I rest my case.
      (mod parent up!)

    2. Re:Addiction problems by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I think internet addiction is really an extremely low tolerance for being bored.

      I've had the internet since 92 or 93, and before that Compuserve, and before that BBS's, and with each service came an increasing ability to *ALWAYS* be able to find something to entertain myself. If its reading an article, learning a new programming language, a piece of software to play with. That was 5 years ago.

      Now with mp3s, and bit torrent, the entire world of music, film, and television are avaliable online and I have no tolerance for being presented with entertainment a television network or someone else thinks I might want to see. I want to assemble my own entertainment, I watch/read/play what I want to, when I want to, on my schedule.

      After a few years of this, I just have no patience.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    3. Re:Addiction problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a pc installed in my bathroom so I could piss and check my email at the same time, does that count?

    4. Re:Addiction problems by arose · · Score: 1
      I think internet addiction is really an extremely low tolerance for being bored.
      Yes. The grandparent post describes how I felt before having 24/7 internet connection.
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    5. Re:Addiction problems by DaGoaty · · Score: 1

      Why should you need a tolerance for being bored? Surely internet addiction is just a display of lack of imagination when it comes to thinking of something to do 'offline' (e.g. make "real-life" friends!)

    6. Re:Addiction problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to assemble my own entertainment, I watch/read/play what I want to, when I want to, on my schedule.

      So TV's a small problem. Other than that, can't you watch any DVD, read any book, listen to any CD, or play any offline game you want? You really don't know what to do without the internet, do you? Sounds like a problem to me.

    7. Re:Addiction problems by syukton · · Score: 1

      extremely well-put. Internet Addiction is just an extremely strong case of anti-boredom.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
  23. Not a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story is not a joke, but Finnish Army is. (I'm a Finn, so I'm allowed to say that...) :)

    I mean that the military service is only 6 months, you can spend most of the weekends at home, you can bring your own mobile phone there (and use it to IRC/chat/surf/whatever), you can use the computers at the canteen and so -- still some kiddies suffer from Internet addiction.

    What the **** we are going to do when the Russians come? :)

    1. Re:Not a joke by ravenlock · · Score: 1

      Um, let's see -- point at them and laugh?

    2. Re:Not a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      What the **** we are going to do when the Russians come? :)

      Try to look like we're enjoying it so we dont have to do another take.

    3. Re:Not a joke by jaakkeli · · Score: 1
      I mean that the military service is only 6 months, you can spend most of the weekends at home, you can bring your own mobile phone there (and use it to IRC/chat/surf/whatever), you can use the computers at the canteen and so -- still some kiddies suffer from Internet addiction.

      What the **** we are going to do when the Russians come? :)

      We'll offer them some coffee, let them play Tetris on our mobile phones and stick a 20 euro bill in their pockets if they promise to go home.

      I mean, 20 euros ought to be enough for any Russian soldier...

    4. Re:Not a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll offer them some coffee, let them play Tetris on our mobile phones and stick a 20 euro bill in their pockets if they promise to go home.

      You don't watch the news? Don't you know that Finland is in terrible financial problems now the alcohol tax was lowered and the government is losing hundreds of millions euros annually.

  24. You have no clue! by aralin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man, if you could stay 2 months without net, you have no freakin' idea what you are talking about. No clue! Eight years ago I was supposed to spend two weeks without net with friends at a lake. Your typical summer holidays. I made it one week before hitchhiking over 600 miles back to "civilization". And that was 8 years ago. I know people who lost big bet that they could stay *one day* without cell phone. A "disconnect" is a serious problem for growing segment of population and net addiction is a real thing(tm).

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    1. Re:You have no clue! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny
      Jesus...

      We take .75 Million years to move from the open veldt, to skin tents, mud-thatch huts, and finally stucco condos with AC.

      Who are these wiseacres who want to ignore this struggle, and revisit the "great" outdoors? Why don't y'all starve a bear, and stay in here - where the lights are on? There's a Red Bull in the 'fridge!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:You have no clue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe some of us are tired of dealing the supposedly civilised "animals" in the city. You know the ones that look like walking billboard advertisment and try to murder people with their shitty ass driving skills.

    3. Re:You have no clue! by Epistax · · Score: 1

      ...but if we go back to the veldt we can live with the animals and gain their powers...

      </OMG>

    4. Re:You have no clue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Gau was the only one that could do that. Apparently you have to have grown up in the veldt... :-) Ah, FF6.

    5. Re:You have no clue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, the way you write/speak English, I would guess you are Russian or some other slavic country. Am I close?

    6. Re:You have no clue! by Feanturi · · Score: 1

      Back when I got on the net in 1990, I was addicted to MUDs. I'd been phreaking before finding the internet, and it was kind of a relief to be able to go around the world without it being illegal at the same time. About a month went by, and I was firmly addicted. But then some guys abused the little-known gateway we were using and it got locked down. I felt I had no choice, went back to scanning other networks for outdials in other cities where I would eventually find another open gateway (MIT) and from that point forward about a year I was using the net and phreaking at the same time, but I didn't care anymore, I had my 16 hour days on the net back.

      Nowadays I don't care quite as much, but it's still like part of my body or something.

    7. Re:You have no clue! by PsychoFurryEwok · · Score: 1

      I brought my laptop to summer camp with a list of free dial-ups in the area. I broke the lock off their phone box, ripped the end off the phone cord, wrapped it on...dial-tone. :) It was so old school, I loved it.

    8. Re:You have no clue! by joggle · · Score: 1

      There wasn't really a 'net' back then, was there? Were you addicted to usenet, irc or some bbs? At the time I tried logging on to a local BBS and was bored stiff, so went back to playing Quake or Sim City 2000.

    9. Re:You have no clue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't have sex, for it only leads to kissing, and before you know it you have to start talking to them.

      That's the most retarded thing I've read all month, which is fortunate for you because the month's just getting started. Get a fucking life.

    10. Re:You have no clue! by aralin · · Score: 1

      Universities had pretty good connection even back then. By "civilization" I, of course, meant the university computer lab, where I was a sysadmin at the time. :)

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
    11. Re:You have no clue! by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      I agree. It's not Funny. Pretty Seriously people do have internet addiction problems.
      I Do.
      I had to travel once to a village to meet my old relatives, and it was a village with only a few telephones (no mobile access) and absolutely no internet (they have heard of it.. but never seen). I stayed there for 3 FULL days before escaping to civilization and checking my mail and /.
      All 3 days it was like a big withdrawal syndrome.
      I waited for the newspaper truck at 4.00 am at the shop every day to check on the news. The truck driver was amazed to see me so early up for newspaper (remember that was a village where people got up at 5 am to goto the fields.) It was real horrible sensation not knowing anything about the world in realtime man.!
      Anyway i literally escaped from that place when i couldn;t bear it any longer. Man it was a joy to be back in the Info-World.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  25. Don't read anything into it by hyfe · · Score: 1

    Atleast here in Norway (we have 12 months compulsary service), they have a tendency to decide who they want or doesn't want first, and if they want to get rid of you they'll accept next to any reasoning.

    My drafting was one of the few times in life i wish were fat, frail or had any disabilities :)

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    1. Re:Don't read anything into it by tuxette · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have several friends here in Norway who were rejected by the military after their first meeting for compulsory service because they were deemed "too intelligent" to be worthy of service ;-)

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    2. Re:Don't read anything into it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, riiigght...
      Thats what they said.

      They prob. failed on the physics or/and psycho tests...

  26. Finnish army needs no nerds like those sent home by CarlLaban · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a Finnish citizen I am very happy that our army sends these sissies home to grow up and is not trying to adjust the service easier for them. Our army is for self defence (not attacking poor people for some ;-) reason) and we really need good men (and women) to do the job.

  27. URL for Internet Addicts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh?

  28. Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet ;-) by hadesan · · Score: 4, Informative
    Guess they gave the Ruskies a run for their money in WWII. Especially decent considering the odds they were against.
    http://reference.allrefer.com/encyclopedia/F/Finni shR.html/

    However, with this bullshit, you wonder how they would fair now...

  29. grow up? by urbaer · · Score: 1

    What's the point of doing service if it doesn't make you grow up? Actually, what does the Finnish army do?

    1. Re:grow up? by sopuli · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The purpose of the Finnish army is to defend Finland. It's purpose is not to psychologically damage its recruits.

    2. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Technically it's defence forces, not army. We dont attack other countries=)

      And about growing up...well it's sorta mean to say "grow up" and many use it to finish their studies. Doctors have very easy time in service, as do priests etc.

      Probably in this case they were sent home to get rid of their addiction.

    3. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the point of doing service if it doesn't make you grow up?

      It's scary to think that people like you are out there living in make believe land. Armies are not and never have been about making people grow up. It's about having a force ready to do the killing if killing becomes a necessity.

    4. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't count on that. Besides, most recruits are already psychologically damaged to begin with ;)

    5. Re:grow up? by InfiniteZero · · Score: 1, Insightful
      The purpose of the Finnish army is to defend Finland.
      Against what? An invasion of SCO lawyers? MS zombies?
    6. Re:grow up? by urbaer · · Score: 1

      wtf!

      Hey, I don't think that armies do make you grow up. Living for a certain amount of time makes you grow up. It's just that all the people I talk to who are forced to do national service always tell me this is the reason why they are made to do join. In fact I believe that armies increase your chances of not growing up (erm... by dying).

      I live in Australia where we don't have to join the army (unless conscription is brought back... although we do have work for the dole). Many of us protest war and my point is "Why make people join the army (especially during peace time)"? I can't actually see any reason personally. I can't see that anyone has any ill towards Finland (or is there)?

    7. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that military service is mandatory for everybody in Finland?

      Oh, yeah. I get your point. :-)

    8. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you know nothing of geography. Would you live next to Russia(Whom we have fought before) without some sort of protection?

    9. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      when it comes to military and army, finns still live 30's. it's almost a crime to say a negative word about army in finland and finns haven't never been honest with their ww2.

      it's funny when finns are like "we are the only one who have ever been able to stop the attack of super power". i think they haven't never heard about vietnam. finnish army is nowadays for patriots, who want to scare finns with the "big bad russian folks behind the border". only scenario where i could see use of finnish army is against domestic rebellion. i don't see there's any possible outside threat to finland.

      army of finland is the same kind of crap that every other state army in the world.

    10. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Imperial States of America once it runs out of brown people to use as target practice?

    11. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Against Russia. Those peaceful neighbours have attacked Finland for 20+ times during the past few hundred years. If we were under Russian occupation today, the situation of Finnish people would be much like Chechnya. Just look there to see how the great Russian bear handles with its minorities. Thus, the purpose of Finnish defense forces is to be strong enough to discourage them from attacking us again.

      These realities also explain the common attitude referenced in TFA. Finnish military wants and needs everyone, so service is compulsory. However, military doesn't need or want those who either don't like guns or aren't able to fight reliably. For the first there's non-military service, for the second the C and D classes (unable to serve) and the E class that's relevant here (the "go home and grow up" method). In countries where military service isn't compulsory, these guys with serious net addiction wouldn't probably even try to join the army.

    12. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have condoms for protection while making sweet love down by the fire with those hot russian mail order brides.

    13. Re:grow up? by jorleif · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I did the service we were told to protect against "the Enemy".

      When asked to elaborate the officer said something like: "Well, we are not allowed to say who the enemy is, but we can say this much: It's not the Swedes"

      I guess it's between Norway and Russia then, even though I find the two scenarios you presented more likely to occur :)

    14. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the yankee imperialist bastards... They will fuck over your government and country in the name of protecting you from communism.

    15. Re:grow up? by 10Ghz · · Score: 0
      when it comes to military and army, finns still live 30's. it's almost a crime to say a negative word about army in finland and finns haven't never been honest with their ww2.


      either you are not a Finn, or you live in a barrel in a middle of the forest. There is ACTIVE discussion about the military going on all the time! Should we join the NATO or not? Should we ratify the Ottawa treaty? Should we move from conscript-military to professional military? How long should the guys doing civil-service serve?

      it's funny when finns are like "we are the only one who have ever been able to stop the attack of super power"


      Close but no cigar. What is said is that "Finnish Army was the only army in the WW2 that was able to stop Red Armys strategic offensive" and "Finland was the only country in WW2 that sided with Germany and was NOT occupied by a foreign power". And you know what? Both comments are 100% true! Read some military-history before displaying your ignorance!

      finnish army is nowadays for patriots, who want to scare finns with the "big bad russian folks behind the border".


      Considering that overwhelming majority still serve in the military, it seems that this country is full of patriots, and weasels such as yourself are in the minority.

      And besides, there ARE "big bad Russian folks behind the border". For as long as Finns have lived here, the enemy has always been in the east. And Russia has LOTS of military-hardware parked right across the Finnish-Russian border!

      only scenario where i could see use of finnish army is against domestic rebellion. i don't see there's any possible outside threat to finland.


      uh-huh. I bet people thought exactly like that in 1938. And look what happened.

      army of finland is the same kind of crap that every other state army in the world.


      I have two proverbs for you that seem fitting:

      "There will always be an army inside the country. Either yours or someone elses."

      "Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't"
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    16. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purpose of the Finnish Army is to distribute armysh, the Finnish version of mudsh, which was featured on SlashDot.Org, translated into Finnish and posted on the Finnish Army website for recruitment.

      If the Finnish Army is exempting net addicted recruits then they only have themselves to blame for encouraging such addiction.

      - Dean Swift, author of mudsh

    17. Re:grow up? by rraton · · Score: 1

      > "There will always be an army inside the country. Either yours or someone elses."

      > "Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who don't"

      I am just reading a book titled 'Selfish Genes'. It is a book about darwinism (Evolution), and I just read a chapter about unselfishess. It was quite interesting (the hole book is), and used wars an example about human solidarity, the prisinors dilemma. It was quite interesting, it goes like this (simplified version shown at the book):

      You have 2 cards, "give up" and "co-operate", and you play against another person, who has also the same cards. You show one of your cards and the scores goes like this:

      co-operate + co-operate = 3 points to each
      give-up + give-up = 1 point each
      co-operate + give-up = 0 points from co-operation and 5 points to the betrayer (give-up)

      The amount of points is not important, but the relation between them. The only reasonable tactic when playing only one game, is to play give-up. Though both of you could get more points if playing co-op, but what if the another one is playing a bad guy?

      Okey, the best tactic was to play give-up, because if the another played give-up when you played co-op, wou would lose big time.. The thing changes when there are n-games to play (iterative prisinors dilemma), and neither of you don't know how many games there are. This is what the army-comparison is all about. When you're in a field, say 50m far from the 'enemy', you might be thinking the prisinors dilemma. You know, that if both of you rush up to the field with guns firing, both you and the enemy will be killed (not much survivors), so that's the give-up + give-up strategy. But, if you play co-op + co-op both, you both will survive, and I don't think a great majority of people wants to be killed in a battle field.. (I might be wrong here) You propably might guess the another situation when the other gets killed because the otherone cheated.. That's why it's so easy to play give-up.

      What I am saying here, there are a LOT'S of reasons to build solidarity between 'enemy' forces. And those quotes you gave have been proven to be false by biology researches based on evolution(ism). Or there are discussions to be taken from the matter. Things are not that simple.

      Did I make any sense? Probaply not. Read the book, it's a great book: "Selfish genes", or in finnish "Itsekkäät geenit".

    18. Re:grow up? by jorleif · · Score: 1

      Or more likely, terrorism

    19. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we (Sweden) did include Finland in its territory back in the day... Maybe we're planning a comeback! Be very afraid of the giant Swedish army... indeed, all three soldiers are highly trained. Oh and it could be any country, really, doesn't have to be a country bordering Finland.

    20. Re:grow up? by jorleif · · Score: 1

      Yes, there's a finnish movie about Finland attacking Luxemburg...

    21. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we bad bad Russian folks are gonna invade you for your vodka - you bastards have no excuse to make it better then ours =)

    22. Re:grow up? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Little boys in their late teens who can't, just can't, give up their on-line porn for a short while are alreadly psychologically damaged.

      Guess what the cure for such addictions is, hmmm?

      Deprivation of the addicting substance.

    23. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The purpose of the Finnish army is to defend Finland.


      From what?


      A bunch of guys armed with Swiss Army Knives?!?!?!?!?!

    24. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are partially right, Finland doesn't really have any enemies. But the problem is that we are in the middle, between Russia and the rest of the western countries, so that whenever Russia feels the need to secure it's western border against someone else, we're in trouble.

    25. Re:grow up? by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      When asked to elaborate the officer said something like: "Well, we are not allowed to say who the enemy is, but we can say this much: It's not the Swedes"

      I wonder if that counts us Swedish-Americans, too...

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    26. Re:grow up? by sopuli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is not the army's task to straighten these boys out. You should not focus on the internet addiction part, that is only one symptom of many. I suppose you have never trained 18 year old recruits. I have. There is no time to teach someone how to lace their shoes because their mommy never did (these types really exist). Shouting at them does not work, throwing them in the brig does not work, physical violence against them is not allowed (and I don't think it would work). Strangely, a few more years as a civilian usualy works wonders, after which you have a recruit who is actualy of some use, instead of an annoyance.

    27. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does its name translate to "Wage the Dog?"

    28. Re:grow up? by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      Or more likely, terrorism

      /me makes a particularly bad immitation of Bob Dylan
      "Come soldiers and generals from all the land
      And don't ask the questions you can't understand
      Old enemy's dead, there's a new one to stand
      Your history lessons are aging
      Just forget the Commies, there are new fears at hand:
      The buzzwords they're a-changing!"

    29. Re:grow up? by orim · · Score: 1

      The terrorists. Post 9-11, the answer to everything international is "terrorists."

      Please report to the nearest reeducation camp immediately.

      --
      "If you could only see what I've seen with your eyes..." - Roy Batty
    30. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tell you, keep an eye on those Estonians...

      Seriously speaking, a war is just one (and the most dramatic) crisis Finland may face. For example the police may ask for military assistance during peace when necessary.

    31. Re:grow up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score: -1: Paranoid Bullshit

  30. Not everyone lacks net in the Finnish army by bioglaze · · Score: 1

    I had a crappy connection with my laptop and gprs cellphone when i was doing my service (9 months), but I also could have been fine without them. I know no one who suffers/suffered from net addiction.

    --
    Who is John Galt?
    1. Re:Not everyone lacks net in the Finnish army by niekko · · Score: 1

      A friend of friend of mine is serving in the Finnish army right now and he is almost all the time connected to IRC via his N-Gage with gprs. Very handy especially in an encampment if you are addicted... In the barracks they do have computers with an Internet connection, but of course free time is limited.

    2. Re:Not everyone lacks net in the Finnish army by tziko · · Score: 1

      Being currently in my seventh month of service, I can also confirm this. Bringing in a laptop and using your cell phone as a tool to connect to the internet is not hard at all. Most people also have free time at least a couple of times a week, as well as the weekends. The first two months (basic training) are probably the period with the least amount of free time, but after that it can get easier.

      The army isn't only about learning how to kill as many enemies as possible with your rifle, though. "Internet addicts" such as these are most likely skilled with computers, and should be able to get into some of the more specialized technical schools that are available after their basic training. There are jobs for coders, graphical designers, administrators, etc.

      If you're also interested in officer training, schools such as the Signal and Electronics School in Riihimäki (Viesti- ja Sähkötekninen Koulu) train reserve officers and NCOs that do some slightly more important jobs during their last 5 months of service, and leave the army with a work diploma. Having just completed the computer course at the aforementioned school, I can heartily recommend it to any nerd such as myself who also wants to be trained as an officer and get as much out of the mandatory service here as possible. There are quite a few nice perks, not the least which is being able to work inside on a computer during the days, instead of crawling around in the forests -- especially now, during the terrible weather that we've been having in northern Europe. ;)

  31. The question is? by jimmydevice · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can I get disability and/or workmans comp for this malady?

  32. Finland == social democracy, not socialism by Cryofan · · Score: 1, Informative

    You know that they make Nokia phones there, along with many other consumer goods. It is capitalism, but a form of capitalism wherein all citizens get more benefits from capitalism. Finland has a strong welfare state. Half of all Finns live in government owned housing.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:Finland == social democracy, not socialism by klmth · · Score: 1

      Government owned? Surely you mean government subsidized.

    2. Re:Finland == social democracy, not socialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of Capitalism was spelled out well enough by Rand. She was Russian; interestingly enough, Marx was German, and Hitler was French.

      What's this mean?
      Who is John Galt?
      $

    3. Re:Finland == social democracy, not socialism by LardBrattish · · Score: 1

      Probably Government owned. England had state owned housing when I was growing up. Rents were cheaper than the private sector & there were generally large estates of government owned housing; so I leave it as an exercise for the reader to guess what the crime rate was in these areas ;)

      --
      What are you listening to? (http://megamanic.blogetery.com/)
    4. Re:Finland == social democracy, not socialism by duvin · · Score: 1

      government subsidized

    5. Re:Finland == social democracy, not socialism by PenguiN42 · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can manufacture consumer goods privately under socialism, too. You just can't have a "captialist class" making the profit.

      --
      The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
  33. Not surprising by slubberdegullion · · Score: 0, Troll

    Armies must be constantly tested in the real world (that means wars) or they will not know what is effective and what is not. Sort of like compiling a program to work out the bugs. If the American army stopped going to war as regularly as it did, soon you would see far more silly initiatives and such, because there would be no consequence. This is a nuance which liberals often miss in their "anti-war" stance.

    1. Re:Not surprising by dragonp12 · · Score: 1

      Ah, so the US army invaded Afghanistan and Iraq to keep in practice! That explains everything!

      --
      This is me. Don't like it? That's unlucky.
    2. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Armies must be constantly tested in the real world (that means wars) or they will not know what is effective

      Indeed. Where would the US be if all those valuable naked human pyramid skills would become obsolete?

    3. Re:Not surprising by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      Wow!
      This is the stupidest thing I have read in a while.
      Killing people for practise?
      Fighting a war for the sake of war?

      I really truly hope there are not many who think this way. I didn't think anyone would. Then again, I'm young and naive. Alternatively (hopefully) parent was just trolling.

    4. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you hate America? We have never wronged anyone... You all hate us because of our freedom. That is why Denmark is under constant terrorist attack. Because they have freedom like we do.

    5. Re:Not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Surely you mean "tourist attack"?

  34. Very lax checks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Finnish military is based on the principle of every man going through the obligatory service (6 to 12 months), it is obvious that there are all kinds of people with all the disabilities and other problems young men have in general.

    However, in addition to these normal problems, since 80s (or even earlier) the Finnish military has begun to release people with rather silly excuses. Basically this has lead to a situation where you may be released because you have problems with motivation. Of course they always figure out some excuse like "mild depression", "sleep problems", "unstable personality" and whatever you can say about almost any person if you stretch the definitions enough. Having "Internet addiction" in the list doesn't surprise me at all because if you'd rather be at your computer than in the military, "Internet addiction" is the medicalised excuse they might use.

  35. not as before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those Burly Finns where are they now?

  36. If They Wanted To Get There Fix... by Snagle · · Score: 2, Funny

    they only need to look back to the 90's (yah i know its hard to remember) when MOST people got their porn from magazines! God the 90s sucked...

    1. Re:If They Wanted To Get There Fix... by kfg · · Score: 1

      A number of years ago I inhereted a good chunk of the guitar oriented sheet music collection of a music teacher. Among my haul I was rather surprised to find a page torn out of a magazine with a Tom Lehrer song on one side (of the top of my head I don't remember which one, I think it was The Irish Ballad) -- and a picture of a girl on a pony on the other.

      No, I'm not making this up, not even the bit about the pony.

      It's something of a major geeky knick-knack, Tom Lehrer and pornography in one, but there are really only a few select people I can even show it to.

      KFG

    2. Re:If They Wanted To Get There Fix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is that you don't find so much teen (18-19 yo) girl porn, which is the like of porn most of men crave for. The only source of this porn in Finland is the net.

  37. Bah! by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, if Linus Torvalds can do it (He served in the Finnish army too, remember!) then any computer addict can. Suck it up and get a technical position, solider!

    1. Re:Bah! by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, if Linus Torvalds can do it....then any computer addict can.

      According to legend, he pulled a McGuyver: he built a secret PC out of spare tank, riffle, and field radio parts.

      "Sarge, Why is that young man scooting that grenade around on his desk and clicking the pin like that, staring into a glowing helmet?"

    2. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he even had a superior nicknamed 'colonel panic'...

      It's funny. Laugh.

    3. Re:Bah! by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

      I'll bet the Finnish army are already getting e-mails from /. weiners who want to join up so they can feel closer to Saint Linus.

    4. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has been a case where a guy in a technical position got kicked to non-tech, because he was too tired to carry out his duties due to excessive chatting.

    5. Re:Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He actually joined the officer corp. So it wouldn't have been a sarge saying that.

      he and a friend decided that it would be much more interesting not running around in forests, but rather learning how to tell others to do so.

  38. don't make fun, netadditiction is ligitimate! by randyest · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's right -- ligitimate!

    Check out the poll and submit your thoughts to their hi-tech CGI script, and you'll see for yourself:

    Thank You For Filling Out This Form
    Below is what you submitted to netaddic-data@netaddiction.com on Wednesday, August 4, 2004 at 02:12:49

    Ligitimate_Mental_Disorder: No


    Wait. I voted "no," so it's not ligitimate, but maybe it's still legitimate. I'm confused.

    Aw, screw it -- I'm going to play some Doom3.

    --
    everything in moderation
  39. It builds character by Three+Headed+Man · · Score: 1

    Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, performed a stint in the Finnish army. Why don't these geeks understand?

    --
    I'm probably at the karma cap. Mod up a funny troll instead, it lightens the mood :)
    1. Re:It builds character by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those geeks must be Windows users.

  40. I wish.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that I could postpone my job to look at pr0n 24/7.

    lucky bastards.

  41. It's true but there's more in it... by VolatileSamu · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...and it has been happening for few years.

    It's really not just their addiction that excuses them from serving their country.

    I think the main reason is their lack of interest and ofcourse they are in a such a bad shape that it's impossible to manage the armyduties.

    I mean that if you sit in front of your computer for 12 hours a day and then you suddenly have to wear 30-40 kilos backpack and told to march 10 kilometres.

    --
    /* If everybody would be like me the world would be much better place to be - at least in my mind. */
    1. Re:It's true but there's more in it... by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a crazy idea, but I'll put it forth anyways. I'm sure someone can dispell it if it is totally incorrect.

      If you go in to the military and are a lardass like many people who spend 12 hours a day in front of a coputer (/me raises his hand), you will begin to lose weight. Not really by choice either. I expect that you will probably lose about 20 kilos in the first month if you are in the upper part of the overweight category of the lower part of the obese category.
      Once you lose that weight, if you are given a 20 kilo pack, your body really doesn't feel much different.

      The muscles of your body are used to carrying the extra 20 kilos, so if you add another 20 kilos there really isn't any net change in weight. Of course, the pack has to fit decently, but most do.

      I'm sure the first month will be extra hard, but
      you probably won't be losing muscle mass during that time ;) and once you get over the initial hump, the added weight you had before would of have become an advantage.

      Apparantly the fitness test for some smokejumpers (from a field and stream a couple months ago) is to be given a 50 pound pack and told to hike 3 miles in the woods in 45 minutes or less. I can do that, although it will really wear me out. Of course, it will really wear someone out who weighs 140.
      On the other hand, I have an insane amount of will power and push myself really hard when I do something, muscle pain and stiches be damned.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    2. Re:It's true but there's more in it... by mkv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's really not just their addiction that excuses them from serving their country.

      First of all, they're not excused but their service is postponed.

      I think the main reason is their lack of interest and ofcourse they are in a such a bad shape that it's impossible to manage the armyduties.

      I mean that if you sit in front of your computer for 12 hours a day and then you suddenly have to wear 30-40 kilos backpack and told to march 10 kilometres.


      Second, you don't just pack you'r backpack and march the distance, before that you jog, go to the gym, run everywhere you are going and do marches with battle-gear only. Nobody in the army is so stupid to think that a normal guy could just all of a sudden become fit enough to do that, come on.
      There are different physical standards in the finnish army of course, and for example paratroopers have to be in great condition just to get accepted for training but the normal finnish conscript starts physical training gradually and should be in the best condition after ten or so weeks of training.

      --
      The secret to a successful /. career: Blame Microsoft
    3. Re:It's true but there's more in it... by joib · · Score: 1

      One problem is that overweight people easily get injuries. Running around the woods in the dark is a good recipe to sprain your ankle or some such. Doubly so if you're carrying 20 kilos of lard in addition to your kit.

      Another problem is that the fat people slow everyone else down, reducing the effectiveness of their training.

    4. Re:It's true but there's more in it... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      you can't be in such a bad shape(that you couldn't get through the army).. because then you can get 'b' rating and even be freed from the physical shit(our unit had one guy with continious 'freed of combat and sports training' iirc, combat training is the running in the woods part so he got to shoot). if you can walk you can get through the service if you're in the right place(the system doesn't take good enough care of this though).

      it's psychological(the failing), the guys could easily get a service post that wasn't too hard for them physically. for it to be a physical reason to get 'e'(postponed) you would need to have gotten some serious injury that would heal up later.

      some fault is in the system itself which does _not_ take care of this for the rookie every time(the system is changing though and they're supposed to spot these things faster, like if someone just can't do physically something but tries anyways because of not wanting to fail.. which can be dangerous). also only couple of branches have tests before the actual service on the conscripts if they are physically fit for the service on those branches.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  42. ehhh... by I7D · · Score: 1

    More like "not Finnish"

    --
    Neil is that you? Yeah yeah, it's me... Neil...
  43. What about television? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Boatloads of people are zombified by television and movies, at least these soldiers were (hopefully) doing something interactive online, and possibly learning useful stuff. I'd rather be addicted to something I can learn from, than television full of infomercials and Jerry Springer.

    1. Re:What about television? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... I did my 11 months -95-96 in Finnish army, and we had movie theater (movie night every week) and a chance to watch TV every evening - AND even had a TV once with us on a camp / forrest trip, what-ever - and electricity, coffee machines, computers... Electric heating... guns. Everything geek needs.

  44. Elsewhere on Slashdot... by lewko · · Score: 4, Funny
    Meanwhile, further down Slashdot's front page is this article about next generation hi-tech combat gear.

    Tell the addicts about this stuff and they will sign up in a flash for the ultra-realistic first-person shooter immersion experience!

    --
    Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    1. Re:Elsewhere on Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in the Finnish army they wont!

  45. Legitimate? Yes by Sebby · · Score: 1
    It can be an addiction - just like anything else - when it starts affecting other aspects of your life in a negative way, be in personal, professional way or otherwise.

    Just because it's related to computers (or perhaps "geeks") doesn't make it any less of a problem that needs to be dealt with.

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  46. why don't they... by s4m7 · · Score: 1

    The finnish just need to get a new research program like we have in the US, and these 'E' status soldiers will promptly be made into test subjects for the new internet enabled super suits.

    then everyone gets to be happy.

    --
    This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
  47. Just the typical nerd syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I understood this news so, that the net addiction even wasn't the main problem. Instead, these poor nerds just didn't have any social contacts or skills, since all their friends were in the net. And suddenly they find themselves in same room with 10 other men.

    Also, they were used to sleep all days and be in the net all nights, which is kind of a problem when you should wake up 6am and go sleeping 10pm.

  48. neat by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot took out a few soldiers. What service can't we deny?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:neat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Women? It's not really denying service if it was never available to begin with, right?

  49. Oh great... by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

    I'm only half Finnish, (the other half Dutch), and I already did my time in the Dutch army. *sighs* I lose out on both sides.

    --
    home
  50. In Japan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soldiers excused from service because of internet addiction... IN JAPAN!

    Oh wait... IN FINLAND!
    Nah, definately less convincing.

  51. What the Finnish Army does by Crizp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Finnish army practices lying in the snow, waiting for enemies to take out with one shot of the rifle.

    If you want winter experience, learn from Finnish, Norwegian or Swedish soldiers.

    When I served my time in the Army, in Harstad, Norway (look it up)in jan-jul '97 there was a snowfall record. 2,5-3 meters of snow in valleys and -15 to -35 Celsius was the norm.

    Advantages: You learn to handle extreme cold. It's easy to dig trenches and to camouflage the tent.

    Disadvantages: It's bloody cold. When you've had your 4 hours of sleep inbetween watches, the uniform is not frozen anymore, but it's still damp/wet. When you get outside everything turns to ice.

    Super-duper-advantage: During watches I got to see the Hale-Bopp comet at night, in perfect sky conditions. With night vision goggles too, that was incredible (and quite green/white). I missed an attack on the base though, the enemy got first strike there... :)

    1. Re:What the Finnish Army does by Nivag353 · · Score: 1

      Curious:

      (1) Were you punished for dereliction of duty?

      (2) Would soldiers in snow be easy to detect
      using infra-red scanners?

      To be honest, I probably would have been looking at the commet...

      However, war exercises are serious - better to learn then,
      than make mistakes during a real war. Yes, mistakes in
      wartime happen, but practice increases your ability to
      achieve "your" objectives.



      -Nivag

    2. Re:What the Finnish Army does by Crizp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (1) I was not punished, 'cause the platoon leader was asleep and you can't really hear the difference between weapons since all the grunts use Heckler&Koch AG3's. We (always two on watch detail but the other guy was busy looking at the comet too :) sounded the alarm after a couple of rounds so as far as the lieutenant knew we shot first.

      (2) It's not that hard even if the soldier is wearing full winter camo. The winter camo is (and should be) a bit dirty, that together with shadows and other things you just notice exposes the person quite fast. Unless he's really really good at crawling and sneaking. Slowly.

      The military service is something I learned a lot from. I already knew about safe weapons handling since I've been shooting rifles and pistols since I was twelve, but stuff like makeshift first-aid (making stretchers, wound handling, etc) and learning to calculate avalanche risk, rescuing people from avalanches, what to do if you're taken by an avalanche (surf's up - hold your breath. People mostly die from drowning in an avalanche since they breathe the fine snow on top of the avalanche before getting buried). We got to see avalanche rescue dogs in action - those canines are insanely amazingly fast at finding people!

      Navigation with map and compass, navigation without compass, how to make good shelter if you haven't got a tent etc. Lots and lots of valuable knowledge.

    3. Re:What the Finnish Army does by joib · · Score: 1


      The Finnish army practices lying in the snow, waiting for enemies to take out with one shot of the rifle.


      And other armies don't practice ambushes?

      Personally, I'd rather lie in the snow than in some muddy jungle infested with all kinds of creepy things.

      When I did my military service (in Finland) IMHO the worst weather was when it was around 0 degrees and raining/snowing, because then there was no way to keep dry. OTOH, when the temperature was below -10 there were no problems, as long as you had enough self-preservation instinct to brush the snow off your clothes (so it wouldn't melt and make you wet).

      Though one irritating thing about really cold weather was that my nailbands often started to bleed. I guess the mittens we were issued weren't warm enough or something.

    4. Re:What the Finnish Army does by Crizp · · Score: 1

      Hehe it was an attempt at a joke which I don't get myself now. Guess it was WWII based - german soldiers had worse winter attire and wasn't as trained in cold/snow combat as the Finnish, and AFAIR got killed in large numbers.

      I'm glad we didn't have any rain while we had war games. That would be a pain, true. Or in the summer - dirt, water, and bugs galore (I hate bugs).

    5. Re:What the Finnish Army does by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Royal Marines, who spend lots of time in Norway, and are in fact charged with defending it should something bad happen (Bush - I'm looking at you) :)

    6. Re:What the Finnish Army does by KjetilK · · Score: 1

      (1) I was not punished, 'cause the platoon leader was asleep and you can't really hear the difference between weapons since all the grunts use Heckler&Koch AG3's.

      Hehe. Well, for all the drills we had, I never learnt anything. The problem is that nothing ever goes wrong for the mistakes you make. Typical example: I was at an exercise at Kongsberg (then home of the swift reaction batalion), and I was in good camo. We were attacked, and they are coming down the hill-side in plain view. From my little nest, I could have picked out the whole platoon. And of course, I fired with blanks. Problem is, there was no way in hell they could have seen me, because of my camo (I didn't see any wargames judges around, but if they were there, they probably couldn't see me either) so they just walked on, directly towards me. They first discovered me at two meters, and then they started firing at me with blanks, allthough that was well within the safety range.

      We had the same kinds of drills every few weeks. Nobody ever learnt anything. I got so tired of the mind-numbing stupidity that I wrote a proposal for the platoon. But the moronic officers simply couldn't carry it through. It was fun for me, but still not a learning experience. I managed to sneak up on a moose, I thought it were enemy soldiers, I only stopped a meter short... Whooah.

      Nevertheless, I met so much fascism and so many fascists in the Norwegian military, and when I realized that they actually was right in how to build efficient military forces, I became a pacifist.

      People mostly die from drowning in an avalanche since they breathe the fine snow on top of the avalanche before getting buried

      Who told you this? It is not the fine snow that kills, that is, they kill very few. What kills is that you don't have the muscles to keep the chest up, so you stop breathing due to the pressure.

      Hm, I took a course by Krister Kristensen, Norway's foremost research, and he is also the guy giving the courses in the military, so chances are we have got the same course.

      Navigation with map and compass, navigation without compass,

      Well, my experience was that most officers couldn't find their way out of a paper bag, and that was reflected in how they taught... I did some teaching, but many wore a thick layer of clue repellent...

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    7. Re:What the Finnish Army does by Crizp · · Score: 1
      The problem is that nothing ever goes wrong for the mistakes you make.
      True. Major flaw. They should use live rounds :)
      We had the same kinds of drills every few weeks. Nobody ever learnt anything.
      I learned lots of group advance and group retreat tactics, not that I'll ever find a use for them...
      I managed to sneak up on a moose, I thought it were enemy soldiers, I only stopped a meter short... Whooah.
      Happens to me every couple of months, more in the fall. But then I live in the forest and elk-hunting is prohibited in my county. Big fucking scary animals up close. And the grunting sound deer make when they're looking for mates, echoing in the forest: Spooky stuff. But I digress...
      Nevertheless, I met so much fascism and so many fascists in the Norwegian military, and when I realized that they actually was right in how to build efficient military forces, I became a pacifist.
      I've become a pacifist too, but not based on the fascism (which is how it must be done for an efficient military, as you say) but rather a change in personal beliefs. I'd still kill to protect family and close friends under threat though. I think. But then again you never really know until it happens.
      It is not the fine snow that kills, that is, they kill very few. What kills is that you don't have the muscles to keep the chest up, so you stop breathing due to the pressure.
      I (and the avalanche expert who taught us (red cross I guess, don't remember the name)) obviously stand corrected.
      Navigation with map and compass, navigation without compass,
      Well, my experience was that most officers couldn't find their way out of a paper bag, and that was reflected in how they taught...
      Guess my contingent was lucky, our officers (especially the company chief Captain) were skilled, good teachers and genuinely nice people. Except for a couple of UB's of course. Always count on the UB's and sergeants to be most fascist.
    8. Re:What the Finnish Army does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might remind non-Finnish Slashdotters of the magnificent Finnish performance against Soviet forces in the Russo-Finnish War.
      Even after WWII Stalin didn't advance into Finland, and that is fscking amazing.

    9. Re:What the Finnish Army does by KjetilK · · Score: 1

      I (and the avalanche expert who taught us (red cross I guess, don't remember the name)) obviously stand corrected.

      Hm, it is sort of weird... There was a lot of incompentence on avalanches in the military up to the Vassdalen disaster in 1986 IIRC. An avalanche killed 16 soldiers. They had ignored every warning, and after the disaster they used dowsing to try to locate the victims. Obviously they found none that way.

      But I really thought they had rinsed out those since then, and I got that impression from Krister Kristensen too.

      Guess my contingent was lucky, our officers (especially the company chief Captain) were skilled, good teachers and genuinely nice people. Except for a couple of UB's of course. Always count on the UB's and sergeants to be most fascist.

      Oh, they do exist. I know many nice people who are officers, from leutenants and upwards. But I have my doubts if they are suited. BTW, the UBs I had was just as anxious to get the hell out of there as the rest of us....

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    10. Re:What the Finnish Army does by Crizp · · Score: 1
      They had ignored every warning, and after the disaster they used dowsing to try to locate the victims. Obviously they found none that way.
      Man, if they'd tried to demonstrate dowsing when we took the course, I'd have laughed so loud I'd end up in the stockade for sure.

      We learned the "lots of people in a line, poking with rods" approach.
    11. Re:What the Finnish Army does by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      If you want winter experience, learn from Finnish, Norwegian or Swedish soldiers.

      Ahh, you have never heard of Fort Drum, New York Don't let the average weather chart fool you. The average low temperature in January is -10 C (I was kind enough to do the conversion for you)... but it wasn't uncommon to get several days to several weeks of weather far colder than that. city-data.com pins it at -13 C.

      The average snowfall in December is listed as below a meter... but I don't think that's accurate at all. We got several 2-meter snowfalls, and it simply snowed a lot.

      We called it the "Land of the Frozen Chosen."

      Advantages: You learn to handle extreme cold. It's easy to dig trenches and to camouflage the tent.

      "Ground's frozen, Sergeant." "Good. I'll ask for heavy equipment to dig us in."

      We had white camo netting for the tents. It was just as annoying to put up as the green/brown stuff we used during summer.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    12. Re:What the Finnish Army does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude.... that wasn't the enemy that hit the base while you were watching Hale Bopp... That was Heaven's Gate picking up "The Prepared" to get on board the space ship...

      Pardon the off topic...

    13. Re:What the Finnish Army does by John+Newman · · Score: 1

      I hate to remind you, but you fine Finnish folk were on the German side of WWII. It was the Russians that you did all the killin' of.

      It wasn't really your fault whose side you wound up on - the Russians attacked you first. France and the UK actually considered sending troops to help, which would have put them at war with both Germany and Russia. Later on, the Germans were able to persuade you to join in their invasion of Russia in the hope of recovering the territory you had earlier lost, and you fought with the Germans until almost the end of the war.

    14. Re:What the Finnish Army does by Crizp · · Score: 1

      Seems my WWII history is suffering from severe bit rot. I take it I stand corrected. Again. I won't bother being an ass and double-check it, I'll take your word for it :)

      I'm not Finnish though, I'm Norwegian :)

    15. Re:What the Finnish Army does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ground's frozen, Sergeant." "Good. I'll ask for heavy equipment to dig us in."

      Nah, you take TNT and blow the ground up enough so that it can be digged with the showel. At least that's what we did in .fi army

    16. Re:What the Finnish Army does by upside · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, after WW2 quite a few Finnish officers were employed by the US military. They had expertise in intelligence (having fought the Soviets) as well as in guerilla and cold climate warfare. Larry Thorne (born Lauri Torni) is probably the most famous.

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    17. Re:What the Finnish Army does by GQuon · · Score: 1

      Another Norwegian chiming in.
      Before Finland joined the Germans against Russia, people in my area were collecting money and equipment to send to Finland. Some people even volunteered to help fight the USSR.
      That help stopped when Finland joined with Germany though. At least Finland refused to send their Jewish population to the camps.

      --
      Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    18. Re:What the Finnish Army does by GQuon · · Score: 1

      Fascist by what definition?

      We didn't dicuss a lot of politics where I was. We'd talk about football, computers, music, our superiors, that sort of thing.

      The only elements that I got pissed off at was those who would rather complain about orders than actually follow them, and then harass other soldiers and break the regulations for fun and negative profit.

      --
      Irene KHAAAAAAN!
  52. They are... by toddhisattva · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I guess they are Finnished!

    1. Re:They are... by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 1

      especially funny if pronounced in Mortal Kombat voice....

      "Finnish him!"

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
  53. arnold would say.. by js3 · · Score: 1

    those are girly men. It seems like the army just wanted to get rid of em

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
  54. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finland has not seen a war in five decades. We all know what it means for a military that it has no actual war experience... All those who fought in the last war are already retired.

  55. Only 6 months?! by tangent3 · · Score: 1

    Oh come on, we have to serve 2.5 years of compulsory military service here and myself being a net addict survived it. Although it was really painful thinking about all my MUD-mates questing without me, leaving me to fall behind in experience points and levels :(

    1. Re:Only 6 months?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6, 9 or 12 months depending on what you do there..

    2. Re:Only 6 months?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really just 6 months for all, it's 6 months just for those internet addicts and other losers. I think more than half spend over 6 months, either 9 or 12 months. Anyway if you're there only 6 months, you usually spend nearly all of your weekends home. And in most cases, there are several computers which you can use and of course you can bring your own laptop.

      And in most cases, you'd become very familiar with Nokia's hi-tech text messaging device. It's almost like irc, but with one line display and encryption. =) That should keep you entertained until the weekend.

      I spent the whole year there and never heard that anyone dropped out because of any other addiction than drugs.

  56. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well, as Reuter's piece tells, 82% of Finnish men complete their military service. That's quite a high percentage and enough for a credible defense.

  57. Its true.... by andreyw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The internet IS like an addiction. I personally would go nuts without it - my mind just needs to be stimulated with the overabundant torrent of information... It gives us the ability to access anything, anywhere without much ado, and crutch or not, it gets pretty damn addictive - and is something the mind doesn't want to part with...

    Take something as simple as a word dictionary. Are you more likely to page through a 600+ book or quickly pop onto www.m-w.com? Exactly... We get used to that. And when we get denied Internet, its almost like sensory deprivation - losing a sense of touch with the world...

    Or maybe I just need to get some sleep...

    P.S: BTW, great excuse to avoid the army...

  58. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Once upon a time I had a psychology professor who started talking about how hard it was growing up in a predominantly Finnish neighborhood in, as I recall, Gary, Indiana ( Gary, Indiana, Gary Indiana. . .oh, sorry), because the Finns hated Americans.

    Someone in the class asked him, "If they hate Americans, why did the come here?"

    The answer?

    "Because they hate Russians even more."

    KFG

  59. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by hopey · · Score: 1

    Try out.

  60. Reasons by Mika_Lindman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All finnish men have to do their military service, which is 180, 270 or 360 days. Usually men go to this service after "basic" schools, at the age of 18 or 19. The military service starts either july or the next january. This leaves you time, when you have nothing to do ( if you can't get a job ).

    During this time some ppl get addicted to net. And it's not just the net, it's the hours. Pretty much every net addict has bizarre sleeping pattern. Usually you go on chatting/surfing/playing 15-24hours, and then get some sleep, when you get really really tired. You have no obligations to be awake at some given time.
    One finnish news site said, that the biggest problem was adjusting to regular sleeping pattern, not the actual net addiction.

    The first weeks in the army are ofcourse the worst. You are in a totally new enviroment, you don't know anyone, and you live in a single room with 8-12 other men. Lots of people keep yelling at you and bossing you around, and that makes people very stressed. During those first weeks, pretty much everyone wants to quit.
    When you add sleep disorder to this, you pretty much are done for it. There's no way you can maintain your mental health and motivation.

    I had no problems during my service time, but I know what those sleep disorders from too much computer using can do to you. It's total hell trying to live as a productive member of society, when you simply can't sleep during the nights. Almost screwed up my school because of that, but luckily I'm over it now.

    But it still bugs me that sleeping 7-8 hours a night and spending 9 hours a day of your time to work, it leaves you so very little spare time. Atleast to compared to the situation where you had nothing else than spare time.

    1. Re:Reasons by eetu · · Score: 2, Informative

      > All finnish men have to do their military service, which is 180, 270 or 360 days.

      Hmm, sounds exactly like the army propaganda, not mentioning the alternatives at all. The civil service lasts for 395 days and there's also the choice of serving around 200 days in prison (which is what I did).

      I agree with the rest of your post, though. It is a total hell trying to live as a productive member of the society when you can't sleep during the nights. Been there, done that.

      --
      "If I can't have a revolution, what is there to dance about?" - Albert Meltzer
    2. Re:Reasons by ztane · · Score: 1

      ... And the last thing you would want to give to a person that suffers from insomnia is an assault rifle... after five weeks of service we were crawling in a forest, rifle loaded with right bullets, shooting automated targets...

    3. Re:Reasons by @madeus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > All finnish men have to do their military service, which is 180, 270 or 360 days.

      Not true.

      They can come to any decent EU country (like the UK) and not do it. We are not still living in the 1900's.

      Finns can tell their government to fuck off, but so many find it's easier 'just to go along' with things and not rock the boat then justify that to themselves later (with some spurious trite reasoning).

      It amazes me that a nation of largely intelligent people fall for the propaganda that national service being useful, and that governments in countries like Finland and Germany still manage to get away with it. In reality it's a barbaric anachronism and in the face of so many other countries that have had it in the past having now phased it out, or having announced plans to end it, people in Finland should really be questioning this rather than going along with the idea out of a sense of tradition. The lack of recognition for conscientious objectors in Finland is something I find particularly morally repugnant (and let's not even get into the sexism debate).

      It would have been phased out by the EU by now, if it hadn't been for the dissent of countries like Germany that are so dependant on it for the success of the state, where it's used to make up for a shortfall of civil service employees (and so to allow the state to get away with not paying real wages) but that's a different matter that has to do with poor, neigh incompetent governance, it that's not a valid excuse for keeping in place a system of forced slave labour.

      The overwhelming chorus of advice from renowned intelligence organisations like Janes continues to be that it's not a way to create any sort of useful military force, and that's it detrimental to overall performance of what should a dedicated and professional organisation made up exclusively of people who want to be there to do what is a very important job.

      My advice to people in Finland would be to just go and live in another EU member state like the UK, where we don't force people to signup to work for the government (and where they don't get to tell you what weekends you can go home and what ones you cant).

      We don't have national service and it's precisely because of that (and because we do the Right Thing (TM) and choose to pay to have a large, competent and professional army rather than trying to scrape one together from kids who don't really want to be there) that we have one of the most powerful armies in the world (in the top 10, after the USA, India, Russia and Korea (north and south)). For such a small country, that's not bad going, and vastly better than the majority of the rest of the world, even with their swelled ranks fluffed with conscripts.

      Given the evidence against it, and the insistence by the intelligence community that it's not only of no value, but can be of negative value it's a wonder people still do it. It all comes back to 'doing what's right' vrs. 'doing what's easiest'. If more people had a backbone it would have been abolished long ago, the army would be stronger, the people would have more freedom and they'd be quite a bit happier.

      With a society that has the kind of outlook they do on issues like this, perhaps it is not surprising that Finland has the highest suicide rate of any western nation.

      Finns, the government are there to serve you, not the other way around. Do yourself and your entire nation a favour and them to get stuffed. National service costs your nation money overall (through lossed taxes, equipment and wages), it doesn't give you a useful fighting force and it is part of an oppressive environment that harms the physiological well being of the nations citizens.

    4. Re:Reasons by jukervin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Finland UK
      Land area (km2) 305 000 241 590
      Land boundaries (km) 2 628 360
      Population 5 214 512 60 270 708
      GDP (USD) 142 billion 1 664 billion
      Annual military budget (USD) 1.8 billion 43 billion
      Available manpower 1 200 000 15 000 000

      How do you suppose we could create a paid army to protect a bigger country with long border against Russia with a fraction of the budget? A paid army of 40 000 would cost three times more and would be able to defend only part of the country.

      You make it sound like we live in the North Korea or something. The conscription is preferred by 79% of Finns according to the polls.

      Unlike Americans, I think most Finns don't consider the government to be evil or sinister. The government _does_ serve the people as we live in a well-fare state (at least for the time being) and this is what majority of the Finns want.

      P.S. You really did the Right Thing (TM) with Iraq... It really improved the safety around the world.

    5. Re:Reasons by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      The conscription is preferred by 79% of Finns according to the polls.

      Er, maybe this statistic would have been more impressive if you'd omitted the ones showing that this is almost exactly equal to the percentage of Finns not subject to it.

      Yeah, people will vote to stick somebody else with the bill (e.g. by forcing somebody to do the job instead of coughing up enough taxes to pay people what it takes to get volunteers). Duh.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    6. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The population of Finland is 5 million - certainly not enough to sustain any kind of professional army.

      England's population is a good 30 million, of course.

      I live in Singapore - population 4 million. Here it is compulsory to undergo national service.

      The truth is that people in developed countries have the desire and freedom to pursue what they want to do - and yet somebody must protect the defence interests of the country.

      Of course, this isn't stopping anybody from migrating to another country - which is your point from what I see, but if everyone thinks like you countries like Finland and Singapore are going to have major problems.

      I know I can tell the gov't to stuff themselves and move to Australia, which is a new favourite for lower cost of living, but for me it will balance out right. Singapore has a rigorous, stressful, very textbook-intensive education system - it's the only thing I find positive about the country. But in exchange for what you want, you repay the country for what has been given to you - many local students say that university education in the United States, etc is too simple.

    7. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are the shining example of the selfish juvinile trash that is unfortunately the majority anymore. The governments job is not to server you you lazy ass. You only convince yourself that is that way because you believe your entitled to crap you have no right to, because either your too lazy to get off you ass and make something of yourself, or you incapable. You need someone to blame your problems on because you can take responsiblility for you own worthless self. Grow up, if you can handle 6 months of service to your country, you dont deserve the right to call yourself a citizen, not that you would want to, being the self richeous ass Im sure you are.

    8. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lame troll!

      PS: *Paragraphs are your (possibly only) friend.*

    9. Re:Reasons by @madeus · · Score: 1

      The population of Finland is 5 million - certainly not enough to sustain any kind of professional army.

      That's not true though, not even remotely. There are certainly smaller countries that have professional armies and no conscription!

      Luxembourg has a 100% professional army with a population of what, a mere ~500,000? Size is most definitely *not* the issue. It's just some some countries are more liberal and others are more authoritarian (Singapore being a prime example of one that's notoriously very authoritarian - certainly by Western standards).

      Your assertion also ignores the more important fact is that professional independent military advice from think tanks the world over is that conscription armies are in reality useless at the task of armed defence. They are useful for labour for civil projects (building bridges, in national emergencies such as floods - things professional soldiers dislike doing too much of), but they are *not* an effective fighting force. When countries make assessments about the armed forces of other countries, 'conscripts' are not included in the core figure, but rather as an aside (this has actually been happening for hundreds of years, the core failings of conscripted forces have always been there).

      The reasoning is that modern soldiers must be experienced technical personnel and tacticians and you can't teach that unless someone *really* want's to learn it and they are willing to put the many months and effort in - it's really very difficult job and it takes longer to learn than most periods of national service even last. Conscripts in modern armies are bemoaned by most senior military personnel who'd much rather have dedicated professionals in their army, because they want competent focused people, not just kids who have been forced into it.

      Also see the argument about why it actually *costs* more money to keep a conscripted Western army than it does to run a professional one (because of the expense of good equipment, facilities, wages and lost revenue though not being able to tax income of otherwise high earners).

      Quick example:

      I pay more than 20k UKP each year in tax. If I was a conscript on a typical conscript wage, I would be on around 20K a year.

      If I was to work for 12 months for the state, that would make the state 40K a year worse off (plus the overhead of running conscription, plus the lost money that is not being pumped into the economy through my previously high salary, which is a not insignificant amount).

      If they were to hire a professional it would cost them around 35K a year. Even without the aforementioned overheads that's cheaper. And that's why countries have stopped doing it recently. It costs money in the long run.

      But in exchange for what you want, you repay the country for what has been given to you - many local students say that university education in the United States, etc is too simple.

      I would agree that good university education in the states must be paid for (and that state education there is not much cop). That has nothing to do with forcing men to do national service however. You get a good education system through high state funding, derived from high GDP and high taxation. What did you think taxes are for?

      Countries like France, the UK, Canada all have very nice standards of living, good heath care, good education systems, very relaxed environments and are comparably very liberal places to live. It's pure and simple illiberalism (and incompetant statesmanship!) to have conscription during peace time.

      But hey, if you think authoritarian systems of government make for a nicer global environment, feel free to vote your right to choose what to do with your life away and put that decision into the hands of a state bureaucrat! Personally I'd rather we had more accountability in government and more democracy and keep the ability to choose how I spend that time.

    10. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the worst rubbish I've ever read.

      People don't have freedom without the payments in blood of the people who defend their country. I think it was Rudyard Kipling who said that every country has an army. Either their own or someone else's.

    11. Re:Reasons by Mr+Europe · · Score: 1

      It amazes me that a nation of largely intelligent people fall for the propaganda that national service being useful, and that governments in countries like Finland and Germany still manage to get away with it. In reality it's a barbaric anachronism and in the face of so many other countries that have had it in the past having now phased it out, or having announced plans to end it, people in Finland should really be questioning this rather than going along with the idea out of a sense of tradition.

      You cannot name any of your relatives that we killed while stopping RUSSIANS attacking your country ! Most Finns can. That makes the diffrence. I'd rather serve and fight than flee to some country that uses "pound" to measure anything!


      My advice to people in Finland would be to just go and live in another EU member state like the UK, where we don't force people to signup to work for the government (and where they don't get to tell you what weekends you can go home and what ones you cant).


      Thank you for your advice. Don't call us, we'll call you.


      Finns, the government are there to serve you, not the other way around.


      Just as JFK said!

    12. Re:Reasons by @madeus · · Score: 1

      You cannot name any of your relatives that we killed while stopping RUSSIANS attacking your country ! Most Finns can. That makes the diffrence.

      No, ours tend to have died fighting German Nazi's rather than Russians.

      Pray tell, when are you expecting the Russians to attack again, and do you think you'd actually be able to stop them, seeing as if they did they'd attack via air like any other modern army, after first wiping out Finland's own air defence system using surface to surface missiles launched from well within the Russian border in all likely hood .

      The nature of combat between modern forces today is quite different from that in the first and second world wars, men with machine guns don't help defend against arial bombardment (something they could do with impunity until either the country surrendered or till all the strategic areas were secured with only light resistance, easily defeated by armed columns).

      I'd rather serve and fight than flee to some country that uses "pound" to measure anything!

      We don't use 'pounds' as a unit of mesurement. We are a member of the EU and use the same weights and measures as every other EU member state.

      Your lack of knowledge of knowledge of basic EU legislation is ironic for someone who goes by the nickname 'Mr Europe'.

      I've already amply stated the problems with Finnish national service (it's sexist (applies only to men), bigoted (does not apply to *some* religious groups, but does apply to others), undemocratic (the majority of those eligible for it vote against it and the total against it make up over 20% of population) and barbaric (it's the only nation in the EU that has political prisoners, we recognised conscientious objectors in the 1600's yet Finland is alone in the EU in not grasping the concept).

      It doesn't even make economic sense because it *costs* Finland millions of Euros and gives them virtually no strategic military benefit. France, Spain, Holland and others have all given it up because they have realised this. Mark my words, Finland will too, even if your a little slow.

      >Finns, the government are there to serve you, not the other way around.

      Just as JFK said!


      Then you beleive you are there to serve your government...

      What a sad existence to live in such complete subservience.

      I'd rather live to serve myself and my fellow man than to a bunch of bureaucrats, but each to his own.

    13. Re:Reasons by Mr+Europe · · Score: 1

      No, ours tend to have died fighting German Nazi's rather than Russians.

      I didn't make me clear. I meant that that the fact that foreign troops are occupying your country is very another thing than sending our troops to fight in another country !

      Pray tell, when are you expecting the Russians to attack again,

      The Russians are completely unexpectable.


      and do you think you'd actually be able to stop them,...

      At least 500.000 trained conscripts are better than 50.000 paid men! Ours strategy is to make it too expensive to occupy Finland. If we'll see that the borber is collapsing, we'll let them come. We'll go into the forests and start "the hunting".

      Your lack of knowledge of knowledge of basic EU legislation is ironic for someone who goes by the nickname 'Mr Europe'.
      Please don't go personal. Let's keep this between opinions and not between individuals.
      ..."the majority of those eligible for it vote against it and the total against it make up over 20% of population"

      When, where ?

      It doesn't even make economic sense because it *costs* Finland millions of Euros and gives them virtually no strategic military benefit.
      Annual military budget($)/capita: Fin=345, UK=713. And UK is even ten times bigger!

    14. Re:Reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, maybe this statistic would have been more impressive if you'd omitted the ones showing that this is almost exactly equal to the percentage of Finns not subject to it.

      Really? Do you mean equal to the percentage of Finns not subject to to it AT THE MOMENT, or do you count that persons already having gone it trough are not subject to it? If the former, I'd be really interesting in the figures that show that 60% of the males of right age are not subject to military service.

  61. Re:Finnish army needs no nerds like those sent hom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take it the Finnish heathens do not agree with Lord Bush's War on Brown People? Finland is now in the "with the terrorist" column. We, the glorious leaders of the Imperial States of America, were generous when we overlooked the anti-american slander in the "Star Wreck" trailer produced by one of your evil citizens and your involvment with the communist operationing system, Lunix, but our compassion has ended for your people. Prepare to face Operation Microsoft Bob.

  62. Re:Finnish army needs no nerds like those sent hom by marsu_k · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As a Finnish citizen I cannot understand why these people don't go for "civilian service" (I'm not sure about the correct English term here, but basically it's working for a year for a governmental/communal/nonprofit organisation instead of going to the army), which I personally did. You get the nights off, and you're likely to get a net connection at work as well.

    (Mind you, internet addiction was not my reason for not going to the army - my "work computer" during my service was a glorious Schneider 386SX with W3.11 and no net connection. But during my year I got exceedingly good in Solitaire. ;-)

  63. Finland + Internet = Monty Python sites by HonkyLips · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finland.

    Finland, Finland, Finland.
    The country where I want to be,
    Pony trekking or camping,
    Or just watching TV.
    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    It's the country for me.
    Verse: You're so near to Russia,
    So far from Japan.
    Quite a long way from Cairo,
    Lots of miles from Vietnam.

    Chorus: Finland, Finland, Finland.
    The country where I want to be,
    Eating breakfast or dinner,
    Or snack lunch in the hall.
    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    Finland has it all.

    Verse: You're so sadly neglected,
    And often ignored,
    A poor second to Belgium,
    When going abroad.

    Chorus: Finland, Finland, Finland.
    The country where I quite want to be,
    Your mountains so lofty,
    Your treetops so tall.
    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    Finland has it all.

    Repeat: Finland, Finland, Finland.
    The country where I quite want to be,
    Your mountains so lofty,
    Your treetops so tall.
    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    Finland has it all.

    Fade: Finland has it all...

    --
    Putting syrup in coffee is some form of blasphemy.
    1. Re:Finland + Internet = Monty Python sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy did i giggle when Michael Palin went there on his TV show..

  64. Heard on the news by RPoet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just heard a mention of this on the news. Someone was quoted as saying "for people who stay up all night playing computer games and don't have any friends, military service can be quite a shock."

    I'd say such people need that kind of shock more than most.

    --
    "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
    1. Re:Heard on the news by Neva · · Score: 1

      I'd reckon some of them might be MMORPG players. That stuff can take you in pretty bad, I've seen. Like skipping school and grieving over the limited hours in day one can stay awake and online.

      Growing up is what these kids need, and hopefully they'll get more out of their mandatory military service when they aren't so tied to virtual worlds anymore. (Or join the army's cyberdefence department by then)

    2. Re:Heard on the news by Nakamiya · · Score: 1

      Why does anyone NEED to grow up? Why should people be forced to live in your realy world when they are much happier in their virtual worlds? How does it hurt YOU if someone wants to spend their life playing games all the time? Infact it leaves more "real" jobs and women open for those of you who prefer the real world.

  65. Degree in CS by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 4, Funny

    "I'm sorry I can't join the Army because I have to play Counterstrike."

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  66. One solution ... by tenu · · Score: 1

    ... is to take your computer with you, that's what I did!

    The official reason for having the computer was to use it in a music project (which we did) in the military band where I did my service. I know a few fellows who did the same thing, so I guess the point is to choose the place where you do your service carefully.

  67. Fight to the Finnish? by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

    This is the military branch of the country that gave us the term "Finlandization," the process by which a portion of the country was ceded to the Soviets without them even asking for it

    --
    Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
    1. Re:Fight to the Finnish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finland did lose part of its geographical area to USSR because it lost the war, and because of the same pressure, a part was also rented. What is usually considered Finlandization applies to politics; politicians decided (over time) to maintain "good relationships" with giant neighbor and at the process limit some of their options rather than trying to maintain hard line of total ignorance towards a neigbor that could invade the country if irritated enough. Finnish industry did actually benefit from this, because they were able to negotiate bilateral pacts for oil and such, giving soviets well overpriced products in comparison. Of course that caused troubles when USSR fell, but for the time it worked pretty well. Please note that Finland did maintain full multi-party democracy for the whole time, unlike other soviet block countries, even if people in the media avoided saying certain things to keep it safe.

    2. Re:Fight to the Finnish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could actually argue if the war was lost or not; unlike many neighboured countries, Finland did manage to keep the independency.

  68. BREAKING NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Slashdot Subscriber dies from shock after being deprived of slashdot for 30 minutes due to 503 server errors! Slashdot to be accused in court of negligence!

    News at 11!

    1. Re:BREAKING NEWS by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Probably slashdot just got slashdotted.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  69. only stupid net addicts go to the army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sigh ...we actually have an option about mandatory army....we have public "civilian" thingy(cant remember the name in english ,doh! Alltough I myself is just doing that thing right now(got caught about slashdot while writing this) ((so dont mind this rough lame spelling))

    but my point is;
    I surf the internet all day long! =)
    no need for a low-tech army ;) i can be hi-tech while still serving my country.

    Ras

  70. So If I read this right... by howman · · Score: 1

    They get to go home and grow up... Give me a break, more like become more addicted to the net...
    So how does this conversation go?...
    'Ummm, I got a net problem so I can't serve...'
    'Ummm... ok, go home and grow up, come back in two years when you get over it....'
    'Dahhhhh right Louie, search da puddy tat.... Dahhhhhh...'

    --
    flinging poop since 1969
  71. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by Killeri · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Finnish performance in WW2 was mainly due to four factors. One, Stalin didn't send enough troops to the Finnish front so the Finnish army wasn't completely overrun. Two, the winter '39-'40 was very cold, even by Finnish standards, so the Soviet mechanical advantage was lost. Three, the Finnish army was very good in the use of artillery. Four, defending your homeland gives you some extra boost compared to simply invading some other country. I don't think that the "quality of the soldiers" was that much different.

    However, the recent studies have shown that most young Finnish people would jump to the arms if Finland were invaded, so I don't think this net addiction thing has any effect on that :)

  72. True by kopteri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw this same news at our local TV news too (I live in Finland). 6 months is the minimum these days. I did spend my own service during 1998 and I was there for 11 months, but I admit that I had my laptop and GSM-modem with me almost all the time (I was remote working from army).

    You can just imagine how our commanding officer was surprised when he opened the door into our tent and I was there surfing Internet in middle of the forest during my night shift by the fire. Laptop and GSM were powered from generator that we filled with fuel oil between 5-6 hours. Usually people were sleeping and that's why they were checking the tents during nights. :)

  73. NetAddiction.com... *Web* Site? by kmactane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does anyone other than me think that having a web site to combat net addiction is a little messed up? "Help, I've got net addiction, I need to spend less time online!" - "Oh, hey, there's this great web site that can help you with that, you want the URL?"

    Isn't that sort of like having your Alcoholics Anonymous meeting in a bar?

  74. Conscription in the US by carcosa30 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I often wonder if the United States is headed for a general conscription.

    Many other democratic countries have it, and arguably it's good for people. I often wonder how my life would have been changed by a term in the military.

    And hey, since we're now fighting an endless war, it seems more likely than ever.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    1. Re:Conscription in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it, I think the general population would be very against it. Hopefully if we beleive in freedom, then we should freely be able to choose to defend it.

    2. Re:Conscription in the US by vidarh · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And in most of those countries there are people being jailed for refusing because they consider it an infringement of their human rights to be forced into an organisation that can order them to take up arms.

      You'll also find that in most of these countries there is no such thing as "general conscription". It may be so in name, but most countries don't have the resources to operate a military that large, and in most cases only men are included to start with.

      In Norway, for instance, only about 40% of men complete their "compulsory" military service.

      What it boils down to is an arbitrary draft where whether or not you end up serving depends entirely on whether or not you put in an effort to stay out, whether or not you're ready to go to jail to stay out of the military (in some countries this isn't a particularly nice option - in Norway it often is, as unless you get the shortest duty period you're guaranteed to spend less time in prison than in the military, and in a "comfy" minimum security prison with possibility of leave and spending your time studying instead of working), or whether the officers at the camp you're directed to have a bad day or not the day you're ordered to report.

      Then, once you're enrolled, it is fairly arbitrary whether you'll stay beyond the first week or so depending on whether you happen to have a bad time and the mood of the officers again.

      In recent years, both Norway and many other countries who pretend to have general conscription have steadily decreased service periods. In Norway it used to be 12 months mandatory, 15 for the navy. Now it's quite common to get 6 months.

      They're also steadily easing up on people who refuse. During the 70's Norway had lots of people in jail for refusing, but due to the Vietnam war lots of youth started refusing stating Norway's membership in NATO as the reason and Amnesty started making a stink about political oppression, with the result that they now on the second refusal to turn up for the draft "take away your right to serve" to avoid having to try to draft you again.

      That was followed in the 80's by introducing opposition to the spread and use of nuclear weapons as a legal way of refusing the draft (you'll still have to serve a 16 month "civil" service period, usually working in kindergartens, nursery homes etc. as cheap labor) - it was a thinly veiled way of giving people who couldn't get away with using pacifism as their reason (which has been a legal excuse for ages, provided you can manage to convince a police interviewer that it's a serious conviction).

      Personally I think general conscription is a joke. There are bad sides to a career military, and I fully support encouraging people to serve. I don't even mind them taking the approach that you're by default being called in and have to refuse. I do mind being forced to take part in something where it is highly likely that I sometimes in the future might be ordered under threat of a military court martial to do something my convictions won't let me do.

      I'm not talking about a blanket refusal to take part in a military operation - I don't consider myself a pacifist though I have a strong aversion to violence - but a blanket refusal to put myself under the command of someone who might very well decide to send people to participate in the next illegal occupation force the US decides to put together, for instance.

      For my part I've made a very clear decision to refuse to serve on those grounds, NOT on one of the legal grounds (though I could perfectly well use the nuclear weapons excuse I mentioned earlier - it's sole purpose is to avoid having people like me make Amnesty complain about Norway after all), but it would be dishonest.

      I started out refusing by demanding to be exempted. You can't do that, and the Norwegian DOJ doesn't understand the concept, so the Department of Justice called me in to a police interview (with an officer that lacked the most basic understanding of Norwegian grammar, I was so tempted to refuse to

    3. Re:Conscription in the US by LordK2002 · · Score: 1
      Many other democratic countries have it, and arguably it's good for people.
      Yeah, because treating your citizens like government property is a great way to increase their loyalty and love for their country.

      K

    4. Re:Conscription in the US by Tar-Palantir · · Score: 1

      I am an adamant pacifist. If the United States institutes general conscription without provision for civilian service, I will have to leave the country (which would make me sad - I still have great respect for my country, if not for all its deeds), because I am not willing in any circumstance to serve in the Armed Forces.

      Therefore, I am taking dispute with your statement that arguably it's good for people. There are many pacifists like myself who would have to deal with a system that completely contradicts their beliefs. I also have a hard time seeing how military training would in and of itself help any citizen's life.

      Sincerely,
      Tar-Palantir

    5. Re:Conscription in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, as a product of the Finnish conscription service I can testify that the brainwashing works. And just this past summer we've had newspapers running historical stories about the heroes who stopped the Russian onslaught 60 years ago, and it did wonders to increase the general acceptance of the military. There's been barely any criticism of this militarist tendency at all...

    6. Re:Conscription in the US by infolib · · Score: 1
      Many other democratic countries have it

      In Europe, it's probably somewhat on its way out. France abandoned it in 2001. Here in Denmark the general feeling is that it's gotta go sometime in the future, but that it's not politically convenient right now.

      This makes sense since after the end of the cold war we won't have to stop Soviet tanks. Instead we have a small core of professional soldiers sent to places like Kosova, Iraq, Cyprus, Afghanistan etc. There's simply no plausible need to defend against a large-scale invasion in the foreseeable future.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    7. Re:Conscription in the US by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      How would it help?

      Millions of lazy-ass motivationless teenagers (or people in general if you'd rather) might just possibly learn some discipline, respect, and get a badly needed attitude adjustment.

      Not to mention they'd get in shape, and very likely learn some skills that benefit in a civilian job (technical skills, for example, as well as the leadership training officers and NCOs gain are highly valued)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    8. Re:Conscription in the US by microTodd · · Score: 1

      Its more than a distinct possiblity.

      Take a look at the "Universal National Service Act of 2003"

      Senate #89
      House #163

      www.congress.gov, search on the title.

      There is a bill on the floor to re-enact conscription in the United States.

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
    9. Re:Conscription in the US by BrokenSoldier · · Score: 1

      Hooah, there, Neo. Like I posted earlier- I saw kids grow up. Im from the Midwest and did Basic and AIT down south. A large majority of my CO. was young, other than caucasian, and young. Most of them had just graduated HS and didnt have the chops for athletics or the money for college. Some had kids ( guys, AND girls) and needed the extra income and didnt want to sling burgers. In my opinion, 4 in or 4-10 in. Your choice.

      --
      If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is.
    10. Re:Conscription in the US by BrokenSoldier · · Score: 1

      *emphasis intentional on young*

      --
      If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is.
    11. Re:Conscription in the US by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

      I should have qualified my comment re: benefits of military service.

      I think that in certain ways, some degree of regimentation is good for people. On the other hand, there may be qualities that military regimentation breaks down.

      Just to make it clear, I'm utterly opposed to military conscription. Perhaps it's not so horrible in historically neutral places like Finland, but I'm certainly against it in countries where the military is used by an unelected commander in chief to wage wars of aggression against lesser countries. I'm also against it in burgeoning secret-police states.

      --
      Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    12. Re:Conscription in the US by microTodd · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, your sig mentions plans to delay US elections. Do you have a reference to this? Is this legislation on the Congressional floor somewhere? I'm truly curious, because if true its frightening...

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
    13. Re:Conscription in the US by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

      I should probably get rid of that. That was in reference to the Bushies' move to "delay elections" in the event of a terror threat or attack at or around election time.

      Wouldn't that be nice for them? Of course they'd just want the process to go smoothly.

      Like it did last time.

      --
      Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    14. Re:Conscription in the US by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      The current bill being considered for instituting a draft does have provisions for civil service and concientous objector status. CO status requires you to be completely opposed to war and military service in general- If you simply do not support the current war, you don't qualify. Thats why Bill Clinton needed to get an educational deferment. He was against Vietnam, but not against war in general.

  75. Generals looking at this all wrong by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny


    "But Sir, I know how to slashdot the enemy!"

  76. That's more or less the idea by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most developed countries that practise conscription (manditory military service for all or at least all male citizens) anymore don't do it to maintain a serious force. The face of warfare has changed, as the latest Gulf conflict really demonstrated, such that lots of cannon fodder with machine guns, which is about all conscripts are good for, can't hold a candle to technology. Well you can't have a conscript flying a plane or driving a tank, that takes a volunteer.

    Doesn't mean it's worthless though. It's an "in case shit", to borrow a Chris Rock phrase, policy. Suppose someone was trying to invade Finland and NATO just wasn't able to send immediate help. Maybe it's WWIII or something. Whatever, just suppose. If everyone has had basic training, when you draft them it takes much less time to get them up to speed. You don't have to train them from scratch, or send them totally untrained against the enemy, you just give them a quick refresher and they can fight.

    This goes double for countries with Finland that have, shall we say, inhospitable terrain.

    Thing is, even if Finaland made every able citizen in their country serve in the military full time, they'd still not have a real military force to speak of only 1 million people and at conscript level abilityies. Never mind you'd destroy the economy doing that. So they don't, they have a small perminant military for the little things that need it, and then give everyone a little training, just in case.

    Switzerland takes theis to the extreme, actually requiring all their households to have a government issued machine gun, which their citizens learn how to use during manditory military service. That combine with the terrain would make Switzerand an iron clad bitch to invade. That, and the finincal cooperation, were the two reasons the Nazis didn't invade.

    It's not a real common practice these days, but it still works.

    1. Re:That's more or less the idea by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      Foot soldiers can't do much when faced with carpet bombing except turn into minced meat. Not even artillery is worth a damn if air-superiority cannot be obtained. Modern-day IR technology can be used to spot individuals from high in the sky, so the infantry has no stealth to speak of either. What foot soldiers _can_ be used for is secure a city in a hostile take-over, as tanks and planes are inappropriate.
      The people of Finland, however, will never allow an attack, and as such our military is to be entirely defensive. - And foot soldiers have no place in defence except for blocking bullets.

      Finland has recently started aqcuiring a number of armored vehicles to replace an aging garage, but completely neglected the defence of air-space. With hostile skies the vehicles stand defenseless, and are as such completely useless.

      To cut a long story short, in my eyes the Finnish army is the epitome of incompetence. The regular staff is the bottom layer of individuals which could not get a decent job in civilian life. A lot of them are alcoholics, the bread of the State the only thing separating them from the averenge bum.

      The only country Finland could have a chance against in a war is Sweden, and that is until they've finished the process of reforming their military. (Yes, they have one. Any notion of otherwise is wishful thinking and ignorance of simple fact. If the Russian Bear was to walk over our border we'd simply be the next Chechnia.

      I'm going to stop ranting now, before I pop a vein.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    2. Re:That's more or less the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah. i'm from switzerland and find it very odd that the swiss army hands out a StGw 90 to everyone.

      Mine is in the drawer, along with 50 bullets in a box which i must not open.

      as i heard the soldiers can't take the StGw 90 home anymore now because of the reform "armee XXI".

    3. Re:That's more or less the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chechnia (is that how it's spellt? :o Chechznya?) gave one hell of a fight to the Russians. I don't know about the Russian Bear anyways, considering the condition of the Russian military I think it could be possible to win that war. Though it would be a close one, in reality we lost both the Winter War and the Continuation War. We are better equipped though, but the element of air superiority is MUCH more important nowadays, as you said. Against any other (relatively big) country we wouldn't stand a change though, they would just walk over.

      On-topic, even though people will start calling them losers and sissies, I think there's some point in this. Just like you can be addicted to heroine, you can be addicted to the net, too. It's a bit different, but in it's most serious form it can be considered just as bad, I think. It's about time somebody regocnizes this somehow.

    4. Re:That's more or less the idea by duvin · · Score: 2, Informative

      >Switzerland takes theis to the extreme, actually requiring all their households to have a government issued machine gun...

      That would of course be an assault rifle. A machine gun would be a bit overkill :)...

    5. Re:That's more or less the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to make things clear, you can have enlisted personnel in conscription army. This is precisely the case in the Finnish military. Our F-18s are not flown by conscripts.

      As for conscripts being useless in modern warfare, that's bs. The average kid these days knows well how to use technology and learn new things. Why wouldn't they be able to, say, handle communication equipment or be aircraft mechanics. Or why wouldn't a conscript be able to launch a Spike ATGM at a shiny M1A2?

      Also, how could you get enough people for a professional army in the case of small countries like Finland? I doubt even the USA could handle a major war without conscription.

    6. Re:That's more or less the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "that lots of cannon fodder with machine guns, which is about all conscripts are good for, can't hold a candle to technology."

      This is a load of garbage.

      You're forgetting that the Iraqi army lacked the _will to fight_. You need good leadership and determination to effectively defend a country. The U.S. got there easy.

      Try Finland. We have a reserve of about 350000 men and over 500000 can be mustered in total if necessary. Want volunteers? Wage war to Finland and you'll find half a million volunteers right away.

      A good demonstration of the will and skill of the Finnish conscript army is the Winter War during WWII when the Soviet Union, with ten times the resources, failed to occupy Finland.

      Just like you, the Soviets thought they would beat Finland in a matter of weeks. They never did.

    7. Re:That's more or less the idea by evilandi · · Score: 1
      AC: As for conscripts being useless in modern warfare, that's bs. The average kid these days knows well how to use technology and learn new things. Why wouldn't they be able to, say, handle communication equipment or be aircraft mechanics. Or why wouldn't a conscript be able to launch a Spike ATGM at a shiny M1A2?

      Because they're conscripts, by definition they don't want to be there.

      When given the controls of vehicles under fire, conscripts have a tendency to just go home. I'm sure you can think of at least one major recent war where the defending army's conscripts simply drove home when attacked. Conscripts only fight when the alternative is a very long journey through inhospitable terrain.

      It's not a matter of technical skill, it's a matter of whether they'd hold the front line or bugger off.

      As for maintennance work, would you want to fly a jet that had been given a half-arsed service by someone who didn't want to do it?

      --
      Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    8. Re:That's more or less the idea by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Foot soldiers can't do much when faced with carpet bombing except turn into minced meat


      Finland is a large country, and about 80% of it is covered with forests. Good luck carpet-bombing anyone there. It didn't help in Vietnam, and it wouldn't help in Finland.

      Finland has recently started aqcuiring a number of armored vehicles to replace an aging garage, but completely neglected the defence of air-space.


      Not quite. The planes in the Finnish Airforce are just about the best money can buy (F/A-18 Hornets). And they have advanced SAM-batteries (Crotale NG's, Russian BUK's)

      To cut a long story short, in my eyes the Finnish army is the epitome of incompetence. The regular staff is the bottom layer of individuals which could not get a decent job in civilian life. A lot of them are alcoholics, the bread of the State the only thing separating them from the averenge bum.


      I actually know people who are in MPKK (equivalent to West Point). And let's just say that I don't share your "vision" about them.

      And the Finnish Soldiers in Kosovo are highly respected by the others there. They are not outclassed by those "professional" militaries in any shape or form.

      The only country Finland could have a chance against in a war is Sweden


      Of course if Russian used all their military-power in invading Finland, they could do it. But that's not the point. The point is that invading Finland would cost them too much, that the effort is not worth the cost.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    9. Re:That's more or less the idea by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      he face of warfare has changed, as the latest Gulf conflict really demonstrated, such that lots of cannon fodder with machine guns, which is about all conscripts are good for, can't hold a candle to technology.


      Just because they are consripts does not mean that they are "cannon fodder". Yes, Iraq's military was not much to write home about. But that does not prove that conscripts can't be an effective fighting-force. Finland has deployed troops to Kosovo for example, and they compare favourably to US and UK soldiers, even though Finns are just conscripts and US and UK troops are uber-leet professionals.

      Conscripts are not necessarily crap, and professional soldiers are not necessarily uber-soldiers.

      And besides, there are good reason of having a consript-army here. The wartime manpower of Finnish Army is about 350.000 men. That's enough to defend the country. If we had a professional army, we might have about 50.000 men. Even though those men would have better equipment, there would just bee too few of them. they could defend Helsinki, but that's about it, the enemy could freely invade other parts of the country. If they tried to defend other places as well, they could only send few thousand troops (with no reserves) against several divisions.

      Thing is, even if Finaland made every able citizen in their country serve in the military full time, they'd still not have a real military force to speak of only 1 million people and at conscript level abilityies.


      The war-time force is 350.000 men, and it's enough. And I fail to see anything wrong with their "abilities". One military-expert was asked on the news that how do the Finnish soldiers compare to US soldiers for example. His reply was: "they compare just fine in both training and in abilities. American soldiers are not somekind of super-soldiers when compared to Finnish soldiers"
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    10. Re:That's more or less the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "American soldiers are not somekind of super-soldiers when compared to Finnish soldiers"

      Wait, Lynndie "Dog Face" England isn't a super-soldier? My faith in Lord Bush has been shaken!

    11. Re:That's more or less the idea by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      Finland is a large country, and about 80% of it is covered with forests. Good luck carpet-bombing anyone there. It didn't help in Vietnam, and it wouldn't help in Finland.

      With the first line, I was not speaking about Finland in particular, but of modern warfare in general. In the case of Finland, the point I made about IR tech applies, rendering the first line appliant.

      Not quite. The planes in the Finnish Airforce are just about the best money can buy (F/A-18 Hornets). And they have advanced SAM-batteries (Crotale NG's, Russian BUK's)

      Yes, all 63 of them. SAMs are mostly useless against stealth aircraft, and rely on being able to k-kill aircraft before they can deliver their payload.
      Quite simply, the one with the most planes wins.

      I actually know people who are in MPKK (equivalent to West Point). And let's just say that I don't share your "vision" about them.

      And we all know this group of people you know stands to represent the rest of all the regular staff. Close to nothing of what is really going on gets reported because the whistleblowers are not allowed anonymity, like people here on /.

      And the Finnish Soldiers in Kosovo are highly respected by the others there. They are not outclassed by those "professional" militaries in any shape or form.

      They have all recieved special training for this mission, and as they get quite a lot of pay for it, they should be concidered "professionals".

      Of course if Russian used all their military-power in invading Finland, they could do it. But that's not the point. The point is that invading Finland would cost them too much, that the effort is not worth the cost.

      It would not take all their military power, but only enough to establish air-superiority and surpress infantry.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    12. Re:That's more or less the idea by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      SAMs are mostly useless against stealth aircraft,


      Two points:

      1. Overwhelming majority of worlds planes are still non-stealth
      2. Tell you comment to the pilot of the F-117 that the Serbs shot down

      And we all know this group of people you know stands to represent the rest of all the regular staff.


      But the group of people you know, does represent the military as a whole?

      They have all recieved special training for this mission, and as they get quite a lot of pay for it, they should be concidered "professionals".


      And those same soldiers form the core of the war-time military. And do you assume that in case of war, the people are just handed an assault-rifle and told to go shoot some Russians? No, they receive training as well.

      It would not take all their military power, but only enough to establish air-superiority and surpress infantry.


      And doing that would cost them too much when looking at what they get in return. Comprende? you cannot invade a country with air-force, you need troops in the ground. And just look how well Russia is doing in Chechnya. Why would it be any easier in Finland?
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    13. Re:That's more or less the idea by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the bridges and tunnels in Switzerland are all wired to blow, so any invading army would have to fight over mountains, getting shot at from every house on the way by skilled soldiers. Sounds like hell.

    14. Re:That's more or less the idea by Ceriel+Nosforit · · Score: 1

      Two points:

      1. Overwhelming majority of worlds planes are still non-stealth
      2. Tell you comment to the pilot of the F-117 that the Serbs shot down


      1. Stealth aicraft will be deplyed where they are most effective. They are not invisible to radar; _only harder to detect_.
      2. Refer to your sources, so I can properly address the issue.

      But the group of people you know, does represent the military as a whole?

      I never said I knew a group of people. I've made inqueries and detected reoccuring statements of alcoholism.

      And those same soldiers form the core of the war-time military. And do you assume that in case of war, the people are just handed an assault-rifle and told to go shoot some Russians? No, they receive training as well.

      Not so. The people who go on peacekeeping missions are voulunteers, and not forced against their will like the majority of the military force.
      In case of war, how long do you think the bulk of the fighting force would be trained? A week? - In one week Finland would be overrun. The people who go on peacekeeping operations are trained much longer, and to compare them with a Finnish soldier rushed onto the battle field from civilian life is pure fallacy.

      And doing that would cost them too much when looking at what they get in return. Comprende? you cannot invade a country with air-force, you need troops in the ground. And just look how well Russia is doing in Chechnya. Why would it be any easier in Finland?

      In return they get the Finnish BNP, natural resources and strategic geographical advantage against the rest of Europe. Comprende?
      You _can_ invade a country through air force, and unless you've been living under a rock you'd know it happened last time right after 9.11.2001.

      And how is Russia doing in Chechnya...? - Dropping vacuum bombs, internationally banned as cruel, on civilians. And the world does not lift a finger.

      --
      All rites reversed 2010
    15. Re:That's more or less the idea by mijok · · Score: 1

      Suppose someone was trying to invade Finland and NATO just wasn't able to send immediate help.
      We've never wanted to count on NATO being willing to send help - even if we were a member country. During the cold war the U.S. put a lot of pressure (behind the scenes) on Finland to join because the distance for nukes to Moscow launched from here would be pretty short and because the Finnish army did gather intelligence on Soviet troops across the border (an operation called "Stella Polaris", which is still quite hush hush). However, the reasoning here was that in case of a full-scale nuclear war a country with five million people wouldn't matter much regardless of it being a NATO member and thus the only thing we'd get from NATO membership is a place on the Soviet target list so a strategy of neutrality and making occupying hard enough not to be worth the cost was chosen. Therefore the Finnish army practices guerilla warfare tactics and the Soviet union was made well aware of Finland not being very hard to invade (because no matter what we did we wouldn't be able to stop it) but an occupation would be costly.

      --
      Karma. Moderation. Is my .sig good now?
    16. Re:That's more or less the idea by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      1. Stealth aicraft will be deplyed where they are most effective. They are not invisible to radar; _only harder to detect_.


      how many stealth-fighters does Russia have?

      2. Refer to your sources, so I can properly address the issue.


      For example:

      "On the fourth night of the air war, March 27, around 8:45 in the evening an F-117 was heading back to base after dropping at least one of its 2,000-pound, laser-guided bombs on a target near heavily defended Belgrade. Suddenly, with little or no warning, an SA-3 missile flying at three times the speed of sound and guided by an improvised network of Serbian radars, exploded in a blast of shell fragments a fewft from the plane, slamming it into an uncontrolled dive. The missile's 130 lb warhead is designed to detonate when it gets within 20 ft of its target. Stunned by the explosion, the pilot struggled against what he said approached pressure five times the force of gravity to yank the handles below his seat to eject from the crippled warplane."

      I never said I knew a group of people. I've made inqueries and detected reoccuring statements of alcoholism.


      Well whoop-de-fucking-do! Those take place in just about every military around the world! And alcoholism is pretty common in Finland so there are bound to be few problem-cases in the military as well.

      The people who go on peacekeeping missions are voulunteers, and not forced against their will like the majority of the military force.


      No-one is forced to serve in Finland. you can choose civil-service instead. Majority still choose regural service. And according to studies, overwhelming majority of Finns are prepared to defent the country if needed.

      In case of war, how long do you think the bulk of the fighting force would be trained? A week? - In one week Finland would be overrun.


      This may come as a shock to you, but wars don't "just happen". There would be advance-warning giving more than enough time to bring the troops up to speed.

      The people who go on peacekeeping operations are trained much longer


      Actually, they receive regural training in the Pori Brigade. the additional traning is only relevant for peace-keeping-missions (mob-control, applying of force etc.). They receive the actual combat-training during the regural-training.

      In return they get the Finnish BNP


      I assume you talk about GNP? Do you really assume that Russians could just annex Finland and Finlands GNP would then be added to Russias? It doesn't quite work that way, espesially not after a hostile invasion.

      natural resources


      yeah, Russians are really craving for those Finnish forests, wilderness, swamps and lakes.... Just about the only "natural resource" this country has is the people and their know-how. And those can't be controlled like you could control oil for example.

      You _can_ invade a country through air force, and unless you've been living under a rock you'd know it happened last time right after 9.11.2001.


      Is Al-Qaida in control of USA? No? That's what I thought.... to control the country, to INVADE it, you need troops.

      And how is Russia doing in Chechnya...?


      Like shit. And they are just facing some rebels running around with AK-47's and RPG's, not a modern army with modern equipment.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    17. Re:That's more or less the idea by shadowjk · · Score: 1

      > Actually, they receive regural training in the Pori Brigade. the additional traning is only relevant for peace-keeping-missions (mob-control, applying of force etc.). They receive the actual combat-training during the regural-training.

      Mob-control, applying of force, etc, was atleast trained during my time in the navy's coastal land forces in the finnish defence forces. There were also excercises held together with Swedish and Norwegian military forces, with focus on peace-keeping missions.

    18. Re:That's more or less the idea by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      You don't know what you are talking about. Counterexample: Israel.

    19. Re:That's more or less the idea by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Propably, but they receive even more of it.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    20. Re:That's more or less the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've detected a startling amount of over confidence in airforce ability in this discussion. To straighten this out, an airforce has never managed to invade a country succesfully, not even afghanistan. The US just used already existant militia forces there, and gave them there airsupport.
      Now this does prove airsupport is very important, but airsupport is no magic bullet. Modern IR forinstance is little to no good in forests by example, because plants block IR radiation, if you look at a IR picture you'd notice any part of a vehicle hidden behind a tree or so can not be seen in IR.

      Considering thus that finland has a huge forested area, the airforce would have to be directed by invading infantry forces, which is quite tricky, expecially considering how sometimes even the US airforce has now and then hit there own troops. And to be honest the russian airforce isn't that good.
      To also get some opinions from alternative sources then literature, I also discussed invading a place like finland with some people who used to be or still are in the american forces, expecially ones who used to be busy with assesing military ability and such. And none of them really looked forward at all to fighting in a place like finland, which has very difficult terrain, which greaty increases the effectivity of infantry. As well as that finnish troops are trained and have equipment for extreme cold, and most other forces don't or not very large amounts.

      Quickshot

    21. Re:That's more or less the idea by manu81 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just like to address few things.

      Any serious military attempt to seize Finland would be noticed 2-6 months before the attack could be made. It is just not possible to move all needed manpower and equipment for attack to Finland to the border without anyone noticing, and if you close your borders, its kinda clear message. This means that army has decent time to mobilize and give some extra training. Of course all bridges, roads and such could be mined before any attempt to take them could be made. In example, all finnish bridges and tunnels have holes in their concrete structure, where the explosives will be placed in case they need to be destroyed. I have even heard that there is book which contains all information about all bridges, their locations and amount of explosives needed for their destruction.

      Our soldiers in peacekeeping missions get only 1-2 months of extra training before going to peacekeeping missions.

      Of course it is possible to make surprise (finnish air defence would have ~20 minutes to react) attack with airforce only without any warning. But still, ground attack would be months away.

      And about those pesky IR-thingies. do you people understand that they have very limited capability in forests. IR can be used to see in dark yes, but you can't see through things, such as forest. Thermal imaging can help with that, but mostly, thermal imaging equipment good enough to penetrate thick forest is in satellites, and in some recon planes and finland is very big country to sweep through constantly and accurately enough, to make any diffirence. When ever Finnish forces would be concentrated enough(like counter-attack) to use air force against them effectively, finnish forces would of course use their own air force and SAM power to counter enemy air superiority for small time period, so finnish forces can make their maneuver without full air power in their neck.

      And in the end, i'd like to remind that Finland has much more modern air defences that of serbs or iraq. Especially in southern Finland where the BUK M1 units are situated.

      And there is even more, i'd much more compare finnish situation to soviet vs. afgans than serbs or iraqis. Afgans were able to fight off soviet air attack with only stingers. While the terrain in Afganistan is very much diffirent than in Finland, when thinking about war, they give the same obstacles, just in diffirent form. I'd even say that when thinking of air defence, Finland is better country to defend than Afganistan. There is no better place to ambush air forces than country with lots of forests and modern air defence systems like BUK M1, Crotale NG and Igla.

      What comes to alcoholism, yeah, military personnel drinks like any other worker class dude here. Mostly the stories what i heard in army were urban legends, totally incorrect or just greatly exaggarated. Even my father had heard few of the same stories that go around nowadays, and he was in finnish army 1952. If you ask about the stories from someone who has been in army, lets say 1980 you probably get even more same stories :).

      And final part of my long post. I don't know if you have read the studies, but fins have one the highest ratings when they question the citizens will to defence their country against foreign invasion'. Me and most of my friends are ready to take arms if Finland is invaded. I have no will whatsoever to take arms to attack anywhere, or to fight in any other theater than Finland.

      So, i'm not forced against my will to defend my own country, my friends aren't, and i think most of fins aren't. Even most of those people who didn't like army and hated it because they though there wouldn't be war (waste of time) would be ready to take arm once they noticed that Finland is under attack. There is small portion of people who don't like to use arms, i accept their choice. There is small portion of people who would be there against their will to defend their country. But so small that they probably wouldn't have any serious input in war anyway, they can always serve elsewhere than in flashpoints.

      But mostly, above all, there would be determined finnish army with intention to fight off any invader.

    22. Re:That's more or less the idea by shadowjk · · Score: 1

      > Because they're conscripts, by definition they don't want to be there.

      Despite not much else impressing me in the finnish defence forces, their ability to place conscripts in suitable tasks was amazing. The way most people adjusted to military life was amazing. Every conscript had a task, which had been chosen for them, and often the choice was a right one, putting the right kind of people in the right places. People didn't just loiter around waiting for the 6, 9, or 12 months to end, trying to avoid doing anything useful in the meanwhile. People were actually giving their best, doing their best.

      Those who couldn't adjust, those who really didn't try, who didn't want to try, etc, really stood out compared to the others, and were obviously not sent to under-officer training or anything such. That's why you'd most likely have your Jet served by someone who was an airplane fanatic in his civilian life, or an aspiring engineer, or an enthusiastic mechanic interested in something else than trying to make Opel cars stop rust.

      The defence forces capability to see the individual, surprised me. It strengthened the teams in an unbelievable way.

      One could say that a 'professional' army is just as bad, where all the soldiers are those who could not afford to go to a real college and thus ended up in the military, and wouldn't be much different from being forced to do it.

    23. Re:That's more or less the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      btw. Finland has not only radars, but also a widely spread air watcher network... consising of lame airmen. But anyways: AAA would know if the radar wouldn't see. Deployable watchtower was my form of standing hell :D

      I hoped those binoculars had some whiskey inside. No stealth plane is invisible!

    24. Re:That's more or less the idea by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      Because they're conscripts, by definition they don't want to be there

      No. COnscription is merely a technique for ensuring a large pool of people with fundamental military skills, in case of conflict.

      It has been the preferred method for Europeans for centuries. It works fairly well, all things considered.

      Note that the US Draft, when we had one, was not especially like the European Conscription systems. Note also that European-style conscription fits the citizen-soldier model quite well, unlike the professional army we have traditionally used in the USA.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    25. Re:That's more or less the idea by evilandi · · Score: 1
      CrimsonAvenger: It has been the preferred method for Europeans for centuries

      I am European (the word "arsed" should have given that away :-). We, the United Kingdom, packed in conscription in the 1960s for exactly the reasons I stated: conscripts do a half-arsed job and flee under fire. France did the same for similar reasons, ending conscription in the 1990s.

      (As for the shining example, Israel, suggested by another poster, I suspect that if their opponents were actually allowed to own any weaponry with which to place them under fire, they'd flee too. Threatening children throwing pebbles whilst you sit in an armoured tank with a 20mm cannon does not count as "under fire". That counts as "cowardly bullies".)

      To guarantee dedication under fire you either need volunteers, or an alternative which is worse than dying at the hands of the enemy.

      --
      Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    26. Re:That's more or less the idea by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      Machine gun would still accurate, if the weapon in question was capable of firing more than one round per depression of the trigger.
      Of course some people choose to limit the scope of the word.
      Some differentiate between assault rifle and squad automatic weapons by calling the SAW a machine gun and the others rifles.
      Others draw the line between single opperator and multiple operators or man-portable and vehicle mounted. The SAW is man-portable and a single soldier can weild it effectively. Other machine guns are not portable by a single soldier and require a crew of two or more to effectively transport, setup, and weild.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    27. Re:That's more or less the idea by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      I don't count the UK as European. The UK traditionally used a long service professional army, and only resorted to conscription in time of war. Perhaps I should have separated out Continental Europeans from you lads in Britain...

      And yet...

      WW2 was fought with conscripts on both sides.

      whatever that action in 1919 in Russia was called - the one the Brits/French/Amis did against the Reds.

      As was WW1.

      the Franco-Prussian Wars.

      the Crimean War

      the "Napoleanic Wars" in general.

      To guarantee dedication under fire

      You CANNOT guarantee dedication under fire. All you can do it make it more or less likely. Training does that, and experience. The method of picking people to train doesn't do much one way or another.

      Note that a wartime draft does not, of itself, imply the sort of conscription used to maintain a large pool of trained men. As often as not, wartime drafts were used to allocate men equitably among the services, glamourous and otherwise.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    28. Re:That's more or less the idea by evilandi · · Score: 1
      CrimsonAvenger: You CANNOT guarantee dedication under fire. All you can do it make it more or less likely.

      Okay, so which makes it more likely to be dedicated under fire, and which less likely:

      1. People conscripted by force of law, or
      2. Willing volunteers?
      --
      Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    29. Re:That's more or less the idea by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      Answer: Neither. Alas, being a willing volunteer in no way prepares one for his first taste of an artillery barrage. Or his first taste of inbound machinegun fire. Nor does being conscripted by force of law make one LESS likely to be able to deal with those events.

      Training, training, training. That's all there is, or ever was to the subject. The USA uses the doctrine of "Train like you fight", meaning make training as much like "real combat" as possible. Even so, it is impractical, for a lot of reasons, to bombard your men in training. Hard on the men, if nothing else.

      Now, it must be conceded that a long-service professional army tends to be better trained. That is, however, not because they are volunteers, but because they are "long service".

      And it's not necessarily true. Most officer corps consist of volunteers, most higher officers are long-service (almost by definition, but there are other ways to get high rank), yet officers (especially junior officers) are as likely to panic under fire as anyone.

      The US War Between the States is a useful study when looking at the difference between professional soldiers, volunteers, and conscripts. This because both sides had units that fit each of the three categories. In any given battle, some units of each side would be professional, some volunteer, some conscripts. The only general lesson to be learned about how they stood up to battle was that those units with the longest combat histories tended to suffer fewer casualties, given the same situation and the same orders.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    30. Re:That's more or less the idea by evilandi · · Score: 1
      It simply isn't a case of whether they're likely to "deal" with it, it's a case of whether they're going to run away.

      History HAS shown, time and time again, repeated recently in Iraq, that conscripts desert under fire in larger percentages than volunteers/professionals.

      Training doesn't come in to it. Dedication does.

      No amount of training is going to answer the question: "Am I prepared to die for this cause?"

      A volunteer has already asked him/herself this question before entering the battlefield. A conscript doesn't really have to consider this until he/she is under attack.

      --
      Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    31. Re:That's more or less the idea by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1
      /laughs

      No, history hasn't shown any such thing. Nor did Iraq show such. It's not like the American forces came under heavy bombardments of the kind they were dishing out. Showing that Iraqi conscripts (and their volunteer officers) panicked when bombarded says little about the difference between volunteers and conscripts, since the volunteer force you are using in comparison (UK and US) didn't get bombarded in return.

      "Am I prepared to die for this cause?" Interesting question. Not meaningful, but interesting. If you think you know the answer before the first shell lands near you, you are a fool.

      I volunteered to be in the USNavy many years ago. Never had the chance to find out whether I could handle combat, since I was never exposed to any back then. I don't pretend to think that my volunteering made me a "better" man than, say, a conscripted German sergeant in Holland in 1944.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    32. Re:That's more or less the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and young, brave Finnish Imperialist is born.

    33. Re:That's more or less the idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised that you fail to see that the moral of the army is tightly connected to the cause. Conscripts need to be given a reason to fight. Someone invading your country is the perfect reason, at least, for us Finns. In a purely defensive role, conscripts are the way to go.

      On the other hand, if the government really can't give a real reason to fight a war, they need a professional army. You need pros to fight for a stupid excuse thousands of miles away from home just to seize some oil fields...

      In short, a conscript army is the perfect choice to defend small countries. An army of professionals is mostly for colonialists.

      The Finnish army has a purely defensive role.

    34. Re:That's more or less the idea by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Interesting discussion. I think a machinegun is essentially a firearm which can sustain automatic fire for fairly lengthy periods of time. As such, a typical machinegun is able to change barrels in order to prevent overheating.

      A typical machinegun is also much more accurate when fired on fully automatic than most lighter or smaller firearms.

      There's no match really, a true machinegun is something to be feared, whereas a typical rifle fired on full auto against long distance targets is much less effective.

  77. Geeks in the army by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I began my service in the Royal Norwegian Airforce my commanding officer said: "Oh, you are IT educated - i have just the place for you". So I spent 12 months (well, 10 - but they call it 12) as a sysop on a encryptet telephone system via SHF. I sat in front of a SCO Unix box an monitored the lines, added users etc...

  78. internet mind control by captain1010 · · Score: 1

    Maybe they spent a little too long staring at this:

  79. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by loraksus · · Score: 1
    It was a little bit more than a run for their money.
    The Finns also had their fair share of heros and one guy who can arguably claim the title of "Best Sniper Ever".
    Granted, there are others, Zaitzev (and Koenig, who uh, lost) and Hathcock (perhaps a tie) that would be in the running, but I honestly don't think they would take first)
    If you look up "hard-core motherfucker" in the dictionary, you should see a picture of Simo Häyhä
    Simo, after he was shot in the face by an exploding bullet (a wound that took years to recover from) managed to find his rifle and killed the Soviet that had wounded him.

    More info here.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  80. Re:NOT ACTUALLY FUNNY, MOD SIDEWAYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok. Can I be a pussy because it was a stupid joke instead?

  81. Re:NOT ACTUALLY FUNNY, MOD SIDEWAYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet you're one of the guys who mod bluescreen and slashdotting jokes up...

  82. Re:NOT ACTUALLY FUNNY, MOD SIDEWAYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really. But I do mod funny jokes up.

  83. Linux Addiction.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does Linux addiction also count as a reason for not performing millitary service in Finland?

  84. Re:Finnish army needs no nerds like those sent hom by Kassiopeia · · Score: 1

    Maybe they have a shred of intellectual integrity and don't want to add to the on-going myth used to ostracize civilian servicemen that the civilian service is the easy way out for the ones "who can't take it". Civilian service is for ideological reasons, period. If a person is mentally or physically unfit for the army, they should not serve at all.

    Besides, civilian service means seven extra months not studying properly, and having to endure the social stigma.

  85. "Sent back home to grow up"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is hilarious. The general mindset here in Finland is that to be a man, a person must serve in the army. Nobody ever bothers to mention what's so special in the Finnish gene base that causes Finnish males to be boys before they serve, be they 18 or 28.

    This kind of thinking belittles real problems fresh recruits and young men are having - which have absolutely nothing to do with immaturity. Our glorious defence force, where the first thing a young soldier learns is how to avoid responsibility and doing stuff, is the bastion of immaturity here.

  86. Larry Thorne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking of Finnish military personnel, how many of you US /.ers knew that Larry Thorne was Finnish?

    1. Re:Larry Thorne by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As well as that some of the people teaching US soldiers to fight in extreme conditions were Finnish. (search: Marttisen miehet from google)

  87. This was on Fark yesterday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell to slashdot so long to copy and follow?

  88. Doonesbury and video game addiction by bremstrong · · Score: 1

    Doonesbury is coincidentally running a video game addiction series. See: http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.ht ml?uc_full_date=20040802 http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.ht ml?uc_full_date=20040803 http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index.ht ml?uc_full_date=20040804

  89. Doonesbury by bremstrong · · Score: 1

    Doonesbury is coincidentally running a video game addiction series. See:

    http://www.doonesbury.com/strip/dailydose/index. ht ml?uc_full_date=20040802
    http://www.doonesbury.co m/strip/dailydose/index.ht ml?uc_full_date=20040803
    http://www.doonesbury.co m/strip/dailydose/index.ht ml?uc_full_date=20040804

  90. Democracy != capitalism [nt] by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    no text

  91. World Military needs to grow up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the world getting more crowded and the chinese and India wanting to be the new super-power kind on the block (Idia's president (a nuke missle scientist has said that he wants India to develop nanotech wepons for future wars (see www.nanodot.org), the whole world needs to dump the military concept and grow up...I say that all nerds out there in the world should rise up and show all these jock-type military sub-humans that nerds are the higher/smarter life form and net access is leaps and bounds above ignorant military service..if you want the uber-soldier of the future, get the nerds to grow you one in a vat using advanced nanotechnology, just tell the military types and supporters to bugger off (that includes you Bush (and company) and your plan to bring back the draft, if you get re-elected, you ignorant stupid president)

    1. Re:World Military needs to grow up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would help if the nerds would actually out reproduce the idiots. Look at that ugly Lyndie England bitch. She's knocked up already like a good red-neck. I think nerds should start having 6+ kids.

  92. Re:Finnish army needs no nerds like those sent hom by marsu_k · · Score: 1
    Civilian service is for ideological reasons, period. If a person is mentally or physically unfit for the army, they should not serve at all.
    I have to disagree. Although I chose civilian service for ideological reasons, I think cases such as in the article would actually do more good in civilian service. Obviously they can't cope in the army at the moment, and judging by their computer fanatism they aren't in very good physical shape either. Whether their situation will be remedied in a few years I don't know, but I doubt it.

    So instead, why not place them in front of a computer (preferably with a limited, monitored net connection ;-) and let them do work? Civilian servicemen are free employees, whereas training a solider costs quite a bit. In Germany, where a more significant portion of the population opts for civilian service (not German myself so I don't have the exact figures), servicemen are quite valued because of the work they do.

    Besides, civilian service means seven extra months not studying properly, and having to endure the social stigma.
    Depends. I've had some friend succesfully study in open university at the same time, and not all service jobs are nine-to-five. It really depends on the job. As for the social stigma, IMHO it doesn't exist anymore. While it is true that some decades ago military service was nearly mandatory for high paying/excecutive jobs, society has changed ever since. Sure, the rednecks still exist, they're a global phenomenon. If you spend time with them I doubt you'd even concider anything else than the army. But most people are quite liberal nowadays.
  93. Addiction isn't ALWAYS bad it can be GOOD by OrangeTwitch · · Score: 1

    Addiction is not being able to stop doing something even if you want to. This dosn't have to be bad. It could be in a good way. What if a doctor was addicted to saving lives? Would you deem him as having something wrong that needs to be fixed? Of course not! Addiction can be good also.

    1. Re:Addiction isn't ALWAYS bad it can be GOOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Babylon 5, the station's doctor was addicted to saving lives. He used drugs to stay awake so he could always operate, but then started making big mistakes. In the end even that addiction was a bad one.

      -Kelju Ivan

    2. Re:Addiction isn't ALWAYS bad it can be GOOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Addiction is defined by bad conquinces.

  94. Net addiction? by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1

    I guess any country that gave birth to Linus Torvalds deserves a little leeway in issues relating to technology. I'm guessing, though, that in a few years they'll start declaring folks with internet addiction to be valuable to national security, and suddenly people will go from being rejected internet junkies to officers in the electronic warfare department.

    --

    *****
    Dear Mary,
    I yearn for you tragically,
    A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

  95. The only reason you should need... by BillGodfrey · · Score: 1
    "I don't want to join the army."

    Unfortunately, some people seem to think they know better. Those people are morons.

  96. Not just Bush by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    America is hated for its arrogance and its selfishness.

    Thanks to organized farm lobbies in the western countries (and probably concerns of strategic resources), there have been set up trade barriers that limit importing food from developing countries, while our subsidized produce is being exported to those countries. Not only do we refuse to buy their goods, but we export subsidized produce to them that thanks to those subsidies is cheaper than their domestic wares. Why do they put up with it? Since the alternative is even worse - not being able to export anything to the Western countries.

    Basically, we cannot be expected to be loved when we actively make life hard for poor people in the above described fashion..

    Oh - and exporting western culture into societies where decency is still a virtue is not a good idea either, that tends to rub people in power the wrong way..

    Basically, if America and the West want to be loved, we need to see things their way too and come up with compromises where both sides make sacrifices..

    --

    Stop the brainwash

    1. Re:Not just Bush by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      I do see the reason why western countries protect their farming industry. It's nothing less than a matter of national security. If the world were plunged into some sort of third world war, then food production would be even equally as important as it was in WWII.

    2. Re:Not just Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs farming when we have Solient Green?

    3. Re:Not just Bush by Dogtanian · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Let's also consider this, however; Jerry Pournelle (Byte)- I believe it was- pointed out the problem with outsourcing America's production of important stuff to countries like China.

      I think he also used the example of production in Europe (e.g. what if production of XYZ is against a European law that says you can't produce XYZ if it is used for immoral purposes), but frankly, China is the main issue here, as they are far more likely to be America's enemies in a war, and they produce a mind-boggling quantity of.... everything, basically.

      Now, if there was a problem with China, what sort of situation would America be in? Food is important, sure, but it's not the only consideration.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:Not just Bush by RWerp · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Eliminating world povery is also a matter of national security.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    5. Re:Not just Bush by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      Eliminating world povery is also a matter of national security.

      Our "War on Poverty" in the US has had little success eliminating poverty in our own backyard... that said, American poverty is very different than poverty in a third world nation. The amazing thing is the attitude that prevails:

      * Free Trade costs the US jobs!
      * Free Trade SUXORS for the third world (no it doesn't! you can't go from hunter/gatherer economy to $20K/year avg income overnight, free trade is fairly intollerant of corruption and graft, too)
      * The family farm must be protected! (this is a code for "we must subsidize our farmers so food is produced here"
      * My god, we are sending our best jobs to Mexico/India/Singapore/etc...

      What people fail to grasp is that people outside of Europe and North America have the same needs that we do. When NAFTA drove jobs to Mexico, it started a 100 year cycle where the worker in Mexico is in higher demand, will gain escalating skills and ultimately will see wages ballance with the industrialized world. It's just so easy to forget that those poor people in _________ country are people no different than you and I - they just were not fortunate enough to be born where opportunity exist.

      I do believe, though that the solution to poverty is not debt. Taking a nation and making it pay 30% of the gdp to service loans is a sure way to cause poverty.

      --
      -- $G
    6. Re:Not just Bush by dfenstrate · · Score: 1

      America is hated for its arrogance and its selfishness... if America and the West want to be loved...

      I'm an American, and although I hardly support everything my government does, I don't see the point in 'being loved.'

      Really, what fucking good would that do us? Are we in some kind of international popularity contest?

      We should obviously keep on good terms with nations that share our values (ie, nations that are true allies and are of genuine use to us, and we to them), but for those who don't, why should we give a rat's ass if they like us or not?

      France, for example, doesn't share our values at all, and make a point of supporting the opposite of whatever America's position is, just to try to take us down a notch. No principals except to oppose America. None.

      Why should we give a fuck what they think?

      Iran's mullah's think we're the great Satan and we should all die or submit to allah. Why the fuck would we ever think we could get those guys to love us? Why would we want to?

      I could go on, but I'll just quote Machiavelli:
      ('fear' can also be read as 'respect')

      Upon this a question arises: whether it is better to be loved than feared or feared than loved? It may be answered that one should wish to be both, but, because it is difficult to unite them in one person, it is much safer to be feared than loved, when, of the two, either must be dispensed with. Because this is to be asserted in general of men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you successed they are yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life, and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you. And that prince who, relying entirely on their promises, has neglected other precautions, is ruined; because friendships that are obtained by payments, and not by nobility or greatness of mind, may indeed be earned, but they are not secured, and in time of need cannot be relied upon; and men have less scruple in offending one who is beloved than one who is feared, for love is preserved by the link of obligation which, owing to the baseness of men, is broken at every opportunity for their advantage; but fear preserved you by a dread of punishment which never fails.

      Nevertheless a prince ought to inspire fear in such a way that, if he does not win love, he avoids hatred; because he can endure very well being feared whilst he is not hated, which will always be as long as he abstains from the property of his citizens and subjects and from their women.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    7. Re:Not just Bush by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Taking a nation and making it pay 30% of the gdp to service loans is a sure way to cause poverty.

      Yes. What's more, sudden influx of capital into a thirld world country can be detrimental for it. The reason is, governments in such countries are prone to spend the loans on capital-intensive investments, which do not create jobs and do not bring people out of poverty. With less money, the can create more jobs because they have to make labour-intensive investments.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    8. Re:Not just Bush by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 0, Troll

      You keep on the good side of people/countries to keep your enemies numbered. If keeping them happy means significant sacrifices, consider carefully if the price of one less enemy is worth the sacrifice.

      Remember, you're occupying a country of camel-fuckers, and that alone is tying up your resources - and not going so well either.

      Sure Machiavelli had some smart things to say, but be careful in following blindly anything - and especially if it's five hundred odd years old and was not written in an environment with a sole superpower.

      Besides, "share our values" and Machiavelli are incompatible in very fundamental ways. Machiavelli was all about realpolitik and manipulation. And how do you know what allies are "true allies and are of genuine use to us"? Machiavelli is very specific about that in your quote.

      Anyhow, do yourself a favor - live overseas for a year or so. You might learn a few things, and your arguments will carry more weight whatever you learn.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    9. Re:Not just Bush by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      I'm an American, and although I hardly support everything my government does, I don't see the point in 'being loved.'

      It's pretty much related to 'not being blown up so often'.

      Iran's mullah's think we're the great Satan and we should all die or submit to allah. Why the fuck would we ever think we could get those guys to love us? Why would we want to?

      The mullahs are only as powerful as how much the people respect them. The more they will dislike you, the more likely they are to trust them and their Satan stuff instead of you.

    10. Re:Not just Bush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      America is hated for its arrogance and its selfishness.

      Selfishness?? Fine, we'll see how your country does without the US protecting it's borders and providing finanical aid. The US spends BILLIONS on defending other countries and giving away money that everyone knows will never be paid back by the freeloaders.

      America doesn't want to be loved. Most Americans don't give a shit about the rest of the world and would just as soon cut off all aid and spend the money and resources at home.

    11. Re:Not just Bush by Fareq · · Score: 1

      You are right, excepting the costs of corruption.

      If Mexico's government remains as completely corrupt as it is, there is little hope that the population will be able to follow that nice upward spiral -- the government could simply steal all of the gains.

      As it stands, most of the "economic growth" in Mexico is the shipping of money (usually physical bills -- US paper currency) from immigrants (legal and otherwise) to family in Mexico.

      However, a more educated populace *is* more likely to demand (and get) a less corrupt leadership.

      ---

      As for ancestor's whine about Bush... STFU! you have no idea what you are talking about... recall Clinton's firing cruise missiles on Iraq? Remember why that happened? (Other than the Monica Lewinsky thing... there actually was a second reason). Fact check before you post that kind of drivel, eh?

      Thanks
      </RANT>

      -- Fareq

  97. Russia by fantomas · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure anybody has any ill will towards Finland today (except maybe Bill Gates, grin!). But the Finns have a history of their big neighbours visiting quite regularly.... (Russia, Sweden...)

    1. Re:Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good ol' Sweden, we haven't seen them here for some 195 years...

  98. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by jaakkeli · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Finnish performance in WW2 was mainly due to four factors.... I don't think that the "quality of the soldiers" was that much different.

    Actually, the quality of soldiers was different, or rather the quality of the leadership. The Finns still had a lot of officers who had training and field experience from the old Imperial Russian army, but on the Russian side that talent had all been lost in the revolution, and even after that Stalin's purges had taken a heavy toll on the Red Army. Stalinism massively hurt almost everything important to any Soviet efforts, from science to the military, when the political leadership interfered with everything and replaced competent people with idiots that made bigger promises.

    And...

    Four, defending your homeland gives you some extra boost compared to simply invading some other country.

    The Soviets had also expected there to be a lot of Finnish communists who would defect and greet the Red Army as some great liberator, but there weren't because the Soviets had already killed them. There had been a lot of communists in Finland, but most of them had moved to the Soviet Union (this was not a big deal for a Finnish communist: there were a lot of ethnic Finns living in the Soviet Union, so it was just the border between a capitalist bourgeois democracy and the great socialist wonderland) and the paranoid Soviets had, of course, executed almost all of them as spies or unreliables. (The rumors that not all was well in the wonderland then, naturally, contributed a lot to the Finnish will to fight; for the Finns, it was not just Finland that was at stake, but the fate of Finns as a people.)

    Totalitarianism has a real habit of working against itself...

  99. Re:Finnish army needs no nerds like those sent hom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Finnish civilian service shouldn't be 13 months of a cool job learning comp skills or just hanging around in a library, taking somebody else's real job away.

    It should be 6 months cleaning public toilets, underground stations, and the like.

    I did the army, and I actually understand and respect poeple who don't do that for ideological reasons. Socially, the latter is the harder way to go...

    But I hate the way the service is implemented -- currently, my own job opportunies are suffering from the fatct that these no-pay guys who couldn't care less about the job are filling up the places nevertheless. (Yeah, hence this rant.)

  100. what a joke by metalmario · · Score: 1

    finnish army, i mean. was there for nine months. complete waste of my time.

    1. Re:what a joke by MarkoP · · Score: 1

      I served 11 months.

      It wasn't really best time of my life, but you can do it, if you will.

      Of course, there is an option always - you can serve this time in jail (and this is not even a joke.)

      / Marko P

    2. Re:what a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, there is an option always - you can serve this time in jail (and this is not even a joke.)

      Not really, I have to correct this misunderstanding. Civil service is a real option, too. 13 months wiping asses in the kindergarten, programming at the university or something else useful. You go to jail only if you do not want to go to the civil service either.

  101. disability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Hm..where can I apply for disability..."

    umm, in Finland?

  102. Mandatory Full Metal Jacket Reference by fuzzybunny · · Score: 2, Funny

    COWBOY: Tough break for Hand Job. He was all set to get shipped out on a medical.
    JOKER: What was the matter with him?
    COWBOY: He was jerkin' off ten times a day.
    EIGHTBALL: It's no shit. At least ten times a day.
    COWBOY: Last week he was sent down to Da Nang to see the Navy head shrinker, and the crazy fucker starts jerking off in the waiting room. Instant Section Eight. He was just waiting for his papers to clear division.

    So, I guess the "net addiction" excuse isn't bad, comparatively, considering it cost me about 400 bucks in shrink's fees to get out of the Swiss army (like about 30% of their recruits every year, incidentally.)

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  103. Only on /. by sh0dan · · Score: 1

    could parent be modded "Funny".

  104. Especially with all the F1 and WRC races in the US by sideshow · · Score: 1

    Kind of hard to believe huh?

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

  105. addiction by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Informative

    Technically, a person can become addicted to anything.

    There are two kinds of addiction. One is psychological, and the other is physiological. In other words, you can have a direct mental (emotional, whatever) dependence on something, or your body can be dependant on something. Sometimes a psychological addiction can cause physical withdrawl symptoms, too, and just because you're psychologically addicted doesn't mean there isn't a physical side effect/benefit.

    People allow addictions to continue in their lives because they're an escape from the mundane details and unpleasant things about life that they don't like. Caffine, the Internet, sex, routine, alcohol, spending money, being dumb, smoking, singleness - people get addicted to all these things, because they help the person avoid having to think about the real issues of life.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  106. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
    The Finns also had their fair share of heros and one guy who can arguably claim the title of "Best Sniper Ever".


    Yep. 542 confirmed kills in 105 days...
    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  107. The story of my life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mother was one of those few 27-year-old Finns who hadn't done a suicide yet. Her alcohol problems were severe though and she died a day after I was born. My father already had blown his tiny brains out when he heard that my mother was pregnant. So had my grandparents blown their brains out right before they both killed a few million Russians in Winter War with their bare hands only. The nurse gave me snow to eat. Santa Claus gave me rocks.

    My childhood was quite usual. I had to ski to the nearest school every day for 42 kilometers and 195 meters, even in the summer. One day my big brother was eaten by a pack of wolves and my uncle. Or so they say, because I had too much moonshine to remember. My brother was a Linux kernel tree maintainer.

    At school the teacher was too drunk to taught us anything else but Swedish language, how to make mobile phones, love Lenin and praise the superior education and political system we have here. I designed a few phones, invented WAP and got a job at Nokia sweat shop. I built an igloo to give me shelter from the summer heat waves (-35 C), German tourists and elves.

    I once watched Baywatch and got very horny. I met a reindeer in IRC, dated and finally had a shotgun wedding. The sex life was not good and a decade later the reindeer left me because of a Swedish tennis player called Sven-Göran Svensson. The reindeer got the igloo and the bastard children. In divorce I got nothing but a rope which is too short so that I could hang myself. Please help me!

  108. Finnish army from nerdish viewpoint by jokkebk · · Score: 1

    Being a technical person and having served my 12 months in the Finnish army, I can say that the communications equipment we got to use were pretty interesting.

    I mean, after wireless connectivity using 10-pound radios, sending encrypted text messages using 4 pound special devices and other technology that is rugged enough to survive even if the soldier doesn't, you really start to appreciate your 0.2 pound Nokia cellphone.

    And usually these top-notch behemots ship in these handy 3x3x3 foot boxes you get to carry around in the forest. And don't get me started on the weather! Now wonder these younger nerds start to miss internet.

    --
    http://codeandlife.com
  109. This is why the Finnish army isn't really feared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Finland was in a part of the world that was a bit more strategic, or was surrounded by ambitious neighbors, it wouldn't last a year.

    Fortunately, they've got no resource, they're surrounded by neighbors who could care less, and so they're safe.

    For now.

  110. Puh-leeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all Mika Hakkinen quit because he couldn't put up the pressure (typical of the country apparently).

    And all the best talent in the US is going into NASCAR, which I hate, but that's where the money's at.

    And the way things are going, NASCAR is more likely to conquor the world than F1 is likely to conquor the US.

    So get real here.

    1. Re:Puh-leeze by tcr · · Score: 1

      Puh-leeze yourself.

      First of all Mika Hakkinen quit because he couldn't put up the pressure

      Or because he got married, had a kid, and changed his priorities. This is also the guy who was nearly killed after one of the most horrific crashes post-Senna, but I guess you knew that.

      And all the best talent in the US is going into NASCAR, which I hate, but that's where the money's at.

      Are you talking globally? You do know that F1 is only eclipsed by the Olympics and the Word Cup (ie. Football, or what the world outside the US refers to as Football) in terms of TV audience and revenue.

      There's more money in NASCAR?
      Go NASCAR!
      Drive fast, turn left!

      And the way things are going, NASCAR is more likely to conquor the world than F1 is likely to conquor the US.

      See above.

      So get real here.

      No, please - after you.

      --


      Information wants to be beer.
  111. Royal Marines by Crizp · · Score: 1

    The Royal Marines are cool chaps. The base I was stationed at was housing British, Danish, German and American troops for winter training before the big Operation Whatever war game.

    A week after first arriving (flying up half the country), I ended up in the base's hospital due to some crazy violent influenza (along with half the guys that came on the same plane as me) - 39,8C fever, runs and the works. During my two-week stay I made friends with a couple of Royal Marines. Nice folks, but as I said, bonkers. And they don't know how to ski very well :)

    ObWeAreBestBragYouSuck: The local county "guerilla" home defense military "Heimevernet" had such a good combat record that they invited SAS troops to have a go at attacking the base. SAS lost :)

    1. Re:Royal Marines by dave420 · · Score: 1

      But I bet the Americans had the best equipment and the least idea how to use it :-P hehehehe

  112. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems most slashdotters are not equipped with a sense of irony, or even a sense of humor that doesn't revolve around BSODs and Beowulf clusters.

  113. That's why you're weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " It's purpose is not to psychologically damage its recruits."

    Making someone grow up is not damaging them. This type of coddling of your youngsters is perhaps a symptom of why you have such a high suicide rate in Finland. You pamper people so much that it never toughens them to the realities of life.

    God help you if your army ever had to defend your country. The "men" would probably burst into tears.

    1. Re:That's why you're weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good one.
      You almost got me but then I realized that only a finn would speak like that. s/your/our/ next time and I might take the bait.

  114. Defense is about self-preservation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The question is not about who is right but who is left.

  115. Technical Positions by DMNT · · Score: 1

    I know I should have applied to more computer technological department in the FDF, but anyway I conscripted to the Guard Jaeger Regiment (in Finnish). It was in 1999 and even then they had internet connection conscripted could use.

    Later on this year I was lecturing for some conscripted from Defence Forces Education Development Centre, they all had laptops given by the FDF and while I was teaching them I saw at least some of them running irssi thru ssh, the very same method I use to get on IRC when I'm at work. Too bad I wasn't able to see their channels so I couldn't join them later.

    My father had been visiting the Education Development Centre when he worked for the same company that I do and he told me that it seems to be all candy and chocolate compared to normal service in fighting units. Of course if you ask from someone who has already served his 6/8/9/12 months then the service today is no match to the time when the temperature was 20 degrees below absolute zero and Adolf Hitler was a sensitive man compared to the sergeant that one time...

    --
    ?SYNTAX ERROR
  116. Army Officer's comments from Finnish Press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When interviewed one captain explains:
    "Addicted has never been under anybody's command,
    never been woken up at 6 am, has not had any 'limits' whatsoever in his life. When these defects are exposed addicted creates his own versions of symptoms. Doctors then diagnoses these as panic attacks, anxiety disorder or whatever. Addicted:
    - are normally exposed during the first 4 weeks of training.
    - sleep only during days
    - have friends only at internet.
    - have no hobbies
    - do no exercise at spare time
    When addicted is housed with 10 farting guys into a same room it is evitable that shock occurs"
    I agree with the captain, nerds.

  117. Foreign armies adopting the same strategy by tezza · · Score: 2, Funny

    If a foreign Army did this they'd be *cough* Finnished [ducks for cover]

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
  118. Re:Especially with all the F1 and WRC races in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are more F1 races in the US than in Finland.

  119. Re:Finnish army needs no nerds like those sent hom by arose · · Score: 1

    Because it's slavery and sexual discrimination?

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  120. Re:Finnish army needs no nerds like those sent hom by magi · · Score: 1

    First of all, the story is probably just rubbish.

    These appear to be just careless personal opinions given by one redneck army commander. In the interview (as quoted for example in Iltalehti), he uses low-language words such as "dude" (jätkä) and "farting". He also belittles the actual medical statements made by doctors, which are often "panic disorder", "anxiety", etc.

    These clues tell us what this article is probably about: the commander is just an example of people with severe attitude problems in the army. He simply over-generalizes a huge number of problems into a single cause, which he himself probably understands nothing about. Really, why do they let that sort of people even give such public statements?

    Just read the interview and really think about what the commander says. ...unless you share the problem. Calling people "sissies who need to be sent home to grow up" is a typical symptom of such attitude problems.

    It's of course nice that some people have the mentality needed for the army, which requires "taking orders" and "setting limits" (as the commander says). Such mentality might not be ideal or even desired for much (although perhaps some) of the life outside the army.

    But yes, I agree that those people who best fit in the military should go there, and do their job well. And not expect everybody else to be like them.

  121. mod parent up by scavenger87 · · Score: 1

    I wish I has moderating points now.

  122. Application by Dizzle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hm..where can I apply for disability...

    Why, online of course.

    --
    -Dizzle
    "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
  123. Excuse me by hyperherod · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some of these people are likely to be using it just as an excuse, and if they get called back again in a few years they'll use another one until they have a family and then have a valid excuse... I know it's not Finland but I knew a guy from Sweden who got called up for their "compulsory" national service. He said that if you don't want to do it, all you had to do in the interview was say things like "I don't like people" and that they'd let you off, because you wouldn't be suitable in their eyes. So I get the impression it's just a formality thing and as long as not too many people are dodging out they're OK with it. Most people generally DO want to do it, it's not just Army work, it can be as a firefighter and things like that too.

  124. Draft plans by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    Well one would think it was Bush backing the draft, but it is a bit of Subterfuge .
    What is going on is the Democrats put forth the two bills
    to re-instate the draft . Senate Bill s.89 , House Bill H.R. 163 .

    http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:S N0 0089:@@@L&summ2=m&
    http://www.congress.gov/cgi-bi n/bdquery/z?d108:HR0 0163:

    As another subtle bit of subterfuge they like to put Rep in front
    of the authors names, making the less informed think these ppl
    to be evil republicans, but it just means representative .

    If you check their names with their party affiliation you find they are Democrats . So military stupidity is not limited to Republicans .

    The draft is a bad idea . Ppl that do not want to fight make poor soldiers and it usually causes massive unrest . See "Kent State" ...

    You want quality soldiers, pay them decent pay, and do not screw
    them on their benefits like the government does now .

    See "Gulf War Syndrome" and the lies surrounding the hearings ...

    In a perfect world we would not need a military, but if you
    look around you will see we are SOOOO far from perfect that,
    that day is a ways off . Peace is great, but who is buying ???

    India's militarist overtures are geared towards Pakistan in
    my humble opinion . They still follow the principle of
    mutually assured destruction from the US/USSR cold war .

    They need to follow the steps of Reagan and Gorbachev and decide to put the insanity away .

    Even then it is not really over, the US/Russia still have nukes, just ALOT less of them .

    As long as there is Fear, Power, Greed, Hate, Envy, and Nationalism
    there is going to be this militaristic desire for "defense" ,
    or as Fundementalist Muslims feel a new Global religious crusade
    to convert or kill the Infidels in a 25,000 mile, 360 degree
    circumference .

    History shows the horror of war, but nobody has heeded the lesson
    over thousands of years, closest was Tibet, and you see what it got them . The Dalai Lami is homeless more or less .

    Only Ghandi has defeated violence with peace because he understood
    that if you make the situation financial worthless the british will just go away .

    North Korea did not sign for peace, they just have an Armistice .
    Technically, the war never ended . 51 years it has gone on .

    The good news is China is trying to convince North korea to
    embrace the captilism and under cut the US thru manufacturing
    like China is and to win the war financially .
    The bad news is the US will eventually manufacture nothing here
    and after a generation of not doing it, even if we had to we
    would have few ppl that knew how .

    China figured out they could beat us at our own game just like
    the japanese did with their cars for "awhile" til tarrifs slowed
    it abit and US automakers stopped making crap .

    That is why China wanted into the World Trade Org so bad , and
    has been putting on a guise of being a good neighbor . Hide and watch .

    China plans to take Taiwan, and North Korea wants the south section
    for itself, its not a matter of if, but when .
    When the middle east goes full tilt and we are stretched far too
    thin, look for some or all of this to play out .

    Right now the war in Iraq is but a shadow of the killings fields
    of Vietnam, but if we do not get out soon, it will be like that
    or worse, and "some" ppl in Iran hope that happens .

    Peace !!!
    Ex-MislTech

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    1. Re:Draft plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the draft proposal was a very calculated move by the democrats.

      simply put, if there is talk of a draft, there seems to be a need for one. it doesnt matter that was are currently underutilizing the military. that we have enough people to run several more wars.

      but the democrats are trying to scare people in to a 1960's mentality that we are sending our soldiers to die by the thousand. compare the deaths per day from Iraq and Vietnam.

      Every year since before Vietnam, more GI's are killed in car accidents than in war.

      We need a draft due to automobile accidents, not because of combat.

    2. Re:Draft plans by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      The draft is a bad idea . Ppl that do not want to fight make poor soldiers and it usually causes massive unrest .

      Actually, if you're interested in making sure that a government can't use its military against its own populace, then a draft is actually a pretty good idea - when a tyrant orders the troops to fire on their families, they're much more likely to shoot the tyrant instead. If you're interested in egalitarianism, it also forces people together who might otherwise never cross social circles (given that the "upperclass" aren't allowed to shirk their duty).

      Granted, if the military is forced to take _everyone_, instead of just the people who are interested, then they'll end up having to deal with the whole cross-section of competency of the populace (plus the attitudes of most of the people who don't want to be there). That's not good for general efficiency or competency (although if such a force gets involved in a war to defend its homeland, I suspect the attitudes of the soldiers would be a lot more hardcore).

    3. Re:Draft plans by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      Well ur idea has merits, but the rich always look for loopholes,
      dear god look at the tax system .

      If they care that much about paper, odds are they care as much
      about their kids .

      In Vietnam the average age of the combat soldier was 19 .

      Alot of ppl made sure their kids went to college, if you chk
      enrollment prior to the draft, and then after you notice a
      sizable spike .

      I still think forcing ppl to fight, and paying them janitor wages
      to risk their life is poor planning at best .

      Some ppl think if half your forces are looking to dodge the
      fighting , and half are trying to keep them in line you are
      just running in circles .

      I don't know the real quotient or statistics, but I heard that
      from a Commander while I served in the Navy .

      He served in Vietnam .

      Peace,
      Ex-MislTech

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    4. Re:Draft plans by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      I still think forcing ppl to fight, and paying them janitor wages to risk their life is poor planning at best.

      Some ppl think if half your forces are looking to dodge the fighting , and half are trying to keep them in line you are just running in circles .

      Well, that's a lot of the issue - anyone who doesn't feel they have a good reason to be fighting won't want to fight, and probably won't fight very well if you try and force them to.

      I can almost guarantee that if those same people are directly attacked first (ala Pearl Harbor), they'll be a lot more enthusiastic (although not any better trained) about fighting an enemy, especially if they feel like their homes, families & friends are in danger (i.e., they've got no place to run). They are only unenthusiastic if your "leaders" try to use them to do things which they (the soldiers) don't feel are all that important (i.e., more important than their own lives).

      One could argue that this is as it should be - a so-called leader shouldn't be able to send the troops into harm's way unless he/she can absolutely convince most of them that there's a damn good reason for them to risk their lives.

      Granted, to maintain some kind of reasonable competency, you need to have a decent "elite" core of soldiers, whose job is to study & train in warfare. But the bulk of the military should be drawn from the general population, so that they feel empathy for the general population, and can't be used to suppress the general population.

      The current system of volunteer, trained military + barely-trained National Reserves seems to fit this model fairly well, actually. And I have a feeling that those Reservists who don't agree with the reasons for them being sent into harm's way, are going to express their displeasure about it when they get back (if they ever get back).

  125. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bah. At least they love hot young Russian women from which they buy sex for 10-20 euros in the little rural towns lying near to Finno-Russian border.

  126. You do realise... by VendettaMF · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From the USSR's point of view Finland is the gateway/blockade to the entire Nordic penninsula, which is the most obvious staging area for attacks on Britain and North-Western Europe available.

    Additionally, western Norway is the nearest thing the USSR has to a defensible set of seaports usable in the depths of winter.

    If WWIII isn't just an unlimited ICBM exchange (unliklely I know), then Finland is gonna get it in the neck in the first few minutes, purely for blocking the way into Norway and Sweden (or possibly for blocking the way into St Petersburg, it really depends who's on the offensive).

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
    1. Re:You do realise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USSR has

      Psst. It's 2004. "USSR had".

    2. Re:You do realise... by petabyte · · Score: 1

      Well, the USSR no longer exists - you probably mean Russia. I seriously doubt the Russia has any desire to attack Europe but lets look at this.

      The port argument I don't buy. There are Russian Ports in the North like Murmansk. As to "seaports useable in the depths of winter" they're probably better off using the Black Sea and attacking from the Med or sacking the Baltic States. Finland is a NATO country so attacking it would pull in that alliance.
      Attacking the UK would involve an invasion and frankly, there'd be a nuclear exchange before it got that far. If you're going to invade Europe from the North (as there is a western border I really don't see this happening) you're going to have to move troops across the Baltic or North Sea. If there was really a desire to do that I think Russia would invade the Baltic States before they invaded Finland (smaller borders, smaller countries and the USSR subjugated those countries before).

      Frankly, I don't think your scenario would have been played out during the Cold War and I think its even less likely now. Too many nuclear weapons in play and today, too many people with the desire to get rich through trade in the region.

    3. Re:You do realise... by petabyte · · Score: 1

      Quick correction: Finland doesn't appear to be in NATO proper but is in the EAPC and according to the NATO chart has some miliary relationship with the alliance. The Baltic States are also in NATO so attacking them is also bad news.

      And the most basic question: Why would Russia do this?

    4. Re:You do realise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Russia" is just a code word for "Yankee Imperialist Bastards."

    5. Re:You do realise... by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Finland is not a NATO state and is not going to be one. We know for beeter that being a NATO member doesn't protect us at all. US dind't help us during WWII, they joined our enemies against the only ally we had, Germany. Nobody else cared about what would happen to us. Just look at the Baltic.

      It is a very shot trip to Germany from St. Peterburh, if you dont have to figth your way through the baltic sea. Even if the Baltic countries have joined NATO, I doubt that the US would help them a bit when it would be needed, just look at the past(Greece and Turkey).

      What comes to nuclear weapons, a lot of the USSR missiles are now located in other countries than russia(Georgia...).

  127. Not just America, either by philbert26 · · Score: 1
    Thanks to organized farm lobbies in the western countries (and probably concerns of strategic resources), there have been set up trade barriers that limit importing food from developing countries, while our subsidized produce is being exported to those countries. Not only do we refuse to buy their goods, but we export subsidized produce to them that thanks to those subsidies is cheaper than their domestic wares.

    Quite. Organized farm lobbies in "western countries". Not just the USA. If this was the reason the USA is hated, then Europe would be hated equally.

    1. Re:Not just America, either by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well - the European countries contribute quite a lot of aid, plus their policies and international behavior are not quite as openly arrogant.. That, plus Europe being more willing to challenge Israel on their policies and actions, means that the evidence that "Europe is evil" is less convincing than the evidence that "America is evil".

      And - Europe don't export quite as much crap music and crap movies..

      Do as I say: Try to see things their way, don't nitpick and talk about "the reason" - I didn't.

      --

      Stop the brainwash

    2. Re:Not just America, either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And - Europe don't export quite as much crap music and crap movies..

      Europop and eurodance. I rest my case.

  128. Switzerland by rduke15 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Switzerland takes theis to the extreme, actually requiring all their households to have a government issued machine gun.

    No, not all households. Only the active military have their gun (not machine-gun) at home. The peculiarity is that they are "active" until the age of 40 or something, going back to training for about 1 to 3 weeks every year, plus a few Saturdays going to shooting training.

    That, and the finincal cooperation, were the two reasons the Nazis didn't invade.

    I don't believe the miltary had anything to do with Switzerland not being invaded by Germany.
    To put it simply: you don't attack your own bank.

    BTW, the 2 countries which used to be poor and became rich after the World Wars are Switzerland and the US.

    1. Re:Switzerland by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      BTW, the 2 countries which used to be poor and became rich after the World Wars are Switzerland and the US.

      Pre WW, the US wasn't so much "poor" as "isolationist." Just the US's behavior in the world wars (lend/lease et al) is enough to prove that.

    2. Re:Switzerland by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      After WW1, both countries were much better off than before. And it improved even more after WW2.

      It's true that before WW2, they weren't really poor anymore.

    3. Re:Switzerland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BTW, the 2 countries which used to be poor and became rich after the World Wars are Switzerland and the US.
      The United States has always been very well off. It is a land of tremendous natural resources and an entrepreneurial population (you have to be a cut above average to leave your home country for the unknown). One could argue that Germany and Japan have done quite well, even become rich, since the end of WWII. I don't think your factoid is much of a fact.
    4. Re:Switzerland by Tassach · · Score: 1
      WWII brought the US out of the Great Depression by kick-starting the industrial sector. Pre WWII, there were a LOT of factories sitting idle or running at a fraction of capacity. War production opened those factories back up, and forced them to modernize quickly.

      One of the main reason we won WWII was because our factories never got bombed. This allowed us to out-produce the Germans and Japanese -- we were producing ships, tanks, and planes faster than they could blow them up.

      This manufacturing capacity and lack of a need to rebuild bombed-out cities directly led to the US's post-war prosperity, and subsequent rise of consumer culture. The two world wars forced the US to become a global power and destroyed the century old attitude of isolationism as embodied by the Monroe Doctrine.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  129. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by tootlemonde · · Score: 1

    Totalitarianism has a real habit of working against itself...

    How does one account for the popularity and prominence of the Communists in Finland after World War?

    Althought recently in decline, in the last parliamentary elections, the Left Alliance, the successor to the Communist Party, got close to 10% of the vote. It had three members of the cabinets of the recent governments of Paavo Lipponen (1995-2003).

    There have been ample alternatives on the left to a party so closely associated with a foreign invader. I suppose it's possible to get 10% of the voters to support any marginal party but the fact the Communists got positions in the government seems truly strange.

    It seems as likely as Quisling getting a cabinet position in Norway.

  130. Too bad it's not an official diagnosis by DocJohn · · Score: 1

    "Internet addiction" is still not a recognized diagnosis in any part of the world, and certainly not in the U.S. To create a new diagnosis in the mental health field takes usually decades worth of solid research. "Internet addiction" has less than a decade's worth at this point, and only one or two solid studies that point to *something* (but what, exactly, is still not known because of the studies' methodological flaws).

    It's too bad people take this hokum as real. Might as well start having "book addiction" and "TV addiction" and "communication addiction," because any normal activity, done too often, can then be termed an "addiction." For more reading on what's really going on with this diagnosis/disorder, check out my article at:

    http://psychcentral.com/netaddiction/

  131. Sign up another one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol, that self test on the page that had linked to in the post- well...you can sign another addict up :O ;)

    _______________
    Help Desk Software Consultant

  132. Seriously? by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

    You're going to vaporize in a puff of superheated radioactive carbon, calcides, iron and trace minerals, just like everybody else outside cheyenne mountain.

    --
    kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  133. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by Killeri · · Score: 1

    The Finnish communists have never had really good relations with the Soviet communists. This was true both before and after the war. I'm no expert in the Finnish political history but AFAIK the ideology of the Finnish communists was much more socialist inclined than the Soviet one.

    More to the point, the current Finnish Left Wing party is actually entirely socialist, not communist at all. Back in the '80s they could still have been called communists but this hasn't been true for more than a decade.

  134. Internet Addiction?! by ajs318 · · Score: 0

    If you choose to join the army, then you have to put up with the consequences of that decision. If you are not prepared to put up with it, then you probably should never have joined the army in the first place -- or you should have dropped out during the first couple of weeks, while you still can do so with little or no shame. Is Finland at war with anyone? I really hope not, for Finland's sake, if this is the sort of thing that is happening.

    The reality of the situation is that if you join the army, you can expect to get bullied by your "superior" officers {speech marks to indicate that they are just human beings and therefore, not superior to any other human being}, punished for trivial infractions {whether or not your fault} including demonstrating the ability to think for yourself, and -- if your country goes to war -- shot at by the Americans. On the upside, you will have no shortage of opportunities for heavy drinking {no stronger/more enjoyable substances, though} and casual sex; and, in a minority of cases, you might even get to do some of the bullying yourself.

    Hey, maybe we should blame this on films and video games that artificially glamorise the military lifestyle! In ther meantime, if you have more than half a brain, just stay out of the army, mmmkay?

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:Internet Addiction?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Finland had National Service .. so Finns are actually compelled to join up... no volunteering (will only get you into trouble if you do that in the army) I do happen to think if they found people who would prefer to type away at keyboard, and play with their joystick instead of run around with guns learning how to blow stuff up.. then maybe the Finnish Army was pleased to see the back of them! Send those young "men" off to do other volunteer work (care for the elderly.. meals on wheels, encironmental cleanup..)

    2. Re:Internet Addiction?! by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Compelled to join up?! I thought that was against international law, unless a country was actually at war. Beside which, it doesn't work ..... if you only accept people into the army who choose to join, then you have by definition excluded the unwilling -- who can be a huge handicap. A smart person especially, forced into the army against their own will, could be a formidable "enemy within". OK, they'd get court-martialled; but by then it's already too late.

      In a combat situation, which would would you bet on: three up-for-it psychos who are there by choice and loving every minute -- or two dozen kids who all would rather be at home, playing computer games and smoking dope?

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:Internet Addiction?! by BrokenSoldier · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the guy in John Steakley's " Armor". Physicist 'drafted' into the Army in the future. Good read, kind of on par with Forever War and Starship Troopers ( the book).

      --
      If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is.
    4. Re:Internet Addiction?! by BrokenSoldier · · Score: 1

      *// I joined, did the time, got out...some parts I liked, some I hated, but I didnt have to be balls to the wall, all go no quit. It was just like any other job. Some of those ' two dozen kids' grew up before my eyes( I was 24 when I joined, so older than 98 percient of my platoon and co.) and it was cool to see the light come on.//*

      --
      If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is.
    5. Re:Internet Addiction?! by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      I'm from South Korea and there is a mandatory service there. I'm not suprised since the Korean military is pretty shitty and they have to maintain rather a large army for a country that size due to North Korea.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    6. Re:Internet Addiction?! by DylanQuixote · · Score: 1

      yeah, I think the grandparent post is mistaken...

      AFAIK in Finland you can either a) join the army for 6 months, or b) do community service for a year...

    7. Re:Internet Addiction?! by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      To understand the mandatory of Finnish army you would have to konw the history of Finland. Finland has been a battleground of Sweden and Russia for past(almost) thousend years. We konw that we have enemies and we know what we might lose by not having an army. Most of the finnish males are glad to join the army and do their part to support the independancy that we have now.

      I used my time there to join telecommunications sections of army and learned a lot of what I think is important. These game/interned addicts really don't have anything in common with a geek, they are just lazy ass, want it all for free freeks, who know nothing.

      Few years back Amnesty made a report that Finland was using children as soldiers, but it seems that the now you have to be 18 to join army(used to be 17). Now it is pretty much 'optional' to join the army, but anyone who knows who we have as our neighbour knows what needs to be done to have country called Finland.

  135. Useful military stuff I learned from games by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    "But really, what self-respecting Army would pass on a soldier because he spent too much time practicing his BFG9000 skills"

    Ah, forget the BFG. There's more military stuff in these games.

    1. Rocket and grenade jumps. If you don't shoot rockets at your own feet, you're a wuss and will get 0wn3d.

    2. Bunny hopping. Forget that lame myth about taking cover and laying suppression fire. And only crouch or go prone when you aim. Real Men (TM) bunny-hop their way across the battlefield.

    3. For that matter, suppression fire never works. Only headshots work. If you don't have a good headshot lined up, better not shoot at all.

    4. Only sniper rifles win battles. Any automatic weapon has such a horrible spread, that it's useless beyond 50 ft. Even in 3 round bursts. (E.g., forget about using a LSW at the effective range the US army claims. It can't hit the broad side of a barn at a tenth of that range in any "realistic" game.)

    5. Which is just as well, since moving around is just begging to get hit. The way to win a battle is to camp in a dark place with a sniper rifle. Bunny-hop your way to a good camping place ASAP, and stay put there until the battle ends.

    6. No battle ever was won by artillery or tanks. And forget about air support: it's just a bunch of n00bs who camp the airstrip, but none of them can actually fly. They'll just crash back into the ground in 5 seconds flat anyway.

    7. Reload often. In fact, reload after each shot, if you have a chance.

    8. Vehicles are a mixed bag. They are either indestructible, in which case the only way to stop them is to headshot the people using them. Or they can be destroyed with a pistol or SMG too. It just takes longer. Be sure to ask in advance what kind of vehicles you'll be facing.

    9. Memorize the layout of the map. Especially where the medkits, weapon and armour spawn points are. When under fire, run (or better yet: bunny-hop) to the nearest medkit spawn point. Only n00bs get killed because they don't know where the nearest medkit spawn point is.

    10. For that matter, always stay armoured and buffed. A good kevlar vest can stop even a .50 BMG rifle round. So whenever you're not camping, run around between the armour and quad damage spawn points. Remember: not only you'll be protected yourself, you're also denying the enemy the oportunity to pick those armour points for himself.

    11. Enemies always make loud noises when they run. Army boots must have cast iron soles, or something. With a good pair of headphones or a good 7.1 setup you can know in advance where everyone is on the map. Even in the middle of a machinegun fight.

    12. Rifles and such tend to clip through walls and doors. Always be on the lookout for gun barrels and such sticking out of concrete walls. It means someone's on the other side. That may be your only forewarning.

    13. If all else fails, don't sweat death too much. You'll just respawn and go at it again. Worst that can happen is that you have to wait a whole 2 minutes until the current round ends.

    14. Just because you're dead, it doesn't mean you can't still help your team. If the game allows you to move around in "ghost mode", grab Team Speak or the phone and tell your team members where the enemies are.

    15. Anyone who's too good at it, is probably cheating. In fact, I bet the USA used aimbots and wall-hacks in Iraq. If you scream and curse loud enough about it, you can get them banned by the admin. Beats actually trying to shoot them.

    16. If your team is losing, switch teams. It's not your fault that they're a bunch of unskilled n00bs, and you don't want their incompetence to look bad on your score. Always join the winning team.

    Etc.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  136. Classic Finnish military joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the enemy doesn't come from east, it means they're flanking.

  137. a bunch of sissies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GEt out military with lameist excuses possible.

  138. Archive by thebra · · Score: 1

    Just use the internet archive when you come back and you will miss nothing.

  139. Re:asdf first first by Noofta · · Score: 1

    Nope... better luck next time...

  140. United States Military by Firethorn · · Score: 2, Informative

    We're completely volunteer. In order to end up in the military here, you have to take yourself down to a recruiter's office, take a few tests, fill out a bunch of paperwork, and swear the enlistment oath in front of an officer.

    Sure, we have selective service, but that hasn't been activiated since almost the vietnam war, and it isn't likely too.

    Of course, my reaction was, "What, a military without internet access?"
    Why can't they get it during off duty hours?

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:United States Military by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or your dads recruiter buddy could take you out for a fun night on the town after graduation, then you wake up not knowing where you are, with your pants off, and in the army. it happens.

  141. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by jaakkeli · · Score: 1
    How does one account for the popularity and prominence of the Communists in Finland after World War?

    Err... what prominence? The countries where the communists were truly prominent after WWII ended up in the East bloc; Finland didn't.

    Some communists were able to achieve some power immediately after the War with the help of some Soviet meddling, for example through the Allied Control Comission (which in Finland was almost completely made up of Soviet representatives - the other Allies had no demands for Finland), but they never managed to bring Finland to a revolution (and, unlike the communists in some other countries, they had less of an interest in a violent revolution that would've taken Finland into the Soviet Union). Some years after the war it was clear that the communists were no real political power.

    There was, still, a rebound in radical leftism after the Continuation War. It's not so hard to explain at all. For example, most of the Finnish cultural elite had been extremely unhappy about fighting together with the Nazis and when the whole truth about them got out (during war time the anti-Nazi press had been silenced, so people didn't know that much about the Germans), they were absolutely shocked. It's not very surprising that many people felt the need to distance themselves from the Nazis as much as possible, even if it meant getting "closer" to the ideology of Finland's worst enemy.

    Althought recently in decline, in the last parliamentary elections, the Left Alliance, the successor to the Communist Party, got close to 10% of the vote.

    ...whereas the Communist Party got something like 0.7 %. :-)

    The Left Alliance isn't really "the successor to the Communist Party", but a successor to several leftist parties, the Communists being the most radical ones. The most radical parts of the Communist Party refused to join the Left Alliance and set up the Communist Party again (so there isn't a "successor" to it as such, it's just that almost all of the "ex"-communists joined the LA).

    It would be silly to call the Left Alliance people "communists" (but IMHO still not at all silly to call them dumbasses :-)). The actual Communist Party is nothing but a joke today - Donald Duck and the female private organ probably get more votes than the communists.

  142. The Winter War by Scot+Seese · · Score: 2, Informative

    Finns take the defense of their tiny country quite seriously! For those of you who may not remember, a quick refresher on one of history's most forgotten wars- The Winter War, 1939-1940.

    Soviet Russia sent 23 divisions (460,000 troops) and 2,000 tanks into Finland in an act of naked agression, seeking little more than land expansion. They were told not to stop until they reached Sweden. They were so sure of victory that one of their divisions had a military band complete with instruments for their victory performance in Helsinki, after which they would install a puppet government.

    Finland, with a whopping population of 3.6 million, managed to field 160,000 troops.

    The final result:
    -The Soviets suffered 400,000 casualties
    -Stalin suffered a humiliating defeat, and was forced to sign the "Peace Agreement" March 13 1940.

    Finland lost 10% of it's land, but survived as a free independent country. The Soviet army was recalled in defeat, with Stalin nervous about developments elsewhere in Europe as Hitler's war machine spun up.

    To this day, even with Perestroika, Glasnost, and the "collapse" of the Soviet Union, the citizens of the tightly culturally interconnected scandanavian countries (Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Iceland) maintain a deep mistrust of Russia and it's motives for -anything-.

    Do NOT mock the Finish army! ;)

    --
    THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
  143. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by haggar · · Score: 1

    Sure, ignore completely the fact that the Finnish soldiers were specifically *trained* for winter warfare! What is this "Stalin didn't send enough troops to the Finnish front" bullshit? There were almost ten russians to a finn in this conflict (suurin piirtein), so how the heck can you say that Stalin didn't send enough?

    I am not a finn by birth, but dang, I get really riled up when someone tries to minimize the achievement of the finnish soldiers in WWII.
    Expecially because of the fabricated motivations for the russian invasion - but this is another, long story.

    --
    Sigged!
  144. Evading The Issue by Steve+B · · Score: 1

    It looks to me like Finland is trying to finesse the matter by having a draft on paper (because it "egalitarian", or something) but making it easy to avoid (so that you don't have a bunch of shlubs who don't want to be there screwing up the professionalism of the army). I'm reminded of the US "don't ask don't tell" policy.

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  145. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by puslik · · Score: 1

    Also the fact that Finnish troops had submachine guns vs Russian rifles might have been a factor.

  146. Would have thought it an assett by oldstrat · · Score: 1


    Based on this photograph .
    I would have thought -all- members of the finnish army were internet addicts.

  147. they'll be back. by runasand · · Score: 1

    It is said that they have to come back after 3 years. They're supposed to be more mature then.. :-)

    Glad I'm not going into the army.

  148. Yes, more opportunity and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There's more money in NASCAR?"

    For drivers, yes. Sure Honda/Ferrari/BMW et al spend billions on F1. But the drivers themselves, aside from Schumacher, don't make that much.

    Further, there's only slots for about 16 drivers.

    Contrast that with NASCAR, where there's literally hundreds of drivers. And again, if you take away schumacher, there's not that much endorsement money for these guys.

    Plus, 1 race per country (if they're "lucky")? I don't think so.

    I like F1, but the appeal of NASCAR is obvious.

    1. Re:Yes, more opportunity and money by muzthe42nd · · Score: 0

      Plus, 1 race per country (if they're "lucky")? I don't think so

      Actually, Germany has two Grand Prixs, the German Grand Prix, and the European Grand Prix... Seems kinda unfair, but that's life...

      --
      Pfft - Sorry, what?
  149. NO!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A bunch of guys armed with Swiss Army Knives?!?!?!?!?!"

    That's nto allowed. It might get somebody hurt. The army can't go around getting people hurt.

  150. Well I spent 35 years without the internet by RocketSHE · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...prior to 1995.

    --
    ~==>RocketSHE
    1. Re:Well I spent 35 years without the internet by jc42 · · Score: 1

      ...prior to 1995.

      How odd. How did you miss the first couple decades of the Internet's existence? Too bad. You too could now complain about how it has all gone downhill since they let those <gag>commercial</gag> folks online.

      You missed the days when you really could say or put just about anything online without worrying about someone hitting you with a C&D order. And you could help your friends (and enemies) by running an open relay mail server without worrying about the <gag>commercial</gag> folks bringing your tiny server to its knees by using it as a spam relay.

      (And you could tell people that you remember the day when "spam" was an awful, oversalted <gag>commercial</gag> lunch meat product. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  151. one more step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    towards the matrix, the real matrix as in the shadowrun matrix, not some ripped off movie matrix.

  152. Finland, Finland, Finland by pklinken · · Score: 1

    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    The country where I want to be,
    Pony trekking or camping,
    Or just watching TV.
    Finland, Finland, Finland.
    It's the country for me.

    You're so near to Russia,
    So far from Japan,
    Quite a long way from Cairo,
    Lots of miles from Vietnam.

    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    The country where I want to be,
    Eating breakfast or dinner,
    Or snack lunch in the hall.
    Finland, Finland, Finland.
    Finland has it all.

    You're so sadly neglected
    And often ignored,
    A poor second to Belgium,
    When going abroad.

    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    The country where I quite want to be,
    Your mountains so lofty,
    Your treetops so tall.
    Finland, Finland, Finland.
    Finland has it all.

    Finland, Finland, Finland,
    The country where I quite want to be,
    Your mountains so lofty,
    Your treetops so tall.
    Finland, Finland, Finland.
    Finland has it all.

    Finland has it all.

  153. I guess by beforewisdom · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I guess those soilders' military careers are "finnished". Ahem! ;)

  154. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by tootlemonde · · Score: 1

    Err... what prominence?

    According to this site, the Communists were part of the ruling coalition starting in the 1950s and members of the party were in the cabinet from 1966 to 1982, including the Minister of the Interior at one point.

    It's not very surprising that many people felt the need to distance themselves from the Nazis as much as possible, even if it meant getting "closer" to the ideology of Finland's worst enemy.

    If ideology was the issue, the ideology of the Stalinists was hardly an alternative. In addition, during the Cold War, Finland engaged in some fancy diplomacy to fend off Soviet subversion and the threat of a Soviet invasion. It seem unlikely that those threats from allies of the local Communists would have made people more sympathetic.

    It would be silly to call the Left Alliance people "communists"

    According to this site:

    Practically Left Alliance is a follower of the Finnish People's Democratic League, which was an "umbrella party" uniting most of the extreme left. The largest member organization of People's Democratic League, with a share close to 90%, was Communist Party of Finland, which went bankrupt in 1990. Practically all the activities were transferred to the new party.

    In other European democracies, the Social Democrats almost always avoided alliances with the Communists. One would have thought that pattern would have applied even more so in Finland given the Communists' connection to Finland's worst enemy. Instead, one sees the Social Democrats in Finland forming coalitions fairly frequently without being punished by voters in subsequent elections.

    Maybe if one lives in Finland it makes some kind of sense, like the alliance between liberal Republicans in the U.S.A. with white supremists in the South. However, from the outside it is highly incongruous.

  155. Internet access in the Finnish military by Novus · · Score: 1

    Of course, my reaction was, "What, a military without internet access?" Why can't they get it during off duty hours?

    We do, but there aren't enough computers for all of us. With 4 public computers for about 1000 conscripts, we don't get much time each. My 20 minutes are almost up. I guess I'll have to request permission to bring my own laptop and GPRS modem instead. B-)

    1. Re:Internet access in the Finnish military by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      With 4 public computers for about 1000 conscripts, we don't get much time each.

      Sounds like the Finnish military needs to modernize- IP communications + GPS is the key to modern warfare. Forget about Generals merely being in the back of the line on the battlefield- today American generals are running the Iraq war from the comfort of easy chairs in the Operations Center in Tampa, Florida. Within 5 years, every soldier will have his internet-enabled gun- a PDA built into a scope- which not only reports his position back to Tampa for a view of the battlefield, but also enables him to shot around corners in downtown Baghdad (merely disconnect the back of the scope on a cable, stick your gun around the corner, and the digital camera in the front of your scope shows you what's happening around the corner, complete with crosshairs). Orders can come down through the same system completely silently, and a LAN keeps you connected to the other guys in your unit to cut down on friendly fire incidents. A laser range finder allows you to report GPS co-ordinates for precision bombing and missle targets.

      Now if we could only get Bush out of office so that the supply chain can be repaired and we could get bullets to our soldiers in Iraq. Haliburton may have been the right choice for oil fires, but they're horrible at supply from what I hear.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Internet access in the Finnish military by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With 4 public computers for about 1000 conscripts, we don't get much time each.

      Sounds like the Finnish military needs to modernize- IP communications + GPS is the key to modern warfare. Forget about Generals merely being in the back of the line on the battlefield- today American generals are running the Iraq war from the comfort of easy chairs in the Operations Center in Tampa, Florida.


      PUBLIC computers. There's a difference between computers for general use and computers for General use.

    3. Re:Internet access in the Finnish military by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      PUBLIC computers. There's a difference between computers for general use and computers for General use.

      And still a third difference to what I'm talking about- which is a small computer on every soldier and in every vehicle.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  156. Oh, now I get it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Net Addiction' is a euphemism for 'Porn Addiction'

    Ok, got it now, right, man I'm a little slow today...

  157. Mitnick used this as his excuse... by JeffTL · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...to reduce his sentence, as I recall. Back before any judges could tell it's a crock.

  158. in other words... by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

    he's not Finnished yet.

    --
    bp
  159. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Part of that fancy diplomacy, really. The Soviets wouldn't have liked it if the communist party would have been closed down. And the Finnish communist party was truly dangerous only immediately after war when they had lot of Soviet support. There was no communist revolution then, and I don't think that even most communists had any love for Soviet Union. We'll never know whether their leader was a great Finnish patriot or merely incompetent. And since there was no real threat of communist revolution, it was better to have them inside the tent pissing out than having them outside pissing in. Good PR towards USSR, you see.

    It's kind of right now; we have no intention of joining NATO. Not even thinking about it. Honest. Well, the air forces new planes are F/A-18s and pretty much every other weapon system is being made compatible with NATO, but that doesn't mean anything! We are nationally really good at doing one thing and giving the impression of another.

    And I think the Left Alliance has a lot of ex-commies who have given up the commie part and are merely fringe leftists now. I don't associate them with communism myself, but then I don't pay too much attention.

  160. History vindicated this point by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    But mostly, above all, there would be determined finnish army with intention to fight off any invader.

    And, if I recall my history correctly, it took about a million Russian troops to finally capture Finland in the second world war. This was a massive embarassment to Russia, as Finland was/is a small country in terms of population. Their miliary wasn't too impressive based on conventional military standards either.

    I recall I read somewhere that this left an impression on the Nazis, and may have contributed to Hitler's 'Rotten House' theory ("Russia is a rotten house, just kick the door and the whole thing will come crashing down.") that ultimately lead Germany into an unwinnable conflict with Russia.

    Never mess with a Finn ;-)

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:History vindicated this point by manu81 · · Score: 1

      Soviets didn't capture Finland, we were able fend off their huge summer offensive 1944 and even destroy few of their divisions fully. After that Finland had to make peace with Soviet Union, Germany was clearly losing the war. Finland would have no chance whatsoever alone against full might of the Soviet Union. We could make it costly but Finland would've been ruined.

    2. Re:History vindicated this point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You recall mostly correct, but not quite. Russians did not capture Finland during the second world war. Only other non-neutral European country not invaded was Great Britain.

      Finland was a small, poor country and unprepared for war when it broke out, you got that right.

  161. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by bgeer · · Score: 1

    And let's not forget Stalin had purged some 80% of the Soviet officer corps for supposed disloyalty. An army with no leadership just can't deal with a complex tactical situation like that. Luckily (for the USSR) many of them were still alive in Siberian gulags and were restored to their positions when Germany attacked.

  162. Convincing Argument by Psymunn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    US contributes 'quite a lot of aid.' But you are right. There is nothing openly arrogant about anything done in Europe. After all, they are willing to criticise Israel on everything it does but are 'sensitive' enough to turn a blind eye to every other injustice that goes on in the world. The Spanish ellections where influenced by terrorist attacks. France is becoming a scary place to be if you are visibly religious (with both anti religous policy and hate crimes at an all time high). All in all, Europe is looking to become a 'United States of Europe' and I am not convinced that they will flex their power as a superpower any more responsibly then the US did.

    It's almost as if this world we live in has countries that do thigns that are both good and bad. America is a big place. it does a lot of questionable things. it does a lot of bad things. and it does a lot of good things. same can be said of europe. I'm sick of everyone trying to pretend the world is a dicotomy and proclaiming everything evil or good. This isn't starwars. There is no 'good side'

    And europe, like the US, has both some of the best music. And, like the US, Europe has some of the trashiest, cookie cutter music one can imagine.

    --
    The Neo-Bohemian Techno-Socialist
  163. About army in Finland... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The service time is at it's shortest 6 months for crew. For some crew it will be 9(medics) months or 12(drivers) months. For every from corporal() up it will be 12 months.

    Every year about 10 % get sent home to grow up for few years before coming back. Point being that they didn't get off - just delayed.

    Of course true player's got things under control :D - Even though I had to spend 12 months() I managed to spend the last 6 mostly in airconditioned office(5 comps, unlimited web, tv-card, fridge, sauna, gym, billiards table) developing web education and keeping servers running with 2 person crew. So the time off from net was not that long. :D

  164. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by Killeri · · Score: 1

    Well, obviously Stalin did not send enough troops to overrun Finnish defenses before the winter. AFAIK the Soviet army commanders asked for more troops but didn't get the reinforcements he wanted. And IMO had the winter been less severe the winter trained Finnish troops wouldn't have stood a chance against the mechanized Soviet army. Yes, the Finnish troops fought bravely (including both of my grandfathers and presumably both yours) but we were lucky not to lose. Part of that luck was of course the brilliance of the Finnish army in using tactics suitable for the harsh winter.

    But this is just me, I'm just another Finn and definitely no WWII expert.

  165. Obligatory by a10t2 · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, Internet addict YOU!

  166. sickness by broeman · · Score: 1

    I don't much about the Finnish society, but I guess they have the same kind of illnesses for geeks/nerds, as the rest of the Nordic countries (or world?):

    - Internet Addiction, which were compared to Gambling Addiction in Denmark around year 2000 by many scientists. Mostly that people _need_ to check their email before they pursuit their "life". Also gamers have been in target (ofcourse, blame the lamers).

    - "Mousearm", which is a longterm illness, where your lower arm feels swollen up after heavy use. I have the believe though that is because of "wrong use" (most elderly women complains).

    - Lack of D-vitamin, because it is mainly given from the sun (which no geek ever sees ;)

    Most of these illnesses just sound like another way for the medical/ergonomics-companies to make even more money.

    --

    (yes this can be compared with sex)
    1. Re:sickness by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      Lack of D-vitamin, because it is mainly given from the sun (which no geek ever sees ;)

      We a re talking about Finland, there is no sunshine in here. So no matter if you are a geek or not, going out will not help you with seeing sun more than once a year

    2. Re:sickness by broeman · · Score: 1

      thats why Finland is so perfect for geeks anyway ;) I guess it is the long dark evenings that kept Linus working on his nice little project.

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
  167. Can I sue slashdot... by kavau · · Score: 1

    and other websites like stumbleupon etc. for inflicting this horrible illness on me? And not displaying any warning labels? Think about all the productive time I've lost; and how much more money I would make nowadays if I hadn't been fired from two jobs for spending all day browsing...

  168. slashdot addiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word on the street is that /. was actually designed by a team of Addictive Psychology PhD's
    to mesmerize your subconscious in to a slumbering state and thus making your neural tranceptors release some serotonin. The ./ site then utilizes serotonins eyepupil dialating effect to further brain-control the subject by flashing a green color in a frequency that distort the brain's neural pattern, this technique has proven to be 70% effective in rendering captured subject's (read: ./ reader) cerebral cortexes a complete mush within a an average of 200 hours of pressing 'reload' for more stories.

  169. Idiotic Jerk Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Conscription is fine for countries like Finland.

    For assholes countries like Britain a professional army is better. How the fuck is some Brit or American in Iraq actually suppossed to pretend Iraq's antiquated army with no form of force projection is an actual threat to the United States or Great Britain.

    For Finns, knowing they can defend their own country is enough. Conscription works fine for the Israeli Defence Force and other armies, get off your tower.

    1. Re:Idiotic Jerk Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conscription is fine for countries like Finland.

      'Countries that don't like the freedom to choose, put pacifists in jail (hey Gandi you no good lazy bum!) for objecting and who don't think women have any place in the army'.

      You go girl.

      For Finns, knowing they can defend their own country is enough

      Eh, who can they defend it from? Belgium perhaps?

      They have such a small army that even if every man in the country (and it is only men who are conscripted in Finland of course, Israel isn't sexist about it) was pressganged into force they wouldn't have enough of a defense force to make a dent in any professional army.

      Conscription works fine for the Israeli Defence Force and other armies, get off your tower.

      We'll no it doesn't really 'work' does it? I think that's plainly obvious (Big sums of cash from the USA to buy helicopters sure works though). Still at least Israeli actually has a reason - the Palestine conflict. I don't think I'd object to serving if I was Israeli or Palestinian, but Finlands not exactly on anyones 'must have' invade list.

      The only countries it 'works' for are countries at war or poor countries, mostly dictatorships, that cant afford to pay their own army, and who's population is mostly in poverty anyway.

    2. Re:Idiotic Jerk Off by haggar · · Score: 1

      The money Israel gets from the USA must be all spent on armament bought from the USA - it returns home, so to say. Even when there are better Israeli products (this was the case with some fighter planes etc.) for the job, the US-made one has to be taken. But wait, that's not all: the amount of money Israel receives is still less than the combined monies going to egypt, UAE and S.Arabia. Those monies have to be also spent on armament purchased by USA, with some exceptions, like the Abrams tanks co-produced in Egypt (here egypt has an edge, as the Uranium-cladded Abrams are not matched by the Israeli Merkava tank (which is still a very fine machine).

      Note also, that Israel has been attacked several times in the past, by it's Arab neighbors, and even without US help (sometimes very explicit non-help, thanks to Kissinger's illusion that an Israeli defeat ategypt's hands would bring peace to the middle east - luckily, the oldfart was wrong) the IDF managed to defend the country, sometimes gaining vast amounts of land in counter-strike.

      So, my opinion is that the IDF did manage quite well witout the damned US money, and I feel that it still could do that - IF the US didn't give even more money to Israel's traditional enemies. It's all a ploy to keep the region in arms, and American arms at that. Excellent for the US industry.

      Sorry for sounding so cynical, and bitter.

      --
      Sigged!
    3. Re:Idiotic Jerk Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boo Hoo... It is all the Yankee Imperialist Bastards' fault that Israel has problems... Give me a break...

    4. Re:Idiotic Jerk Off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, who can they defend it from? Belgium perhaps?

      We already held back against billion times larger Soviet Union, you know, same folks who'd easily pushed their iron curtain all the way to Channel if it wasn't for US. You'll be hard pressed to find an army, conscript or "professional", that has ever managed as well against so vastly larger opponent.

  170. Switzerland did not get invaded because... by ChocoboKnight · · Score: 1

    Switzerland did not get invaded because of their tunnels. The threathened that if the germans invaded, they would bomb the tunnels, thereby closing the valuable transport lines that pass through Switzerland.

  171. Net Addiction Gets Finnish Soldiers Out Of Army by infiniphonic · · Score: 1

    So they can't go wireless?

    --
    Crisis is the rule, not the exception.
  172. Who is we (Israeli?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you an Israeli?

  173. Boy Scouts by Mr.+Arbusto · · Score: 1

    Seriously, everything you found interesting is covered in basic Boy Scout material minus being a conscript. (Do you get paid?)

    First thing to come to mind

    1. Re:Boy Scouts by Crizp · · Score: 1

      Do you seriously think I get paid? To viral-market the Boy Scouts? I don't.

      Or do you find me stupid for finding such outdoorsy stuff interesting?

      Or am I so tired I read your post completely wrong and should just shut up?

      I think the latter, but I don't know. What did you mean exactly? o_O'

    2. Re:Boy Scouts by Mr.+Arbusto · · Score: 1

      My grasp of written language is not very good.

      The ladder is correct...sort of.

      Outdoor stuff is great and interesting. I just don't see the advantage for forcing everyone to be a conscript unless there is a DIRE need. There are plenty of opportunities to enjoy and learn survival skills and enjoy the harsh, cold outdoors.

      I was also wondering, what the compensation for the required tour of duty is. /me tired too

    3. Re:Boy Scouts by Crizp · · Score: 1

      I agree, in times of peace there's no need for a strong defense. Not that the Norwegian defense is that strong anyways - our main objective, I guess, is to resist until NATO can come to our aid :)

      The compensation is nothing. You get your lousy pay (10$ a day when I was there) and at the end of service you get some cash, for me it was around $1000.

    4. Re:Boy Scouts by Mr.+Arbusto · · Score: 1

      The pay seems...sucky, but I guess the service isn't very long and you get to lea.

      Strong defense is very important, but some of the most powerful militaries in the world are entirley volunteer (The US, UK), but the Largest Militaries in the world are Conscript (China and I think India)

  174. Compared to Norway? by GQuon · · Score: 1
    The system is similar to Norway, so there isn't that much to complain about.
    In Norway the military first-time service is 9-12 months (6 for the Home Guard "minutemen"), and civilian service (working for a kindergarten, a peace organisation, etc.) is 18 months.
    The longer civilian service is not punishment. The extra 6-12 months are served instead of the regular military repetition exercises that you get called in for. And last, but not least, after civil service you won't be forced to defend your country if there's ever a war.

    If you don't want to learn to kill people you can do civil service, do un-armed service in the military, or you can take your chances on
    • faking a mental problem, which will most likely have you called in again later, like in Finland
    • that they have too many people, and won't need you
    • that you can serve a short service and never be called in to repetition


    Finland recently shortened the military first-time service. If the total service was reduced by the same percent, then the civilian service should be shortened accordingly. Except of course, that part of the shortening of Finnish military service is caused by less leave for the soldiers and "more intensive training".
    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    1. Re:Compared to Norway? by Xuri · · Score: 1

      Huh? I(from Norway) completed my civilian service in March this year, after 13 months of "duty" at a local school. Originally it was 14 months, but the service period was recently reduced by a month.

      Where'd you get 18 months from?

      --
      -= Ho Eyo He Hum =-
    2. Re:Compared to Norway? by GQuon · · Score: 1

      You're right, it's 13 months now.

      Where'd you get 18 months from?
      From the law.
      The law sets the service length up to military service period + 180 days at maximum, and allows calling you in for repetition service.

      The implementing rules sets it to military service period + 1 month. And I've never heard about anybody being called in to do civilian service repetition. (In contrast to the Civil Defence people, who get called out from time to time.)

      --
      Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    3. Re:Compared to Norway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Norway has a similar system? I don't see how that should make it all better, except that it's nice to know we're not alone in this :P

      Mental problems usually get people a C classification, relieved of peace time duties, after they first postpone service for two years.

      In Finland the repeat training for soldiers is usually really short, so it doesn't really justify seven months of civil service.

  175. Re:Finnish troops were good in WW2 - pre-Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the recent studies have shown that most young Finnish people would jump to the arms if Finland were invaded
    By the way, do you have any links to these studies, they have been brought up several times in this discussion, but I'm usually not really interested in local news. (English and Finnish articles are both okay.) And then off to quasi-trolling: I'm most certainly not one of the majority, then. I finished my civil service yesterday and I don't consider Finland any more of "my country" as Belarus, Brazil, or Croatia, ie. I couldn't give a damn where I lived.
  176. Finnish Student here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...(shivering) got to get on the internet......cannot hold it anymore....(pleading) have to read slashdot.....gawd..help me...(determination)must get the story of my plight on slashdot....can hear footsteps approaching....must seek salvation.

  177. I'd rather be fishing! by lcsjk · · Score: 1
    I had net addiction long before computers.

    Didn't get me out of the military though. However flat feet got me kicked out.

  178. I am an Internet Addict by Arjuna · · Score: 1

    That was one of the first things my Dr wrote down in her notebook about me. Then again, were I extremely into books she wouldn't have written anything except maybe 'needs more exercise'.
    Oh and um, she thinks I'm posessed by a demon - but she won't write that down cause it wouldn't look good at a medical tribunal :P

  179. lame adictions by nazsco · · Score: 1

    i'm adicted to TV. some hours without it in school is too much for me. That's why i made all those typos

    also, i don't sleep more then a comercial break.

  180. A load of crap by Ja�ana · · Score: 1

    Personally, I might be said to be addicted to the internet since I'm pretty much always on it. On the other hand, that's probably because it's just about the only thing to do around here. When I don't have and internet connection available to me, I find myself actually finding other things to do. And another issue to bring up, the only things I really missed while I was away at bootcamp for 3 months, was my tobacco products and alcohol, while I did really miss my news and whatnot, I didn't have all that much of a problem leaving it behind. It's my opinion that these individuals only wanted to get out of military service, and not spend their year in prison (as is Finnish law, mandatory service, a beautiful thing if you ask me, but Uncle Sam didn't). In my day I've heard some pretty bad excuses to get out of/avoid going into military service, and this is really about one of the crappiest ones yet.

    --

    -- Napalm sticks to kids.

  181. Conscripts vs Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last time I will try to explain:

    For the imperialist armies professionalism is the way to go. Americans soldiers in the Vietnam war started fragging their own officers towards the end of the conflict. Why the fuck should some American be dedicated to risking his life to go to Vietnam to fight the spread of Communism? Why should some American joe conscript die in the deserts of Iraq, a country with no force projection to attack the United States?

    This is why countries like the United Kingdom and the United States must absolutely have conscription, they do not defend their countries they attack other countries to further economic, political and ideological interests. With the 1960s antiwar movement in the United States, conscripts dieing for ideological and political reasons related to foreign policy became unpalatable to the American public.

    1. Re:Conscripts vs Professional by @madeus · · Score: 1

      I would point out that even that doesn't 'keep people honest' (though I wish it did) Germany had conscription, but it didn't stop them starting two World Wars in Europe. But then why should we expect it to - volunteer soldiers have the same level of ethics too, they are normal people just like you and me. There are countless wars started by countries with conscription forces (most countries with conscription are generally dictatorships or less than 'modern democracies' too).

      And it's way off topic, but as much as I dislike lying weasels for heads of state (like Bush and Blair) I see nothing wrong with pushing 'ideological interests' and bringing them to brutal dictatorships responsible for the deaths of over 2 million people (against which, casualties in the conflict in Iraq are incomparable). I'd give my life tomorrow to turn Iran into a state with an elected, secular system of government, or to kick Kim Chong-il out of North Korea and re-unite it with the South.

      I have no interest in bringing 'Christianity' to Muslim states (I'm an Atheist, the lot of them can get stuffed IMO) but secularism, freedom (including the freedom not to fight) and a semblance of democracy I want to bring to the world, yes. That doesn't mean i think all countries should have the same laws or values, if some nations want to outlaw tobacco or alcohol that's fine with me. If they want to instigate life sentences for drug trafficking, or alternatively legalise drugs, that's fine with me too. If they want to treat women as property and stone people to death that's not fine with me, and your too right I want to impose that ethical code.

      I don't think the Finnish system of national service, under-which they would have locked Gandhi up as a criminal, is remotely acceptable. Britain recognised conscientious objectors in the 1600's, for Finland not to recognise such a right in the 21st century is barbaric. It is the only EU-member state with prisoners of conscience (people imprisoned for political views), and there some pretty dubious recent applicants to the EU, but still none of them have prisoners of conscience.

      I think they should reform, or be kicked out of the EU for still having prisoners of conscience, I'm sure it will all end in a Human Rights case and they will change, just like France, Spain, Holland and others have ended national service in the last 10 years (almost half a decade after we ended it in the UK). It's simply inevible as people add up the cost of it, let alone address the human rights issues. Did you know it costs Finland over 2 Million Euro each year to keep these people in Jail too? Even if you don't give a damn about human rights, if you can do the maths you can see it doesn't make sense.

      Oh and did I mention that Jehova's Witnesses are curiously exempt from having to do national service in Finland? They have a powerful lobby group you see.

      Of course, the president has the legal power to excuse all prisoners of conscience from their 6 and 1/2 months of jail time, but she's personally chooses not to. But then, as a women she's never had to do it because they don't conscript women.

      The system stinks and is rotten to the core. It's quite indefensible.

      With the 1960s antiwar movement in the United States, conscripts dieing for ideological and political reasons related to foreign policy became unpalatable to the American public.

      Wrong. People dieing for what they regard as wrong reasons (and in a futile conflict) is unpalatable to the American public, they (like me, and I am not an American) will still strongly support military action for ideological and political reasons if it seems justified. Just like the Americans did in Bosnia, where they stepped in and stopped mass genocide, on another continent thousands of miles away (where there was certainly no 'oil' to 'steal').

      Don't you support that kind of action?

    2. Re:Conscripts vs Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your a troll. Fuck off.

    3. Re:Conscripts vs Professional by Mr+Europe · · Score: 1

      volunteer soldiers have the same level of ethics too, they are normal people just like you and me.

      Such as Lynndie England ? Somehow I think that the weirdest fanatics are always volunteers.

      There are countless wars started by countries with conscription forces

      More than countries with paid forces ? Link maybe?

      I see nothing wrong with pushing 'ideological interests' and bringing them to brutal dictatorships responsible for the deaths of over 2 million people (against which, casualties in the conflict in Iraq are incomparable).

      You say attacking Iraq was The Right Thing ?

      I have no interest in bringing 'Christianity' to Muslim states ...
      Agreed. Our "God" may not be better than theirs.

      That doesn't mean i think all countries should have the same laws or values, if some nations want to outlaw tobacco or alcohol that's fine with me.
      ...
      I don't think the Finnish system of national service, under-which they would have locked Gandhi up as a criminal, is remotely acceptable.


      You don's see any contradiction here ?
      ...If they want to treat women as property and stone people to death that's not fine with me, and your too right I want to impose that ethical code.
      ...

      I think they should reform, or be kicked out of the EU for still having prisoners of conscience, ...


      Stoning women is acceptable, but making army compulsory isn't ?


      The system stinks and is rotten to the core. It's quite indefensible.

      It has been set up through a democratic process and still apparently has majority of Finns on its side.

  182. Idiotic comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off Israel would need US military aid if Jordan and Egypt did not also receive US military aid.

    Conscription works.

  183. I can use this... by SirKron · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, this is my next excuse for jury duty.