Slashdot Mirror


User: stillmatic

stillmatic's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
33
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 33

  1. Re:Life starts at conception on Stem Cells Derived from Human Clones · · Score: 1

    How is this any different than the kind of genetic manipulation that is being performed on non-human species every single day? You still haven't come up with a single arguement as to why cloning is wrong. Cloning != killing embryos. Cloning is totally separate from harvesting the stem cells. Also, those cells will still become parts a human being, the human being that donated their genetic material to form those cells in the first place. It's no different than taking a skin graft. Finally, the law already argues that embryos are not people.

  2. Re:Life starts at conception on Stem Cells Derived from Human Clones · · Score: 1

    Killing embryos, foetus', infants and human beings has nothing to do with cloning.

    Cloning can be performed using nuclear transfer. Which is moving the genetic material from one cell into an egg cell which has had it's genetic material removed.

  3. Re:Lot of testing to be done. on Stem Cells Derived from Human Clones · · Score: 1

    I don't see the Christian right having a lot of influence in South Korea.

  4. Re:Life starts at conception on Stem Cells Derived from Human Clones · · Score: 1

    We need some intelligent argument as to what makes cloning wrong.

  5. Re:Life starts at conception on Stem Cells Derived from Human Clones · · Score: 1

    How is this any different than the food you eat? Why must you kill other life to survive? Because that's the way the system works. A human embryo isn't a conscious person, so it's hardly murder. Also, what makes "human" life more important than other forms of life? Your very existance kills more "life" than you can possibly imagine.

  6. Re:Idea on Canada Task Force Calls For Anti-Spam Law · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There definately are ways of eliminating spam. ISP's just need to wake up to the economic reality that moving spam across their networks is wasting money.

  7. Re:It's a mixed bag on Half-Life 2 - Aftermath · · Score: 1

    Steam will always exist while Valve continues to operate as a company. In 10 years it will cost them almost nothing to continue to authenticate the game and even continue to sell copies of it.

    Worst case scenario, they go under as a company and people will just use programs to fake Steam authentication to run it.

  8. Re:It's a mixed bag on Half-Life 2 - Aftermath · · Score: 1, Troll

    Why can't people face up to the fact that they hate Steam because it makes software piracy much harder?

    Steam wasn't implemented to make patches easier, reduce the cost of distribution or whatever. Steam was created because at one point in the illustrious career of HL, there were more illegal copies of HL running than actual purchased copies.

    Valve doesn't care if you aren't going to buy HL2 because of Steam. They don't care because you probably didn't buy HL either and you aren't an actual consumer.

    BTW, the reason you can play HL2 without a CD now is because they patched it. There was a legal battle between Vivendi and Valve about distribution rights and authentication with Steam. Boxed copies purchased in a store required the CD to play as well as Steam authentication. Copies bought directly from Valve through Steam only required Steam authentication. When all the fighting was settled between Vivendi and Valve, they released a patch removing the CD authentication.