1. In close fights with many objects, your max FPS will drop alot. So having 72 FPS in a perfect condition doesnt mean it will stay there. This means higher FPS is to prefer.
2. The physics in Quake III are based on your FPS. You can't do some of the tricks with a low FPS.
I work as a web developer, I code client- and serverside.
If it wasnt for Internet Explorer I would have abondoned my Win* machine for a long time, but since IE is the most used browser on the WWW I have to stick with it. Some might say get Solaris (cause IE works under Solaris). But that isnt the issue.
Some might say get Opera, it has fully CSS and DHTML support according to W3C. Yes it has, BUT the big but, the most users browsing the web uses IE and IE has its own CSS and DHTML model. Wich always tend to crash Netscape browsers.
Unfortunately I dont see anything that will change that really, IE for a free OS, dont think so.
Only alternative for me is to stick with only server-side programming. But that is to runaway from the problem.
I really hope NS5 and its new rendering engine will change all this. Then I can stick with my FreeBSD and Linux box for good!
The majority of ppl watching porn mvoies are under 18.
Just another trick!
Lost Carrier
Re:Debian + FreeBSD + KDE 2.0 = _the_ desktop box
on
Debian FreeBSD Distro?
·
· Score: 1
Yes sure FreeBSD can run Debian.
And yes sure FreeBSD can run Linux bins. But that isnt what I am looking for, I am looking for native support.
FreeBSD - stable, awesome ip-stack Debian - best linux dist, can run linux bins (of course) natively, has more drivers and more hardware support than FreeBSD
Slashdot Mirror
1. In close fights with many objects, your max FPS will drop alot. So having 72 FPS in a perfect condition doesnt mean it will stay there. This means higher FPS is to prefer.
2. The physics in Quake III are based on your FPS. You can't do some of the tricks with a low FPS.
Lost Carrier
If it wasnt for Internet Explorer I would have abondoned my Win* machine for a long time, but since IE is the most used browser on the WWW I have to stick with it. Some might say get Solaris (cause IE works under Solaris). But that isnt the issue.
Some might say get Opera, it has fully CSS and DHTML support according to W3C. Yes it has, BUT the big but, the most users browsing the web uses IE and IE has its own CSS and DHTML model. Wich always tend to crash Netscape browsers.
Unfortunately I dont see anything that will change that really, IE for a free OS, dont think so.
Only alternative for me is to stick with only server-side programming. But that is to runaway from the problem.
I really hope NS5 and its new rendering engine will change all this. Then I can stick with my FreeBSD and Linux box for good!
Lost Carrier
The majority of ppl watching porn mvoies are under 18.
Just another trick!
Lost Carrier
And yes sure FreeBSD can run Linux bins. But that isnt what I am looking for, I am looking for native support.
FreeBSD - stable, awesome ip-stack
Debian - best linux dist, can run linux bins (of course) natively, has more drivers and more hardware support than FreeBSD
Lost Carrier
Debian is the best linux dist imho.
FreeBSD is the best x86 os imho.
KDE 2.0 looks _very_ promising.
And them together sounds lika a real threat to MS Win* as the desktop alternative.
The 4 s:
Speed, security, stability and style.
Its my lucky day!
Lost Carrier
Hacking originally was smart solutions for problems. (for example the coke-machine trick)
Hacking and entering is when a hacker enters a system, reads and changes data. Ie you hack a website, you dont crack it.
Cracking has always been to crack copy protection. Cracking has nothing to do with hacking.
Lost Carrier
Lost Carrier
Lost Carrier