I broke my back a few years ago and needed to lie flat on my back for three weeks (nurses rolled me onto my side once a day to wash my back). In that time my legs had become about 1/3 thinner. Not that I cared too much - I wasn't paralysed.
If I had chosen not to have surgery, I would have needed to lie on my back for twelve weeks. I was told that it would take about two years to get back to normal strength if I'd gone down that route...
You couldn't pay me enough to be in bed for 90 days.
Slashdot Mirror
The joke flies right over your head at the speed of sound!
I think that should be "ba-boom!" rather than "Woooooooooooooooooooooooooshhhhhh!".I broke my back a few years ago and needed to lie flat on my back for three weeks (nurses rolled me onto my side once a day to wash my back). In that time my legs had become about 1/3 thinner. Not that I cared too much - I wasn't paralysed.
If I had chosen not to have surgery, I would have needed to lie on my back for twelve weeks. I was told that it would take about two years to get back to normal strength if I'd gone down that route...
You couldn't pay me enough to be in bed for 90 days.
I don't use Yahoo on principle
Out of interest, what principle?