I was going to apply to a well-known national recruiting agency. They only accept online applications. They claimed to have a job that suited me very well, so I went ahead.
I always read their terms of use and various agreements. This one was very long and had a link to another page. I read that one, it was long and referred to a hard document, but no one at the company had a copy of that document. To apply for a job, you have to agree to something that you can't read.
In high tech, you can't get around applying online, I've tried. Ok, sometimes I succeed, sometimes not. But in cases like this, I walk away. I'm so tempted to contact the state attourney general, but there is no way I want my name associated with the complaint. Maybe I'm paranoid, but, well heck, yeah, I'm paranoid...
How could you possibly test such a theory? The fields required would destroy any computer or living being within. They already have problems doing MRIs, I can't imagine that much stronger of a field.
1) It assumed that when purchasing a hybrid vehicle, buying a gas vehicle wasn't an option.
If you have to buy a vehicle anyway, and spend the same amount of money on either one, then the calculations of monthly payments are a wash.
2) It assumed the car has no resale value when you get rid of it. He throws in the calculation of a trade in, but that isn't right either. The trade in is part of the value of the other car. Why would a hybrid be a better buy if you trade in a Mercedes vs. a Kia?
Slashdot Mirror
Sorry if this is a dup.
There is a class action suit against Verizon for blocking legit emails. You could get $10 or so, I suspect.
Its ironic that Verizon has been allowed to send notification of this suit via email only. I wonder how many notices have gotten blocked?
Unfortunately, the burdon of proof is on the unemployed person.
I was going to apply to a well-known national recruiting agency. They only accept online applications. They claimed to have a job that suited me very well, so I went ahead.
I always read their terms of use and various agreements. This one was very long and had a link to another page. I read that one, it was long and referred to a hard document, but no one at the company had a copy of that document. To apply for a job, you have to agree to something that you can't read.
In high tech, you can't get around applying online, I've tried. Ok, sometimes I succeed, sometimes not. But in cases like this, I walk away. I'm so tempted to contact the state attourney general, but there is no way I want my name associated with the complaint. Maybe I'm paranoid, but, well heck, yeah, I'm paranoid...
How could you possibly test such a theory? The fields required would destroy any computer or living being within. They already have problems doing MRIs, I can't imagine that much stronger of a field.
The analysis made two striking assumptions.
1) It assumed that when purchasing a hybrid vehicle, buying a gas vehicle wasn't an option.
If you have to buy a vehicle anyway, and spend the same amount of money on either one, then the calculations of monthly payments are a wash.
2) It assumed the car has no resale value when you get rid of it.
He throws in the calculation of a trade in, but that isn't right either. The trade in is part of the value of the other car. Why would a hybrid be a better buy if you trade in a Mercedes vs. a Kia?