A great combo is Linux on the backend and OSX on the user desktop. Even a combination of Linux and OSX (server) on the back is great. This would be a win - win (but not a windows - windows) since the end user gets a great GUI and the same skill set can be used to administer both the desktop and server.
You know the dot com boom is around the corner when the quality of promotional items improves.
When I can stop buying t-shirts and have tech companies hand them to me hand over fist, I know good times are here again.
Slashdot Mirror
I sometimes take manlyca when my stomach is upset.
MS releases a patch and it's news?
The feature set of XP / 2003 does not offer more (for me) than 2000. W2K has all the functionality I need.
On the flip side, there are times when finding a driver for XP or 2003 is as difficult as finding one for my Linux box. (not flamebait; I like Linux)
I can get 8-tracks too?
A great combo is Linux on the backend and OSX on the user desktop. Even a combination of Linux and OSX (server) on the back is great. This would be a win - win (but not a windows - windows) since the end user gets a great GUI and the same skill set can be used to administer both the desktop and server.
You know the dot com boom is around the corner when the quality of promotional items improves. When I can stop buying t-shirts and have tech companies hand them to me hand over fist, I know good times are here again.
Can anyone give me a brief description of pluses and minuses of the CDDL?
But I prefer my distro to come with a "Start" button in the bottom left and a stable version of Solitare.
The latest release for WBEL4 was in May 2005. It is the equivalent of RHEL4.
CentOS also looks like a good alternative.http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/ is the alternate RHEL distro.