Don't worry, in California they let teachers sexually assault your children with sperm cookies and give said teachers retirement packages of money when they get caught. Heck, the California Teachers Association threaten state congress members that tried to make sexual assault against children a mandatory firing event.
Would you be freaked out if I listed the high-value contents of your home, your name, and your address on a map that criminals had ready access to use?
Maybe they don't care within their social group, or their privacy boundary. But I'm fairly sure that anyone that filed an insurance list of possessions would not appreciate that list being broadcast to another group that would generally use it as a vehicle of crime. There is no excuse for posting people's addresses in this manner.
Well, let's see. We have thousands of years of history to base those assumptions on, not the least of which happened on a global scale and is still within living memory. You have absolutely nothing backing your evidence save some pacifist dream that everyone else is paranoid. I think it is fairly clear which one of us would survive any disaster or unconstitutional implementation of government.
Reloads are fast enough. If one of these psychos ever have real training you'll find that limiting them to a.22 long rifle won't change the body count. However, the perps continue to be people acting in a criminal capacity beforehand to obtain the guns, so I'm sure that more laws against legal responsible people will change the actions of sociopaths.
Because over-zealous administrators and government officials that deem it necessary to control every moment of a human being's life could not possibly be the nut in the equation.
Databases an be used by anyone. But I guess it shouldn't matter what information someone collects on you because everyone has only the best intentions in the world.
Ergo, only the Constitutional rights I approve of need protection. The rest of you can die. Funny that you equivocate the right to kill a unborn human with the school's right to track your every movement.
No, actually, you need to rationalize your need for someone to control other people. I'm fairly sure that during the existence of writing and math, required identification has not been a mandate for humanity. Specifically for America, the number one reason that people do not want an identification requirement for voting is to assure no one's voting right is prevented. Having said that, no matter what you believe, you do not own people in this country and they do not have a requirement to adhere to your paradigm.
If you're agreeing, you're being a tool. The tags don't magically fail to work off campus. If I figure out what brand/model of reader or what protocol the tags use, I can read them OFF campus. If I'm not caring about FCC regs, I can greatly extend the range of the reader.
They're pathetically stupid, lying, or worse, both.
To think that it's an empty inflamatory remark without basis is being ignorant.
Bullshit. At worst, it is ill-informed, not perjury. The plaintiff's objection is the ability of school staff to track them. School staff does not have off-site readers. "Perjury" is clearly used here to inflame.
From wikipedia: Perjury, also known as forswearing, is the willful act of swearing a false oath or of falsifying an affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning matters material to a judicial proceeding.[1][A] That is, the witness falsely promises to tell the truth about matters which affect the outcome of the case. For example, it is not considered perjury to lie about one's age unless age is a factor in determining the legal result, such as eligibility for old age retirement benefits.
No, you're the one avoiding the issue. IF they believe what they said is true then they have been trained properly and have no business administrating the entire system. I doubt that, and would lean to being trained to lie in court by district mandate.
No, I'm fairly sure that perjury would be accurate. If you testify to something and it takes a one minute Google search to prove you wrong then you're probably lying. P.S. I wonder if the staff wears the same badges? Would be interesting to see what management has tied to their accounts for retrieval.
Yes, because clearly no one ever stalks students nor gleans their information for anything other than legal purposes. We should put you in charge of bank security, too! Sheesh
And do underestimate the delusions of texas. We are the site of the Waco terrorist religious attack on america back in 1993
Seeing as your quote appears delusional in retrospect, I doubt your input on trusting the state should be considered either. Here (no terrosits attacking America at all amazingly): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_siege
If it's against the law, sure. Don't like it? Change the law. Don't put out a list of undercover cops and endanger their lives and then justify in your narcissistic reality.
No, he was committing treason. Manning is not the law. Manning accepted the oath of enlistment and NDA to gain his access. It is definitely he who committed treason.
Slashdot Mirror
Don't worry, in California they let teachers sexually assault your children with sperm cookies and give said teachers retirement packages of money when they get caught. Heck, the California Teachers Association threaten state congress members that tried to make sexual assault against children a mandatory firing event.
Would you be freaked out if I listed the high-value contents of your home, your name, and your address on a map that criminals had ready access to use?
Maybe they don't care within their social group, or their privacy boundary. But I'm fairly sure that anyone that filed an insurance list of possessions would not appreciate that list being broadcast to another group that would generally use it as a vehicle of crime. There is no excuse for posting people's addresses in this manner.
Apparently not researching facts continues to be the method of choice around here.
Germany (pop. 81.7M) estimates for civilian guns held is around 25,000,000 guns. http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/germany
Netherlands (pop. 16.9M) estimates for civilian guns is around 510,000 guns. http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/netherlands
While not at U.S. ratios, data certainly doesn't reflect the bullshit you're passing.
Well, let's see. We have thousands of years of history to base those assumptions on, not the least of which happened on a global scale and is still within living memory. You have absolutely nothing backing your evidence save some pacifist dream that everyone else is paranoid. I think it is fairly clear which one of us would survive any disaster or unconstitutional implementation of government.
Exactly how was Jesus a pacifist? Within the concept of triune, Jesus exacted plenty of violence.
I guess being responsible in your opinion means one must intuit whenever anyone could possibly commit a crime against you or your property.
Reloads are fast enough. If one of these psychos ever have real training you'll find that limiting them to a .22 long rifle won't change the body count. However, the perps continue to be people acting in a criminal capacity beforehand to obtain the guns, so I'm sure that more laws against legal responsible people will change the actions of sociopaths.
Yep, and we know the track record in educational bastions like California has shown.
Focus on standardized tests may be pushing some teachers to cheat
Because over-zealous administrators and government officials that deem it necessary to control every moment of a human being's life could not possibly be the nut in the equation.
Well said. Sorry points used up yesterday but you deserve some.
RFID readers are pretty inexpensive. Setting up a network for tracking whatever would take the simplest of systems.
http://www.ns-tech.co.uk/blog/2010/02/active-rfid-tracking-system/
Databases an be used by anyone. But I guess it shouldn't matter what information someone collects on you because everyone has only the best intentions in the world.
This depends on if the union believes this will be in its interest.
Don't worry. This will be charged as the cost of order.
Ergo, only the Constitutional rights I approve of need protection. The rest of you can die. Funny that you equivocate the right to kill a unborn human with the school's right to track your every movement.
No, actually, you need to rationalize your need for someone to control other people. I'm fairly sure that during the existence of writing and math, required identification has not been a mandate for humanity. Specifically for America, the number one reason that people do not want an identification requirement for voting is to assure no one's voting right is prevented. Having said that, no matter what you believe, you do not own people in this country and they do not have a requirement to adhere to your paradigm.
If you're agreeing, you're being a tool. The tags don't magically fail to work off campus. If I figure out what brand/model of reader or what protocol the tags use, I can read them OFF campus. If I'm not caring about FCC regs, I can greatly extend the range of the reader.
They're pathetically stupid, lying, or worse, both.
To think that it's an empty inflamatory remark without basis is being ignorant.
Bullshit. At worst, it is ill-informed, not perjury. The plaintiff's objection is the ability of school staff to track them. School staff does not have off-site readers. "Perjury" is clearly used here to inflame.
From wikipedia: Perjury, also known as forswearing, is the willful act of swearing a false oath or of falsifying an affirmation to tell the truth, whether spoken or in writing, concerning matters material to a judicial proceeding.[1][A] That is, the witness falsely promises to tell the truth about matters which affect the outcome of the case. For example, it is not considered perjury to lie about one's age unless age is a factor in determining the legal result, such as eligibility for old age retirement benefits.
No, you're the one avoiding the issue. IF they believe what they said is true then they have been trained properly and have no business administrating the entire system. I doubt that, and would lean to being trained to lie in court by district mandate.
No, I'm fairly sure that perjury would be accurate. If you testify to something and it takes a one minute Google search to prove you wrong then you're probably lying. P.S. I wonder if the staff wears the same badges? Would be interesting to see what management has tied to their accounts for retrieval.
Yes, because clearly no one ever stalks students nor gleans their information for anything other than legal purposes. We should put you in charge of bank security, too! Sheesh
And do underestimate the delusions of texas. We are the site of the Waco terrorist religious attack on america back in 1993
Seeing as your quote appears delusional in retrospect, I doubt your input on trusting the state should be considered either. Here (no terrosits attacking America at all amazingly): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_siege
The millions of Jews gassed and/or worked to death by Germany really could give a fuck less about your father's issues. Fuck you too.
If it's against the law, sure. Don't like it? Change the law. Don't put out a list of undercover cops and endanger their lives and then justify in your narcissistic reality.
No, he was committing treason. Manning is not the law. Manning accepted the oath of enlistment and NDA to gain his access. It is definitely he who committed treason.
You're an idiot. DoD knew about the leaks. WikiLeaks bragged about the leaks. Sheesh.
and there's where you're wrong. He did not go public, did he? He committed treason.