You can be sure that in the 20 years preceding putting it up for auction, it was either photographed or photocopied, or more likely, both.
How does that convey that it occurred? RTFA or not, you're just being an ass for effect. I read the article again and it doesn't reflect what you wish. There's one photo of one page with no intention for more to be digitized. Maybe you can take the Zantac before making things up in the next post.
How does one get access to a private manuscript someone just paid a million dollars for so as to copy it and deflate its collectible value? Hope for philanthropic owners seems a stretch. But I do agree with somehow get a digitization for the world's history.
I find it sad that this history for the world might be buried in some collector's safe instead of in a museum where our world society should be able to appreciate its significance.
Thankfully, American culture is built to combat that problem. A majority of the Armed Forces are common people that have been paid less than dirt, and inspired through nationalism to protect the homeland. Good luck on an elite revolt. People want to live here for a reason. Still scratching my head at what the hell a libertarian extremist is? Does that mean the person really really wants to guarantee your liberty? Sounds pretty good to me.
Wait, if it existed and was private and you said no one would know how does the State Dept. know? Funny, when Secretary Rice was at the State Department I received her official e-mails all the time. But I'm sure somehow you know better...
Rand Paul found out that Hillary Clinton did not know anything about anything, even though she was Secretary of State. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Could you distinctly describe why Clinton is a moderate anything? The only moderate I see in the ring is Rand Paul because he believes in the Constitution as government's leash instead of its golden ticket.
The Clintons openly accept money from countries that murder women for even daring to speak, but Rand Paul is in some "pocket of the corporatocracy" you fail to even describe?
Great! So, whomever you are, just post your contact information so we can have the government submit all FOIA and other inquiries through you since you apparently think that you are the arbiter for whether something used in the conduct of government is pertinent.
Well someone is lying because Secretary Rice only used government e-mail. I worked for her over many parts of her career and she never used private e-mail for communication.
This crime includes making false entries in records or doctoring documents, such as by “cooking the books” of a business to hide illegal activity or avoid taxes or other required payments.
Tampering with evidence also includes destroying or altering documents or things “in contemplation of” an investigation or other proceeding that may occur in the future.
The U.S. government takes tampering with evidence very seriously. A person who is convicted of the crime under federal law may face a prison sentence of not more than 20 years, a fine, or both. (18 U.S.C. 1519.)
That's per e-mail. But only for the little people. Clintons get to break federal law because they care... apparently.
1. Investigation may change if they get some actual evidence from the Executive branch vice stonewalling. But since you seem just fine with American citizens dying for her ineptness, oh well.
I'm thinking we just send her on a permanent speaking tour at her standard $200,000 per and pay off the debt with all those engagements in from of universities and Saudi companies.
Or you can just cut to the chase and elect someone that believes in the Constitution, will stop monitoring all of our citizens, and will fundamentally change the thugs at the IRS into servants. http://randpaul.com/
No, I disagree with you; there are levels of response when you're discussing children that are overboard. If the kid pulls a gun or sells drugs, fine. Using an poorly secured computer system to have a prank is far from gang rape; to whit I'll still tag moronic in statement.
Slashdot Mirror
Deserves a mod point I do not have!
You can be sure that in the 20 years preceding putting it up for auction, it was either photographed or photocopied, or more likely, both.
How does that convey that it occurred? RTFA or not, you're just being an ass for effect. I read the article again and it doesn't reflect what you wish. There's one photo of one page with no intention for more to be digitized. Maybe you can take the Zantac before making things up in the next post.
How could reading the article change reality? If the private owner doesn't digitize it your assumption is still an assumption without evidence.
Yes, circular arguments based upon bias help the argument how?
How does one get access to a private manuscript someone just paid a million dollars for so as to copy it and deflate its collectible value? Hope for philanthropic owners seems a stretch. But I do agree with somehow get a digitization for the world's history.
I find it sad that this history for the world might be buried in some collector's safe instead of in a museum where our world society should be able to appreciate its significance.
Thankfully, American culture is built to combat that problem. A majority of the Armed Forces are common people that have been paid less than dirt, and inspired through nationalism to protect the homeland. Good luck on an elite revolt. People want to live here for a reason. Still scratching my head at what the hell a libertarian extremist is? Does that mean the person really really wants to guarantee your liberty? Sounds pretty good to me.
Wait, if it existed and was private and you said no one would know how does the State Dept. know? Funny, when Secretary Rice was at the State Department I received her official e-mails all the time. But I'm sure somehow you know better...
Rand Paul found out that Hillary Clinton did not know anything about anything, even though she was Secretary of State. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Could you distinctly describe why Clinton is a moderate anything? The only moderate I see in the ring is Rand Paul because he believes in the Constitution as government's leash instead of its golden ticket.
The Clintons openly accept money from countries that murder women for even daring to speak, but Rand Paul is in some "pocket of the corporatocracy" you fail to even describe?
and again, why is something okay if Bush did it? Do congressmen start throwing interns off of bridges to their deaths commemorate Ted Kennedy?
Great! So, whomever you are, just post your contact information so we can have the government submit all FOIA and other inquiries through you since you apparently think that you are the arbiter for whether something used in the conduct of government is pertinent.
The problem with your assertion is there is no way to prove it. That's why the government is supposed to be the oversight and not the law breaker.
and therefore you would not either, other than to make things up to excuse your favorite crime dynasty.
Well someone is lying because Secretary Rice only used government e-mail. I worked for her over many parts of her career and she never used private e-mail for communication.
In as much as he kept signing bills produced from the "Contract with America", he made out fine.
(18 U.S.C. 1519.)
This crime includes making false entries in records or doctoring documents, such as by “cooking the books” of a business to hide illegal activity or avoid taxes or other required payments.
Tampering with evidence also includes destroying or altering documents or things “in contemplation of” an investigation or other proceeding that may occur in the future.
The U.S. government takes tampering with evidence very seriously. A person who is convicted of the crime under federal law may face a prison sentence of not more than 20 years, a fine, or both. (18 U.S.C. 1519.)
That's per e-mail. But only for the little people. Clintons get to break federal law because they care... apparently.
Yes, the Wall Street Journal had an article. There's one helluva bastion for the tired and weak of society. Amazing.
Citation?
1. Investigation may change if they get some actual evidence from the Executive branch vice stonewalling. But since you seem just fine with American citizens dying for her ineptness, oh well.
2. Yes, Bush alone. Kinda like religion. http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/...
3. Hope her husband never rapes one of your relatives. That's at least 20 years of people blaming the victim per rape.
Cruz, Paul, and Walker are political babies compared to Hilary Clinton.
I'm thinking we just send her on a permanent speaking tour at her standard $200,000 per and pay off the debt with all those engagements in from of universities and Saudi companies.
Or you can just cut to the chase and elect someone that believes in the Constitution, will stop monitoring all of our citizens, and will fundamentally change the thugs at the IRS into servants. http://randpaul.com/
If you'd like to recover the e-mails she wrote for the entire life of the server I'd bet you could throw a FOIA request on the Chinese government.
No, I disagree with you; there are levels of response when you're discussing children that are overboard. If the kid pulls a gun or sells drugs, fine. Using an poorly secured computer system to have a prank is far from gang rape; to whit I'll still tag moronic in statement.