It is interesting to see someone state the truth about Separation of church and state since it NEVER appeared in the constitution at any time. EVER.
It was 'FOUND' there in the 1940s by a hateful Klansman on the Court named Justice Hugo Black. This man successfully defended a man who murdered a Catholic priest, and atheists loved it. That is where separation of Church and state came from:the hate-filled mind of a Ku Klux Klansman.
Natural selection only eliminates parts of the gene pool, it does not give anything more than what it already has. THIS is a proven fact.
The same thing does for vestigial organs, thats a LOSS of information and/or organs, not a gain.
Evolution has to rely on mutation, to which most radical mutations are counter-survival. This also is a proven fact.
After more than 30 years of bombarding fruit flies in the lab with radiation and other mutation inducing poisons, all they have been able to come up with is retarded fruit flies. NOt a new species, not a new variation or race, just retarded fruit flies. Maybe after a couple of hundred years of producing retarded fruit flies in the lab they might actually decide that is all they will ever get trying desperately to produce evolution.
Kind of sad, really, like heading east looking for a sunset.
Man have you got it backwards. It might behoove you to know that in fact only 51% of physical scientists believe in evolution. Of the ones that do, very few can explain how it happened since they have never reproduced it in the lab. If the term physical scientist escapes you that means real scientists and not Sociologists or gender studies professors. Just 51%!
Its a crying shame not one evolutionist can demonstrate evolution under any circumstances, test it or otherwise observe it.
Maybe if they did no one would question it.
If science were on the evolutionary side you would not see the howling emotional reactions you got from your statement. When someone can't prove a pet theory of theirs that they have held for years, that they claim is based on science, they go insane. A tiny scratch on their scientifically unprovable dogma about evolution and they know it will evaporate faster than spilled rubbing alcohol.
They're getting really scared now.
It must feel really empty to only believe one thing, supposedly based on science, that never gets challenged. How anyone with any scientific knowledge could believe that everything made itself is beyond amazing, but that pretty much sums up their world view.
Instead of questioning religion why not just present scientific evidence of evolution? If there ever were any there would never be any debate of the topic. The fossil record completely disproves ANY evolutionary process. The cambrian rock strata has more species, fully developed species, than are alive today. The precambrian rock strata has almost none. It demonstrates beyond the shadow of a doubt that life appeared suddenly. The complete chain of intermediate species of all life forms would appear in the fossil record by the millions if not billions if evolution had ever happened. So far NO intermediate species have appeared alive OR in the fossil record. The size of our sun decreases by about 5 feet of nuclear material a day. Go back a few thousand years and the sun is slightly larger, but not enough to be a problem for life. Go back a few hundred thousand years and the sun is so large that the surface of the earth would be hot enough to liquefy iron. Not conducive to life, wouldn't you say? The big problem for anyone believing in evolution isn't religion, but science.
For anyone not understanding the scientific method lets do a quick review. In order for something to be considered real it must be scientifically testable, observable, or proveable. All real things have one of these, usually all 3, but they must at least have 1. Evolution has NONE!
Of course this won't faze the atheist who has latched onto the only religious belief in his life since he does not like the alternative, so he HAS to shout down any opposition. Any real scrutiny or demands for actual scientific proof at any level for evolution and the atheist goes diving under his bed hacking sobs at the fact that in the back of his unscientific mind he has swallowed a lie.
Its no big request at all. Just simply present some actual scientific evidence for evolution and that is it. Should be a cake walk if evolutionary theory had science backing it.
Slashdot Mirror
It is interesting to see someone state the truth about Separation of church and state since it NEVER appeared in the constitution at any time. EVER. It was 'FOUND' there in the 1940s by a hateful Klansman on the Court named Justice Hugo Black. This man successfully defended a man who murdered a Catholic priest, and atheists loved it. That is where separation of Church and state came from:the hate-filled mind of a Ku Klux Klansman.
Natural selection only eliminates parts of the gene pool, it does not give anything more than what it already has. THIS is a proven fact. The same thing does for vestigial organs, thats a LOSS of information and/or organs, not a gain. Evolution has to rely on mutation, to which most radical mutations are counter-survival. This also is a proven fact. After more than 30 years of bombarding fruit flies in the lab with radiation and other mutation inducing poisons, all they have been able to come up with is retarded fruit flies. NOt a new species, not a new variation or race, just retarded fruit flies. Maybe after a couple of hundred years of producing retarded fruit flies in the lab they might actually decide that is all they will ever get trying desperately to produce evolution. Kind of sad, really, like heading east looking for a sunset.
Man have you got it backwards. It might behoove you to know that in fact only 51% of physical scientists believe in evolution. Of the ones that do, very few can explain how it happened since they have never reproduced it in the lab. If the term physical scientist escapes you that means real scientists and not Sociologists or gender studies professors. Just 51%! Its a crying shame not one evolutionist can demonstrate evolution under any circumstances, test it or otherwise observe it. Maybe if they did no one would question it.
If science were on the evolutionary side you would not see the howling emotional reactions you got from your statement. When someone can't prove a pet theory of theirs that they have held for years, that they claim is based on science, they go insane. A tiny scratch on their scientifically unprovable dogma about evolution and they know it will evaporate faster than spilled rubbing alcohol. They're getting really scared now. It must feel really empty to only believe one thing, supposedly based on science, that never gets challenged. How anyone with any scientific knowledge could believe that everything made itself is beyond amazing, but that pretty much sums up their world view.
Instead of questioning religion why not just present scientific evidence of evolution? If there ever were any there would never be any debate of the topic. The fossil record completely disproves ANY evolutionary process. The cambrian rock strata has more species, fully developed species, than are alive today. The precambrian rock strata has almost none. It demonstrates beyond the shadow of a doubt that life appeared suddenly. The complete chain of intermediate species of all life forms would appear in the fossil record by the millions if not billions if evolution had ever happened. So far NO intermediate species have appeared alive OR in the fossil record. The size of our sun decreases by about 5 feet of nuclear material a day. Go back a few thousand years and the sun is slightly larger, but not enough to be a problem for life. Go back a few hundred thousand years and the sun is so large that the surface of the earth would be hot enough to liquefy iron. Not conducive to life, wouldn't you say? The big problem for anyone believing in evolution isn't religion, but science. For anyone not understanding the scientific method lets do a quick review. In order for something to be considered real it must be scientifically testable, observable, or proveable. All real things have one of these, usually all 3, but they must at least have 1. Evolution has NONE! Of course this won't faze the atheist who has latched onto the only religious belief in his life since he does not like the alternative, so he HAS to shout down any opposition. Any real scrutiny or demands for actual scientific proof at any level for evolution and the atheist goes diving under his bed hacking sobs at the fact that in the back of his unscientific mind he has swallowed a lie. Its no big request at all. Just simply present some actual scientific evidence for evolution and that is it. Should be a cake walk if evolutionary theory had science backing it.