A microwave device can be defeated by the good old tinfoil hat - by which I mean wallpapering in foil or otherwise turning the room into a faraday cage.
I'd suggest lining the walls with bags of popcorn. That way you'll know when you're under survellance and have a nice snack readily available.
I'm sure you'll be more than happy to go out with all your tax savings and personally...
Get off the soap box. I believe the man's point was that he prefers to receive his compensation in the form of currency rather than in 'benefits'.
As for your poorly informed point, you seem to confusing libertarians with anarchists. A libertarian believes that there's a proper role for government, but that it must be tempered with restraint because historically the biggest threat to life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness has come from those who would govern and other 'well meaning people'.
I'm not sure if you're a socialist or just plain stupid, but I repeat myself.
How else will I correspond with the man from [insert poor African country here] that just inhereted $45 million dollars and needs me to hold it for him?!
They'll usually tell you that they in general blame unfair trade practices. For example, even with their low labor costs, African farms often have a hard time competing with subsidized US and European ag exports. First world nations do a lot of pretty nasty stuff as far as import regulations go (for example, declaring the Vietnamese catfish as not being a catfish, to subsidize the US catfish industry)
Actually, they'll tell
you that it's the result of the 'help' of the do gooders from orginizations such as the U.N.
Because they *weren't authorized to intervene by the Security Council*. What, are you picturing some huge security council debate over whether cmm.com is typosquatting on cnn.com? We're not talking about troop deployments, we're talking about the internet.
The word impotent comes to mind.
Of course, the fact the U.N. found that their 'peacekeepers' in the Congo had been
raping the women that they were supposedly there to protect really illustrates what a fine orginizations it is.
Or perhaps, the fact that the U.N. appoints countries that are on human rights watchlists to the U.N. Human Rights Councils (fox guarding the hen house ?) makes you believe that U.N. isn't a waste of money ?
Yes, that's precisely what we need... China on the committee that oversees TLDs.
While I completely understand the dislike of the Republicans pushing a National ID through, I can't imagine how you think that the Democrats are the solution to get government out of our lives (see socialized healthcare, government planned retirement program - Social Security, etc). The only party left for those of us that want LESS government involvement in the lives of the average citizen is the Libertarian party http://lp.org/
Slashdot Mirror
A microwave device can be defeated by the good old tinfoil hat - by which I mean wallpapering in foil or otherwise turning the room into a faraday cage.
I'd suggest lining the walls with bags of popcorn. That way you'll know when you're under survellance and have a nice snack readily available.
I'm sure you'll be more than happy to go out with all your tax savings and personally...
/T
Get off the soap box. I believe the man's point was that he prefers to receive his compensation in the form of currency rather than in 'benefits'.
As for your poorly informed point, you seem to confusing libertarians with anarchists. A libertarian believes that there's a proper role for government, but that it must be tempered with restraint because historically the biggest threat to life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness has come from those who would govern and other 'well meaning people'.
I'm not sure if you're a socialist or just plain stupid, but I repeat myself.
How else will I correspond with the man from [insert poor African country here] that just inhereted $45 million dollars and needs me to hold it for him?!
I don't believe stating "this is what the farmer's think" qualifies as 'evidence'. Nice try though.
They'll usually tell you that they in general blame unfair trade practices. For example, even with their low labor costs, African farms often have a hard time competing with subsidized US and European ag exports. First world nations do a lot of pretty nasty stuff as far as import regulations go (for example, declaring the Vietnamese catfish as not being a catfish, to subsidize the US catfish industry)
Actually, they'll tell you that it's the result of the 'help' of the do gooders from orginizations such as the U.N.
Because they *weren't authorized to intervene by the Security Council*. What, are you picturing some huge security council debate over whether cmm.com is typosquatting on cnn.com? We're not talking about troop deployments, we're talking about the internet.
The word impotent comes to mind.
Of course, the fact the U.N. found that their 'peacekeepers' in the Congo had been raping the women that they were supposedly there to protect really illustrates what a fine orginizations it is.
Or perhaps, the fact that the U.N. appoints countries that are on human rights watchlists to the U.N. Human Rights Councils (fox guarding the hen house ?) makes you believe that U.N. isn't a waste of money ?
Yes, that's precisely what we need... China on the committee that oversees TLDs.
On second thought, no thanks.
While I completely understand the dislike of the Republicans pushing a National ID through, I can't imagine how you think that the Democrats are the solution to get government out of our lives (see socialized healthcare, government planned retirement program - Social Security, etc). The only party left for those of us that want LESS government involvement in the lives of the average citizen is the Libertarian party http://lp.org/
Yeah !