Slashdot Mirror


Snooping Through Walls with Microwaves

denis-The-menace writes "According to an article from newscientist, scientists have devised a system to use microwave energy for surveillance. If people are speaking inside the room, any flimsy surface, such as clothing, will be vibrating. This modulates the radio beam reflected from the surface. Although the radio reflection that passes back through the wall is extremely faint, the kind of electronic extraction and signal cleaning tricks used by NASA to decode signals in space can be used to extract speech. Although, I doubt it would work in this room"

217 comments

  1. 1st sign the feds are onto you... by titla1k · · Score: 5, Funny

    is there's a van sitting outside your house, with a whole lot of kitchen appliances pointing at it.

    1. Re:1st sign the feds are onto you... by pilybaby · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...owned by the company

      Flowers
      By
      Irene

    2. Re:1st sign the feds are onto you... by mikeage · · Score: 1

      Or a "Flowers By Irene" van...

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    3. Re:1st sign the feds are onto you... by moviepig.com · · Score: 4, Funny
      If people are speaking [then] clothing... will be vibrating.

      So the hell with eyes... it's actually possible to undress her with your diction...

      --
      Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
    4. Re:1st sign the feds are onto you... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Is it getting warm in here?

    5. Re:1st sign the feds are onto you... by StoryMan · · Score: 1

      So the hell with eyes... it's actually possible to undress her with your diction...

      Yeah, and it's been possible for as long as David Mamet has been writing.

  2. Invest in AA by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I'm going to buy stock in Alcoa Operations...with shenanigans like this going on, they can only increase in value.

    In the meantime, here's some telltale signs you might be under microwave surveillance:
    • You feel slightly warmer than is normal.
    • Your food seems to be cooking itself.
    • Metal objects in your house give off sparks for no good reason.
    • Your coffee remins hot for a very long time.
    • Your beer remains cold for a very short time.
    • All your CDs are covered with tiny cracks and will no longer play.
    • Your house pets smell delicious.

    Watch for these signs and protect your privacy...cause the government certainly isn't going to.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Invest in AA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Aside from the fact that farmers and subsidies have all but shut down Alcoa in the US, Aluminum is a poor choice, and hence wouldn't be used. Lead. That would be the metal of choice. It has properties which make it excellent at sound proofing. Vibrating aluminum would modulate their signal quite nicely.

    2. Re:Invest in AA by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Yah, like they're NOT in on the whole conspiracy!

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:Invest in AA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      You must mean aluminium. That's how it's spelt in the English language. Pronunciation: al-you-min-ee-um.

    4. Re:Invest in AA by MacGod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the plus side, it should automagically explode all the super-evil RFID tracking tags in your razors and potato chip bags and whatnot. It's nice to trade one form of surveillance for another, and this sure would be faster than putting each individual item in the microwave oven one at a time!

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    5. Re:Invest in AA by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1
      About your sig:
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein

      I strongly doubt Einstein ever said that. After all, he was a die-hard realist, which was also the reason why he had big problems with the interpretation of quantum mechanics.
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Invest in AA by mikiN · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is no such thing as the English language. There are, however, at least two widely spoken dialects, both of which use different spellings for the word aluminium.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    7. Re:Invest in AA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The element was discovered by an American who named it Aluminum. The British rejected this and gave it the name Aluminium for their usage (so it would end in "ium" just like HeliUM, LithIUM, BerrylIUM, etc). Aluminum is the standard American spelling. Aluminium is the standard spelling in British Commonwealth countries. While I appreciate the British desire for consistency, the Americans can legitimately argue that the person who discovered it should be able to name it whatever they bloody well want.

      I say this as an Australian.

    8. Re:Invest in AA by mikiN · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In the meantime, here's some telltale signs you might be under microwave surveillance:

      Add to this
      • Your WiFi connection becomes erratic, to the point of being unusable
      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    9. Re:Invest in AA by mikiN · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      post.mod(parent, Redundant)

      => D'uh

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    10. Re:Invest in AA by Mudcathi · · Score: 1

      With the exception of metal objects giving off sparks, all of those telltale signs could also be associated with living in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina passed through (yes, including the delicious housepet, for those poor souls who were stuck in the Superdome!)

      --

      "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

    11. Re:Invest in AA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonetheless, the world is Aluminium.

    12. Re:Invest in AA by manthrax3 · · Score: 1

      Lead is horrible at sound proofing. It would probably be good at microwave proofing, though.

    13. Re:Invest in AA by goosman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      On the contrary lead is excellent at sound proofing. Studios are sometimes built with lead sheathing in the walls. 1/64th sheets are common. Google "lead soundproofing" and you'll get a bunch of info.

    14. Re:Invest in AA by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      I thought it was pronounced "leftenant"

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    15. Re:Invest in AA by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      That's because his quote was intended to convey: "Time is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one."

      To put this into perspective, through relativity he found that "time" does not flow as was so often thought in the past. Rather it is a rather static entity that is described by a higher dimension that we cannot percieve directly. Since we cannot percieve the fourth dimension directly, we instead perceive snapshots of it on a three dimensional plane, thus producing the "illusion" of time.

      Of course, Quantum Mechanics throws a monkey wrench in the whole thing, as it shows that the fourth dimension may be more fluid than Einstein had original predictied. In the same vein, one of the most frustrating things for Einstein was that he couldn't eliminate the possibility of time travel. If time travel were possible (as in having the ability to change events that were already causually experienced) it would completely muck up Einstein's idea of a causual and static timeline. Thus his famous quote: "I, at any rate, am convinced that [God] does not throw dice." (To which Neils Bohr reportedly replied, "Stop telling God what to do with his dice.")

    16. Re:Invest in AA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long before microwave ovens are reclassified as terrorist anti-surveillance weapons, and therefore banned from the market.

      You laugh, but wars (*cough* Gulf War II *cough*) have been started on weaker pretenses.

    17. Re:Invest in AA by Matthaeus · · Score: 1

      Not so...this has happened to me recently. No WI-FI devices will work in my house.

      Since I'm not nearly important enough to be under surveillance by the FBI, I must conclude that, well, I dunno, actually.

      I think I'll stop typing now.

    18. Re:Invest in AA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, according to this http://www.metallurgaluminium.com/ageofaluminium.h tml an american had nothing to do with discovering aluminium, only improving the process of extraction (and that was at the same time as a french man)

    19. Re:Invest in AA by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      [...] as in having the ability to change events that were already causually experienced [...]

      Is that like, "I did it, but no biggie, I'm cool about it"?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    20. Re:Invest in AA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Causually, not casually.

    21. Re:Invest in AA by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Ask Google: "define: causually"; "No definitions were found for causually."

      Ask Google: "define: causally"; "in a causal fashion; "causally efficacious powers" wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn"

      So, to totally ruin the joke for this trolling AC, there is no such word as the word that the OP used. Which is why it was a joke, because the word looks like two other words.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  3. Just Friggin' Great by SecureTheNet · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now, when the NSA spies on me, my wi-fi network will be unable to work due to interference!

    --
    SecureThe.Net - Practical Resources for Securing Systems
    1. Re:Just Friggin' Great by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Maybe the NSA will just use the waves your WLAN sends out anyway. Which has the advantage (to the NSA) that there's no additional wave source which you might be able to detect.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Just Friggin' Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wouldn't work though.. You don't know when the wave was sent and so can't use it as a pingback from the object (and can't measure modulation)

      Especially when routers work in ms not the fractions of a second EM waves take to travel.

    3. Re:Just Friggin' Great by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You can simply measure the direct wave coming from the access point as well. After all, it's not that you get only the reflected wave. As added bonus, any distortion of the signal by going through the wall applies simlarly to both the direct and the reflected wave, therefore allowing you to compensate for that.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  4. oh no by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 5, Funny

    luckily my parents basement has thick walls.

    --
    serenity now!
  5. Makes little difference by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How many criminals protect against laser audio surveillance, where a laser beam is bounced off a window or other rigid surface, and the sound from the room vibrates the surface, wobbling the beam, the wobble being translated into audio by the snooper.

    The laser can be defeated by double glazing (I think), devices to vibrate windows and laser detectors (to tell you if you're being listened to).

    A microwave device can be defeated by the good old tinfoil hat - by which I mean wallpapering in foil or otherwise turning the room into a faraday cage.

    1. Re:Makes little difference by cheekyboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the crims are making 100's of millions, spending 0.01% of counter measures is INSURANCE

      hence, the drug lords of south america spend tonnes of tonnes of cash on goodies.

      The best crims are never found out hence, their success and covertness.

      a) buy gold
      b) hide in 50% legit 5% return businesses
      c) learn sign language
      d) study tonnes of tonnes of history of cold ware espianage
      e) never ever talk , paint a false picture to everyone including your wife/kids
      f) cover tracks and never park anywhere, unless you own the govt, or they owe you billions.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    2. Re:Makes little difference by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I don't know but next time I have an illegal conversation i am going to be playing rap music with a sub woofer cranked all the way up.

      A little bass will go a long way towards destroying whatever signal they think they can get.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Makes little difference by Jetboy01 · · Score: 4, Funny

      With all these new snooping devices being invented, I think it's time someone devised the 'tinfoil flat'.

    4. Re:Makes little difference by Punkrokkr · · Score: 1

      Better get patent on that right away!

      --

      There's no emoticon for what I'm feeling! -- CBG, "The Computer Wore Menace Shoes"
    5. Re:Makes little difference by jolyonr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Therefore anyone listening to rap music must be a criminal!

      Arrest them straight away!

      Jolyon

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    6. Re:Makes little difference by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Funny

      The best crims are never found out hence, their success and covertness.

      a) buy gold
      [..]
      e) never ever talk , paint a false picture to everyone including your wife/kids

      Doesn't that include not discussing it on Slashdot either? Plus, you forgot...

      (g) Don't give away all your secrets.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:Makes little difference by flashdot1234 · · Score: 1

      > A microwave device can be defeated by the good old tinfoil hat - by which I mean wallpapering in foil or otherwise turning the room into a faraday cage.

      Make sure you fasten it properly, then :-)
      If the tinfoil is loose, it too will vibrate, increasing the effect described.
      Tin foil reflects microwaves better than fabric.

    8. Re:Makes little difference by Talas213 · · Score: 5, Funny

      A microwave device can be defeated by the good old tinfoil hat - by which I mean wallpapering in foil or otherwise turning the room into a faraday cage.

      I'd suggest lining the walls with bags of popcorn. That way you'll know when you're under survellance and have a nice snack readily available.

    9. Re:Makes little difference by the_xaqster · · Score: 1

      This is classic! That way you know you are under survellance as your wallpaper explodes!

      I just can't stop laughing at the picture that has conjured up in my head!

      --
      I'm just here to regulate Funkyness
    10. Re:Makes little difference by Stupendoussteve · · Score: 0

      I'm thinking of joining the tinfoil frat (Lambda Lambda Lambda, o' course)

    11. Re:Makes little difference by xaosflux · · Score: 0, Redundant

      a) buy gold
      b) hide in 50% legit 5% return businesses
      c) learn sign language
      d) study tonnes of tonnes of history of cold ware espianage
      e) never ever talk , paint a false picture to everyone including your wife/kids
      f) cover tracks and never park anywhere, unless you own the govt, or they owe you billions.

      Plus, you forgot...

      (g) Don't give away all your secrets.

      But you forgot....

      (h) ???
      (i) Profit!

    12. Re:Makes little difference by baadger · · Score: 1

      Great so when they whop up the knob on their microwave radiator your hair catches fire.

    13. Re:Makes little difference by feldhaus · · Score: 1

      Didn't you see the link in the post?

      http://www.imagireal.com.nyud.net:8090/gallery/foi led

    14. Re:Makes little difference by iphayd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The best criminals get their friends elected President. That way they don't have to acquire money through "illegal" means, they just get it allocated from the government.

    15. Re:Makes little difference by Surt · · Score: 1

      Subterfuge my friend, subterfuge.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    16. Re:Makes little difference by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      "...unless you own the govt, or they owe you billions."

      Somehow I think if the government owes you they might just think that a 50c bullet is a good investment with incredible returns.

      Now if you owe THEM billions they have a really good reason to keep you alive until you pay them off.

      I think it was Donald Trump who one said "If you owe a bank 3 million and you can't pay them they say "You have a problem" but if you owe them 300 million they say "WE have a problem."

      Same thing.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    17. Re:Makes little difference by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      What makes you think he gave away *all* of them? :)

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  6. In analogue phone days by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some associates were spied on by the telephone.

    Just because the receiver was on the cradle didn't mean that the microphone wasn't active.

    The cops played stuff back in interviews/court that was off topic but was the occupants bitching about each other to try and divide and conquer them.

    This was in Leeds, UK.

    I can't remember many more details or find a link. I didn't know them at the time and only heard about it later as a warning.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:In analogue phone days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this sounds far fetched
      even if the exchange can give you the isolated "loop feed" the switch on the appliance[ie off the hook] has to be open surely?
      and it being uk plods.

      okay i suppose bt could have the know how
      the bastards

    2. Re:In analogue phone days by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      I guess they could have lied about the source of the tapes but tapes there were and that was how the cops said they got it.

      AFAIK there are four wires in a POTS phone, two for 48Vdc power (OnHook/OffHook being a switch), two for signal.

      You just need to splice the signal wires in the house's junction box and amplify.

      As you might expect, I'm no expert =)

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    3. Re:In analogue phone days by ettlz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I didn't think that sort of evidence was admissible in a UK court.

    4. Re:In analogue phone days by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Interesting

      MI5 developed this in the 1950s, and called it Special Facilities. All it required at the start was a modification to the phone - a single washer, and the phone could be used as a surveillence device. Later versions enabled activation using high frequency radio waves to activate the telephones microphone and required no modification to the phone itself.

      Survellience was also carried out against embassy cypher machines using unshielded telephone cables picking up eletromagnetic emissions from the cypher machines, in many cases enabling the reading of both the en clair message and the cypher material.

      None of this was admissable in a UK court. Phone tap evidence still isnt.

    5. Re:In analogue phone days by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      It must have been used just in the interviews then

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    6. Re:In analogue phone days by Feyr · · Score: 1

      that's wrong, there's 4 wires in a POTS wire, but only 2 are used. you can leave the other 2 completly unplugged and it doesn't make any difference. the two used differs depending on where you live, red/green for canada/us and yellow/back (i think) for europe

    7. Re:In analogue phone days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 3 wires in a UK phone. The master pair comes in and the 48V DC ringing voltage (not "power") is seperated using a filter giving a 3-wire system inside the house.

    8. Re:In analogue phone days by IIH · · Score: 4, Funny
      I didn't think that sort of evidence was admissible in a UK court.

      Evidence?? Court?? You are running an old version of UK, please upgrade where these bugs have been removed in an effort to improve security.

      --
      Exigo spamos et dona ferentes
    9. Re:In analogue phone days by Random832 · · Score: 1

      ringing voltage is 90V, 'power' 48 in the US.

      --
      We've secretly replaced Slashdot with new Folgers Crystals - let's see if it notices.
    10. Re:In analogue phone days by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      I can't deside wheather this is funny, or just sadly too true. With the prospect of 90 days detention without charge (the equivelant of a 6 month jail sentance*) and ID cards on the horizon I fear the latter


      *No, that's not a typo, just a quirk of the English legal system, people often serve only half to three quaters of their sentance behind bars, the rest is served out in the community on licence.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    11. Re:In analogue phone days by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      That's if they bother arresting you first. Much easier nowadays to just shoot to kill.

    12. Re:In analogue phone days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst job in the world? Brazilian table leg delivery man working in London.

  7. Not new tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't think this a new technology. I think that this is just a new take on a technology that Léon Theremin (inventor of the Theremin instrument) was working on for the KGB in the 50-60s. He was using infrared bounced off of windows to detect conversations inside (or something). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Léon_Theremin

    1. Re:Not new tech by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunetely, he never did get all the bugs out of his device. People always knew they were being listened to when the creepy music started. "Quiet, it's the KGB .. or the Krell."

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Not new tech by barfomar · · Score: 1
      During the Cold War a large wood eagle plaque given by the Russians to the US.

      When they whittled the nose away they found a small thimble like cavity with a metal rod attached. The Russians were aiming very strong microwaves thru the building. Voices in the room would be captured in the cavity thru holes in the beak of the eagle. The vibrations would modulate the rod and the changes be detected on the other side of the building.

    3. Re:Not new tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also seem to recall some funny business with a UN Seal with a tuned resonant cavity that was able to be used as a microphone by bouncing a beam of microwaves from a distance.

      Ah, here it is: http://www.spybusters.com/Great_Seal_Bug.html

    4. Re:Not new tech by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1
      Interesting. My dad was a psychologist and in the '70s he had a grant to study the effects of microwaves on human behavior. He said that at the time, the Russians were beaming microwaves at the US embassy there, but he (and apparently the American government) didn't know what they were trying to do. They just ended up deflecting it with tinfoil or something (maybe tinfoil hats aren't so crazy!).

      Maybe your story explains it.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
  8. Fluff piece by gtoomey · · Score: 4, Informative
    This "story" is just a reference to a patent application.

    Even at 100GHz, the wavelength of microwaves is 3 mm. But sound waves inside a room would cause a surface to vibrate perhaps 0.001 mm. You cant modulate a 3mm wave to record 0.001 mm changes.

    1. Re:Fluff piece by smchris · · Score: 1

      Doh!! I'm am amateur radio operator. I should have been able to do the math too.

      Yes. The last time I heard this story, I thought they were using a laser beam -- which makes a lot more sense.

    2. Re:Fluff piece by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 4, Interesting
      >"You cant modulate a 3mm wave to record 0.001 mm changes." You're partially correct. It would be difficult to detect the modulations, EXCEPT that if you're also the sender of the original signal, you can mix the incoming and outgoing signals and extract the phase difference. Subtraction is a VERY powerful signal-extraction method!

      There's an anecdote in the engineering field: where some poor sods at Racal-Dana had a phase detector at 50MHz that was so sensitive to vibration they had to stop their experiments whenever a plane took off from Orange County Airport (quite a few miles away). They eventually had to get special thick aluminum wall castings to enclose the phase detector to block the vibrations. And this was at just 50MHz. Phase detectors get more sensitive proportional to operating frequency, so a 5,000 MHz phase detector is *mighty* sensitive!

    3. Re:Fluff piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.001mm at 3mm wawelength is 0.12degrees phase change. Now check the instruments sensitivity.

    4. Re:Fluff piece by unoengborg · · Score: 1

      Water is used as reflector for dipol antennas at sea (you only need the upper half of the antenna).
      Wouldn't that mean that you should be able to see humans (made of 80% water) inside buildings by using radar/microwave technology. If that was possible, perhaps you could use lip reading, to see what people are saying. Lips ar much bigger than 3mm.

      --
      God is REAL! Unless explicitly declared INTEGER
    5. Re:Fluff piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about just looking at the phase change of the reflected signal? Like the RADAR guns used for traffic speed enforcement?

    6. Re:Fluff piece by pz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even at 100GHz, the wavelength of microwaves is 3 mm. But sound waves inside a room would cause a surface to vibrate perhaps 0.001 mm. You cant modulate a 3mm wave to record 0.001 mm changes.

      Interference detectors, more commonly known as interferometers, can detect distances far below the wavelength used to make the measurements. For example, 800 nm infrared laser light can readily be used to resolve 5 nm differences (I've worked on the development of such a system). Further, the distances being considered for measuring the movement of things like clothing or the throat and chest of the speaker are far above one micron (0.001 mm): put your finger on your throat and speak; think that's one micron you're feeling?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    7. Re:Fluff piece by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      Another important part is the signal processing software.

      SETI has developed some *damn* impressive software in their search for a signal at intersteller distances. I remember one talk I went to 6 or 7 years ago. The woman was describing the setup, and said that they used (I think it was) one of the Pioneer crafts as a basic check to make sure the software was turned on and working. This thing is a 4 watt source out past Jupiter - that's a christmas tree light halfway across the solar system. The signal from it was so loud, no one in the audience could miss it.

      Nowadays, you don't need a good signal-to-noise ratio to be able to pick up stuff, at least if you've got enough processing power. And I'm sure the FBI has plenty of processing power.

      The really scary thing about this new toy is how regularly the FBI flaunts their power, even with everything they got from the PATRIOT act. (http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/10/25/2fbi.surveillan ce/index.html?section=cnn_latest) God only knows what they listen in on "just to make sure it was turned on".

      --LWM

    8. Re:Fluff piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There's an anecdote in the engineering field: where some poor sods at Racal-Dana had a phase detector at 50MHz that was so sensitive to vibration they had to stop their experiments whenever a plane took off from Orange County Airport (quite a few miles away). They eventually had to get special thick aluminum wall castings to enclose the phase detector to block the vibrations.

      That anecdote is most certainly false. First, the phase detector merely responds to the difference in phase between two signals. Any vibrations will have negligible effect on the phase difference.

      Second, encasing the circuit in a heavy aluminum block will not have any effect on vibrations. They will still pass through the aluminum. In order to provide isolation, the circuit has to be mounted on vibration isolators, such as used for old-style turntables, or simple rubber tires.

      Third, the vibration caused by an airplane taking off miles away is much less than ordinary street traffic, or even by people walking around in the building. Again, the vibration won't cause any change in the phase of the incoming signals, and placing the circuit in a aluminum block will have no effect on the output.

      Fourth, the sensitivity of the phase detector is limited by ordinary thermal noise generated in the electronics. This means the circuit most certainly cannot have the sensitivity needed to detect the low level vibrations from an airplane miles away.

      Fifth, I have been developing sensitive phase detectors since 1969, and have received a number of patents in phase detectors and related support circuitry. I can assure you that ordinary system noise makes it impossible to detect vibrations from airplanes taking off miles away.

      So the anecdote is false. Don't believe everything you hear.

      Mike Monett

    9. Re:Fluff piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. It's phase differences that allow the LIGO laser interferometers to measure distance changes to a precision less than the diameter of a proton (despite the wavelength of light being much, much greater than the size of a proton).

    10. Re:Fluff piece by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mike, great post. If you get yourself a /. account, I can add you to my friends list.

  9. It was news... 45 years ago. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Soviet KGB have been doing exactly this since before 1960. Windowpanes make good microwave reflectors. All it takes is a simple microwave source and mixer. Nothing new to see here.

    1. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 1

      That was lasers. Microwaves pass straight through glass.

    2. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Uh, not quite. For many reasons.
      • There were no "lasers" in 1960. At least not the very stable continuous-wave lasers that you need for this, and especially not in the USSR.
      • Think-- do lasers go through glass? Do lasers bounce off glass? Might other wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation act similarly?
      • Microwaves bounce off most anything, if you pick the right angle. Conveniently, most buildings have the windows recessed a bit, and any concave corner makes an EXCELLENT "corner reflector", which has the amazing property of bouncing any incident beam right back to the sender.
      Not only did they bounce microwaves off glass-- they had the hutzpah to give the US ambassador a honorary plaque, which he hung on his office wall. Unbeknownst to us, there was a little diaphragm inside the plaque, just the right wavelength to reflect K-band microwavesm, which vibrated very nicely to every word spoken in his office. Look it up.
    3. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Peter Wright makes a reference to the British version used about 30 years ago.
      It is just called the 'thing'. From the description it is a passive audio sensor
      based on interferometry, but not in the optical wavelengths. If British intelligence had
      the 'thing' working back then I can hardly see how this is news, unless it is the *cough*, er 'official'
      news release.

    4. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      It's not so much the angle, as the polarization. At bruster's angle (around 36 degrees for glass) light polarised in a certain way will all bounce off. Light polarised in the opposite way will all pass through.

    5. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      Methinks you're looking at it kinda backwards. Without the correct angle of incidence, you get neither reflection nor polarization. At the correct angle, you get reflection, which just so happens to also be polarized. But the incident polarization cannot *trigger* reflection, no mather what the angle of polarization. Regards!

    6. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by benj_e · · Score: 1

      I agree, seems like a TEMPEST in a teapot to me.

      --
      The Tao that can be spoken is not the one eternal Tao
    7. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by Andrewkov · · Score: 1
      Uh, not quite. For many reasons.

      * There were no "lasers" in 1960. At least not the very stable continuous-wave lasers that you need for this, and especially not in the USSR.

      Why do I think of Doctor Evil and Austin Powers whenever I see the word laser in quotes?

    8. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      haw, haw haw... For those of you not in on the joke, TEMPEST is some military spec for electromagnetic leakage. Just like the Steve Martin machinist's in-crowd joke-- "that's a sprocket, not a socket!" Haw.

    9. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 1
      He-Ne (continuous) lasers were demonstrated in 1960. If Bell Labs could do it, I would expect that Russians could do it. Lev Landau could do almost anything with 1/2 the number of steps of anyone else :-)

      The corner cube idea is brilliant, so thanks for the post. I'm starting to understand why the test of a truely excellent machinist is to make a nearly perfect cube. It means they can work for the spooks making 'innocent' items to the precision needed to turn frames into corner cube reflectors with one face so thin it oscillates.

      --
      Think global, act loco
    10. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by Technician · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not only did they bounce microwaves off glass-- they had the hutzpah to give the US ambassador a honorary plaque, which he hung on his office wall. Unbeknownst to us, there was a little diaphragm inside the plaque, just the right wavelength to reflect K-band microwavesm, which vibrated very nicely to every word spoken in his office. Look it up.

      I looked it up. 330 MHZ is not K-Band microwaves. It's UHF. HF is from 3-30Mhz VHF is from 30-300...

      The bugged seal had a resonant quarterwave antenna tuned to 330 MHZ. This used 1946 technology, not K band microwaves. K band is near 20 GHZ. There wasn't much in the 1 GHZ and up band then. Vacuum tubes just didn't work that high.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    11. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by Mignon · · Score: 1

      It took me a few tries, but I found this excellent site which discusses the plaque story and has lots of links that look quite interesting as well.

    12. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
      >K band is near 20 GHZ. There wasn't much in the 1 GHZ and up band then. Vacuum tubes just didn't work that high.

      You seem to be confusing the years or the technology. By 1960 there were K-band magnetrons and klystrons capable of kilowatts of CW output power.

      And yes, the seal might have been at VHF or UHF frequencies, but that just strengthens my argument-- this is REALLY old news-- It could have been done as early as WW2 !! Regards, A_H

    13. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
      Sarcasm is better when it fits the situation. There are scads of radar images showing very strong reflections from windowsill corners. This is not an arguable phenomenon. In fact the USAF spent many $$$ trying to figure out how to minimize getting these reflections-- they tend to be much stronger than the reflections from more desireable landmarks.

      No great precision is needed, as the surfaces only need be as flat as 1/4 of the wavelength-- several centimeters. And with the transmitters right across the street, no great precision is needed on the angles either.

    14. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1
      Good info, but beware of anything from "Spycatcher". Quite a bit of the info in there is uncorroberated and even plainly incorrect. He writes that he discovered local oscillator emanations in 1960-something and the CIA wasnt aware of it.

      Not so, radio receivers as far back as 1938 were SPECIFICALLY designed with extra care, isolation, and shielding to prevent local oscillator emanations. Navy subs even went to the length of using obsolete but local-oscillator-less TRF radios, just to avoid the slightest possibility of their being detected in this way. As late as 1945 the Navy was stocking obsolete type 26 and type 27 tubes, just for these old but trustworthy radios.

    15. Re:It was news... 45 years ago. by Technician · · Score: 1

      By 1960 there were K-band magnetrons and klystrons capable of kilowatts of CW output power.


      True, but the bugged seal was delivered in the 1940's, not the 1960's.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  10. Tinfoil hats out, team! by victorhooi · · Score: 0
    heya,


    I can just see how this is going to get the already paranoid all aflutter...


    Still, I can definitely see some potential for this. I mean, say, listening to my sister b*tch about me to her friends in her room, or what my parents talk about in the sanctity of their bedroom. Mwahahaha...you shall have no secrets from me, feeble people who trust in walls, cower before my might...


    Also, is it just me, but does the NewScientist site seem to be a bit...slow...*evil grin*...hehe...even the great NS cowers before the might of the barbarian Slashdot hordes.


    cya,
    Victor

    1. Re:Tinfoil hats out, team! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're really cool, dude.

    2. Re:Tinfoil hats out, team! by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 1

      Sister and parents? What's wrong with a glass pressed against the wall?

    3. Re:Tinfoil hats out, team! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Hey now that stuff is very important to a 10 year old.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Tinfoil hats out, team! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tinfoil is an excellent reflector. Therefore I'm sure tinfoil hats will actually help the snooper by creating much better signals.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  11. How long? by xor.pt · · Score: 3, Funny

    How long till they incorporate this feature into an iPod?

    1. Re:How long? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Or how long until the RIAA uses it to find out which music you hear, so they can charge you on it?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using keystroke sound recording and transmitting device in your iPod, I read your post before you hit submit. I hope my boss doesn't find out I've been spying on slashd
      [LOST CARRIER]

  12. Food fun by Snamh+Da+Ean · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man, I knew that burrito I put in the microwave last night when I came home from a party was speaking to me...

    1. Re:Food fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I knew that burrito I put in the microwave last night when I came home from a party was speaking to me...

      If not, I'll bet it was speaking loudly this morning.

  13. This isnt new by MrEcho.net · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This tech has been around for a very long time, just not in the public sector.

    If you look at any high security building(NSA, etc) they will have multi layers on the outside and inside of the buildings.

    Not only is it physical security, but sound and wireless security.

  14. foil vibrates too by dwater · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wouldn't the sound in the room vibrate the foil on the wall? Said foil would reflect microwaves very nicely, I suspect...

    --
    Max.
    1. Re:foil vibrates too by polysylabic+psudonym · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're right. The foil will have to be glued to the wall sheeting, egg cartons to the foil, another layer of foil over the egg cartons.

      Let 'em try then!

    2. Re:foil vibrates too by dwater · · Score: 1

      It'd be easier just not to say anything, don't you think?

      Without the foil....I wonder what happens when you turn on the microwave oven. Do they get deafened?

      --
      Max.
    3. Re:foil vibrates too by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      If you'll allow me to adapt a popular urban legend for this particular scenario...

      American scientists spent millions of dollars on producing wall surface coverings that would absorb any voice vibrations in order to counter microwave listening devices.

      Russian scientists used a pencil.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    4. Re:foil vibrates too by KitesWorld · · Score: 1

      A little late reading this. Sorry.

      The best way of dealing with this kind of thing would be to have a layer of foil underneath a layer of soundproofing - such as a vaccum between two airtight panes with tweeters or noisemakers at the contact points. Sound cannot reach the foil if there is no physical contact between the inside of the room and the foil wrap.

      An alternative would be to blow pressurised steam through wall cavities - water reflects microwaves pretty damned well, and the movement would drown out the conversation.

      Neither's exactly cheap, but they should both work.

  15. Foiled .... but what happened to by cell servide?? by Totally_Lost · · Score: 1

    Actually ... just the several inch leads on light fixtures and other electrical devices can become bi-directional antennas for the determined. You pretty much have to make the screen room such that power is completely issolated, and other other connections to the world severed.

  16. Microwave Eavesdropping by hardburlyboogerman · · Score: 2, Funny

    My preference to microwaves transmitted in order to invade my privacy is to send hot lead back,at high speed

    --
    Geek Hillbilly
    1. Re:Microwave Eavesdropping by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Someone I know once told me a highly entertaining story about someone who got a 1 watt radar experimenter's license from the FCC and proceeded to build a repeater and drive around frying radar guns. Supposedly they eventually caught him but the FCC came and testified on his behalf because he had a license, and radar guns are unlicensed. No idea if there is any truth to this, or not.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  17. Very dangerous!!! by elgatozorbas · · Score: 3, Informative

    The summary mentioned microwave ovens, so some may be tempted to play around with a DIY radar. Don't!!! Of all domectic appliances a microwave is about the most dangerous to take apart. The RF radiation has a very high power and is invisible. When exposed to the electromagnetic field, currents start to flow inside the human body (mostly close to the skin) giving rise to burn-like wounds. Especially the risk of eye injury is significant. Don't try this at home.

    1. Re:Very dangerous!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. Guess I'll wait and do it on the bus to work.

  18. I can see the RIAA using it!! by AnonymousYellowBelly · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, they listen to the music playing inside your house. Say you are hearing the latest hit from Britney Spears but the RIAA has no record of you buying it, well they turn the 'volume' to 11 on their microwave emitter and fry your balls, burn your house and kill your dog. Justice has been served, right?

    --
    Disclosure: I'm stupid
    1. Re:I can see the RIAA using it!! by Elaarni · · Score: 1

      Someone mod the above poster "redundant" Playing Britney would already have all of the listed effects.

    2. Re:I can see the RIAA using it!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only 11? My amp goes up to 40! Monday night my toddler started playing with it, cranked it to 13. He clapped his hands over his ears and cried for 10 minutes.

  19. Tinfoil hats by Jerom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Funny thing is, with this kind of device tinfoil hats will actually improve "the black suits" reception, since tinfoil easily vibrates and reflects radiowaves really well.

    *Sigh* what now?

    J.

    1. Re:Tinfoil hats by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You have to use a material which absorbs the microwaves. Water should be a good absorber, therefore prepare to live in a gigantic aquarium ... which has the added advantage that it will also protect you from neutron bombs :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  20. Coral Cache sucks by pugdk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Could we like.. stop the idiotic use of Coral cache links?

    Not everyone and their mother has a firewall that can connect outbound to port 8090. Now get coral cache running on port 80 and it would be no problem.. but posting links with port 8090 is just.. lame. No, I can't correct this problem myself as I am not a system administrator at this place, nor is the blocking of anything besides a few ports ever going to go away in this place.

    I suspect I'm not the only one annoyed by those links.. *grumbles*

    -pug

    1. Re:Coral Cache sucks by J0nne · · Score: 1

      Just truncate the nyud.net:8090 part from the link, and reload.

      And be happy that the site you're trying to reach isn't slashdotted for once.

    2. Re:Coral Cache sucks by bellers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While annoying to a small number of people who can't connect to them, the coralcache links are vastly better than the alternative of slashdotting a site that cannot handle the load of a million nerds with refresh buttons.

      When that happens, NO ONE can get to the page, not just those with lame firewalls.

      [ObNerd]
      The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

      --
      This space for rent.
    3. Re:Coral Cache sucks by stupid_is · · Score: 1
      Annoyingly, our Corp firewall redirects to a warning web page with a different address, so it's a case of manually typing it in.

      Maybe someone could do some magic with Greasemonkey to alter these links (IANAGP - Greasmonkey Programmer)

      --
      -- Intelligence is soluble in alcohol
    4. Re:Coral Cache sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      many organisations block all ports because of P2P, so yes coral cache does suck..

  21. Cooked while at home! by Kranfer · · Score: 1

    I can see if now.

    "A local man was cooked alive by the FBI using of all things a Microwave to spy on his Bittorrent and file sharing PC! the man did not realize anything was wrong when he had a craving for his own arm. Local law enforcement were baffled to see that the man in question had eaten his arm to the elbow, and the rest of him seemed to be cooked except for his mid section which was on a rotating glass plate in his living room. A local FBI spokesman said, "We thought using a microwave oven would give us a clear view of the file sharer's life and how he does it!""

    This is of course made up! haha. However using microwaves to peer through walls and see whats going on is kinda nifty. However, I would think it would be dangerous over prolonged exposure, since a microwave does move molecules around to heat stuff up.

    --
    -- Josh
    "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me!" - Pete Conrad
    1. Re:Cooked while at home! by lonasindi · · Score: 1

      A microwave oven uses massively more power than any kind of radio surveilance system would.

      The amount of power going into this proposed system would be more on par with a small radio transmitter, probably no more than a few watts, versus the power output of a microwave which is usually 1000 watts or more. This system would be no more dangerous than the radio stations in your town.

    2. Re:Cooked while at home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you realise that wifi runs at microwave oven frequencies? The difference is 0.1 W vs 800 W
      Stick yourself in front of a FM radio broadcast antenna and you'll realise that there's nothing inherently evil about microwaves. The FM radio will burn you even worse.

  22. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is old news - I remember reading about it a few years ago.

    It's scary technology though; the next house I build is going to have 2" of lead in the walls methinks.

    1. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, what a propagandistic site. "Russia's notoriety for eavesdropping and espionage stretches back even to the czars. [...]" Do they honestly think that the USA are any better? Or is it just that it's OK for us to spy because we're the "good guys" but not for everyone else (because they aren't)?

  23. Foil Room fallacy by obfuscated · · Score: 3, Informative

    The "Foil Room" won't help against snooping as you'd like to believe. (Prepare to ditch all your foil hats!!).

    To truly block signals, you'd need to build a actual Faraday "cage" built with the smallest possible 'holes' so the waves created inside (be it voice, the sound of you typing or even waves emitted by the blinking LED from your Ethernet card) will be cancelled out. This is the same technology that the intelligence agencies employ against counter intelligence. That with foil (which is properly grounded) will work.

    Solid surfaces such as foil can actually act as large AMPLIFIERS if implemented incorrectly since the waves will

    Note that your microwave is surrounded by a Faraday cage to protect you from the rays; not foil.

    A quick Google to back up my post yielded this page discussing similar topics.

    --

    -- dK ... Narf Poit!
    1. Re:Foil Room fallacy by mitcheli · · Score: 0

      "Note that your microwave is surrounded by a Faraday cage to protect you from the rays; not foil."

      So we just need to hide in the Microwave to protect ourselves from the Microwaves? hmm...

      --
      Select from tblFriends where interesting >= 4;
    2. Re:Foil Room fallacy by kebes · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced. Satellite dishes and the lining in your microwave have a bunch of little holes in them as a matter of convenience. Having the holes allows:

      1. To see through the material (to see inside a microwave).
      2. Reduce costs (less material is used, the punched-out metal holes can be melted down and used again).
      3. To let air or water pass through easily (so that water doesn't accumulate inside a satellite dish).

      However, as far as I know, the holes in a faraday cage are not put there to boost performance. (Notice that newer, very small dishes don't have those holes.) Again it is a convenience. The rule of thumb (diffraction limit in optics/E&M) is that the holes must be smaller than the wavelength of EM radiation you are trying to affect. If the holes are that small, then the EM wave "sees" a continuous sheet of conducting material, and can't penetrate. But actually having a continuous sheet of metal would be equivalent, or even better. A sheet with holes in it will have a cut-off frequency where it no longer rejects/reflects EM radiation (when the wavelength reaches the size of the holes). A solid sheet won't have this cutoff. For instance, a solid sheet of metal even prevents visible light from penetrating (you can't see through it), whereas a sheet with holes... well you can (partially) see through it.

      The site you quote is literally entitled " How to Block Microwave Mind-Programming Signals," and I seriously doubt it's credibility. A more lucid page explaining these effects is this one. The Wikipedia article also correctly states:

      Practical Faraday cages can be made of a conducting mesh instead of a solid conductor. However, this reduces the cage's effectiveness as an RF shield.

      For more information, pick up an Electricity & Magnetism textbook. AFAIK, as long as you create a uniform conducting shell, it will reflect all sorts of EM interference, and protect the interior.

    3. Re:Foil Room fallacy by Clod9 · · Score: 1

      We should also note that most of the shielding on a microwave is sheet metal, with no holes. Only the front faceplate has holes, so that you can watch the food boil over onto the turntable.

    4. Re:Foil Room fallacy by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Unless you put something that reflects microwaves into your microwave oven, the holes in the screen over the glass are irrelevant because the microwaves are not pointing in that direction. From the microwaves' point of view, based on the incident angle, that thing is a slightly dimpled sheet of metal. Just commenting, not trying to contradict or anything...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Foil Room fallacy by obfuscated · · Score: 1

      But actually having a continuous sheet of metal would be equivalent, or even better.

      That's true IFF the metal is an unbroken continuous sheet. [consumer] Microwaves don't really have that option because the cost of insuring that it's properly sealed after being opened is a liability.

      The small holes of a Faraday cage will cancel out and reflect back EM waves but a continuous sheet of material will allow the wave to travel over it and it will transfer the wave through the material.

      Sat. dishes that have holes can actually ignore the frequencies cancelled out by the wavelength that is essentially ignored due size of the holes in the dish. This means less of a spectrum of signals to worry about and less noise. Allowing elements to pass through are a definite bonus, but probably not the primary feature of the holes. This is assuming that the size of all the holes on the antenna portion are identical and evenly spaced of course.

      You are correct that the screen in the door of the microwave (allowing light to pass but microwaves to stay inside) is a convenience measure so that we can see our food cook but a cost savings one, I highly doubt. The cost of remanufacturing all those "holes" is most likely more expensive than buying new sheets of metal from a OEM's point of view.

      Also, Faraday cages reduce the need for proper grounding of the conductive plates used as RF shielding. Things like aluminum have to be grounded whereas a F-cage can be free standing.

      --

      -- dK ... Narf Poit!
    6. Re:Foil Room fallacy by WillyMF1 · · Score: 1
      The "Foil Room" won't help against snooping as you'd like to believe. (Prepare to ditch all your foil hats!!).

      Pfft. Tin foil hats are for stopping mind control devices!

  24. Not quite microwave by Ge10 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This has been around for a long time. In the book "Spycatcher" by ex-MI5 agent Peter Wright, he describes a bug used by the KGB to spy on the American ambassador in Hawaii (I think). There was a metal membrane hidden inside a wooden carving, which would passively vibrate with sounds in the room. A strong RF beam of around 900 MHz (details are hazy again, and it's not quite microwave) was directed towards the office from a fair distance away, then the signal would be minutely modulated and reflected by the metal membrane. It was able to work for several years, and this was in the 1960's. You can only guess what's available now.

    1. Re:Not quite microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... U.S. Ambassador. ... to Hawaii' ??

      Are you maybe confusing the 1960s with the 1860s?
      Pre U.S. invasion?

    2. Re:Not quite microwave by Takeel · · Score: 1

      There was a metal membrane hidden inside a wooden carving, which would passively vibrate with sounds in the room. A strong RF beam of around 900 MHz (details are hazy again, and it's not quite microwave) was directed towards the office from a fair distance away, then the signal would be minutely modulated and reflected by the metal membrane.

      Is there a replica of this in the NSA crytography museum?

    3. Re:Not quite microwave by Takeel · · Score: 1

      Is there a replica of this in the NSA crytography museum?

      Just answered my own question:

      http://www.nsa.gov/museum/museu00029.cfm

      The incident in the above-linked article occurred in Moscow, not Hawaii. I don't know whether or not these were seperate instances, or if the grandparent poster was in error.

    4. Re:Not quite microwave by Ge10 · · Score: 1

      No, my bad. But I did read the book nearly 15 years ago.

    5. Re:Not quite microwave by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      900 Mhz, Eh? That's about the same frequency that wireless home phones were "trendy" on about 7 years ago. Luckily, home wireless phones operate at 2.4 Ghz these days.

      I guess the current KGB/MI5/current US "black agency" have moved on to nano-based surveillance, since the FCC now allows 2.4 Ghz...

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  25. Electronic signal cleaning technhiques by kilodelta · · Score: 2, Informative

    I guarantee they're using a MASER. You can thank RADAR pioneers from M.I.T. and Bell Labs for that.

    That being said it is easily defeated. For example - short wavelengths below 1cm start resonating with water vapor. That's why doppler radar has been such a boon to meteorology.

    But there are ways to stop it. Metal impregnated and grounded cement walls that are, oh, 6 to 8 feet below grade level would be reasonably safe. Of course don't put any windows, just ventilation.

    And if you're really that much of a target they'd bug the place before they resorted to using microwave to listen in. BTW, for a good fantasy view of using microwave to peek in I highly recommend watching "The Siege" with Denzel Washinton and Tony Shaloub.

    1. Re:Electronic signal cleaning technhiques by kebes · · Score: 1

      And if you're really that much of a target they'd bug the place before they resorted to using microwave to listen in.

      Consider other applications, like a bunch of bad-guys have just created a hostage situation. You couldn't have known, and bugged the place, before-hand. But you bring in this device and can immediately start listening to what's going on inside. I think the fact that it is portable and easy to setup is what makes it so useful.

      Not to mention that paranoid people will search (and maybe find) bugs... whereas they may have a harder time determining that this device is being used against them.

  26. OT: Einstein quotes... by stupid_is · · Score: 2, Informative
    Google it and there's lots of site who're convinced he did. Granted that some of the origins seem to stem from an unsubstantiated chain mail, but he did seem to come up with all sorts of soundbyte gems.

    Here is one such site.

    --
    -- Intelligence is soluble in alcohol
  27. Maybe I am missing something... by data64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but wouldn't the simple precaution of turning up the radio/TV defeat this ? Humans can pickout certain noise and filter out everything else quite easily. How does tinfoil and other "vibrating surfaces" fare in this regards ?

    1. Re:Maybe I am missing something... by SimilarityEngine · · Score: 1

      I suppose the device would pick up all of the sound in the room, just as microphone hidden behind a picture frame would, and then this would be listened to by the operator. The operator's ears/brain could then filter out the irrelevant stuff quite easily, even with quite a noisy signal.

      Essentially, the waveform heard by the operator hiding outside would be the same signal he'd hear inside the room, with a linear transformation applied (like reverberation, which tends to be easy for the brain to compensate for) and perhaps some small amount of nonlinearity (e.g. clipping, which tends to be harder for the brain to deal with). Therefore to mess things up for the spies, try to find materials which respond in a nonlinear way when sound impinges on them. Either that or use materials which absorb a huge percentage of the incident sound. Basically you'd want your secure room to be like a large recording studio's vocal booth.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    2. Re:Maybe I am missing something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turning on a radio or TV makes it easier for you to be spied upon. This was a very common spying technique during WW2. The radio and TV speakers will act as microphones and transmit the sounds back on the frequency you watching or listening to. A subtraction or differential process like others have posted in comments related to the article is applied. Right off though, I don't know how the technique could be applied to non-broadcast sources like a CD or MP3. I also don't know how it would work with digital TV. I suspect there is still a way to listen if the subject is watching digital TV.

  28. old hat by fliptout · · Score: 2, Informative

    The president at one of my former companies was a colonel in the Army Security Agency. He used to tell me all sorts of things, including how the Russians bombarded the US embassy with radiation to get signature signals back. And this was in the 60s or before. The surveillance technology available to intelligence now must be quite interesting.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    1. Re:old hat by quanminoan · · Score: 1

      "The connection between microwave exposure and cancer has been documented for years. During the Cold War, the Soviets irradiated the U.S. embassy in Moscow, Russia, with low level, twin-beam microwave radiation. Two successive ambassadors developed leukemia. Other staffers also developed cancer, or their blood showed DNA damage, which precedes cancer."

  29. Perverting Technology by rhkaloge · · Score: 2, Informative

    I actually know researchers who have been working with what they call "wall penatrating RADAR" and it sounds a lot like this - it more detects movement and sound then being able to image what is in a room. The big things they claim it would be good for is detecting fires from a distance, finding people trapped in places (it can detect a heartbeat) and, yes, seeing that sniper around the corner. I don't think they considered audio survallence, or at least they never told us about it. But I suppose once you have a patent, you can use the tech for any purpose, noble or sinister.

  30. Mod Parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  31. What about those with pacemakers? by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    Any chance this could affect those with pacemakers?

    1. Re:What about those with pacemakers? by michaelconnor · · Score: 1
      Any chance this could affect those with pacemakers?
      ...and, if so, could it then be dangerous to other embedded electrical devices such as your heart?
  32. SCIFs and TEMPEST by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    They're called SCIFs (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility), more info at: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scif

    Also see TEMPEST - "a U.S. government code word for a set of standards for limiting electric or electromagnetic radiation emanations from electronic equipment such as microchips, monitors, or printers. It is a counter-intelligence measure aimed at the prevention of electronic espionage. The term TEMPEST is often used more broadly for the entire field of compromising emanations or Emissions Security (EMSEC)." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TEMPEST

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  33. Nevemind walls, what about glass by NewKimAll · · Score: 1

    I could have sworn this is ancient technology where they would use microwaves or a laser to do the same thing, but bounce it off glass. It seems to me a piece of glass would be far more superior to use than a wall. Of course, if you have double or triple paned glass, this could be a problem.

  34. Obvious question by rlp · · Score: 1

    Can you mount the detector on top of a handheld railgun??

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Obvious question by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      First, show me a handheld railgun that can throw something larger than a staple further than fifty feet at a usable velocity...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  35. Fire Fire, heh heh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Heh heh, he said 'Dic'tion. Heh heh

  36. Microwave Impulse Radar / Ultra Wideband Radar by jhhl · · Score: 3, Informative
    You are (are you?) probably talking about Microwave Impulse Radar, the miracle technology that was supposed to change our lives years ago. It's tiny bursts of microwave radar, able to be transmitted/received at short ranges at tiny power levels by an on-chip transmitter.
    Here's a typical article about MIR. Last I read, there were legal battles about shoddy treatment of potential vendors by the LLNL. Slashdot readers would probably do well to track this technology!

    A taste of this from http://www.eurekalert.org/features/doe/2004-09/dln l-etu091604.php

    UWB's data capacity, speed, low power requirements, and resistance to interference have attracted the attention of major electronic corporations who recognize the technology's commercial potential. Because UWB can penetrate walls, it could become the center of all communications within homes and small offices. UWB signals could carry voice, data, and video. Products could speed downloading images from a digital camera to a computer, connecting printers to computers, and routing high-definition signals to televisions. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) currently restricts commercial UWB applications to between 3.1 and 10.6 gigahertz because of a concern they could interfere with existing transmissions, especially flight radios, beacons, and the Global Positioning System. FCC rules also limit UWB commercial devices to less than 1 watt, which prevents them from working beyond a relatively short distance (about 10 meters).

    Using an experimental license, Livermore has developed numerous UWB systems in frequency bands ranging from 200 megahertz to 100 gigahertz. Tests at Livermore have shown that the devices do not cause undue interference with other electronic devices operating in this broad frequency range. Livermore efforts are directed at developing UWB devices for the government that operate both above and below the 3.1- to 10.6-gigahertz band designated for commercial devices.
    --
    -- Real Stupidity is the Artificial Intelligence of the 21st century
  37. Re:Foiled .... but what happened to by cell servid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your comment about antennas reminds me of my old dorm room.

    I was in the dorm next to the one that had the uni radio station transmitter on the roof. My room had LOS to the transmitter. When my portable stereo was plugged in but "off" and the tuner was set to that frequency, you could still faintly hear that station. Actually, considering where I kept it near the window, the stereo itself had good LOS. The running gag was that you could pick the station up on a toaster oven.

    I hate to think what it was like to be on the floor directly under the transmitter.

  38. What, no ... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

    "In Soviet Russia..." type comments ?

    1. Re:What, no ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia Microwave snoops You.

      happy now?

  39. Coral cache by waamaral · · Score: 1

    Site is down! Coral cache, anyone?

    Oh, wait...

    --
    What, do I need a sig now?
  40. There is nothing new under the sun by Aging_Newbie · · Score: 1

    In 1952 the Russians planted a small flexible microwave cavity inside the great seal hanging on an embassy wall and used passive microwave excitation to read the vibrations of the cavity and consequently the speech going on in the room. It worked for quite a while until people figured out that stuff discussed in the room was not very secret.

  41. Microwave Cheating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gives new meaning to the term, "wall hack"

  42. Old news by Technician · · Score: 3, Informative

    A wodden copy of the Great Seal of the United States was bugged. Part of the seal was used as a diaphram and was used as a passive resonant reflector. This would pass most bug sweeps as the device was not active, but passive. When painted with a 330 Mhz signal, it would modulate it.

    The only update in the article is now they use microwaves and common materials already in a room.

    Details here;
    http://www.spybusters.com/Great_Seal_Bug.html

    This bug is was delivered in 1946 and discovered in 1952.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  43. Is it just me... by Ginnungagap42 · · Score: 1

    or is it getting warm in here?

  44. No problem, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll just sit around the house naked =)

  45. Re:In your brain by Bloggingbymail · · Score: 0

    Troll? It was a joke!

    --
    Just write a mail http://www.bloggingbymail.com/
  46. Movie by monklegacy · · Score: 1
    The room covered in Foil.

    That reminds me of a movie. The main character was really paranoid of something, I don't remember what, but wasn't there a dog biting involved?

    Weird movie though.

  47. Tin Foil Hat Designs by Mr_Perl · · Score: 2, Informative

    Greetings, You may feel free to borrow my design:

    --

    My poetry site welcomes the unusual.
  48. The 'Cone of Silence' will foil this device by MCRocker · · Score: 1


    Control thought of these things way back in the 1960's. Their highly advanced Cone of Silence(TM) and other innovations would be no match for such technology... er, would you believe that it's the other way around?

    What? I told you not to tell me that!

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  49. "The Thing" by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

    The whole story. It was found in the fifties in American embassy in Moscow. The metal post was stuck in a carved wooden eagle schoolchildren gave to the ambassador. When found, the device was called "The Thing" because the US couldn't figure out what it was for. Peter Wright of MI5 eventually figured it out.

    I guess with the processing power and algorithms of NASA, the US can do this microwave espionage without a metal post. Hrm.

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  50. OLD NEWS:This has been in active use since the 50s by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The first sign the Fed's are listening to you is when they give you a nice small bust of lenin for your mantle peice. That's exactly what the British did to the russian ambassador back in the post world-war two era. They gave him a a gift of a small statue and inside it they had mounted a corner cube which is a passive device that enhances the retro-reflection of microwaves beamed at it. (read about it is Peter Wright's (banned in UK) book Spycatcher--wright was the science officer for MI5 and inventor of the technique)

    The second sign is when you feel toasty warm and the chair feels cold. In the 70's and 80's the carter and reagan administrations were perpetually complaining that the level of microwave energy measured inside the US embassy exceeded the OSHA limits for exposure. Eventually the US built a new embassy with enhanced shielding. UNfortunately the Soviet's put listening devices into the bricks. The embassy had to be knocked down and rebuilt. Of course, peter wright did exactly the same thing to the Soviet embassy in canada. Each night he snuck into the construction site and pulled wires up the inside of the walls to his microphones in specially made window sills. The soviet's learned about it from a mole in MI5 and had to build a second interior wall so that no rooms were near the windows.

    Doppler microwave spying is quite old. As is laser vibrometry on windows.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  51. No Flimsy Surfaces Here by Baby+Duck · · Score: 1

    And here I thought the link would lead to a pic of a room of nudists ...

    --

    "Love heals scars love left." -- Henry Rollins

  52. In the dot-matrix printer days by zardo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It used to be that the old dot matrix printers used to require heavy shielding, because the solenoids inside the printer head would generate a certain radio "sound" for each letter. A van could sit outside an embassy, focus in on the location of a printer, and reproduce a duplicate.

    The United States used this against the soviets for quite a while.

  53. Could it be? by Yanray · · Score: 1

    Applied research from the Iraq war finding application in real life? /sarcasm/

    Na, dubya wouldn't let science/technology get out of government hands unless it was going to line his pockets.

    \sarcasm\

    Sorry I got to get in my jabs when I can.

    --
    --"Sorry for the inconvience." Gods Last Words to his Creation
    DNA, So Long and Thanks for all the Fish
  54. I knew the RIAA was behind this by KnightTristan · · Score: 1

    "All your CDs are covered with tiny cracks and will no longer play."

    They just want to destroy your non-DRM'd CDs!

  55. Admin of the site in the second link by zeet · · Score: 1

    It's interesting to me to compare a Coralized link to a non-Coralized one. The last few times this link hit Slashdot or a similar high-volume site, the server basically went to 100% CPU doing dynamic content but never got particularly slow - I have it set up to throttle at around 3 megabits, and for that traffic mix, it kept it from ever getting sluggish. Currently, the direct site is still fast, and the Coral cache is a little slower, but it's nice to see that this time I'm only shipping out about a megabit, mostly the dynamic pages.

    Fun stuff!

  56. Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US embassy in Moscow was built by local Russian labor (in like the 1970s/1980s) and the CIA et al. found that the large national seal hanging in the Ambassador's office had a microwave resonant cavity/diaphram to facilitate audio eavesdropping.

    I made with similar "hobby projects" using microwaves and lasers in the mid 1980s. These guys "just" figured this stuff out now? Duh!

  57. Oh well.. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Looks like people will have to return to having meetings in the shower.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  58. Gulag Archipelago by technoCon · · Score: 1

    I believe this tech was devised just after WW2 by captured German scientists in something called the Morfino[?] Institute. A friend told me this is all described by Alexandr Solzhenitsyn in his book _The Gulag Archipelago_.

  59. Microwave by BMIComp · · Score: 1

    Microwave radiation directed at people. Sounds safe to me.

  60. Give him head? Be a beacon? by Furan · · Score: 1

    Didn't they do this in uh... Sneakers?

  61. Gees, guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't have to use microwaves. They'll bust your buddy, make a deal, he'll come over wearing a wire and they'll have every word you say while you're selling your baggie on tape.

    ANY listening device can be defeated with a radio, CD player, or TV set, including the narc's wire. The more high tech the listening device, the easier it is to defeat.

    The guy who said he was buying stock in Alcoa was right on: microwaves (or any other radio waves) won't go through a faraday cage.

    But you know what? The feds (and state govs and your country's cops) have nerds, too. So you're going to get busted sooner or later.

  62. Used Here by waldoj · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here in Charlottesville, home of the National Ground Intelligence Center (you might know them for a little kerfuffle involving their providing bad intelligence about nuclear weapons to some president...something about a war?), they've long had a thick wire mesh covering all of their windows. A former employee told me, when I was a kid, that it was designed to reflect microwaves for this very reason.

    -Waldo Jaquith

  63. maybe this is the only option... by doyoudig · · Score: 2, Funny
  64. That reminds me by uberjoe · · Score: 1

    There's an old saying in Washington, The scandal is not that laws are broken; the real scandal is that everything they do is legal.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  65. TMM is back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TMM! How are you!

    I missed you! Please, give me an anime emote, pleeease? I need one right about now. Please? It would make me feel ever so happy and gay.

  66. Doing this with my research project... by qwertykid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm actually making devices to do this as part of an undergraduate research project. The devices I'm making are passive with frequency response up to the 100 GHz range. The best part these is that they don't require any DC bias and as such aren't subject to 1/f noise like schottky diodes. Right now we're looking at applications for security (really advanced metal/explosives detector) and aviation (water vapor is transparent in that frequency range).

  67. No love for Troy Hurtubise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  68. not original by pbjones · · Score: 1

    In the book Spy Catcher, they propose the same method for spying. Too easy to detect!

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  69. Re:OLD NEWS:This has been in active use since the by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This stuff has been happening since the fifties. Nothing new here.

    The russians did that to the US, too. With a nice giant carving of the Great Seal - with a device behind a small hole beneath the beak.

    Consisted of a cavity resonator about the size of a stack of 10 or so dimes, with a tuning post up the middle, a diaphragm for one end (to detune it according to air pressure) and a wire antenna maybe a foot long coupled into the cavity. Excite it with a microwave signal near but not dead-on the resonance and the reflection is amplitude modulated by the sound from the room.

    Better yet: Put a diode in a movable surface. Excite it and it returns harmonics (easy to sort out from other reflections because they're on a different frequency), phase-modulated by doppler shift from the object's motion (like its variant FM, PM is very noise-resistant).

    Russian laborers constructed an embassy where the walls were FULL of thousands of diodes - embedded in the construction material. US had to abandon the building and build one of their own. News items suggested the diodes were to make it hard to sniff for bugs. But IMHO they were the bugs themselves, using the harmonic-generation/doppler/PM trick.

    Like the posting in the root article, this makes every surface a bug. You have to get diodes into them, but the return is cleaner and stronger than echoes from a passive reflector.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  70. Re:OLD NEWS:This has been in active use since the by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Informative

    Consisted of a cavity resonator ...

    Oh, yes. They also did one on that pattern that was disguised as an olive-on-a-toothpick, to put in a martini glass and carry around or leave sitting about at embassy parties.

    And the diode trick also turns anything with a diode in it into a bug.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  71. Man. . . by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
    . . . is it ever hot in here!
    Walks over to thermostat
    Hmm. . . well it's set at 76 . . . I wonder why. . . GOOD LORD! 386 degrees?!

    Two spies are outside in van.
    One spy to the other:
    Dammit! I thought I told you to put it on "defrost"!

  72. Re:OLD NEWS:This has been in active use since the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The first sign the Fed's are listening to you is when they give you a nice small bust of lenin for your mantle peice."

    Wow! Actually, someone once gave one of my friends a small bust of lenin. Shit! (and I'm totally serious, but that's not to suggest that the feds would have any reason to spy on any of my friends)...

  73. Instead of foil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    glue popcorn kernels on the walls. Not only are you warned of the surveillance by the appearance of a tasty treat, but each "pop" causes vibration to obfuscate what was being said. This is known as the Val Kilmer method in spy circles.

  74. Good review of 20 year old technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK. This type of technology has been around (at least) 20 years. Someone is babbling in a secure, locked room. The blinds are closed. Armed guards are all around. From 2 miles away, a stealthy secret agent fires a laser at the center of the window. The very faint reflected beam is recieved, amplified and filtered to the same amplitude as the incident laser 'frequency' (the laser light need not be in the visible part of the spectrum, and for the purposes here, it's best that it isn't). The reflected signal is mixed with the incident one (like in a tank circuit, found in every superheterodyne radio made in the last 50 years --which is about 99% of all radios made in the last 50 years, (the good ones anyway)--. The sum and difference are passed through a diode and amplified, the difference between the two being the voice causing the window to vibrate --causing the signal to modulate--. A loud horn can be blaring outside, but it won't affect the reflected light. That they are using Microwaves rather than laser light is just a difference in frequency (it's all electromagnetic radiation). It was old in '87 (at least the voice part of it). That they don't need windows anymore, and can 'see' inside --no surprise.

  75. Fridge, books, chair, but NO HAT.... Disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheesh! They cover the chair, the computer, the books, the fridge, the ceiling and walls all with good 'ol tin foil, but NOT THE HAT??!? Why? There are satellites up there people, aliens just looking for some poor unsuspecting cranial thought to turn into an interplanetary movie-of-the-week! And it's all just for the taking. People don't even know when they've been hacked! Take it from me people, take your favorite hat, get some tin-foil, and tell people it's for Halloween! No alien is going to turn my thoughts into a movie of the week, not anymore, anyway! Don't believe me? Just let yourself get abducted, and you'll see! A hundred billion aliens all sitting in the intergalactic theater, chuckling through their third nose about some private thought you had while sleeping. It's just not fair!

  76. Do wet towels on your head vibrate? by Gnuontz · · Score: 1

    I think that it is funny how crime and the methods of detecting it change so little over the years.

  77. Microwave surveillance. by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

    It is possible to more than listen to a conversation in a room using this type of technology. Theoretically it is possible to spy on what a person is thinking to oneself by scanning the way muscles move and then analyzing patterns. Those muscle movements are not noticeable to oneself but to a computer with some software it is possible to decode what one thinks.

  78. So thats why... by xTantrum · · Score: 1

    everybody in the future is depicted as wearing those aluminum suits, cause their is so much microwaves traveling through the air!!! god now i get it!!! i always wondered about that.

    --
    $action = empty(PHP) ? backToC() : unset(PHP) ; "when the concrete cases are understood, the abstractions are readily
  79. Terahertz band electromagnetic waves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What this aticle about is the so called terahertz band technology. It was discussed big in the press some two to three years ago. Yes, it is supposed to let you see through walls, much like ultrasound and also allow eavesdropping.

  80. This was invented by Theremin! by pestie · · Score: 1

    The man who designed that device? A brilliant Russian engineer named Leon Theremin. Yes, the same one who invented the musical instrument that bears his name.