Everything about KDE is already so kramped and unkonventional as it is. I don't see why they would want to overkrowd their menus, windows, applications , etc. even more... Despite it's more polished look than Gnome (which is of course up for argument), it's ruining the user experience by not keeping things simple.
These tech companies' strategies for international business are pretty much all corrupt.. Nearly any company you can think of sells their products at higher prices abroad.. Why? Because in most developing countries, the gap between the wealthy and the poor are much greater than those in developed nations. So much that the wealthy who can afford a product at $200 can also easily pay $400 for it as well, whereas the people that can't afford the product won't be able to afford it unless you price it symbolically at $1...
So Microsoft doesn't lose either way, they maintain their monopoly and still make nearly normal amount of profit.
These errors would have significance if they were in an article instead of being in a comment to a post, which mentions an article.
I don't think there was any sort of personal attack intended here, just mention of the fact that the article has no flow to it... Clown hat, curly hair, smiley face.
Slashdot Mirror
My parents didn't even know each other back then...
Everything about KDE is already so kramped and unkonventional as it is. I don't see why they would want to overkrowd their menus, windows, applications , etc. even more... Despite it's more polished look than Gnome (which is of course up for argument), it's ruining the user experience by not keeping things simple.
These tech companies' strategies for international business are pretty much all corrupt.. Nearly any company you can think of sells their products at higher prices abroad.. Why? Because in most developing countries, the gap between the wealthy and the poor are much greater than those in developed nations. So much that the wealthy who can afford a product at $200 can also easily pay $400 for it as well, whereas the people that can't afford the product won't be able to afford it unless you price it symbolically at $1...
So Microsoft doesn't lose either way, they maintain their monopoly and still make nearly normal amount of profit.
These errors would have significance if they were in an article instead of being in a comment to a post, which mentions an article.
I don't think there was any sort of personal attack intended here, just mention of the fact that the article has no flow to it... Clown hat, curly hair, smiley face.
A majority of the ruling class always manages to fool an ignorant majority of the public and this is what we end up with.
Can't mankind come up with something new?
Or at least a better implementation?