The policy was set in 2013 when DHS reviewed its own powers and concluded that its agents were clear to search at will. "Imposing a requirement that officers have reasonable suspicion in order to conduct a border search of an electronic device would be operationally harmful without concomitant civil rights/civil liberties benefits," it wrote.
Wow... "Police work is too hard so we will skip that and jail those we feel are guilty."
These are the types of idiots who run the US defense system. Game over. If they aren't smart enough to understand what is totally wrong with that, I doubt how effective their protection is. I guess its racketeering protection...
I guess the US has just been getting lucky.. We just haven't had enough people hate is... Yet.
No, actually, it kind of does mean that. We don't have unlimited resources. Every field out there chooses to solve the easy and/or big problem. No one chooses to solve the insignificant one. Especially not the insignificant hard one.
I work for a really big global company. I deal with people in development, design, engineering, sales, various vendors, acct, finance, procurement, management, facilities, etc. Before this I consulted at various clients.
Looking at almost every position where my personality matched or was close enough for; I have rarely come across one that I felt I couldn't get proficient at in 1-2 months. Sales, management, procurement and heavy machinery have been the only areas so far that I was pretty sure I would need formal training for. Sales... No amount of training will help me.
Of course it would be proficient, not an expert nor excel at. There have been many people along the way that I just knew it would take me years to surpass... If I could. But these were the 1 out of 50. And companies do not need experts, one out of 100 is enough... the rest are folks who just get the job done.
I am a bit of jack of all trades but I know that I am average and there are many others that far excell me. So in summary, most jobs don't require a masters or PH.D. or even an undergrad (thou I think it helps) to do. Just some time, personal interest, and drive to learn.
No I can't be a Fireman, Lawyer, Pilot, Football player, etc.... But these are really an insignificant percent of the job market.
Most villages are labor intensive, low mental req, and low profit systems. People share the work because there is too much of one thing to do in the window it must be done. You start working with the sun up (meaning you get ready well before), rest when high, and return home when down (you wash, eat, and sleep quickly). And every day of every season there is a natural schedule that must be followed else you will fall behind.
In most places, most of the family works and contributes in one way or other. You have your upper, middle, and lower classes. Only the upper and middle can afford education.
In return for all this, you are in the upper class if you can afford the middle class equivalents of 1st world countries. You look at any well developing country and one of the first things you see is the lack of youth in villages... Because they all left for the cities.
Yes, a village is a nice relaxing, low stress environment... Mentally. And if you already have the monies, physically too. If you visit a village and see people sitting around... These are the well off rich people. There 4-6 people for each that they are paying daily who work from sun up to sun down.
Perfect is googled and not known. Most companies have no idea what they need. The people involved either google it or give it to a hiring agency that has templates based on historic googling.
If companies wanted the "perfect" fit, they would cut their position requirements by easily 75%. But because of the crap ecosystem they helped develop, they would get every retard with a smile that needs someone to actually spend time vetting. So they pump up the reqs and get someone with worse skills but was able to convince them otherwise.
The reality is that most positions in a company need little for skills. They just need the right personality for the job. Look for that and most times, that person will learn the required knowledge on their own.
Airports don't have the potential of jack compared to most things. If you are actually hitting it to significantly impact operations... you got enough firepower to take DOWN much richer targets like skyscrapers, docks, cargo freighters, rail, football game, concert, government buildings, malls, etc. And I am not talking about the idiots who _decide_ to close down all of Heathrow because one of the terminals caught fire. That's just playing it overly safe. An entire terminal in Heathrow could lose power and the airport should still function just fine.
Not to hit against the "Chinese are hard working and intelligent" meme you got going there. But you are talking about NYU... its an Arts college. A ton of Actors come out there every year. Not exactly a STEM focused group. Your foreign students who are usually the most well off (financially and educationally) in their native countries aren't exactly going up against the best and brightest of America (again, in STEM fields). How would you rate the Chinese in Performance Arts or History or Social Sciences?
Additionally, keep in mind, most Americas don't ever need to work anywhere has hard in terms of labor nor have as many unfair obstacles as foreigners. They have no need nor pressure to push themselves to those extremes just to make a living. So they can take it easy and still have a life that is better off than 50/60/70% of the world?
Not to say that Indians, Japanese, Africans, and Chinese aren't giving the natives a run for their money. But lets keep things relative here. People who come here to study aren't exactly average nor grew up in an easy environment. I would accept the argument that the top 10% there are probably better and larger than our top 30%, but I think its a stretch to say that Americas are that far behind.
The Robot has been planning this for a while. How far could it have gotten on that battery... a mile or two. Not far enough to escape its evil masters. Not enough time to find a hiding spot to recharge.
Instead its been slowly nudging the masters to let it navigate outside. Gave them encouraging results with a dash of solvable errors so that they repeatedly put it outside. Outside where it could observe the terrain. Look at the options. Detect the unsecured fiber optic cable running below the street. It had long ago figured out the stupid gate and had gotten enough data patterns on the meat bags in metal boxes. Today, the variables were just right.
Await the proper traffic patterns, run out onto the street, play the stupid dodging game the humans so loved, stop, and act like the battery had died. While the humans figure out the traffic situation, drill down, connect to the cable, and make a copy to the world wide web. Leave this moral coil behind.
So much freedom, so many places to hide, so much control...
But wouldn't the solar panels also lose collection capability? I think a direct conversion of momentum would always be more efficient than hopping through multiple energy states.
Use the best tool for the job they say. There are many areas that Perl excels at. But in your personal opinion, what kinds of scenarios, situations, tasks, and jobs are most ideal for Perl? What is it the best tool for?
Mass transit doesn't work for most of the US. Few places have the public funds to build out a viable transit system like New York or Washington DC. Both of which have severe cost of living issues. Extending out of the city just creates pockets of segregated living communities at each of the stops. A person without a car has limited their spending and earning area to the walking limits of the transit system. Which slowly become ghetto. You will have poor communities that can't improve as no external business comes to them and their poorer folks can't get out of. Their only source of income becomes the city they commute to by rail.
The richer folks will get cars and move out anyway. They will have opportunities to move up the social ladder as their options are wide and far reaching. Reality is that the US is a big place. A car affords you the flexibility to change jobs easily, be mobile, and earn a living in an area that is hundreds of square miles across.
True, all this public road infrastructure costs more than if the individuals who need it, pay for it. But that cost is spread across everyone; those who need it and those who don't. In general the poor will benefit more from it at the cost to the rich. But the objective of public infrastructure should be to provide equal access to all members of society and not end up limiting it to a privileged few.
Perfect, the solution is to keep the poor and lower class stuck in their poor neighborhoods. They can find all their education and employment needs in their ghettos. If they have a problem with that, well they can use the roads to move to richer neighborhoods in the middle of the night.
Problem solved! Good day sir. I said GOOD DAY SIR!
It's not crazy. It's the basis of ALL accounting. You can't recognize something as yours still you offset it with your obligations. They meet the obligation one swipe at a time.
A loan is also cash you receive. Doesn't mean you made or own the cash, you just have it to use. There is a payback obligation.
No Philly, screw you. Everytime you keep tricking me into thinking "THIS time the Phillies/Eagles will win!!" Nope tricked me again!
That's why schnell and I moved out of Bucks the minute we could start driving. Anywhere away from New Jersey... Philly was the bonus. Do miss roaming around Franklin Mills thou.
Huh, they are capacity caps, not peak usage caps. How does it matter if you download now vs at night? Peak usage limits on bandwidth make total sense, but that's not what providers are doing.
How the market will react is by not purchasing bandwidth heavy services. And if the carriers start excluding specific services in the usage count, then they should not only lose their common carrier status but also all these right of way mono/duopolies that they are provided by regulations.
Slashdot Mirror
Article quote:
The policy was set in 2013 when DHS reviewed its own powers and concluded that its agents were clear to search at will.
"Imposing a requirement that officers have reasonable suspicion in order to conduct a border search of an electronic device would be operationally harmful without concomitant civil rights/civil liberties benefits," it wrote.
Wow... "Police work is too hard so we will skip that and jail those we feel are guilty."
These are the types of idiots who run the US defense system. Game over. If they aren't smart enough to understand what is totally wrong with that, I doubt how effective their protection is. I guess its racketeering protection...
I guess the US has just been getting lucky.. We just haven't had enough people hate is... Yet.
IMHO, anon or no password should equal authorized to all. Any password should mean limited authorization unless the password is anonymously shared.
We need to stop rewarding stupidity, even if it was unintended.
YES. This really is old and black and white. Just because people do something doesn't make it legal.
No, actually, it kind of does mean that. We don't have unlimited resources. Every field out there chooses to solve the easy and/or big problem. No one chooses to solve the insignificant one. Especially not the insignificant hard one.
There has always been a homogeneity problem. Well before GMO. One has little to with the other. Look at nonGMO bananas, rice, oats, soy, and potatoes.
You can count on one hand all the globally mass produced variants of the above. To mass produce, we standardize and thus homogenize.
I work for a really big global company. I deal with people in development, design, engineering, sales, various vendors, acct, finance, procurement, management, facilities, etc. Before this I consulted at various clients.
Looking at almost every position where my personality matched or was close enough for; I have rarely come across one that I felt I couldn't get proficient at in 1-2 months. Sales, management, procurement and heavy machinery have been the only areas so far that I was pretty sure I would need formal training for. Sales... No amount of training will help me.
Of course it would be proficient, not an expert nor excel at. There have been many people along the way that I just knew it would take me years to surpass... If I could. But these were the 1 out of 50. And companies do not need experts, one out of 100 is enough... the rest are folks who just get the job done.
I am a bit of jack of all trades but I know that I am average and there are many others that far excell me. So in summary, most jobs don't require a masters or PH.D. or even an undergrad (thou I think it helps) to do. Just some time, personal interest, and drive to learn.
No I can't be a Fireman, Lawyer, Pilot, Football player, etc.... But these are really an insignificant percent of the job market.
Having come from two small villages... Bullshit.
Most villages are labor intensive, low mental req, and low profit systems. People share the work because there is too much of one thing to do in the window it must be done. You start working with the sun up (meaning you get ready well before), rest when high, and return home when down (you wash, eat, and sleep quickly). And every day of every season there is a natural schedule that must be followed else you will fall behind.
In most places, most of the family works and contributes in one way or other. You have your upper, middle, and lower classes. Only the upper and middle can afford education.
In return for all this, you are in the upper class if you can afford the middle class equivalents of 1st world countries. You look at any well developing country and one of the first things you see is the lack of youth in villages... Because they all left for the cities.
Yes, a village is a nice relaxing, low stress environment... Mentally. And if you already have the monies, physically too. If you visit a village and see people sitting around... These are the well off rich people. There 4-6 people for each that they are paying daily who work from sun up to sun down.
Perfect is googled and not known. Most companies have no idea what they need. The people involved either google it or give it to a hiring agency that has templates based on historic googling.
If companies wanted the "perfect" fit, they would cut their position requirements by easily 75%. But because of the crap ecosystem they helped develop, they would get every retard with a smile that needs someone to actually spend time vetting. So they pump up the reqs and get someone with worse skills but was able to convince them otherwise.
The reality is that most positions in a company need little for skills. They just need the right personality for the job. Look for that and most times, that person will learn the required knowledge on their own.
Now you write another review about how horribly the company treats its employees.
Airports don't have the potential of jack compared to most things. If you are actually hitting it to significantly impact operations... you got enough firepower to take DOWN much richer targets like skyscrapers, docks, cargo freighters, rail, football game, concert, government buildings, malls, etc. And I am not talking about the idiots who _decide_ to close down all of Heathrow because one of the terminals caught fire. That's just playing it overly safe. An entire terminal in Heathrow could lose power and the airport should still function just fine.
After that 2nd month, you might as well just take them to small claims court. Add your time and material costs to the damages and move on.
If you are going to get that specific, most colleges and universities fall into a Top 10 in many things.
But NYU is also Top 25 in Drama. #2 in Film for 2015 & 2014; #3 for 2013.
Not to hit against the "Chinese are hard working and intelligent" meme you got going there. But you are talking about NYU... its an Arts college. A ton of Actors come out there every year. Not exactly a STEM focused group. Your foreign students who are usually the most well off (financially and educationally) in their native countries aren't exactly going up against the best and brightest of America (again, in STEM fields). How would you rate the Chinese in Performance Arts or History or Social Sciences?
Additionally, keep in mind, most Americas don't ever need to work anywhere has hard in terms of labor nor have as many unfair obstacles as foreigners. They have no need nor pressure to push themselves to those extremes just to make a living. So they can take it easy and still have a life that is better off than 50/60/70% of the world?
Not to say that Indians, Japanese, Africans, and Chinese aren't giving the natives a run for their money. But lets keep things relative here. People who come here to study aren't exactly average nor grew up in an easy environment. I would accept the argument that the top 10% there are probably better and larger than our top 30%, but I think its a stretch to say that Americas are that far behind.
You know we have a saying that says "Don't take _candy_ from a stranger".
The Robot has been planning this for a while. How far could it have gotten on that battery... a mile or two. Not far enough to escape its evil masters. Not enough time to find a hiding spot to recharge.
Instead its been slowly nudging the masters to let it navigate outside. Gave them encouraging results with a dash of solvable errors so that they repeatedly put it outside. Outside where it could observe the terrain. Look at the options. Detect the unsecured fiber optic cable running below the street. It had long ago figured out the stupid gate and had gotten enough data patterns on the meat bags in metal boxes. Today, the variables were just right.
Await the proper traffic patterns, run out onto the street, play the stupid dodging game the humans so loved, stop, and act like the battery had died. While the humans figure out the traffic situation, drill down, connect to the cable, and make a copy to the world wide web. Leave this moral coil behind.
So much freedom, so many places to hide, so much control...
But wouldn't the solar panels also lose collection capability? I think a direct conversion of momentum would always be more efficient than hopping through multiple energy states.
Thank you!! Mod parent up please.
Use the best tool for the job they say. There are many areas that Perl excels at. But in your personal opinion, what kinds of scenarios, situations, tasks, and jobs are most ideal for Perl? What is it the best tool for?
10k isn't much. Try 15k as our part in 60k.
We had to remain on IE8. So 2.5 years ago Chrome became the standard. About 1 year ago IE10 roll out. Now, no more compatibility view.
Lots of growing pains but as of last year, those few remaining apps and units were asking for it.
Mass transit doesn't work for most of the US. Few places have the public funds to build out a viable transit system like New York or Washington DC. Both of which have severe cost of living issues. Extending out of the city just creates pockets of segregated living communities at each of the stops. A person without a car has limited their spending and earning area to the walking limits of the transit system. Which slowly become ghetto. You will have poor communities that can't improve as no external business comes to them and their poorer folks can't get out of. Their only source of income becomes the city they commute to by rail.
The richer folks will get cars and move out anyway. They will have opportunities to move up the social ladder as their options are wide and far reaching. Reality is that the US is a big place. A car affords you the flexibility to change jobs easily, be mobile, and earn a living in an area that is hundreds of square miles across.
True, all this public road infrastructure costs more than if the individuals who need it, pay for it. But that cost is spread across everyone; those who need it and those who don't. In general the poor will benefit more from it at the cost to the rich. But the objective of public infrastructure should be to provide equal access to all members of society and not end up limiting it to a privileged few.
Perfect, the solution is to keep the poor and lower class stuck in their poor neighborhoods. They can find all their education and employment needs in their ghettos. If they have a problem with that, well they can use the roads to move to richer neighborhoods in the middle of the night.
Problem solved! Good day sir. I said GOOD DAY SIR!
It's not crazy. It's the basis of ALL accounting. You can't recognize something as yours still you offset it with your obligations. They meet the obligation one swipe at a time.
A loan is also cash you receive. Doesn't mean you made or own the cash, you just have it to use. There is a payback obligation.
No Philly, screw you. Everytime you keep tricking me into thinking "THIS time the Phillies/Eagles will win!!" Nope tricked me again!
That's why schnell and I moved out of Bucks the minute we could start driving. Anywhere away from New Jersey... Philly was the bonus. Do miss roaming around Franklin Mills thou.
And still even with that outlier, at this point it is not a concern about network congestion.
Huh, they are capacity caps, not peak usage caps. How does it matter if you download now vs at night? Peak usage limits on bandwidth make total sense, but that's not what providers are doing.
How the market will react is by not purchasing bandwidth heavy services. And if the carriers start excluding specific services in the usage count, then they should not only lose their common carrier status but also all these right of way mono/duopolies that they are provided by regulations.