Slashdot Mirror


User: David+Ham

David+Ham's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
163
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 163

  1. ? on Major Problems with Rambus · · Score: 1

    Does this affect motherboard manufactured by intel only, or motherboards using the intel chipset? I'd be interested in knowing - I'm about to sink some serious money into an upgrade to my system, gonna go with the Abit BP6, but if there's a problem with that as well, I just might wait....

  2. ... on Linus Looks at His Crystal Ball · · Score: 1

    Most of it has been heard before, but the interview does a nice job of pulling a lot of it together. Still worth the read.

  3. Another good read on Everything We've Heard About Columbine is Wrong? · · Score: 2

    I found this article a while back. Unfortunately, I lost the author/publication information. An excellent read on the Columbine tragedy and the aftermath. If anyone has the information on the writer/publication, please let me know. I typed this in myself, so there may be a few typos. Sorry.

    "When I think back on all the crap I learned in high school...," Paul
    Simon mused in a popular song some years ago. Simon, of course, was in
    high school long before multiculturalism, Afrocentrism, Outcome-Based
    Education, bilingual education, Heather Has 17 Mommies, Holocaust
    Studies, and assorted therapeutic group gropes and mass séances in
    "counseling" displaced the deathless vapidities about history, life, and
    literature that typically spill from the lips of teachers in all ages
    and nations. But no matter what sort of crap Simon endured in his high
    school and what sort poisons the minds and spirits of teenagers today,
    it is nothing compared to the offal that the American news media
    regularly inject into grown-ups and anyone else who pays attention to
    them.
    The mass murder of 12 students at Littleton, Colorado's Columbine High
    School on April 20 was the occasion for the construction of a veritable
    mountain of journalistic chicken doodle by almost every major newspaper
    and news service in the world. The blood had not stopped flowing before
    the ace reporters and investigative journalists had the whole gory mess
    all figured out and ready to serve hot and piping to a gape-jawed
    public. As it turned out, almost everything they reported was wrong -
    some of it almost certainly deliberately wrong - and not only wrong, but
    a carefully crafted wrongness that pointed in the exact opposite
    direction of the truth about Littleton and a lot of other things in the
    United States that it is important for some people to hide.
    The two teenage killers, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, an Associated
    Press story told us on April 21, were "said to be part of an outcast
    group with right-wing overtones called the Trenchcoat Mafia." "Students
    said the group was fascinated with World War II and the Nazis and noted
    that Tuesday [April 20] was Adolf Hitler's birthday," it continued. The
    same day, yet another AP story described "Trenchcoat Mafia" as a group
    that "hated blacks, Hispanics, Jews and athletes." A student named Aaron
    Cohn, repeatedly quoted in several stories, claimed the "Mafia" "often
    made anti-Semitic comments"; he was the apparent source of the story
    that the killers had called the black student they murdered by a racial
    epithet, while other students said the group or the killers themselves
    worse "Nazi crosses" and "made generally derogatory remarks' about
    Hispanics and blacks." "They talked about Hitler and worse clothes with
    German insignia," gasped the New York Times on April 23. "They hated
    jocks, admired Nazis and scorned normalcy... They were white
    supremacists...," the Washington Post bubbled on the same day.
    And so it went for the next week or so, with proponents of more gun
    control, more voodoo education, more hate crime laws, and more federal
    manipulation of schools, law enforcement, and families flapping their
    wings and their jaws overtime, intent on squeezing every possible ounce
    of political advantage from what the press at once dubbed "the worst
    attack on a school in American history." Even that wasn't true. In 1927,
    a school board member named Andrew Kehos planted several dynamite bombs
    under his local schoolhouse in Michigan and blew it to splinters,
    killing himself and 45 other people. Including 38 students. Whether Mr.
    Kehos was also reported to have "right-wing overtones" and to be a
    "white supremacist" is not known, but that atrocity committed by a
    lunatic, like most others in civilized countries, was soon forgotten.
    The Littleton massacre wasn't forgotten, at least not for several weeks
    after it happened, and it soon became clear that the media were trying
    to use it in almost exactly the same way they had exploited the Oklahoma
    City bombing of April 19, 1995. They were setting a Reichstag fire,
    creating a vast and elaborate lie that sought to pin the blame for the
    Littleton massacre on "the right."
    But the Littleton Lie couldn't last because it was just so contrary to
    certain facts that soon began to emerge from the carnage, and in any
    case, the Lie was largely irrelevant to the main political usage of the
    massacre, more gun control. Yet the major media kept the Littleton
    incident on their front pages for at least two weeks after it occurred;
    it was only when the facts did emerge that they lost interest in it and
    the story began to follow Mr. Kehos and his dynamite bombs into that
    subcontinent of oblivion reserved for inconvenient facts and truths. The
    facts, you see, not only gave the lie to the Littleton Lie but pointed
    to a truth the news media didn't want to bring up.
    One glimpse of reality began to creep onto the national screen when the
    contents of Eric Harris's website were released. Those contents had been
    reported to the local police by an alarmed parent more than a year
    before young Master Harris tripped over the edge on April 20, but the
    cops had ignored them. As soon as the massacre occurred, however,
    American Online shut down the Harris website, and no one got a gander at
    what was on it until the New York Times, to its credit, reported at
    least some of the contents on May 1.
    The Times found the following passage, written by Harris, "intriguing":
    "You know what I hate?" Harris "repeatedly asked readers of the site,"
    the Times reported. "One of the answers he gave was, 'RACISM!'" "He
    wrote that people who are biased against 'blacks, Asians, Mexicans or
    people from any other country or race besides white-American' should
    'have their arms ripped off' and be burned." "'Don't let me catch you
    making fun of someone just because they are of a different color,' he
    wrote." Young Master Harris, as it turns out, hated many things besides
    "RACISM," among them fans of "Star Wars," people who mispronounce words,
    liars, country music, freedom of expression, opponents of the death
    penalty, and smokers. But "RACISM," so far from being a creed to which
    he subscribed, was definitely on the enemies' list.
    As for Dylan Klebold, it soon came out that he was of Jewish background
    and that his grandfather had been a prominent Jewish philanthropist in
    Ohio. In fact, young Master Klebold was reported to have taken part in a
    Passover seder only shortly before the massacre. Whatever motivated him
    to splatter the brains of his pals, it probably wasn't the admiration
    for Hitler and the Nazis that the press had attributed to him and his
    colleague, nor did Eric Harris's website reveal any sympathy for Hitler
    or for "racism" or indeed for any "right-wing overtones" except perhaps
    his enthusiasm for capital punishment.
    But what finally and definitely exposed the fantasies, speculations,
    unexamined assumptions, and outright lies the news media concocted and
    inflicted on us for two weeks was an interview in the New York Times on
    April 30 with several students at the high school who had actually known
    the killers. What they had to say should have ended the professional
    careers of several of the con artists who pass themselves off as
    "reporters" and whose misreporting had already fabricated myths and
    legends about the Littleton killings that will probably never die
    completely.
    The infamous "Trenchcoat Mafia" that was supposedly behind the
    bloodshed, said 16-year-old Devon Adams, consisted last year of about 15
    or 20 people who wore black trenchcoats as a kind of clique uniform.
    They played cards and hung out and smoked together. "That's all it was,"
    and anyway, more than half of them had graduated last year; the group
    barely existed anymore. Harris and Klebold weren't even a part of it, he
    told the Times.
    Well, but what about the racism, the sympathy for Hitler, the obsession
    with World War II? Meg Hains, 17, said,
    I am black/white mixed. And when the media is coming up with this
    thing that Dylan and Eric were racists, they weren't. They were my
    friends. They were very nice to me, both of them. I don't get this whole
    racial thing that people are coming up with.
    Miss Hains, you can see, has a lot to learn, and no doubt a good deal
    of the remainder of her learning experience will be devoted to "getting"
    the "whole racial thing" with which her elders are so obsessed. Devon
    Adams acknowledged that Harris and Klebold did use "racial slurs," but
    "I don't think it meant that they were racist." "What about the Nazi
    stuff?" the Times insisted. Meg Hains replied, "That is the biggest load
    of [expletive] I've ever heard. They never wore swastikas on their arms.
    Never. Not in this entire year that I've known them. No." Devon Adams
    said, "They're not Nazis. They didn't worship Nazis." They read books
    about Nazis because they were studying World War II history in school,
    he said. The report that they shouted "Heil Hitler" when bowling was
    also untrue, said Dustin Thurman, 18.
    In short, when the press told the public that Harris and Klebold were
    "white supremacists," "right wingers," "racists," "neo-Nazis," etc.,
    they lied. Journalists assumed, probably because unconsciously they have
    come to believe their own propaganda line, that all mass violence is the
    work of the "right," a catch-all term that can include anyone from
    Elizabeth Dole to the Aryan Nations. If it's the assassination of a
    president, the bombing of a federal building, or the mass murder of
    high-school students by wigged-out teenagers full of pubescent
    resentment, plugged-up hormones, and the mental and moral garbage
    regularly served them by their schools, their televisions,, their
    movies, their music, their books, their government, and their
    newspapers, then it has to be because "the right" is on the march. And
    of course, this myth is useful for discrediting anyone who really is on
    "the right" when he questions the quack nostrums and increased state
    power that the left demands as a "solution" to the "crisis."
    What, then, did cause the massacre at Littleton. The simple answer is
    "human nature," the propensity that all human beings have to explode, as
    Mr. Kehos exploded back in 1927 and as lots of other people do in one
    way or another every now and then. Of course, not everybody does
    explode. Why did Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold do so?
    The question is probably still unanswerable, but one story that popped
    up in the Washington Post is suggestive. A woman who was a friend of the
    Klebold family recalls that Dylan used to play with her daughters and
    remembers telling his mother that in her house she had only girl toys
    while in your house, you have only "boy toys." "Boy toys," replied Mrs.
    Klebold, "but no toy guns."
    Dylan Klebold's father is said to be "a liberal who favors gun
    control," yet another Associated Press story reported several days after
    the killings. His mother worked in a community program that helped
    "disabled students gain access to education." When Dylan and Eric broke
    into a car and got caught, they were placed in an "anger management"
    program, and the police who ran the program praised them for their
    conduct. As for Mark Manes, the pal of Eric and Dylan who sold them the
    semi-automatic pistol they used in the shootings, his mother is a member
    of Handgun Control, Inc., the country's largest gun-control lobbying
    organization. "She has been against guns forever," Manes' lawyer told
    the New York Times. "Mark grew up in a house where no weapons were
    present." Much the same seems to have been true of Eric Harris,, who was
    an enthusiastic fan of Bill Clinton's bombing of Serbia. "I hope we do
    go to war," he told a classmate. "I'll be the first one there." That
    exactly why Harris tried to enlist in the Marines a few days before the
    blow-up at the school. Maybe it wasn't Marilyn Manson that lit his fuse
    so much as the Weekly Standard or the Wall Street Journal editorial
    page.
    The dirty little truth the American propaganda machine won't tell us
    directly, the secret that has to be pried out from between the lines of
    the machine's unreliable newspapers and thinly disguised politicization,
    is that all three of these young men grew up in the make-believe world
    concocted by liberalism, a fantastic place where race and sex mean
    nothing; where violence and crime don't exist and guns have no function
    and no meaning, even as toys; where wars against "ethnic nationalists"
    for "humanitarian goals" are morally imperative but owning a handgun to
    protect your home and family ought to be a crime; where war is only one
    more goody-good community project like getting disabled students access
    to education; where people who adhere to "RACISM!" deserve to have their
    arms ripped off and be burned and human beings, including healthy young
    men whose genes and glands and brains drive them to aggression and
    conflict, are simply blank slates to be shaped and twisted and scribbled
    over by "anger management" programs and all the therapeutic witchcraft
    that Hillary Clinton and her friends really believe in. It was not Adolf
    Hitler or Marilyn Manson or the "right" that made Eric Harris and Dylan
    Klebold pop their corks in April but liberalism itself and all the
    illusions liberalism conjures up to mask the truths about human beings
    and human society that it refuses to face. That's a secret the news
    media can't expose, partly because those who run them can't even
    recognize it and partly because, if they every did, the whole system
    constructed on the lies of liberalism would crumble.

  4. Re:10AM on Building Virtual Universities · · Score: 1

    He said that we must be in another time zone. I'm saying "no, i'm in EST, not in england or something." eastern standard time, aka gmt -5:00

  5. Re:... on Building Virtual Universities · · Score: 1
    I HAVE to agree with your number one reason. There just aren't enough of them...

    And #3...reminiscent of Ferris Bueller's Day Off...we NEED more Ben Stein's teaching us..."Bueller...Bueller...Bueller"...

  6. Re:10AM on Building Virtual Universities · · Score: 1

    and by the way, i'm in the eastern time zone :)

  7. Re:10AM on Building Virtual Universities · · Score: 1

    been up since about 5 pm yesterday :)

  8. Virtual U on Building Virtual Universities · · Score: 3

    I think the problem with the idea of a Virtual University is the capacity to be ripped off. Figure that it wouldn't be all that challenging for someone to create their own virtual "university" and have people sending them thousands of dollars for degrees that mean nothing. There's already been something like this with the mail-order degree deal where you "earn your degree from home." I wonder what security measures would be enacted to prevent fraud.

  9. SciAm on I Am Not Doctor Strangelove · · Score: 1

    Scientific American seems to be one of the best written magazines to date. Always have quality stuff. Good interview too.

  10. This is sad... on AntiOnline Accuses, Attrition.org Responds · · Score: 2

    It's sad to see someone in a position of such power to abuse it the way JV does. I read both sides of the story from an unbiased view, and in my eyes, Attrition.org wins this one hands down. JV's argument is baseless - his "evidence" is weak at best. But the really sad thing is that this isn't just children fighting - there's a very real possibility that people are going to be hurt in this war of words.

  11. Re:With developments as they are going.. on Withered brain cells restored (in monkeys, anyway) · · Score: 1

    But see, what if you could do it without really "aging" all that much physically? What if you were able to pass from one body of yours, when you're maybe 50 or 60, to a clone body created 20 years earlier? So you become wiser and wiser but maintain peak physical condition (or at least start over in it every 40 years or so). You're able to watch civilization grow, to watch technology surpass even our wildest dreams... I don't want to live forever, because as someone mentioend earlier, death is a pretty healthy part of the life cycle. But if you can extend my life by maybe another 100 years so I can watch as technology progresses and as we evolve as a society... sign me right up.

  12. In addition to that... on Withered brain cells restored (in monkeys, anyway) · · Score: 1

    I'm sure that we'll be using nanotechnology to help as well. Imagine creating tiny computers that float around in the bloodstream and maybe help clear arteries or repair wounds? It's amazing to think that probably someone reading Slashdot will be involved with this too. Maybe creating the hardware or programming computers to reconnect all of the tiny fibers of the spinal cord. This technology, combined with what's in development now, really has far-reaching implications. Absolutely fascinating.

  13. What If..... on Withered brain cells restored (in monkeys, anyway) · · Score: 2

    What if this technology were used with head transplants (reported a week or two or three ago here on Slashdot)? We're one step closer to immortality. Scientists and Doctors would use cloning to create the rest of the body, transplant the head to the new body, and revive dying brain cells. The only technology we're really missing out on now is reconnecting the spinal cord and all the nerves, and I'm sure that will be developing soon enough. It's incredible to think that maybe by the end of my lifetime (I'm 18 now) the technology will exist to extend my life another 80 or 90 or 300 years. I'm sure I speak for a lot of us when I say that I'd love to see what technology develops after my "regular" life span has come to an end. It would be incredible to be able to extend life using this technologies. Incredible.