You do have to copy the folder manually...
Which is kinda the point.
My in-laws get their Vista upgrade disk in the post. It has "Microsoft Vista New Lovely Wow" written all over it, and they've heard me mention Vista (only in a "the shop said you're gonna get an update disk" way).
They attempt to install, and bork, their (almost) brand-new computer.
My point is, a lot of people who bought PCs in the last six months were sold/promised a Vista upgrade. A lot of these people have NEVER installed or upgraded an OS. Ever.
Here's where I get modded troll.
Vista is a horribly bloated nightmare of building on legacy code (forever), kernel fudges and (yep) DRM. Been said before, but Microsoft would do a lot better starting from scratch for the next "Windows".
One last point. Those people who "need" Vista for DX10 and gaming... buy a PS3 or xbox and f*&@... erm, go away
When we receive payment for copyright infringement or obtain a court judgment and collect on it, you will earn 5% of the amount which is collected as actual damages. In the event of multiple identical submissions, the first one received by AFAC will receive the reward. The reward is paid only for the actual pages for which we receive payment or collect on a judgment. In our most recent infringement claim, the total actual damages for copyright infringement is $600,000 - which meant you would have earned $30,000!
I'm reporting all of you for cacheing her site in your browsers.
Completely agree.
Before I start, I'll just clarify - I'm talking about native BBC content, not programmes made by third-party producers.
I've never understood how BBC DVDs (and video cassettes before them) cost the same as, if not more than, Hollywood movies. As license-fee payers, we've already paid for production once, so should only be paying for materials and distribution to own a copy.
As the method of distribution is peer to peer they should be paying us (or at least those of us with fat pipes!) to distribute it. Plus, we should be able to keep it, as if we'd bought it on DVD.
All that has changed is the distribution method. Why change what we can do with the content?
2)
Who's to say that the Aliens arent God, who put us here in the first place? Me, and anyone else with an iota of sense. I can't completely discount it, but it is highly unlikely. I'd dig out some references, but you wouldn't read them anyway.
3)
Who's to say that the Milky Way isnt 10% populated (1 habited planetary body per solar system)? Again, me. Most solar systems are unable support a habitable planet. Prove me wrong, but I'm only basing this on all the science I've ever seen.
This isn't needed - not if you have already convinced your kids that everything they do online is recorded, even though it isn't. That makes them think before they do anything you wouldn't want them to.
...by 2010, the number of NASA's Earth-observing missions will drop dramatically... By 2010? Is this just an excuse to turn all the cameras on Jupiter?
Well, I guess I'm off to find the guy whose job it is to design shoelaces! Mundane? I have to think long and hard about which aglets to use, you insensitive clod.
Slashdot Mirror
Just because you might have a miserable experience playing with untested and unrefined software,
Untested and unrefined? Are you kidding? You know how much beta testing they did?
BTW, how much should I pay for this "untested and unrefined software"?
Really?
You do have to copy the folder manually... Which is kinda the point.
My in-laws get their Vista upgrade disk in the post. It has "Microsoft Vista New Lovely Wow" written all over it, and they've heard me mention Vista (only in a "the shop said you're gonna get an update disk" way). They attempt to install, and bork, their (almost) brand-new computer. My point is, a lot of people who bought PCs in the last six months were sold/promised a Vista upgrade. A lot of these people have NEVER installed or upgraded an OS. Ever. Here's where I get modded troll. Vista is a horribly bloated nightmare of building on legacy code (forever), kernel fudges and (yep) DRM. Been said before, but Microsoft would do a lot better starting from scratch for the next "Windows". One last point. Those people who "need" Vista for DX10 and gaming... buy a PS3 or xbox and f*&@... erm, go away
Rich at last! Muwahahahahahaha.
Sudo Kudos? Has this got something to do with putting the numbers 1-9 in the right boxes? In DOS? Arrrgghhhhh.
Yes, but does it run.... oh.
A friend of mine used it for advantage, erm, sort of. His email address is (censored, obviously!) Kevin*******IsA@hotmail.com
that I'm the first to point out that the 33rd most popular petition is for Tony Blair to stand on his head and juggle ice-cream.
Completely agree. Before I start, I'll just clarify - I'm talking about native BBC content, not programmes made by third-party producers.
I've never understood how BBC DVDs (and video cassettes before them) cost the same as, if not more than, Hollywood movies. As license-fee payers, we've already paid for production once, so should only be paying for materials and distribution to own a copy.
As the method of distribution is peer to peer they should be paying us (or at least those of us with fat pipes!) to distribute it. Plus, we should be able to keep it, as if we'd bought it on DVD. All that has changed is the distribution method. Why change what we can do with the content?
And it's a silent 'p'.
Prepare to feel the wrath of InterNIC's Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy.
Yours faithfully,
Mr. QtEQpK1jGnm
Yep, and if you're in the UK you can probably get subsidies and have the PM shut down the investigation into how corrupt your arms company is.
Just when I flopped a straight, too.
How wonderfully slashdot.
Yep, it's in Ephseses... Ephessiaa... effeeasy... Damn it, everything you don't like is in there if you read it hard enough.
1) There are only eight planets. Do keep up.
2) Who's to say that the Aliens arent God, who put us here in the first place? Me, and anyone else with an iota of sense. I can't completely discount it, but it is highly unlikely. I'd dig out some references, but you wouldn't read them anyway.
3) Who's to say that the Milky Way isnt 10% populated (1 habited planetary body per solar system)? Again, me. Most solar systems are unable support a habitable planet. Prove me wrong, but I'm only basing this on all the science I've ever seen.
Now to flamebait back... I bet you voted Bush.
Hey! I'm 33, and you said you wouldn't talk about me on here, you insensitive poop-head.
This isn't needed - not if you have already convinced your kids that everything they do online is recorded, even though it isn't. That makes them think before they do anything you wouldn't want them to.
Am I evil?
...by 2010, the number of NASA's Earth-observing missions will drop dramatically... By 2010? Is this just an excuse to turn all the cameras on Jupiter?I thwart your plan with my semantic nitpicking.