"I wondered why they threw iLife in there."
I can't even believe you asked that question.
They put iLife in there because many developers write applications that interface (or supplement iLife).
Sure it will be XML. It will be that embraced and extended XML M$ keeps talking about...
Sure you'll give us the details, but a non-standard XML implementation isn't really "open".
How will I get my 2400 bps modem to connect up to American Online?
At my company its:
36:1 if you count only onshore IT
22:1 if you count onshore IT + Offshore
Of course since it takes about 4 of *our* offshore people to equate to one useful person onshore, that would change the ratio 31:1.
There aren't many members of that club (IBM, HP, Sun)
keeping everyone around on the weekends and evenings to fix all the 2007 DST issues.
Maybe these guys should try innovating in their software, rather than their publicity stunts.
No Digg! Oh... never mind.
The hackers will be making it sing like Sinatra.
It's free publicity for FexEx. And now, it's all negative!
Dear Slashdot: please don't post about this. Screw you guys.
Mwah ha ha ha ha haaaa!
"I wondered why they threw iLife in there." I can't even believe you asked that question. They put iLife in there because many developers write applications that interface (or supplement iLife).
Sure it will be XML. It will be that embraced and extended XML M$ keeps talking about... Sure you'll give us the details, but a non-standard XML implementation isn't really "open".