Slashdot Mirror


User: uw_badgers

uw_badgers's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
14
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 14

  1. Re:what does this accomplish on FTC Fines Xanga for Violating Kids' Privacy · · Score: 2, Informative

    First, Xanga does have users enter a birthday when signing up, and if the birthdate shows a person is not 13, they cannot sign up.

    Now they do, but apparently there was a period of time where they didn't check the birthdate, and 1.7 million children under 13 signed up. From the MSNBC article:

    "Children merely had to check a box confirming they were over 13, according to FTC lawyer Mary Engle -- even if they'd previously entered a birth date indicating they were under 13."

  2. Re:worth watching on Shuttle Cameras Yield Excellent Footage · · Score: 1
    For the one video linked, I'm amazed it didn't get slashdotted immediately.

    I think that is because the video is hosted on Akamai, which has a robust network of servers around the world, designed to handle exactly these type of high bandwidth files. I think Slashdotting only affects smaller sites that only have a few servers. I don't think a Slashdot link to a large site like CNN.com is going to affect its performance.

  3. Re:Organizations behave like this... on Student Faces Expulsion for Blog Post · · Score: 1
    If this kid gets expelled, he's screwed.

    Actually, not necessarily. I heard of some kids that were expelled for cheating from a top high school. It was no big deal. They transferred to another top high school. The high schools cannot notify colleges about the expulsion unless specifically asked by the college.

  4. Re:No! Lawyers aren't suing him, he's suing them! on iPod Lawsuit Lawyers Sue Their Own Plaintiff? · · Score: 1

    If I read it right they are not asking that he be held accountable for the fees from suing Apple if they lose the Apple case, but instead they are asking that he be held accountable for their fees defending themselves against his suit should they be found not liable.

    Ah, that makes sense. I had thought that they wanted to be reimbursed for the Apple lawsuit.

  5. Re:No! Lawyers aren't suing him, he's suing them! on iPod Lawsuit Lawyers Sue Their Own Plaintiff? · · Score: 1

    I don't know the merits of Mr. Tomczak's case, but it is clear that he is suing the iPod Lawsuit Lawyers, not the other way around.

    You forgot step 5:
    5.) In their Motions to Strike my case against them, they also requested of the Court that I be held financially responsible for their attorneys' fees and costs.

    I don't know if that technically qualifies as a countersuit by the law firm, but in effect it's a countersuit.

  6. existing browser-based spreadsheets? on VisiCalc Creator Developing WikiCalc · · Score: 1

    Are there any currently existing broswer-based, sharable, editable spreadsheets? Or a place that hosts a sandbox for wikiCalc? I couldn't find a place to test out wikiCalc online.

  7. Re:3 Email Heads Walk into a Bar... on 3 Email Chiefs Come to Dinner · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Gmail is still clearly the best of web-based mail services.

    Have you seen the new Yahoo Mail beta?

    But even before the Yahoo Mail beta, I never liked Gmail's interface. The buttons and links are not user friendly, it's inconsistent where to look to find a function. Way too cluttery, especially for Google, which prides itself on minimalism.

  8. Re:The link in the article is wrong. Fixed link he on Google WiFi+VPN Confirmed · · Score: 1
    why would it only be available in the SF bay area?

    If it's VPN, that's a lot of bandwidth. I'm guessing that there's no way they can handle that much traffic through their VPN servers, so they're limiting to one region first.

  9. Re:no dilution on Google Files to Sell 14.2 Million More Shares · · Score: 1
    You are completely mistaken. There is no dilution. While more shares are issued, the amount of assets Google has will increase by $4bln. Therefore the amount of assets per share remains exactly the same and the share price (at least theoretically, assuming efficient markets) is not affected.

    Is Google selling $4B dollars of stock, or 14M shares of stock? In other words, can they set the price of the offering, or is it subject to market price?

    What about a theoretical example that they double their outstanding shares through a secondary offering. Will they still be able to sell the new shares at $300?

  10. old news on Another Stab at Laptop Security · · Score: 1

    I read about the exact same idea at least 5 years ago.

  11. Re:Okay, the submission summary is odd on Mac Install-Base Shown to Be 16% · · Score: 1

    Wow, this was the most insightful comment in the entire thread. (Moderators, bump this up!). Based on my perception, Mac users really frown upon copying software, whereas Windows users copy software frequently (especially outside the U.S.), and Linux users just get it for free. =)

  12. Re:Let me see if I can follow this. on Mac Install-Base Shown to Be 16% · · Score: 1

    According to the article, the Software Publishers Associations estimates that 16% of users are on Macs. Depending on the definition of "on", it can allow for the possibility for some of the 16% to also use other systems (in other words, not mutually exclusive). So it could be possible that 16% of users are on Macs and 99% of users are on x86.

  13. Re:Check the facts again on Mac Install-Base Shown to Be 16% · · Score: 1
    Just because a machine has never been infected by a virus or other malicious software is absolutely NO indication of what OS its running.

    Although the article title is misleading, it does not make the claim you stated.

  14. Re:no virus != apple. on Mac Install-Base Shown to Be 16% · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Just because it doesn't have a virus or malware on it, doesn't mean it is an Apple computer.

    Although highly misleading, technically, the article's title does not claim that all computer without viruses are Macs. It's claiming that 16% of users do not have viruses because they use Macs. That statement does not preclude the possibility of additional (non-Mac) users that do not have viruses because they practice safe computing.