Some people download firefox to try it, but chose to keep ie as standard browser. After all, it has a searchbox and tabs as well. Those visible features made firefox something special when you looked at it for the first time. (And you hadn't seen a browser other than ie.)
I wonder, is this a strategy? Are there any good reasons not to support the standards? 'cause Microsofts developpers know about the css problems in IE, don't they?
Slashdot Mirror
Firefox takes much more time to start, and it slows down a lot with flash sites.
Some people download firefox to try it, but chose to keep ie as standard browser. After all, it has a searchbox and tabs as well. Those visible features made firefox something special when you looked at it for the first time. (And you hadn't seen a browser other than ie.)
you can take your apps (or at least some of them) with you today: http://portableapps.com/
you can't sync, 'though
I wonder, is this a strategy? Are there any good reasons not to support the standards?
'cause Microsofts developpers know about the css problems in IE, don't they?