Slashdot Mirror


Help Make Firefox On Mac Suck Less

bluephone writes "Colin Barrett, one of the new Mac geniuses, and an Adium developer, has posted an entry on his blog offering an open call to all Mac users of Firefox asking them, 'What sucks about Firefox on the Mac?' He says he already knows about and is trying to solve such things as: 'Native Form Widgets (currently scheduled for Firefox 3), Keychain Integration, Firefox should have a Unified toolbar (not completely hopeless, it turns out), Performance...', but he wants to hear what else Mac users want from Firefox. So please, if you're a user of Macs and the interwebs, then RTFA, unclog your tubes, and send him your ideas."

375 comments

  1. Camino by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this what Camino is for? Like, the very reason for its existence?

    I.e., taking the Mozilla/Gecko codebase, and making a lean, fast browser with Mac widgets, tight Mac OS X integration, Keychain support, and so on?

    I understand the goal of trying to get more Mac-specific functionality into Firefox, but with a fundamentally cross-platform browser, inasmuch as it goes, it's been harder to integrate platform-specific features and functionality into Firefox proper. That's the reason Camino was born: to be a more agile project that is focused on making such a browser for Mac OS X using Mozilla/Gecko. For folks who don't need specific Firefox functionality or Firefox extensions, Camino is already the answer.

    1. Re:Camino by kadat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Although I'm not a Mac user myself and can't say anything in the matter of usability on Mac OS, I use Firefox on both Windows and Linux mainly because of its extensions as they provide great functionality. Firefox without the plugins is not Firefox anymore, they're one of its most significant features.

    2. Re:Camino by GundamFan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is exactly why I love Firefox, no mater what OS I am currently using on a box, I have access to a browser I know how to use. In this way projects like Firefox and OO.org may contribute to the end of desktop OS monopolies.

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    3. Re:Camino by mike2R · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I use Camino on the Mac because Firefox is just too clunky, but I do miss the extensions - and have to keep Firefox for occasional use of those extensions I can't live without (Webdeveloper toolbar principly).

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    4. Re:Camino by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh, Camino is not ghetto. Many people who work on it are the same people who also work on Firefox. The lead Camino developers already work for the Mozilla Foundation. And since its purpose is to take the preexisting Mozilla/Gecko codebase and simply add the Mac OS X-specific functionality, I can't see any logic in your answer: most of what makes up Camino is what you're already using in Firefox.

      And since when do we denigrate open source software as "ghetto" if everyone on the project isn't paid (which is frankly the same as a lot of the work product that goes into Firefox)? How did this even get modded up? Have you ever even used Camino?

    5. Re:Camino by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's funny how round here choice is a good thing until it comes to Firefox. Then it's a case of 'but its the bestest browser in the multiverse, why would you want to use anything else?'. Firefox is not the be all and end all of browsers. Some people like to have alternatives.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    6. Re:Camino by zentex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Isn't this what Camino is for? Like, the very reason for its existence?

      yes, it is. When I first got my MAC, I didn't like Safari so I *tolerated* Firefox. After much complaining to a group of friends they suggested Camino, and I was instantly sold.

      Sure, the releases are slow to hit market, but it's integration and functionality (not to mention it's clean look) out-weighs all else.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    7. Re:Camino by Anonymous+Sniper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Camino sucks because it doesn't do firefox extensions, and CMD+[1-9] doesn't switch tabs.

      There are probably others, but the lack of extensions had me running back to firefox within 10 minutes of trying Camino. Oh, and because I use Firefox on other platforms and I'd rather it acted similarly on all of them.

      Firefox however sucks due to the lack of keychain integration, and because it doesn't read the system proxy settings. Form widgets doens't bother me at all - in fact, I prefer the current setup.

      Cheers.

      -t

    8. Re:Camino by encoderer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok... have you ever actually ran into a browser that you DON'T know how to use? Aren't they basically all the same?

    9. Re:Camino by FranklinDelanoBluth · · Score: 1, Informative

      Camino still lacks very simple functionality and it does not support all the myriad plugins that Firefox does. Just a simple example, Ctrl+Click doesn't open in a new tab.

      I like Firefox a lot on the Mac. In fact my only complaint is performance - (e.g. a total virtual memory footprint ~700MB on a machine with only 512MB physical RAM!!!!!!).

    10. Re:Camino by anagama · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Many people who work on it are the same people who also work on Firefox.
      Perhaps then they can work on what drove me away from Camino -- the way it stores login data. If one site has two different logins (eg, gallery and blog), Camino barfs and remembers only one. Firefox can remember both. Or at least this was true some months ago when I finally got fed up with Camino, trashed it, and went back to Firefox.
      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    11. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I have misunderstood your comment (since control click on a Mac is equivalent to a right click to bring up a pop-up menu) but command-clicking on a link opens it in a new tab in both Camino and Firefox.

    12. Re:Camino by xtracto · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      (people not imported straight from Indian grad schools, thank you Microsoft for playing)

      Racist much?

      What the fuck do you have against Engineers in England? one of the advantages of open source is that it is open to everyone and anyone IN THE WORLD who wants to contribute. And what a best place to be educated than an Open Source project were "people imported straight from indian grad schools" can improve their coding skills and can be flamed because of their errors ?

      Oh, I take that you believe that only the average White Skin Kukuxclan-American programmers are good enough for Open Source developing? Hate to break it to you but several of the head open source developers pionners are NOT caucasian (Miguel de Icaza comes to mind).

      Sheesh...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    13. Re:Camino by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yes, but maintaining Firefox for OSX and Camino isn't necessarily ideal. It's probably a little bit of a duplication of effort for developers, and it might confuse users a little regarding which browser they should be using.

      One of the major features of Firefox is its extensions. Camino can't use Firefox extensions, but Firefox doesn't quite integrate into the OS. It'd be nice if they could somehow close the gap.

    14. Re:Camino by SamTheButcher · · Score: 1

      I've used Camino and it's not that great of an app. Plus, as others have said, the cross-platform-ness of FF is a Good Thing where I work, where Macs & PCs are used side-by-side and familiarity is key.

    15. Re:Camino by Phisbut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok... have you ever actually ran into a browser that you DON'T know how to use? Aren't they basically all the same?

      They're all the same, except for what differentiate them. When you're used to keyboard shortcuts and added features that increase your productivity, using a browser that doesn't have them, even though it's still a browser and can still display web pages, will be a much slower and more frustrating experience.

      I use Firefox constantly. I love the Ctrl+L shortcut that gives focus to the address bar. I love how I can simply type "slashdot" then hit Ctrl+Shift+Enter to have it turned into "http://www.slashdot.org". I love keyword bookmarks too. I know the Google search bar is right there, I haven't found the keyboard shortcut to access it though, but it doesn't matter because of keyword bookmarks. I wanna google the word "Safari"? Ctrl+L gg safari Enter. I wanna see the Wikipedia entry on Safari? Ctrl+L wiki safari Enter. I wanna see the definition of the word "Safari"? Ctrl+L dict safari Enter.

      While the main functionality of all browsers is the same, it's those little added features that make a cross-platform browser even more enjoyable.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    16. Re:Camino by porl · · Score: 1

      did you ever submit a bug report or feature request?

    17. Re:Camino by harsha_c · · Score: 1

      I know the Google search bar is right there, I haven't found the keyboard shortcut to access it though ...

      The keyboard shortcut for the search bar is Ctrl + K.
      --
      Welcome to the world of IE development. By incompetent retards, for incompetent retards, led by an incompetent retard
    18. Re:Camino by fangorious · · Score: 4, Informative

      ctrl+k puts the cursor in the search bar, ctrl+up/ctrl+down cycles between search engines

    19. Re:Camino by constantnormal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      mod the parent posting up!

      Mr Schroeder is EXACTLY correct -- Camino uses the same Gecko core as Firefox, but eschews the Firefox plugin madness in favor of OS X integration, supporting the OS X Services menu, Keychain, and all the other things that tie an OS X application into the body of OS X.

      If a person wants to use the same browser across Windows, OS X, and Linux -- or has the desire to customize the hell out of it via plugins, then Firefox is the way to go. If a person wants a lean browser that takes advantage of the feature-rich environment of OS X, then Camino is the right answer.

      But if a person wants a lean, fully-integrated-with-OSX browser that looks and behaves like Firefox and supports a zoo of customizing plugins, they're in a world of hurt, as they are looking for the same thing as those seeking a rich, sugary, calorie-laden diet that they can lose weight with.

      The whole notion of Firefox is to make the best cross-platform browser possible. By definition, this means not tying it to the feature set of any particular platform. However, to permit users to tailor their own favorite features into Firefox, they have an excellent plugin system of extensions.

      The idea of Camino is to take the excellent Gecko core from Firefox, and tie it into a particular feature-rich environment (i.e., OS X), making it as fast and powerful as possible. You don't do that by allowing the user to load it down with a bunch of plugins.

      The problem posed by the topic has already been solved. If the Firefox developers want to make it better for OS X users, they should ask the Camino developers (metaphorically across the aisle) what they would like to see changed in Firefox to make Camino development better. Camino IS the end result of optimizing Firefox for OS X.

    20. Re:Camino by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just want FF to not crash so much in OS X. I'm multiplatform, keeping functionality and extensions is important. Camino seems to be most relevant if you never want to move your profile between platforms. I can do that in a few minutes, and have done that several times. The extension compatibility is important because there are very few good extensions for Mac-only browsers, the genetic "depth" of the available extensions is very shallow, I've come across too many circumstances where FF has a few alternates to try to do a task, the Mac-only stuff might only have one extension that does a task and it doesn't do it very well.

    21. Re:Camino by twbecker · · Score: 1

      I think that MoCo tolerates Camino since they know FF isn't up to snuff on the Mac platform. But there's no question that having 1 browser for Macs and another for everything else isn't a situation they want to be in. Some of the folks around Camino already feel like they get the cold shoulder from MoCo; once FF gets a reasonable level of integration with OS X, I think MoCo will all but disown the project.

      --
      "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
    22. Re:Camino by codemoose · · Score: 0

      Command-K to access the Google search bar - on Mac, of course. CTRL-K on Windows.

    23. Re:Camino by Nimey · · Score: 1

      w3m. lynx at first. That horrible line-mode browser, "www" or somesuch.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    24. Re:Camino by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      That's because camino stores login data in the keychain- the cross application OSX credential store.

      That way it's accessible from other applications that have keychain access. in other words, it's designed that way.

    25. Re:Camino by fangorious · · Score: 1

      I believe the 2.x release will support multiple logins. The last time I used a dev release of 2.x it works like Safari. After entering your Keychain password the form is populated with one of the saved username/password pairs, you just start typing the correct username, and it will autocomplete, and then populate the password field based on what username you typed in.

    26. Re:Camino by rollercoaster375 · · Score: 1

      Of course it doesn't. Command+Click does. Command takes the place of Ctrl in any windows shortcut on OS X.

    27. Re:Camino by zeath · · Score: 2, Informative

      I love the Ctrl+L shortcut that gives focus to the address bar.

      I have yet to see a browser for which F6 does not provide the same functionality. Mozilla's Firefox Keyboard Shortcut page doesn't even mention it. Granted you won't find the 'gg' or 'wiki' pseudo-commands in, say, IE, but F6 still does its job. As for the search bar, I'm not sure if there is a shortcut to get into there directly, but I do know you can tab into it once you have the focus in the address bar. This assumes, probably, that you don't have any other input field between the address and search bars in the toolbar. The Firefox help page does mention that Ctrl+Up and Ctrl+Down will let you cycle through the search engines, too.

    28. Re:Camino by vertinox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ok... have you ever actually ran into a browser that you DON'T know how to use? Aren't they basically all the same?

      Take Ad block plug for Firefox. It works on OS X, Windows, and Linux.

      Off the top of my head I don't know how you would acheive the same thing in IE, Safari, or Camino.

      I'm sure it could be done, but I don't want to have to spend anymore time than I have to when I'm working cross platform. If I learn it once on Firefox on any OS then I know exactly where to find the menu on another.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    29. Re:Camino by zeath · · Score: 1

      As my sibling posts indicated, it is indeed Ctrl-K for the web search. Apparently I decided to ignore that last line on the keyboard shortcuts page.

    30. Re:Camino by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      I liked Camino. . . until they inexplicably removed the bookmark sidebar. For whatever reason they seemed to want to emulate Safari, which lacks such an obviously useful feature. And I also like extensions, so there.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    31. Re:Camino by NickCatal · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. I use FF exclusively on both my Windows and Mac comps. The amount of times FF on Mac crashes is simply unacceptable.

      --
      -nick
    32. Re:Camino by Clock+Nova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why don't the just add in the plugin architecture to Camino and let the users decide whether or not they want to "load it down" with extensions. Seriously. There's no logic in their decision at all.

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
    33. Re:Camino by eat+here_get+gas · · Score: 0, Redundant

      ..."They're all the same, except for what differentiate them."... Um, so, then they're not really the same after all?

      --
      the significance of a signature is insignificant
    34. Re:Camino by woadlined · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Camino uses the same Gecko core as Firefox, but eschews the Firefox plugin madness in favor of OS X integration, supporting the OS X Services menu, Keychain, and all the other things that tie an OS X application into the body of OS X."

      FF is meant to be customizable. If you want to use a plugin, you use it. If you don't - brace yourself - you don't have to. No one is twisting your arm.

      The OS X environment - everything about it - is about removing customization from the picture. The Mac folks are the ones who decide what features are best, most useful, most necessary. Their vision of what the environment should be is the one that you must accept as best.

      Want to do something else with your computer? Forget it. Why would you want to? If the Mac folks haven't envisioned it, it's worthless. No enhancements are necessary, or will be tolerated.

      Want to use a little feature on your browser? What are you - a Heathen?

    35. Re:Camino by nick5000 · · Score: 1

      The reason I don't use Camino is that it has no support for Firefox extensions. The answer to the question is to give Camino Firefox's functionality, for extensions and otherwise.

    36. Re:Camino by Locklin · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly. The only thing I miss with camino is that it doesn't have support for firefox extensions. If it had that, there would be no reason to use the mainline firefox for mac.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    37. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing I'm left wondering, is whether or not OS X is a feature rich environment. The feature rich sentences in your feature rich post leave me wondering if OS X is a feature rich environment.

    38. Re:Camino by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not so much being able to use a browser, it's more to do with using a browser without being consumed by an all encompassing rage, which causes you to scream curses upon the soul of whoever designed the interface.

    39. Re:Camino by chanrobi · · Score: 2, Informative

      I love how I can simply type "slashdot" then hit Ctrl+Shift+Enter to have it turned into "http://www.slashdot.org". I love how I can simply type "slashdot" then hit Enter to have it turned into "http://www.slashdot.org" in opera.
    40. Re:Camino by coleridge78 · · Score: 1

      You're totally nuts, and have obviously have no idea what you're talking about. I dare you to give me examples of things you can customize on Windows which you can't on a Mac. I dare you. I'll be waiting...

    41. Re:Camino by Phisbut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love how I can simply type "slashdot" then hit Enter to have it turned into "http://www.slashdot.org" in opera.

      I haven't used Opera in a while. Tell me, is that because www.slashdot.org is in your bookmarks and it automatically adds the right tld for single-word URLs, or is it because Opera appends ".com" every time, and slashdot.com redirects to slashdot.org? If slashdot.com was a different site than slashdot.org, would you still get to the right page every time? Does Opera have some sort of magical I-can-read-your-mind feature?

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    42. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used Camino and it's not that great of an app. Plus, as others have said, the cross-platform-ness of FF is a Good Thing where I work, where Macs & PCs are used side-by-side and familiarity is key.


      Yes, that's fine.. but for those of us who use Macs most the time Camino offers a more Mac-like environment. Firefox (along with Openoffice) sucks the big one on the Mac.
    43. Re:Camino by Haiyadragon · · Score: 1

      Firefox uses Google's "I feel lucky" feature for this. Except for speed and mdi Opera has nothing on Firefox.

    44. Re:Camino by jZnat · · Score: 1

      There have already been articles on /. that point out that the CS requirements in India and BA requirements in general are analogous to a high school education in the US, and as any person who has gone through the US education system would know, is still completely awful and often leaves its graduates dumber than when they started high school.

      Also, collaboration with people from India is still lacking. It'd be easier to do it via the methods used in many open source projects, but Microsoft won't use them (NIH syndrome).

      Although, I'd expect that Indian developers who contribute to open source projects in their spare time are probably more qualified since they obviously have some sort of passion for computer science.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    45. Re:Camino by Voline · · Score: 1

      Some of the (to me at least) most desirable Firefox extensions are available in Camino with the add-on CamiTools. These include Flashblock, Adblock, and Bookmark syncing. I've been using them it for a year and it does not seem to adversely affect speed or stability.

    46. Re:Camino by jZnat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it makes you feel any better, Firefox doesn't integrate with anything on any of its platforms. On Windows, it does its own thing usually (although it follows the UI guidelines for Windows pretty well). On Mac OS X, it doesn't integrate at all with the dozens of services that would be very useful for a web browser. On Linux/BSD/etc., it hardly integrates with GNOME (similar to how it "integrates" with Windows, just using the graphical toolkit and UI guidelines doesn't count as integration), and when it comes to KDE, you might as well use Konqueror because Firefox is Peter Griffin in the Million Man March.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    47. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. fracking. extensions.

    48. Re:Camino by Ergonomicon · · Score: 1

      Three important reasons: Extensions, extensions, extensions.

    49. Re:Camino by thinksInCode · · Score: 1

      For folks who don't need specific Firefox functionality or Firefox extensions, Camino is already the answer. That's true. But, there are some of us that want Firefox functionality/extensions and a native look and feel. While this is somewhat possible with some of the great themes for Firefox (like GrApple), it's still not native integration.
    50. Re:Camino by jcgf · · Score: 1

      I love how I can simply type "slashdot" then hit Ctrl+Shift+Enter to have it turned into "http://www.slashdot.org". Leave out the shift and you will be 33% more productive, and it works on IE too.
    51. Re:Camino by sconest · · Score: 2, Informative

      I love how I can simply type "slashdot" then hit Ctrl+Shift+Enter to have it turned into "http://www.slashdot.org". I love how I can simply type "slashdot" then hit Enter to have it turned into "http://www.slashdot.org" in opera. I love how I can simply type "/." then hit Enter to have it turned into "http://www.slashdot.org" in opera. :)
      --
      Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
    52. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used both and Camino is not a feature for feature adaptation of Firefox to the Mac environment. There were a couple of features missing, albeit probably insignificant features to most people, that caused me to move back to using Firefox. One example, I really like the "Page Info" that Firefox provides under Tools. That doesn't exist on Camino as far as I know.

    53. Re:Camino by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      The problem posed by the topic has already been solved.


      Um, no it hasn't. The problem is not "How do we remove everything useful about Firefox and make it Safari with a different rendering engine?". The problem is "how do we make Firefox, with ALL its functionality including extensions, a more integrated application on the Mac?"

      I could understand the desire for Camino back when Safari was less than great. But Safari rocks now, it's a great browser. The only thing it's missing are all the great extensions that the FF community has developed.
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    54. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the 2.x release will support multiple logins. The last time I used a dev release of 2.x it works like Safari. After entering your Keychain password the form is populated with one of the saved username/password pairs, you just start typing the correct username, and it will autocomplete, and then populate the password field based on what username you typed in.

      Um... no it didn't. No version of Camino, development or otherwise, currently supports what you describe. It may in 2.x, but the code for it doesn't exist yet.

    55. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a Mac, became a mac fanboy a couple of years back, but as one quick example - UI customsation. On my Mac I can basically customise the highlight colour, and that's about it.

    56. Re:Camino by aztektum · · Score: 1

      i dunno what the other guy is talkin' about but when i type "slashdot" into firefox and hit enter it goes there. and i even tried it on a computer where slashdot had never been opened so it wasn't cached. *shrug*

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    57. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In Windows I can choose my shell, file manager, icon set, window theme, etc. None of these can be done on the Mac without cracking into the deepest part of the OS with illegal tools.

    58. Re:Camino by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      What you did actually does an "I'm Feeling Lucky" Google search for "Slashdot." What he did (ctrl-shift-enter) inserts the http:// and .org and fetches the site normally. (By the way, ctrl-enter appends .com and shift-enter appends .net.)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    59. Re:Camino by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Ctrl-enter goes to http://slashdot.com , not .org.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    60. Re:Camino by Domini · · Score: 1

      As a Mac user I have tried using Camino, and I can say that, yes, It has cool features, but I cannot do without a myriad of plugins for Firefox... Camino is not as extensible when it comes to plugins.

      The plugins I use:

      AdblockPlus (Camino has this... sorta)
      DownThemAll! (Great downloader... the built in downloaders all suck. Will have to go back to iGetter)
      FoxyTunes (Can do without)
      Google Browser Sync (I GOTTA have this)
      Google Notebook (Can do without)
      Google Toolbar (Can do without)
      Page Update Checker (Can do without)

      I think that Camino is indeed faster than lighter than firefox (which is a hog sometimes) with better Keychain and other integration, but it's a plugin dead-end.

      That said, I'm still thinking of using it...

    61. Re:Camino by Buran · · Score: 1

      I tried Camino. It didn't support Extensions. I trashed Camino. Extensions are just too useful to me to stop where the browser devs thought I should stop. If Firefox can become more OS-integrated, I'll be happy, but it doesn't suck for me, so far.

    62. Re:Camino by Phisbut · · Score: 1
      Ctrl+Enter = .com
      Shift+Enter = .net
      Ctrl+Shift+Enter = .org

      There are many situations where domain.com and domain.org are not the same thing.

      --
      After 3 days without programming, life becomes meaningless
      - The Tao of Programming
    63. Re:Camino by Domini · · Score: 1

      Oh, yes, and VERY importantly...

      Both Firefox and Opera can remember open tabs... this is a show-stopper for me currently with the lack in Camino.

    64. Re:Camino by andy9701 · · Score: 1

      I love how I can simply type "/." then hit Enter to have it turned into "http://www.slashdot.org" in opera. :)


      You can do this in Firefox, too. Just bookmark slashdot.org, and set the keyword to "/.".
    65. Re:Camino by woadlined · · Score: 1

      Who said word one about Mac/Windows? Not I. Easy, EASY, partner.

    66. Re:Camino by Buran · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out ShapeShifter and Candybar. They change the theme and icon theme, respectively.

      And they aren't illegal, like the GP suggested.

    67. Re:Camino by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't this post off-topic?

      The topic is how to improve Firefox on OS X, not "hey let's talk about Camino, which is not Firefox!" Not that moderators ever mod anything off-topic around here...

      In any case, the biggest problem with Firefox is that the spell-checker doesn't integrate with the OS X spell-checker. I'm sick of every damned application using its own spell-checker on an OS with one built-in. Use the built-in one! Duh! I can't count the number of dictionaries I've had to add my last name to, on the same machine.

    68. Re:Camino by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Ctrl+Enter = .com
      Shift+Enter = .net
      Ctrl+Shift+Enter = .org
      And .gov?
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    69. Re:Camino by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Informative

      On Linux/BSD/etc., it hardly integrates with GNOME (similar to how it "integrates" with Windows, just using the graphical toolkit and UI guidelines doesn't count as integration), and when it comes to KDE, you might as well use Konqueror because Firefox is Peter Griffin in the Million Man March.

      There is a way to get Firefox to use its own file dialogs instead of the sucky GNOME dialogs. It's still not KDE, but at least it's more usable than GNOME.

      (The necessary files may be in a slightly different location; they are on Gentoo, which is what I use. You can also use this fix with Thunderbird to the same effect.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    70. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is no reason to say that Camino needs to suck.

      Yes, I agree that perhaps Camino does not need to have massive zoos of plugins... but to not have plugins is not necessarily the Mac way!

      There are a couple of things that any good browser should have, and when those features are not fully there, then at least plugins can be made and later be made part of the base system. Just like anyone these days would not use a browser without tabs. But also how tabs have become persistent. Any good browser worth it's salt will have persistent tabs across sessions. I used to use Opera, then started using Firefox with TabMixPlus plugin to save sessions, and now Fierefox has this built-in.

      Camino (still) does not have this.

      I daresasy that if OS X was pedantic about what add-in programs you could use then we would all still be using plain Safari. Fortunately we are given choices and we grow.

      Yea, sure, plugins can be messy, but you can choose not to use them if you don't want to. I'm using Firefox across 3 machines (2PC, 1Mac) all running Firefox and I'm using Google Browser Sync to sync my bookmarks. I'm not being lazy or anything... It's the only way to remaining sane.

      I think you are just scared of realizing that your idea of a perfect browser will be shattered if you encounter an augmentation that actually improves your idealized vision of how a browser could be. Just like change, plugins are a mixed blessing which eventually leads to growth as well.

      Camino is nipping itself in the bud if they are closed to this.

      On a side note, Camino *does* have plugin support, but it's not compatible with Firefox. (And not as plorific)

      http://pimpmycamino.com/parts/CaminoSession

      (I just checked this now again and see they finally have a pluging which may allow me to switch to it again - I used to use Camino a long time ago, but some things ended up annoying me a bit at the time.)

    71. Re:Camino by niall111 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ctrl+GWB+Enter = .gov? :(

    72. Re:Camino by tjohns · · Score: 2, Informative

      Camino can't support extensions because it doesn't use XUL for rendering its UI. If they used XUL, then they'd no longer feel like a native Mac app.

      Take a look at all of the cross platform frameworks out there. Qt+, Java, etc. I have never seen an app written with any of those frameworks that feels native on OS X. Widgets are ever so slightly different and are sized differently. Sheets don't exist on other systems. Tabs often appear as tabs rather than as a row of buttons. Apple's human interface guidelines differ from what would be expected on Windows. The keychain doesn't exist on other platforms. I could go on.

      Quite simply, there's no good way to write a cross platform app and make it feel native everywhere.

      Oh, and for what it's worth, Camino supports plugins. It just doesn't support Firefox's plugins.

    73. Re:Camino by Fahrenheit+450 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also, you can change the shell via NetInfo Manager and change your file manager by using something like PathFinder.

      --
      -30-
    74. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for two major benefits, Opera has nothing on Firefox?

      So we're ignoring the many single-key shortcuts (customizable I might add) that make browsing so much more efficient? Or the equivalent of 20 firefox extensions built in to an already slim download?

      While you're busy trying to find all the extensions that made firefox bearable to use, the Opera user has already been getting good use out of their original installation.

    75. Re:Camino by Myen · · Score: 1

      Around the IE4 time frame, an equivalent feature to bookmark keywords did exist - description. I have no idea where to get that anymore though, neither do I know if it still works...

    76. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1, Funny

      No points, though :-(

    77. Re:Camino by simpl3x · · Score: 1

      As I have been moving most services to GMail and such, my primary plugin is Browser Sync. Remembering my tabs is important! A couple of others, like FireBug, are pretty cool. I wish that Apple went with Mozilla and developed WebKit around the base.

      Camino should be Safari. Tabs and memory like Opera should be built into browsers at this point, and Safari/Camino should most definitely have the reduced page view perhaps in a more elegant manner. A widget/background view of updated pages would be pretty nifty -- isn't the browser just about our entire lives nowadays?

      For Mozilla, the core should be rock solid, and the interface clean. OS X touches are the things that increase application interactions -- Keychain...

    78. Re:Camino by coleridge78 · · Score: 1

      No, but since you specified OS X, there's really only way to take that. You intended to draw a contrast to systems which are configurable, in some way, that OS X isn't. You may have been talking about something besides Windows, fair enough. In which case, plug that system into my question and repeat. ;)

      I'm just looking for specific examples, is all. For example, someone else in this thread claimed you can't change your shell... was he kidding? You can change it the same way you can on any *nix system in the world, or through a GUI (NetInfo Manager) if you really want to. I'm just... wondering, because I've run into very few things that I can't configure in a straightforward manner. There have been about three things for which I've resorted to plist writes in the Terminal, but only about three--and they were insignificant things.

    79. Re:Camino by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Take Ad block plug for Firefox. It works on OS X, Windows, and Linux.

      Off the top of my head I don't know how you would acheive the same thing in IE, Safari, or Camino. From what I understand adblocking is standard in Camino, but point made nonetheless...
      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    80. Re:Camino by Octorian · · Score: 1

      Actually, properly written Java apps can look like native apps on MacOSX. In fact, aside from the menu bar issue, the widgets look native by default. (or at least they did when I was writing a Swing app on a PowerBook) There are even whole guides on how to write your Java apps so they do look/feel/work like native apps on OSX (and its all really minor top-level stuff), while still obviously working normally everywhere else.

    81. Re:Camino by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      My copy of firefox is sticking focus on the search bar, not the address bar, on F6.

    82. Re:Camino by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      What you did actually does an "I'm Feeling Lucky" Google search for "Slashdot." What he did (ctrl-shift-enter) inserts the http:// and .org and fetches the site normally. (By the way, ctrl-enter appends .com and shift-enter appends .net.)

      So what key-combo would one have to press when, say, you have "goatse" in the address bar?

      Or when you want to go to The Times, instead of the one of "Beaver County"? - "timesonline" (workplace safe)

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    83. Re:Camino by tjohns · · Score: 1

      Could you give some examples?

      I'm sure a properly written Java app can come close to a native OS X app, but I've never seen one that fit in perfectly. There's just always some little things that don't feel right, even if the widgets behave properly.

      It's not a fault of Java, I just think its the reality of cross platform programming. It's just plain hard to write an app that behaves properly in every environment.

    84. Re:Camino by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 5, Funny
      And .gov?

      In government there are no shortcuts.

    85. Re:Camino by klez23 · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, Camino does all those things you listed, exactly like Firefox. The only difference is the keyboard shortcut (which you said you didn't know) for google search (cmd-shift-L instead of cmd-K).

    86. Re:Camino by zeath · · Score: 1

      Interesting. It seems that F6 gives focus to the toolbar in general, not the address bar specifically. In my configuration I've always had the address bar as the first item. I just switched them to test that theory and it did indeed give focus to the search bar.

    87. Re:Camino by klez23 · · Score: 1

      That's not true. It's easy to change your shell (using NetInfo Manager, included with every copy of OSX). bash is default, and zsh, csh, ksh, wish, tcsh, tclsh are also included by default.

      File Manager is fairly easy to replace, though the only other decent option I know of is Path Finder.

      Icons are trivially easy to replace using the built in Finder's "get info" window-- just copy & paste 'em in there.

      Window themes are the only thing that are a bit of a hack to change (though certainly not "illegal")--the tools I know of are somewhat unstable, the best supposedly being ShapeShifter. But if I recall, it's a bit of a hack on windows as well...

      So yeah, I guess that makes you 25% right, 75% wrong.

    88. Re:Camino by scruffie · · Score: 1

      Cyberduck is written in Java, but I'd bet that you couldn't tell from using it. There's a difference between OS X apps written in Java using the Cocoa classes, which for all intensive purposes are native, and those that are written to be cross-platform using Swing (or whatever).

    89. Re:Camino by adona1 · · Score: 1

      However, is pressing Ctrl+Shift+Enter much of a time saver compared to actually typing .org?

      --
      Between the falling angel and the rising ape
    90. Re:Camino by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      You want shortcut keys for all the country-code TLDs? For that, you'll probably need an extension (not to mantion a space cadet keyboard!).

      On the other hand, having a standard shortcut key for one of them (i.e., the one corresponding to the current locale) might be useful...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    91. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to agree with this statement, and suppose Firefox should strive to adhere with web standards and be a superior cross-platform to give this cluster **c* we call the internet some fundamental baseline standards.

    92. Re:Camino by addaon · · Score: 1

      Not that moderators ever mod anything off-topic around here...

      I mod anything I don't like off topic!

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    93. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Camino (still) does not have this.

      Yes it does. It's in the nightly builds, and will be in the upcoming release.

      Camino is nipping itself in the bud if they are closed to this.

      Why do you think they are closed to it? Camino has a handful of volunteer developers, and an extension system is not trivial to build. You clearly haven't built an extension system for Camino, so does that mean you are closed to the idea?

      On a side note, Camino *does* have plugin support.

      Only for preferences at the moment. Everything else at that site that actually runs inside of Camino is a hack like Saft and PithHelmet.

    94. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supporting Firefox extensions means switching to XUL, which means completely abandoning the native interface... making it Firefox. How is that a solution?

    95. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's in the upcoming release.

    96. Re:Camino by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      Isn't this what Camino is for? Like, the very reason for its existence?

      Sure, Camino is that, in the same way way that Firefox, minus the extensions (which are the only reason I use it on a Mac)is nothing more than an IE for Windows that is 'better than IE), at least in theory. And you know what? As a Mac user who uses Windows and Linux, also, I say so what? "better than IE" wow! I am under-fucking-whelmed

      As I have said for a long time, if Mozilla/firefox can't be bothered to at least get Firefox to use the Services (menu) in Apple's APIs, fuck 'em, they should stop pretending they're good enough, or care enough, to be a Mac app, period.

      We'll 'get over it, don't worry.

      P.S. Latest nightlies for Safari make Camino redundant, also.

    97. Re:Camino by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      That's what OmniWeb ist for (and many other cool things ;-)

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    98. Re:Camino by HeroreV · · Score: 1

      Firefox's integration with KDE is some of the worst I've ever seen. Firefox still offers the "Set As Desktop Background..." option when running under KDE, but using it doesn't produce any results. It seems that Firefox does not even try to check to see if Gnome is even installed, much less running, before it sets the wallpaper for Gnome.

    99. Re:Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there is one thing worse than Mac Fanboys, and that's opera fanboys.

    100. Re:Camino by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Remember "Sorry, IE only" ? How stupid it is? Now fashion of top sites: "Sorry, IE and Firefox only". What if you dare (!) to use your operating systems default Safari browser?

      We hated monopolistic "IE only" but it became Duopoly now, "IE and FF only".

      Do I HAVE TO use Firefox? What if I want to use my operating systems default browser which is completely native and built on OS X frameworks?

      Camino gets same problem too. http://cm.my.yahoo.com/ , Yahoo beta doesn'T allow it in, even doesn't give a chance to go in without spoofing. If you really care, you spoof it and see it works perfectly obviously because they both share same code base.

      I must admit I never liked Mozilla family of browsers but never "hated" them either. Now these idiot webmasters still doing fascistic, 1990s fashion browser checks, I started to get irritated.

      Just like first thing I do is switching my browsers search from Google to Yahoo, not because Yahoo is excellent, I just don't want to get dictated what search engine to use.

    101. Re:Camino by Ambidisastrous · · Score: 1

      Brother, it's OK to chill sometimes. There are many ways to take that remark. To a Gnome or KDE user who doesn't know all the tricks for tweaking Macs, OS X seems like it's guided by strict rules. It's so... consistent. Of course OS X and Windows are both quite hackable, but they don't urge you to tweak them the way the main open-source desktop environments do. (Caveat -- Windows XP does compel me to spend hours modifying and adjusting it, but for different reasons.)

      Macs have a "cathedral" feel to them. Non-native apps are easy to spot. Other systems have a hack-at-will arrangement where most apps look neither out of place, nor particularly integrated, either. They just do, it's not personal.

      And that's why Camino and Firefox are different concepts -- and also why Epiphany seems like a stillborn idea to me (sorry!).

    102. Re:Camino by nnkx00 · · Score: 1

      Ctrl+Enter = *.com Ctrl+Shift+Enter = *.org Alt+Shift+enter = *.net

  2. Well... by Megane · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can think of one tiny thing that sucks on Mozilla on Mac... when ever I copy a bunch of text from a window, it puts bleeping CR line breaks in instead of LF line breaks. Unless I fix it first, it makes text editing act a bit wonky.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    1. Re:Well... by jesser · · Score: 1

      What app are you copying from and what app are you copying to? How will I be able to tell that something is wrong -- what do I do in the receiving app that will feel buggy?

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    2. Re:Well... by caseih · · Score: 1

      Isn't this normal behavior on Macs? Macs use a CR as the line delimiter, not LF, or CR/LF. Why is this a problem?

    3. Re:Well... by Snover · · Score: 2, Informative

      Macs haven't used CR as the line delimiter since OS 9. OS X uses LF, like every other BSD and *nix.

      --

      [insert witty comment here]
    4. Re:Well... by DurendalMac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In addition to that, less beachballing, please. Firefox hangs more often than Safari, which is one of the reasons that I don't use it very often.

    5. Re:Well... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 0

      For me the raging core leak(s) are the worst. Mine's at 1619764k vsize and 475432 in core. There's no excuse for this.

  3. Thanks Mozilla Team! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The first thing my s.o. demanded to be installed on her shiney new macbook. She didn't like safari alot (missed adblock+ & weather extensions).

    Rather ask how to make FF on mac suck less, I'd just like to thank the Firefox dev team for an excellent port, and ask people for suggestions of how FF on os x can rock even more.

  4. Bug report? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firefox on the Mac generally meets my needs. I had not really noticed it being much different from Firefox on other platforms. However, there is one thing I noticed. When all open windows are minimized to the Dock, a new window cannot be opened. This happens on a PowerPC-based Mac (10.4.9) with Firefox 2.0.0.3. That is a Mac-specific thing that would be nice to have fixed.

    1. Re:Bug report? by Goaway · · Score: 1

      I had not really noticed it being much different from Firefox on other platforms.

      That is the problem. Mac apps are not supposed to be identical to apps on other platforms. Mac apps have their own interface guidelines, and Firefox breaks them left and right and stands out like a sore thumb.

  5. Bring back... by eggman9713 · · Score: 0, Interesting

    ...third-party cookie blocking please! This option was removed in FireFox 2.0 for whatever reason, and although this is not unique to the mac version, it would be nice to have it back, as it majorly prevents advertising cookies and gives me just that much more peace of mind when I surf the net.

    1. Re:Bring back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was removed because it didn't work. It has never worked before and doesn't work in other browser either (although they might advertise it), it is just too easy to circumvent.
       
      Instead of giving people a false sense of security by offering a security function that doesn't work, they just simply removed it. And so should other browsers.

  6. Nice idea... by Rufty · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Any chance of something like this for Thunderbird?

    --
    Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    1. Re:Nice idea... by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Any chance of something like this for Thunderbird?

      Well said. I've sat here for a few minutes, and I can't think of much for Firefox, but the Thunderbird list might as well be a mile long. Thunderbird needs Mail.app import and Spotlight integration for starters.

    2. Re:Nice idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Correo?

      http://www.nkreeger.com/correo/

      That's Gecko + some Thunderbird code - the XUL shit + Mac interface

    3. Re:Nice idea... by HAKdragon · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd like to see Address book integration as well. (I know there are hacks to achieve it, but I'd rather get something more official.)

      --
      "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs. We have a protractor."
    4. Re:Nice idea... by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I'd love a profile import/export functionality myself... something that takes your current mail profile, exports it to a platform agnostic format, then zip it into a single archive for portability... having this work to/from linux/windows/mac would be great... I've had far more success migrating my profile from windows/linux than either to/from mac... I've had to move a half dozen clients to mac in the past year or so... what a pita.. generally oe/outlook to tbird.. then remove the index files.. copy profile to mac, and update the prefs js file... almost the same for windows/linux, but sometimes on mac it just doesn't work quite right, and I wind up doing hokey things, like moving messages via imap...

      I know this is technically off topic, but I think the same should be done for firefox as well... a simple export/import profile method for all mozilla apps that works between platforms would improve the nightmare a lot of us deal with.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  7. Looks like he's already got by wiredog · · Score: 3, Interesting
    all the suggestions I would make. Primarily, fix the borken bookmarks. It'd be nice to be able to order them by hand rather than having the app decide for me which order they should be in.

    Other than that, I prefer FireFox to the built-in Mac browser.

    1. Re:Looks like he's already got by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bookmarks are not Mac-specific.
       
      Both bookmarks and history are getting a major overhaul for Firefox 3 though. It is called 'Places' and actually, the work on it is mostly done by now. I think you can expect a Firefox 3 alpha build with the new 'places' system in about six weeks.

    2. Re:Looks like he's already got by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Primarily, fix the borken bookmarks. It'd be nice to be able to order them by hand rather than having the app decide for me which order they should be in.

      Huh? Bookmarks--> Organize Bookmarks... now move them around by hand all you want.

    3. Re:Looks like he's already got by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      I can order my bookmarks by hand in FF. It might be a function of the All-in-One Sidebar extension that I use (without that extension, I would still be using Opera).

      I'm using FF 2.0.0.3 with All-in-One Sidebar v0.7.1.

      If bookmark ordering is your primary grievance, give this extension a shot and see if it fixes it for you.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
  8. IE tab? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    [ducks and runs away to dodge rotten tomatoes nay rotten apples being thrown]

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:IE tab? by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      Well, as long as you don't mind the version of IE in question being ridicoulsy outdated, discontinued, and not able to run native on the new Macs, then go ahead.

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    2. Re:IE tab? by chrish · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're not as trolly as you might have thought.

      An IE Tab style add-on that would load the page with WebKit instead of the Firefox renderer would actually be helpful sometimes; I've hit a few websites in the last month that wouldn't work with Firefox 2.* on OS X but would work with Safari.

      Yes, the solution is to bitch at the idiots who made the site check for specific browser/OS combos instead of just writing up standard XHTML and CSS, but in the mean time, I need to get things done...

      --
      - chrish
    3. Re:IE tab? by MetalPhalanx · · Score: 1

      IE tab requires the IE rendering engine to be installed on the computer before it will work.

    4. Re:IE tab? by seandiggity · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a page that wouldn't render with Firefox but would with Safari or Konqueror. Can you post an example? I assume there are a few sites that would render slightly better, since Firefox doesn't yet pass the acid2 test. I'm just surprised anyone would design a site specifically for Safari, even if the site is Mac-oriented.

      --
      Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
    5. Re:IE tab? by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      Looks like it's fixed now, but Marriott's web site used to not really work in Firefox, but was fine in Safari.

      --
      End of Line.
  9. FF&OO by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

    The standard FF like the standard OO both look like something running on a Windows 3.1 machine. Whats the point of a nice sleek MacBook if your main app is so clunky and out of place. They should branch the FF code like NeoOffice have done and stick a decent OSX UI round it.

    --
    I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    1. Re:FF&OO by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Well, honestly they should put a prettier UI on FF for Windows, too. That would get them a lot farther -- if they can do it without slowing its load time down even more.

    2. Re:FF&OO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Since NeoOffice feels like running Vista on a Windows 3.1-old machine, that would be so much better!

    3. Re:FF&OO by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      As someone else already pointed out - Camino.
      It's hard to make an app have a native look on multiple different OS's, since they all use different gui toolkits. Therefore, most cross platform apps write a base abstraction layer using the native gui toolkit and have their own toolkit running atop that. It also results in the app looking and behaving the same on all platforms (except that firefox has different default themes for mac)

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    4. Re:FF&OO by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      But why can't Camino use FF plug-ins? Without the plug-ins its just another browser. They should at least share that much of a code base.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
    5. Re:FF&OO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats the point of a nice sleek MacBook if your main app is so clunky and out of place. Hmm ... let me think.
      ...
      I got it! There is no point, really!
      And while we're at it: have a few question marks:
      ?????
      There, that should be enough to profit from for a few days!
      I'm afraid I can't pass you any of my apostrophes; they're too valuable. I need them when writing comments.
    6. Re:FF&OO by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Tons of people consider OpenOffice.org to be "Mac compatible," which is like saying a Windows app is "Mac compatible" because you can run it in emulation. X11 is about as far from a mac-like experience as you can get. It's absolutely hideous to look at, and there's no standardization about how interfaces should work.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    7. Re:FF&OO by vague+disclaimer · · Score: 1

      You've not heard of NeoOffice, have you?

    8. Re:FF&OO by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      Because Camino uses cocoa for display and UI, not XUL. That's the defining difference between FF and Camino. FF extensions and themes are all written for or in XUL.

      Incidentally, that's why Camino is fast, stable, and looks good.

    9. Re:FF&OO by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Here's a hint: Use Mozilla's official OS X build and don't build your own X11-based version. Seriously, Firefox already uses Carbon, which means native widgets. Or maybe you mean the widgets shown in websites? Most websites don't conform to the Mac GUI at all anyway, so I don't really see those widgets particularly out of place - at least not more than the rest of the GUI.

      Of course, if you find non-native GUI elements so insufferable you could always install Firefox 3 and be happy.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    10. Re:FF&OO by fangorious · · Score: 1

      Camino doesn't use/support Xul.

    11. Re:FF&OO by JonJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Holy cown Batman! X11 is like emulation? Seriously, are all Mac users this stupid? There's no standard on the Mac either. Garageband, iTunes, iMovie, whatever. They look slightly different, and behaves slightly different. Not to mention Final Cut, Aperture, and the mess of other applications.

      --
      -- Linux user #369862
    12. Re:FF&OO by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've heard of NeoOffice and have used it for quite some time. However, it's a separate project from OO.o, and fewer development resources.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    13. Re:FF&OO by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the ad hominem attacks, X11 is a lot like emulation. You need to start up a separate app, and you need to fiddle with it to get printers working and use native fonts, and I've yet to see a good looking interface in X11.

      All those apps might be different, but they run without starting some other piece of software, they integrate well across the rest of your operating system, and they're not hideous.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    14. Re:FF&OO by Tickletaint · · Score: 1

      No, Firefox's UI widgets (the ones in the browser chrome, like the Preferences window—er, sheet—why the fuck isn't it a window, like in any well-designed Mac application?) are not actually native widgets. They are terrible, ghastly simulacra of native widgets that manage to replicate much of the look, but exhibit disturbingly PC-like behavior. If you think Firefox's widgets are passably Mac-like, you're either not a genuine Mac user or you haven't ever launched Firefox on a Mac.

      --
      Make Slashdot readable! See journal.
    15. Re:FF&OO by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Okay, the browser chrome is nonstandard (but I actually prefer the look) and the prefs window has some nonstandard stuff, but it's not that much. However, I still use Firefox 1.5; maybe Firefox 2 is much different in that regard.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  10. printing blows as well.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I swear that it is mysteriously locked into US Letter paper size and not using A4.....

  11. Its kinda funny. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I usually use Safari but I don't know why. I have firefox in my dock right next to it. I also tend to get slightly better compatibility with Fire Fox. But... I still use Safari. I think the main reason is probably the bookmarks work better in safari. But I don't really use bookmarks that much. I guess the only feature that I really prefer over Safari that I use over Firefox is RSS I just like Safari RSS Support better then Firefox. If I bookmark an RSS Feed it automatically subscribes me. And there is a search bar right there for me to find info in it. It is not that firefox is bad and there isn't a work around it is not that hard to do a cmd-F (though having the search on the bottom of the window is annoying) It is usually easy to make an app that looks and works good for both Linux and Windows. But for Mac there is a slightly different set of standards. Firefox isn't horrible but if still feels out of place.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Its kinda funny. by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      Camino supports / searches. When you have a page open, hit forward slash and type your search term. command+G will "find next".

    2. Re:Its kinda funny. by doctorzizmore · · Score: 1

      I use FF pretty much all the time. I would like to use Safari because it is much faster but it really comes down to Bookmarks. I use a couple different computers (crossplatform) and Foxmarks synchronizer is just too useful for me to do without. I'm pretty happy too because i finally got FF to look almost identical to Safari (as was said earlier FF is a pretty hideous app under default conditions). Get the GrApple(Uno) theme from Arronax and install Uno to get rid of that ugly line running through the top of the window. Uno is also really nice for changing the appearance of a lot of programs (personally not a big fan of brushed metal).

      --
      People in bamboo houses shouldn't throw pandas...Jesus said that! -Ninja
    3. Re:Its kinda funny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried IceWeasel?

  12. SafariBlock by __aajqwr7439 · · Score: 1

    I think the Web Developer Extension is one of the few things that keep me coming back to FireFox. It also doesn't crash like Safari does when closing windows after watching Poker After Dark episodes.

    Regarding AdBlock, tho: SafariBlock is pretty close.

    DN

  13. Cocoa Gestures by mike2R · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just to add that the one thing that lets me function in Camino (or Safari) at all, is Cocoa Gestures, although if anyone can tell how to tie this into "top of page" and "bottom of page" actions I'd be a happy man.

    --
    This sig all sigs devours
    1. Re:Cocoa Gestures by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, if the browser/application doesn't have stuff like"go/top of the page" etc menus, you won't be able to assign gestures to them. While using gestures, you actually use the "menus" in just different way.

      And some bad news about the Cocoa Gestures:

      Well officially Cocoa Gestures, the freeware version won't be maintained anymore but the "real thing", cocoa suite with cheaper price tag available. Just saying if you haven't heard already since by nature, that program needs updates.

      http://www.cocoasuite.com/

      I use it for like 2 years or so now...

  14. Huh? by wandazulu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I use FF exclusively on both the Mac and Windows, and I think the Mac version works *better* than on Windows...the Mac version doesn't get sluggish after opening and closing a lot of tabs, doesn't gobble up half a gig of ram, and I have never had it just up and quit on me like it does on Windows.

    I find FF on the Mac is also more tolerant of some of the more ... baroque addons; I admit to being an addon junkie and addons that claim to be fully cross-platform crash on Windows while I've never had an addon crash FF on the Mac.

    So, hey, if they want to make FF better, that's awesome, but to me, it's enhancement, not fixing.

    1. Re:Huh? by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Me too! There is nothing sucky about Firefox. If anything, I wish that Apple would drop Safari and just use Firefox, and use their energies elsewhere.

    2. Re:Huh? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see Firefox crash on my Mac a lot. Sometimes it just stalls and won't do any thing for a minute. For a long time, toggling FlashBlock on a site would crash the Mac. Firefox on the Mac doesn't allow me to rearrange bookmarks in folders on the bookmarks bar like the Windows version. I have to go to "manage bookmarks", which is a clumsy little program.

      I like using Firefox and Thunderbird simply because I can just transfer my profile to another platform and back. I just did that last week when I moved my Thunderbird emails to my Windows notebook for an expo, and then back to my Mac tower when I returned. It's sometimes a bit tedious, but it only takes me five to ten minutes to do that each way

    3. Re:Huh? by mike2R · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My dislike of FF on the Mac (I use it exclusively on Windows - I spend my time about 50/50 Mac/Windows) comes down more to look and feel than functionality.

      It feels odd not to have normal Mac widgets - I'm not usually fussed by things like that, but for some reason it bothers me in FF.

      The more important thing is that it just feels clunky - I'm using an old eMac G4 700 which may not be helping - but, compared to Safari or Camino, Firefox feels slow. Little things, like I can't select a bookmark from while a page is loading, and the application just feels generally less responsive than either Camino or Safari.

      --
      This sig all sigs devours
    4. Re:Huh? by frelax · · Score: 1

      Firefox takes much more time to start, and it slows down a lot with flash sites.

    5. Re:Huh? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      I use FF exclusively on both the Mac and Windows, and I think the Mac version works *better* than on Windows...the Mac version doesn't get sluggish after opening and closing a lot of tabs, doesn't gobble up half a gig of ram, and I have never had it just up and quit on me like it does on Windows.

      Interesting. It does on mine (G4 PB 1.25 GHz). Lots of RAM gobbling, lots of spinning beachball, lots of intermittent crashing. Of course, Safari does the same for me, so I use the one that has screwed me less recently.

    6. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the parent is not representative of the typical Mac FF user experience. I agree with the other replies that Firefox on Mac does use a lot of memory and is not so stable. Also, it seems odd to me to link cross-platform addons with crashes in Windows.

    7. Re:Huh? by YU5333021 · · Score: 1

      It pains me to say, but on a PCC mac, FF is a bloated piece of shit. It feels like playing Mario 3, running in a nintendo emulator that's run through dosbox running on XP installed in Virtual PC, run through rosetta, on x86 version of os X, that got successfully installed on a Dell from 1998.

      I tried Safari, FF, Camino and Shiira for my old G4 mac (1.5GHz, 1.75 GB ram). All I want is a reasonably fast rendering engine, and ability to block images as I choose. There are no winners in this sorry bunch. I end up using safari as it renders the fastest, but generally I try not to use this machine for web use. The machine still performs admirably as part of a recording studio setup. Photoshop runs at the same speed as it does through rosetta on a core 2 duo mac. Yet surfing it will not do.

      It makes sense for Apple Entertainment to start treating PPC macs like diseased old dogs at some point. It's a shame that open source community is doing the same.

    8. Re:Huh? by shane2uunet · · Score: 1

      I love FF on Mac, can't live without the Firebug and Web Developer extensions. But just yesterday I closed FF as it was using 460MB of RAM. Not quite a half a gig, but darn near close.

      Really, what I'd love to see is a way to port FF extensions to Camino.

      --
      This space available for rent.
    9. Re:Huh? by 3choTh1s · · Score: 1

      It pains me to say, but on a PCC mac, FF is a bloated piece of shit. It feels like playing Mario 3, running in a nintendo emulator that's run through dosbox running on XP installed in Virtual PC, run through rosetta, on x86 version of os X, that got successfully installed on a Dell from 1998.
      Man this just screams of prior experience. I hope it was just an experiment. =P
    10. Re:Huh? by YU5333021 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I posted this through Pine program that's run through dosbox running on XP installed in Virtual PC, run through rosetta, on x86 version of os X, that somehow got successfully installed on a Dell built in 1998, you insensitive clod. Still more reliable than FF.

  15. one-button mouse world by bananaendian · · Score: 1

    In Firefox when i for example press and hold over a link or image, it doesn't bring up the menu you get by right-clicking on Windows? On Windows I do a lot of right-clicking and don't have to touch the keyboard at all - with mac I have to either use keyboard to 'right-click' or find the function among a maze of menus. And buying a two button mouse isn't the solution you insensitive clod! since I'm using the trackpad on the macbook.

    --
    www.tribalnetworks.org - helping tribal people around the world to own their own means of high-tech communications
    1. Re:one-button mouse world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you're using the trackpad on the macbook try putting two fingers on the trackpad as you click the button.

    2. Re:one-button mouse world by cypherz · · Score: 1

      So why not just use the built-in right-click functionality of your MacBook trackpad? It's under Trackpad Gestures on the Trackpad tab of the mouse prefs pane.

      HTH

      --
      This sig kills fascists.
    3. Re:one-button mouse world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Place two fingers on the trackpad, and click with your thumb. This will give you the desired "right click". If it doesn't work, check your preferences.

    4. Re:one-button mouse world by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that ctrl button is WAY THE HELL over there.

      Of course, if you have a Macbook, you could try clicking with two fingers for a right click. So, unless I'm an insensitive clod and you only have one finger... of course, then a two button mouse wouldn't work anyway.

    5. Re:one-button mouse world by wnknisely · · Score: 2, Informative

      Goto "about:config"

      Set ui.click_hold_context_menus to "true"

      Enjoy!

      --
      In illa quae ultra sunt
    6. Re:one-button mouse world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So double-tap right click on your macbook. You ignorant clod.

    7. Re:one-button mouse world by yabos · · Score: 1

      That would work for the Macbook but older Macs aren't able to do this without 3rd party software.

    8. Re:one-button mouse world by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      So, unless I'm an insensitive clod and you only have one finger... of course, then a two button mouse wouldn't work anyway.
      That's what your nose is for. ;)
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    9. Re:one-button mouse world by matth · · Score: 1

      I haven't set this.. and I am still able to do a click and hold left mouse button.

    10. Re:one-button mouse world by cypherz · · Score: 1

      Of course, but the OP said he has a macbook.

      --
      This sig kills fascists.
    11. Re:one-button mouse world by yabos · · Score: 1

      But in the interest for fixing Firefox, just working on newer Macs isn't the best solution.

    12. Re:one-button mouse world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a Mac I found I can set the track pad to one finger tap= left click, two finger tap =right click, I never use the button save for drag and drop now, however my work laptop annoys me due to no 2 finger right click available in its options!

    13. Re:one-button mouse world by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      There's another part of your body much closer to your hand that might work as well. At least it's longer than your nose (hopefully ;-). But it might only work when browsing certain sites...

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
  16. Flash and adblock by Pseud0 · · Score: 1

    I wish the flash integration on mac wouldn't let firefox/flash consume 100% CPU, making my MacBook want to hoover. I also wish that Adblock wouldn't make my overlays flicker in and out of screen. As for Firefox itself - it doesn't suck. It's still the very best. Even on Mac. So quit whining and get in the game!

    --

    /John Sjolander, project manager Contribio
    1. Re:Flash and adblock by jhfry · · Score: 1

      Ditto!

      The little lady gets upset when I close her browser before logging myself into our Mac... of course if I don't, her damn myspace page (that is always up) consumes 70%-100% cpu AT ALL TIMES.

      I don't notice any significant slow downs normally associated with a task using excessive CPU... so I suspect that the consumption is low priority (or Mac gives the interactive user/application priority)

      Either way, it usually breaks sleeping too. I can force it to sleep, but it never goes to sleep on it's own if she leaves that damn myspace page open.

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    2. Re:Flash and adblock by Miseph · · Score: 1

      My friend, the solution is to reclaim the computer and set some rules prohibiting stupidity. If you're really ballsy you could just go for the throat and declare no MySpace, though that runs the risk of being willfully ignored and undermining the whole effort. I'd just go for explaining to her why it's completely idiotic to leave that up, especially since it clearly wastes a lot of energy and slows the machine down significantly.

      I speak from personal experience, by the way: mine used to have a thing for leaving Photoshop open with 20+ extremely hi-rez photos loaded for hours at a time; then she'd get mad at me when I closed it because my machine only had 256 megs of RAM and just touching the mouse caused it to lag out. It can be done, though.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    3. Re:Flash and adblock by jeremyp · · Score: 2, Funny

      making my MacBook want to hoover.
      Yes, that really sucks.
      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    4. Re:Flash and adblock by jhfry · · Score: 1

      Not to be crass... but you don't get laid much do you?

      Telling a woman that she can't have her myspace, is like telling her she cannot talk on the phone, get her nails done, wear makeup, or gossip with her friends.

      Some women like to be dominated, some just don't know better... but any woman worth having would kick your ass to the couch so quick you wouldn't know what hit you if you tried to tell them they couldn't have their myspace.

      I have slowly worked on the issue... and I do occasionally just shut her damn browser down before I log in... but everything must be done very carefully. If I tell her I am setting "some rules prohibiting stupidity" I suspect I can expect not to get laid for a week!

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    5. Re:Flash and adblock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May I suggest the latest version of adblock plus and firefox?

      AdBlock is much slower than adblock plus, which may lead to your "flickering". Or the computer could just be slow in which case there is no help other than hardware upgrade.

      http://adblockplus.org/

    6. Re:Flash and adblock by paperdiesel · · Score: 1

      "any woman who would kick your ass to the couch if you tried to tell them they couldn't have their myspace... is nuts and isn't worth having.
      There, fixed that for you.

      I do occasionally just shut her damn browser down before I log in... but everything must be done very carefully"
      You sometimes close her browser?! Easy there big fella. That's pretty ballsy.

      "Not to be crass... but you don't get laid much do you?"
      I'm betting you don't, either. Does she occasioanlly let you take your balls out of the jar on the mantle so that you can remember what it was like?
    7. Re:Flash and adblock by jhfry · · Score: 1

      LOL...

      My post was a bit of an exaggeration. But I do find it good policy to NOT tell a woman what to do. There are ways to manipulate them, but outright orders rarely work if your woman has a spine.

      And yes, I keep my woman happy... so I get mine.

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
  17. Out of curiosity by Timesprout · · Score: 1

    Can anyone comment on how Opera behaves on the Mac?

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Out of curiosity by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      Pretty well actually. Now, I'm not a regular Opera user, so take that for what its worth. I just use it for web development testing. The widgets are native, though one of the annoying things about web dev on a Mac is how differently the native widgets deal with new CSS directives in Camino, Safari and Opera. Safari ignores just about everything (except height and width on textareas and width on text), the sizing always seems wrong in Camino and Opera buttons inherit * { padding: 0; margin: 0 }

      The speed is good and the rendering is clean though. I'm running 9.2 on this machine here.

    2. Re:Out of curiosity by KodeSlut · · Score: 0

      i use opera and firefox both at work, windows xp and home os x. i find that opera is better on mac os x than on windows. in my opinion opera in general is better than firefox on both winows and mac. there a still occationally some pages that don't work in opera but it just keeps getting better and better.

      --
      - i'll get me coat! -
    3. Re:Out of curiosity by loourker · · Score: 1

      Quite well thank you very much. Actually, Opera works exactly as it does in Win or Linux (I use it on all 3). the side bar should be a standard cocoa object to match the rest of the Mac apps and when you close a window using the red "ball" it doesn't save tabs which is irritating. However it does save them when you hit CMD-Q. It runs fast although it takes a while to start up (that's probably because i have about 15 tabs open though).

    4. Re:Out of curiosity by SpeedyDX · · Score: 1

      Actually, I use Opera exclusively on my Macbook (other than when I log into the university network, which for some reason stopped supporting Opera but that's another issue altogether). I'm not a huge browser geek, so I don't know the mechanics of what's going on, but Opera just seems to work with OS X. I feel like it's integrated into the OS better than Camino or Firefox. I feel that it's easier to use and more versatile than Safari. Tabbing through forms is separate from tabbing through links (which is so ingenious, I don't know why other browsers don't do it). It's a lot easier to set keyboard shortcuts. Clicking the address bar automatically highlights the address so you can start typing right away, instead of having to do a cmd-a before typing.

      Opera on OS X just simply embraces the whole ease-of-use philosophy of OS X. Everything just works, and works well.

  18. The old right click stuff by zackster · · Score: 2, Informative

    one thing I hate with FF OSX is the fact you can't right click on a bookmark in a folder on the personal tool bar and open it in a new tab it was marked in bugzilla as won't fix, and there's at least 6 duplicates, the bug is 300710 it used to work, "It was removed because right click in mac menus fires the menu item command"

    1. Re:The old right click stuff by barrymccaul · · Score: 1

      couldn't agree more. this is by far my biggest pet peeve since i started using a mac as my main machine.

      if you can right click on a link and choose a tab from the context menu, or command-key and click to open straight in a new tab, surely ONE of those options could allowed to work in bookmarks.

    2. Re:The old right click stuff by Delkster · · Score: 1

      How about middle-clicking on the link? I don't know about Macs or how Firefox works on them but that works at least in the Linux version.

    3. Re:The old right click stuff by mattgoldey · · Score: 0

      I have a Mighty Mouse attached to my Mac mini. Middle-click behaves the same way -- it opens the links in a new tab.

    4. Re:The old right click stuff by klez23 · · Score: 1

      You can just use the middle (scroll-wheel) mouse button, or hold command & click with left (or only) mouse button, to open a bookmark in a new tab in firefox/osx.

  19. My Firefox pet peeve - bookmark shortcuts by zzyzx · · Score: 1

    I don't know if this is cross platform or not, but when I pull down my bookmarks from the menu, typing the first letter of the bookmark doesn't cycle me through the bookmarks starting with that letter. Rather it takes me to either a subset of that group or, in the case of U on my mac, to the first bookmark starting with W. I really wish that would work better.

    1. Re:My Firefox pet peeve - bookmark shortcuts by jesser · · Score: 1

      in the case of U on my mac, to the first bookmark starting with W

      That is... impressive. Do you know whether there's a bug filed?

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
  20. I only have one request by ptomblin · · Score: 1

    Fix all the damn memory leaks. I have to restart Firefox about once a week because it chews up a gigabyte of RAM. I have to say, that's way better than back in the Firefox 1.1 days when I had to restart it several times a day, but still.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    1. Re:I only have one request by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1

      I still haven't figured out why people don't just quit the browser when they leave the computer for a bit. It doesn't take that long to start up.

      --
      End of Line.
  21. Re:Here's a few by ben+there... · · Score: 1, Informative

    Have maximize remove useless title bar.

    Not really useless. It tells you what page you're on/article you're reading if the web dev is competent (ie not myspace devs).

    F11 should do what you're looking for.
  22. Search at the bottom by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1

    In response,

    I'd like to comment that the Search box being at the bottom of the window is one of the reasons I first switched to Firefox (back in the days when Netscape was dead and Opera was the only real alternative). I've lost track of the number of times I've used MS applications (or anything else really) and have been annoyed by the search box covering up text. Just my 2p.

    Perhaps your comment could be more correctly summed up as:
    "SUGGESTION: Allow the Search bar to float and not be locked at the bottom of the window."

    --
    You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
    1. Re:Search at the bottom by Damek · · Score: 1

      Perhaps your comment could be more correctly summed up as:
      "SUGGESTION: Allow the Search bar to float and not be locked at the bottom of the window."


      No. If I may be so bold as to speak for the other poster, that's not what he meant.

      He was referring to the RSS feature of Safari which includes a search field on the side that most definitely does not cover up text. And it's specific to the RSS feeds.

      Generally, the text search function in Safari sucks and Apple would be better to imitate Firefox in this matter. But the special RSS feed display & search is much better than Firefox's RSS functions.

      My favorite part is where, if you create a bookmark folder containing a bunch of RSS feeds, you can choose to "view all feeds in this folder" and it aggregates all the feeds together. It's a great way to scan posts on similar subject matter, for example, in one fell swoop.

      Plus, in the sidebar with the search field, are links to show posts only one feed or another, and a slider that lets you show more or less of each post using OS X's built in "summary" feature. It works reasonably well.
    2. Re:Search at the bottom by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the clarification. We have a mac in the house, but I'm mostly on Windows / Linux.
      I currently use Sage with Firefox and haven't yet got into complexities with RSS feeds - one bugbear is that some feeds use feed:// which doesn't always translate (changing this to http:// fixes it).

      I'll look into this when I'm next allowed to use the mac :)

      --
      You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
  23. Camino lacks foxmarks! by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

    I don't have foxmarks from within camino. Foxmarks are awesome - I can have the same set of bookmarks on my Mac at home, in my RHEL box at work and my windows work laptop!

    And Camino doesn't support that. It's a deal-breaker for me.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

    1. Re:Camino lacks foxmarks! by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably why I said:

      For folks who don't need specific Firefox functionality or Firefox extensions, Camino is already the answer.

      I understand that for many, the lack of Firefox extensions is a killer. But, for other groups of people, it's not.

    2. Re:Camino lacks foxmarks! by GundamFan · · Score: 1

      Google's browser sync does the same thing with the added ability to sync browser history and cookies using encryption and your Google account.

      --
      I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
      Mark Twain
    3. Re:Camino lacks foxmarks! by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      I have my bookmarks available in every browser, and can sort them in multiple ways, and search them.

      I use Firefox when using Linux or Windows, and I mainly use Safari on my iBook because it feels faster. I do have Firefox installed though, purely for the Firebug extension.

    4. Re:Camino lacks foxmarks! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 3, Informative

      Speaking of integration with OS X...

      Being able to sync with bookmarks stored on DotMac would be a nice feature that Firefox currently lacks but Safari has. That, and the Safari using the OS-standard spelling dictionary are the reason I prefer it right now.

    5. Re:Camino lacks foxmarks! by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      I have the same set of URLs available to me wherever I can get at the IMAP folder that holds them. If it's not my computer (and if it's still running Windows), I can fire up Portable Thunderbird to access them (and then bring them up in Portable Firefox, of course).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    6. Re:Camino lacks foxmarks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand that for many, the lack of Firefox extensions is a killer. But, for other groups of people, it's not.

      Yeah, for people who don't understand it is possible to safely browse (NoScript) and avoid annoying ads (NoScript, Adblock, Controle de Scripts, Flashblock). And people who don't understand that the browser can be what they want (Download Manager Tweak, Copy Plain Text, New Tab Homepage, Reuse Home Page (these last 2 because the programmers of Firefox have no clue), Stop Autoply, Stylish, et cetera).

      Camino (Safari, Opera, etc.) is OK as far as it goes, but once you browse with gif animation off and NoScript, Adblock, Controle de Scripts, and Flashblock locked & loaded you'll never be able to tolerate any other browser. Unless you LIKE pain, you sicko.

      Camino has little reason to exist as is. It is just an alternate Safari. I hear you now, "But, but, it isn't brushed metal, it is SOOO different, man.", but I ignore you.

    7. Re:Camino lacks foxmarks! by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      On the other hand majority of OS X users use and prefer (unlike win ie) Safari which doesn't have anything comparable to Firefox on extension level.

      Perhaps Apple doesn't care to make Safari extensible such as Firefox because they want a simple but advanced under the hood application?

      Also lack of extensions and simple, cocoa look could be another reason why OS X people use/prefer Camino.

    8. Re:Camino lacks foxmarks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Camino has Adblock and Flashblock.

      It also has a much better interface than Firefox. Why would you want to use a half-assed port anyway?

  24. Small correction by ramoth4 · · Score: 0, Troll

    My last name is spelled "Barrett". People spell it wrong all the time, it's not a big deal.

    Thanks for the help getting the word out, Slashdot. I've got hundreds of emails and blog comments, and the more data I have, the better. I really do think I'll be able to gather a lot of useful and interesting data from all these suggestions.

    Thanks again!

  25. Sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Dear, Colin Barret
    Buy a Mac and use Firefox yourself instead of writing an article about a question for a solution where you don't know the problem for.

    Next problem. But this time a real problem please... like "Help Make Slashdot editors suck less in their journalism"

    1. Re:Sheesh... by KodeSlut · · Score: 0

      yes,
      But every one uses software differently.
      These differences translate into a diffenrent expirence from each person. So just because he could run FireFox hims self, is no guarantee to finding all the issues.

      It seems perfectly reasonable it wnat input from other people.

      So it seems.

      *Sheesh*

      --
      - i'll get me coat! -
    2. Re:Sheesh... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Dear Colin Barret,
      Plaese try fixing your own software first. Adium is even more of a resource pig than Firefox.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    3. Re:Sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're full of shit. Both are idling.

          PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #PRTS #MREGS RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VSIZE
      13880 Adium 0.0% 0:08.79 2 106 326 8.24M 20.6M 14.1M 230M
      13744 firefox-bi 14.0% 1:21.36 16 222 531 65.8M 33.6M 69.1M 287M

  26. Re:Here's a few by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you want to cycle windows in an app, use Command+~. I'd really appreciate it if Windows behaved this way. Not every window is the same.

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  27. Suck less == stop crashing. Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's that simple. Remove "Talkback" because it's unnecessary. That's the goal.

  28. Not if you don't want it. by fatalb7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the Keyboard & Mouse system pref there is an option called:
    "Tap trackpad with two fingers for secondary click".
    At least on my MB Pro.

    Moving two fingers = scroll.
    Taping two fingers = right click

    I rarely use the trackpad button in fact.

  29. For me, by ambrosen · · Score: 1

    the most useful thing would be to have an AppleScriptable DOM, like Safari. But that's only because I've got a Firefox only site that I use that I'd like to copy data into programmatically.

    1. Re:For me, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words support the "do javascript" applescript command like Safari and OmniWeb do. You can do a lot of things with this, it's very useful for application integration.

  30. to be fair to mozilla... by owlnation · · Score: 4, Informative

    They have significantly improved Firefox on the Mac as time goes on.

    I found I had to be very dedicated to use Firefox 1.5 - that release just plain sucked, especially with regard to stability, favicon use, bookmarks, and I found the search bar crashed the app more often than not.

    However, since v2.0 things have got better, it seems to be overall more stable and they have addressed the favicon issue up to a point. Bookmark control still leaves a lot to be desired. (Though that has room for improvement in the Windows version too - and I know that's being addressed for v3.0).

    I seem to remember reading that for v2.0 they had a deliberate policy of a "Firefox look" across platforms, thus moved away from an OS X looking application. I'm not sure if that is the right decision. Firefox does look odd on a Mac. (And for the inevitable reply that says "but you can use a theme to make it look like OS X" - I'd rather not even try, themes can be very unstable and hog resources.)

    It's a tough market - Safari is a great browser, the only real reason to use Firefox is the extensions (which is a great reason, and the one that keeps me loyal to the Fox. You'll only prise Flashblock and Adblock from my cold dead mouse hand)

    1. Re:to be fair to mozilla... by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

      yeah, adblock adds 20 minutes of battery life by removing flash and other things. :)

    2. Re:to be fair to mozilla... by PsychoSid · · Score: 1

      I find PithHelmet to block ad's and flash more than reasonable

    3. Re:to be fair to mozilla... by jesser · · Score: 1

      Use adblock, save the planet?

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    4. Re:to be fair to mozilla... by MissAnsley · · Score: 1

      Don't forget in line find!! It is one of FF biggest assets, IMHO.

      --
      Rose is a rose is a rose is a rose.
    5. Re:to be fair to mozilla... by Duke+Machesne · · Score: 1

      Oy vey! Browser extensions you have to pay for!

    6. Re:to be fair to mozilla... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget in line find!! It is one of FF biggest assets, IMHO.
      Seconded! I pity the browser that does not implement this.
  31. Full Screen by neoform · · Score: 1

    Allow the browser to actually take over the whole screen instead of just removing the buttons at the top.

    --
    MABASPLOOM!
    1. Re:Full Screen by newspeak · · Score: 1

      Go here.

      https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/465 0

        or

      http://disruptive-innovations.com/products/index.h tml

      Scroll Down.

      Install on thine Mac...Does it work?

      The review says it has been tested on Win & Linux.
      Lemme know if this works on a Mac.

      --
      Google is not Microsoft, Apple is not Orange, Ibm is Lenovo.
    2. Re:Full Screen by neoform · · Score: 1

      Well, we're talking about non addons, improvements here..

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
  32. Oxymoron of the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Colin Barret, one of the new Mac geniuses
    Today's oxymoron of the day is "Mac genius."
    1. Re:Oxymoron of the day by achbed · · Score: 1

      And "Windows Guru" was yesterday's.

    2. Re:Oxymoron of the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And "Windows Guru" was yesterday's.
      But "Mac genius" still tops the hilarity meter.

      I mean, you pay out the nose for your hardware and software; the physical package looks pretty-- nice and white and stylish. And yet the best you can do is a placeholder? That doesn't sound very "genius" to me.

      Though you misunderstand; this isn't about Windows versus Mac; this is about the concept of a "Mac genius" even existing.
    3. Re:Oxymoron of the day by achbed · · Score: 1

      too bad i dont have your address - oh, wait, maybe i do

      *digs through the logs*

      well, anyway, if you have any good ideas for a main page, let me know :) - dw -

  33. respect icc profiles by yulek · · Score: 1

    given the mac's strength in graphic applications, how about making firefox respect and support icc profiles?

    --
    in this age of communication i'm just not getting through
    1. Re:respect icc profiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That is already being worked on and will probably make it into Firefox 3.

        https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16769

  34. iLife Photo integration by ironring2006 · · Score: 1

    This isn't really a big one in the grand scheme of things, but what I like about Safari over FF is that I can just drag and drop images from a webpage and put them into iPhoto. In FF I have to manually save the image first and then import it into iPhoto. I think before you also couldn't do it for iTunes album art, but that has since been added. I still use FF myself, but that is one thing I wish it had that Safari does.

    1. Re:iLife Photo integration by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      That sounds more like an iPhoto problem than a Firefox one. I don't use iPhoto, but with iTunes I can drag 'n' drop album artwork from a webpage in Firefox to iTunes and it Just Works(tm).

  35. Evil? by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 1

    Are they still not evil? And will they continue to be non-evil for all future?

    *waves at Sergey & Larry*

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  36. Bookmarks by 22_9_3_11_25 · · Score: 1

    I use FireFox with linux and wish they would improve the manage bookmarks part of the browser. I don't find it to be very intuitive and managed to wipe out an entire section of bookmarks. If you click a folder full of bookmarks and click cut , you can not paste it. They are lost forever. Not Mac specific but it would be nice if it got fixed for linux :)

  37. This goes a lot deeper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should be asking themselves "What sucks about the Mac?".

  38. Crashes and quirks in FF on Macs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my experience, FF on Mac crashes a bit too often. And I know it's not just me who's experiencing this. Other things I've had problems with are odd graphical quirks, such as some divs "bleeding" into the scrollbar, straight lines being broken off etc, while the same sites seem to have no such quirks in neither Linux or Windows.

  39. Just Say No to Native Form Widgets. by aashenfe · · Score: 0

    Native Form Widgets scare me.

    What scares me is the Mac version of Firefox will act different than the normal version, and will cause a lot of problems for my web applications

    I've already run into problems with Mac Firefox because of the scrollbars (I believe they are os native). I had a scrollable div in the center of the screen that I would fill with data using AJAX. Most of the time the div is hidden. On Mac, the div was invisible, but the scrollbars cut out a blank area in the underlying page. I had to set overflow to clip instead of scroll everytime i would hide the div. It worked fine on all other OS's and even IE.

    The point is I should be able to test firefox on one platform and expect it to work the same on all Firefox's on any OS it supports.

    So I feel Native widgets on any OS is a slippery slope that will cause more harm than good for Firefox.

    1. Re:Just Say No to Native Form Widgets. by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

      What scares me is the Mac version of Firefox will act different than the normal version, and will cause a lot of problems for my web applications

      I'm trying to let "normal version" slide, but I'll at least laugh at it :)

      The point is I should be able to test firefox on one platform and expect it to work the same on all Firefox's on any OS it supports.

      Wow, you're missing the whole point of separating presentation and functionality. What if someone increases font size? Do you handle that? And you don't care about people using other browsers like Camino that have been using native widgets for a while now? Don't design web sites that are based around these kinds of details.

    2. Re:Just Say No to Native Form Widgets. by aashenfe · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I said it this way because the Linux Version and the Windows version act alike while I've had some difficulty with the Mac version.

      To give another example of what worries me on Mac Firefox: Take IE for example. I use SuckerFish Menu's on a some of my pages. The great thing about them is that they use the css standard. A bit of javascript fixes IE problems so they works. It also will layout on other devices that don't support CSS well (A BlackBerry for instance). But on IE (It's works on 7 actually), the select box which is an OS native widget insists on floating above everything else including my menu's.

      I really don't want to see these kind of problems on the Mac client. My worry is the OS native widgets will lead to this kind of problem.

      I think they should go ahead and change the look and feel of the Mac client if they want. Theme the widgets to look like mac widgets, and even make them act like Mac widgets (keyboard shortcuts and such). Just don't use the OS's native widgets. I believe it will just lead to more bugs in the Mac version that are not in the other versions.

    3. Re:Just Say No to Native Form Widgets. by Zonk+(troll) · · Score: 1

      Native Form Widgets scare me. ... What scares me is the Mac version of Firefox will act different than the normal version, and will cause a lot of problems for my web applications By "normal version" do you mean the Windows version? Currently for non-Windows systems, Firefox gives hideous Windows 95-ish controls. Under XP it follows your theme. Even third party msstyles. It should be like that on all platforms.

      I'm a Linux and OS X user, and having to look at those ugly widgets that are very out of place is very irritating. The only reason I don't switch to Camino on OS X or Konqueor on Linux (I'm a GNOME user, btw) is due to extensions. It's also quite annoying having Firefox be the only application that doesn't follow your icon theme. Those default icons look very out of place.

      So I feel Native widgets on any OS is a slippery slope that will cause more harm than good for Firefox. Native widgets are a good thing.
      --
      "The Federal Reserve is a fraudulent system."--Lew Rockwell
      End The FED. -
    4. Re:Just Say No to Native Form Widgets. by aashenfe · · Score: 1

      I'm a Linux and OS X user, and having to look at those ugly widgets that are very out of place is very irritating. The only reason I don't switch to Camino on OS X or Konqueor on Linux (I'm a GNOME user, btw) is due to extensions. It's also quite annoying having Firefox be the only application that doesn't follow your icon theme. Those default icons look very out of place.

      True that it is annoying that it Firefox Doesn't follow the theme. And I'm not saying the the widgets shouldn't look like the ones for the OS.

      What I'm saying is Firefox should stick to one graphic toolkit on every platform. Right now that is GTK+

      Native widgets are a good thing.

      If that is true than Firefox should us QT widgets when I'm in KDE, and EFL when I'm in Enlightenment and Motif when I'm on Aix, and Whatever sun uses in the Openwin Evironment. And then on Windows the select box can float above all other widgets no matter what zlayer it is on just like IE.

      And then new releases can take longer as they try to work the bugs out of all supported toolkits.

      And then we can test our web applications agains't all versions in case the different widgets don't function the same.

      Sound like a lot of fun!

    5. Re:Just Say No to Native Form Widgets. by HomerJ · · Score: 1

      Yes, this breaks among other things, Lotus's webmail client. It works fine in firefox in Windows and Linux(even Linux/PPC). I always thought about submitting a bug request for it, but never got around to it.

      I just end up using safari, which defaults to their really plain Jane version of webmail. It's good enough to check email away from the office. But it doesn't fix the fact that Firefox for OSX doesn't work correctly.

    6. Re:Just Say No to Native Form Widgets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you like the mouse and aggravatingly inefficient controls, native form widgets are great. I use Firefox on my Mac because it DOESN'T use native form widgets.

    7. Re:Just Say No to Native Form Widgets. by BZ · · Score: 1

      > What I'm saying is Firefox should stick to one graphic toolkit on every platform. Right now
      > that is GTK+

      GTK+ is only used on Linux. On Windows and Mac the native widget sets are used for UI rendering as much as possible...

    8. Re:Just Say No to Native Form Widgets. by Myen · · Score: 1

      The scrollbar thing, I think, is just a Mozilla bug and doesn't really have much to do with native form widgets. I believe it's supposed to be a bit better in Firefox 3 too.

      If you want to force native widgets to go away, use the vendor-specific CSS -moz-appearance: none !important;

      Mozilla's always had a little less love than Win32 and Linux, but it is slowly getting better - I guess having a bunch of developers run Macs helped :)

  40. Sure, I've got one by pongo000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fix the damn file associations dialog so that you can not only add file associations and actions from the GUI (rather than digging down into an .rdf file), but that files of the same type open consistently without constantly having to deal with the "open with" dialog.

    Oh, wait...same problem on Linux too! Never mind...

    1. Re:Sure, I've got one by Voline · · Score: 1

      Check out RCDefault App It adds a System Preference Pane that allows you to manage default applications and file type associations with a GUI!

    2. Re:Sure, I've got one by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I remember trying to convince Mozilla developers that a user really means to listen to live radio when he/she clicks on a .pls link, at least 99% does and it should open the file without asking to open or save but nobody was impressed.

      This happens very very long time ago, even before end user friendly fork Firefox appears.

      Still, same kind of people (not ff developers) flame Apple for auto opening files which are registered to system. Eh, guy dragged the thing to his /Applications folder at first place. Installed it and it registered its file types to OS. It also asks whether to open first time. Still, Apple should show a cryptic mime type to end user and will ask to pick application if he dares to say "open".

      What I mean is, when people tell Apple made first general end usable Unix desktop, they mean that too. Apple's power comes from thinking about ordinary user. There is a lesson for open source as well as Firefox on this. Yes, "open with" dialog, explains a lot.

  41. F11 by xenn · · Score: 1

    Really? What does F11 do for you on Mac Firefox?

    I wish it worked like it does in windows, using all the screen real estate, complete with removing the Apple menu too. The only browser I remember having that very useful functionality was iCab, with it's Kiosk mode.

  42. Re:Here's a few by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ctrl + Tab works for most windows apps.

  43. popup menu problem with multiple screens by cyfer2000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have two screen attached to my mac, and if I put a firefox window in the second screen and type things in address bar or search bar, the popup menu appears in the first screen. Safari doesn't have this problem.

    --
    There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    1. Re:popup menu problem with multiple screens by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I see this a lot too. It's inconsistent, sometimes a drop-down menu shows up where it's supposed to be, sometimes it shows up on the other screen. Does this mean that the FF Mac developers aren't enlightened on the use of dual monitors? It sure seems like it.

    2. Re:popup menu problem with multiple screens by _LORAX_ · · Score: 1

      Yep... stopped using FF2.0 because of this bug.

      I have been using the Nightly's of Minefield ( FF3.0a4pre ) and it's fixed. Currently the alpha builds are incredibly stable and use 1/3 the memory that safari uses for the same workload. Occasionally it will get confused by google reader and take up too much CPU, but I just close that tab and it fixes it.

      It's stable enough that I'm using it as my default browser right now.

    3. Re:popup menu problem with multiple screens by chord.wav · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have the same setup and problem. I solved it by restarting FF.
      In my experience, it only happens if you started Firefox before attaching the second monitor.
      When you attach the second monitor prior to starting FF, it doesn't happen.

    4. Re:popup menu problem with multiple screens by spacefrog · · Score: 1

      It does the same thing on Linux. I get the occasional menu on the wrong screen, or if I'm really lucky, switching a tab will cause the ENTIRE Firefox window to move to the other screen. Click another tab...whoosh, back to other monitor. Annoying as hell.

  44. resizable search window by Anoraknid+the+Sartor · · Score: 1

    In Safari the "search" field next to the url bar is drag resizable. It's the one thing I miss in Firefox.

    Javascript heavy sites - particularly google maps mashups - seem to run a lot faster in firefox. It is also a lot less flaky than safari when doing a large amount of data entry through forms.

    Firefox window placement can be a bit flaky on dual monitor setup - the preference panel sometimes decides it will only live in one corner of the screen.

    For those who want Mac widgets in firefox, they are available in special builds...
    http://www.beatnikpad.com/archives/2007/03/29/fire fox-2002

    --
    Find Japanese addresses in English on Google Maps Japan: http://diddlefinger.com/
    1. Re:resizable search window by Logic+and+Reason · · Score: 1

      I know this is a poor substitute, but you can edit your userChrome.css file to change the size of Firefox's search bar.

  45. Native Form Widgets by proxy318 · · Score: 1

    One of the things that irritates me, as a webdeveloper, is that Safari uses native form widgets, which can not be styled, and act differently than the widgets in any other browser (the file browser is totally different, text boxes take up a different amount of space, etc.). The fact that I can make the widgets in Firefox look exactly how I want them to is a great benefit in my book.

    --
    Saying your "phone ran out of batteries" is like saying your "car ran out of gas tanks".
  46. Sync Bookmarks by user404 · · Score: 1

    Ok, I admit it... I have a Mac or three... a PC or four... a couple of Linux boxes too... guess I'm a tech junkie...

    The biggest PITA that I face is the which machine did I have that bookmark on? which Browser? Yea, I know that I can create a local web page, somehow push them to all the machines (some are on diffrent VPN's so just a local copy/server doesn't alway connect). I have seen programs that keep multiple IE Bookmarks in sync, or multiple Safari, even one or two that claims to keep the FireFox in sync, but no one program can keep all in sync. Would like it if I added/deleted/moved a bookmark on one browser, it's on all browsers. Also would be nice to have it generate a DECENT looking html page that I could post... Most look like someone's first attempt at a web page.

    --
    User not found: Please check the world and try again.
    1. Re:Sync Bookmarks by aierwin · · Score: 0

      what you need is an del.icio.us account

    2. Re:Sync Bookmarks by Gadjet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google for 'Google browser sync firefox extension' this does exactly what you've described

      I use it for 6 computers, all running different operation systems. I even have it syncing to my work computer. Its great.

    3. Re:Sync Bookmarks by IwarkChocobos · · Score: 1

      One word: FoxMarks https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/241 0 One of the best plugin's ever for people with multiple pc's. Syncs everytime you add or remove a bookmark, and close/open ffx.

    4. Re:Sync Bookmarks by doctorzizmore · · Score: 1

      Yes. Foxmarks rules. End of story.

      --
      People in bamboo houses shouldn't throw pandas...Jesus said that! -Ninja
  47. Here's one that drives me crazy by catbutt · · Score: 1

    I like to open multiple windows at once, and drag links from one window to the other, so that I can see both the source window contents and destination window contents at the same time.

    Problem is, if I try to drag one of the windows by its title bar, it will often, as soon as I let go, JUMP to the position of the other window.

    It happens if I don't first click before dragging the window. Even though dragging brings it to the top, somehow firefox is confused and screws up.

    To reproduce, open two FF windows, A and B. Make sure A is active. Drag B by its title bar. When you release, B is in the position of A, not where you dragged it.

  48. Firefoxy by Skidge · · Score: 1

    My main complaint seems like it's already mentioned: ugly form widgets. The first thing i do when I install Firefox on a Mac is to run it through Firefox, which pretties-up the form widgets.

    1. Re:Firefoxy by redshirt1111 · · Score: 1

      I love Firefox, and I love my Mac. Only real point of contention with Firefox on the Mac is the poor handling of bookmarks -- can't sort by right clicking, and Bookmarks Manager is clunky and non-intuitive. A small price to pay though for ad/flash free surfing goodness.

  49. Text box Key Shortcuts by Game+Genie · · Score: 1

    1. In any aqua text box pressing the up key on the first line goes to the beginning of the line, and down on the last line goes to the end of the line, thus in a single line of text (like a URL bar) up and down move to the beginning and end of the line. This does not work if Firefox. This shortcut is very much ingrained into my muscle memory (as I suspect it is for many other Mac users) and I would really appreciate it if Firefox would respect it. 2. This is a problem with all versions of Firefox: put the close tab buttons on the tabs. Better yet, use Camino's tab interface, it is perfect.

    1. Re:Text box Key Shortcuts by sarahbau · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. This is pretty much the only reason I can't stand to use FireFox. I'll put up with Safari's memory leak rather than not be able to use up, down, and shift-up in FireFox. I use FireFox when I use Windows or Linux, but on my Mac, I use Safari.

  50. Re:Here's a few [Command+~] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Thank you! I've been wanting to cycle between windows within an application for years, but it's never risen to the level of "must figure out how to do now". You've changed my life.

  51. Native form widgets by Trevin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Funny, this was one of my big complaints about Mozilla on Linux several years ago. At the time I was overruled by the developers who proclaimed XBL widgets were the right way to go. I agree that CSS styles should be allowed to override the default widget look, but I still think the default look should be taken from the native OS, not MS Windows 3.1. Even at that, some of the widgets -- or at least parts of them -- still can't be fully styled by CSS in Firefox.

  52. Unfortunately by paranode · · Score: 1

    Camino is great and it runs faster than Firefox but it lacks certain options in the configuration that Firefox has. I don't know why they chose to only give it a subset of configuration options but it definitely makes it less usable. They would not need to tweak Firefox toward the Mac much more if they would just expand Camino's configuration.

  53. Network Settings by donutello · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Firefox completely ignores all system network and proxy settings. Instead, you have to go in and configure your own for Firefox. The most annoying part of this is that Firefox's settings do not have the option to ignore simple hostnames. This makes it virtually useless for browsing intranet sites since you have to manually add each intranet site you want to visit to the exceptions list.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  54. Stop swapping, dammit! by CelticWhisper · · Score: 1

    Please fix the (apparent) memory management, or rather mis-management, problem. Maybe this is something external to Firefox, or maybe it's a problematic extension, but it should NOT take 30 seconds for a context menu to show up on a G5 Quad. Furthermore, my hard disk should NOT be going batshit when I have 2.5 GB of real, honest-to-Bob memory for Firefox to play with.

    Anyone else experience this ludicrous right-click delay? It's not enough to drive me away from Firefox (or, rather, extensions are enough to get me to stay), but it is nothing short of maddening.

    --
    Help protect civil rights from abuse by the TSA - visit TSA News Blog.
    http://www.tsanewsblog.com
  55. Camino by WingedEarth · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Mozilla already designed a version of Firefox that's better on Macs. It's called Camino. It's been out for a while, so there's no reason for you to be complaining.

  56. OH DEAR LORD YES FIX THE DAMN DUAL MONITOR THING by csoto · · Score: 1

    I truly love Firefox, but I switched back to Safari because it properly handles dual monitor setups. Most of the Mac users I know have at least 2 monitors. Macs invented the damn thing back in the '80s (ok maybe X terminals did that, too, but I digress). The most annoying thing is the popups showing up on the opposite monitor from the one showing the current (topmost) window! Ugh! So-so usable for keyboarding, but not for mousing!

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  57. Re:Camino [Camino rocks but...] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried Camino and it is very nice. BUT...

    The one thing that keeps me tied to Firefox as a "must have" are the extensions.

    Otherwise Firefox is kind of clunky and I'd use something else. But I love Adblock, NoScript, Cookiesafe, Flashblock... That's also the reason I quit using Konqueror in linux and Safari.

  58. one simple: make sure that "home" & "end" wor by cpotoso · · Score: 1

    Home and End keys do not work as expected (go to the beginning and to the end of a line of text, respectively). I find this tremendously irritating.

  59. Easy by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

    Make it look really snazzy and remove 90% of the features.

    The Mac advocates will fucking cream themselves.

    1. Re:Easy by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Make it look really snazzy and remove 90% of the features.

      The Mac advocates will fucking cream themselves.


      Sorry, I hit submit too fast. I meant to add that they should change the license to Shareware and charge at least $40 for it (and also add a feature that deletes your home directory if you try and pirate it).

      The money can then be put towards funding development on non-proprietary hardware and operating systems.

    2. Re:Easy by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Cute try, troll.

  60. SVG by whiteSanjuro · · Score: 1

    i'm working on a webapp with several others devs, one using amd64 linux and another using xp, while i rock out on my macbook. we are doing a lot with SVG for our UI and about 95% of our problems have been with rendering SVG (across platforms). the biggest problem is that a page with some 5000 elements takes about 2-3 seconds to load on both the linux and windows side, but about 50 seconds for the mac, despite the fact that the mac has a core duo cpu and 4X more memory than either linux or windows.

  61. PDF integration anyone? by cbc1920 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't believe this hasn't been harped on before. Why can't I open a PDF in my browser window? I'm on a Intel Mac and as far as I know there is no way to do this. Macs have so much built in that already uses the pdf format- why is this so difficult?

    1. Re:PDF integration anyone? by 200_success · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hear, hear! Integration with PDF Kit would be awesome. Viewing PDFs in Safari is so quick and easy, since it's natively supported, with no need to launch any plugins or external applications. Not only do PDFs render in the browser window, File -> Save and File -> Print work too! Firefox should have the same native support for PDFs on Macs.

    2. Re:PDF integration anyone? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      To each his own, but there was just a thread the other day with the majority of us bitching about how badly PDF within browser windows sucks. Even worse are Word and PowerPoint files from within a browser window!

    3. Re:PDF integration anyone? by keytoe · · Score: 1

      I hated it when Apple decided that Safari should be used to view PDFs inside a browser window instead of in, say, a PDF viewer. In the browser, you have no control over the zoom level (which is ALWAYS too small) and you have no way to jump directly to a specific page. When I need to see page 623 of a 1000 page document, the last thing I want to do is scroll the damned window around hunting for it. People put tables of contents in documents for a reason. I'm honestly baffled why anyone thinks that this is a better solution than just firing open Preview (which launches in roughly .5 seconds).

      FYI - you can disable this bone-headed behavior at the command line. Make sure Safari isn't running, then type "defaults write com.apple.Safari WebKitOmitPDFSupport -bool YES" into the terminal.

    4. Re:PDF integration anyone? by otter42 · · Score: 1

      Different strokes for different folks. I hate that Camino doesn't natively open pdfs in the browser window. I see pdfs as just another webpage.

      Did you know that if you right click on a pdf opened inside Safari that it gives you the option to open the pdf inside preview? This might help you with your problem.

      --
      www.eissq.com/BandP.html Ball and Plate System. Amuse your friends. Crush your enemies.
    5. Re:PDF integration anyone? by keytoe · · Score: 1

      Did you know that if you right click on a pdf opened inside Safari that it gives you the option to open the pdf inside preview? This might help you with your problem.

      Ayup - I knew that, but why would I want to add an extra step into the process? My goal is to always have PDFs viewed by an application designed for it and my web pages viewed by an application designed for web browsing. The hidden preference option is ideal for getting the behavior I want. Having to clumsily provide additional input isn't.

      I belong to the 'simple tools that work together' school of design, so monolithic apps that do everything irk me. Different strokes and all :)

    6. Re:PDF integration anyone? by shawnce · · Score: 1

      Try right-clicking (or control-left-click) when Safari is showing a PDF.

    7. Re:PDF integration anyone? by keytoe · · Score: 1

      Try right-clicking (or control-left-click) when Safari is showing a PDF.
      Or I could change the behavior with the preference hack so that it always worked the way I want with a single click instead of two.
  62. Camino NOT a Firefox replacement by HomerJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's a ton of people complaining "Yeah, all this is already done, It's Camino!"

    Listen, Camino isn't a Firefox replacement. The reason I, and probably the majority of others, use Firefox is the large amount of great extensions. Ad Black, Flashblock, Cookiesafe, etc. Camino by rule will never support these. That's why Camino will never be a replacement for Firefox.

    I'm not saying Camino SHOULD change to support them. They have a project going, and what they are setting out to do, they do well. But it's never going to replace Firefox on OSX.

    1. Re:Camino NOT a Firefox replacement by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      But [Camino is] never going to replace Firefox on OSX
      I disagree, because for me, it already has. I don't need all the Firefox plug-ins you listed, nor do most average users even know what those things do. I started using Camino because Firefox crashes at least twice per session, and I'm not smart enough to know why. Camino doesn't crash, ever (or at least not yet, in about 2 or 3 months of use). Therefore, I'll deal with the lack of plug-in support that I don't need and use the faster, more stable, more Mac-like browser. Firefox feels like a port of a PC product and Camino is OS X through-and-through.
    2. Re:Camino NOT a Firefox replacement by HomerJ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, exactly the point of Camino. Firefox does X+Y, but Camino does X+Z. There are things that Camino does better, such as keychain integration, being Cocoa native, etc. To a lot of people, such as yourself, these are more important features than plugin support. The group saw that, created Camino.

      There's just another portion that likes the plugins. Both programs serve two different purposes. It's good that there ARE separate programs. I'm not going to use MS Paint to edit wedding pictures, and I'm not going to use Photoshop to resize a bitmap to print it out.

      The nice thing about what Camino does, is that they based it on Gecko. So if someone wants the features of Firefox, or the features of Camino, they don't have to worry about how the page is going to load. Good thing to choose a browser because of just the feature set, and not if a page is going to load correctly(Yeah, I'm talking about IE).

    3. Re:Camino NOT a Firefox replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      safariblock

  63. UNO makes Firefox look a lot prettier on OS X by spam38 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The way Firefox looked in OS X always kinda bugged me, and in my search for a more OSXish theme, I've found UNO. I'd try to explain what it is, but you'd be better off checking the website: http://gui.interacto.net/. There's also a Firefox theme that pretty much completes the package at http://www.takebacktheweb.org/. Its called "GrApple (UNO)".

  64. It doesn't suck by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    I use it all day on Mac & Win. I do not think it sucks. It's great! But, since you're asking, here's my main request:

    (1) Please keep up to pace in the arms race against web designers who insist on trying to get around Animation/BlinkyPicture/Marquee-TypeText blocking. Please. I don't want to go back to the days of putting Post-its on my monitor.

  65. Don't like it on ANY system by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

    Not that it's a bad piece of software, but I dislike almost all the interface elements after having gotten used to Opera. The problem is that I can't do any useful key rebinding to make Firefox like I'd like it work. "Ctrl-N" for me has always been 'new tab' and I'm not going to train myself out of it. (Actually, I've tried, and it's not worth my time. :P)

    I THINK I'd be able to rebind the keys at home with Firefox and OS X, since that's the sort of thing that OS X does for you, instead of forcing every application to handle it itself.

    There may even be a plug-in that does it, but I haven't been able to find one. I suppose I could write one (could I?), but Opera on Windows and Safari on OS X just work so well, I have no reason to switch.

    Maybe that's it: I already have really good tools, so why switch? For the sake of switching? What do I get by moving to Firefox? It's not like moving from IE to Firefox, where there's an obvious technology gap.

    1. Re:Don't like it on ANY system by Myen · · Score: 1

      keyconfig should be able to do what you want. Of course, staying with Opera is a valid option too; choice is good. But Firefox is not Opera, nor is Opera Firefox. :) (So "make it be exactly the same as Opera" isn't exactly something they can do)

    2. Re:Don't like it on ANY system by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's fine. I use Opera at work on my Windows PC and Safari at home on my Mac, so I don't need them to be exactly the same. Just some of the more coarse features need to be the same. :)

      Thanks for the tip; I'll take a look at it. :)

  66. Option+W !! by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Unless I'm missing something: When only one tab remains, Option + W will not close the window as in every other app.

    Thanks BTW!

  67. Re:Here's a few (more) by MachineShedFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Recognize when someone changes the network location, and adjust proxy settings accordingly.

    This bugs the crap out of me, and is the primary reason why Firefox isn't used on my MacBook Pro.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  68. Re:Here's a few by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have maximize remove useless title bar.
    Make alt-tab cycle distinct windows.
    Recognize ctrl-based shortcuts.
    Have a close button on the preferences window.

    Otherwise it's the best software available for the Mac, after Boot Camp.


    This pretty much sums up the problem with Firefox on the Mac. You have too many people who use it on Linux and Windows who want it to behave exactly as it does on those platforms. On the other hand, you have a lot of Mac users who don't like it because it doesn't behave and feel like a Mac app. Any Mac user will tell you that command-tab should cycle you through apps, and command-~ should cycle you through windows in an app, but then you have Windows users who aren't used to this functionality.

    From the comments in this story, it seems like the biggest selling point of Firefox is the plugins. It would probably be a better effort to make Firefox plugins work with Camino (an already excellent Mac browser) than to try and Mac-ify Firefox.
  69. My submission by Voline · · Score: 1

    Let me begin by saying that there is no other browser I will use on Windows other than Firefox. On those rare occasions when I have to install Windows, the first thing I do is use IE to download Firefox. Then I delete all references to IE (as much as possible) install Firefox and use it exclusively from there on out. On Linux I use Firefox -- even though Konqueror doesn't suck.

    But on the Mac I use Camino and to a lesser extent Safari. The ideal browser for OSX would be Camino with access to the full range of Firefox plug-ins. I use Camitools now, but I'd love more.

    Things I like from other browsers:

    • Native interface elements! XUL is fine for Windows and X11 but not for OS X!
    • Camino and Safari's light weight feel and speed.
    • Camino and Safari's bookmark management.
    • I like Safari's ability to define a personal CSS stylesheet.
    • I love Safari's integration with OS X services like Dictionary.app.
    • Omniweb will delete all cookies after each session.
    • Omniweb's ability to set preferences on a per-site basis! Killer!
    • Opera's built-in BitTorrent client.
    • Shiira's OSX-System-Preferences-like Preference window.
    • iCab's ability to auto-refresh a local web page when you save changes to the source file -- Excellent for web development!
    • Firefox needs a better application icon. I know the current one is a big hit, but that's in the context of Windows icons. It isn't in the same league as the best from OS X: Transmit, Watson, App Zapper, Goban and anything by Dave Brasgalla. Hire Brasgalla to design a new one.

    Seriously, adopt Camino as the main branch of Firefox for OSX and start there. Keep it lean, but allow people to load up the extensions if they want.

  70. oh god no not keychain support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last thing I need is firefox asking me for the fucking keychain password every ten seconds.

  71. A tiny thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would really like to be able to tab to drop boxes. In windows I can hit a letter key (like T twice to get Texas when picking my state) on a drop box to cycle through the options. On a mac, I can't even tab onto it. So tiny but really annoying when filling out forms.

  72. Help Make Camino Suck Less by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

    After reading some of the responses here, I think the question needs to be turned around. What really needs to be done is to incorporate some of the useful FF features into Camino. If I could use FF extensions in Camino, I'd be a Camino user in a heartbeat.

  73. Re:Here's a few (more) by battjt · · Score: 1

    YES!

    I always SOCKS proxy over SSH with wireless (I'm on the road) and don't when I'm plugged in (in the office). All my apps other than Firefox figure this out transparently.

    I haven't noticed any other problems, but I use Windows, Linux and Mac interchangably everyday. I wouldn't notice any unMac things.

    Joe

    --
    Joe Batt Solid Design
  74. I wish there was an equivalent of Camino for Linux by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    In all honesty, Firefox sucks. It's been 4 years now since they separated the browser from the suite and they still have dangling, nonfunctional menu options referring to email. The "UI integration" is a joke. Scrolling has been broken in compositing WMs ever since Xorg 6.9. The filetype/plugin menus haven't been improved at all since they were first added in one of the 0.x releases.
    Konqueror is nice but it's not really an option until I can use all my userContent.css hacks in it.

  75. Integrated J2ME in the Browser by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

    Lets just replace javascript with bytecode once and for all and the J2ME code is only about 1.5 MB, is sandboxed and would integrate far better with server side applications than AJAX. Why isn't anyone pushing for J2ME or some other solution embedded within browsers?

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  76. Type tracking problem in Mac Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a serious type tracking problem with Mac Firefox that doesn't exist in any other Mac or Windows browser I've seen: certain typefaces will be rendered much too tightly at some sizes, but properly at others. It's bizarre. For example, Mac Firefox will render 12px Georgia horribly but 13px Georgia fine! I've put up a couple of screenshots that show this clearly regardless of what browser/platform you're on. You can see them at http://newsblues.awardspace.com/.

    Another problem (less serious, but still annoying) is that in Mac Firefox you can't drag bookmarks and bookmark folders around within the regular bookmark menus, the way you can in Windows Firefox. You have to do everything from inside the "Organize Bookmarks" window, just like in other (non-Firefox) browsers.

  77. Don't bother... by argent · · Score: 1

    Camino already does most of that stuff, and it doesn't have the buggy and insecure XPI problem.

  78. Labels for bookmarks with smart folders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My biggest grievance is with the bookmarking. Instead of a tree-based organization system, why can't we try a tagging or label system where any particular bookmark can have multiple labels and then appear is various locations. And then add smart folders than automatically update when new bookmarks are added.

    I find the current system inherently inflexible. I can never get things organized because I can't reconcile that fact that some things belong in more than one place.

  79. On a similar note by earnest+murderer · · Score: 1

    An option to keep Safari and FF bookmarks synced and therefore backed up to .mac.

    --
    Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
  80. I don't know why people even use FF on a mac ... by Alligator427 · · Score: 1

    The Mac Version of Firefox needs a *lot* of help. IMO, Firefox is one of the *worst* browser options on the mac. I use it for front end development work, because it has the best javascript console and dom imspector out there, in addition to many handy developer extensions, but for regular browsing just about any other mac browser is better IMHO.

    The biggest problem with FF on a mac is that it is not a Coccoa app, which makes it feel like a shitty port of the Windows version of Firefox. Not making firefox a Coccoa app causes the application to feel incredibly wonky (sluggish, unresponsive, awkward) and not tie into various OS-level niceties that Mac Users expect in every app. FF on a mac, feels like a windows app, that just happens to run in Mac OS X, It takes the users OS away from them to a degree. I chose to use a mac, because I like the way macs work, and if your app violates the standard behaviour/feel of my OS of choice, I won't use it.

    • The chrome rendering sucks, often causing unsightly rendering artifacts when you have moving/resizing page elements with a scrollbar.
    • Javascript performance is pitiful, particuarly when it comes to time-based manipulation of css properties (css-based animation).
    • Its a non-cocoa app ... WTF?. That means that firefox misses out on many system-wide capabilities (hooks to dictionary.app are lost, lost emacs key bindings, no applescript support, type rendering is not as good as Cocoa apps, etc ... ).
    • The non-native form widgets suck. (this is another cocoa related problem, but it merits its own line item).
    • The chrome rendering sucks, often causing unsightly rendering artifacts when you have moving/resizing page elements with a scrollbar.
    • It takes a year and a day to launch on my Macbook Pro, even with 3gb of ram.
    • Page loads are slow.
    • No support for ICC/colorsync profiles
    • The default theme doesn't comply very closely to Apple's UI Guidelines
    • Many window positioning bugs (probably related to the fact that this is a non-cocoa app)
    • Firefox is a huge-ass resource hog ...
    --
    -JoeBoy
  81. Uhh.. i WANT those plugins, why not both? by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    i absolutely despise how i have to choose between the two when i want both.

    specifically i want the FLV (youtube leech) plugin so i dont have to go fishing through the activity window.

    why on mac of all platforms should i have to choose betwee customizability and os integration.

    heck.. that kind of choice sounds more like a windows idea to me.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  82. Works better on a Mac already by Not-a-Neg · · Score: 1

    Firefox works better on a Mac for me, than it does on Windows XP. That's probably due to Java working better on the Mac than in XP. There are several websites I goto that work perfectly in Firefox on my Mac, but fail to load images, text and other elements in Firefox on XP. Performance is fast enough that I don't notice it, and the only thing that bothers me about the toolbar is that it's too easy to hit the drop-down on the back button then the back button itself.

    --
    -==- Buy a Mac and leave me alone!
  83. Re:I wish there was an equivalent of Camino for Li by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    usercontent.css is supported in almost all browsers (even IE!)

    http://wiki.noljads.com/User_Stylesheets#Konqueror _3.5.3

  84. S L O W on M A Cs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FireFox is Very, Very Slow in OS X

    Can someone code an OPTIMIZED universal binary of FireFox for OS X Macintosh computers?

    1. Re:S L O W on M A Cs by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      "Can someone code an OPTIMIZED universal binary of FireFox for OS X Macintosh computers?"

      Optimized versions have been around for a while.

      http://www.beatnikpad.com/archives/2006/10/26/fire fox-20

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
    2. Re:S L O W on M A Cs by aliensporebomb · · Score: 1

      It really depends largely on what CPU you're using, what graphics card
      you're using and what VERSION of OS X you're running too.

      So, if you're running a G4/400 with a Radeon 8500 graphics card and
      Tiger, your bottleneck is in the slow bus of that machine.

      A G5 or Intel Mac is going to have a faster buses (front side
      and video) and simply is more geared for doing more "stuff".

      The last generation of G5 Macs with PCI Express video and the
      latest generation of Intel Macs with the same should be fastest
      but the 8x AGP G5s are pretty darn respectable too.

      But if you want "speed in browsing" look at Opera, Camino or
      some of the development builds of Safari. Even the optimized
      builds of Firefox aren't as fast as those it seems.

  85. On Mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about on Linux? At least, on MY machine. I have an old, small monitor I intend to keep using until it catches fire or otherwise goes completely dark. I don't like to waste money buying crap I don't need to buy.

    It's a 14" model, and there is a lot of wasted screen real estate in the Linux version. The Windows version doesn't have such big bars or that big empty spece between the URL window and the actual screen space, but I've disabled networking in Windows for obvious reasons.

    Is it THAT bad on the mac? If so, won't one of the other browsers (Opera, Safari, etc) do?

  86. Just use Camino by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  87. Mod parent up! by los+furtive · · Score: 1

    You just identified my biggest beef about FFox. If I said I wanted Flip4Win to open all my .wmv files then gosh darn it sure would be nice if FFox actually did that, instead of prompting me each time.

    --

    I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  88. No Keychain integration by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

    Please, please, please do not add keychain integration to Firefox on the Mac!!!! The main reason why I use FF rather than Safari is because FF does not have this. I do not use Safari because it seems to want my keyhain password every 3 seconds, asking multiple times in a row before I can even do anything. I do not use the keychain, I do not know what my keychain password is, I don't care what it is, and I can't seem to find any way to turn it the fuck off or otherwise delete that useless bitch. If you DO add keychain to FF, please at least provide a clear, easy to find, and comprehensive way to TURN IT OFF as far as Firefox is concerned. Otherwise, I will have to find a new browser ):

    1. Re:No Keychain integration by JoshRazz · · Score: 1

      It won't do that if the keychain is unlocked. If you forgot the password, you can reset the keychain by trashing ~/Library/Keychains/login.keychain, logging out and then logging back in. A new login.keychain will automatically be created and will be unlocked as soon as you log in.

  89. I weep for Apple Fanboydom. by woadlined · · Score: 1, Troll

    This thread is a shining, comedic gem.

    I'm glad I turned my head from Apple before most of you hysterical folks got converted.

  90. Get Apple to do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac users give almost NOTHING back to the open source community. There are scores and scores of Mac-only open source applications, and every BSD/Linux app under the sun has been ported to OS X, but you NEVER see OS X developers release cross platform software, so I don't see why I should have to spend any of my time helping OS X users when they never spend any time helping anyone else.

    1. Re:Get Apple to do it. by woadlined · · Score: 1, Troll

      Excellent point. What part of the Apple "experience" really lends itself to OSS? They're a black hole for OSS.

    2. Re:Get Apple to do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac users give almost NOTHING back to the open source community. There are scores and scores of Mac-only open source applications, and every BSD/Linux app under the sun has been ported to OS X, but you NEVER see OS X developers release cross platform software, so I don't see why I should have to spend any of my time helping OS X users when they never spend any time helping anyone else. How can they possibly release if the toolkits they use ar OS X only? Other operating systems doesn't have that technology, period. It doesn't "compile", it says "cocoa.h not found",how can I explain and why am I replying to an AC? Anyway, better reply as AC.

    3. Re:Get Apple to do it. by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Excellent point. What part of the Apple "experience" really lends itself to OSS? They're a black hole for OSS. II have installed the famous Ubuntu just 3 days ago, 6.x version, I felt like I am in OS X minus font smoothing and fan noise.

      Not saying anything else.

  91. WORD - this has been in bugzilla *far* too long! by IdahoEv · · Score: 1

    This bug has been there since Firefox 1.0. It's been in the bugzilla database for mozilla, item 306276 since August of 2005, and is marked "critical".

    As someone who uses Firefox on the mac about 14 hours/day, it is far and away the most annoying part of the experience, because all the other issues can be worked around. With this bug you simply need to keep dragging your window over and over until Firefox lets it stay where it is (it seems to have something to do with other windows actively refreshing at the time). It frequently takes me 4 or 5 sequential efforts to move a window where I want it.

    Lots of users are working on trying to make a perfect test case - the bug annotations get a new note at least once a week - but AFAICT no coders are actively working on solving it. If you have the skills to work on this problem (I don't), please join the team and contribute.

    --
    I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
  92. PDF handling by dmnic · · Score: 1

    maybe this a PPC thing (all of my Macs are various G4s) but you can not open a .pdf in the browser window. when you click a link to a .pdf, new Firefox windows will spawn and the only way to make it stop is to quit Firefox.
    to view a .pdf, we have to right-click the link and save, then view it in Preview.

    I have no other complaints about Firefox on OS X.

  93. Solution...Safari Tab? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Actually you can do it but you have to run Firefox in rosetta mode (so its performance is crap) and then you can use the PowerPC PDF plugin so it is not an acceptable solution. I would broaden your request to "support for Safari plugins" because as well as PDF Java does not work properly under Firefox on a Mac. I understand it is possible to fix it by installing another Java distribution but that is a major pain. Since this is likely to be a major undertaking why not take a leaf out of the Windows Firefox book and add a Safari tab?

  94. Features from other browsers by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Having moved to Firefox, I miss the instant HTML validation of iCab, but I miss more the OmniWeb ability to edit the markup of a page and then redisplay it as if it had come from the website that way. That feature in OmniWeb has allowed me to submit forms on sites that were broken as well as quickly reorganize a web page's graphics to make it suitable as a DVD menu without resorting to compositing in Photoshop.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  95. Re:Here's a few (more) by shane2uunet · · Score: 1

    FF doesn't integrate well with OSX, but just get the "SwitchProxy" Extension. It allows you to easily have numerous proxies and switch between them.

    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/125

    --
    This space available for rent.
  96. Is this about adoption rates? by aibrahim · · Score: 1

    I am not sure if this is really about making the "best possible" OS X browser, but rather that Firefox uptake on the Mac is not as high as it is on Windows?

    The reason is simple: Safari doesn't suck. I find IE unbearable for a thousand tiny reasons, so I pretty much have to install Firefox straight away on Windows. I don't have the same unbearable need to change on OS X. Despite having both installed I just go ahead and use Safari.

    So, what were my reasons for sticking to Safari last time I checked out Firefox?

    Safari has a neat feature where you can right click on the bookmark bar folders and read all my RSS articles. The bookmarks bar is constantly updated with counts of new RSS articles for each folder. This is a trivial feature and I am sure there must be a plug in for FF that accomplishes the same thing. It should be in the core though.

    Bonjour integration is nice in Safari, although in practice it rarely gets used.

    Firefox should integrate better with the included OS X applications. (Address Book, iCal, Mail etc.)

    Improve the integrated as you type spell checker. Of importance- just freaking use the OS X dictionary. Apple updates and maintains that nicely, so use it. Don't re invent the wheel. At least make this a config option.

    You should be able to configure Firefox to utilize Safari Keychain entries. Changing back and forth between these apps should be utterly painless.

    Firefox should have an option to synchronize its bookmarks in a couple more ways- out of the box without plug-ins
    1) There should be a transparent sync mode that makes sure Safari and Firefox both have the same bookmarks and history all the time. If I make a new bookmark in Safari, then swith over to a FF window that bookmark should appear in FF in the correct place live, as if I had added it directly in FF. This feature needs to be bi-directional.
    2) You should be able to use Apple Sync services with Firefox. I think if you accomplish #1 above you should effectively get this for free.

    Some of these features may be in FF, or they may be in Camino now. I haven't looked seriously in at least a year, and it is entirely possible I just gave up too quick when I did check. If so please reply with more accurate information.

    For what its worth, adding similar features to the Windows version couldn't hurt.

    --

    Don't post innacurate information
    If you do, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you.
  97. Safari... by 7Prime · · Score: 1

    I use Firefox on my PowerBook, I love it. But to be honest, MacOS X already has an [almost]-Firefox-quality web browser at its disposal already. For this reason, it's not as imparative that it be as top-notch as its PC counterpart.

    Seriously, there's only three reasons I use Firefox over Safari:
    - the "type to search" system in Firefox is unholy goodness
    - allowing the addressbar to be "programmed" to search various sites via keywords is amazing
    - plugins (of which I find myself not using very many of)

    These are three great little features, but they're neither central nor paramount to the usability of a web browser. As for rendering quality, accuracy, and speed, the two are practically on par. Safari even has one major advantage over Firefox... its look and feel, and the robustness of its UI is MUCH better. I'm currently running a number of themes and plugins in Firefox to make the browser look and act like Safari, because I think its UI is far superior.

    I'm forced to use IE at work, which makes me wanna vom, in comparison. Mac users don't really NEED Firefox, okay? It's nice for Mac users to support the platform in order to get PC users away from IE, but I wouldn't feel guilty, in the slightest, for ditching Firefox for Safari.

    --
    Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    1. Re:Safari... by Tickletaint · · Score: 1

      Seriously, there's only three reasons I use Firefox over Safari:
      - the "type to search" system in Firefox is unholy goodness
      - allowing the addressbar to be "programmed" to search various sites via keywords is amazing
      - plugins (of which I find myself not using very many of)
      Check out the Safari plugins available at www.pimpmysafari.com. Typeahead search and address bar search shortcuts are there (and do check out Inquisitor for an even more elegant solution than address bar shortcuts, even if the developer, Dave Watanabe, is a raging prick).
      --
      Make Slashdot readable! See journal.
  98. The Bridge Patter in GoF by sideswipe76 · · Score: 1

    In the Gang of Four Design Patterns book, they deal with a specific windowing example exactly like this using a bridge pattern. I don't remember the details, but it definitely deals with interfacing specific GUI widgets on different platforms

  99. Re:Here's a few by 3choTh1s · · Score: 1

    From the comments in this story, it seems like the biggest selling point of Firefox is the plugins. It would probably be a better effort to make Firefox plugins work with Camino (an already excellent Mac browser) than to try and Mac-ify Firefox.
    I'm going to reply here because it's reasonable relevant but there could be other places to stick this.

    I don't think that Mac-ifying Firefox would be harder than making extensions work in Camino. But unlike other people I don't think a rewrite of Firefox for OSX is in order. Instead we should just have a series of Mac related extensions for these types of things. Keychain integration? Extension. Native widgets? Extension. Mac key bindings? Extension. Each would be simple to do by itself and updated by itself. But implementing a good Extension manager for Camino would be much harder.
  100. bug fix3s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I notice that firefox on 10.4.9 has a couple of windowing quirks. If the downloads window is open, and the current browser window is closed, then the downloads window must first be closed before a new browser can be opened.

    also I noticed that if the browser windows can sometimes go nutty. I have a powerbook with external monitor as a second screen. Moving a browser window around on the second screen can cause it to jump back to the original screen. Usually happens if I am watching a flash based web video from somewhere like youtube.

    I would like better javascript control. I hate to go into the prefs to turn jscript on and off. A console that would show me what scripts are trying to do as they do it would be awsome. Like a terminal, but only for what pages are trying to do.. even cooler would be a terminal that not only shows what page scripts are trying to do, but would let me correct little things before actually running them. It would be an advanced feature that would slow normal page viewing, but I would like the control.

  101. A little late to get modded up... but.. by jhfry · · Score: 1

    One thing I don't like is how your tabs are not saved when the window is closed but firefox is not "quit".

    I often, out of windows habit, close the window... and only then remember to quit the application by right clicking on it in my dock and selecting quit.

    When I restart firefox... my tabs are not recovered.

    I would also like to see additional ff windows opened by clicking on the dock icon... perhaps only if ff already has the focus? This probably breaks a mac interface rule though.

    --
    Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
  102. not to nitpick, but safari isnt that great... by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    I like safari a lot.. but i'm really pissed at how i've been reporting slashdot crashing safari for the past 1.5 YEARS and apple has not fixed it.

    this is not some bum()*@#$ site.. it's slash-"over a million registered users"-dot.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:not to nitpick, but safari isnt that great... by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      Hm, I don't have any problems with slashdot on Safari. Are you sure it isn't Saft or Pithhelmet or something causing a problem? I've used both the Panther and Tiger versions of Safari with all the intermediate updates and never had a problem with a particular site crashing the browser (though of course some didn't work right).

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    2. Re:not to nitpick, but safari isnt that great... by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      i dont run any addons.. i stopped using pithhelmet when it caused safari to choke loading pages with flash ads.

      i have a way to repeat the the crashes. go to view comments, post one of your own, view it, click back a couple times trying to get back to the front page, enjoy the crash.

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    3. Re:not to nitpick, but safari isnt that great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then don't do that. The problem could be with Slashdot. Is thier html standards compliant? I'm posting this on Safari now, so I will try it out....

  103. TOO MANY GODDAMN CRASHES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firefox on OS X crashes on me, a LOT! Sometimes once or twice a day. This is my home machine so a "day" is anywhere from 30 minutes to 2 hours. This is unacceptable.

    1. Re:TOO MANY GODDAMN CRASHES!!! by jkmiecik · · Score: 1

      Huh? I just switched to Mac back in February, and I've NEVER seen Firefox crash.

  104. how about basic things like maximizing a window by Raul+Acevedo · · Score: 1

    I've been using Camino, but I miss some Firefox features (which I use at work on Windows XP), so I tried switching to FF at home and the first thing I noticed is that Firefox can't maximize a window properly:

    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37870 1

    Sigh. If FF can't properly implement one of the basic window operations available, it doesn't give me a lot of hope that they've really looked at it.

    --
    In a real emergency, we would have all fled in terror, and you would not have been notified.
  105. Just to note... Camino came out before Firefox. by Draconix · · Score: 1

    Camino (called Chimera before they had to change the name due to infringing on someone's trademark) came out before Phoenix (Firefox) in February of the same year Phoenix 0.1 was released. I'm not sure which started development first (as the articles on it seem a bit vague) and there is overlap between the teams who developed the browsers, but Camino had little to nothing to do with Firefox (aside from sharing developers) in its origins, and was about making a clean, lightweight browser based on the Mozilla engine, without the bloat and Mac-unfriendly UI and codebase of Mozilla.

    --
    By reading this you acknowledge that you have read it.
  106. Camino developers != Firefox developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many people who work on it are the same people who also work on Firefox [wikipedia.org]. The lead Camino developers already work for the Mozilla Foundation.



    FYI, both those statements are false; the wikipedia article is misleading. Mike Pinkerton doesn't work on Firefox (see his recent blog entries), and Josh Aas hasn't really contributed directly to Camino since he started working for Mozilla doing full time Firefox work (see recent checkin and bug activity for camino; yes, he is doing a lot of work in core code that will benefit Camino as much as Firefox, but he's not doing Camino development). There is basically no overlap between Camino developers and Firefox developers, and not a single Camino developer works for the Mozilla Foundation.

  107. I sent these in: by dwightk · · Score: 1

    system dictionary integration

    fewer pixels above and below toolbars and tabs

    allow aquafied widgets to be turned to graphite

    --
    Like anyone can even know that
  108. What sucks about Firefox on the Mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not OmniWeb.

  109. Re:Here's a few (more) by Bifurcati · · Score: 1

    Well said! Particularly when I have many sites open, if I go out of my office onto wireless for a bit, I have to open up Safari so as not to have to restart Firefox....sheesh!

  110. Suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suggestions:

    1. Make it so that contextual menus don't get stuck, orphaned, after I do something (still not sure what it is) that puts the context of interaction back in to the web page. Yes, I know I can press the escape key to make them go away, but Firefox is the ONLY Mac program where I've ever seen this occur, so I think it can and should be fixed.

    2. When I create a new window in Firefox (no, I don't like tabs) and Firefox offsets the new window down and to the right from the one that is already open, don't let the bottom of the new window fall off the bottom of the screen!

    3. Let me view and configure file types, mime types, their associations and behaviors. There's a section of the preferences where I can supposedly "view and edit actions" but I've never been able to usefully accomplish anything at all ever with this, and it appears to have no mechanism to create new "actions." This is stupid and obnoxious, just like it's stupid and obnoxious that OS X has no mechanism for editing the same things...

    4. Let me remove toolbar bookmarks from the toolbar by simply dragging them out. This is a Mac. We like to drag and drop things. I don't want to have visit the annoying Bookmark organizer thing to do this. To illustrate the correct behavior, look at Safari.

    5. In Firefox 2 the forward/back buttons have a very small area that you have to click on to get any response from the button. Make the button's active mask a rectangle the width of the button and as tall as the toolbar.

    6. When I update Firefox, don't be a jackass and have the browser load some bullshit "welcome - did you know that you just updated Firefox?" and "what's new!" pages. They're completely pointless and rather insulting. Since they serve no useful purpose from the user's perspective and are annoying, I have to conclude they only exist to beam version and usage statistics back to Mozilla -- which rubs me the wrong way. Yes, I know I can manually disable them via about:config (unlike with Camino, where there's no obvious way to say no), but I'd rather not be harassed in the first place.

    7. Support Services.

    8. Not specific to OS X: fix core bugs. There are bugs that have blighted Mozilla for five years, like the inability to split absolutely positioned frames. This particular bug makes it impossible to print many web pages. Printing is important to people. Printing works in other browsers. Many people thus use other browsers. There are other similarly tardy and debilitating bugs.

    Those are just the issues that come immediately to mind. There are others, but fixing these would be a great start.

  111. Stop Crashing by robw003 · · Score: 1

    Firefox on Mac crashes more than it does on other platforms (i.e. Linux and even Windows).

  112. Downloading... too much to ask? by GregNorc · · Score: 1

    I wish they'd fix this really odd error I've had since I upgraded to 2.0: I can't download files. For example, right clicking on a picture and trying to save it simple does not work. I can copy it, bring it into photoshop, and save it that way. I can open the link in Safari, and save it that way. I have no clue what's causing it, disabling extensions one by one doesn't fix it, reinstalling firefox doesn't fix it, and it doesn't happen on my linux box or when I run windows in Boot Camp.

  113. trackpad unfriendly by swell · · Score: 1

    I'd love to add to that blog but it seems I have to be a Member or something before I can post.

    So here's my beef:

    As of V2.003 I am now unable to use contextual menus in Firefox with my Mac laptop. The usual double tap for contextual menu no longer works. Now I must lift my other hand from my lap to press CTRL while my trackpad hand leaves the trackpad to press the 'mouse' button. The contextual menu then appears and my lap hand can return to its previous activity.

    Before V2 all this effort was not necessary and my lap hand could blissfully go about its business without interruption.

    Additionally, since installing V2 my TiBook will not sleep without my express command. I'm not sure I can blame Ff for that.

    I reported this to the dev team via a comment system. If I recall correctly, the bug report system was too complicated (like the blog) and required too much effort (would have required both hands and keeping track of passwords--like I need more of those!).

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  114. I have to install it by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    The thing that bugs me with firefox on mac is that I have to install it.

    Seriously, my mac already came with a working browser; why do I have to install another one?

  115. Just one thing I want... by RedBear · · Score: 1

    There is only one thing I really want to see "fixed" in Firefox, and it's not really specific to the Mac platform. I honestly have never understood all this whining about Firefox not fitting in with other Mac applications, even before it got a lot better looking. I've been using it on Mac OS X for years with very few problems. That whole thing about native widgets on forms is something I really don't get. To me, the form widgets in Safari are icky, not the other way around.

    What I really want to see are some of the features of the "strongly unrecommended" Tabbrowser Extensions by Shimoda Hiroshi integrated into the next version of FF. As far as I'm concerned TBE is/was the best extension that has ever existed, and pushes FF from just being a decent browser to being amazingly useful for a power user at a level that no other web browser can approach. Most of the main features should have been integrated into FF by the FF developers years ago. The extensions that are usually recommended to replace TBE like Tab Mix Plus are a joke in comparison. There are various lengthy forum threads in various places where people have discussed ways of replicated some of the features of TBE, but it just can't be done. Laugh if you want but TBE has kept me using FF 1.5 to this day on my personal machine. Various features haven't quite worked 100% for a long time, but back when it was all working I had the following features and more, with cross-platform support for all of it:

    - Automatic grouping of related tabs
    - Automatic coloring of tab groups so I can tell them apart!
    - Automatically stays within the tab group by moving left when rightmost group tab is closed
    - All popups including javascript windows forced to open in new tab
    - Links to other sites automatically open in new background tab, same group
    - Automatic wrapping of too many tabs into multiple tab rows (broken on Mac, unf.)
    - Ability to save/bookmark tab groups and load entire groups in background tabs
    - "Close group" option to quickly and easily close a ton of related tabs (much faster than closing tabs individually)
    - Restriction of FF to using a single window no matter what (new window command disabled)
    - Automatic saving/restoring of the browser state including groupings and their colors
    - Drag & drop tab reordering
    - Automatic opening of bookmarks, new address bar URLs, history, almost everything in new background tabs (I absolutely hate it when I have to manually open a new tab in Safari or regular FF just to avoid overwriting the contents of the current tab)
    - Export/import of my TBE preferences between computers and platforms
    - Probably several more features that I can't remember right now

    Basically it gives me complete control of how my browser behaves and does everything in its power to help me stay organized and unconfused. It keeps the browser from making decisions on its own about when I'm done with a particular page or site. It keeps websites from being able to tell me when I should open a new window. I tell them when they're allowed to open a new window. Everything is forced into background tabs, even those idiotic javascript popup links that can't be opened in a tab the usual way. I don't lose pages just because I forgot to explicitly open a new tab before attempting to load a new URL or open a bookmark, it opens that new tab for me. It groups my sites clearly and logically in the same way that Mac OS X groups my applications clearly and logically. (OS X lets you stay within an application and cycle through all the open documents or windows in that application with Cmd+` [backtick/tilde key] instead of doing the Windows thing where you have to Alt+Tab between a bunch of unrelated application windows to get to things like Word documents that should be right next to each other. Alt+Tab on the Mac only cycles between applications. Together this makes task switching on the Mac immensely more efficient, IMNSHO.) TBE just makes things work the way they shoul

  116. Re:one simple: make sure that "home" & "end" w by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't do that because that's not what Home and End do on the Mac. They go to the beginning and end of an entire document, not just a line like on Windows (and Linux?). You want Cmd-Left and Cmd-Right.