Re 'With a few minor exceptions you have accurately described just about every US media outlet."
Thats really what the CIA, NSA, GCHQ, MI6, MI6, FBI would have to block from internet users commenting on in real time.
All comments on the news.
All art and cartoons created from the news.
Freedom of speech would be removed from the internet in real time.
Have to wait days into the news cycle while an account is proved to be on a list of approved nations to upload an approved funny political cartoon?
The cartoon would then be held and looked at by US and UK experts for any hint of a Russian art education to present US traditionalism to US internet users?
When the art work is proved by US art experts to be bland enough it will be allowed to be uploaded to the internet a week later.
Jokes about the news that get posted in real time without expert approval get a police visit.
Jokes that show advanced Russian level cultural awareness about US politics start investigations.
Applied knowledge and study of obscurity of US political history also allow FBI investigation of joke that is just too smart.
Russian anthropologist from closed science city must have helped US comedians craft extra funny joke about US candidate who cant give a long speech.
Yes so many public, private "security" partnerships now scan over every video, image.
Looking for checksums of data, filenames, data sets seen before. Adding a new checksum to all content not yet seen.
Add in machine ways to detect for patterns and content to find out what any new video, image could be about.
AC the sensitive data question got tested in the USA.
Pentagon Papers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
The main problem for people doing that kind of publication in the USA is they:
Once worked for the US gov, mil, as a contractor. They never get released from the security clearances and their publications get looked over by the US gov/mil before publication.
A person who works as an academic at a US university who enjoys a lot of US gov/mil funding and who has security clearances.
Who then wants to publish on topics they needed that security review for.
AC in the USA you are free to look at other books and content all over the USA and create a book on a topic you want. The history of US mil systems is fine to talk about.
HTTPS is what protects the content moving around the web to the brand.
So other brands don't get to see user data for free.
Once the brand has the content that crypto is what the brand offered.
Content then has to be sorted for ads that are going to make that user buy things.
Ads that have to understand what the content was.
Content is scanned for words and images so ads will be useful. Useful to the brands, on message for the user.
Such staffing rates and methods would fail in real time AC.
Lets look at rates given by another astroturfing campaign AC.
Operation Earnest Voice https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"50 user "operator" licenses, 10 sockpuppets controllable by each user"
Note the need for background, history and supporting details.
The need for a special secure VPN. Thats the vital trick only a government/mil can offer.
Private servers "based on the geographic area of operations" That needs other nations network support to not get caught.
One site in another distant nation is not going to give the in country cover needed AC.
Protection from virus, worm, or malicious software.
Much more is needed than just ten posts per shift from a part of the world AC.
So one app can support a lot of different ways of moving data.
Person to person with crypto.
To upload and let the world see.
P2P within a set community.
That gives the user the freedom of social media without having to be censored by one brand.
The good part is on other sites the video will stay up.
The video will not be removed by social media due to their support of one side of US party politics.
Freedom of speech and freedom after speech is needed to keep a video clip online.
Some brands can help with that.
A real company lets a user listen to their music.
A social media brands tracks the user and sells the data.
A real company makes a useful product a user can buy.
A social media company sells the users data as the product.
Been able to show in images from the news or articulate in a few lines that:
One candidate was giving great positive speeches to lots of real voters all over the USA.
Another candidate was talking to small numbers of the tame media on the east and west coast.
One candidate was able to give a speech that people in different states all over the USA enjoyed.
Another candidate spoke down to people all over the USA.
Subtle news topics that actual US voters like sharing.
To stop that US news from spreading facts about electability, health everything had to all be "Russia" accounts.
One candidate having a condescending way of talking about most of the USA was all from "fake" accounts.
Add in meme magic, cartoons, art, music, traditionalism that was trending from topics people could see in the news everyday.
One candidate was winning.
Another candidate was low energy. Thats was in contrast to an energetic candidate who could talk to real people all over the USA.
About jobs in the USA.
Voters all over the USA could see the differences and shared the news.
Voters turned out all over the USA to make the USA great again.
Low energy does not win over all the different states.
Coughing fits do not win elections.
Having nothing good to say about most parts of the USA will not get the needed votes in states all over the USA.
AC Nor was the USA mil and federal/state police on the east coast. Thats why the UK used the SAS a lot.
The flow of advanced weapon systems and support to Ireland stopped.
Every phone number and call in and out of Ireland was collected on. All international communications between Ireland to the USA.
Voice prints too when that was still an advanced science in real time.
UK collection was not just between the UK to Ireland but for all of Ireland. The USA was just another nation to track calls back to.
+1 for Usenet.
A good project would be to place a new GUI over a few of the more censorship resistant networks.
Bring Usenet, IRC, P2P, web cam, microphone support, crypto chat together as one GUI "app".
Each network supporting a wide range of different was of connecting with people. Person to person and for global communications.
No social media censorship and big brand politics.
The video can go on great sites like Vimeo, Bitchute.
Support sites that support freedom of speech.
A video clip that would have got supported on social media can find a lot of really great other sites.
Try forums on topics on interest.
Web sites and web pages.
Create your own forum, blog and web page.
Anything to get back to a diversity of sites that no one social media company can censor.
Enjoy the freedom of speech over the internet. Not just what one brand allows on their network.
The dark and cold is something most advance nations and cultures have worked hard to make better with electric power.
Working people pay part of their wage to ensure the power stays on.
Normal people in advanced nations don't want to return to the dark and cold for party political reasons.
The foreign owners are telling each other how they made the governments turn off power to working people.
The foreign owners have their own grassroots of fellow business owners they listen to and like to impress.
Making darkness and cold a new standard.
People in the USA want their lights to stay on and their jobs at night to be supported.
Their light, heating and cooling to work.
So the police and security services can get in and stay in.
Imagine if PRISM had to create a new login every day to get back into all the big US brands?
The easy way around that hard crypto work is to have an open front door, open back door, open trap door.
The US gov asked for plain text wide open network facing systems as the way it likes to collect on big US brands data.
Collect it all globally slows when every big network has to have real working crypto set up.
No new crypto and collect it all keeps collecting. No keys, shared keys, an open widow.
Its all part of what the government needs to keep the nations computers open to secure collection.
Secure networks stop the government from seeing what hackers are doing deep in networks.
Wide open networks allow the government to watch everyone using a network.
Slashdot Mirror
Re 'With a few minor exceptions you have accurately described just about every US media outlet."
Thats really what the CIA, NSA, GCHQ, MI6, MI6, FBI would have to block from internet users commenting on in real time.
All comments on the news.
All art and cartoons created from the news.
Freedom of speech would be removed from the internet in real time.
Have to wait days into the news cycle while an account is proved to be on a list of approved nations to upload an approved funny political cartoon?
The cartoon would then be held and looked at by US and UK experts for any hint of a Russian art education to present US traditionalism to US internet users?
When the art work is proved by US art experts to be bland enough it will be allowed to be uploaded to the internet a week later.
Jokes about the news that get posted in real time without expert approval get a police visit.
Jokes that show advanced Russian level cultural awareness about US politics start investigations.
Applied knowledge and study of obscurity of US political history also allow FBI investigation of joke that is just too smart.
Russian anthropologist from closed science city must have helped US comedians craft extra funny joke about US candidate who cant give a long speech.
Only every use Microsoft for computer games.
Yes so many public, private "security" partnerships now scan over every video, image.
Looking for checksums of data, filenames, data sets seen before. Adding a new checksum to all content not yet seen.
Add in machine ways to detect for patterns and content to find out what any new video, image could be about.
AC the sensitive data question got tested in the USA.
Pentagon Papers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
The main problem for people doing that kind of publication in the USA is they:
Once worked for the US gov, mil, as a contractor. They never get released from the security clearances and their publications get looked over by the US gov/mil before publication.
A person who works as an academic at a US university who enjoys a lot of US gov/mil funding and who has security clearances.
Who then wants to publish on topics they needed that security review for.
AC in the USA you are free to look at other books and content all over the USA and create a book on a topic you want. The history of US mil systems is fine to talk about.
Freedom of speech, freedom after speech AC.
--
Get all images and work backed up. Anything can change on social media sites for any reason.
Party politics, US laws.
HTTPS is what protects the content moving around the web to the brand.
So other brands don't get to see user data for free.
Once the brand has the content that crypto is what the brand offered.
Content then has to be sorted for ads that are going to make that user buy things.
Ads that have to understand what the content was.
Content is scanned for words and images so ads will be useful. Useful to the brands, on message for the user.
Such staffing rates and methods would fail in real time AC.
Lets look at rates given by another astroturfing campaign AC.
Operation Earnest Voice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"50 user "operator" licenses, 10 sockpuppets controllable by each user"
Note the need for background, history and supporting details.
The need for a special secure VPN. Thats the vital trick only a government/mil can offer.
Private servers "based on the geographic area of operations" That needs other nations network support to not get caught.
One site in another distant nation is not going to give the in country cover needed AC.
Protection from virus, worm, or malicious software.
Much more is needed than just ten posts per shift from a part of the world AC.
So one app can support a lot of different ways of moving data.
Person to person with crypto.
To upload and let the world see.
P2P within a set community.
That gives the user the freedom of social media without having to be censored by one brand.
The good part is on other sites the video will stay up.
The video will not be removed by social media due to their support of one side of US party politics.
Freedom of speech and freedom after speech is needed to keep a video clip online.
Some brands can help with that.
A real company lets a user listen to their music.
A social media brands tracks the user and sells the data.
A real company makes a useful product a user can buy.
A social media company sells the users data as the product.
Remember the US brands that got into PRISM and the dates.
Who was on the list early and who got added last.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Been able to show in images from the news or articulate in a few lines that:
One candidate was giving great positive speeches to lots of real voters all over the USA.
Another candidate was talking to small numbers of the tame media on the east and west coast.
One candidate was able to give a speech that people in different states all over the USA enjoyed.
Another candidate spoke down to people all over the USA.
Subtle news topics that actual US voters like sharing.
To stop that US news from spreading facts about electability, health everything had to all be "Russia" accounts.
One candidate having a condescending way of talking about most of the USA was all from "fake" accounts.
Add in meme magic, cartoons, art, music, traditionalism that was trending from topics people could see in the news everyday.
One candidate was winning.
Another candidate was low energy. Thats was in contrast to an energetic candidate who could talk to real people all over the USA.
About jobs in the USA.
Voters all over the USA could see the differences and shared the news.
Voters turned out all over the USA to make the USA great again.
Low energy does not win over all the different states.
Coughing fits do not win elections.
Having nothing good to say about most parts of the USA will not get the needed votes in states all over the USA.
The Western intelligence services fear 84 accounts?
Some university level meme magic and traditionalism reminded America it was always great?
AC Nor was the USA mil and federal/state police on the east coast. Thats why the UK used the SAS a lot.
The flow of advanced weapon systems and support to Ireland stopped.
Every phone number and call in and out of Ireland was collected on. All international communications between Ireland to the USA.
Voice prints too when that was still an advanced science in real time.
UK collection was not just between the UK to Ireland but for all of Ireland. The USA was just another nation to track calls back to.
The US in good faith went to work on an extradition treaty.
The US gov is going to remember how their treaty work got talked about by the UK.
When extradition failed the SAS prevailed.
Vimeo, Bitchute.
It was easy to share until a social media brands US party politics stopped the sharing.
The user always pays.
The users data sold in bulk via social media and ads.
Paying for their own services as they want.
+1 for Usenet.
A good project would be to place a new GUI over a few of the more censorship resistant networks.
Bring Usenet, IRC, P2P, web cam, microphone support, crypto chat together as one GUI "app".
Each network supporting a wide range of different was of connecting with people. Person to person and for global communications.
No social media censorship and big brand politics.
Make the internet great again.
--
The video can go on great sites like Vimeo, Bitchute.
Support sites that support freedom of speech.
A video clip that would have got supported on social media can find a lot of really great other sites.
Try forums on topics on interest.
Web sites and web pages.
Create your own forum, blog and web page.
Anything to get back to a diversity of sites that no one social media company can censor.
Enjoy the freedom of speech over the internet. Not just what one brand allows on their network.
The dark and cold is something most advance nations and cultures have worked hard to make better with electric power.
Working people pay part of their wage to ensure the power stays on.
Normal people in advanced nations don't want to return to the dark and cold for party political reasons.
The foreign owners are telling each other how they made the governments turn off power to working people.
The foreign owners have their own grassroots of fellow business owners they listen to and like to impress.
Making darkness and cold a new standard.
People in the USA want their lights to stay on and their jobs at night to be supported.
Their light, heating and cooling to work.
So the police and security services can get in and stay in.
Imagine if PRISM had to create a new login every day to get back into all the big US brands?
The easy way around that hard crypto work is to have an open front door, open back door, open trap door.
The US gov asked for plain text wide open network facing systems as the way it likes to collect on big US brands data.
Collect it all globally slows when every big network has to have real working crypto set up.
No new crypto and collect it all keeps collecting. No keys, shared keys, an open widow.
Its all part of what the government needs to keep the nations computers open to secure collection.
Secure networks stop the government from seeing what hackers are doing deep in networks.
Wide open networks allow the government to watch everyone using a network.