One that is as fast as your own network. One that is not in the EU, a nation wanting to join the EU, NATO or nation seeking to join NATO.
Too many banking and security treaties would make such locations open the UK requests on UK accounts, payments.
A router based VPN to protect the entire network and every device connected, all packets, no matter software, OS or hardware used.
A good VPN router that does not expose the ISP IP when a network drops.
The GCHQ does not seem too worried abut any commercial VPN brands and their crypto skills.
Any different networks that can really hold secure communications will be detected and have software or hardware altered until the communications is fully decoded.
Re That means the odds are that the brightest minds are NOT working for governments and ISPs.
Don't worry the UK security services now have take in a lot of really new staff thanks to party political policy.
UK security considerations or lack of ability will not be allowed to block any application to the UK security services.
Expect quotas to have to be filled by any applicants no matter the UK security risk.
Expect foreign security services to flood the UK with their trusted generations, some will make it in and move up the ranks.
It will be like the decades that saw a rapid influx of random new staff who had their applications considered on everything but actual UK security.
The 1930's or 1950's saw the rapid need for advanced math, crypto, languages. That allowed lot of really interesting new staff make it deep into the UK security services over the decades.
The new staff will be working for their own distant nations, faiths, cults and will be very busy reporting back as they advance up the UK ranks.
All the best gov staff will be trying to secure everything again for decades.
Expect a lot of log searches, computer intrusion (gov malware, input/password logging) to be fully push down automated as the best security service staff will be securing their own internal systems, decades of informants and networks from their own new teams.
What was once bespoke network entry will be staging servers spreading malware thats expected to log and report on most common US consumer OS brands.
The security services did that since 1910 with letters, telephone, faxes and all new emerging communications globally and within the UK over the years.
Now all the logs are open court ready.
Start using the internet for interesting things. Thats the only aspect of digital tracking the UK gov has not considered.
Create media in your local community, do interviews, take pictures, then push that local news back onto the net without vast amounts of IPS logs to go with any ISP account.
Remove any dates, serial numbers, data or gps in the files you create.
Use social media, web 2.0 on your terms to talk about national and local issues. How the UK is changing, how the internet is been tracked. What a VPN is and how it can be tracked. Junk cryptography and big brands in the UK.
Pack in jargon, keywords, search terms and spread it to any other sites, blogs, forums, web 2.0 portals.
i.e. lots of new accounts but only for pushing up data.
UK gov workers, SJW, volunteers, local gov, charities, NGO's can report the ip and look at the logs and just see vast amounts of local reporting. The UK can try to take down the media per site. Just keep spreading local news and take your UK supporters from site to site that still allows uploads.
If local gov, police ask for a chat down or try a more formal caution, that makes for a great local or national news story too:)
Enjoy the UK internet until photo ID is needed per web 2.0 account.
Then just buy into another nations web services and report back into the UK from a nation that supports freedom of speech and freedom after speech.
The more the UK gov tries to delist, ban, hide UK content and track its creators the more people in the UK will seek out interesting local media.
The articles I have seen don't mention the legality of VPNs?
Expect a big push in the UK to say VPN's are safe and the encryption works. That will move most interesting people on to VPN's.
They are legal as the GCHQ can log it all. Better to have interesting people rush out to get VPN's, feel safe and keep chatting, using forums, commenting, using their mic, webcam. Buying a VPN service with a UK CC is a great way to locate interesting people legally:)
The GCQH fears people who just stop using the net. All their expensive tracking is then just not much use and work has to be handed over to MI5, MI6 or police teams for 24/7 surveillance. Teams of about 9 people to watch one interesting person in shifts. With mass illegal immigration the UK has so many interesting people to track, its better to use computers, allow VPN's to be seen as still safe than the over time for police teams.
With the vast amounts of undocumented illegal migrants, a lot of new teams would need to be created.
Better to just allow VPN's and hope that most of the interesting people never work out the GCHQ logs it all.
Parallel construction would be used to hide the GCHQ VPN logging until open court police level VPN cooperation could be worked out.
Don't get a UK based VPN, don't get a VPN based in NATO nation or EU nations or nations wanting to join the EU/NATO as they will have banking and legal obligations to the UK gov/GCHQ/courts even after any changes to been in the EU.
A UK CC will show your payment to a VPN service.
Get a good router and a VPN service with the ability to use that hardware. Ensure that if the VPN stops or changes that the router stops the network. No settings that fall back to a ISP IP.
That will keep out most of the city and local gov, UK NGO/charity, public/private partnership tracking. The GCHQ will see it all and log as normal so don't be interesting online.
Years of logs kept at the ISP level. Then the data is searchable by city, national gov, GCHQ. Every term, word in any url that did not get good https.
The logs can then be used in open court as the method of collection is court friendly.
Every site by name or ip. Every comment, forum comment, use of social media. Reverse look up of any UK ip back to an ISP account, name, address, CC details.
Any comment about any location in the UK, politics, been anti war, wanting union support, reporting on news about local gov or MPs' expenses, the role of celebrities in politics, mass illegal migration, hospital funding.. looking up work health and safety issues at home.. looking for legal advice in your local area, looking up any medical conditions and insurance.
The FBI can track onion routing with a per case budget. So the UK can do the same. Onion routing as safe as your ISP in any UK or US open court..
The GCHQ can see a VPN user so allowing a VPN is just a better way of seeing who is interesting.
As VPN's are not banned or banned from using UK banking services, the GCHQ tracking must work as expected.
The good news is a good VPN with router will stop most of the city, gov backed NGO, charity partnership level tracking.
Think of the clean up overtime.
Hours, days, weeks, months of trying to find and remove every last trace of deep system alterations.
If anyone asks about the clean up budget, mention its complex, has a foreign aspect thats under investigation, and has the US gov interested.
Even "standard ransomware" might have some international code in it...
Re "but it is very reasonable to have the entire system on its own VPN with NO other ports open."
The idea of all this remote automation was to remove the need for layers of staff at every location.
A few skilled engineers can keep a networked system working all day with another set of workers for repairs.
If too many new staff are hired to watch computers or run the network when the computers fail they might unionise.
Think of all the wages and over time, extra pay and holidays that will have to be covered for local staff.
Just let some contractors in to clean up the computers and it'd all good again.
The contractors can even network in from different states or other cities to fix issues, thats how well designed the network are....
A SJW totally removes a site from their brands search results.
Then contacts other SJW teams at a few archive sites to remove any other versions that might have been kept over the years.
Then alters the search position of any site that linked to the now delisted site.
Got to make sure the memory hole https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... is proactive for any linked sites. What about.edu sites that used the site in publications?
What if the site is mentioned in an academic setting or quoted in parts? A search might still find some trace that site.
Contact SJW teams on campus to correct the digital results.
A printed version might still quote from the site... have physical texts quoting the site that can no longer be found removed from the library or department.
With digital access to a few key search sites and archives a SJW team could really make the internet into a huge safe space.
Then work to remove the sites that linked to the original site or within that site.
Warn authors and publishers never to mention the site or get removed and banned as an author and publisher.
A search engine that has vast numbers of SJW staff removing sites, books, authors, publishers vs their own teams trying to search the web?
How long will it take for a real search engine brand that actually finds all results on the net to start trending?
How to brand a safe space search engine with no ability to search the net?
Will the SJW in the west try a ranking system within their own brand?
China 'social credit': Beijing sets up huge system (26 October 2015) http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...
If a SJW does not like a site and they delist it could they get some reward points?
The more sites they report and ban the more glorious and exclusive the company rewards for heroic efforts?
Some sort of GUI to track their reward points?
Modern art was CIA 'weapon' (22 October 1995) http://www.independent.co.uk/n...
"... set up a division, the Propaganda Assets Inventory, which at its peak could influence more than 800 newspapers, magazines and public information organisations. "
Its interesting reading about the past of many US projects with terms like:
"Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media" (Friday 18 March 2011) https://www.theguardian.com/te...
"... none of the interventions would be in English, as it would be unlawful to "address US audiences" with such technology"
"The CIA and the media" gives some context to what the US was doing globally. http://carlbernstein.com/magaz...
The internet is about finding news, sites, forums, chats, people, fun, enjoying social media or adding a comment.
If a user does not like a site, don't use it, dont return to it. Making it not easy to search for results or delisting terms won't change reality.
If the site is in the USA, having freedom of speech is protected. Having freedom after speech is protected from gov staff.
Freedom from a gov or mil, a political party or theocracy or cult is what sets the USA apart from the rest of the world.
If a company does or does not want to host material, find results or comments, thats ok too.
Just make it clear that your products or services are not going to get good results as teams have restricted all expected functionality.
Users then have the freedom to start their own sites or select from much better competing services that have embraced freedom.
Freedom does not go away after one company bans it. Freedom and fun then moves to better sites who support free speech.
If a brand wants to support SJW, governments, theocracies, cults, contractors and be a huge safe space thats their option.
In a free market of ideas and so many other great brands supporting freedom of speech to become a very boring brand is not really the best marketing position.
Censorship as branding might be great for some faiths or nations but freedom sells globally.
Recalls the old Microsoft Chrome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... projects:)
"Throughout its brief lifespan, the product was widely derided as an example of Microsoft's embrace, extend and extinguish strategy of ruining standards efforts by adding options that only ran on their platforms."
Down the list AC: http://time.com/4472169/russia...
" did not say whether the hackers were working for the Russian government" http://time.com/4471042/fbi-vo...
"It's unclear who targeted the databases"
"Cyber Division did not identify the intruders or the two states targeted"
Every file could get realtime scans with networked checksums. So don't have any files of interest to any NGO, gov, charity, mil or the private sector on any Windows computer.
AC what did the "NSA and CIA already confirmed that"?
The US gov said it saw that someone in the private sector found old BEAR code that anyone could be using and that a few very different groups accessed very different US networks. Groups using old code that was well understood to be in public hands and that contractors told the media about.
As for this topic AC, the US navy issues?
"compromised" is about the best world to use. No mention of nations or methods AC.."early stages of investigating "...
Not the usual rapid contractor rush out to tell the waiting media about code litter AC.
The question is then was the data unencrypted and why was it facing the internet? Why does the US gov and mil have data facing the intent thats often easy to find and then read?
Thats the idea. Spend all the cash on designing a reactor, building the site. The reactor vessel has to be perfect, all the skills and expensive staff on site. Then keep the reactor running at a profit. Finally removing all the radioactive parts and returning the clean site.
That cost will be reduced with a lot of robots. Robots in trucks at the mines to get the coal to the rail network. Robots to load rail, unload at the port. Robots will reduce costs on ships. Robots to unload the coal and get it to the power plant. Only a few engineers will be at the mine on the ship and power plant.
Robots will make coal an export winner.
Robots will need repair work, but thats much less staff moving around many sites.
Think of the reduced costs, no unions, less wages, no political leaders demanding local mine, rail, port jobs. Coal been exported by robots 24/7 and new profits.
Slashdot Mirror
Have to register the camera too and only fly with a camera at a US gov or state sanctioned race or drone photography event.
One that is as fast as your own network. One that is not in the EU, a nation wanting to join the EU, NATO or nation seeking to join NATO.
Too many banking and security treaties would make such locations open the UK requests on UK accounts, payments.
A router based VPN to protect the entire network and every device connected, all packets, no matter software, OS or hardware used.
A good VPN router that does not expose the ISP IP when a network drops.
The GCHQ does not seem too worried abut any commercial VPN brands and their crypto skills.
Any different networks that can really hold secure communications will be detected and have software or hardware altered until the communications is fully decoded.
Re That means the odds are that the brightest minds are NOT working for governments and ISPs.
Don't worry the UK security services now have take in a lot of really new staff thanks to party political policy.
UK security considerations or lack of ability will not be allowed to block any application to the UK security services.
Expect quotas to have to be filled by any applicants no matter the UK security risk.
Expect foreign security services to flood the UK with their trusted generations, some will make it in and move up the ranks.
It will be like the decades that saw a rapid influx of random new staff who had their applications considered on everything but actual UK security.
The 1930's or 1950's saw the rapid need for advanced math, crypto, languages. That allowed lot of really interesting new staff make it deep into the UK security services over the decades.
The new staff will be working for their own distant nations, faiths, cults and will be very busy reporting back as they advance up the UK ranks.
All the best gov staff will be trying to secure everything again for decades.
Expect a lot of log searches, computer intrusion (gov malware, input/password logging) to be fully push down automated as the best security service staff will be securing their own internal systems, decades of informants and networks from their own new teams.
What was once bespoke network entry will be staging servers spreading malware thats expected to log and report on most common US consumer OS brands.
The security services did that since 1910 with letters, telephone, faxes and all new emerging communications globally and within the UK over the years.
Now all the logs are open court ready.
Start using the internet for interesting things. Thats the only aspect of digital tracking the UK gov has not considered. :)
Create media in your local community, do interviews, take pictures, then push that local news back onto the net without vast amounts of IPS logs to go with any ISP account.
Remove any dates, serial numbers, data or gps in the files you create.
Use social media, web 2.0 on your terms to talk about national and local issues. How the UK is changing, how the internet is been tracked. What a VPN is and how it can be tracked. Junk cryptography and big brands in the UK.
Pack in jargon, keywords, search terms and spread it to any other sites, blogs, forums, web 2.0 portals.
i.e. lots of new accounts but only for pushing up data.
UK gov workers, SJW, volunteers, local gov, charities, NGO's can report the ip and look at the logs and just see vast amounts of local reporting. The UK can try to take down the media per site. Just keep spreading local news and take your UK supporters from site to site that still allows uploads.
If local gov, police ask for a chat down or try a more formal caution, that makes for a great local or national news story too
Enjoy the UK internet until photo ID is needed per web 2.0 account.
Then just buy into another nations web services and report back into the UK from a nation that supports freedom of speech and freedom after speech.
The more the UK gov tries to delist, ban, hide UK content and track its creators the more people in the UK will seek out interesting local media.
The articles I have seen don't mention the legality of VPNs? :)
Expect a big push in the UK to say VPN's are safe and the encryption works. That will move most interesting people on to VPN's.
They are legal as the GCHQ can log it all. Better to have interesting people rush out to get VPN's, feel safe and keep chatting, using forums, commenting, using their mic, webcam. Buying a VPN service with a UK CC is a great way to locate interesting people legally
The GCQH fears people who just stop using the net. All their expensive tracking is then just not much use and work has to be handed over to MI5, MI6 or police teams for 24/7 surveillance.
Teams of about 9 people to watch one interesting person in shifts. With mass illegal immigration the UK has so many interesting people to track, its better to use computers, allow VPN's to be seen as still safe than the over time for police teams.
With the vast amounts of undocumented illegal migrants, a lot of new teams would need to be created.
Better to just allow VPN's and hope that most of the interesting people never work out the GCHQ logs it all.
Parallel construction would be used to hide the GCHQ VPN logging until open court police level VPN cooperation could be worked out.
Don't get a UK based VPN, don't get a VPN based in NATO nation or EU nations or nations wanting to join the EU/NATO as they will have banking and legal obligations to the UK gov/GCHQ/courts even after any changes to been in the EU.
A UK CC will show your payment to a VPN service.
Get a good router and a VPN service with the ability to use that hardware. Ensure that if the VPN stops or changes that the router stops the network. No settings that fall back to a ISP IP. That will keep out most of the city and local gov, UK NGO/charity, public/private partnership tracking. The GCHQ will see it all and log as normal so don't be interesting online.
Years of logs kept at the ISP level. Then the data is searchable by city, national gov, GCHQ. Every term, word in any url that did not get good https.
The logs can then be used in open court as the method of collection is court friendly.
Every site by name or ip. Every comment, forum comment, use of social media. Reverse look up of any UK ip back to an ISP account, name, address, CC details.
Any comment about any location in the UK, politics, been anti war, wanting union support, reporting on news about local gov or MPs' expenses, the role of celebrities in politics, mass illegal migration, hospital funding.. looking up work health and safety issues at home.. looking for legal advice in your local area, looking up any medical conditions and insurance.
The FBI can track onion routing with a per case budget. So the UK can do the same. Onion routing as safe as your ISP in any UK or US open court..
The GCHQ can see a VPN user so allowing a VPN is just a better way of seeing who is interesting.
As VPN's are not banned or banned from using UK banking services, the GCHQ tracking must work as expected.
The good news is a good VPN with router will stop most of the city, gov backed NGO, charity partnership level tracking.
The Australian list is very like the UK list:
"61 agencies apply for metadata access" (18/01/2016)
https://delimiter.com.au/2016/...
A brand that cannot trust its own own staff .... or a brand that cant secure its own tools ...
Think of the clean up overtime.
Hours, days, weeks, months of trying to find and remove every last trace of deep system alterations.
If anyone asks about the clean up budget, mention its complex, has a foreign aspect thats under investigation, and has the US gov interested.
Even "standard ransomware" might have some international code in it...
Re "but it is very reasonable to have the entire system on its own VPN with NO other ports open."
The idea of all this remote automation was to remove the need for layers of staff at every location.
A few skilled engineers can keep a networked system working all day with another set of workers for repairs.
If too many new staff are hired to watch computers or run the network when the computers fail they might unionise.
Think of all the wages and over time, extra pay and holidays that will have to be covered for local staff.
Just let some contractors in to clean up the computers and it'd all good again.
The contractors can even network in from different states or other cities to fix issues, thats how well designed the network are....
A SJW totally removes a site from their brands search results. .edu sites that used the site in publications?
Then contacts other SJW teams at a few archive sites to remove any other versions that might have been kept over the years.
Then alters the search position of any site that linked to the now delisted site.
Got to make sure the memory hole https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... is proactive for any linked sites. What about
What if the site is mentioned in an academic setting or quoted in parts? A search might still find some trace that site.
Contact SJW teams on campus to correct the digital results.
A printed version might still quote from the site... have physical texts quoting the site that can no longer be found removed from the library or department.
With digital access to a few key search sites and archives a SJW team could really make the internet into a huge safe space.
Then work to remove the sites that linked to the original site or within that site.
Warn authors and publishers never to mention the site or get removed and banned as an author and publisher.
A search engine that has vast numbers of SJW staff removing sites, books, authors, publishers vs their own teams trying to search the web?
How long will it take for a real search engine brand that actually finds all results on the net to start trending?
How to brand a safe space search engine with no ability to search the net?
Will the SJW in the west try a ranking system within their own brand?
China 'social credit': Beijing sets up huge system (26 October 2015)
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...
If a SJW does not like a site and they delist it could they get some reward points?
The more sites they report and ban the more glorious and exclusive the company rewards for heroic efforts?
Some sort of GUI to track their reward points?
Modern art was CIA 'weapon' (22 October 1995)
http://www.independent.co.uk/n...
"... set up a division, the Propaganda Assets Inventory, which at its peak could influence more than 800 newspapers, magazines and public information organisations. "
Its interesting reading about the past of many US projects with terms like:
"Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media" (Friday 18 March 2011)
https://www.theguardian.com/te...
"... none of the interventions would be in English, as it would be unlawful to "address US audiences" with such technology"
"The CIA and the media" gives some context to what the US was doing globally.
http://carlbernstein.com/magaz...
The internet is about finding news, sites, forums, chats, people, fun, enjoying social media or adding a comment.
If a user does not like a site, don't use it, dont return to it. Making it not easy to search for results or delisting terms won't change reality.
If the site is in the USA, having freedom of speech is protected. Having freedom after speech is protected from gov staff.
Freedom from a gov or mil, a political party or theocracy or cult is what sets the USA apart from the rest of the world.
If a company does or does not want to host material, find results or comments, thats ok too.
Just make it clear that your products or services are not going to get good results as teams have restricted all expected functionality.
Users then have the freedom to start their own sites or select from much better competing services that have embraced freedom.
Freedom does not go away after one company bans it. Freedom and fun then moves to better sites who support free speech.
If a brand wants to support SJW, governments, theocracies, cults, contractors and be a huge safe space thats their option.
In a free market of ideas and so many other great brands supporting freedom of speech to become a very boring brand is not really the best marketing position.
Censorship as branding might be great for some faiths or nations but freedom sells globally.
Recalls the old Microsoft Chrome https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... projects :)
"Throughout its brief lifespan, the product was widely derided as an example of Microsoft's embrace, extend and extinguish strategy of ruining standards efforts by adding options that only ran on their platforms."
Down the list AC:
http://time.com/4472169/russia...
" did not say whether the hackers were working for the Russian government"
http://time.com/4471042/fbi-vo...
"It's unclear who targeted the databases"
"Cyber Division did not identify the intruders or the two states targeted"
Please come back to our paper and subscribe. Enjoy safe news.
Every file could get realtime scans with networked checksums. So don't have any files of interest to any NGO, gov, charity, mil or the private sector on any Windows computer.
AC what did the "NSA and CIA already confirmed that"?
The US gov said it saw that someone in the private sector found old BEAR code that anyone could be using and that a few very different groups accessed very different US networks. Groups using old code that was well understood to be in public hands and that contractors told the media about.
As for this topic AC, the US navy issues?
"compromised" is about the best world to use. No mention of nations or methods AC.."early stages of investigating "...
Not the usual rapid contractor rush out to tell the waiting media about code litter AC.
The question is then was the data unencrypted and why was it facing the internet? Why does the US gov and mil have data facing the intent thats often easy to find and then read?
Thats the idea. Spend all the cash on designing a reactor, building the site. The reactor vessel has to be perfect, all the skills and expensive staff on site. Then keep the reactor running at a profit. Finally removing all the radioactive parts and returning the clean site.
That cost will be reduced with a lot of robots. Robots in trucks at the mines to get the coal to the rail network. Robots to load rail, unload at the port. Robots will reduce costs on ships. Robots to unload the coal and get it to the power plant. Only a few engineers will be at the mine on the ship and power plant.
Robots will make coal an export winner.
Robots will need repair work, but thats much less staff moving around many sites.
Think of the reduced costs, no unions, less wages, no political leaders demanding local mine, rail, port jobs. Coal been exported by robots 24/7 and new profits.