Slashdot Mirror


User: Bane1998

Bane1998's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
57
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 57

  1. Uhm... this is called a vulnerability in browsers? on Major Browsers Have JS Pop-Up Flaw · · Score: 1

    Now, wait a minute. Isn't this just sensationalism? To me, a vulnerability is an buffer overflow, or something real. This is just generally bad design. Essentially, they are saying a window that doesn't show where it is from is a vulnerability in browser software? In that case, nearly every windowing system (Windows, X, Aqua, etc) have this 'vulnerability'. It's not hard to pop up a window that on the surface appears to be part of another app.

    So again, explain to me how this is a vulnerability. I think MS said it right when they said:

    Microsoft has said it is investigating Secunia's claims. It encouraged surfers not to trust pop-up windows that don't include an address bar or a lock icon that verifies that it came from a certified source.

    So, even if this is a vulnerability that merits a software change in browsers... which I don't believe is the case... The only real solution is annoying text/windows/popups telling the user 'This window was popped up by Frame7, beware'. Which, they will ignore anyway. Look at the history. Users just hit OK.

    With stories like this, I could call myself a security firm and publish vulnerabilities like this every hour on the hour. Then I too, could write scary papers that put fear into the masses for no reason.

    1. Induce fear
    2. Sell feel-good 'solution'
    3. PROFIT!

    Wow, sounds like the United States.

    Keith

  2. Re:Quadruple independent redundancy. on Rats 'Cripple' NZ Web Access · · Score: 1

    I feel so misunderstood... -sob-

  3. Re:Quadruple independent redundancy. on Rats 'Cripple' NZ Web Access · · Score: 5, Funny

    I keep telling this to my fiance. I need at least four prostitutes to back her up. I don't know what bothers her more, the idea of being 'backed up' or being 'redundant'.

  4. Yeah, but.... on Looking at FreeBSD 6 and Beyond · · Score: 1

    This is Slashdot.... what does this have to do with Linux? :P

  5. Re:Aww, cut the crap on Microsoft Cuts Anti-Virus Support For Unix / Linux · · Score: 1

    Ok, so I'm new to slashdot, I see this was a reply not to me but this other guy. Threshold and threading got me all confuzzled. Keith

  6. Re:Aww, cut the crap on Microsoft Cuts Anti-Virus Support For Unix / Linux · · Score: 1

    Uhm. Ok. What does this have to do with anything?

    From your link:

    The Morris worm worked by exploiting known vulnerabilities in Unix sendmail, fingerd, rsh/rexec and weak passwords.

    Still doesn't sound like Linux gets no viruses. :P

    Keith

  7. Aww, cut the crap on Microsoft Cuts Anti-Virus Support For Unix / Linux · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry, folks. Saying *nix doesn't have viruses is just fan-boy. Believing it is ignorant. As a matter of fact, I run Windows and Linux. Windows does tend to get more, simply because it has more market share. However, I can say that the only virus/worm I've ever gotten that DESTROYED important data was on Linux. God damned phpBB worm that replaces *.html among other things.

    Anyway, such generalizations are foolish anyway, since it's usually not the OPERATING SYSTEM level software getting the virus/worms. It's some badly written service.

    Anyway... you get the point. But please, stop being slashdot zombies and claiming Linux is perfect.

    Keith