I read TFA too and modded the author troll. I am an experienced ID security professional and the article title does not match its content. I don't know how this got on slash dot but whatever your smoken up thier, pass it down here.
I expected to see an article on server side deployment level activities Ms vs Linux, not some LDAP Noobie articles. This was a joke.
In my professional opinion the whole thread should be nukes as it's premise was a lie.
Listen in all towns and cultures all over the world their is usually some one who collects news, they write a journal, sort of a blog of what is heard by them.
The Wayback machine is the journal of the historians who run it.
It would be sad and pathetic if the courts rule that revisionists rule the day. No one will understand the past if they don't have history and journals to guide them.
As an example, people don't even understand the concept of privacy today like they did 15 years ago.
If you let them take away history you might as well BURN all the books with this ruling.
This is such a BAD case and It behooves all of us to reflect on this. Remember how many books, bibles and personal journals were burned by Hitler? This IS tantamount to burning history books or the bible to exterminate a truth that some one held. We don't have any right to eliminate free speech in the past any more then we do in the present by shooting some one.
I think the plaintiff needs to understand this unless they want national comparisons in the news with other book burner revisionists.
Hey, (Observation) Notice how neither the description nor the linked pages in the list you attached used the descriptors "Crash", or "hang" nor no negative security connotation at all. If these are security updates why are the details missing why is it dumbed down? Why don't they say the truth?
Like, "An unchecked buffer in feature XYZ, allows remote unauthenticated access as root resulting in the un audited compromise of the system".
This would be closer to the weak yet more accurate Microsoft descriptions.
I don't believe the average Linux user is any more a security professional or security literate than the average Microsoft user.
I would be curious all things being equal, how long todays patches will take to completely saturate the base of patchable machines.
Including all of thousands of machines based on odd ball linux distros and all windows machines. Not the time to make the patch, but the time it takes for the vulnerability to be reasonably remediated.
Slashdot Mirror
Promise: My next machine will be my first Mac purchase.
It must hoever use a non Intel CPU and be no more than 35% populated with Intel chips.
I am dead serious. I hope AMD is a choice.
--
Intel is the evil empire your momma warned you about.
Well done layer 3 audio guru's
Where do I send the Keg of soda and beer?
Assuming you will not share with anyone user 21.
Whats the drinking age your country.
Have a party. CONGRATS
Well done.
I hope this guy gets a firewall some time soon.
\\127.63.24.12\C$ is wide open lots of file.
Id be suprised if some one dosen't hack this sad linux distro before the end of the day.
sad.
rofl, sorry dude hehehehhe lol
I read TFA too and modded the author troll.
I am an experienced ID security professional and the article title does not match its content.
I don't know how this got on slash dot but whatever your smoken up thier, pass it down here.
I expected to see an article on server side deployment level activities Ms vs Linux, not some LDAP Noobie articles. This was a joke.
In my professional opinion the whole thread should be nukes as it's premise was a lie.
I previously got his ip, its is. 127.63.24.12 Have a nice day.
No one has it right so far,
Listen in all towns and cultures all over the world their is usually some one who collects news, they write a journal, sort of a blog of what is heard by them.
The Wayback machine is the journal of the historians who run it.
It would be sad and pathetic if the courts rule that revisionists rule the day. No one will understand the past if they don't have history and journals to guide them.
As an example, people don't even understand the concept of privacy today like they did 15 years ago.
If you let them take away history you might as well BURN all the books with this ruling.
This is such a BAD case and It behooves all of us to reflect on this.
Remember how many books, bibles and personal journals were burned by Hitler?
This IS tantamount to burning history books or the bible to exterminate a truth that some one held.
We don't have any right to eliminate free speech in the past any more then we do in the present by shooting some one.
I think the plaintiff needs to understand this unless they want national comparisons in the news with other book burner revisionists.
Clarity re-established. Thanks Adam!
Hey, (Observation)
Notice how neither the description nor the linked pages in the list you attached used the descriptors "Crash", or "hang" nor no negative security connotation at all.
If these are security updates why are the details missing why is it dumbed down? Why don't they say the truth?
Like, "An unchecked buffer in feature XYZ, allows remote unauthenticated access as root resulting in the un audited compromise of the system".
This would be closer to the weak yet more accurate Microsoft descriptions.
I don't believe the average Linux user is any more a security professional or security literate than the average Microsoft user.
I would be curious all things being equal, how long todays patches will take to completely saturate the base of patchable machines.
Including all of thousands of machines based on odd ball linux distros and all windows machines.
Not the time to make the patch, but the time it takes for the vulnerability to be reasonably remediated.
Any one know?