... That the CEO of a software company can't even type, and furthermore gets the pathetic idea of wanting to use his influence to drag us all down with him. I use the caps lock key all the time, for proper reasons that is. If this crazy proposal is to be accepted I really don't know what to do.:(
First of all, you're absolutely right about your definition of geniuses.
I think that Einstein was soon to be forgotten when quantum mechanics was defined, primarily because of his attitude towards this whole new problem. Niels Bohr said that the particles properties was to be set when you measure it, but Einstein was far more pessimistic towards this answer. He, like myself, wanted to solve the whole problem at once instead of guessing like Schrödinger and Bohr partly did.
I actually think it is sad that modern physics is so hard to understand - quantum theory is against everything which is of my point of view logically plausible, the theory of relativity for instance is way more fascinating than something threatening all the physics that we know (or believe?). Einstein also said that if this Copenhagen interpretation is to be true, he would rather work in a casino than being a physicist. I think that indecates just how much passion this poor old man felt all for classic science along to the end.
Sorry, off-topic, but there are just way too many arm chair physicists around here..
I never called myself a physicist.:-) Besides, I only use the term "Chaos Theory" to indicate a theory containing all particles/waves in the space and the forces of nature between them.
I indeed think that "free will" is just an illusion. Every action that one man makes is based on several estimations and cognitive thoughts, based on events experienced before in life and of course the person's personality. The brain's thoughts can be predicted as well as everything else, if the information of what ever it and it's body is made of and what the brain experienced earlier in life is known. Not to mention the one practically problem that we do not have enough power of calculation. There is nothing random in animals (including humans) decisions.
But maybe you're right about Chaos Theory, I actually didn't know that this kind of thinking wasn't a part of it.:)
I wonder if computers of the future can calculate the correct answer, by looking at the present now and the future then, and thereby go even farther back than the present now, recursively.
Besides, I can't stop wonder if computers of the future will be powerful enough to predict the future further on, as a part of the chaos theory; Every little particle must be taken into consideration - not to mention the forces between them. It's interesting that every single event is an explicit direct consequence of the Big Bang.
Even that I'm writing this comment is a direct consequence of the Big Bang that theoretically could have been predicted...
The problem is not whether JavaScript should be accepted or not, but rather how can we improve the browsers and the feed readers. The readers for the first instance should not be parsing JavaScript at all, problem solved there. But even more important; browsers should not be able to parse malicious JS code. If only the browsers and the client side would be mended not not to parse evil JavaScript these kind of news would never appear again.:-)
I think it's important to keep the XML HTTP Request (or AJAX if you want) seperated from explicit changing topic or direction. Someone above me said that "you never have to see your page refreshing again". I think XHR should be enclosed to only where it really belongs and would be very neat - for instance in the slashdot comment system or just comment systems in all general; Not to change the subject all over.
If XHR's not being overdone, you ensure that links still works, later on you can separate the overall content on different topics and so on. Browsing the web should be preserved for refreshing.
In my opinion, caching is not a good idea unless the website is very big (like Slashdot or Digg). Constructive coding is to replace the caching systems, which is just another layer on the request.
And by the way, another tip, if the coder necessarily has to use PHP - try organizing the functions using OOP. In the end the bad organizing on the website staggers the coder because of the confusing construction.
Me myself is also in the lead of serveradministration, scripting, programming and databaseadministration of several websites and webservers online. I experienced as well in the beginning how my Windows servers chrashed down several times, due to bad and rookieaffected configuration. Then I decided to switch to Linux Gentoo and learned lots of stuff about how to increase the performance. I'm very glad that i threw myself into the hell of crashes because of all the lessons i received by trying to fix it.
Slashdot Mirror
... That the CEO of a software company can't even type, and furthermore gets the pathetic idea of wanting to use his influence to drag us all down with him. I use the caps lock key all the time, for proper reasons that is. If this crazy proposal is to be accepted I really don't know what to do. :(
First of all, you're absolutely right about your definition of geniuses.
I think that Einstein was soon to be forgotten when quantum mechanics was defined, primarily because of his attitude towards this whole new problem. Niels Bohr said that the particles properties was to be set when you measure it, but Einstein was far more pessimistic towards this answer. He, like myself, wanted to solve the whole problem at once instead of guessing like Schrödinger and Bohr partly did.
I actually think it is sad that modern physics is so hard to understand - quantum theory is against everything which is of my point of view logically plausible, the theory of relativity for instance is way more fascinating than something threatening all the physics that we know (or believe?). Einstein also said that if this Copenhagen interpretation is to be true, he would rather work in a casino than being a physicist. I think that indecates just how much passion this poor old man felt all for classic science along to the end.
I indeed think that "free will" is just an illusion. Every action that one man makes is based on several estimations and cognitive thoughts, based on events experienced before in life and of course the person's personality. The brain's thoughts can be predicted as well as everything else, if the information of what ever it and it's body is made of and what the brain experienced earlier in life is known. Not to mention the one practically problem that we do not have enough power of calculation. There is nothing random in animals (including humans) decisions.
:)
But maybe you're right about Chaos Theory, I actually didn't know that this kind of thinking wasn't a part of it.
I wonder if computers of the future can calculate the correct answer, by looking at the present now and the future then, and thereby go even farther back than the present now, recursively.
Besides, I can't stop wonder if computers of the future will be powerful enough to predict the future further on, as a part of the chaos theory; Every little particle must be taken into consideration - not to mention the forces between them. It's interesting that every single event is an explicit direct consequence of the Big Bang.
Even that I'm writing this comment is a direct consequence of the Big Bang that theoretically could have been predicted...
I understand why you chose to post anonymous not to mention "Off Topic". :p
The problem is not whether JavaScript should be accepted or not, but rather how can we improve the browsers and the feed readers. The readers for the first instance should not be parsing JavaScript at all, problem solved there. But even more important; browsers should not be able to parse malicious JS code. If only the browsers and the client side would be mended not not to parse evil JavaScript these kind of news would never appear again. :-)
I think it's important to keep the XML HTTP Request (or AJAX if you want) seperated from explicit changing topic or direction. Someone above me said that "you never have to see your page refreshing again". I think XHR should be enclosed to only where it really belongs and would be very neat - for instance in the slashdot comment system or just comment systems in all general; Not to change the subject all over.
If XHR's not being overdone, you ensure that links still works, later on you can separate the overall content on different topics and so on. Browsing the web should be preserved for refreshing.
In my opinion, caching is not a good idea unless the website is very big (like Slashdot or Digg). Constructive coding is to replace the caching systems, which is just another layer on the request.
And by the way, another tip, if the coder necessarily has to use PHP - try organizing the functions using OOP. In the end the bad organizing on the website staggers the coder because of the confusing construction.
Me myself is also in the lead of serveradministration, scripting, programming and databaseadministration of several websites and webservers online. I experienced as well in the beginning how my Windows servers chrashed down several times, due to bad and rookieaffected configuration. Then I decided to switch to Linux Gentoo and learned lots of stuff about how to increase the performance. I'm very glad that i threw myself into the hell of crashes because of all the lessons i received by trying to fix it.
:D
Google sure become a good friend of mine.
Why must you unveil our secret plans?!?!?!?!?!?
It looks pretty cute'n normal imo. :D