"Wait until the government can get warrantless wiretaps on the logs of those things."
Yeah, it'd go something like this:
*left* *left* *up* *right* *down* *down* *up*
"Oh my lord, Johnson, he must be planning an attack! Scramble some F-16s and get a trace on the IP address of that Nintendo -- we've got to stop this guy before he hurts someone!"
--or--
*left* *left* *up* *right* *down* *down* *up*
"Hmmm... I think he's trying to get the 'Balls of Steel' cheat to activate. That's an arresting, Johnson, send the local authorities over his way. Kids these days think they can cheat their way through pinball. Disgusting."
sounds like a case where, god forbid, natural childbirth could occur.
your weak argument might have had some substance in the case that you said "there is an affliction killing a large number of people and you are piloting a vehicle that contains the only cure to said affliction when the vehicle begins to overheat" -- but, in order to be consistent with reality, you'd have to append "and this vehicle is powered by a nuclear reactor, and, when cooling is lacking in a nuclear reactor, the reaction has the potential to speed up uncontrollably, causing a larger problem than the lack of the delivery of the medicine, which is destroyed as the vehicle melts down anyway."
if cutting corners on this safety concern causes a problem, the people who need the isotopes are screwed because the isotopes cannot be created if the plant is leveled (worst case) or more damage is caused taking the plant out of commission for an even longer period of time (best case). on the other hand, the engineers who say this is a safety concern could be completely wrong and their heads up their asses, but since we're talking about politicians disagreeing with the engineers, i believe the rectal cranial inversion in question should be attributed to the other side.
luckily, the liberals are looking for a guarantee that ignoring the advice of the Nuclear Safety Commission is safe before they sign.
the world is overpopulated, our growth is not sustainable (chuckle). i guess the scythe will come down either way, be it lack of energy to power our cities, lack of medical nuclear isotopes to save our dying, or fallout because we cut corners on safety concerns. we're fucking with an amazingly powerful thing, this is not sheetrock & roofing, this is not an oil change, this is not even an annual inspection on an airplane -- this is a safety concern with a nuclear reactor.
people who cut corners kill more people than a lack of radio isotopes -- you can quote Anonymous Coward on that one.
Working at a University, this is not a subject I'm not unfamiliar with.
Hmm... If something IS a subject that you are NOT UNfamiliar with, then it IS a subject that are ARE familiar with. Therefore, if something is NOT a subject that you are NOT UNfamiliar with, then it is a subject that you are NOT familiar with. In which case, why would one respect your opinion on the subject? You mention you work at a university... Are you the janitor?;)
Tons of great shit, sustained grape-produced plasma, soap, peeps, many CDs -- all filmed in microwave and put to Bloodhound Gang's "Fire Water Burn" (the roof, the roof, the roof is on fire...). props to MicrowaveCam.com, the makers of the original movies. I wonder what kind of toxic gases were released into the atmosphere during the making of this film?
"North Korea informed China it may drop its plan to test its first atomic bomb if the United States holds bilateral talks with the communist country, a former South Korean lawmaker said Sunday."
It doesn't work, and I'm glad. Giving alot of morons an easy way to get a song isn't that productive. If anyone really wanted the song, they'd record it or create a virtual audio driver that writes to a file as mentioned above, but morons are too lazy to do that.
I am scared. I wish I had more say in this, our democratic system. Why should the government shell out money to help telecoms build fiber optic lines for faster transfer, money that is of the people, and then turn around and allow the telecoms an ability to install toll bridges along the side for when we use the newly availible speed? It's just like a bridge that gives priority to those with the money (large companies, people with big cash) to cross first, except this extends into the informational realm. It's one thing to pay the toll for physically crossing and putting wear on a bridge. It's another to pay monthly for access to something that does not become worn via use, and then pay for access to it again on a pay-per-view basis.
MySpace and similar services do not contribute to the educational experience, and should be blocked to free resouces for those going to school to learn, rather than to meet a desperate, easy blonde who only looks good in over-exposed pictures with which to procreate and further dirty the gene pool. Not a bad move on the government's part, but when it goes so far as to disallow access to content derrived from users who develop profiles and engage in conversation is certainly going to far.
This cuts out many sources of valuable information, sources that are derrived from user contributed content consisting of discussion of the state of events, something required if democracy is to exist. This prevents the opinion of the citizen from reaching the masses -- something already in jeopardy as a majority vote cannot even elect a president. I believe the government is making moves to appease one group of people, while slowly taking away those "certain unalienable Rights" supposedly endowed upon us irreversibly by our creator.
Slashdot Mirror
"Wait until the government can get warrantless wiretaps on the logs of those things."
Yeah, it'd go something like this:
*left*
*left*
*up*
*right*
*down*
*down*
*up*
"Oh my lord, Johnson, he must be planning an attack! Scramble some F-16s and get a trace on the IP address of that Nintendo -- we've got to stop this guy before he hurts someone!"
--or--
*left*
*left*
*up*
*right*
*down*
*down*
*up*
"Hmmm... I think he's trying to get the 'Balls of Steel' cheat to activate. That's an arresting, Johnson, send the local authorities over his way. Kids these days think they can cheat their way through pinball. Disgusting."
sounds like a case where, god forbid, natural childbirth could occur.
your weak argument might have had some substance in the case that you said "there is an affliction killing a large number of people and you are piloting a vehicle that contains the only cure to said affliction when the vehicle begins to overheat" -- but, in order to be consistent with reality, you'd have to append "and this vehicle is powered by a nuclear reactor, and, when cooling is lacking in a nuclear reactor, the reaction has the potential to speed up uncontrollably, causing a larger problem than the lack of the delivery of the medicine, which is destroyed as the vehicle melts down anyway."
if cutting corners on this safety concern causes a problem, the people who need the isotopes are screwed because the isotopes cannot be created if the plant is leveled (worst case) or more damage is caused taking the plant out of commission for an even longer period of time (best case). on the other hand, the engineers who say this is a safety concern could be completely wrong and their heads up their asses, but since we're talking about politicians disagreeing with the engineers, i believe the rectal cranial inversion in question should be attributed to the other side.
luckily, the liberals are looking for a guarantee that ignoring the advice of the Nuclear Safety Commission is safe before they sign.
the world is overpopulated, our growth is not sustainable (chuckle). i guess the scythe will come down either way, be it lack of energy to power our cities, lack of medical nuclear isotopes to save our dying, or fallout because we cut corners on safety concerns. we're fucking with an amazingly powerful thing, this is not sheetrock & roofing, this is not an oil change, this is not even an annual inspection on an airplane -- this is a safety concern with a nuclear reactor.
people who cut corners kill more people than a lack of radio isotopes -- you can quote Anonymous Coward on that one.
Working at a University, this is not a subject I'm not unfamiliar with. Hmm... If something IS a subject that you are NOT UNfamiliar with, then it IS a subject that are ARE familiar with. Therefore, if something is NOT a subject that you are NOT UNfamiliar with, then it is a subject that you are NOT familiar with. In which case, why would one respect your opinion on the subject? You mention you work at a university... Are you the janitor? ;)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-774555780 8969038697
Tons of great shit, sustained grape-produced plasma, soap, peeps, many CDs -- all filmed in microwave and put to Bloodhound Gang's "Fire Water Burn" (the roof, the roof, the roof is on fire...). props to MicrowaveCam.com, the makers of the original movies. I wonder what kind of toxic gases were released into the atmosphere during the making of this film?
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/10/08/nkorea .tests.ap/index.html
"North Korea informed China it may drop its plan to test its first atomic bomb if the United States holds bilateral talks with the communist country, a former South Korean lawmaker said Sunday."
It doesn't work, and I'm glad. Giving alot of morons an easy way to get a song isn't that productive. If anyone really wanted the song, they'd record it or create a virtual audio driver that writes to a file as mentioned above, but morons are too lazy to do that.
Men have been so lucky to have digital toilets for years now. I wonder if they gather statistics...
...apply this editor to my dynamic content management system.
http://www.lazd.net/
I am scared. I wish I had more say in this, our democratic system. Why should the government shell out money to help telecoms build fiber optic lines for faster transfer, money that is of the people, and then turn around and allow the telecoms an ability to install toll bridges along the side for when we use the newly availible speed? It's just like a bridge that gives priority to those with the money (large companies, people with big cash) to cross first, except this extends into the informational realm. It's one thing to pay the toll for physically crossing and putting wear on a bridge. It's another to pay monthly for access to something that does not become worn via use, and then pay for access to it again on a pay-per-view basis.
Disgusting.
MySpace and similar services do not contribute to the educational experience, and should be blocked to free resouces for those going to school to learn, rather than to meet a desperate, easy blonde who only looks good in over-exposed pictures with which to procreate and further dirty the gene pool. Not a bad move on the government's part, but when it goes so far as to disallow access to content derrived from users who develop profiles and engage in conversation is certainly going to far.
This cuts out many sources of valuable information, sources that are derrived from user contributed content consisting of discussion of the state of events, something required if democracy is to exist. This prevents the opinion of the citizen from reaching the masses -- something already in jeopardy as a majority vote cannot even elect a president. I believe the government is making moves to appease one group of people, while slowly taking away those "certain unalienable Rights" supposedly endowed upon us irreversibly by our creator.
Fight it if you can.
if i got this stupid bitch's spam. how does one accidently send an email worldwide?
Free speech is limited. One can't commit slander or libel.
Anyone who is concerned with this should just be more random.