Slashdot Mirror


Brain Control Headset for Gamers

gbjbaanb writes "Gamers will soon be able to interact with the virtual world using their thoughts and emotions alone. Headsets which read neural activity are not new, but Ms Le [president of US/Australian firm Emotiv] said the Epoc was the first consumer device that can be used for gaming. 'This is the first headset that doesn't require a large net of electrodes, or a technician to calibrate or operate it and does require gel on the scalp,' she said. 'It also doesn't cost tens of thousands of dollars.'" Wait until the government can get warrantless wiretaps on the logs of those things.

152 comments

  1. Mindstorms by n3tcat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't wait to see what some hardware hackers can do with this and a Lego Mindstorms NXT robot!

    1. Re:Mindstorms by tristian_was_here · · Score: 1, Funny

      I cant wait till some one mods it for the GTA San Andreas "hot coffee mod"

    2. Re:Mindstorms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait till I write my own malware to override the inputs so that the only way to induce action from the character is when one holds ones genitalia like a joystick. Hehehehee ^ v ^

      Then I'll get my handheld camera and go around capturing videos of people in this posture.

      I coul have Captain Cyborgo aka "Marco" levitating his own balls in no time at all!

      Honestly, I wouldn't be seen wearing one. It looks like a way to make yourself walk around with a twitch for years afterwards. An no big cables they say! The more wireless it is, the better for me.

    3. Re:Mindstorms by Dragonboyjgh · · Score: 1

      agreed, sychronized robo-human dancing would be just the retarded tip of the iceberg. you'd probably end up with lego's infultrating the US(native country for all uncivilized, including if i had to guess, most hackers) area 51 military base and releasing all the supposed aliens kept there, who then will reak their revenge-havoc on the world, killing all of humanity.

      --
      knowledge is power. Power is strong. Garlic is strong. Egro, knowledge is garlic.
  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Yea! Finally Brain Control for Gamera by inicom · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm personally glad to read this, as Gamera has been far too much of a free spirit wrecking havoc with his fire breath. This new era of brain control for Gamera should focus his energies far better to protect the cities of Japan.

    --
    -a.e.mossberg
  4. And you thought CTS was bad by bentcd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Another new word of the 21st century:

    brain sprain
    Usage: "I sprained my brain playing HalfLife all through the weekend".

    --
    sigs are hazardous to your health
  5. Mind control? by zaaj · · Score: 1

    When I first read that headline, I read it as a headset that enables one to control the mind, vs. using the mind to control something. Perhaps that's because I'm listening to the 7th Son trilogy over at podiobooks.com...

    1. Re:Mind control? by bewildered_one · · Score: 1

      i read it that way too - i do think that would be far more entertaining though.... but possibly a little unethical

    2. Re:Mind control? by harry666t · · Score: 1

      I can already control your brain (to some extend).

      If you do not understand how, read this comment until you do.

      You just executed my code.

    3. Re:Mind control? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you expect to control my brain when you can't even control your own typing? Extend, sheesh.

    4. Re:Mind control? by sneekygeeky · · Score: 1

      Dammit! You got me!

  6. I wonder. by AltGrendel · · Score: 5, Interesting
    When will people like Mr. S. Hawking get one?

    Probably could help them quiet a bit with things.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:I wonder. by Threni · · Score: 1

      If there's one thing Stephen Hawking doesn't need, it's help from Slashdot readers...

    2. Re:I wonder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably could help them quiet a bit with things. Only if it doesn't work.
    3. Re:I wonder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Womewhy, I don't think Hawking would be much of a gamer.

    4. Re:I wonder. by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

      Womewhy, I don't think Hawking would be much of a gamer. You don't know? Stephen Hawking's a Quake master!
    5. Re:I wonder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we tried it. He said the Milky Way's twice as big as it was now he can neurally manipulate Excel.

    6. Re:I wonder. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      But could he take Chuck Norris?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re:I wonder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Dr. Hawking to you

    8. Re:I wonder. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      new they have to develop a brain for the gamer too.

    9. Re:I wonder. by ATMD · · Score: 1

      There's nothing worse than an incorrect pedant.

      Steven Hawking is a professor.

      --
      Nobody else has this sig.
    10. Re:I wonder. by OK+PC · · Score: 1

      "I call it a Hawking Headset"

      --
      Did you get that thing I sent ya?
  7. Still needs development by firex726 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I remember seeing these demonstrated at my college a few months back. At the time we could use them to point, and type things; but they were very slow and somewhat inaccurate.

    At the time they did not have a "Backspace" method, so when you typed "O" instead of "P" you would still have to use the keyboard to delete it.

    Found a YouTube video of it, but I think this one from a different company.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhR076duc8M

    1. Re:Still needs development by stereoroid · · Score: 1

      That's software, a separate issue. If I get one of these, all it has to do is emulate a mouse, then I will want to use it with e.g. Dasher, on top of a Tablet PC interface.

      --
      (this is not a .sig)
  8. Bad summary. by Dibblah · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look closer at the text. It looks like the device reads *facial expressions* through pointed sensors touching the skin. Yay. That sounds comfortable.

    1. Re:Bad summary. by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmmm. That doesn't sound any better than the Atari Mindlink developed in the early eighties. That thing was reported to give players terrible headaches.

      http://www.atarimuseum.com/videogames/consoles/2600/mindlink.html
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atari_Mindlink

      --
      +0 Meh
    2. Re:Bad summary. by hal2814 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's exactly what it is. I found a picture of it online if anyone is interested.

    3. Re:Bad summary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually not that uncomfortable. I got a chance to play around with it since I know a few of the engineers working on the device. I do believe they're slashdot readers too.

      What's really interesting is that it actually takes a fair bit of concentration for it to work like you want it to.

    4. Re:Bad summary. by randyest · · Score: 1

      That pic is the early prototype that only detects eye-related facial expressions. The production version detects much more subtle changes. Here's a picture.

      --
      everything in moderation
    5. Re:Bad summary. by Identity+Missing · · Score: 1

      The text doesn't suggest any such thing. Facial expressions happen to produce a lot of neural activity, which make them easy to pick up - a lot easier than most thoughts by themselves. Expressions thus make a natural focus of such an early instrument. Sensors on your face would kind of ruin the point.

  9. maybe I miss read. by BrianHursey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did it say it required gel or did not. I have had multiple EEG's and the gel is not fun. It is like gel with sand in it. "This is the first headset that doesn't require a large net of electrodes, or a technician to calibrate or operate it and does require gel on the scalp," she said. "It also doesn't cost tens of thousands of dollars."

    --
    Linux is like a teepee. It has no windows, no gates, and there's an Apache inside.
    1. Re:maybe I miss read. by WC+as+Kato · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yep, that's an awkward sentence. Does it require gel or not?! And how does it taste?

      --
      --- I'm Green Hornet's sidekick not Inspector Clouseau's!
    2. Re:maybe I miss read. by somersault · · Score: 5, Funny

      But even more importantly - will it blend?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:maybe I miss read. by vikstar · · Score: 1

      But even more importantly - will it blend? Lol. But dammit, I never get moderator points when I want them. Parent: +1 Funny.
      --
      The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.
    4. Re:maybe I miss read. by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      Well I've recently had 3 EEG's and it wasn't too bad, you just wipe the area with an alcohol swab after pulling it off, it took about 20 seconds to be completely free and clean of the thing...There were only ten electrodes though. Maybe the gel they use for higher density arrays is different or its just more of a pain because theres more stuff to stick to your skull.

    5. Re:maybe I miss read. by BrianHursey · · Score: 1

      EEG's have gotten better over the years. The last one I got was 5 years ago. The first one I got was 1990. Your right I think there are less electrodes than before, although I never count I think there were more than 10 though. All I know is each time I go the experience gets better. BTW I have epilepsy that is why I have them. I probably have had 6 in my life.

      --
      Linux is like a teepee. It has no windows, no gates, and there's an Apache inside.
    6. Re:maybe I miss read. by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      I was just playing lab rat so I think I got the standard number for research which is probably less precise than whatever is used in a clinical setting. Also the sensitivity of individual electrodes may have increased as you mentioned. I was mostly just commenting on the fact that the gel didn't really cause any problems or annoyances with me.

  10. I like the way it looks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But does it come with a tinfoil hat.

  11. just what every MMORPGer needs. by will_die · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now when you die alone in your studio apartment the decomposing of your brain will be interpreted as commands, further delaying the chance that someone will alert the police that something is wrong.

    1. Re:just what every MMORPGer needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Depending on your guild mates to call the cops is probably a stretch. They'd probably just loot your corpse. You're better off hoping that your girlfriend, boss or friends notice that you're missing... Nevermind.

    2. Re:just what every MMORPGer needs. by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      Well if they're dead then what does it matter? Unless you have found a way to bring back the recently deceased that is.

    3. Re:just what every MMORPGer needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "There is a big difference between all dead and mostly dead"

    4. Re:just what every MMORPGer needs. by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, except a decomposing brain usually means that the owner of said brain is 100% dead. Or watching American Idol.

    5. Re:just what every MMORPGer needs. by MORB · · Score: 1

      Now when you die alone in your studio apartment the decomposing of your brain will be interpreted as commands, further delaying the chance that someone will alert the police that something is wrong.

      What's wrong with dead players? They can still compete in 2vs2 arena as resto druids.

    6. Re:just what every MMORPGer needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like a defribulator? (I'm aware I can't spell)

      Also, fresh bodies can be used for organ donation, so even if you can't save THEM, you might be able to save someone else.

    7. Re:just what every MMORPGer needs. by BigJClark · · Score: 1


      right. Like mmorpg players have brains.

      *snicker* I kid, I kid ;)

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    8. Re:just what every MMORPGer needs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean discombobulator.

  12. Is anyone slightly worried about some of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is definately a technology i'm interested in, it will be awesome for game controlling and possibly helpful for the disabled. However, I think there are some concerns which need to addressed in its application.

    For example, the Half-Life 2 games send an enormous ammount of information to Valve regarding player performance and interaction.

    Do you really want your emotional reactions broadcast over the internet? Aren't these pitfalls and questions inevitable with this technology?

    1. Re:Is anyone slightly worried about some of this? by somersault · · Score: 5, Funny

      *somewhere deep underground in an abandoned missile silo*

      Evil Data Mining Henchman: Look, master! This one smiles for 62% of the time while playing Half-Life 2! And they only have 512MB of RAM!

      Evil Data Mining Master: MWAAAHAHAHAHHHAHHAHAHAA!! Excellent work, Patrick! Soon we shall know just how much all of those poor fools are smiling! My intricately pointless and entirely impotent plan for world domination is almost complete!!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Is anyone slightly worried about some of this? by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
      You joke, but that's not a bad business model.

      Think about it. Internet access and in-game ads are already standard fare. Add the headset data and you can (presumably) see which ones people respond favorably to. Which is data that you can then sell.

      Of course, once we get this hooked up to CNN we can see who to round up for re-education, but that comes later...

      Evil Data Mining Henchman: Look, master! This one smiles for 62% of the time while playing Half-Life 2! And they only have 512MB of RAM! Evil Data Mining Master: MWAAAHAHAHAHHHAHHAHAHAA!! Excellent work, Patrick! Soon we shall know just how much all of those poor fools are smiling! My intricately pointless and entirely impotent plan for world domination is almost complete!!
  13. Not really by joeyblades · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been seeing these claims for years, but this technology is not really based on thought. It's just one form of bio-feedback. It is an example of control without conventional physical contact, but it does not process structured thought. The user typically has to train themselves to control the feedback mechanism. This is NOT reeading thoughts and taking some action. It is using thoughts to modulate some physical process. In that sense, it's not much different than training your fingers to operate a game controller.

    1. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then what are thoughts? The voice in your head that you identify as yourself? When that "thinks" in words, your voicebox moves. It's just speech with the volume turned down as far as possible, and it's possible to detect it (though a bit harder than more obvious signals).

    2. Re:Not really by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      Pictures, sounds, and video too. Call it hypertext, I guess :)

      I've always thought one of the most fascinating potential uses for BCI was in music composition. Mentally "hear" a sound and the sound is suddenly there. No more fussing around trying to figure out what the right note or chord is. Presumably it could work the same way in art.

    3. Re:Not really by somersault · · Score: 2

      Source please? Not that I don't believe you, but that's very interesting. What happens when you visualise yourself playing tennis (in the first person) then?

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Not really by joeyblades · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Then what are thoughts?

      This question is key. No one knows. There are a lot of people working on a lot of theories, but none of them have anything tangible yet. Until we understand how the brain creates thoughts, we can't expect a computer interface to interpret them.

      > The voice in your head that you identify as yourself?

      Now we're branching into the philosophical, but I'll bite. No, that voice is just one manifestation of thoughts. What about the movies that play out in your brain? Would you not classify these as thoughts, yet often they would not correlate with potential verbalizations? There are other concepts in my head that I don't have a clue how to put into words. I may attempt it from time-to-time, but these verbalizations are byproducts of the original thought. They may, in fact, be unique thoughts of their own, but they are not the root thoughts.

      > When that "thinks" in words, your voicebox moves. It's just speech with the volume turned down
      > as far as possible, and it's possible to detect it ...

      Interesting theory. I've never seen anyone make this claim before. While I think it's possible that the larynx undergoes some change when we think of vocalizations, I doubt that it is a relaiable reproduction of the movements associated with the potential verbalization. Here's why I have my doubts:

          (1) The voice in my head speaks much faster than I am able to reproduce with my larynx
          (2) The voice in my head continues to ramble on, even when I'm eating or drinking

      and most damning to your theory

          (3) Sometimes the voice in my head is going on about one thing at the same time I'm speaking about something else entirely

    5. Re:Not really by ardent99 · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing the relationships here. The way I understand it is that when you talk, certain parts of your brain related to speech formulation activate. When you *imagine* yourself talking, the same parts of your brain activate. But that doesn't mean your larynx starts moving.

      The same is true for other physical activities. This effect is often referenced in discussions about why visualization is an effective exercise.

    6. Re:Not really by ardent99 · · Score: 1

      Just because you are training yourself to manipulate your brain waves to get the effects you want doesn't mean it isn't thought. You constantly manipulate your own thoughts in a bio-feedback loop to get the effects you want; it is called "learning".

      When you learn to ski, for example, you start out thinking consciously about what movements are necessary, and gradually through practice (bio-feedback), you train your mind and body to act appropriately without consciousness of the steps involved. I don't think you'd argue that your body isn't controlled by your thoughts.

      In fact, I'd go out on a limb here and say that when people get good at this technology, they might actually start to feel like the device or game being controlled feels a bit like a part of their body, because they'll be able to control it without conscious thought, just like they could ski or walk without conscious thought!

    7. Re:Not really by joeyblades · · Score: 1

      > I don't think you'd argue that your body isn't controlled by your thoughts. No. That's exactly my point. Learning to control some game with bio-feedback is no different than learning to control the same game with a joystick, at least, not with respect to the role your brain plays. My point is that isn't the game controller reading thoughts anymore than operating a joystick is reading thoughts.

    8. Re:Not really by joeyblades · · Score: 1

      > Source please? It's not clear to me who or what your question is referenced to. What specifically gives you pause?

    9. Re:Not really by joeyblades · · Score: 1

      Damn... I keep forgetting to switch to Plain Old Text.

      Sorry for the ugly posts.

    10. Re:Not really by mikael · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered whether this would work for pets as well. If you measured the electrical activity around the areas related to vocalisation, maybe we could figure what they are thinking about. Although it is usually easy to guess as they always look in the direction of what they are thinking about.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    11. Re:Not really by 7Prime · · Score: 1

      That's exactly like learning to play an instrument. The instrument really becomes an extension of you. Obviously singing is the most automatic because we already have the hardware built-in to be able to do it, but that doesn't mean that everyone can sing exactly what they hear in their head... most people aren't tone deaf, but a large percentage of people can't manipulate their voice to match what they hear. Eventually, you train yourself to be able to use the instrument more effectively.

      I used to play the trumpet in HS (I'm a keyboardist now, sorta by default), and I was able to hear a sound and just my body would do the neccessary things in order to produce what I wanted. That's really no different from neurofeedback (which I've also done at various times), you have to train your brain to manipulate itself in a certain way to produce the neccessary stimuli to match what you're thinking.

      Currently, there is no way to program an EEG to play back music that you hear in your head, similary, there is no way to program an EEG to automatically respond to game commands like, "go left", "attack". Your brain has to do the translation, because we still don't know how to read that high level of functions. So, in a sense, there's really no difference between "playing with your brain" and "playing with your fingers".

      In traditional gameplay... your brain has to be taught that when it thinks "move left", it translates that to "press left thumb toward the palm" (on a gamepad). With an EEG, your brain must be taught that when it thinks "move left", it translates that to "raise beta waves in frequency range X". The synapse reconstruction to train those two things are pretty similar. So there's not a huge gain in efficiency to play a game or an instrument with an EEG.

      My degree is in electro-acoustic music composition, and I came very close to doing a project in trying to take an EEG and use it to build a midi instrument, but then I realized that it wouldn't be much different from learning to play any other physical instrument... it's simply a novelty. Until we can train computers to understand direct, high-level thought patterns, we're never going to be doing anything more than training our minds in similar ways than we train our bodies, and frankly... there's not a lot of benefits to that.

      Add to this that our brains are used to training our bodies, day in and day out... we're relitively good at it. Our brains have no experience training brainwave patterns. Learning how to work an EEG is a lot more difficult than learning how to manipulate a keyboard or gamepad.

      --
      Multiplayer Gaming (defined): Sitting around, discussing single-player games with my friends, at the bar.
    12. Re:Not really by somersault · · Score: 1
      I was referring to the comment that I was replying to. I have removed the first sentence for you:

      The voice in your head that you identify as yourself? When that "thinks" in words, your voicebox moves. It's just speech with the volume turned down as far as possible, and it's possible to detect it (though a bit harder than more obvious signals).
      --
      which is totally what she said
    13. Re:Not really by joeyblades · · Score: 1

      In that case, I concur with you. This is a subject that I have studied much and I've never heard that "voicebox" theory. I'm trying not to be totally dismissive, but references are necessary for me to give it much credence.

    14. Re:Not really by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      >> When that "thinks" in words, your voicebox moves. It's just speech with the volume turned down
      >> as far as possible, and it's possible to detect it ...

      >Interesting theory. I've never seen anyone make this claim before. While I think it's possible that the
      >larynx undergoes some change when we think of vocalizations, I doubt that it is a relaiable reproduction
      >of the movements associated with the potential verbalization. Here's why I have my doubts:

      The description of the GP is a little off, but what they're talking about is called subvocalization, and it's been a staple of control systems for high tech personal computers in SF novels for quite some time.

      You're right that it doesn't happen all the time though. It's particularly evident when you're focused on reading something or trying to sound a word out in your head.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  14. And now you've gotten the song stuck in my head. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gamera, Gamera!
    Gamera is really neat!
    He is filled with turtle meat!
    We all love you Gamera!

  15. Incredible by Mickyfin613 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Soon all effort will be removed from gaming what-so-ever. Think of all the precious calories we can save playing World of Warcraft with our minds! Wonder if the twitch reaction timing will mean I can finally beat a Warlock 1v1.

    1. Re:Incredible by mouko · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because most of us WoW players are running low on spare calories...

    2. Re:Incredible by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Not even the speed of thought can save you from the Skill Coil.

    3. Re:Incredible by ryzynforce · · Score: 1

      The simple answer to that is NO! you will not be able to beat a warlock 1v1... You will still be pummeled by their pet. Only twice as fast! (this is a joke)

      --
      It's all fun and games until someone takes an eye out!
    4. Re:Incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twitch doesn't really matter in games like World of Warcraft.

    5. Re:Incredible by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      ...playing World of Warcraft with our minds! One could argue the impossibility of such a thing, regardless of what input controller is used.
      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

  16. Radio guys have purpose again by Mishra100 · · Score: 1

    From the article: "It picks up electrical activity from the brain and sends wireless signals to a computer," said Tan Le, president of US/Australian firm Emotiv."

    So instead of trying to pick up cordless phone signals and listening to conversations, they can instead sniff into the wireless signal and pick up thoughts!

    I just can't wait to see the blog articles from this! :)

  17. Future by im_rotting · · Score: 0

    That picture is awesome. I can't wait for the future.

    1. Re:Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  18. Typo? by Tsoat · · Score: 1

    it says in the article "does require gel" but it's listed with things it no longer requires im wondering if that was a typo or not. Im interested to see how this works out. I wonder if someone would be able to hack either the device itself or whatever console they're gaming on and read their thoughts?

  19. Is this really nessary. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Wait until the government can get warrantless wiretaps on the logs of those things."

    Must every paragraph be twisted and poked until it makes some political comment. I don't know about the rest of you but I find it very annoying. Politics is only a small section that effect peoples lives. Things do happen without a political motive or really needs a political comantary. I think we as a people are getting obsessive over politics, everything needs a deep meaning. It doesn't enjoy life a bit.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Is this really nessary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wiretapping a device of this sort would result in a log that looks something like this:

      "Left! Left! Right! Up! DAMNIT SHOOT HIM! AIM UP STUPID! DAMNIT! WHY DO YOU SUCK SO MUCH? OMG!"

  20. Boom Headshot? by zulater · · Score: 1

    Will I just be able to think "boom headshot" and become 'l33t' at CS?

  21. I read it wrong by slaker · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did anyone else mis-read that headline as "Birth Control for gamers" or is it just me?

    --
    -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    1. Re:I read it wrong by somersault · · Score: 1

      There's a pointless product if ever there was one! You should go post it in the Half Bakery ;)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:I read it wrong by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I read it correctly, but "Brain Control Headset" frightened me at first. Then I realized that I don't play games, so I don't have to worry about being controlled.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:I read it wrong by Anarchitektur · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes, I did. Then I realized how useless such an invention would be and re-read the title.

    4. Re:I read it wrong by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Heh - I took it one step further - "Birth Control Handset for gamers." I'm sure they have that already.

    5. Re:I read it wrong by GeordieMac · · Score: 1

      Trust me... gamers don't need birth control.

    6. Re:I read it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah... like gamers need birth control.

    7. Re:I read it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because I'm rather sure that saying "Birth control for Gamers" is redundant.

    8. Re:I read it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though you thought you read it wrong, it's probably close to the truth. Once they come out with a full-immersion headset (with direct neural I/O to all senses) I doubt any gamer is going to take the thing off.

  22. Controlled by gamers thoughts.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is amazing. I didn't think it was possible to control a character on screen with just thoughts of tits and anime.

  23. Warrantless wiretaps by PingXao · · Score: 1

    The government doesn't need "to get" warrantless wiretaps. They need to GET a warrant. That's the whole point of warrantless surveillance. You don't need to GET anything. You just do it without any oversight. No one watches the watchers. If the think you should be monitored for any reason whatsoever they will do so. Our political leaders have let us down, and that's putting it mildly.

    1. Re:Warrantless wiretaps by QuantumHack · · Score: 1, Informative

      All this hand-wringing about "warrantless wiretaps" is wasted energy. Unless you are intentionally planning/doing stuff to harm people, you need not worry about this.

      Having worked in intelligence, I can tell you: the government does not care what books you check out at the library, or what [legal] porn you download. They have enough trouble looking for whack jobs who are trying to bring down buildings and/or networks.

      There have been so many foiled plots from these so-called warrantless wiretaps, plots that if carried would have killed thousands or brought Internet businesses to their knees, that if you knew the full truth, you'd be glad these wiretaps exist. As it is, the general public can't know everything, because it would compromise the very intelligence gathering that saves lives. So, therefore, we must put up with paranoid whining.

      If you don't want your brain waves to be read by the government, then don't freaking connect your box to the Internet or the phone line. Go ahead. Be paranoid for nothing.

      --
      www.backwoodsengineer.com
    2. Re:Warrantless wiretaps by xtheunknown · · Score: 1

      Having also worked in Intelligence, I can say you couldn't be more wrong. The government cares about everything you do, read, watch, buy. Eespecially THIS government. When the Patriot Act was passed the government promised that it would be used to catch terrorists. Which lasted about 15 minutes. The first case prosecuted with Patriot Act powers was an OBSCENITY case. We're not talking child porn here. Just adult material that SOME find objectionable. Be afraid, be VERY afraid.

      --

      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    3. Re:Warrantless wiretaps by WK2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All this hand-wringing about "warrantless wiretaps" is wasted energy. Unless you are intentionally planning/doing stuff to harm people, you need not worry about this.

      Or if you plan to do drugs. Or if you speak critically of the government. Or if you plan to do anything at all that someone else might find objectionable (which is pretty much everything). Or if you just don't want your dirty laundry in public view.

      There have been so many foiled plots from these so-called warrantless wiretaps, plots that if carried would have killed thousands or brought Internet businesses to their knees, that if you knew the full truth, you'd be glad these wiretaps exist.

      Name one.

      As it is, the general public can't know everything, because it would compromise the very intelligence gathering that saves lives.

      That's a little too convenient.

      For what it's worth, I believe you when you say you've worked in intelligence. You spout the same things they do.

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    4. Re:Warrantless wiretaps by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      If we are not to be told the truth now, then when? 40 years hence? How complete will the record be? How will we know that it has not been tampered with?

      We want documentation, complete and thorough, of the scope and findings of the wiretaps (redacted for privacy, of course), even if we won't see it for a few decades, and we want this documentation to have been reviewed by all branches of government. Warrants provide some kind of documentation. If our intelligence agencies are unsatisfied even with retroactive warrants issued by what is perceived to be a rubber-stamp court, this implies to us that the government is being malicious.

      Don't give us this "it's for your own good" bullshit. Even if we don't get to see it, we want somebody outside of the agency performing the tap to approve, and we want to eventually find out exactly what was recorded. This is what separation of powers is all about; adherence to this principle is non-negotiable, and transgression thereof shall be punished as severely as possible in the court of public opinion.

    5. Re:Warrantless wiretaps by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      How fast before the get out of argument free card - "It's classified" - is pulled out?

      Actually, I kind of agree with him.....if you aren't doing anything worth monitoring, there probably aren't enough resources to bother monitor you. However, if you "spark their interest", you can bet something is happening, and you probably don't know about it.

      Layne

    6. Re:Warrantless wiretaps by rpillala · · Score: 1

      You're talking about the government as though it's a monolith. Policy has to be written to withstand efforts to abuse it. You can't go based on what you as a principled person would do. You have to go based on what your worst enemy with no morals whatosever will do, because those people find their way into power too.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  24. Think in Russian by Thelasko · · Score: 1

    If you think thinking in Russian will keep the Government from spying on your thoughts, you are wrong. The US government has plenty of people who know Russian left over from the Cold War. Based on the current state of US intelligence, I think you are better off thinking in Farsi.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:Think in Russian by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

      I believe this is a reference to the movie Firefox, starring Clint Eastwood. In order to operate the mind-controlled weapons onboard the plane, he has to think in Russian.

  25. You and me by Apoorv · · Score: 0

    You think : Wow! This is amazing for gamers! This will help the disabled! This is a new breakthrough in technology! It would bring about a whole new era of gaming. I think : Guess what the FBI will use next?

  26. Re:YES! by somersault · · Score: 1

    You're trying to say you've been going all this time without one? I think I'd have gotten bored pretty quick of all this internet stuff without it. No workstation is complete without a cockpit simulator!

    --
    which is totally what she said
  27. For this to work... by Undead+Ed · · Score: 1

    For this to work, you must be a gamer *and* you must have a brain.

    OK.

    Ed

  28. HAL would say ... by Kvasio · · Score: 2, Funny

    Without your space helmet, Dave, you're going to find that rather difficult.

  29. There is one major flaw... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this is reading your genuine emotions and transferring them to your ingame avatar you will be unable to lie effectively to your fellow players.

    Just imagine it, blue teammate 3 gets horribly slaughtered, you type "sorry mate, didn't know they had set up an ambush there" but at the same time the headset has your avatar bent over double laughing himself silly... team games will never be the same again.

  30. Split Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The original article does not mention that this device is gender specific. In fact, it only shows the version for women.

    The version for men has two similar but distinct components, taking in account the known anatomic specificities of male brains: men have two separate brains, a northern and a southern one.

    No man has sufficient blood to feed both brains, so the basic package includes one sensor only. (it is the south-brain-version. Will do for most gamers and internet surfers).

  31. Get Over Yourself TacoBoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uncle Sugar couldn't give a shit what's going on in your brain. Warrantless wiretaps are for assholes providing direct aid and comfort to the enemy, like this cunt.

    You mean nothing to Uncle Sugar. So get over yourself and go back to pleasuring yourself with that new jumbo butt-plug that arrived today from chunksingravy.com.

  32. MIsread by King+Jerk · · Score: 1

    I misread the summary title as Birth Control Headset for gamers and thought "Man, am I playing the wrong games"

  33. This is progress? by Poseiden · · Score: 0, Insightful
    Is nobody else seeing the terrible downsides to the technology that we are inventing here?

    Imagine a world 30 years from now where robots running on ____ fuel do all of the worlds manual labor. Meanwhile, there are gigantic slums of the poor dying off due to starvation because they have no jobs because the robots can do it for less. Governments won't care because the transfer of power from democratic governments will move to our increasingly large corporations - think feudal. The ones with the jobs are the robot programmers, makers, and all other job sectors still left after such a shift from labor to services is complete. It's these people (many of us would be included in this technological future, of course) that still hate their jobs and go home and hook up to a virtual reality machine to, not be happy, but merely relieve the stress of work.

    We don't need a hostile AI takeover to enslave us in the Matrix; we have been enslaving ourselves in the Matrix ever since the industrial revolution. Are we happier? No. Why are we doing it? Evolution. Machines are simply the next evolution after Man.

    1. Re:This is progress? by Malevolent+Tester · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, there are gigantic slums of the poor dying off due to starvation because they have no jobs because the robots can do it for less Good they'll have welfare then, isn't it? Partly because these evil corporations who've transferred power from democratic government still need someone to buy their products, and partly because from a pragmatic viewpoint it's easier to give them taxpayer funded bread and circuses than deal with food riots. People don't starve quietly, as the Romanovs and Bourbons couldn't tell you.

      Governments won't care because the transfer of power from democratic governments will move to our increasingly large corporations - think feudal Corporations are interested in making money. Feudalism's a shit system for that. Think oligarchy instead.

      We don't need a hostile AI takeover to enslave us in the Matrix; we have been enslaving ourselves in the Matrix ever since the industrial revolution. To which I'd reply with the same question I have for all primitivists - yes, the industrial age fucked up society in a big way, but who chooses which 4/5ths of the world's population dies so we can all go back to some pastoral utopia?
      --
      If you haven't made a developer cry, you've wasted a day.
    2. Re:This is progress? by Poseiden · · Score: 0
      Well I would suppose some kind of gigantic computer....

      Oh..... wait...

  34. THANKS by ajlitt · · Score: 1

    for sharing.

  35. Time for the "Nintendo Whoah (TM)"? by s_p_oneil · · Score: 1

    With this, hopefully no one would slip and throw their controller into the TV. It would be a tad bit uncomfortable with it being strapped to their head.

    I'm a bit surprised they don't offer the option of a head-mounted display. They've already got the head-tracking, but that kinda sucks if your display doesn't move with you.

  36. Better than reality? by yoinkityboinkity · · Score: 1

    With all this VR stuff, I hate to rain on the parade, but as we get closer and closer to reality, what exactly is the advantage? At what point do people go outside and say, hey, this actual reality thing has better resolution! I understand that you can change or eliminate the rules in VR. But, if the rules are invented by people (you know, those things that go to war incessantly), then the rules are probably going to be worse and MORE annoying. So, I think I will stick with actual reality. Just a thought.

    1. Re:Better than reality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: Porn

  37. I'm surprised by Phoenix666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    No one brought up the inevitable hack to enable "no-hands" surfing for pr0n.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:I'm surprised by smackt4rd · · Score: 1

      I think the facial reading/emotion features could be used for more interesting things than just "surfing" for pr0n. :D

  38. Actual neural interface from 1996 by James+McP · · Score: 1

    I saw one at CompUSA back in '98-99 and played with the skiing game. It was able to steer correctly about 75% of the time; not bad since I just walked up and plopped my finger on the little sensor.

    Go to http:\\other90.com for an unobtrusive "neural" interface. It's really a biometric sensor that's able to get some very crude up/down/left/right input. Of course, their website is straight out of 1998 and it doesn't look like they have made any significant effort to rewrite their software for 2k, let alone XP.

    Given that it never seemed to make any inroads at any time, I sometimes wonder if the system would only work for a minority of people. It seems like even the crude data input it had would be excellent to integrate into artificial limbs.

    --
    I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
  39. Can it replace my retarded left hand on WASD? by BcNexus · · Score: 1

    My left hand is retarded, always fat-fingering the 'a' and 's' keys while typing on home row. It's not much better when gaming with WASD. I'd snap one of these bad boys up if it it's better than my left hand mashing the WASD keys.

  40. Limitations by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    interact with the virtual world using their thoughts

    I'm in management, you insensitive clod!

  41. Rumbbblllle Ppppack by Kaishaku255 · · Score: 0

    I've bbbeeen bbbeeeta tesstingg the rumbbbllle pppaack for the llaaast tttwwoo dddayys.

    --

    Seppuku: Your solution to my problems!

  42. Re:YES! by cromar · · Score: 1

    Are you coming on to me?

  43. is it wrong? by McBeer · · Score: 1

    When I read the title I immediately started hoping they had invented a headset that would allow me to control other peoples' brains. This isn't nearly as cool.

    --
    Hikery.net - The best hiking site ever. Made by yours truly.
  44. Gel scalp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The words were a little misleading at one point. Do you need gel on your scalp to play it?

  45. video of the device in action at GDC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Videos of the general public giving the headset a go:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0

  46. Good for the disabled but useless for the rest. by __aailob1448 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The brain is designed to control the body. Our hands are the most useful part of it, with reason.

    The next step will have to be some sort of glove ...we could call it a POWER GLOVE! Maybe nintendo can use it for the next console.

    But seriously, it'll have to be that. The big problem is making sure it understands our intentions enough to be useful. Imagine a pianist that can airplay wearing a glove that understand which key he meant to hit (How? Good luck with that...). THAT is the next step and it's hard as hell.

    Until then, all we can do is make more ergonomic pads, mice (wiimote is a 3D mouse, fun but doesn't provide more efficient control) and keyboards.

    1. Re:Good for the disabled but useless for the rest. by IdeaMan · · Score: 1

      The problem is not making the device understand us. It's training us to properly stimulate the device.
      Think Biofeedback without all the kooky health nuts.

      --
      They ARE out to get you simply because They are in it for themselves and they don't care about you.
  47. A scary image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this catches on, the official hardcore-gamer stereotype will have to change. No longer will the Cheeto's-encrusted Inuyasha t-shirt be their emblem. You will know them by the facial expressions they have carefully trained over the years: cartoonishly exaggerated smiles, frowns, and raised eyebrows with statue-still eyes. Mechanically timed for just as long as it takes to register the signal on World of Warcraft III, and then back to nothing. Their parents will think they're on drugs, and society will think they're serial killers; indeed with clown makeup they'd probably look a lot like John Wayne Gacy.

    Am I kidding? I'm not even sure; I do know I'm not playing any such game for any long period.

  48. Combined this with VR and... We can all stay home by posys · · Score: 1

    ...and only go into "work" when we want to?

    --
    The Future is already here, just unevenly distributed... THE ROBOTIC WAGELESS ECONOMY NOW! http://RoboEco.com/slash
  49. As a person typing in pain now by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    if this works even a little- combined with voice control it would be a godsend.

    I deal with pain-3 (on a 1-10 scale) all the time now. Mousing is much worse than typing tho. Partially carpal, partially chemo, partially diabetes. The laser off the eyes devices would also very helpful for the total package. And foot pedals.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  50. Re:YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *squirt*

    I guess I am! Well, did.

  51. It uses wi-fi ... yuck... probably dangerous. by Abuzar · · Score: 0

    There's no way I'm putting a Wi-Fi device on my head. Who knows what all that radiation can do so closely to your head? I don't even use cell phones anymore, because the studies done on radiation are no where near conclusive that it's safe.

    Why couldn't they go with an IR interface instead?

    I know, I know, lots of nerds think it's safe enough... but until there's more concrete studies showing that this isn't a health hazard (or discredit the studies that show it is hazardous), I don't think it is worth taking the risk with my health (or anyone else).

    There have been way too many cases where we have seen things approved by authorities as "safe" (or safe enough), but were later withdrawn because they caused a lot of lives to be lost. More scrutiny about health hazards is needed.

  52. Its about time by PPH · · Score: 1


    Having to move my thumbs was too exhausting.


    Now, if they could just do something about that stair climb out of my mom's basement.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  53. Wiretaps... by lazd.net · · Score: 1

    "Wait until the government can get warrantless wiretaps on the logs of those things."

    Yeah, it'd go something like this:

    *left*
    *left*
    *up*
    *right*
    *down*
    *down*
    *up*

    "Oh my lord, Johnson, he must be planning an attack! Scramble some F-16s and get a trace on the IP address of that Nintendo -- we've got to stop this guy before he hurts someone!"

    --or--

    *left*
    *left*
    *up*
    *right*
    *down*
    *down*
    *up*

    "Hmmm... I think he's trying to get the 'Balls of Steel' cheat to activate. That's an arresting, Johnson, send the local authorities over his way. Kids these days think they can cheat their way through pinball. Disgusting."

  54. Brainstorm by carrier+lost · · Score: 1

    Natalie Wood would be happy.

  55. Every seven seconds... on average. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words, 90% of female WoW toons will be pitching a tent every 7 seconds?

  56. Didn't Atari try this with the VCS? by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall Atari dabbling with this kind of brain interface junk back in the days of the 2600. I can't recall the name or if it ever made it past the mock-up stage, but if it had been released, it'd probably have gone the way of the U-Force.

    Most likely though, this thing will probably fail just as miserably as the Virtual Boy. People simply don't like uncomfortable, ugly-looking gadgets attached to their heads. (Especially stuff requiring frequent, repetative head movement.)

    On the other hand, fans of the movie, "Strange Days" will probably eat it up.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  57. Re:I wonder. If ANYthing, Slashdot could do well by davidsyes · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hacking Hawking. Or, Hawking Hawking... and grafting him onto Slashdot... Might improve the moderation system, or...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  58. Re:I wonder. If ANYthing, Slashdot could do well by Daimanta · · Score: 1

    Modded +ln(e^1) Funny.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  59. USB? by jadin · · Score: 1

    I still want the USB version.. direct link to my brain.

  60. EEG-based control is probably hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just did a final project for a neurotech seminar course on exactly what EEGs (electroencephalograms, or signals picked up using electrodes on the scalp) are capable of doing, and at the end of it I compared my results to the claims for this product. Basically, unless they've done some seriously groundbreaking research, many of their claims are complete bullshit.

    An EEG signal, in the best possible conditions (i.e. 15 minutes of set-up with a technician, weeks of training, a much larger number of electrodes than could fit on their headset, application of sticky gel to help the connection, etc.) is capable of decent two-dimensional control (see Wolpaw and McFarland, 2004), with some clever computing. Not precise enough to power anything more than some pretty boring games, but decent. There's just no freakin' way, though, that they have reliable motion on six different axes simultaneously with a 16-electrode, one-size-fits-all headset.

    Even single-dimensional control, that is, moving a single variable up and down (usually by controlling alpha waves), requires training, is not all that precise, and is just a form of biofeedback, as a previous poster mentioned. That's been done plenty of times, like in the "BrainBall" game previously covered by slashdot. http://slashdot.org/articles/00/02/18/1041219.shtml/

    This isn't counting muscle movement, though; movements of the scalp and face muscles produce huge electrical potentials, and so there's plenty of potential for control there. If the device is cheap enough, this might be fun to play with, but I still think they're overselling it - these muscle motion detections are probably the only things powering huge portions of their software.

    To back all this up, the little promotional material they've released doesn't show convincing control at all. They used to have a video up of a dude pretending to move rocks with the headset (can't seem to find it now), which was really terribly-disguised showmanship. The man was accomplishing the task, but only because there was no way for him to fail, and there didn't seem to be any correlation between his movements and the single-dimensional (forward-only) movement that happened on the screen.

    So, again, this could be a worthwhile product, but Emotiv has made some impossible claims, and has lots of very flashy-looking images but no convincing data. I would be careful about investing in it.

    1. Re:EEG-based control is probably hype by sneekygeeky · · Score: 1

      Indeed it is muscle movements that control most of it. Here's the video of the product: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxMux4uEkLI The whole time I saw it, I couldn't stop thinking "God, if only the makers of stonehenge had had force powers..."

  61. Your emotions are already all over the Internet by patio11 · · Score: 1

    Who cares about the hookup to your face -- you type much, much more explicitly informative things every day, and then send it over the tubes. Granted, most of the emotions are of the sophomoric variety, but people have been leaking their emotional state over IM for the last few decades, and with some fairly trivial text processing you could discover it. (Start with just searching for smilies and emotional words, then level up to training Bayes-based classifiers -- if it works for telling what mails are spam, I bet it will tell you which Livejournals are emo.)

    Stub implementation:

    LiveJournal#isEmo() { return true;}

    See, 99% accurate with a single line of code.

  62. Patch notes 2.34 by Il128 · · Score: 1

    When zoning in to the community portal players should no longer experience uncontrolled explosive diarrhea. A small number of players were becoming comatose during the sleeper encounter, this bug should be fixed.

    --
    Thanks to eating disorders most chicks are reasonably good looking these days.
  63. Gel? Who needs it. by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

    These are gamers we're talking about. A greasy film of Cheetos grease should be sufficient.

  64. Birth Control Headset for Gamers! by Moonpie+Madness · · Score: 1

    'cause you sure aren't getting laid wearin' that!

  65. If used with a Google brain implant.... by vid88 · · Score: 1

    If this somehow gets tied in with a Google Brain Implant, and someone decided to scam/hack players..... total Epicness would ensue!

    Imagine that some player developed a scam similar to the Steam scam (The "Send me your user/pass and I'll unlock all the games for you" scam) and mentally posted a link online. All you would have to do is mentally post a message online and wait for some poor sap to Google/stumble across it. I'm sure that someone ::cough-noob-cough:: would be stupid enough to fall for it. Instead of scamming an account, you are effectively scamming their brain. Imagine the possibilities! :)
    Now if only someone would get brain implant technology to that point....

    "D00d, I juzt pwned yur brainz. LOL kthnxbai."

    Sorry if my thoughts are incoherent - I'm hungry. :(