The Republican spin machine will easily manipulate their "base" to not only accept it, but DEMAND that the big corp's profits are protected at the base's expense.
Let's face it, the electorate is informed by mass media and mass media is incompetent and in bed with their corporate masters.
You can't have it both ways. Either they're willful manipulators or incompetent buffoons, but not both. At the most they might be willful manipulators pretending to be incompetent buffoons, but that is not the same thing.
Fire ignition is not a consequence. Fire sustenance IS a consequence. Warmer temps, drier climate = fires that burn more land faster before they are brought under control. Which is what the article says.
It's become socially acceptable to hound someone out of a job for some political cause they supported 5+ years ago - how long until it's legally acceptable?
Which will show that you're a pretentious fuckwit?
They is the standard gender-neutral personal pronoun (as opposed to "it" the gender-neutral non-personal pronoun). People who insist on writing "he or she," "he/she," or any other stilted monstrosity are the linguistic equivalent of Kanye West--baselessly arrogant and pretentious.
That's because you're dumb enough to think that 80+miles of commuting is a sane way to live. It's not (and I was born and raised in LA and commuted 75 miles each way at one point--I can tell you from experience that it's not a sane way to live).
The key to reducing birth rates is raising the opportunity cost of children. First world countries have falling birth rates because women have other opportunities and the cost of raising 3+ kids (in terms of hours not worked for pay as much as actual outlays for food, clothes, etc.) is very high.
Letting $insert_disease_here maintain relatively high mortality rates ENCOURAGES birth rates because it increases poverty and so decreases the (opportunity) cost of having children.
Why not? The simplest method is to choose the collision with the lowest speed differential. In fact, this whole post is pointless. The self-driving car doesn't need to choose based on abstract concepts--choose the collision with the lowest speed differential. Lower speed differential means less energy transferred in the impact means less damage and less injuries. Moreover this is trivial for the cars to determine at this stage already. They can already calculate relative speeds between themselves and other objects, so if not all of the objects can be avoided, the choice is obvious.
The thing that is rote memorization is spelling, as the English language is not phonetic despite being taught that way
Not really. You can tell from the phonology of a word what language it comes from and once you know that the spelling is usually pretty regular. Almost every spelling irregularity in English is a result of the word's language of origin at the time it was borrowed.
Example: Words from French follow "i before e, except after c" (niece, achieve, ceiling, receipt, etc. are all from French) Words from Anglo-saxon do not (weird, neighbor, freight, eight, etc are all from Anglo-Saxon).
Slashdot Mirror
you, and they, are so morally bankrupt I can't understand how you can live with yourself.
I suspect that their moral bankruptcy has a lot to do with enabling them to live with their moral bankruptcy. It's a self-justifying sort of thing.
The Republican spin machine will easily manipulate their "base" to not only accept it, but DEMAND that the big corp's profits are protected at the base's expense.
Let's face it, the electorate is informed by mass media and mass media is incompetent and in bed with their corporate masters.
You can't have it both ways. Either they're willful manipulators or incompetent buffoons, but not both. At the most they might be willful manipulators pretending to be incompetent buffoons, but that is not the same thing.
Fire ignition is not a consequence. Fire sustenance IS a consequence. Warmer temps, drier climate = fires that burn more land faster before they are brought under control. Which is what the article says.
It's become socially acceptable to hound someone out of a job for some political cause they supported 5+ years ago - how long until it's legally acceptable?
Oh, rougly -70 years?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
None of this is new. American, Land of the free, has always been a convenient lie.
Same problem on the Nasdaq.
Shut the fuck up and go read a basic grammar text
Which will show that you're a pretentious fuckwit?
They is the standard gender-neutral personal pronoun (as opposed to "it" the gender-neutral non-personal pronoun). People who insist on writing "he or she," "he/she," or any other stilted monstrosity are the linguistic equivalent of Kanye West--baselessly arrogant and pretentious.
That's because you're dumb enough to think that 80+miles of commuting is a sane way to live. It's not (and I was born and raised in LA and commuted 75 miles each way at one point--I can tell you from experience that it's not a sane way to live).
M-x blow-me has always worked for me.
No, he wasn't saying that. You're projecting.
He simply stated the fact that there are cell phones in places without indoor plumbing. It wasn't a judgement. It was an observation.
Keep sucking that totalitarian cock.
Probably not the largest in terms of sheer numbers.
Just keep ignoring that loud wooshing sound over your head.
The key to reducing birth rates is raising the opportunity cost of children. First world countries have falling birth rates because women have other opportunities and the cost of raising 3+ kids (in terms of hours not worked for pay as much as actual outlays for food, clothes, etc.) is very high.
Letting $insert_disease_here maintain relatively high mortality rates ENCOURAGES birth rates because it increases poverty and so decreases the (opportunity) cost of having children.
. Here's the text of the speech from the horses mouth.
I believe you mean "the monkey's mouth."
The US manufactures more goods by dollar value than China. We just don't export them.
...and Godwinned. Thread over, time to go home.
Oh good, so he'd have been the same as Obama.
None of that changes the fact that the USPTO is incompetent and worthless.
Shoot the hostage.
Since when do trees move faster than children?
Why not? The simplest method is to choose the collision with the lowest speed differential. In fact, this whole post is pointless. The self-driving car doesn't need to choose based on abstract concepts--choose the collision with the lowest speed differential. Lower speed differential means less energy transferred in the impact means less damage and less injuries. Moreover this is trivial for the cars to determine at this stage already. They can already calculate relative speeds between themselves and other objects, so if not all of the objects can be avoided, the choice is obvious.
The thing that is rote memorization is spelling, as the English language is not phonetic despite being taught that way
Not really. You can tell from the phonology of a word what language it comes from and once you know that the spelling is usually pretty regular. Almost every spelling irregularity in English is a result of the word's language of origin at the time it was borrowed.
Example: Words from French follow "i before e, except after c" (niece, achieve, ceiling, receipt, etc. are all from French) Words from Anglo-saxon do not (weird, neighbor, freight, eight, etc are all from Anglo-Saxon).
Fine, -1 Arrested Development moderation option.
Or the front door in cases of "Pay to Win"
Sounds like an incredibly shitty game. I'm glad I never wasted time playing it.
More seriously, what you just described is not a game. It sounds more like a psychological torture device.