I choose to sleep under a hanging sword suspended by a single strand of horse hair. I closely monitored this sword, and have no detected any signs of it falling down and killing me in my sleep.
If you say this sword is going to fall and kill me in my sleep, give me a plausible method for how it would work.
You can borrow some items from my list: a. Secret Moonbase b. Underwater dome city c. My personal scramjet orbital-capable shuttle d. A modern pyramid for personal mausoleum e. Opening temples of Church of Spaghetti Monster across the nation.
/. isn't hip enough to attract younger crowd, and existing readership is getting older. People get curmudgeonly with age, and this is precisely what is happening here.
Expert judgement can be countered by other experts. Here we are being presented with something as a "Fact". There is no way to dispute it and there is no way to verify it which is what people are having a problem with.
Questioning expert's qualifications is fair game in trials. If you can demonstrate that expert is not impartial, you can largely mitigate their testimony.
How do you question algorithm like if (1) = Guilty; other than code review?
I think it is very reasonable to ask access, covered by NDA, to a source code when such code is used to produce results for criminal prosecution. Unless they can show independent third-party validation of their tool.
We have seen issues with red light cameras, we have seen issues with labs doing drug testing on hair, we have seen child abuse panics from psychology "experts". Both methods and experts have to be open for independent, impartial validation. Otherwise they are no better than a duck test.
ESRB is a industry self-regulatory organization. EA is part of it. Obviously, according to EA, EA is not engaging in predatory gambling targeted at minors.
Time to regulated the shit out of these c*%*$@&#$s.
"cure by beating his fucking brains out" is suggesting and/or calling for violence. Unless you can show me how you can beat someone's brains out in non-violent way.
You are cheering for this now, because it aligns with your values. However, such "weapon" should never be used or it will get used again, and maybe turned against you. What if FB, for example, start banning Ajax developers from their platform. They probably know that much about you. Say Zuck decided to do forceful deprecation of Ajax, like Jobs tried to do with Flash. I am sure someone out there can make a compelling argument how the web would be better if all Ajax developers were banned from everywhere, and their internet capped to 300 baud.
We are not quite there yet, but what are you going to do when businesses start operating on one of these platforms? Sure, you can try avoid using Google, unless your small-business email is run by them. Or what about Facebook, already I heard that Starbucks uses it to schedule shifts.
I think this particular problem is only going to get worse.
Not necessary, as it is city planners that decide priority for HOV lanes, but it is for-profit telecoms that would decide traffic priority for the last mile. One view is that lack of NN will lead to walled gardens - each ISP will turn into cable service, over data link with their own preset channels.
I like my Internet free, but recent article in The Atlantic made me second-guess this.
Key idea is as follows:
A public darling during the Obama years, when net neutrality won out, the tech industry has effectively become Big Tech, an aggressor industry along the lines of pharmaceuticals, oil, or tobacco. It’s true that one set of giant internet companies, like Comcast and Verizon, can’t currently mess with what people read, watch, and explore online. But another faction of giant internet companies can and do exert that power and control. Google, Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and others manage access to most of the content created and delivered via broadband and wireless networks.
Slashdot Mirror
How come the Andoid OS even allows a keyboard app access to stored data in the first place?
Because the user allowed it.
I choose to sleep under a hanging sword suspended by a single strand of horse hair. I closely monitored this sword, and have no detected any signs of it falling down and killing me in my sleep.
If you say this sword is going to fall and kill me in my sleep, give me a plausible method for how it would work.
What the hell would you actually buy with it?
Bill, you lack imagination.
You can borrow some items from my list:
a. Secret Moonbase
b. Underwater dome city
c. My personal scramjet orbital-capable shuttle
d. A modern pyramid for personal mausoleum
e. Opening temples of Church of Spaghetti Monster across the nation.
Does diversity results in better code? Please provide citations.
Wallstreet is upset that tech is cutting out the middle man and getting directly into reckless financial speculation game.
I am not an electrician, but would be curious to read your explanations of this.
Next thing you know you're working at Equifax and instead of installing security updates, you went golfing.
Damn it, they are onto me.
/. isn't hip enough to attract younger crowd, and existing readership is getting older. People get curmudgeonly with age, and this is precisely what is happening here.
Now get off my lawn!
For uninitiated, does it mean some of our KeyEx methods that rely on factorization are about to get broken?
Expert judgement can be countered by other experts. Here we are being presented with something as a "Fact". There is no way to dispute it and there is no way to verify it which is what people are having a problem with.
Questioning expert's qualifications is fair game in trials. If you can demonstrate that expert is not impartial, you can largely mitigate their testimony.
How do you question algorithm like if (1) = Guilty; other than code review?
I think it is very reasonable to ask access, covered by NDA, to a source code when such code is used to produce results for criminal prosecution. Unless they can show independent third-party validation of their tool.
We have seen issues with red light cameras, we have seen issues with labs doing drug testing on hair, we have seen child abuse panics from psychology "experts". Both methods and experts have to be open for independent, impartial validation. Otherwise they are no better than a duck test.
Your honor, obviously axlash is premeditated and conspired to commit crime, as he refused to carry his smartphone with him on the day of the event.
ESRB is a industry self-regulatory organization. EA is part of it. Obviously, according to EA, EA is not engaging in predatory gambling targeted at minors.
Time to regulated the shit out of these c*%*$@&#$s.
"cure by beating his fucking brains out" is suggesting and/or calling for violence. Unless you can show me how you can beat someone's brains out in non-violent way.
Yes, I want you to explain your behavior, and why you though it was a good idea to suggest violence.
Forget Cloudfare, just nationalize all the porn hosted on it.
You are cheering for this now, because it aligns with your values. However, such "weapon" should never be used or it will get used again, and maybe turned against you. What if FB, for example, start banning Ajax developers from their platform. They probably know that much about you. Say Zuck decided to do forceful deprecation of Ajax, like Jobs tried to do with Flash. I am sure someone out there can make a compelling argument how the web would be better if all Ajax developers were banned from everywhere, and their internet capped to 300 baud.
We are not quite there yet, but what are you going to do when businesses start operating on one of these platforms? Sure, you can try avoid using Google, unless your small-business email is run by them. Or what about Facebook, already I heard that Starbucks uses it to schedule shifts.
I think this particular problem is only going to get worse.
Let's just agree on "A speed slow enough to do the TCP handshake with actual hands".
I don't have enough hands for a three-way handshake.
You are not helping, but actually harming the NN cause with your post. It is easy to point at your idiotic behavior and generalize.
Not necessary, as it is city planners that decide priority for HOV lanes, but it is for-profit telecoms that would decide traffic priority for the last mile. One view is that lack of NN will lead to walled gardens - each ISP will turn into cable service, over data link with their own preset channels.
Key idea is as follows:
In Ajit's case FCC chairman is clearly a disability, and thus a protected status.
Sprints will continue until developer morale improves!