Given the fact that you'd need to understand what a "web browser" is before being able to make a decent choice here, that behaviour is acceptable. IE8 is decent enough, gets updated automatically and should be a good choice for all those that don't understand what a browser is.
Those that do shouldn't have the slightest problem installing an application.
OEM licenses are not allowed to be transferred to another machine. As such, they will need to buy a new one when they buy a new laptop.
The Full Package Product, which is quite a bit more expensive than the OEM licenses can of course be transferred from machine-to-machine as many times as you want.
The difference is between the interfaces available, the languages supported by the device and most importantly the duty cycle for the device per the manufacturer.
I think the main point here would be "professional" - in exchange against money. It looks like this was just volunteer work, with no contract or procedures.
Don't you mean "which not one of the competitors NEED"
It's a passive security feature that's actually a good idea. There are lots of Firefox security issues and even more issues if you count usual browser plugins like Flash and Acrobat Reader.
ASLR, Internet Explorer's Protected stuff (which not one of the competitors has), Bitlocker, the new Firewall (which finally has a nice group policy settings), service hardening using restricted accounts, NAP inclusion, kernel patch protection, etc. etc.
I'm sorry, i don't see anything wrong with those prices. We charge hourly, and not per specific work done, but i can't see my company being cheaper than those prices, especially if you consider the enormous expense of actually driving to the customers location.
Yeah, but it will quickly need more than that.
The new servicing stack in Vista/7 has lots of advantages, but it also eats hard disk space for breakfast.
A non-issue in my opinion, since even our el-cheapo Lenovo ThinkCentre desktops ship with 320GB hard drives.
Enterprise == Ultimate (that was different in Vista, Enterprise didn't have the media center)
Differences between Enteprise and Ultimate is the licensing channel and the default activation method.
Windows Vista and up automatically checks the SMART data for you and will display a warning to the user in case SMART data reports critical status.
I've found SMART to be almost useless, though. But that's another story.
Apple apparently signed that contract with AT&T, so trashing them seems to be in order.
Not pornographic websites, just websites that contain child pornography.
You know - instead of taking them down by putting those responsible for creating and publishing the child porn in jail.
Much cheaper this way. And less work for the police, too! Saves taxes!
Given the fact that you'd need to understand what a "web browser" is before being able to make a decent choice here, that behaviour is acceptable. IE8 is decent enough, gets updated automatically and should be a good choice for all those that don't understand what a browser is.
Those that do shouldn't have the slightest problem installing an application.
Correct, it's even on a variety of MS Blogs. Those who ordered the E versions get the _full_ version of the normal version.
Yeah, same here. Usually, Firefox sits between 200 - 300 MB of memory usage. Out of 6GB on my desktop or 4GB on my laptop, that seems okay.
So you don't see people without a job and no interest of getting one as a problem? What's the government doing wrong then, in your opinion?
Should we give them more money? Less money? No money?
Read what i wrote - "Chavs living on the dole are".
So, if you have a little reading comprehension, you'll see that i don't think that Chavs in general are the problem.
That's Vista's OEM preactivation. It's completely different from activation with the key provided on the COA.
Most machines ship with a key on the COA - which is unused, and instead the preinstalled image is preactivated using OEM SLP preactivation.
OEM licenses are not allowed to be transferred to another machine. As such, they will need to buy a new one when they buy a new laptop.
The Full Package Product, which is quite a bit more expensive than the OEM licenses can of course be transferred from machine-to-machine as many times as you want.
Err, no. Working class isn't a problem. Chavs living on the dole are.
Except Bitlocker, which utilizes the TPM.
So how does that exception work with Java GPLd java applications?
Many OS do not ship with Java.
And if you want them to continue running, you'll have to clean the print head from time to time.
The difference is between the interfaces available, the languages supported by the device and most importantly the duty cycle for the device per the manufacturer.
I think the main point here would be "professional" - in exchange against money. It looks like this was just volunteer work, with no contract or procedures.
It's a passive security feature that's actually a good idea. There are lots of Firefox security issues and even more issues if you count usual browser plugins like Flash and Acrobat Reader.
They probably don't have access to the RTM yet. Like most law-abiding citizens ;)
Actually, no.
ASLR, Internet Explorer's Protected stuff (which not one of the competitors has), Bitlocker, the new Firewall (which finally has a nice group policy settings), service hardening using restricted accounts, NAP inclusion, kernel patch protection, etc. etc.
Someone in a university gets _TRAUMATIZED_ from seeing someone masturbating?
Have they been living in a fucking cave?
That's why you have an internal PKI with internal certificates. Problem solved.
The data will be downloaded using an Excel plugin into Excel, decrypted, and then queries will be done using Excel.
This way, you get all the advantages of cloud storage, plus the easy usability of Excel.
I'm sorry, i don't see anything wrong with those prices. We charge hourly, and not per specific work done, but i can't see my company being cheaper than those prices, especially if you consider the enormous expense of actually driving to the customers location.