So he wants to keep his children away from it and likes to keep it a secret, but he doesn't mind exploiting other peoples children (aka, "barely legal/18" "youthful models")? He makes these girls look younger than 18? Why even have a family? Why stay with his wife and daughter? Maybe he wants to bring her into the business when she becomes "barely legal". "Everyone thinks we're all involved in every dirty piece of the business. It's really not like that." That's basically like a general telling his troops to go attack a village - he's not actually going into the battle and slaughtering people himself, he just puts out the order, his hands are clean. "Our goal was to make a little extra money for our kids' college fund." So exploit a young college girl whose father is trying to put through college so you can pay for your daughter to go to college? Any chance of a repeating cycle there? I've heard that what goes around comes around, and it may prove true in this case - though I doubt that he will object, as I said he's probably setting her up for a career in it as well. Why have his daughter go to college? So she doesn't have to resort to porn? So why help another college girl resort to porn? A master of hypocrisy he is. Interesting that his mother works for him - that says a LOT. Poor man, he never decided to break the cycle. He has sold his soul to his studity, so naive of the consequences that will follow.
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, Steve.
I would never get On Star. I swear it's so easy to see what is happening here. They're introducing all of this monitoring technology as an option and most people accept it not looking ahead to what it will lead to....they're eventually going to put forward a plan to chip people. They won't force it, but they will require it and those who don't will face consequences - like deportation, imprisonment, or internment camps or something. Not under these conditions, though. More will have to happen to bring security even more to the forefront. People will give up their rights for this kind of garbage. Garbage doesn't even begin to describe it.
To stop it from progressing to that point there needs to be a large, publicized lawsuit. I'm more than certain all that is happening is an attempt to change mind-sets to accept this kind of stuff. Were people ready and willing right now they would already be pushing full force with chipping them.
On Star is pretty worthless too. A friend of mine who has it got a flat tire outside of her city and hit the On Star button and it did nothing. They also pointed out that it looks like the only people who like it are the ones on the commercials - and they're probably actors.
Reminds me of cellphones in emergency situations - just look what happened during Katrina and the recent London bombing. Cell phone service was GONE!
It's not wise to make the mistake of relying so much on this kind of technology.
Slashdot Mirror
So he wants to keep his children away from it and likes to keep it a secret, but he doesn't mind exploiting other peoples children (aka, "barely legal/18" "youthful models")? He makes these girls look younger than 18? Why even have a family? Why stay with his wife and daughter? Maybe he wants to bring her into the business when she becomes "barely legal". "Everyone thinks we're all involved in every dirty piece of the business. It's really not like that." That's basically like a general telling his troops to go attack a village - he's not actually going into the battle and slaughtering people himself, he just puts out the order, his hands are clean. "Our goal was to make a little extra money for our kids' college fund." So exploit a young college girl whose father is trying to put through college so you can pay for your daughter to go to college? Any chance of a repeating cycle there? I've heard that what goes around comes around, and it may prove true in this case - though I doubt that he will object, as I said he's probably setting her up for a career in it as well. Why have his daughter go to college? So she doesn't have to resort to porn? So why help another college girl resort to porn? A master of hypocrisy he is. Interesting that his mother works for him - that says a LOT. Poor man, he never decided to break the cycle. He has sold his soul to his studity, so naive of the consequences that will follow. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, Steve.
I would never get On Star. I swear it's so easy to see what is happening here. They're introducing all of this monitoring technology as an option and most people accept it not looking ahead to what it will lead to. ...they're eventually going to put forward a plan to chip people. They won't force it, but they will require it and those who don't will face consequences - like deportation, imprisonment, or internment camps or something. Not under these conditions, though. More will have to happen to bring security even more to the forefront. People will give up their rights for this kind of garbage. Garbage doesn't even begin to describe it.
To stop it from progressing to that point there needs to be a large, publicized lawsuit. I'm more than certain all that is happening is an attempt to change mind-sets to accept this kind of stuff. Were people ready and willing right now they would already be pushing full force with chipping them.
On Star is pretty worthless too. A friend of mine who has it got a flat tire outside of her city and hit the On Star button and it did nothing. They also pointed out that it looks like the only people who like it are the ones on the commercials - and they're probably actors.
Reminds me of cellphones in emergency situations - just look what happened during Katrina and the recent London bombing. Cell phone service was GONE!
It's not wise to make the mistake of relying so much on this kind of technology.