Slashdot Mirror


The Man Behind Online Porn's 'Steve Lightspeed'

Carl Bialik from WSJ writes "'In the online pornography business, just about everybody has heard of Steve Lightspeed,' who runs a network of sites, reports the Wall Street Journal Online. 'But few in the porn world know much about Steve Jones, the 39-year-old married father of two behind the Lightspeed persona -- and that's the way he wants to keep it.' In WSJ.com's profile of Jones, tension between his job and the rest of his life is evident: 'He said he and his wife mostly socialize with others inside the porn business, in part because it avoids the awkwardness of explaining his line of work. "Most of our friends tend to be in the industry," he said. Relationships with family members can also be tricky. Mr. Jones's mother works for Lightspeed Media, handling customer service duties, but he said some relatives don't know about his work and likely wouldn't approve.'"

246 comments

  1. Slashdot by Metabolife · · Score: 3, Funny

    'But few in the porn world know much about Steve Jones, the 39-year-old married father of two behind the Lightspeed persona -- and that's the way he wants to keep it.' I hear slashdot is a great place for a porn king to be noticed.

    1. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I hear slashdot is a great place for a porn king to be noticed.

      Yes, quite unlike the Wall Street Journal.

    2. Re:Slashdot by Zone-MR · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Combined with Google, yes.
      "But few in the porn world know much about Steve Jones, the 39-year-old married father of two behind the Lightspeed persona -- and that's the way he wants to keep it".

      Some relatives don't know about his work and likely wouldn't approve.

      Except shortly everyone Googling for his name will know who he is and what industry he works in. Nice responsible journalism. Why not ruin someone's life so you can write an interesting article.
      "A few years ago, Mr. Jones relocated his family after some neighbors learned of his profession, and forbade their children from playing with his. "It was kind of heartbreaking," Mr. Jones said. He added: "My kids have no clue what we do."

      The media stooped lower than usual this time. The least they could have done was shown some slight respect for the guy and his kids, and obscured the names.
    3. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm sure "Steve Jones" is his real name and is uncommon enough that Googling would just pull him up ;-)

    4. Re:Slashdot by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wouldn't know, I only read the Wall Steet Journal for the articles...

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    5. Re:Slashdot by TheLongshot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As the article says, his real name is all over the internet anyways, so this doesn't change anything.

      There is no mention of his wife's or his kids' names anywhere in the article, and having a last name of "Jones" is innocuous enough.

    6. Re:Slashdot by re-Verse · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno.. last name Jones. Isn't that about as close to John Doe as you can get? In fact, Jones often means "the person next door", keeping up with the Jonses, etc. I'm guessing its not his real last name.

      I guess in this case, "keeping up with the jonses" would have a whole new meaning eh?

    7. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they did obscure the names, but just didn't say that they did so.

      Or are you such a big customer of Mr. Jones that you know him personally? ;-)

    8. Re:Slashdot by slashrogue · · Score: 1

      The article doesn't say so, but "Jones" could easily be a pseudonym. Not to mention finding a "Steve Jones" is probably going to turn up hundreds, if not thousands, of hits.

    9. Re:Slashdot by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of people named "Steve Jones".

      This particular one doesn't even show up in the first several pages of Google

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    10. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "A few years ago, Mr. Jones relocated his family after some neighbors learned of his profession, and forbade their children from playing with his. "It was kind of heartbreaking," Mr. Jones said. He added: "My kids have no clue what we do."

      I can't belive how hypocritical people can be. What do you want to bet that the same dad that didn't let his children play with Mr. Jone's kids could be found surfing his sites after the kids were in bed?

      I am one of those "neocon" republicans that everyone here hates (hence the annymous post), and I feel I maintain high moral standards. I would have no problem living next door to Mr. Jones, letting my kids play with his, inviting them over to BBQ ect. Any Christian that would segregate themselves and their family from their neighbors should study the life of Christ a bit more.

    11. Re:Slashdot by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2

      "A few years ago, Mr. Jones relocated his family after some neighbors learned of his profession, and forbade their children from playing with his. "

      Yep, he should have gave his neighbors the free month pass like they wanted - this could have all been avoided.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    12. Re:Slashdot by Caiwyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At first I had the same reaction, until I realized that the man would have had to agree to an interview with the Wall Street Journal. If he's really interested in keeping his privacy, why is he fielding questions about his work?

    13. Re:Slashdot by AoT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except shortly everyone Googling for his name will know who he is and what industry he works in. Nice responsible journalism. Why not ruin someone's life so you can write an interesting article.

      Boo-fucking-hoo!

      He's a pornographer. If he has a problem with his friends and family knowing that, maybe he should work in that field. This is as absurd as some guy driving race cars being terribly secretive about his job because all his family rides bikes.

    14. Re:Slashdot by AoT · · Score: 2, Funny

      maybe he should work in that field.

      Or shouldn't work in that field even.

    15. Re:Slashdot by dsgitl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am one of those "neocon" republicans that everyone here hates... Any Christian that would segregate themselves and their family from their neighbors should study the life of Christ a bit more

      Are you SURE you're one of those Republicans? I didn't think treating people like equals was allowed. Maybe you've got the wrong Christ or something. The Republican Christ seems to love segregating people, ideas, and countries. Not to mention the whole warring/conquering nation thing.

    16. Re:Slashdot by electroniceric · · Score: 1
      The media stooped lower than usual this time. The least they could have done was shown some slight respect for the guy and his kids, and obscured the names.
      There's probably a backstory in itself there. Did the report actually talk to him? If so, how did Mr. Lightspeed expect to be portrayed vs. what happened?

      That said, I really don't feel that bad for the guy, nor do I think the WSJ wrote anything terribly out of bounds. They didn't name his kids, pass along rumors or unsubstantiated remarks, insinuate that he has personality defects, carry on about how sleazy the industry is, etc. The story was about the guy, his company, and his ambivalence about revealing his job. It's the media's job to report what's going on, not to tiptoe around someone's reputation. If he really feels that bad about the reputation of the industry he's in, he can cash out and do something else. If somebody founded a vastly successful manure-hauling company that managed to attract a bunch of customers because of clever composting or something like that, wouldn't you expect the media to write about the phenomenon and use a person to illustrate the industry, even if the guy became know as Mr. Manure (sorry ladies,no manure for you all).
    17. Re:Slashdot by l0g1c · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Steve Jones is very blatantly a fake name, it even states that in TFA. However, it also stated that his Wikipedia entry revealed his true name - which, upon inspection, is no longer there. Two changes were made to his entry today, but whether or not those changes removed his name is unknown. I don't think the WSJ has done anything wrong in writing this article, and I'm sure "Mr. Jones" has at least taking some precautions to hiding his true identity. Saying that the WSJ has "ruined his credibility and his life" is more than a little extreme.

    18. Re:Slashdot by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      As another poster pointed out, that's one of the perks of having a very common name. Googling reveals almost nothing about you.

      As far as the WSJ is concerned, I'd guess they asked him if they could print his real name. I don't think this guy is exactly naive when it comes to the media, so if he wasn't comfortable with his name getting out in a more public way I doubt he'd have done the interview. He's already become somewhat of a public figure, so it's really not analogous to publishing the names of (for instance) rape victims.

      That's not to say the media isn't a bunch of scumbags that'll ruin someones life for a dollar. The worst example of this I can remember is when various Chicago newspapers published the name (and was it even the address?!) of the guy who "lost" a baseball playoff game by catching a foul ball or whatever he did wrong.

      --
      AccountKiller
    19. Re:Slashdot by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      He works in the industry...what did he expect. I dont want my family to think I am a drug dealer, so I dont deal drugs.

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    20. Re:Slashdot by iwsnet · · Score: 0

      I've never heard of this guy before. Thanks to the WSJ for profiling him.

    21. Re:Slashdot by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I agree with the other guy who replied to this post. You're not much of a Neocon if you have no problems letting your kids play with Mr. Jones's.

      If more Republicans were like you, we probably wouldn't have so many people complaining about them.

    22. Re:Slashdot by AgentFade2Black · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that counts as "not obscuring." They didn't name his town or city, did they? Only if you really know the man himself, can you place him. (Without intensive search, of course.)

    23. Re:Slashdot by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Add "Lightspeed" and "porn" to the search string and he comes up immediately. The name as connected to porn is widely used, appearing in articles in AVN and numerous times on porn Web sitemaster boards.

      But, yet, just plain "Steve Jones" gets you nothing useful as one would expect. It'd be like asking for "John Smith".

      In fact, the Sex Pistols Steve Jones comes up a lot.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    24. Re:Slashdot by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      If he is so shy of his job, he should change it and do some other business.

      The problem is that WSJ is interested in advertisement of itself and sometimes it resorts to tickling the lowest common denominator that is between legs of any adult human being.

      The "businessman" being sheepishly advertised in WSJ is interested in this advertisement as well. There is no such thing as bad publicity. And if he wants more privacy he can change his real name legally.

      People excuse their interest in lowly and demeaning matter by the fact that, well, it is a common human denominator.

      Well, learn this: it is not what is common between humans and animals that makes us humans.

      A personality is defined not by what comes to his mind, but what comes to his mind, gets rejected in his mind by the moral criteria and never comes out in the form of action.

      In other words, a human being is defined not but the things he or she does, but rather by things he and she does not do, never, under no circumstances without exceptions.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    25. Re:Slashdot by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      The couple also don't tell others in their posh Phoenix neighborhood what they do...

      How come everyone always lives in a posh neighborhood?

      Am I the only person who lives in a regular neighborhood????? Anyway, anyone who gets kicked out of college for tutoring a female student is OK with me.

      [The Carlyle Group's economic modeling suggests the US economy will collapse if it pulls out of the Iraqi War.]

    26. Re:Slashdot by KermitJunior · · Score: 1

      Wait... there are ARTICLES in the WSJ?

      --
      There is a Universal Life Value Check it
    27. Re:Slashdot by birge · · Score: 1

      I suppose I see the point of blaming the media for going too far. But I have no respect for some get rich quick asshole who's own choice of profession screws over his kids and then says "I have no idea what to do." What a dick. He could quit while he's a millionaire and give his kids a normal life. Jeez.

    28. Re:Slashdot by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      I don't see your point. If the bike riders disapprove of him racing cars, why are his only options telling them, or finding other work?

    29. Re:Slashdot by bhiestand · · Score: 1
      Well, learn this: it is not what is common between humans and animals that makes us humans.

      A personality is defined not by what comes to his mind, but what comes to his mind, gets rejected in his mind by the moral criteria and never comes out in the form of action.

      In other words, a human being is defined not but the things he or she does, but rather by things he and she does not do, never, under no circumstances without exceptions.

      Damn, I always thought it had something to do with our ability to our ability to communicate complex ideas through language, coordinate with eachother, build tools, and alter our environment instead of adapting to it! And I was sure people were defined (and remembered) for their great accomplishments...

      I really don't know what the problem is against porn. It's not evil, demeaning, or harmful any more than any other activity we engage in. The people I know who work in the industry thoroughly enjoy their jobs. I don't see how it's any different from getting paid to eat. Unless you're one of those crazy people who sees heterosexual sex as an unnatural thing, in which case I can't help you.
      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    30. Re:Slashdot by aapold · · Score: 1

      So instead of ruining one man's life, they can ruin dozens. Every person named Steve Jones who has two kids and doesn't talk about what he does is now a possible lightspeed.

      --
      "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
    31. Re:Slashdot by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Viewing porn falls into the same category as substance abuse or, generally, bad habits. Porn helps to develop bad habits that undermine functioning of a human.

      Stop doing what you do with porn and you will discover in yourself amazing potential for becoming a better human being.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    32. Re:Slashdot by AgentFade2Black · · Score: 1

      "He could quit while he's a millionaire and give his kids a normal life. Jeez." That's a no-can-do for him. He's been branded with the identity of "Steve Lightspeed" forever. He's screwed now.

  2. pr0n... the $14 billion business by xtal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..nobody seems to know anything about

    --
    ..don't panic
    1. Re:pr0n... the $14 billion business by Billosaur · · Score: 1
      ..nobody seems to know anything about

      But thanks to Google and other search engines, very easy to find... which makes you wonder when Google going to buy this guy out.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    2. Re:pr0n... the $14 billion business by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      I thought you can learn everything from watching Seymore Butts. Uh, no?

    3. Re:pr0n... the $14 billion business by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Except for maybe the hundreds of thousands of people who tell thier wives that they are going to the CES show in Las Vegas every year.

    4. Re:pr0n... the $14 billion business by StarvingSE · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can see it now... pr0n.google.com

      beta of course

      --
      I got nothin'
    5. Re:pr0n... the $14 billion business by British · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the article's header it mentioned Lightspeed's mom working in the same place. Seymour Butts' mother also works for the same pr0n company Seymour is in charge of. Heck, a reality show was made about it(Family Business)

    6. Re:pr0n... the $14 billion business by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      Working on it... I expect them to buy me out any day now.

  3. Wall Street Journal by geeber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cool. The Wall Street Journal is submitting their own articles to Slashdot now. Nothing like a little free advertising.

    1. Re:Wall Street Journal by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      Yea what is up with that? It is almost as bad as that guy who would post his own blog which linked off to the actual stories just so he could get ad revenue.

    2. Re:Wall Street Journal by geeber · · Score: 1

      Yea what is up with that? It is almost as bad as that guy who would post his own blog which linked off to the actual stories just so he could get ad revenue.

      Of course they could just think that, for some reason, the Slashdot community would be interested in pr0n.

    3. Re:Wall Street Journal by Mach5 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Slashdot doesn't have to publish the story if they don't want to. The article is interesting, and relevant to the site. If it came from Joe Whogivesafuck, or the author, who cares? What real difference does it make?

      --
      - my userid is lower than yours
    4. Re:Wall Street Journal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no! that can't be it.

    5. Re:Wall Street Journal by Bromskloss · · Score: 1
      It is almost as bad as that guy who would post his own blog which linked off to the actual stories just so he could get ad revenue.
      Or editors accepting the submission...
      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    6. Re:Wall Street Journal by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 2, Funny

      The little guy needs to get noticed somehow. Once the Washington Post starts getting their stories on here, that's when to get worried though.

    7. Re:Wall Street Journal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm...beatles-beatles must not have been available.

    8. Re:Wall Street Journal by will_die · · Score: 1

      For the rare occurance this is an example when it is done right.
      /. gets a lot of articles submitted by the author, just trace the name back to the owner then compare it to the name of the author. However here we have a straight forward name linking indicating that it is from the WSJ and then the e-mail link is existing and points to the correct person.
      Finally to top it off it was computer relavent and actually a kind of interesting article; which most of theses submit articles are not.

  4. If this is the guy from Lightspeed University.... by HaloZero · · Score: 1

    ...which it'd be hard to assume it isn't, then sir, I owe you a drink.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
  5. P0rn News by run4ever79 · · Score: 4, Funny

    now there's some news for nerds.

    --
    Linux : Hotrod :: Windows : Yugo
  6. Obligatory Futurama-quote by October_30th · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Lightspeed fits today's active life style, whether you're on the job or having fun. Lightspeed Briefs - style and comfort for the discriminating crotch."

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  7. I can just imagine... by pedalman · · Score: 2, Funny
    What it is like for the kids when asked to tell the class what Daddy does for a living:

    "Uhh, he brings much joy to Slashdotters around the world."

    --
    Friends don't let friends line-dance.
    1. Re:I can just imagine... by oahazmatt · · Score: 1

      I'm just worried about "Bring your child to work day".

      --
      Those who believe the Internet is private,
      find their privates are on the Internet.
    2. Re:I can just imagine... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      I guess they are inferring that DefSec Donald Rumsfeld is proud to have his children tell people what he does for a living? I would think they would be ashamed, assuming he has actually spawned....

  8. Re:If this is the guy from Lightspeed University.. by BlueCup · · Score: 1

    Indeed. This man is a hero.

    --
    WANNAWIKI Wannawiki WannaWiki WANNAWIKI!
  9. This is news? by TheLinuxSRC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am unsure as to why this is news. Subject X works in the Y industry, an industry not looked upon with great respect by a majority of the public. Because of this X does not want his family to know he works in the Y industry and generally associates with people from the Y industry so as to avoid embarassment due to his profession.

    1. Re:This is news? by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yah, I don't want my family to know I work with computers either. In order to avoid the embarrasment, I tell them I'm a piano player at a brothel.

    2. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:This is news? by pizzaman100 · · Score: 1
      What about his wife? The article doesn't say much other than she runs the company books.

      I don't know about most others, but it would not be a happy conversation for me if I told the MRS. that I was 'an avid viewer of porn', and wanted to start photo-shooting models and making a career out of it.

    4. Re:This is news? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you love your wife and all and perhaps get along with her fine, but why would you marry someone without sharing something so vital with her, in that you are into porn? Don't you think thats something she deserves to know and likewise don't you deserve a spouse who wouldn't judge you negatively on that?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    5. Re:This is news? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      If only I had been that wise. Can you imagine it- no more tech support phone calls from family!

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    6. Re:This is news? by pizzaman100 · · Score: 1

      What's surprising is that his wife (and his mother for that matter) support running such a business that is so stimatizing. The fact that they are okay with it is surprising to me. That's all.

      And, you're making uninformed assumptions about my relationship with the Mrs.

    7. Re:This is news? by ottothecow · · Score: 1

      yeah, but then all of the creepy uncles would be calling you for...other reasons

      --
      Bottles.
    8. Re:This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure I'd want to involve my mother, but I know my wife doesn't care about me viewing porn, and if we could build a highly profitable business in it, I think she'd be all for it.

      After all, what's the problem?

    9. Re:This is news? by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

      You and Jelly Roll Morton....oh wait... he wasn't ashamed.

      --
      Libertas in infinitum
  10. Click here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know you want google to always remember you searched for Tawnee Stone. How old is she now, like, 25?

    1. Re:Click here by DancesWithBlowTorch · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You know, I love how, following your link, Google tells me
      Results 1-20 of about 299 for tawnee stone (0.15 seconds)
      Then, I see this little blue link at the top. "Moderate Safe Search is on". So I switch it off. Ergo:
      Results 1-20 of about 32,500 for tawnee stone (0.06 seconds)
      Maybe I should try that trick with my own name once in a while...
    2. Re:Click here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tawnee is fugly. Go look for Sweet Devon instead.

    3. Re:Click here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jordan Capri is my fav.

    4. Re:Click here by msouth · · Score: 1

      Heh--speaking of googling names, my name is Mike South. I was starting the interview process with a well respected member of the perl community. The first thing he says in the phone screen is something like "you might have mentioned to me about the _other_ Mike South before I started googling for you...".

      --
      Liberty uber alles.
    5. Re:Click here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tawnee is fugly. Go look for Sweet Devon instead.

      This comment brought to you by Sweet Devon.

    6. Re:Click here by Yaleman · · Score: 1

      Going by her Wikipedia page she's about 24 actually :)

      --
      Life is a window... It just depends on what side you choose to be on...
  11. Slashdot can keep a secret! by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    "But few in the porn world know much about Steve Jones, the 39-year-old married father of two behind the Lightspeed persona -- and that's the way he wants to keep it."

    Have no worries, your secrets are safe with us.

    1. Re:Slashdot can keep a secret! by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      What information do you really have? Steve Jones. Fairly generic American names. My wager is, if you were really that interested, you could narrow it down to a few people. But there has to be more than one guy with such a generic name who is 39 years old and married with two kids. Knowing the /. crowd, though, someone's going to go googling, find this guy's home address and telephone number, and post it in a comment. It might end up that those aren't even his real names, and just a pseudonym. Such is the price of infamy.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    2. Re:Slashdot can keep a secret! by CranberryKing · · Score: 1

      NEWSFLASH: "We've just discovered that publishing a story about the private life of [VICTEM] will ruin their life. Interestingly [VICTEM] is trying to avoid such attention and having their life ruined. We'll bring more details as the story develops. Our helicopters are now outside [VICTEM]'s home." Thank God for the press to keep us all informed about the news that matters.

    3. Re:Slashdot can keep a secret! by Widowwolf · · Score: 1

      I hate grammer nazi's, but come on people really easy to type up your comments in Word or notepad or document maker of your choice, do a spelling check at least and then paste them into The Slash. Victim is spelled wrong every time..Use a little common sense

      --
      ~~"Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~~Dennis Miller
    4. Re:Slashdot can keep a secret! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Grammer nazi's"? In just two words you've made three mistakes (grammar is mispelled and Nazis should be capitalized and have no apostrophe). Perhaps you should take your own advice. No comment on the other mistakes.

    5. Re:Slashdot can keep a secret! by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      "Grammer nazi's"? In just two words you've made three mistakes (grammar is mispelled and Nazis should be capitalized and have no apostrophe). Perhaps you should take your own advice. No comment on the other mistakes.

      HEY, WE ARE ALL VICTEMS of the Grammer Nazi's here, you insensitive clod !

      --
      music lover since 1969
    6. Re:Slashdot can keep a secret! by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 1
      I don't think it's us he has to worry about...

      "The Steve Lightspeed character is a little bigger than life," said Mr. Jones, who often sports a baseball jersey emblazoned with "Lightspeed" in capital letters. "I heard people say we once raced helicopters down the Las Vegas strip."

      Way to keep it on the down-low, dude.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
    7. Re:Slashdot can keep a secret! by Valafar · · Score: 1

      I cannot believe how often this sort of thing happens.

      "Grammar" not "Gammer".

    8. Re:Slashdot can keep a secret! by Valafar · · Score: 1

      See! I even did it to myself! /s/Gammer/Grammer

  12. Well, I have to say ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... but he said some relatives don't know about his work ...

    They do now.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Well, I have to say ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you are thinking of the other Steve Jones.

      Security through obscurity isn't reliable but it does work to a certian extent. with a fairly ordinary name like Steve Jones he should be able to
      If he wants to keep his work secret he can probably maintain the illusion a while longer.

  13. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not at all clear why this is a story for Slashdot.

    Having an successful Internet business doesn't make an interesting in and of itself.

    Is this supposed to make those of us not in the porn business feel grateful that we don't have his problems?

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this supposed to make those of us not in the porn business feel grateful that we don't have his problems?

      Yeah, that poor bastard. Thank God I don't have to only socialize with porn stars and other people in the adult industry. What a drag that would be!

      Oh, crap. I forgot to turn off my sarcasm detector before typing this post, and it just blew up.

    2. Re:Why? by freeweed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Having an successful Internet business doesn't make an interesting in and of itself.

      No, but having a successful Internet business in an industry that is used by millions of people daily, perfectly legal, and yet the guy still has to hide what he does IS interesting.

      Hence, "YRO".

      I think it's a very interesting comment on our society (at least, American society). Even with no government censorship, the societal sanctions we impose on others have a great deal of influence. Parents won't let their kids play with his kids? What do they think Mr. Lightspeed does - porn films displayed 7x24 in his home? I guess they also figure someone who works for a gun manufacturer uses his kids as target practice...

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  14. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Jones, the 39-year-old married father of two behind the Lightspeed persona -- and that's the way he wants to keep it

    So now they did told us his real name... well here is my piece of mind:

    I really envy Steve Jones for having that cool job!

    There.. Wallstreet.. no go and whinge somewhere else... Maybe on some christian board or such... BTW.. aren't christians those who makes holes into their condoms?

    1. Re:WTF? by utlemming · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why? I wouldn't want his job or any job like it. The guy has a job that carries social stigmas. FTA, he said that he had to move his family when peopel found out about his job, and he generally only associates with people that are in the business. Sure he may get to look at porn, but when he has practically isolated himself and his family from the real world is it really worth it? In fact his daughters have no clue what their Dad does. Why on earth would you want to work in an industry that carries such a cost? Sure he may be financially secure, but sometimes the costs of wealth are too much.

      The other thing that really made me wonder is that Mr. Jones shields his daughters from his business. It makes me wonder why he shields them? What exactly does that mean?

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    2. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why on earth would you want to work in an industry that carries such a cost?

      Because I, seriously, like hookers better than the opinions of strangers.

    3. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why? I wouldn't want his job or any job like it.

      For the money, obviously!
      You should be happy that someone is willing to provide the porn that you regularly jerk off to.

    4. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It means that porn, while an acceptable entertainment for adults, is not something you expose your nine year old daughter to. That's all.

    5. Re:WTF? by skintigh2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't want his job for even more basic reasons than that:
      He works 12 hour days
      7 days a week
      travels often
      and isn't even rich.

      I also hear about young lawyers and doctors making well over 6 figures but I'm not jealous of them, either, because when you divide their salary by the 100 hours a week they work I'm making a lot more than them AND I have time to enjoy it.

      But back to the other guy, it would be nice to be surrounded by nude models all the time...

    6. Re:WTF? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But back to the other guy, it would be nice to be surrounded by nude models all the time...

      Yeah, you'd think so but really, after a while they all blend together and the enjoyment ceases.

      I'm saying this not as someone who works in the industry but rather from every story I've ever read written about people in the industry (the adult industry as a whole, not just online). To a one they all say the same thing: it's just a job.

      Sure, looking at cute/hot girls seems like it would be great. They come in and you get look them up and down without fear of them calling the cops on you. But you're not looking at them and imagining all the lascivious things you could do with them (well, maybe a little) but rather, do they have the look? How do they react in front of the camera? Can they follow directions? Anything about their body that might turn people off (big feet, hairy butt, etc).

      When I was getting my photography degree we were required to do sketches of nude models. Both male and female. I can assure you that when the model is on the stand you're not thinking, "Whoa! She's hot. Wonder if I can take her out to dinner or something else, hint, hint, wink, wink". Rather, you're thinking, "Holy shit, how am I supposed to draw her elbow in that position?", "Dammit! Why can't I get that shadow around her hip right?", "It would be nice if I didn't have to see her fingers in profile" Repeat for every session you drew a nude model.

      For the record, in case you were wondering about getting a programming job for an adult website, check my journal for a lengthy article about what the reality is like. You may have to go back a bit to find it. It's called, 'Getting a tech job in the adult industry'. It was never accepted which is why it's in my journal. After all, why would the editors accept a story about programming and porn.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    7. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Couldn't agree more with this. It's a sad but unfortunate fact of life. Make something you enjoy into a full-time job, and it no longer becomes enjoyable... it becomes a job.

      I am one of those people that tell everyone else to stay away when they start asking questions about the industry if they want to keep your interest in looking at porn strong.

      On another note, the adult community as a whole has some of the nicest, most intelligent people I've ever met who will do anything for you and who strongly believe in the same moral issues as the average person. I sometimes forget that when I'm talking to people and relate something back to my job that for the most part, it is frowned upon.

      Easiest way I've found to fix that is to find a new friend. After all, there's no time to be talking to ignorant folk who refuse to open their minds farther than the book bindings of their bibles will allow.

    8. Re:WTF? by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Ya know... I thought the same thing you do, as I was drawing. Then I noticed that my friend Hugh, who was modelling nude for some of my college's art classes, was almost always dating one of the women in one of the classes for which he was modelling. I asked him about it and he said he ended up sleeping with one of the students from the class about every third modelling session. And he's not a great-looking guy, tho' he does have a reasonably nice build. He didn't brag about it, either, which is why I tend to believe him: he just answered my question when I asked him about why he was always having coffee/lunch/study sessions with women in the art department when he was a math major.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    9. Re:WTF? by computational+super · · Score: 1

      I always wondered about that myself. Before I got the job I have now, I used to "daydream online" from time to time by visiting a certain travel website and putting together/pricing different dream vacations. The job I have now? You guessed it - I now work for that travel website. And I'll tell you something - the last $#(@% thing I want to see when I get home is that web site that has kept me up until 3 AM more than once...

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    10. Re:WTF? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Rather, you're thinking, "Holy shit, how am I supposed to draw her elbow in that position?", "Dammit! Why can't I get that shadow around her hip right?", "It would be nice if I didn't have to see her fingers in profile"

      It sure would be a lot easier if there were some kind of machine that could capture all of these details for you automatically. What did you say your degree was in?

    11. Re:WTF? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      I may have gotten a photography degree but art courses such as the one I described were requirements. Essentially it was to help one understand light and shadows and how objects interact with said light and shadows. It forced one to think about what one wanted to accomplish even if you would never paint/sketch again but would be focused on photos.

      I also had to do some wire sculptures and guache paintings for this same teacher (different classes though). Again, not directly related to photography but it helped when considering form and composition.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  15. Lightspeed by CheeseTroll · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...the name "lightspeed" came from an alias Mr. Jones adopted in computer chat rooms in the early 1990s.

    Excellent! I'm all set to follow in his footsteps!

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    1. Re:Lightspeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but CheeseTroll University doesn't sound anywhere near as impressive.

    2. Re:Lightspeed by AberBeta · · Score: 1

      CheeseTroll University?
      oh please do..

    3. Re:Lightspeed by thesnarky1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, "lightspeed" is the name his wife gave him... and also the reason she forced him into the porn business in order to meet real men.

  16. hahaha by YourM0m · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Mr. Jones's mother works for Lightspeed Media, handling customer service duties..." I'm sorry but that just makes me LOL!

    --
    Steve -- http://tail-f.net/
    1. Re:hahaha by ringo3999 · · Score: 1

      Me too. I guess I am still a little unclear what her job duties really are!

  17. Naive parents. by Funkcikle · · Score: 5, Funny
    "My kids have no clue what we do."

    Yeah right. And Steve Ballmer's children have never touched an iPod or used Google.

    They'll have an idea something is not quite right. Moving house because the neighbours won't let you play with their kids? Not at all suspicious.

    Keep up the good work though, Superdad! Shame you can't get that bumper sticker "Your AP kid gets DP'd by my kids".

    1. Re:Naive parents. by shredthrashgrind · · Score: 1

      wait until one day they simply GOOGLE their dad's name. Oh boy

    2. Re:Naive parents. by neomajic · · Score: 1

      Answering machine msg: "Hi. This is the Jones. Sorry we missed your call. Leave name & number at the beep. We'll get back to you, asap. Bye!" Beep! Caller on answering machine: "Mr. Lightspeed? It's me, Molly. Molly Melons. I just wanted to confirm the facial shoot for tomorrow morning."

  18. Check out Novell's site. by khasim · · Score: 1
    Cool. The Wall Street Journal is submitting their own articles to Slashdot now. Nothing like a little free advertising.
    Look at this page. http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/tip/17134.html

    Hey, they make it easy for you to submit it to digg and slashdot. And those links seem to be part of their page template. Could be a wave of the future. Provide links from your material so people can easily submit it to other websites as "news".

    Now, if there was some way to submit slashdot stories to Novell ...
  19. This being slashdot... by thepotoo · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...this is something that a lot of us are interested in.

    I have no problem with WSJ submitting one or two articles that we might like now and again, but if it happens more than a couple of times, I'll start getting really worried.
    Bottom line: The occasional submission; OK, regular submissions; they're using us.

    --
    Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    1. Re:This being slashdot... by kevin_conaway · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Carl Bialik" from the WSJ has had dozens of stories accepted. Who cares? His summaries are usually concise and accurate and the linked articles are informative as well.

      I have no problem with him or the WSJ submitting articles to Slashdot

    2. Re:This being slashdot... by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Using 'us' for what? Is it the irrational hatred of corporations, indeed all business? Or maybe they're dying to tap into piracy promotion.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    3. Re:This being slashdot... by conJunk · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Carl Bialik" from the WSJ has had dozens of stories accepted. Who cares? His summaries are usually concise and accurate and the linked articles are informative as well. I have no problem with him or the WSJ submitting articles to Slashdot

      amen. especially since they are honestly attribute. not beatlesbeatles shennanigans here, he says who he is upfront, it's all on the up and up, and the articles are usually of interest.

    4. Re:This being slashdot... by thepotoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      see the big subscribe now button on the top right corner of the page? What about the ads some of us are bound to click on? (TOSHIBA: Copy Fax Print at the bottom of the page)

      He probably makes money off this, and that's not something I like.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
    5. Re:This being slashdot... by jargoone · · Score: 1

      WSJ submitting stories is something that makes you "really worried"? Wow. You must have a pretty low-stress life. What's your secret?

    6. Re:This being slashdot... by eaglej · · Score: 1

      Who cares how many posts they submit? If too many are actually approved, then we have a problem with the mods, not with the WSJ.

    7. Re:This being slashdot... by slashrogue · · Score: 1

      Whatever you say, Carl! :P

    8. Re:This being slashdot... by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      Bottom line: The occasional submission; OK, regular submissions; they're using us.
      Using you? Using you how?

      I work for a technology magazine that covers news, reviews, and feature articles related to application development, Linux and open source, databases, security and identity management, yadda yadda. If I submit my magazine's articles to Slashdot, am I using you? Maybe I should just wait around for someone else to submit them -- would you feel less "used" then? Suppose I submit stuff for friends who work for other publications -- is it a conspiracy?

      The reality is that I submit stories very rarely and when I do they usually get rejected -- just like you. So where's the problem?

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    9. Re:This being slashdot... by mizhi · · Score: 1

      His summaries are usually concise and accurate and the linked articles are informative as well.

      Which contrasts quite nicely with the usual crap summaries that we get on /.

      --
      Humorless sig goes here.
    10. Re:This being slashdot... by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with people making money? Is it at your expense, somehow? Did it hurt you, or someone you know, to know someone may have clicked on an ad and purchased a product? Is it morally wrong to allow someone to make a living? Amplify, please - I have to know the root of this one.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    11. Re:This being slashdot... by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      Bialik's great. He writes the Journal's "Numbers Guy" column, which is almost reason enough to pony up the $100/yr for Online Journal all by itself.

    12. Re:This being slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He lives with his parents.

    13. Re:This being slashdot... by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly enough, the folks who wrote that article would really like to get paid.

      You do know people do this for a living, right?

      I have no problem with the Wall Street Journal promoting its articles here. They are great articles and that's what matters.

      D

    14. Re:This being slashdot... by thepotoo · · Score: 1
      Yeah it hurt me: Not directly, but even so.

      He's using slashdot as a site to push his agenda, he's not paying the site anything, and he's getting free advertising in exchange.

      Like I said before, one or two articles I'm fine with, but more than that isn't cool.

      It's like someone who's exploiting google pagerank. It's irritating.

      --
      Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
  20. Worthless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a complete waste of space - this 'news' is ... and bogus too. Why else would someone who is trying to keep their 'illicit' job a secret - let the Wall Street Journal cover it?

    Idiotic.

  21. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shame you can't get that bumper sticker "Your AP kid gets DP'd by my kids".

    That got a guffaw out of me. I'm sorry I used up all my mod points in the Vista Aero piracy thread.

  22. I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning by erbmjw · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From the tail end of the article
    As his children get closer to adulthood, he said, he'll explain what their parents do. "I wouldn't mind if my kids get involved in this business," he said. Then he added: "Behind the scenes."
  23. Carl Bialik's Revenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Cool. The Wall Street Journal is submitting their own articles to Slashdot now. Nothing like a little free advertising.
    No, as it turns out, Steve cut Carl from the p0rn after Carl's credit card was maxed out. Carl decided to oust him via an exposé and was just looking for a quick distribution of information method (the slashdot effect).
  24. Re:This is news? Oh really? by borkus · · Score: 1

    I read the article and had the same "meh" reaction as well. There's really nothing about porn as a business - I assume there is some actual reason for entertaining lavishly at one of these conventions. The article makes a brief mention of business connections, but doesn't really go into how they work.

    Porn jokes aside, I'm kind of interested in how that business actually works. Does Jones generate all of his own content? Does he license content from other providers? How does he handle distribution of physical inventory? How do contracts with stars work? How does he deal with credit card fraud? There actually could be a business story behind this. WSJ just decided to say that porn is naughty and pornographers have to live in secrecy. Ho-hum.

  25. An article about his business model would better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone have any more interesting information about the guy, the business, or his business model? For example - how much he pays x model for a photoshoot, how much he profits, etc etc etc

    That would be far better reading than this article.

  26. Does Lightspeed university have a masters program? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Work will reimburse my MBA classes, and $30/month seems like a great deal on tuition either way! Hope I can keep my grades up!

  27. Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an ardent [hetero] consumer of Internet pr0n, I have to ask, "why should I care about male porn stars?"

  28. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by IflyRC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Great, exploit other people's family members, just not his. Personally, if I was working in something that I was ashamed to tell my family members about I think I'd rather be digging ditches.

  29. obligitory Family Guy quote by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    gigitty gigitty gigitty - Quagmire

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:obligitory Family Guy quote by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      Quagmire's mom: (shouting off-screen): Glenn, would you feed mittens? Quagmire: Mittens has food in his bowl! Quagmires' mom: That's old food! (cat meows) Quagmire: Mittens, shut up! Mittens shut up! Quagmire's Mom: Don't you talk to Mittens that way. Mittens is a member of this family. Quagmire: Mom if you want this three-way to happen, you're gonna have to change your tone.

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    2. Re:obligitory Family Guy quote by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      Actually, it goes something like this:

      Quagmire: Giggity giggitty, let's have sex!
      Random guy: Who else but Quagmire?

  30. Question. by grumpyman · · Score: 1

    One thing I wanna know about the industry is the background of the personnel, and how they came up with all those catchy movie names. Explicit yet subtle: "Mission to Uranus" or "Bottom Feeders"

    1. Re:Question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's some more for you - have they been made yet?

      - Piledriving Miss Daisy
      - On Golden Blond

  31. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by Bromskloss · · Score: 1
    Personally, if I was working in something that I was ashamed to tell my family members about I think I'd rather be digging ditches.
    I do dig ditches, but I'm far to ashamed to tell my family.
    --
    Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
  32. Here's a photo of the dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Steve Lightspeed - He seems to enjoy his job.

    1. Re:Here's a photo of the dude by alienfluid · · Score: 1

      DO NOT click the link - it's not work safe!!!

    2. Re:Here's a photo of the dude by chawly · · Score: 1

      Depends on the pay, but what's not to like.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  33. What's wring with porn, really? by Kunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't see anything morally wrong with it, as long as it is done by consenting adults. It's entertainment.

    1. Re:What's wring with porn, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree and have no problem with "normal" porn, however I think people getting off to videos of tubgirl or the goatse guy are a little strange.

  34. I can just imagine the kids' conversations... by cliveholloway · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...when they become teenagers.

    Joe Ordinary: "I found my dad's secret porn stash - four copies of Hustler!".

    Lightspeed Jr: "*cough*, well..."

    I have a feeling they'll be very popular at High School :)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    1. Re:I can just imagine the kids' conversations... by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 1

      Uhh...

      He has daughters...

    2. Re:I can just imagine the kids' conversations... by cliveholloway · · Score: 2

      Girls can like porn too. Sexist!

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    3. Re:I can just imagine the kids' conversations... by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 2, Funny

      (Laugh out loud)

      And in this case, they would really be popular in their high school.

      Daughter: "Check out the rack on this one!"
      Horny Boy: Eyes bulging "Uhh... what?!"

    4. Re:I can just imagine the kids' conversations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like my wife. She's always checking out other women and pointing them out to me.

  35. Re:If this is the guy from Lightspeed University.. by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

    Lightspeed manages to find the right girls. Not always the hottest, but the ones you might really want to be with.

    And if you've ever watched the Tawny Stone videos...that girl is a clown, and a freak. Not a bad combo.

    --
    No reason to lie.
  36. Re:If this is the guy from Lightspeed University.. by parasonic · · Score: 1

    How the summary is written...

    Steve Jones, the 39-year-old married father of two behind the Lightspeed persona

    ...before I started reading the comments, I thought that this guy sent his two girls to work in his business.....or two boys (!?!?)

  37. I am so, so sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Your AP kid gets DP'd by my kids
    ...but I don't know what that means! :-( "AP"? "DP"? Tell me.
    1. Re:I am so, so sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AP = Advanced Placement
      DP = Double Penetration

    2. Re:I am so, so sorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AP = Advanced Placement (a college track in high school)
      DP = Double Penetration

  38. On the contrary... by TheNoxx · · Score: 1

    I think you have vastly overestimated the worth of living in the "real world" (which I believe we are defining as average folk, so most slashdotters said adieu to that part of society many times over). I can't imagine a single interesting person I know that would stigmatize someone for working in the pornography business. Now, I'm aquainted with a hundred or so uninteresting, uninspired (but generally nice, if not misguided) folk that would ostracize such a fellow; but in all honesty, if I had some attribute that culled the time spent with people I'm just not impressed or interested in I would call it a blessing. There are, of course, a few exceptions... but nothing a good heart and personality wouldn't fix.

    --
    Ex nihilo nihil fit.
  39. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    No differnt than people that look at porn. Would you like it if it was you daughter, mother, sister, wife, or girlfriend in that picture or movie?
    If the answer to any of those is no then join club Lightspeed.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  40. I used to like computers... by zen611 · · Score: 1

    'till I had to look at them all day...

  41. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by hackstraw · · Score: 4, Informative

    As his children get closer to adulthood, he said, he'll explain what their parents do. "I wouldn't mind if my kids get involved in this business," he said. Then he added: "Behind the scenes."

    These statements are in no way contradictory or hypocritical. Steve is behind the scenes, and is recommending the same to his children.

    There may be more to Steve Lightspeed than I know, but I've seen some of his work and it was primarily very young and young looking girls doing naked dances and/or heavy petting with another similar girl. Jordan Capri was/is his star model, and she is extremely cute. AFAIK, there is no guy/girl stuff or hardcore, just cuties being cute.

    In my eye, its not even porn. But there is no clear definition of porn at this time.

  42. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I thought the same at first, too. Then I realized, this is no different than what any other parent would say.

    We all love the garbage men as well, who come and pick up our trash and thus keep our properties from becoming landfills. Yet, nobody really wants their kid to become a garbage man. ;) I'm sure even most garbage men would prefer their kids go off to college and become doctors/et cetera.

  43. Only worthwhile part of this "news" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best part of this article is easily this quote from Mr. Jones, "'I drive an old, beat-up minivan.'" He sounds very respectable and trustworthy.

  44. Family values by mariox19 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Mr. Jones said he has been particularly worried about shielding his children. The Joneses installed software to block illicit content on both of their kids' PCs, and Mr. Jones has password-protected his and his wife's computers.

    And it's as simple as that, even if you yourself are in the porn business. If only more parents would take the time to do this, we wouldn't suffer the spectacle of holier-than-thou types demanding that the government step in and place the entire Internet under a giant, child-proof cap.

    --

    quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

  45. LINK NOT WORK SAFE!!! by jrf83317 · · Score: 0

    NOT WORK SAFE

  46. Re:If this is the guy from Lightspeed University.. by dr_dank · · Score: 2, Funny

    which it'd be hard to assume it isn't, then sir, I owe you a drink.

    You don't owe him anything. If anything, he owes you a few boxes of tissues.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  47. internet policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if you work for Lightspeed Media Corp, do you get in trouble if porn is NOT found on your PC?

    1. Re:internet policy by kashani · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who worked for Danni's Hard Drive. Getting caught surfing Yahoo and other mainstream sites could eventually get you written up. Porn was always okay.

      kashani

      --
      - Why is the ninja... so deadly?
    2. Re:internet policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure you weren't the "friend"?

  48. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by Panaflex · · Score: 1

    Never seen a "garbage collector" salary report, have you? You'd be surprised I think - they make nothing starting out but eventually they get paid pretty well. Better than a lot of jobs out there, and usually with very good insurance.

    And yes, I actually do know a couple of people that "always wanted" to be garbage men.

    --
    I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  49. Re:This is news? Oh really? by whimmel · · Score: 1

    There are several resources you can use to answer some or all of your questions. avn.com and ynotmasters.com among them.

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
  50. Obligatory Airplane! quote by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    Ted Striker: My orders came through. My squadron ships out tomorrow. We're bombing the storage depots at Daiquiri at 1800 hours. We're coming in from the north, below their radar.
    Elaine Dickinson: When will you be back?
    Ted Striker: I can't tell you that. It's classified.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  51. This is a comment? by dema · · Score: 1

    I am unsure as to why this is a comment. User X remarks about Slashdot story Y, an blog not looked upon with great respect by a majority of the public. Because of this X does not want his family to know he remarks about Y blog and generally associates with people from the Y blog so as to avoid embarassment due to his profession.

  52. Misleading title? by eck011219 · · Score: 1

    "The man behind Online Pr0n's Steve Lightspeed" seemed to indicate the story would not be about him, but about some other dude.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  53. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by tgd · · Score: 2, Funny

    In my eye, its not even porn. But there is no clear definition of porn at this time.

    Yeah, if you don't start with a horse, a midget, a tub of lard and a big blue tarp it hardly qualifies.

  54. Then there's San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Then there's San Francisco. I stop in at a bondage shop to see a friend who works there and find the manager, a striking blonde who's been in several pornos and is unashamed about it, working the cash register. She usually has her clerks doing that, and I ask her where everyone is. "Oh, they're at dildo training".

  55. Uh, no? by thepotoo · · Score: 2, Informative
    google for "steve jones"

    Guess his secret is safe enough, even if that is his real name. I bet they DID obfuscate it, anyway.

    --
    Obligatory Soundbite Catchphrase
  56. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

    IMHO, once chicks start getting spread-eagled, they've crossed the line from erotica to porn.

    "Cuties being cute" would be more along the lines of non-nude or teasing-but-still-barely-non-nude. Lightspeed stuff qualifies as solo porn.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
  57. Time to earn the "Troll" mod again... by PenguinBoyDave · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It seems to me that for someone to be concerned about shielding his children, etc. and that people who find out won't let their kds play with his because they don't like his business, and this bothers him, perhaps he should find another line of work.

    --
    I'm not a troll, but I play one on Slashdot.
    1. Re:Time to earn the "Troll" mod again... by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


      It seems to me that for someone to be concerned about shielding his children, etc

      Do you drink? Do you want children to drink? I guess you're concerned about alcohol then. Do you think someone that works for Anheuser-Bush shouldn't shield their kids from alchohol because they work for an industry that sells it?

      There's such a thing as age appropriateness. I fail to see how there's anything inconsistant here.

      and that people who find out won't let their kds play with his because they don't like his business, and this bothers him

      He's protecting his kids from the intolerant people of the world. Wouldn't it bother anyone if neighbors went so far as to punish your kids because they didn't approve of you? That seems like more of a problem with the neighbors. They don't have to like him, or what he does, but banning their kids from associating with his kids is just bigotry.

      --
      AccountKiller
  58. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    Yet, nobody really wants their kid to become a garbage man. ;)

    Amusingly enough a friend of mine (he and his wife are both college/university professors) with a young son said basically "after what I've been through I might go ahead and tell my kid to be a garbage man or a truck driver."

  59. what Daddy does for a living by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daddy keeps peoples self winding watches fully wound up :]

  60. Correct me if I am wrong. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    The story was interesting. In fact, many WSJ stories are interesting. And they want exposure ( as many readers as possible). What is wrong with that?

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  61. Hypocrisy: What we don't want our kids to know by lamebrane · · Score: 1
    Ok, So I'm an out-of-employ software engineer(not, engineer that is).

    Your daddy is dropping incendiary bombs on innocents in some Middle-East backwater.

    Your mommy works with Merck and helps people lead better lives through pharma.

    When you grow up, you can take over the helm of the WalMega Corp and provide fine products to the poor workers that aren't getting living wages, and that can't afford the products unless we also offer them banking services (loans).

    Our congressman/person is an upstanding member of our community who has never porked an underage, same-sex, animal/intern. He is only interested in representing our interests.

    Fortunately, the end-of-life services provided in the US will make sure that we will rest in peace ($10,000 burial, $200,000 keep-alive-as-long-as-possible hospital stay [not including pain mediation], post-interrment removal of body parts.)

    Whoops, I got off-topic...

  62. What a let down by Stanneh · · Score: 1

    Was i the only one expecting this guy to resemble quagmire? Giggity Giggity Giggity!

    --
    I Predict A Riot
  63. NSWF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I guess that should be expected for an article about pr0n :P

  64. The invasion by Devir · · Score: 1

    For some reason I think Slashdot is being invaded by Fark.

  65. Google Steve Jones by Illbay · · Score: 1
    Except shortly everyone Googling for his name will know who he is and what industry he works in.

    Do you really think that googling "Steve Jones" is going to result in a plethora of focused information?

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  66. Social stigma by metamatic · · Score: 1
    The guy has a job that carries social stigmas.

    To you and middle America, maybe. Personally, I'd rather socialize with him than with someone who works for Microsoft or Halliburton. Now there are some jobs I see as having social stigma.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  67. FidoNet by Illbay · · Score: 1
    ...the name "lightspeed" came from an alias Mr. Jones adopted in computer chat rooms in the early 1990s.

    Interesting to think that FidoNet may have been the cradle of the king of cyber-porn.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  68. What goes into a name... by Cumikaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I always wonder what some names really mean. For example, before I read the article I assumed "lightspeed" was an indicator of ... well ... something else.

    I wish the article would say a little more about how he got started and also how he got his wife and mom?!? (wtf?) involved. That just seems odd. I wonder how many porn company owners have either their wife or mother working for them?

    "...he and his wife mostly socialize with others inside the porn business.." And that's a bad thing? Damn, I wish I had those problems!

    For those bitching that this isn't news: maybe you're right, but put the word "porn" in the title and it'll get posted on slashdot!

    1. Re:What goes into a name... by Masato · · Score: 1

      If you watch the Frontline episode American Porn you'll see than Adam Glasser, aka Seymore Butts also has his mother working for him in his porn business, so maybe having family working for you isn't as unusual as you might think. After all, if anyone is going to support you in some wacky endeavour it will probably be a member of your family.

  69. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by Illbay · · Score: 2, Insightful
    These statements are in no way contradictory or hypocritical.

    You gotta be kiddin' me.

    "Kids, I just want you to know that we would be very proud for you to be in the family business. We're very proud of our business. Uh, NOT the product, mind you, just the business.

    "You'll go into the 'production' end over my dead body."

    Your take on this is like saying it's "not hypocritical" for a narco-trafficker to punish his kids for taking drugs.

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  70. This is truth... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    Yeah, you'd think so but really, after a while they all blend together and the enjoyment ceases.

    The first time I went to Burning Man (2003 - late in the game), I was intrigued by the number of "naked people". Not oogling them or judging them, or anything, but interested in the fact of the sheer number. By the end of that first day, it all became a part of the background. The environment of the nudists seemed to me just as normal as the clothed members...

    I would imagine that the porn industry would be the same in regards to the models. Thinking about that, and hardcore pornography - seems like it would be a fairly crappy job, because of the routine - which is exactly opposite of the "fantasy" ideas of the profession. But it has to be true...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  71. Quote by metamatic · · Score: 1
    Mr. Jones said his standard reply to such criticism is: "I'm sorry my porn stars don't look used up yet."

    What a nice chap. Quagmire indeed.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  72. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >But there is no clear definition of porn at this time.

    I can't claim I made this up but I read a great definition hereabouts, that I think is absolutely accurate: "if you lose interest in it once you've come, it's porn."

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  73. WTF?!?! They said.... by BugDoomBug · · Score: 0
    they wouldn't use my real name or family details.

    .... last time I trust a reporter.

  74. How many people do you know in porn? by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    I know exactly zero people. (But then again, maybe I know a lot of people and just don't know it). This story is interesting because there's just not a lot of coverage of people that work in pornography outside of the scandalous stories about models destroying their lives with drug addictions. I don't have any problem with porn, but I'd be equally interested in a story about a spammer (which I do have a problem with) and what he tells his family and friends what he does.

    Face it. People that work in industries not officially approved of by society (but which the majority of the populace have bought at some point) is fascinating. Your attempt to generisize it through person X and Industry Y really misses the point. I don't know any person Xs who work for Industry Y. If most people did, this story would be rather boring.

    --
    AccountKiller
  75. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    What I want to know aside from getting a tech job in the industry is how do you actually start a porn company? Can anybody post a good guide? I know plenty of cute girls who don't mind being a little risque or topless for cash, and from all appearances, those softcore tease sites make a LOT of money.

    Also, any info on where he found Jordan? She is certainly cute and seems to have a nice personality.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  76. I used to run a network of adult websites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    (Note: I'm in Ireland)

    I used to run a network of adult websites. I also had to hide this fact from people. Not because I think there is anything wrong with porn, or becuase I'm ashamed or anything like that - I had to hide it because quite a lot of people associate porn with child porn. Obviously this is retarded, but I got tired of having to explain myself.

    It was funny - generally, guys would have great respect for my producing and publishing porn. Girls would either hate me or love me (normally the former.)

    A lot of people would look at me like I was a danger to society, yet afterwards they'd go to the pub, get drunk and fuck some stranger (a typical Friday night in Dublin.) Yet somehow this was perfectly acceptable to them, but I was the weird one...

    PS - HA! The spam verification image for this post is "fondling"!!!!!

    1. Re:I used to run a network of adult websites by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, this story has kind of a law angle that no one seems to be asking: what is the online pr0n industry's attitude towards copyright infringement?

      Looking at porn sites, I don't think I've ever seen a disclaimer that said you could keep the pics for later viewing, but the people running sites must be aware that free sample images are saved for later, uh, 'perusal'. This would technically be copyright infringement (piracy). While we might laugh at the issue, most estimates say pr0n is a bigger industry online than legit music downloads, and the free stuff must be cutting into their profits.

      Did you and other online pr0n merchants see it as a nessecary part of doing business, or did you guys curse every dude who saved 'your' images to his hard drive?

  77. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by hackstraw · · Score: 1

    You gotta be kiddin' me.

    No, I'm not.

    "Kids, I just want you to know that we would be very proud for you to be in the family business. We're very proud of our business. Uh, NOT the product, mind you, just the business.

    "You'll go into the 'production' end over my dead body."

    Your take on this is like saying it's "not hypocritical" for a narco-trafficker to punish his kids for taking drugs.


    Basic human needs and desires are established via culture and biology. Sex and altered states of consciousness are both part of every society known to mankind. Sex is a need, not a want. If I were to stop thinking about sex, it would require castration. Just ask your local Catholic priest. Even after castration, some animals engage is reflexive sexual behavior when they are young.

    Seeing young cuties on a computer or TV screen is an outlet for many. Its cited in many research publications that unwed pregnancy, child porn, molestations, and similar sex problems or crimes are directly proportional to the societal acceptance and openness associated with sex.

    Hypocrisy is denying and ignoring the human need for sex. Myths like adultery is merely thinking of sex with another person besides your spouse does not agree with human nature or any animal that reproduces via sex with another animal. Besides myths about immaculate conception and humans being delivered to the Earth via aliens, sex is where most people come from. The human population is actually growing faster than people are dieing, so somewhere, somehow, when noone is looking, sex is going on.

  78. Re:NeoCons (What's funny about parent?) by Bob+4knee · · Score: 1
    I guess you'd consider me one of those. I'm more of a small "l" libertarian, but vote conservative if forced to choose between the two major parties. I've been this way for a while, and that includes on fiscal matters so I would argue the "neo" part and any attempt to link me to the current administration, but

    The Jesus guy I'm familiar with seemed to hang around with lepers and hookers. He wasn't much for tax-collectors (but, really, who is?). I think the parent is a wee bit confused.

  79. not exactly, Mr. Jones by Schwartzboy · · Score: 1

    If they did use Jones in leiu of his real name, they missed a golden opportunity. How much harder would it have been to call him Johnson instead? Richard Johnson, there's a pseudonym for you.

    --
    "Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix"- Kieren O'Shaughnessy
    1. Re:not exactly, Mr. Jones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Richard Johnson, there's a pseudonym for you.

      Or Willy, or John Thomas.

  80. NSFW by bogie · · Score: 1

    As others found out.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  81. Porn Lightspeed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As in "he does it really really fast?"

    I thought women were always complaining that it doesn't last long enough? As in

    "Why are bull-riding cowboys lousy lovers? Because they think eight seconds is a long ride!"

  82. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    then a lot of men are married to porn stars

  83. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's an excellent thread in the Something Awful forums right now:

    http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?s= bbaeae202b50ae5b572834cc5a1ae2dc&threadid=1773429

  84. ferget, HELL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The grammar NAZIs are no joking matter!

    The gassed almost six million apostrophes in WWII.

  85. I was waiting for someone to mention Jordan Capri by theurge14 · · Score: 1

    Looks like I'm amongst an army of horndogs when it comes to her.

  86. Do unto others... by walu · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    So he wants to keep his children away from it and likes to keep it a secret, but he doesn't mind exploiting other peoples children (aka, "barely legal/18" "youthful models")? He makes these girls look younger than 18? Why even have a family? Why stay with his wife and daughter? Maybe he wants to bring her into the business when she becomes "barely legal". "Everyone thinks we're all involved in every dirty piece of the business. It's really not like that." That's basically like a general telling his troops to go attack a village - he's not actually going into the battle and slaughtering people himself, he just puts out the order, his hands are clean. "Our goal was to make a little extra money for our kids' college fund." So exploit a young college girl whose father is trying to put through college so you can pay for your daughter to go to college? Any chance of a repeating cycle there? I've heard that what goes around comes around, and it may prove true in this case - though I doubt that he will object, as I said he's probably setting her up for a career in it as well. Why have his daughter go to college? So she doesn't have to resort to porn? So why help another college girl resort to porn? A master of hypocrisy he is. Interesting that his mother works for him - that says a LOT. Poor man, he never decided to break the cycle. He has sold his soul to his studity, so naive of the consequences that will follow. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you, Steve.

    1. Re:Do unto others... by aiken_d · · Score: 1

      Have you considered getting some medication? That much anger can't be good for you. Something to calm your nerves might also give you a newfound appreciation for paragraph breaks.

      I don't see any hypocrisy at all. Presumably, he respects both his children's and his models' right to decide their own lives. For his part, he'd recommend staying behind the scenes. Fair enough.

      Your position is as twisted as someone in upper management refusing to hire programmers because they want their kid to get an MBA. Not everyone wants the same things in life.

      Hate porn with as much vigor as you want, but at least be honest about your emotional response rather than concocting this tortured malarky.

      -b

      --
      If I wanted a sig I would have filled in that stupid box.
    2. Re:Do unto others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the idea that having particiated in porn ruins someone life just an outgrowth of the purtanical notions about sex that most people reject these days anyway.

      Yes, some may go into porn due to drug problems, or just to get by, and it leave them feeling used and slimy -- but so does working for fast food places.

      Most guys have looed at playboys or online pics and enjoyed them. Why does enjoying what Women look like without clothes have to be sleazy?

    3. Re:Do unto others... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you get different weather up so high on your pedestal?

  87. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by stienman · · Score: 1

    It doesn't really matter to him, I suspect, since he's working 7 days a week I doubt he sees much of his kids at all.

    Chances are good his kids know exactly what he does, and perhaps feel some sense of shame since he does something that he so disapproves of that he doesn't want to tell them.

    But it's ok, since they've got their own computers and the internet to babysit them.

    -Adam

  88. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by hackstraw · · Score: 1

    IMHO, once chicks start getting spread-eagled, they've crossed the line from erotica to porn.

    "Cuties being cute" would be more along the lines of non-nude or teasing-but-still-barely-non-nude. Lightspeed stuff qualifies as solo porn.


    As I said, there is no generally accepted definition of "porn" beyond that its generally associated with sexual content via some form of media. I'm not sure, but I don't think strip clubs are considered porn. Prime time TV ads in some countries would be considered porn in others. Its all relative.

    Oh, TubeSteak seems appropriate username for this discussion.

  89. So what? by oliderid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He has a nice business, a dozen of employees get a living thanks to it. Models are paid. Customers get what they were looking for. He doesn't promote anykind of violence. There is strictly nothing to be ashamed about. He should be proud of his achievment.

    This is quite strange the fascination/repulsion the society has for this "traditionnal" business. It exists for centuries (first were drawings, then black and white pictures, magazines and now web sites) and so many people are still so unconfortable with it.

    I don't want to sound like a hippy :-) but...Sincerily what is the worst? Producing a movie glorifying the war; singing how great the drug dealer life can be or making a video clip about a beautiful nude girl?

    I prefer the last one.

    Olivier

  90. Common Name by phorm · · Score: 1

    Jones is a very common name, not quite as comman as Smith, but very common. Even if you googled it, you'd still comes up with a little of different Steves.

    However, still not very kinda/responsible of the article author, unless he got permission to write about Mr. Jones.

    1. Re:Common Name by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I checked your assertion, and you know what? You're right!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:Common Name by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      Add "Lightspeed" to the search string - he comes up immediately. This name as connected with Lightspeed porn is clearly well known in the industry, if not outside it.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  91. Re:NeoCons (What's funny about parent?) by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

    I'm very conservative on fiscal matters. That's why I've been voting D. When a Republican sits in the oval office, deficits go up. When a Democrat runs the White House, deficits go down. It's been that way for over a quarter of a century.

  92. this article hold no news value by Device666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I as a nerd am not so interested in the pornbusiness. I can understand the link between the internet and the porn business. But what I don't understand is why this should be stuff that matters and how this is new for nerds. In fact I don't get the news value of this post at all. Being a nerd doesn't mean we wank all day so that these kind of superficial topics would be of any interest.

    1. Re:this article hold no news value by __aabwba5127 · · Score: 0

      "I as a nerd am not so interested in the pornbusiness" i thought as geeks porn was our only sexual outlet :-)

  93. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

    Get a domain, set up a server, advertise, take some pictures that customers will pay to see, post pictures on the server, and if you're running things correctly, Profit!.

  94. Rats! Though TFA was about Lightspeed bicycles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - love their titanium bikes!

    - now if only they'd put out a nice cyclocross Ti bike! :-)

    p.s. bah on pr0n! i'm married and have a healthy sex life, unlike many slashdot readers...

  95. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    What, you want to resign your comission as a scientific officer doing top-secret research for the national Biological/Nuclear/Alien warfare bureau and become a second class again ?

    Damn, that's what I call courage...

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  96. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by hackstraw · · Score: 1

    "if you lose interest in it once you've come, it's porn."

    That does not seem like a very good definition. Husbands frequently go to sleep after sex, and rinse and repeat the process some other night. Most prostitutes are not that good, so after busting a nut, the prostitute is quickly shown the door. I've never heard of someone losing interest in porn after the first or X number of orgasms.

    I guess the best definition of porn is "sensory reproductions of sexually arousing situations often intended for use in masturbation or arousal before a sexual act with another person".

    Ha! I should be a lexicographer so I could say, "I know what I'm talking about, I wrote the book".

  97. Re:NeoCons (What's funny about parent?) by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    I'm even a registered R., and I'm hoping that we lose both the House and the Senate, so that we can do a little self evaluation and (hopefully) return to our original principles. The GOP is not walking what they talk.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  98. Tech ignorant parents can do that till age 8 or so by bADlOGIN · · Score: 2, Informative

    If this guy knew what he was doing, he'd have his cable modem/DSL connected to a proxy server that only routes http (e.g. Squid) in a locked closet and tell the kid they can surf whatever they want, but he'll know all about it. That child protection software will do no good once the kid figures out how to download and burn a copy of any live Linux distro...

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  99. That's just silly... by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1
    I guess they also figure someone who works for a gun manufacturer uses his kids as target practice...

    Of course not! Kids are too precious to be used as target practice.
    Now advanced product testing on the other hand...

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  100. Re:NeoCons (What's funny about parent?) by pzampino · · Score: 1

    Just remember that Jesus also didn't hold back, but told people the truth, in love. Jesus was the first one to point out the sins of those around him. The difference between him and the religious leaders of the time was that he offered them the way of forgiveness rather than just condemnation.

    So, while I agree that Christians ought to live among non-Christians in response to the great commission, the truth is that morality is often reduced to the lowest common denominator. Not being divine as Jesus is, Christians often have to choose not to associate with some other people so they won't compromise. There must be a balance.

    --
    "If men will not be governed by God, they will be ruled by tyrants." - William Penn
  101. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by jaydonnell · · Score: 1
    Your take on this is like saying it's "not hypocritical" for a narco-trafficker to punish his kids for taking drugs.


    Your analogy on this is very sketchy. This guy isn't telling his kids not to consume his products (which is what your analogy is saying). He's not telling his kids not to do what he does. He's telling them not to do a certain job in his company. This seems perfectly reasonable to me.
  102. Obligatory Wozniak Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If my son wants to be a pimp when he grows up, that's fine with me. I hope he's a good one and enjoys it and doesn't get caught. I'll support him in this. But if he wants to be a network administrator, he's out of the house and not part of my family." Steve Wozniak, http://www.woz.org/

  103. damn by random_amber · · Score: 1

    I thought when I threw in my porn webmaster towel and stopped spending half my day on GFY and instead switched to wasting my time on /. that I would also escape having to hear about Steve Lightspeed and Tawnee Stone ever again...I was so wrong! =/

  104. Circular by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1

    God, I love the circular nature of the net. Notice that the WSJ article links to a wikipedia article that uses the WSF article as its source : )

    -Grey

  105. Nothing... by jd · · Score: 1
    ...if the consent is genuine. Not everyone physically over 18 is automatically intellectually and emotionally also over 18, but these are almost impossible for Joe/Jane Average to quantify in person, and totally impossible under isolating conditions such as a photograph or a movie.


    That's also assuming that there's no duress involved (Linda Lovelace claimed to have worked at gunpoint, and the UN reports that slavery is on the increase in the US) and that the alternatives are viable (minimum wage is less than half of what's needed for a single person to actually live). One of the problems is that the education needed to get a job worthy of the name is expensive, even though well-paid jobs pay the Government through extra income tax.


    It's impossible for anyone to be 100% sure that consent has been given, but if you are confident that it has (within whatever threshold you set for yourself) and that it is likewise genuine, then I can see nothing wrong.


    I would add one other proviso - if fMRI scans subsequently prove that there is permanent harm to those sections of the brain involving judgement, then you would also need to give yourself consent to cause that harm, in full knowledge. At this time, no such harm has been proven - all studies have been statistical in nature and no study of actual mechanisms have been bothered with. (Both sides seem to prefer clearly defined regions of doubt and uncertainty, suggesting that most studies are actually being carried out by philosophical white mice.)


    Note that this last bit requires a demonstration of actual harm, BUT ALSO allows all individuals concerned the right to override this through personal choice.


    Freedom of choice is only meaningful if it allows you to choose something someone else might not like. But it is also only meaningful if you are free to choose, and have a working knowledge of what the choices are.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  106. Re:NeoCons (What's funny about parent?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always been taught that it's fine to spend time with anyone, as long as you stay true to God.

    For instance, if your neighbor is an alcoholic, invite him over for a BBQ, go with him to the county fair. However, if he's going to a bar, tell him you can't and explain why. Offer alternatives to the bar even.

    If it's relevant, tell him about your life and your walk with God. If it's not, don't bring it up. Witness to him by showing him your life with God, not by quoting scripture and telling him he's going to hell.

    This is a simplistic view of things, but it get's my point across. BTW, I can't consider myself a christian right now, however I used to be.

  107. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    These statements are in no way contradictory or hypocritical. Steve is behind the scenes

    Heh, of course he is. He's a dude. If he were the one in front of the camera, he'd be out of business.

  108. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by Abreu · · Score: 1

    So you say that the guys working at Phillip Morris encourage their kids to smoke?

    I mean, Im planning on purchasing a franchise for a small convenience store (kinda like 7Eleven), but no way I would be letting my kid work on a place like that...

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  109. Big Dumb Soapbox by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    If only more parents would take the time to do this, we wouldn't suffer the spectacle of holier-than-thou types demanding that the government step in and place the entire Internet under a giant, child-proof cap.

    Hey, don't you trample on my rights to be an inept ignorant parent without consequences, you racistsexistbigotedhomophobe.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  110. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

    If I don't want my child to be a game programmer because the industry abuses them, is that any different from not wanting that child to be a porn star because of the abusive aspects of the industry? Am I then obligated to stop buying video games and viewing porn?

  111. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Incredibly NSFW link showing its more than just cute girls being cute:

    http://galleries.jordancapri.com/fg/039/?r=nastyf2 -rev NSFW!!

  112. what about bumfights ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im just saying, ...

    (and now back to #xxxhackedpasses)

  113. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by hackstraw · · Score: 1

    Am I then obligated to stop buying video games and viewing porn?

    Yes, if you truly believe that buying video games requires its programmers to be treated poorly and the same with your favorite starlet, and you feel bad about the way they are treated, why perpetuate the bad treatment?

    Good porn starlets are hard to come by. Many of the longer career ones appear to be very healthy psychologically and are often very intelligent as well. The ones between 18 and 22 or so years old often don't last long. They can't hack it. You know, good game programmers are hard to come by too. They are what, between 18 and 25 years old, or at a max around 30. They are often intelligent as well, and they too don't last long.

    Its a tough call. Sometimes I feel bad about buying clothes that I know are made in a sweatshop overseas. Sometimes I feel bad about buying electronics that are manufactured overseas by similar people. I never feel bad about porn stars, prostitutes, or game developers.

    So, we both have cognitive dissidence to deal with.

  114. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by muleboy · · Score: 1

    Maybe more like a mine owner not wanting his kids to go into the mines.

  115. Re:I just love the smell of hypocrisy in the morni by muleboy · · Score: 1

    Hahaha!

    "cognitive dissidence"

    I like that, I'm going to use it.