Probably not as unsusual as it once was, but this was in the day before wirless became popular. But I had run (tee, hee) some cable to the bathroom and well, it was an interesting artical. Shure beats the newspaper.
Get a life, get a clue, and get a grip. Finaly sombody posts sompthing besides comenting on adds (read: is actualy talking about the story) and your paraniod (and inaccurat) ass gets all bent out of shape.
We all know that there are idots out there but posting this artical on/. is just very high level flamebait.
Re:FreeBSD 4.1 Released: Public Unusually Indiffer
on
FreeBSD 4.1 Released
·
· Score: 1
Hi jim 1) Nither do I coffee is a metafore 2) Flirting is a form of human interaction 3) 5 kids???? Is that not a bit exesive your poor wife. Your poor pocket book. Our poor environment. 4) Dislexea is not stutidity. 5) Then perhaps you ought to read the FAQ before you post. 6) See #3 I think that you might be, see #4 I may be but that has nothing do do with my spelling.
Yahoo has been using AltaVista for more years that I can remember and no they are not moveing away from BSD any time soon (B1 of the SFCron march of 200) As for HotMail MS has been trying desperatly to move it off of BSD ever synce they bought it and they have yet to succeed. Sorry to burst YOUR bubble. Don't feal bad you can always lash out at my spelling.
Re:FreeBSD 4.1 Released: Public Unusually Indiffer
on
FreeBSD 4.1 Released
·
· Score: 1
Where you born stuped or did you work real hard at it, Oh wait I get it you are one of them Troll thinges, cute. Why, if you are so starved for attention, don't you just go down to your local coffie shop and flirt with the girl behind the counter?
Obviously you don't, so how do you know that it is "broke-ass" or a "piece of shit"? and yes lots of people use it. But I guess that open-minds arn't part of the Open movement.
Nice judge and entier OS on one single incedent. BTW what hardware config are you running? And what ver of BSD? Just curious cuz every benchmark I have seen between Any BSD and redhat has shown BSD to average better. (I am not saying that this is true for Linux in general just redhat, although the resent artical on slashdot pointing to this shows the contrary)
Slow down, we are all frends hear. If nothing else show some respect for the project that started the entier OpenSorce movement. You don't have to use it and you don't even have to like it. But you shuld realize that BSD and Linux are freands. To sum up: CHILL DUDE!!
Or if you wan't to do it the lame way, you can always just slip the new CD in the drive and hit upgrade. That is as long as you have enough HD space on/usr which I often do not.
What are you, dim? I thought that bye now most people had figured out that the clock speed has exactly 0 to do with the actualy speed of a processer. But I guess I am wrong.
Lets start from the beginging and work out from there. First why don't you want to use a Mac? Seconde If you don't want to use a mac why not just use a standard sony monitor?
This was in his original book.
Probably not as unsusual as it once was, but this was in the day before wirless became popular. But I had run (tee, hee) some cable to the bathroom and well, it was an interesting artical. Shure beats the newspaper.
Get a life, get a clue, and get a grip. Finaly sombody posts sompthing besides comenting on adds (read: is actualy talking about the story) and your paraniod (and inaccurat) ass gets all bent out of shape.
You mean like double-click???
We all know that there are idots out there but posting this artical on /. is just very high level flamebait.
Hi jim 1) Nither do I coffee is a metafore 2) Flirting is a form of human interaction 3) 5 kids???? Is that not a bit exesive your poor wife. Your poor pocket book. Our poor environment. 4) Dislexea is not stutidity. 5) Then perhaps you ought to read the FAQ before you post. 6) See #3 I think that you might be, see #4 I may be but that has nothing do do with my spelling.
I agree with you 100% I was just questining the speed claims and I am honistly curious about the hardware
Yahoo has been using AltaVista for more years that I can remember and no they are not moveing away from BSD any time soon (B1 of the SFCron march of 200) As for HotMail MS has been trying desperatly to move it off of BSD ever synce they bought it and they have yet to succeed. Sorry to burst YOUR bubble. Don't feal bad you can always lash out at my spelling.
Where you born stuped or did you work real hard at it, Oh wait I get it you are one of them Troll thinges, cute. Why, if you are so starved for attention, don't you just go down to your local coffie shop and flirt with the girl behind the counter?
Obviously you don't, so how do you know that it is "broke-ass" or a "piece of shit"? and yes lots of people use it. But I guess that open-minds arn't part of the Open movement.
No, it is not ATT Unix, but it IS Berkeley Unix. Thank you Bill Joy, may one day you get back to computor science.
People like you used to say "Mac OS Bites the big one, Real men use Dos." I tire of zelots. Rob a bank and buy an open-mind
Nice judge and entier OS on one single incedent. BTW what hardware config are you running? And what ver of BSD? Just curious cuz every benchmark I have seen between Any BSD and redhat has shown BSD to average better. (I am not saying that this is true for Linux in general just redhat, although the resent artical on slashdot pointing to this shows the contrary)
Slow down, we are all frends hear. If nothing else show some respect for the project that started the entier OpenSorce movement. You don't have to use it and you don't even have to like it. But you shuld realize that BSD and Linux are freands. To sum up: CHILL DUDE!!
Tell it to HotMail and Yahoo. And almost all of the small to medeum ISP's.
Or if you wan't to do it the lame way, you can always just slip the new CD in the drive and hit upgrade. That is as long as you have enough HD space on /usr which I often do not.
The point of open and free OS's is to not "hope" that somboedy does sompthing but to do it. (Says the man that has contributed darn close to 0)
Well, currently they are way better at both than a pIII and idiots are putting those into laptops. Last time I used one I burnt my,,.. er,,, lap.
More to the point, what other computor manufactuer has a 10-11% marketshare? Apple is the largest computor manufactuer.
What are you, dim? I thought that bye now most people had figured out that the clock speed has exactly 0 to do with the actualy speed of a processer. But I guess I am wrong.
TransMeta for a already RISC compiled OS would be silly.
IBM rs 6000's actualy. Just heard it from a frend of mine that just got a job @ apple.com. and yes the rs runs on what is pritty much a G4.
Lets start from the beginging and work out from there. First why don't you want to use a Mac? Seconde If you don't want to use a mac why not just use a standard sony monitor?
Once again, atack my spelling not my content! You dipshit! Oh did I spell that corectly??
If you have ever tryed to run x86 on a p150 with 32m you would not be so suprised, cheep hardware is not suns forte.