Try this but you won't get much while earth wether pridiction is far better then solar wether it is still pritty lame and probably always will be. Try reading "Chaos" sometime.
Text and hypertext processing Dynamic and interactive graphics; Video Personal data management, including e-mail and networking Programming It is all ther in the next gen of LOGOBOXER
Ther is a programing environment designed to teach kids how to program it is called boxer it is based on logo. It is amazing!! Right now it only works on a Mac. The project is based out of the berkeley school of education. And the auther has a new book out on the topic called Changing minds Get it, read it, do it. You will not be disapointes. I am still trying to get over the BS that I picked up by learning to program in BASIC. But I still have good habits from my LOGO days. Did I mention that Boxer is OO?
Stop complaining about how we now need to recompile all of our chess programes so we can run an the new chips. Forward progress means that yes some times we need to recompile or even sometimes rewrite our apps. But this is the price we pay for newer, faster, better. Unless you want to go the x86 way.
What? I can't spell, wow, I had no idia. Thanks!!!
Any time I hear sombody talkning about "Parents right" it is very clear that they have completley forgoten what it is like to be in high school, your children are alrady out of your hands, the are infact people. All you acomplish by trying to trow you weight around is to iritate and alianate them. And no I am not in high school, I have not been in high school for many years, I just have a memory!
Assuming the increase of intelligence is always accompanied by the decrease of entropy Why the hell would I assume that? Any way ever synce "The Fractal Geomotry of Nature" we have had a much better understanding of the relationship betwen compelxity and entropy. And infact the complexity of the univerce increces not decreaces with entropy.
That is just not true. And if you had bothered to read the artical he points out that IA is curently in use. What do you thing handwriting recognition is based on? Just remember next time that you send in you taxes an AI read the address on the envelope and then another read all of the data on you tax form and selected you for an audit!
I test software for a living and one of the most problomatic things that I encounter is users calling me up at all houres of the night complaning about bugs that they just found on my copmonys software. And I'll spend 5-10 minuts waking up only to dicover that this user is reporting a well documented issue with his v0.081b If we had been smart enough to put an experation date on it the user would have uploaded the new version (one that is not beta) a year ago. S/He would be having no problems and I would be asleap.
I was makeing no attampt to prove anything, he did not so why shuld I, no don't anser that I am grumpy and taking it out on whom ever is at the other end of my keybord. But hay why not.
And what hard ware do you use? Pleas don't tell me that your intel chip is more advanced than that of the IBM/Moterola. Cuz it aint. Read some benchmarks. and while your at it talk to some people at computor repair shops about reliability.
Knowlage is the first step. e=MC^2. Is a pritty good example. 35 Years AFTER he came up with that they actualy made energy out of mass. Of cource he wished that he'd a' never came up with it but hay that is progress for you. Every time sombody askes "But what is it good for?" shows that they have no understanding of how science works. I usaly lump those people in with the "But it is just a thery" folks. I am sory I did not mean to get bitter but the fact is that most of the great progreses that we as a specis have made at the time that it was thought up sombody was saying that is cool, but what is it good for. Y=MX+B What use is that?
Yes, Beculs we all know that earth like planets mean the posibility of life. cuz this one has life. Why must we jump to conclusions based on a experimental data set of 1. We only know of one planet that has life on it. and one that one planet the life we have found so far is so diverce that it is easily imaginable that ther may be life (just based on this one) that may be on planets (or not even planets) that are nothing like ours. We know absolutly nothing about life that may or may not exest elseware (i.e. not on this planet). Yes it may be on earth like planets or It may not. Anybody ever read "Dragons Egg"? Not just flufy sifi but an interesting premis by a well know astrophisisist. Any way Forward (I think it was him) layed out a premis that had inteligent life on a nutron star. Yes it is true that life (probably) needs complex chemacal reations. But that does not mean That it has to be liqued H2O at about 1g. Ok enough ranting basicly what I am saying is that we don't know. and I am a fan of if you don't know don't say that you do!
^V my frend. Delta Vee. How shall I put this? Oh yeah, gravity wells suck! Did you ever stop to wonder why the SatV rockets are so much bigger than ones they use for low earth orbits?
If you don't share conceern you shuld be locked up someware so you don't hurt your self. I am not saying don't do it. But this is one hell of a djinn that we are relecing and we had better make god damned sure that he'll be on our side before we pop the cork.
No that is the point. They are using radicly diferent tecniques. During the infancy of rockets they made the diference between liqued and solid fule, during the infancy of computors it was anolog vrs digital. For autos steem vrs combustion. (and note the better idea does not always win) Like in the infacny of VCRs wene it was Beta vrs VHS.
Solaris on the Sparc is far from free.
Beware of people who don't understand relece sceduls. This is also offtopic and flame bait. Where is a good moderator when you need one.
Frankly mister Pink, the last thing you need is another anti-M$ article.
Try this but you won't get much while earth wether pridiction is far better then solar wether it is still pritty lame and probably always will be. Try reading "Chaos" sometime.
Text and hypertext processing Dynamic and interactive graphics; Video Personal data management, including e-mail and networking Programming It is all ther in the next gen of LOGOBOXER
boxer. One of the guys that wrote "Turtle Geomoty" is behind this OO LOGO on crack! Check it out. very neet stuff.
boxer Is the next genereaton of LOGO
Boxer is the new incarnation of LOGO. It is OO. Scary good and even easyer to learn than LOGO.
Ther is a programing environment designed to teach kids how to program it is called boxer it is based on logo. It is amazing!! Right now it only works on a Mac. The project is based out of the berkeley school of education. And the auther has a new book out on the topic called Changing minds Get it, read it, do it. You will not be disapointes. I am still trying to get over the BS that I picked up by learning to program in BASIC. But I still have good habits from my LOGO days. Did I mention that Boxer is OO?
Are you trying to tell me that sombodys chosen name in not appropriate? Well, I for one find you name inappropriate, "Anonymous Coward"!
Stop complaining about how we now need to recompile all of our chess programes so we can run an the new chips. Forward progress means that yes some times we need to recompile or even sometimes rewrite our apps. But this is the price we pay for newer, faster, better. Unless you want to go the x86 way.
What? I can't spell, wow, I had no idia. Thanks!!!
Or maby I have dislexia?? But I like the insensitive fuck part.
Any time I hear sombody talkning about "Parents right" it is very clear that they have completley forgoten what it is like to be in high school, your children are alrady out of your hands, the are infact people. All you acomplish by trying to trow you weight around is to iritate and alianate them. And no I am not in high school, I have not been in high school for many years, I just have a memory!
Assuming the increase of intelligence is always accompanied by the decrease of entropy Why the hell would I assume that? Any way ever synce "The Fractal Geomotry of Nature" we have had a much better understanding of the relationship betwen compelxity and entropy. And infact the complexity of the univerce increces not decreaces with entropy.
Has anybody applied the Turing Test to this guy?
That is just not true. And if you had bothered to read the artical he points out that IA is curently in use. What do you thing handwriting recognition is based on? Just remember next time that you send in you taxes an AI read the address on the envelope and then another read all of the data on you tax form and selected you for an audit!
I test software for a living and one of the most problomatic things that I encounter is users calling me up at all houres of the night complaning about bugs that they just found on my copmonys software. And I'll spend 5-10 minuts waking up only to dicover that this user is reporting a well documented issue with his v0.081b If we had been smart enough to put an experation date on it the user would have uploaded the new version (one that is not beta) a year ago. S/He would be having no problems and I would be asleap.
I was makeing no attampt to prove anything, he did not so why shuld I, no don't anser that I am grumpy and taking it out on whom ever is at the other end of my keybord. But hay why not.
And what hard ware do you use? Pleas don't tell me that your intel chip is more advanced than that of the IBM/Moterola. Cuz it aint. Read some benchmarks. and while your at it talk to some people at computor repair shops about reliability.
Boy, you realy don't understand what is being talked about do you?
Knowlage is the first step. e=MC^2. Is a pritty good example. 35 Years AFTER he came up with that they actualy made energy out of mass. Of cource he wished that he'd a' never came up with it but hay that is progress for you. Every time sombody askes "But what is it good for?" shows that they have no understanding of how science works. I usaly lump those people in with the "But it is just a thery" folks. I am sory I did not mean to get bitter but the fact is that most of the great progreses that we as a specis have made at the time that it was thought up sombody was saying that is cool, but what is it good for.
Y=MX+B
What use is that?
Yes, Beculs we all know that earth like planets mean the posibility of life. cuz this one has life. Why must we jump to conclusions based on a experimental data set of 1. We only know of one planet that has life on it. and one that one planet the life we have found so far is so diverce that it is easily imaginable that ther may be life (just based on this one) that may be on planets (or not even planets) that are nothing like ours. We know absolutly nothing about life that may or may not exest elseware (i.e. not on this planet). Yes it may be on earth like planets or It may not. Anybody ever read "Dragons Egg"? Not just flufy sifi but an interesting premis by a well know astrophisisist. Any way Forward (I think it was him) layed out a premis that had inteligent life on a nutron star. Yes it is true that life (probably) needs complex chemacal reations. But that does not mean That it has to be liqued H2O at about 1g. Ok enough ranting basicly what I am saying is that we don't know. and I am a fan of if you don't know don't say that you do!
^V my frend. Delta Vee. How shall I put this? Oh yeah, gravity wells suck! Did you ever stop to wonder why the SatV rockets are so much bigger than ones they use for low earth orbits?
If you don't share conceern you shuld be locked up someware so you don't hurt your self. I am not saying don't do it. But this is one hell of a djinn that we are relecing and we had better make god damned sure that he'll be on our side before we pop the cork.
No that is the point. They are using radicly diferent tecniques. During the infancy of rockets they made the diference between liqued and solid fule, during the infancy of computors it was anolog vrs digital. For autos steem vrs combustion. (and note the better idea does not always win) Like in the infacny of VCRs wene it was Beta vrs VHS.