I have zero need for additional paper weights, door stops, and ash trays. I might be more interested when they (a) provide isotropic materials, (b) provide better precision, and (c) provide (a) and (b) at a lower cost.
Still off by a factor of almost 400 years. If you read the referenced paper, there is no mention of hunting large land animals or of mammoths at all. Sounds like original research (unsupported by facts, no less) on the part of the Wikipedia author.
Furthermore of all the radiocarbon dating, the most ambitious date is 1750 BCE. Still 400 years too early for J. Random Eskimo to stick a harpoon in his side. Do you have anything that suggests earlier humans or later Mammoths?
While there appears to be broad agreement that Mammoths did exist on Wrangel as recently as 2000 BCE (4000 years ago), I cannot find any scholarly research to suggest that they co-existed with humans; or if they did, that they were hunted by those humans.
I'm not sure either. I suppose it might be because he can't get no satisfaction. Or perhaps he is a man of wealth and taste. Maybe he wants it painted black. Or all of the above.
Steve... Steve.... The name rings a bell. Wasn't he the guy who earned one dollar a year? What a fantastic counter example you have found. Clearly more companies need to follow this philosophy.
Remember when you trusted Google more than Microsoft or Apple? Remember when you trusted Apple more than Microsoft? Remember when you trusted Microsoft? (I kid, I kid (perhaps)) Being worthy of trust in the recent past does not grant anyone a blank check for current or future actions.
The "all" in this case is describing the extent of "fault", not the extent of "y'all". The test is if we replace "y'all" with some other noun. "It's all Fred's fault." Clearly we are not referring to some multitude of individuals as "all Fred", rather we are assigning all the fault to Fred.
Similarly, it is not too much to expect that appending an apostrophe and "s" could create a possessive form of "y'all".
Finally, there is the "you" (for second person singular), "y'all" (for second person plural), and "all y'all" (for second person collective). I suppose if the GP really wanted to yank your chain, the post could have been written "It's all all y'all's fault." I agree that would sound odd.
Slashdot Mirror
Fun you should ask. It seems there is detailed law covering just that case. http://www.childcarelaw.org/do...
Or were you being sarcastic?
It's a fraudulent contract. How would that not be a crime?
It's an unlicensed hotel. How would that not be a crime?
White collar crimes are still crimes.
Slashdot was never good.
You have to be crazy to go. If you are crazy, they won't send you.
Or you could send a robot and save on spinning spacecraft, food, water, air, and fuel to provide/propel all the above.
They both have a common goal, to get locked in as the de-facto monopoly.
FTFY.
mv -f * /dev/null
I have zero need for additional paper weights, door stops, and ash trays. I might be more interested when they (a) provide isotropic materials, (b) provide better precision, and (c) provide (a) and (b) at a lower cost.
Spooky. That is exactly the ratio of tau to pi.
Still off by a factor of almost 400 years. If you read the referenced paper, there is no mention of hunting large land animals or of mammoths at all. Sounds like original research (unsupported by facts, no less) on the part of the Wikipedia author.
Furthermore of all the radiocarbon dating, the most ambitious date is 1750 BCE. Still 400 years too early for J. Random Eskimo to stick a harpoon in his side. Do you have anything that suggests earlier humans or later Mammoths?
Since most solution algorithms are a database attack, I imagine it will kick out as a non-valid position (i.e. not in the database).
While there appears to be broad agreement that Mammoths did exist on Wrangel as recently as 2000 BCE (4000 years ago), I cannot find any scholarly research to suggest that they co-existed with humans; or if they did, that they were hunted by those humans.
Can you offer more recent research?
Why has Government spending as a % of GDP taken a nosedive?
Might want to check those talking points, they appear to be about four years out of date.
I'm not sure either. I suppose it might be because he can't get no satisfaction. Or perhaps he is a man of wealth and taste. Maybe he wants it painted black. Or all of the above.
Steve... Steve.... The name rings a bell. Wasn't he the guy who earned one dollar a year? What a fantastic counter example you have found. Clearly more companies need to follow this philosophy.
Good to the last drop.
I am a meat popsicle.
Post volume seemed to be the same last week as it was the week before and this week thus far.
There was significantly less bitching about beta.
I still recommend alterslash.org for all your slashdot skimming needs.
Wrong approach. You need to get your car's engine to throw monkey wrenches. Reverse the polarity of the monkey wrench beam, if you will.
Remember when you trusted Google more than Microsoft or Apple?
Remember when you trusted Apple more than Microsoft?
Remember when you trusted Microsoft? (I kid, I kid (perhaps))
Being worthy of trust in the recent past does not grant anyone a blank check for current or future actions.
They will not harm the whales. Only the petunias.
Dude. We don't read TFA, what makes you think we read the summary? Even if we do, we are only looking for misspellings, grammar errors, or somesuch.
Pffft. Content. Who comes to /. for content?
http://dresdencodak.com/2009/0...
Been done.
Good grief.
The "all" in this case is describing the extent of "fault", not the extent of "y'all". The test is if we replace "y'all" with some other noun. "It's all Fred's fault." Clearly we are not referring to some multitude of individuals as "all Fred", rather we are assigning all the fault to Fred.
Similarly, it is not too much to expect that appending an apostrophe and "s" could create a possessive form of "y'all".
Finally, there is the "you" (for second person singular), "y'all" (for second person plural), and "all y'all" (for second person collective). I suppose if the GP really wanted to yank your chain, the post could have been written "It's all all y'all's fault." I agree that would sound odd.
Activities that do not involve /.