Slashdot Mirror


Can Electric Current Make People Better At Math?

cold fjord sends this excerpt from the Wall Street Journal: "In a lab in Oxford University's experimental psychology department, researcher Roi Cohen Kadosh is testing an intriguing treatment: He is sending low-dose electric current through the brains of adults and children as young as 8 to make them better at math. A relatively new brain-stimulation technique called transcranial electrical stimulation may help people learn and improve their understanding of math concepts. The electrodes are placed in a tightly fitted cap and worn around the head. ... The mild current reduces the risk of side effects, which has opened up possibilities about using it, even in individuals without a disorder, as a general cognitive enhancer. Scientists also are investigating its use to treat mood disorders and other conditions. ... Up to 6% of the population is estimated to have a math-learning disability called developmental dyscalculia, similar to dyslexia but with numerals instead of letters. [In an earlier experiment, Kadosh] found that he could temporarily turn off regions of the brain known to be important for cognitive skills. When the parietal lobe of the brain was stimulated using that technique, he found that the basic arithmetic skills of doctoral students who were normally very good with numbers were reduced to a level similar to those with developmental dyscalculia. That led to his next inquiry: If current could turn off regions of the brain making people temporarily math-challenged, could a different type of stimulation improve math performance?"

112 comments

  1. yes by schwit1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's called negative feedback. Up the amps.

    1. Re:yes by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 3, Funny

      A shocking discovery.

    2. Re:yes by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 0

      This is just what I came here to say.:)
      I bet I can make just about anyone better at math with a simple tazer, and the promise of more tazings in the future if they don't improve.

      Can I get a grant to study this? 5 Million a year for 10 years should answer the question definitively. A bargain at twice the price...

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    3. Re:yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Resistance is futile.

    4. Re:yes by jxander · · Score: 2

      The beatings will continue, until grades improve!

      --
      This signature is false.
    5. Re:yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Resistance is futile.

      No. Resistance is the point. If the subject has no resistance, he won't feel the shock as no energy is dissipated in his body.

    6. Re:yes by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Nobody expects the Mathic Inquisition!

    7. Re:yes by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Sounds useless.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    8. Re:yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes sir, may I have another!?!?!?

    9. Re:yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope it sparks further research

  2. Next step by jxander · · Score: 4, Funny

    The next logical step, of course, is increasing the voltage whenever someone gets an answer wrong.

    What could possibly go wrong?

    --
    This signature is false.
    1. Re:Next step by cold+fjord · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except this isn't premised on reward and punishment. This is aimed at altering the way the brain processes information, how the brain functions, to make it better able to work with math.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something wonderful might also happen, either way.

    3. Re:Next step by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Why just limit the testing to one mode? Go for both volts and amps!

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    4. Re:Next step by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 0

      Whoosh. Also, zap.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:Next step by mysidia · · Score: 1

      This is aimed at altering the way the brain processes information, how the brain functions, to make it better able to work with math.

      In other words: it's kind of like a variation on ECT/Electroconvulsive Shock Therapy, minus the Convulsions and pain by using low current.

      The objective is still to change the brain's function. Different people may react to it differently. It is not clear if: in the long term it will be safe.

      The method is still a bit crude -- imprecise and primitive: applying random electrical currents to the body. Which seems to be a continuous fad: I mean, folks, even came up with "Tens Units" for pain management, and various other electrical stimulators as a supposed physical exercise replacement.

  3. Electricity? Use more honey! by mveloso · · Score: 1

    "Use more honey! Find out what she knows!"
    - John W.

  4. maybe, but . . . by djupedal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'better at math' seems a bit vague. Better at algebra, maybe, but many who suffer from dyscalculia excel at higher math, example string theory. We don't need more individuals that are ok w/algebra, so the value here is more about trying to better understand the brain than about helping people get jobs working the register at a food truck.

    1. Re:maybe, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serious question: What problems do you think would come about if everybody was good at math.

    2. Re:maybe, but . . . by paskie · · Score: 2

      Reference needed wrt. "many who suffer from dyscalculia excel at higher math". Not understanding basic numbers and algebra like fractions means that you simply never have much chance to progress to anything higher and interesting. Especially if your first few teachers are incompetent. And without the technical skill and gained routine, it's quite difficult to acquire intuition about how many pieces of higher math work.

      Also, algebra is important for many other areas of science - biology, chemisty, any lab work; mixing solutions, configuring equipment, basic statistics, ... Discalculia means you have big trouble distinguishing between 10 and 100 or comparing 0.32 and 0.23 - you can't (at least easily) build an intuition for it and you have to always fall back to high-level reasoning and logic to work through it. It's possible to make a carreer in natural sciences with discalculia, but it requires huge motivation and effort.

      (I have been intensely teaching someone with discalculia for some time. It's one of the disabilities that's difficult to appreciate without experience.)

      --
      It's not the fall that kills you. It's the sudden stop at the end. -Douglas Adams
    3. Re:maybe, but . . . by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

      Well, the government lotteries would all go out of business. Vegas would be in trouble....

    4. Re:maybe, but . . . by sexconker · · Score: 1

      many who suffer from dyscalculia excel at higher math, example string theory

      lolnope lolnope lolnope
      1 lolnope for using "dyscalculia" to describe idiots who can't understand basic math.
      1 lolnope for claiming that many such dullards excel at "higher math".
      1 lolnope for claiming that string theory is "higher math" - it's fucking wankery without rigor and without testing.

    5. Re:maybe, but . . . by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the growing use of calculators in education is making the problem worse. I know I've read commentary that students have less of a grasp of the numbers these days that in the past would have developed by working the problems by hand. I think that working with slide rules developed a better feel for the numbers. Of course it would probably be cruel and unusual punishment for people to be subjected to slide rules these days.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    6. Re:maybe, but . . . by volmtech · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain. I helped my daughter with her math homework every night her senior year. Tears, lots of tears. An otherwise straight student she couldn't add two simple fractions much less graph a function with negative numbers. When cooking if she wants to double a recipe she uses an app on her smart phone. If it involves more numbers than that she will open up her laptop and use Excel. She got a cosmology degree and works full time.

    7. Re:maybe, but . . . by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the growing use of calculators in education is making the problem worse. I know I've read commentary that students have less of a grasp of the numbers these days that in the past would have developed by working the problems by hand.

      What do numbers have to do with math? :) Once you get into anything moderately advanced actual decimal representations of numbers become less and less important. I doubt I could rattle off the digits of e, but I can marvel that e^(i*pi)=-1.

    8. Re:maybe, but . . . by skids · · Score: 2

      People might start to demand more statistically valid electoral recounts.

    9. Re:maybe, but . . . by paskie · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's awesome! But doesn't cosmology involve a lot of mathematics, actually quite crazy stuff? How did she get through that?

      --
      It's not the fall that kills you. It's the sudden stop at the end. -Douglas Adams
    10. Re: maybe, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way in hell someone that terrible at math did anything remotely mathematical. OP is a neckbeard, or by "cosmology" the person means undergraduate (I.e trivial ).

    11. Re:maybe, but . . . by volmtech · · Score: 1

      She's cosmetologist ( Hairdresser), I feel stupid. :(.

    12. Re:maybe, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "many who suffer from dyscalculia excel at higher math, example string theory": I don't think so, not many people excel at higher math, whatever else they may be suffering from.

    13. Re: maybe, but . . . by Dzimas · · Score: 2

      As a child, I spent agonizing hours fighting to do long division and multiplication by hand. More often than not, I ended up with the wrong answer and came to believe that I "wasn't good at math" simply because of mild dyscalculia. It wasn't until I was older -- and allowed to use a calculator or PC -- that I discovered that my failures were simple mental processing errors ttjat could be overcome with help from technology. So, yes, on one hand I still stumble when performing elementary calculations by hand. On the other, I spend my days optimizing DSP algorithms. Thank goodness I have a computer to do the menial tasks.

    14. Re:maybe, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People would be better able to check, if the loan is actually payable and what all that bullshit the bank is telling them is. The banks would go bankrupt.

    15. Re:maybe, but . . . by khallow · · Score: 1

      1 lolnope for claiming that string theory is "higher math" - it's fucking wankery without rigor and without testing.

      Lack of rigor just means there will be a lot of drama when the day of reckoning comes. It doesn't preclude something from being higher math. And "testing" is completely irrelevant to most higher math.

    16. Re:maybe, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the bright side that job is less likely to be outsourced to China/India/wherever.

      Not much benefit nowadays being a slow and very expensive calculator.

      That said it is still very important to know the difference between big and small numbers. And it is useful to have a feel for whether something gets bigger or smaller and by roughly how much when you do various common math functions on it.

    17. Re:maybe, but . . . by gIobaljustin · · Score: 1

      Better at solving arbitrary problems and performing calculations that are spelled out for you, most likely. Better at innovating and actually understanding what you're doing, though? No.

      --
      Thank you Dave Raggett
    18. Re:maybe, but . . . by sexconker · · Score: 1

      1 lolnope for claiming that string theory is "higher math" - it's fucking wankery without rigor and without testing.

      Lack of rigor just means there will be a lot of drama when the day of reckoning comes. It doesn't preclude something from being higher math. And "testing" is completely irrelevant to most higher math.

      When your "higher math" claims to describe the Universe, yet is proven wrong whenever any actual observations are thrown at it, only for the theory to add more dimensions and more bullshit, then it's nothing but untestable horse shit on the level of the fucking time cube.

    19. Re:maybe, but . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      many who suffer from dyscalculia excel at higher math, example string theory

      lolnope lolnope lolnope
      1 lolnope for using "dyscalculia" to describe idiots who can't understand basic math.
      1 lolnope for claiming that many such dullards excel at "higher math".
      1 lolnope for claiming that string theory is "higher math" - it's fucking wankery without rigor and without testing.

      It's still "higher math"; it's just being used wrong.

    20. Re:maybe, but . . . by khallow · · Score: 1

      When your "higher math" claims to describe the Universe

      That's a physics problem. The math of string theory is completely independent of that claim.

    21. Re:maybe, but . . . by khallow · · Score: 1

      Let me elaborate. Here are some math results in string theory that hold even if the theory has no relevance to the real world. String theory can only be conformal (that is, transformations of the theory preserve angles) with 16 commutative coordinates and/or 10 anti-commutative coordinates (Grassmanian coordinates). There are various sorts of dualities in theory. There is a classification of current string theories into six types with an overarching metatheory ("M theory") which involves all six cases as special choices of parameters.

      There are a variety of dimension-reduction computations which can turn this theory of 16 or 10 dimensions into a theory of fewer dimensions (particularly, 4 which is interesting physically because that's the dimenions of observation space). There are connections between string theories and topological features of a space.

      This goes on. Even if string theory turns out just wrong (or not wrong), or more likely is obsoleted by a better description, these results still hold in some form (though some aspects may have to be heavily modified as rigor is increased in the theory).

  5. I've got a better line of inquiry. by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That led to his next inquiry: If current could turn off regions of the brain making people temporarily math-challenged, could a different type of stimulation improve math performance?

    Here's one. What's the long-term effect of using TCMS during development? Strengthening of the affected areas or weakening thereof / dependency on the stimulation?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:I've got a better line of inquiry. by Zordak · · Score: 1

      That led to his next inquiry: If current could turn off regions of the brain making people temporarily math-challenged, could a different type of stimulation improve math performance?

      Here's one. What's the long-term effect of using TCMS during development? Strengthening of the affected areas or weakening thereof / dependency on the stimulation?

      I believe the Walt Disney Company explored these issues extensively in their excellent documentary on the subject.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
  6. Thinking cap? by sunyjim · · Score: 1

    If this is possible can we call it a "thinking cap" then my grade 3 teacher will have sounded a little less crazy!

    1. Re:Thinking cap? by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Why not just wire fucking solar cells to our brains. Then we can get a energy tax credit AND O-care coverage! Add that up!

    2. Re:Thinking cap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's especially true if you live in Germany... but not that much in the US...
      (http://news.slashdot.org/story/13/02/08/1314220/fox-news-us-solar-energy-investment-less-than-germany-because-us-has-less-sun)

    3. Re:Thinking cap? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Funny that you say that. My third grade teacher actually was crazy. Middle of the school year she went on "leave". She was kind of a female version of Mr Garrison, except without the gender issues (as far as I know).

      And yes, she also told us to put on our "thinking caps". Problem is, hers was screwed on a little too tight.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  7. Well, that makes sense... by Kjella · · Score: 5, Funny

    [In an earlier experiment, Kadosh] found that he could temporarily turn off regions of the brain known to be important for cognitive skills. When the parietal lobe of the brain was stimulated using that technique, he found that the basic arithmetic skills of doctoral students who were normally very good with numbers were reduced to a level similar to those with developmental dyscalculia. That led to his next inquiry: If current could turn off regions of the brain making people temporarily math-challenged, could a different type of stimulation improve math performance?"

    In another earlier experiment, he found that blowing an air raid horn at random intervals duing the math test made students perform weaker. He's now investigating if other sounds can make students perform better.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Well, that makes sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure they can, if the sounds change from a blaring horn to "The answer to question X is Y".

    2. Re:Well, that makes sense... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, the conclusion is that we need to teach math to the members of the congress.

  8. Math concepts unrelated to computation skill by TopherC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I read "...and improve their understanding of math concepts" with a lot of skepticism. I think that schools love to teach computation skills because they are easy to teach and because success there is very easy to measure. But this skill is relatively unimportant compared with what I would consider "math concepts": How you apply mathematical abstractions to real-world situations (beyond making correct change at a cash register). How you break down a hard problem into less-hard pieces. How to visualize quantitative relationships, develop and use algebraic systems, and so on. These are rarely taught in schools because they are relatively difficult to teach and difficult to measure gains. So computation skills are taught instead, regardless of the fact that cheap computers are billions or trillions of times faster than any human.

    Can electric current apply to this kind of conceptual learning? If so, it would have application to nearly all kinds of education, not just math.

  9. If this works... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to be hit with a stun gun before every math exam... like Calculus next Wednesday.

    ^-- Words I'll regret later.

  10. DIY brain boost. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can build this yourself. For around 15 dolars in parts from radioshack. It's just a constant current circuit that limits current between .5 and 3 milliamps. The military has been using it for a while now.

    1. Re:DIY brain boost. by sexconker · · Score: 2

      You can build this yourself. For around 15 dolars in parts from radioshack. It's just a constant current circuit that limits current between .5 and 3 milliamps. The military has been using it for a while now.

      I tried this but all I got was a Nextel phone and some 9 volt batteries. Maybe my Radioshack is broken?

    2. Re:DIY brain boost. by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

      Don't use a quarters for electrodes. . . and don't ask me how I know this.

  11. also works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I am a teacher, and find that student can also learn math if they put their phones down, read the book, concentrate and study.

    1. Re:also works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it doesn't. Not if you have dyscalculia.

  12. The Harrison Bergeron dystopia is near by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Bergeron, hint: there is also a film adaption

  13. National Stasi of America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The next logical step, of course, is increasing the voltage whenever someone gets an answer wrong.

    Do you work for them?

    Oh, and fuck beta!

    1. Re:National Stasi of America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you work for the WOOSH Corps of WOOSHington, D.C.? Oh, and fuck off with your offtopic shit.

  14. the harrison bergeron dystopia is near by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harrison_Bergeron, hint: there is also a film adaption

  15. Is it April Fools day already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really. "developmental dyscalculia." Really?!!!

  16. wrong polarity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty sure I know people who've put their battery in backwards and are now stupider...

  17. Why ask the masses? by TrollstonButterbeans · · Score: 1

    Maybe. Maybe not. Discussion of it probably won't lead to any insights.

    Alexander Fleming had the idea of eliminating diseases by having kids drink a pink liquid extracted from fungus.

    Who would have thought drinking fungus-juice would kill pathogens?

    The brain offers many mysteries we need to unravel, many of them are probably very counter-intuitive and defy present day "logic".

    --
    Priest: "Universe from nothing, no laws of physics, sped up time"+ huge discrepancies. Creationism? No. Big Bang Theory
  18. Hold on... by msobkow · · Score: 2

    Hold on. Let me plug in my brain so I can add up these numbers.

    Damn I wish they'd let us use calculators instead...

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Hold on... by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      Ever heard the phrase "let me put my thinking cap on" ?

      This kind of makes that a real thing.

      Thinking on a much bigger scale - can this kind of technique be used to raise the limit of human intelligence? Can the world's brightest minds benefit from this? Is there potential for this kind of research to eventually aid in driving humanity further than we could otherwise have gone?

      Fascinating possibilities if this is true...

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
  19. Ob. Cars by swm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I threw a monkey wrench into the engine of my car, and it ran slower. Maybe if throw something different into it, it will run faster

    1. Re:Ob. Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the thing you throw into it is a large cloud of heated oxygen, I suspect the analogy will hold.

    2. Re:Ob. Cars by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      Wrong approach. You need to get your car's engine to throw monkey wrenches. Reverse the polarity of the monkey wrench beam, if you will.

      --
      -
  20. Brain damage mimic autism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    news at seventy three. Whoops, time for my jolt.

    1. Re:Brain damage mimic autism by sexconker · · Score: 1

      news at seventy three. Whoops, time for my jolt.

      My autistic child is a perfect unique snowflake indigo crystal child, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Brain damage mimic autism by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Some children are Yellow snowflakes.

  21. of course by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    Of course it can. How else could my calculator work.

  22. Well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No. [BZZZZZT!] Ouch! I mean, Yes. [Bling!]

  23. hello again 18th century nonsense by rubycodez · · Score: 1, Interesting

    so here we are back at 18th century stupidity levels, passing currents through parts of people's bodies and trying to cause or attributing all manner of health improvements to it. snake oil futures are looking good

    1. Re:hello again 18th century nonsense by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 0

      so here we are back at 18th century stupidity levels, passing currents through parts of people's bodies and trying to cause or attributing all manner of health improvements to it. snake oil futures are looking good

      Yes.

      Am I alone in being utterly terrified at this trend in research?

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    2. Re:hello again 18th century nonsense by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Am I alone in being utterly terrified at this trend in research?

      I am, too neither, excited by the prospect of a return to electro-shock therapy as a correctional therapy for antisocial behavior.

      The bar measuring proactive social behavior moves around too often for that shit.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:hello again 18th century nonsense by Natural+Philosopher · · Score: 1

      So I guess months of physical therapy including TENS are of no use for this? Well, not even number theory?

  24. That's preposterous science fiction mumbo jumbo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's an electronium hat which harnesses the power of sunspots to produce cognitive radiation.

  25. It worked for by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

    It worked for teaching chimps to fly

  26. What about ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about Math, can it make you better at programming?

  27. TDCS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    TDCS is not a new subject, There's a whole subreddit dedicated to it, not to mention hundreds of studies using TDCS for everything from curing Tinnitus to increasing general memory and cognitive function.

  28. Math disability gain? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    If disabling a brain area makes people better at maths, one can wonder what this area is doing? It There must be some function assoicated with it. In other word: what do we win to be bad at maths?

    1. Re:Math disability gain? by LukeStephenRehmann · · Score: 1

      For sure, TDCS usually increases activity around the positive electrode and decreases it around the negative electrode. In this case i'm sure the minor sacrifice these people are making is worth the potentially disabling number-dyslexia.

    2. Re:Math disability gain? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      I just wonder what ability is shut down in order to improve math skills. In other words, what it the anti-math ability?

    3. Re:Math disability gain? by LukeStephenRehmann · · Score: 1

      I don't think there really is any Anti-Abilities in the brain. In my research (ahem, extensive internet browsing) on the subject the only positive gains you can get from negatively stimulating a particular area are from when that area is causing problems. As this article states (excerpt below), the gains from this particular experiment are from increasing [positive] stimulation in the math-oriented areas of the brain. If you down-regulate any part of the brain, you're not really "unlocking" any new ability but rather just making that area function less... which can be a good thing (stress, pain, etc).

      "He found that he could temporarily turn off regions of the brain known to be important for cognitive skills. When the parietal lobe of the brain was stimulated using that technique, he found that the basic arithmetic skills of doctoral students who were normally very good with numbers were reduced to a level similar to those with developmental dyscalculia." "That led to his next inquiry: If current could turn off regions of the brain making people temporarily math-challenged, could a different type of stimulation improve math performance? Cognitive training helps to some extent in some individuals with math difficulties. Dr. Cohen Kadosh wondered if such learning could be improved if the brain was stimulated at the same time."

    4. Re:Math disability gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really about shutting down an anti ability. It is more about inducing authistic behaviour by suppressing activity in a part of the brain. In this way, you can access lower level of information and bypass some of the processing that gets in the way. A goog page on how it works can be found here: http://www.trans-cranial.com/howitworks/effectsonthebrain

    5. Re:Math disability gain? by manu0601 · · Score: 1

      As this article states (excerpt below), the gains from this particular experiment are from increasing [positive] stimulation in the math-oriented areas of the brain.

      But they say simulating an area decreased performance:

      When the parietal lobe of the brain was stimulated using that technique, he found that the basic arithmetic skills of doctoral students who were normally very good with numbers were reduced to a level similar to those with developmental dyscalculia.

  29. TDCS by LukeStephenRehmann · · Score: 1

    I have the parts on order, It's called TDCS and there's a ton of research about it. This "discovery" is nothing new.

  30. Reversable by LukeStephenRehmann · · Score: 1

    Technically, this is possible. With TDCS, the negative end of the electrode will have reduced brain activity around it and the positive electrode will have increased activity. In most TDCS regimes, the negative electrode goes somewhere on your torso or arm, thus only making your biceps dumb.

  31. also... by LukeStephenRehmann · · Score: 1

    Some regimes call for negative feedback to reduce activity such as those for tinnitus or some depression montages.

  32. Get Zapped! by LukeStephenRehmann · · Score: 1

    If you want to get shocked for science, there are tons of studies that use this technique for all kinds of stuff. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/...

  33. Can Electric Current Make People Better At Math? by reboot246 · · Score: 2

    No, but drinking beer can make you smarter.

    It made Bud wiser!!

    No joke like an old joke.

  34. 30 or 40 amps by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    ...and you'll never make another math error.

  35. Other methods by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    A ten year old public school boy was finding fifth grade math to be the challenge of his life. His mom and dad did everything and anything to help their son...private tutors, peer assistance, CD-ROMs, Textbooks, even HYPNOSIS! Nothing worked.

    Finally, giving up they enrolled him into a small Catholic school to await another destiny.

    At the end of the first day of school the boy walked in with a stern expression on his face, and walked right past the parents and went straight to his room -and quietly closed the door. For nearly two hours he toiled away in his room -with math books strewn about his desk and the surrounding floor. He only emerged long enough to eat, and after quickly cleaning his plate, he went straight back to his room, closed the door, and worked feverishly at his studies until bedtime.

    The parents were not sure if they should comment on the boys extra efforts for fear of him losing this new found fervor, so they seemingly ignored it. This pattern continued ceaselessly.

    One day the first quarter report card came out. Unopened, he dropped the envelope on the family dinner table and went straight to his room.

    His parents were petrified. What lay inside the envelope? Cautiously the mother opened the letter, and to her amazement she saw a bright red "A" under the subject, MATH.

    Overjoyed, she and her husband rushed into their son's room, thrilled at the remarkable progress of their young son!

    "Was it the nuns that did it?", the father asked. The boy only shook his head and said, "No." "Was it the one-on-one tutoring? The peer-mentoring?", asked the mother. Again, the boy shrugged, "No." "The textbooks? The teacher? The curriculum?", asked the father. "Nope," said the son. "It was all very clear to me from the very first day of Catholic school."

    "How so?", asked his mom.

    "When I walked into the lobby, and I saw that guy they'd nailed to the plus sign, I knew those people took their math seriously!"

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Other methods by Indigo · · Score: 1

      Ok, shouldn't admit it, but I literally laughed out loud on that one.

  36. tDCS, you can roll your own or get it here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is called tDCS or transcranial direct current stimulation. There is a ton of research on tDCS. It modulates brain activity by making neurons fire faster or slower. It is used for all kinds of things, improving learning, depression etc. You can make your own primitive device with a current regulator, or get one of the commercial devices. The best one, quality vs price is probably this one: http://www.trans-cranial.com

  37. Don't be silly! by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    Of course it doesn't make you better at math. I know this because when I was in the military, I was electrocuted more times than I can ...count.

  38. The Krell discovered this eons ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then their Id took over and killed them all.

  39. Not new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've been experimenting with this for a while, and it's just like trashdot to try to amp it up like it's something revolutionary.

  40. Or positive by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...

    I have hooked mine up to moderation

    Oooh yeah. MOD me more!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  41. Not nearly as effective as by nuckfuts · · Score: 0

    the teacher who gave her students oral sex for good achievement on their math tests (in the novel "Cocksure" by Mordecai Richler).

  42. Laughable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "developmental dyscalculia, similar to dyslexia but with numerals instead of letters"

    Yes, that'll be it, there's something physically wrong with their BRAINS, of course...
    It couldn't be that some people were taught the wrong way, or need to be taught a different way, to learn things... can't be that, much better to tell them they have a PHYSICAL problem...

  43. Current buns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a current bun every day, and I'm plenty good at maths. I'm also quite good as a door stop.

  44. England + "Math" = Insult! by danknight48 · · Score: 1

    Frantzesco Kangaris for The Wall Street Journal
    Oxford, England

    In England, where the article is referring to, we call it Maths.

    Lets put some electricity through someone's head and see what happens, or, drink a Red Bull for the same effect. Mmm, hard choice :P

    1. Re:England + "Math" = Insult! by cheros · · Score: 1

      Lets put some electricity through someone's head and see what happens, or, drink a Red Bull for the same effect.

      Not *quite* the same effect - it depends if your specific brain makeup is susceptible to stimulants, for the same reason that speed, sorry, Ritalin doesn't work for everyone either. Cranial stimulation is a further development of neurofeedback, where instead of just waiting for a brain region to do its thing, they take the next step and actually prod it into action.

      I wonder how much treatment is needed to "set" the trained brain switching behaviour. Standard neurofeedback is quite quickly visible as beneficial once you've hit the right spot, but to really lock in the new behaviour takes 20+ sessions - it's a bit like training muscles.

      I guess using a bigger battery won't help :)

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  45. It is already a commercial product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.foc.us/

  46. try yourself and see if it works ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't try ? now you know what you must do before starting your homework!

  47. old hat by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 1

    This story is over a year old