$a = array (1, 2, 3, 4); foreach ($a as &$b) $b++; foreach ($a as $b) $b++; print_r ($a);
It is increment twice because after the first loop, $b is still a pointer to the fourth element of $a. Continuing in the code, the second loop will assign the fourth value of $a each value of $a, then increment it. Try debugging it like so:
"Can the owner of a gun shop be charged as an accessory if a gun they sold is used in a murder?"
Yep.
If I go to a gun shop and say 'I need a gun, so I can kill someone,' then I am sold a gun, you bet that gun show owner is an accessory.
It is. This is far from being a law. Call your senators and representatives and let them know that you will not vote for them if they support this bill...
So, If I were still under 18, and I went to a free porn site that prompts me to verify that I am indeed 18, then I would not be legally bound to tell the truth? And if I lie, then aqire access to the site and my parents were to decide to sue the website operators for providing me with such content, how would the courts rule?
Professor Foo at Bar university is denied funding, for his research on the detrimental effects of the spread of education on evolution instead of ID, by the United States Gvmt, on the grounds that he cannot proove that ID is true.
Define 'broken'. If a file is stored in a multi-part RAR Archive with passworded encryption, is it not broken? It is an absolutly useless packet of data to anyone without the password to extract it. And when its downloaded as a broken file collection, and then extracted and watched, where is the point at which it becomes illegal? Is it illegal to download the 'broken' file, or is it illegal to extract and watch it? And if it's only illegal to extract/watch the file, then is it not illegal to upload the 'broken' file?
So, what are YOU going to do with your 32.4 gigabyte/Day bandwidth?
Ahem...
Miranda Rights...
I believe the suppreme court has ruled in the past that ignorant individuals must protected to a degree...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning
"Can the owner of a gun shop be charged as an accessory if a gun they sold is used in a murder?" Yep. If I go to a gun shop and say 'I need a gun, so I can kill someone,' then I am sold a gun, you bet that gun show owner is an accessory.
It is. This is far from being a law. Call your senators and representatives and let them know that you will not vote for them if they support this bill...
So, If I were still under 18, and I went to a free porn site that prompts me to verify that I am indeed 18, then I would not be legally bound to tell the truth? And if I lie, then aqire access to the site and my parents were to decide to sue the website operators for providing me with such content, how would the courts rule?
I'm sorry, but how do you over-clock your model? Do you even know the difference between 2600+ and 2.6GHz?
"That and because you can't cuddle up to a computer next to the fire."
e tails.aspx/axim_x51v
Actually, I can.
http://www1.us.dell.com/content/products/productd
Professor Foo at Bar university is denied funding, for his research on the detrimental effects of the spread of education on evolution instead of ID, by the United States Gvmt, on the grounds that he cannot proove that ID is true.
Define 'broken'. If a file is stored in a multi-part RAR Archive with passworded encryption, is it not broken? It is an absolutly useless packet of data to anyone without the password to extract it. And when its downloaded as a broken file collection, and then extracted and watched, where is the point at which it becomes illegal? Is it illegal to download the 'broken' file, or is it illegal to extract and watch it? And if it's only illegal to extract/watch the file, then is it not illegal to upload the 'broken' file?