Still... that requires SWAT? A group specially trained for hostile situations to be used as last resort? Are the fraudsters going to throw sharp pointy money at the officers?
I would almost go out on a limb and say it does do whatever paradigm they are looking for if they actually tried... but I don't consider myself an expert so I won't go that far. Sure, things like multiprocessing aren't there unless you consider that a feature of individual browser/sandboxes. The only limitations I can think of right now involve said sandboxes, but most core programming strategies that I'm aware of can be done in JavaScript. Some of the syntactical sugar and performance may not be there, but that doesn't mean it can't do it.
He did. The whole "story" is like Microsoft saying "I think your ice cream sucks" without actually doing anything to help create ice cream that doesn't suck by offering recipes to the ice cream factory. (Thus [re-]joining the OpenGL standards process.)
It's the same mentality that goes into gun laws. I'm sorry, but the idea of making something illegal because it may or may not have been originally intended to cause harm does not make the person in possession of that tool an "unlawful" person unless they use it for "unlawful" purposes. (Where "unlawful" could be swapped with anti-societal/evil/bad)
(note that this doesn't preclude my original guess of LulzSec being a gov't group)
I wouldn't doubt it, but not for the same reason you do (from what I understand of your posts...) My thought is that they are attacking the "youth" hangouts in order to rile up the young voters to vote something into law that they likely would not have done prior.
How was he 'aiding the escape of a prisoner' and 'disturbing the peace?'
Did the "prisoner" get away because the police had to chase him down and confiscate his camera? How would it be his fault if they let the "prisoner" go (yes, I know they didn't let anyone go...)
Also, disturbing what peace? It seemed rather non-peaceful there.
Have you had trouble with your toilet backing up when it wasn't your fault for shoving too much paper in there? How about getting water when you turn on the faucet? When the "thing" in question lies below the ground in an area not easily accessible by people driving over it with ignorant abandon these things tend to last.
On top of that people have no sense of custom: I've had one batshit insane bitch cuss me out - she signaled to change lanes in front of me, so I quickly flashed my highs twice; this historically means "go ahead you're clear." She didn't change lanes but slowed down.
Is that in the DMV handbook? Cause I've never heard that, and I'm guessing I'm not alone, as I've never seen it either.
Do you need to read a government mandated manual that gives you permission to courtesy flush as well? Do you refer to your local ordinance manual when someone holds a door for you? I'm just curious if you only do what your local government tells you to do in situations regarding common courtesy.
I routinely flash to allow trucks over and I usually get a customary return flash of their trailer lights in thanks.
A friend of mine is doing that currently for a stretch of road that just crosses over the corner of a jurisdiction line. It's a 55 mph road and there's 150 feet of it that drop to 35 mph but there are no houses, or intersections near that part of the road. I would have thought the person putting up both the 35mph and 55mph signs within 150 feet of each other would have questioned it.
Define "better" because when I did try Mono it wouldn't run anything that anyone made without really bad things happening. The worst I've had with Flash is having it slow down (aka: eat up my processor) on video rendering.
Slashdot Mirror
Still... that requires SWAT? A group specially trained for hostile situations to be used as last resort? Are the fraudsters going to throw sharp pointy money at the officers?
I'm not sure what you mean by #8.
JavaScript is run in order of inclusion. If I create two JS files and in the first I type:
function test() {
this.value = 'hello';
}
In the second I type:
var tester = new test();
alert(tester.value);
It will alert 'hello.' I do not have to have that code in the same file.
You forgot to include the 20MB+ of Silverlight libraries that need to be installed on the PC to make that 154kb file work.
I would almost go out on a limb and say it does do whatever paradigm they are looking for if they actually tried... but I don't consider myself an expert so I won't go that far. Sure, things like multiprocessing aren't there unless you consider that a feature of individual browser/sandboxes. The only limitations I can think of right now involve said sandboxes, but most core programming strategies that I'm aware of can be done in JavaScript. Some of the syntactical sugar and performance may not be there, but that doesn't mean it can't do it.
Also, I'm not sure that's what he meant.
javascript's sins against developers will become somewhat less relevant.
Or do you mean: "developer's sins against javascript"?
Just because there is a history of poor programers does not make the language any less interesting/powerful.
fundamental conceptual problems that cannot be fixed
Yeah, we wouldn't want someone to do anything related to innovation.
He did. The whole "story" is like Microsoft saying "I think your ice cream sucks" without actually doing anything to help create ice cream that doesn't suck by offering recipes to the ice cream factory. (Thus [re-]joining the OpenGL standards process.)
Thus, "third party [drivers] which may or may not have stellar security" ...
Windows doesn't come pre-loaded with wget yet (as far as I'm aware) so it's a little more difficult:
(Start / Run:) /pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest/win32/en-US/
cmd
ftp releases.mozilla.org
(User: anonymous)
(Pass: joe.blow@somewhere.com)
cd
binary
mget *.exe
(answer yes)
quit
dir Firefox*
(Run listed program)
Pretty sure I didn't miss anything...
Well, it's useful to him. He gets money! ;)
...it's awesome and fun.
It's the same mentality that goes into gun laws. I'm sorry, but the idea of making something illegal because it may or may not have been originally intended to cause harm does not make the person in possession of that tool an "unlawful" person unless they use it for "unlawful" purposes. (Where "unlawful" could be swapped with anti-societal/evil/bad)
Some already do. GTA4 comes to mind. If you used certain cheat codes it would lock out gaining achievements/trophies.
People still play that besides the bots?
(note that this doesn't preclude my original guess of LulzSec being a gov't group)
I wouldn't doubt it, but not for the same reason you do (from what I understand of your posts...) My thought is that they are attacking the "youth" hangouts in order to rile up the young voters to vote something into law that they likely would not have done prior.
How was he 'aiding the escape of a prisoner' and 'disturbing the peace?'
Did the "prisoner" get away because the police had to chase him down and confiscate his camera? How would it be his fault if they let the "prisoner" go (yes, I know they didn't let anyone go...)
Also, disturbing what peace? It seemed rather non-peaceful there.
I think federal law caps the cost at $.25 per page. Joy.
-- This page intentionally left blank --
Have you had trouble with your toilet backing up when it wasn't your fault for shoving too much paper in there? How about getting water when you turn on the faucet? When the "thing" in question lies below the ground in an area not easily accessible by people driving over it with ignorant abandon these things tend to last.
(study after study after study have consistently demonstrated that speeding in and of itself is not dangerous
Citation Needed.
http://www.motorists.org/ma/kill.html
On top of that people have no sense of custom: I've had one batshit insane bitch cuss me out - she signaled to change lanes in front of me, so I quickly flashed my highs twice; this historically means "go ahead you're clear." She didn't change lanes but slowed down.
Is that in the DMV handbook? Cause I've never heard that, and I'm guessing I'm not alone, as I've never seen it either.
Do you need to read a government mandated manual that gives you permission to courtesy flush as well? Do you refer to your local ordinance manual when someone holds a door for you? I'm just curious if you only do what your local government tells you to do in situations regarding common courtesy.
I routinely flash to allow trucks over and I usually get a customary return flash of their trailer lights in thanks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Rome,_Ohio
A friend of mine is doing that currently for a stretch of road that just crosses over the corner of a jurisdiction line. It's a 55 mph road and there's 150 feet of it that drop to 35 mph but there are no houses, or intersections near that part of the road. I would have thought the person putting up both the 35mph and 55mph signs within 150 feet of each other would have questioned it.
I just recently read about that. The amount of corruption involved in that whole town left me flabbergasted.
Google Maps works on most highways, but not all major roads and side streets.
Define "better" because when I did try Mono it wouldn't run anything that anyone made without really bad things happening. The worst I've had with Flash is having it slow down (aka: eat up my processor) on video rendering.
There's no Silverlight on my PS3, my "smart TV" or my Droid...