And thousands of climatologists agree with this poster... as do I. Plenty of holes in the global warming THEORY remain. It's a shame fearmongering surrounding this issue will always win out in the media, a headline story suggesting we can all stop worrying about global warming just won't get the ratings at this point.
This article is just plain scary... whether or not the global warming theory is true. God help us if society ever decides to trust the lives of everything on this planet to a group of scientists arrogant enough to claim they can tinker with the global climate on this scale.
Well, satellites do drift lower in their orbits (and by more than 2mm/year), how can they obtain such accuracy? If the satellite drifts lower, the ocean will seem to rise... how can they accurately compensate for that to this degree?
Too much bias in this debate. Why should the scientists "be surprised by their findings" like the article said... remain impartial when performing research or you'll explain away any "outlier" than doesn't fit your "expected outcome".
And thousands of climatologists agree with this poster... as do I. Plenty of holes in the global warming THEORY remain. It's a shame fearmongering surrounding this issue will always win out in the media, a headline story suggesting we can all stop worrying about global warming just won't get the ratings at this point. This article is just plain scary... whether or not the global warming theory is true. God help us if society ever decides to trust the lives of everything on this planet to a group of scientists arrogant enough to claim they can tinker with the global climate on this scale.
Well, satellites do drift lower in their orbits (and by more than 2mm/year), how can they obtain such accuracy? If the satellite drifts lower, the ocean will seem to rise... how can they accurately compensate for that to this degree?
Too much bias in this debate. Why should the scientists "be surprised by their findings" like the article said... remain impartial when performing research or you'll explain away any "outlier" than doesn't fit your "expected outcome".